임산물 산지종합유통센터 적정 수요예측 및 규모화 연구

전체 글

(1)C2012-49 | 2012. 12.. 임산물 산지종합유통센터 적정 수요예측 및 규모화 연구 이 송 박 김. 상 성 지 영. 민 환 은 배. 연 구 위 원 전문연구원 위촉연구원 인턴연구원.

(2) 연구 담당 이상민 송성환 박지은 김영배. 연구 위원 전 문 연구원 위 촉 연구원 인 턴 연구원. 연구총괄, 경영활성화 및 산업화 방안 임산물 산지종합유통센터 적정규모 및 수요예측 임산물 산지종합유통센터 실태조사 적정규모 예측을 위한 자료 수집.

(3) 머 리 말. 건강식품, 청정식품 등으로 인식되고 있는 단기소득임산물의 생산량은 꾸준한 수준을. 유지하고 있으며 소득의 증가와 함께 이들 품목에 대한 소비가 증가할 것으로 보인다. 이러한 소비 증대 가능성에도 불구하고 단기소득임산물의 경우 단순 가공을 통해 신선 식품의 형태로 유통되고 있기 때문에 경제성장과 더불어 신선식품보다는 가공식품, 전 통식품, 외식에 대한 시장의 요구에 제대로 부응하지 못하고 있는 실정이다.. 임산물을 가공하여 시장의 요구에 맞는 상품을 만들고 원활하게 유통시킴으로써 새로 운 수요를 개발하고 부가가치를 높이는 것은 향후 임산물 소비 증가에 매우 중요한 사안. 2004년부터 임산물 가공․유통을 전담하는 ‘임 산물산지종합유통센터’ 사업을 지원하고 있다. 이 사업은 임산물 가공 및 유통사업을 전 담할 수 있는 시설을 건립하여 임업인의 소득을 향상시키고, 대외경쟁력 강화를 목적으 로 한다. 그러나 설립 목적을 달성하기 위한 임산물 산지유통센터의 적정한 규모나 품목 별 수요량 등에 대한 고려는 부족한 실정이다. 이라고 볼 수 있다. 이러한 역할을 위해. 이 연구는 임산물의 유통구모 및 수요를 예측하여 임산물산지종합유통센터의 적정규 모 및 수요량을 제시함으로써 효과적인 시설확충 지원이 이루어질 수 있도록 하며, 경영 상의 문제점을 개선하여 체계적인 경영이 이루어질 수 있는 방안을 마련하는 것에 목적 을 두고 있다. 본 연구는 임산물 생산 및 소비에 대한 분석을 통해 임산물 수요 변화에 대해 알아보았고, 이를 바탕으로 임산물 산지유통센터의 적정규모 예측과 경영활성화 및 산업화를 위한 방안을 제시하였다.. 산지유통시설은 국제화 및 세계화에 따라. FTA. 등 국제협약에 따른 수입 증대 등을. 대비한 경쟁력 확보와 산지에서 생산된 임산물의 수집을 통한 안정적 공급 및 선별포장, 전시, 판매의 유통체계를 중심으로 유통단계 축소를 통한 고효율 저비용의 유통체계 구 축하는데 기여해야 할 것이다.. 이 연구의 원활한 진행을 위해 지원을 아끼지 않은 산림청 관계자, 현장 관계자들과. 산림조합 그리고 관련 업계 종사자 여러분들께 깊은 감사를 드린다.. 2012. 12. 한국농촌경제연구원장 이 동 필.

(4)

(5) i. 요 약 문. Ⅰ. 제 목 “임산물 산지종합유통센터 적정 수요예측 및 규모화 연구” Ⅱ. 연구의 필요성과 목적 2004년부터 임산물산지유통센터의 건립을 지원하고 있다1. 2012년까지 선정되어 사업을 진행하거나 준비하고 있는 임산물산지유통센터는 모두 72개소인데, 2013년부터는 사업비가 증가될 예정이다. 그러나 설립의 목적을 달성하기 위한 임산물 산지유통센터의 적정한 규모나 품목별 수요량 등에 대한 고려는 부족한 실정이다. 이러 산림청에서는. 한 문제점을 극복하기 위하여 현재 운영되고 있는 임산물산지종합유통센터의 가공 및 유통 시설현황을 파악하고 분석하여 지역 생산현황 및 전망과 연계한 적정규모를 파악 할 필요가 있다. 또한 전문성 부족으로 인해 어려움을 겪고 있는 경영부문 활성화를 모 색할 필요가 있다.. 이 연구는 임산물의 유통규모 및 수요를 예측하여 임산물산지종합유통센터의 적정규 모 및 개소수를 제시함으로써 효과적인 시설확충 지원이 이루어질 수 있도록 하며, 경영 상의 문제점을 개선하여 체계적인 경영이 이루어질 수 있는 방안을 마련하는 것을 목적 으로 한다.. Ⅲ. 연구내용 및 방법 이 연구는 서론을 포함하여 4개의 장으로 구성된다. 두번째는 임산물 생산 및 소비에. 대한 내용으로 임산물 생산현황, 가공 및 유통현황, 임산물산지유통센터 조사결과, 소비. 1. 농산물산지유통센터(Agricultural Product Processing Center)는 소비지유통환경 변화에 따라 소비자의 요구를 반영할 수 있는 체계로 변화하는 과정에서 발전한 농산물산지유통 시설이며, 산지유통조직과 대형유통업체의 직거래 개념이 활성화 되면서 집하, 선별, 포장, 저장 등의 과정을 한꺼번에 처리할 수 있도록 건립됨(최병옥 외. 2010)..

(6) ii 실태 분석, 시장전망 등이 포함된다. 세번째 장은 임산물 산지유통센터 적정규모 예측에 관한 내용을 담았다. 마지막으로 임산물산지유통센터 경영활성화 및 산업화를 위한 방 안을 제시하였다.. 소비자조사와 임산물산지유통센터 조사를 실시하였는데, 소비자조사는 도시에 거주하. 는 주부를 대상으로 하였다. 임산물산지유통센터 조사의 경우 현재 경영 중인 센터 가운. 데 원료조달이나 운영 면에서 정상적인 궤도에 오른 것으로 판단되는 업체를 중심으로 조사하였다. 판단은. 2009년부터 사업을 시작하였으며, 수익이 2년 이상 발생한 센터를 기준으로 하였다. 그 결과 전체 72개소 가운데 23개가 해당되었다. 일반 업체에 대한 조 사는 따로 실시하지 않고 과거 조사결과를 인용하였다. 연구에 이용된 통계는 최근 3년 간 자료를 중심으로 이용하였다. 산지유통센터의 적정 규모 선정을 위하여 경영효율성 분석 지수를 적용하였다. 임산 물산지유통센터 수요예측을 위해서는 지역별 생산량에 따른 적지분석을 실시하고 취급 물량을 시나리오별로 작성하여 적정규모를 적용한 유통센터 수요량을 도출하였다. 취급 물량 시나리오는 농산물산지유통센터(Agricultural. Product Center)의. 취급물량 비중을. 기준으로 하여 작성하였다. 산업화를 위해 거점 임산물산지유통센터 도입 방안을 제시 하였는데, 권역은 지역별 생산량을 기준으로 구분하였다.. Ⅳ. 주요 연구결과 ① 낮은 가공수준 및 자동화 비율, ② 비용구조 개선 필요, ③ 기술개발 체계 미비, ④ 대형유통업체 납품 비율 저조, ⑤ 소비자 신뢰를 위한 원산지 표시 및 관리, ⑥ 품목별 및 수준별 지원방안 차별화 임산물가공업체 조사결과. 현재 경영 중인 센터 가운데 원료조달이나 운영면에서 정상적인 궤도에 오른 것으로 판단되는 산지유통센터를 중심으로 조사를 실시하였다. 그 결과 나타난 문제점으로는. ①산지유통조직 부재, ②원물 확보 어려움, ③낮은 시설 이용률, ④거래 협상력 취약, ⑤ 산지유통센터의 계획적 배치 및 선정 미흡 등이 있었다. 전국 광역시와 시에 거주하는. 20대 이상 50대 사이의 주부 527명을 대상으로 소비자. ① 임산물 가공식품에 대한 수요증대 가능성, ②대중매체를 통한 홍보 체계 구축과 신뢰도 높은 정보 제공 필요, ③ 유통매장 다변화 필요, ④소비자 신뢰 구축, ⑤가격인하 방안을 강구할 필요가 있다. 조사를 실시하였다. 조사를 통해 도출할 수 있는 시사점은. 산지유통센터의 조직화, 전문화, 다양화, 규모화의 기본방향 아래 경영활성화 및 산업.

(7) iii. ①전문화된 산지유통조직 육성 및 역량강화, ②공동계산 및 계약재배 도입, ③임산물 외 취급 허용, ④운영자금 지원을 위한 제도개선, ⑤기금조 성 마련, ⑥거점 임산물산지유통센터 도입 등이 있다. 화를 위한 방안은 다음과 같다.. 품목별 거점 임산물 산지유통센터가 설립될 권역을 살펴보면 아래의 표와 같다. 밤,. 생표고버섯, 떫은감, 산채류 등 4개 품목에 대해. 12개 권역으로 나뉘어지며, 이들 12개 권역에 설립될 예정인 임산물 산지유통센터는 전체(114개)의 52.6%에 해당하는 60개소 이다. 이들 임산물 산지유통센터는 12개의 거점 임산물 산지유통센터로 통합된다. 설립. ․. 될 지역은 선정되지 않았지만 몇 개의 시 군은 품목의 거점 임산물 산지유통센터가 중. ․. 복되는 경우가 발생한다. 이들 시 군에 대해서는 품목별 거점센터를 독립적으로 운영. 하기 보다는 합병하여 운영함으로써 추가적인 거래교섭력 제고, 비용 절감, 시설 이용의 효율화, 브랜드 가치 증대 등 다양한 이점을 살릴 수 있을 것으로 기대된다. 복합 거점. 임산물산지유통센터 입지를 선정할 경우 부여, 하동, 화순이 해당된다. 복합 거점센터가 부여에 설립되면 취급하게 될 주요품목은 밤, 생표고버섯, 산채류 등이며, 취급물량은. 5,880톤 이상이 될 것이다. 통합되는 권역은 밤의 중부권역, 표고버섯의 중부권역, 산채 류의 충청권역이며, 이로 인해 통합되는 산지유통센터는 14개가 된다. 하동의 복합 거점 센터의 경우 밤과 떫은감을 주로 취급하게 될 것이며, 취급물량은 7,160톤 이상이 된다. 통합권역은 밤의 남부권역, 떫은감의 남중부권역 등이며, 통합될 임산물산지유통센터는 13개가 된다. 화순의 복합 거점센터는 떫은감과 산채류를 주로 취급하게 될 예정이며, 취급물량 5,000톤 정도로 예상할 수 있다. 통합되는 권역은 떫은감의 남서부권역, 산채 류의 전남권역이며, 통합될 예정인 임산물산지유통센터는 11개가 된다. 따라서 생산되는 해당 임산물의 취급규모를 20%로 설정할 경우 최종적인 신규 임산 물산지유통센터는 총 62개소가 설립될 수 있을 것이며, 규모에 따라 구분하면 복합 거점 임산물산지유통센터 3개소, 거점 임산물산지유통센터 5개소, 임산물산지유통센터 54개 소 등이 된다..

(8) iv. ABSTRACT A study for searching the proper size and scale of Forest Product Center. Korea forest service(KFS) supports to build a Forest Product Center(FPC) from 2004, and the number of FPC running or prepare for running in 2012 is 72. KFS is planning to extend the number of FPC and to increase support money from 2013. This study is designed to find a proper size and the required number of FPC to attain the object of the business. It is also supposed to suggest some management measures to revitalize FPCs. This study contains the results of consumers survey and the outlook of several important non-timber products. In this study FPCs are divided by the handling products, and analyzed by the management outcomes. The FPC which shows the best outcomes will be the standard for the proper size of FPCs, which deals similar products. The capacity of the standard facility for each product will be the basis to estimate the number of FPCs demanded nationwide. The size of refrigerator, sorting area, and processing area for chestnuts, persimmons and jujubes are 400㎡, 330㎡, and 165㎡, respectively. In this case the facility can handle 600 tons for chestnuts, 520 tons for persimmons, and 370 tons for jujubes. The standard size of refrigerator of the FPC handling wood mushrooms(Shitake) is 330㎡, and this can process 400 tons of mushroom per year. For the dry mushroom the refrigerator size is 495㎡ and the process capacity is 35 tons. For wild greens refrigerator is 992㎡, and sorting area is 397㎡. Its dealing capacity is 280 tons. To handle 20% of total product the number of FPCs demanded is 15 for chestnut, 8 for wood mushroom, 5 for dry wood mushroom, 40 for persimmon, 5 for jujube, and 28 for wild greens. To revitalize FPCs it is the most import job to make a group of integrated members. Many producers will provide enough products that can run the facilities year around. Well organized groups with confidence and trust will have no problem to gather products. This will solve financial problem of buying raw materials. FPCs should be managed by specialists. For stimulating FPCs to make integrated groups the government policies on forest product management need to center on FPCs. The regulation to deal only forest products needs to be removed to increase running efficiency of facilities. Since many for-.

(9) v est products are harvested during a short period of a year, a quite big fund is needed to buy the products. It is also need to make stronghold FPCs to increase competitiveness. Neighboring main product areas are grouped together, and the FPCs in these area with the same handling product make a stronghold FPC to strengthen the marketing competitiveness and to increase efficiency of facility utilization. There are two groups of areas for chestnut. One located in Chungcheongnamdo groups 5 FPCs, and is able to handle 3 thousand tons of chestnuts. The other one locates in lower part of peninsula, and it will also group 5 FPCs with 3,000-ton handling capacity. Wood mushroom makes only one stronghold FPC, while persimmon and wild greens make 4 and 5 stronghold FPCs, respectively. There are some cities which can be candidates for different stronghold FPCs. The best cities for three different areas will have mixed-stronghold FPCs at each place. Buyeo may have a mixed-stronghold FPC, which will handle chestnuts, wood mushrooms, and wild greens. This facility will group 14 single FPCs, and its dealing capacity is about 5,880 tons. The other two cities are Hadong and Hwasun. Mixed-stronghold FPC in Hadong will deal chestnuts and persimmons, and it will group 13 FPCs. The one in Hwasun will process persimmons and wild greens, and combine 11 FPCs. The final number of FPCs to be built is 62. There will be 54 new FPCs, 5 new stronghold FPCs, and 3 new mixed-stronghold FPC. Researchers: Lee, Sang-Min, Song, Seong-Hwan, Bark, Ji-Eun and Kim, Young-Bae Research period: 2012. 6. - 2012. 11. E-mail address: [email protected].

(10)

(11) vii. 차. 례. 제1장 서 론. ·································································································· 1 연구 내용과 방법 ········································································································· 3 제2장 임산물 생산 및 소비 1. 임산물 생산현황 ··········································································································· 5 2. 가공 및 유통현황 ······································································································· 12 3. 임산물산지유통센터 ···································································································· 19 4. 소비실태 분석 ············································································································· 29 5. 임산물 시장전망 ········································································································· 45 제3장 임산물 산지유통센터 적정규모 예측 1. 경영분석을 통한 적정규모 예측 ··············································································· 49 2. 지역별 생산량에 따른 적정 수요 예측 ···································································· 54 3. 요약 ······························································································································ 71 제4장 임산물 산지유통센터 경영활성화 및 산업화 방안 1. 기본방향 ······················································································································· 74 2. 경영활성화 및 산업화 방안 ······················································································· 75 부 록 1. 지역 통합 거점 유통센터 운영 우수사례 1. 햇사레과일조합공동사업법인 ····················································································· 97 2. 대구경북능금농협 문경거점산지유통센터 ······························································ 100 1. 2.. 연구의 필요성과 목적. 참고문헌 ···························································································································· 103.

(12) viii. 표 차 례. 제2장 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표. 2-1. 2-2. 2-3. 2-4. 2-5. 2-6. 2-7. 2-8. 2-9. 2-10. 2-11. 2-12. 2-13. 2-14. 2-15. 2-16. 2-17. 2-18. 2-19. 2-20. 2-21. 2-22. 2-23. 2-24. 2-25. 2-26. 2-27.. ․. ～2011) ·································································· 6 떫은감 최대 생산 시․군(2009～2011) ··························································· 6 대추 최대 생산 시․군(2009～2011) ······························································· 7 생표고버섯 최대 생산 시․군(2009～2011) ··················································· 8 건표고버섯 최대 생산 시․군(2009～2011) ··················································· 8 고로쇠 수액 최대 생산 시․군(2009～2011) ················································· 9 고사리 최대 생산 시․군(2009～2011) ··························································· 9 취나물 최대 생산 시․군(2009～2011) ··························································· 9 주요 임산물 가공품 현황 ··············································································· 10 상품별 청도반시 가공화 현황(2007, 2011) ·················································· 11 임산물 가공비용 대비 세부비용의 비중 ······················································· 14 임산물 식품가공업체 원료조달 방법 ····························································· 15 임산물 가공식품 판매경로 ············································································· 16 임산물 가공산업 활성화를 위해 가장 시급한 정책 ···································· 17 조사 임산물산지유통센터 ··············································································· 19 임산물산지유통센터 유형별 주요현황 ··························································· 26 소비자 대상자 지역별 분포 ············································································ 30 응답자 가구소득 분포 ····················································································· 30 식재료 구입비별 응답자 분포(2012년) ························································· 31 식재료 구입비별 응답자 분포(2009년) ························································· 31 지난 1년간 임산식품 구입경험 여부 ···························································· 32 식재료 구입비별 임산식품 구매경험 응답자 ··············································· 32 주요 임산식품별 구매경험 비율 ···································································· 33 밤 및 밤 가공식품 구매경험(중복응답) ························································ 33 감(떫은감) 및 감(떫은감) 가공식품 구매경험(중복응답) ···························· 34 대추 및 대추 가공식품 구매경험(중복응답) ················································ 34 표고버섯 및 표고버섯 가공식품 구매경험(중복응답) ································· 35 밤 최대 생산 시 군(2009.

(13) ix. 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표. 2-28. 2-29. 2-30. 2-31. 2-32. 2-33. 2-34. 2-35. 2-36. 2-37. 2-38. 2-39. 2-40. 2-41. 2-42. 2-43. 2-44. 2-45.. 제3장 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표. 3-1. 3-2. 3-3. 3-4. 3-5. 3-6. 3-7. 3-8. 3-9. 3-10. 3-11. 3-12.. ········································· 35 약용류 및 약용류 가공식품 구매경험(중복응답) ········································· 36 임산식품 구매 정보 획득 방법 ······································································ 36 임산식품 구매 경로별 구매 요인 ·································································· 37 제품 원료의 원산지 확인 여부 ······································································ 38 국내산 임산식품 구매 동기 ············································································ 39 국내산 임산식품 가격대비 품질 평가 ··························································· 40 수입산에 대한 국내산 임산식품 품질 평가 ················································· 40 국내산 임산식품 구입의 문제점 ···································································· 41 국내산 임산식품 소비 의향 ············································································ 41 국내산 임산식품 소비 확대를 위한 의견 ····················································· 42 임산물 가공식품 개발에 대한 선호 ······························································ 42 임산식품 직판장 이용 여부 ············································································ 43 임산식품 직판장 ‘이용하지 않는다’ 응답 이유 ··········································· 43 밤 수급 전망(생밤환산기준) ··········································································· 46 표고버섯 수급 전망(생표고 환산기준) ·························································· 47 대추 수급 전망(건대추 기준) ········································································· 47 떫은감 수급 전망(신선감 환산 기준) ···························································· 48 산채류 및 산채류 가공식품 구매경험(중복응답). ························································· 50 밤 취급 임산물산지유통센터 경영지표 분석 결과(2011년) ························ 50 표고버섯 취급 임산물산지유통센터 경영실적 ·············································· 51 표고버섯 취급 임산물산지유통센터 경영지표 분석 결과 ··························· 51 산채류 및 약용식물 취급 임산물산지유통센터 경영실적 ··························· 52 산채류 및 약용식물 취급 임산물산지유통센터 경영지표 분석 결과 ········ 52 수액 및 와인 취급 임산물산지유통센터 경영실적 ······································ 53 수액 및 와인 취급 임산물산지유통센터 경영지표 분석 결과 ··················· 53 취급품목별 임산물산지유통센터 소재지(산림청 자료 기준) ······················ 55 소재지역별 임산물산지유통센터 취급품목(산림청 자료 기준) ················ 56 밤 주요 생산지 생산량 비중 및 임산물산지유통센터 개소수 ··················· 57 생표고 주요 생산지 생산량 비중 및 임산물산지유통센터 개소수 ··········· 58 밤 취급 임산물산지유통센터 경영실적.

(14) x. 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표. 3-13. 3-14. 3-15. 3-16. 3-17. 3-18. 3-19. 3-20. 3-21. 3-22. 3-23. 3-24. 3-25. 3-26. 3-27. 3-28. 3-29. 3-30. 3-31. 3-32. 3-33. 3-34.. 제4장 표 표 표 표 표 표 표 표. 4-1. 4-2. 4-3. 4-4. 4-5. 4-6. 4-7. 4-8.. ··········· 58 떫은감 주요 생산지 생산량 비중 및 임산물산지유통센터 개소수 ··········· 59 대추 주요 생산지 생산량 비중 및 임산물산지유통센터 개소수 ··············· 60 산채류 주요 생산지 생산량 비중 및 임산물산지유통센터 개소수 ··········· 61 수액 주요 생산지 생산량 비중 및 임산물산지유통센터 개소수 ··············· 62 주요품목의 임산물산지유통센터 취급비중 ··················································· 63 시나리오별 밤 취급 임산물산지유통센터 수요량 ········································ 64 밤 취급 임산물산지유통센터 후보지 ····························································· 65 시나리오별 생표고 취급 임산물산지유통센터 수요량 ································ 65 생표고 취급 임산물산지유통센터 후보지 ····················································· 66 시나리오별 건표고 취급 임산물산지유통센터 수요량 ································ 66 건표고 취급 임산물산지유통센터 후보지 ····················································· 67 시나리오별 떫은감 취급 임산물산지유통센터 수요량 ································ 67 떫은감 취급 임산물산지유통센터 후보지 ····················································· 68 시나리오별 대추 취급 임산물산지유통센터 수요량 ···································· 68 대추 취급 임산물산지유통센터 후보지 ························································· 69 시나리오별 산채류 취급 임산물산지유통센터 수요량 ································ 69 산채류 취급 임산물산지유통센터 후보지 ····················································· 70 시나리오별 수액 취급 임산물산지유통센터 수요량 ···································· 70 수액 취급 임산물산지유통센터 후보지 ························································· 71 임산물산지유통센터 품목별 적정규모 및 수요량 ········································ 72 신규 임산물산지유통센터 품목별 적지 및 수요량 ······································ 73 건표고 주요 생산지 생산량 비중 및 임산물산지유통센터 개소수. ··············································· 86 시군별 표고버섯 취급 임산물산지유통센터 개소수 ···································· 88 시군별 건표고 취급 임산물산지유통센터 개소수 ········································ 89 시군별 떫은감 취급 임산물산지유통센터 개소수 ········································ 90 시군별 대추 취급 임산물산지유통센터 개소수 ············································ 91 시․군별 산채류 취급 임산물산지유통센터 개소수 ···································· 93 품목별 권역 구분 ····························································································· 94 복합 거점 임산물 산지유통센터 건립 예정지 및 통합 품목 ····················· 96 시군별 밤 취급 임산물산지유통센터 개소수.

(15) xi. 그 림 차 례. 제1장 그림 그림. 주요 임산물 생산량 추이. 2-1. 2-2. 2-3. 2-4. 2-5. 2-6. 2-7. 2-8.. 깐밤 가공시설 라인. 4-1. 4-2. 4-3. 4-4. 4-5. 4-6. 4-7.. 밤 생산지 권역구분. 제2장 그림 그림 그림 그림 그림 그림 그림 그림. 제4장 그림 그림 그림 그림 그림 그림 그림. ················································································ 1 연구 추진체계 ·································································································· 4. 1-1. 1-2.. ······················································································· 20 표고분말 및 표고환 가공시설 라인 ····························································· 21 표고슬라이스 가공시설 라인 ········································································ 22 표고장류(된장) 가공시설 라인 ····································································· 22 표고장류(볶음고추장) 가공시설 라인 ·························································· 22 감와인 가공시설 라인 ··················································································· 24 산머루와인 가공시설 라인 ············································································ 24 나물류 가공시설 라인(데친나물) ·································································· 25 ······················································································· 86 표고버섯 생산지 권역구분 ············································································ 87 건표고 생산지 권역구분 ··············································································· 88 떫은감 생산지 권역구분 ··············································································· 89 대추 생산지 권역구분 ··················································································· 91 산채류 생산지 권역구분 ··············································································· 92 품목별 거점 임산물 산지유통센터 설립 가능 시․군 ······························ 95.

(16)

(17) 1. 제. 서. 1.. 1. 장. 론. 연구의 필요성과 목적 국내총생산액(GDP)에서 임산물이 차지하는 비중은. 2000년 0.3%에서 0.2%로 감소하 였고, 2004년 다시 0.1%로 감소한 후 정체상태에 머물러 있다. 이러한 임업의 축소현상 은 농업과 마찬가지로 농촌인구 도시진출로 인한 노동력 부족, 생산자 고령화 등에 기인 한 것이라 말할 수 있다. 그러나 근본적인 원인은 국산 임산물 소비부족, 가격하락 등으 로 인해 산업의 활성화가 미진하였기 때문이다.. 그림 1-1. 주요 임산물 생산량 추이 생산량(천톤). 120.0 100.0 80.0 60.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 2005. 2006. 2007. 2008. 2009. 2010. 연도 대추. 떫은감. 밤. 표고. 2011.