• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

¯Z,nÌ#[ø #+P#‚Ë#+PÌ# U\#¶.Ì#

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "¯Z,nÌ#[ø #+P#‚Ë#+PÌ# U\#¶.Ì#"

Copied!
6
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

Demo

1. #g«#

’Ê ¶Êâ ·nn6 î®â ¾ β â:nê &ê Ӓ

ZBãÒ rÊÒ ²:. ÊÒ Z®B †W û®î ‚«š Ê Æî Bê ÚÊn  ê 6Úæ ’š Êÿ² û® e Ê:š : ç®â Æ¿²:. Ê g&r ‚«š Êÿ² âZ 2ú²– ²W

ʇJ:ê Ӓ ò2Zš Fû®B ÆÊî ^g® ®"ãÒ

ã2úê ٚ ÿ²² ²:.1-17

‚«k– ӒZB2ú² g&r ÿ:& ®² ²‡ªÒ Êÿ²

¯Z,nÌ#[ø #+P#‚ Ë#+PÌ# U\#¶.Ì#

¨Ê#¶.Ì#%Ö #«s#0Þ#

`|w}Oƒ`.}»LS.}‹Sh..}¿##T}`ƒk./..%}¿¿t./..# Àý(™# ÄÐ5™</#.DÁ(™#`F|5™</##

..œ­^™¬#ظôì ¬(#

+5338„#5#47¼#Q:/#5338„#7#;¼#„,#

#

Wkh#Hiihfw#ri#Ehdg#Vl}h#dqg#Guxj#Vroxelolw|#rq#Guxj#Uhohdvh#iurp#

Rvprwlf#Judqxoh#Gholyhu|#V|vwhp#iru#Qlihglslqh#

Vxqj#Fkdq#Mhrqj/#Vh#Ndqj#Fkrq*/#\rxqj#Kr#Mr*/#Prrq#Vxn#Nlp**/#

Erqj#Ohh/#Jlovrq#Nkdqj*,**%/#dqg#Kdl#Edqj#Ohh*,**# Department of Polymer Engineering, Pukyung National University,

100, Yongdang Dong, Nam Ku, Busan 608-739, Korea

*Department of Advanced Organic Materials Engineering, Chonbuk National University, 664-14, Dukjin Ku, Jeonju 561-756, Korea

**Nanobiomaterials Laboratory, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, P. O. Box 107, Yuseong, Daejon 305-343, Korea

(Received February 14, 2005;accepted April 8, 2005)

S¨ÜӒš ZB®† Z² $– ë: g® ®îÎ ‚«š Êÿ² Rªê jq rk® >fÎ rÆKk® K

÷¾R BB Žrfš J𮆠ZÊ 2n:. v/‹ ª[†² rÆr ‚«š Êÿ² R– ’š ·n®Ê “z

®ê 22‹R þΠӒΠîj–š B¾®ê Ӓ‹, N6 Ӓ® òš Æ^¶ n Þê n‚’² ‡n:.

r² :Π†– n‚® ¦.ê W† :Î ç® 22– n‚ ª[·š ÿ®B š n Þ:.  R– W ª[ >& †Òr r² :Î þJ²ê ª[nê ÿ·® k2& †Ò :Êâ î:. R® †V Ên³ ò–

FnÆ, Êê RÊ Vê š²ÊW® ~ʲ β ÙÊÒ "r:. B² n‚® ¦.V ¦n³ Ӓ®  òÊ FnêÆ Êê n‚Ê ¦n³ ’® ·nV üê ْ² êkr:. ÿò·® Ӓ ÿÊê Ӓ®  ò& Æ Wûš N& ÿò· v3® gꇚ ¢ n Þ:. Ê :.š Ê ‚«š Êÿ² R– v/‹ ª[š Ê ÿ®B rƶ n Þ’Æ, R® †– n‚® ¦., ÿò·& †Ò Ӓ® òš Æ^¶ n Þ¢š «Î®V:.

G

Abstract:Osmotic granule system which is one of the drug delivery systems has been developed to improve manu- facturing process and other problems of tablet osmotic systems. It consists of water swellable seed layer, nifedipine drug layer, and drug release controlled membrane layer and manufactured by fluidized bed coater. The granule size and mem- brane thickness can be controlled by various amounts of seed and coating solution, respectively. It could be observed that the morphology of osmotic granule was different at each coating step as well as type of coating solution. The bigger the size of granule, the slower the release rate was observed due to decreasing the total specific surface area of granule. Also, it was observed that the increase of membrane thickness was caused to retard the dissolution of nifedipine due to decreasing the water absorption rate. The drug solubility for dissolution media is greatly affected to nifedipine release. From these results, we assured that osmotic granule can be fabricated by fluidized bed coating methods, and the appropriate release profile could be controlled by the controlling of bead size, membrane thickness and dissolution media.

Keywords: osmotic drug delivery system, granulation, fluidized bed coating.

To whom correspondence should be addressed.

E-mail: [email protected]

(2)

ْ² 6ÚæÒ “z®â ®Æî, n‡®&r kr® ëŠ r

–  Ö&r ҆nê ‚«š Êÿ®B Ӓ òš F2ú 6 ÓþÒ Fû2ú† Z² ëÊ:. Ê ‚k® ûf– ZûV

® /‡Êî pH& ŠV®â Òk² ã² Ó’Ê òÊ r:

ê fÊ:. B² Ór® žÞ² Kÿ& †Î Þš ZÊê ë’

²r ‚«kš Êÿ®B ®> ²Þ® ƒ>² ÊB² Þš V

®â n:.1,2

ÊB² ‚«k– 1974š& Theeuwes® FÂ& ®Ê ²â>Z

‚«k(elementary osmotic pump, EOP)Ê rÛn†& ÊÊB Alza®

OrosÒê Þے² W’² gê² Z®Ò f®6 Þ:.15,16 ÊB² ²â>Z‚«k® ÂÆê Ӓš B¾®ê ®î® ‹R

‚R e “zû{š " ²n‡ 6Úæ ‹’² ‡r Ê‹ÂÆ

² ÎÖê n‚’² Ê>Ž Þ:.17-20 N Î& “zû{š 

" ²n‡ 6ÚæÒ ¦ r Bê N Êš Êÿ®ê BB k2® k rV FÂn ª:.7,8

®" n² ӒZB†v²r ‚«kš Êÿ®êÆ Þr Ý V >fš V6 Þ:. v rÆ® K÷² Rk’² ÎÊ BB >Ò Æ&r ®î® krV 3r:ê ÙÊ:. V²W’²

“zû{š Vê ²n‡ 6ÚæÒ Êÿ®B ®î® ‹š ":6 N Z& Ӓš B¾®ê ‹’² jqš rƲ:. N :¢ n‚

’² ª[š ®6 Ó’Ê òv n Þê z’úÒ "6:.4-13 Ê]â BB V® Kkš Æ&Ò" ®î® krV š‡v n Þ ê K÷² KkÊ:. N Î& :Î >f– ²Þ& ®î® krÒ K ÿ®† ¢Ž& krV rV² ç/®  š  šŠF ÓþÒ

 n š  šÒ Kÿ² ®æ&â BW² ŽrÒ Ò’ n

Þ:.

v/‹ ª[†vš Êÿ² R® rÆê ÊB² kr® Žrf

š Ê®† ZÊr ‚«kR v² k2Ò Vê Rš r ƶ n Þ:. v/‹ ª[†vš Êÿ² R® rÆê k‡ Ë 3‡ ’ Z& “zû{š Vê ²n‡ 6Úæ ‹R Ӓš ¾ v®6 Þê ‹’² ª[š ®B rkš š‡®ê ÙÊ:. Ê]â

š n Þ:.

Ê]â rÆr R– ÊZ® krk2&r Vê >fš Jš¶

n Þâ n:. v v/‹ ª[†v® ûfÎ $– ç® 3Ê Z>² Kk’² Vû®Æ,21-23 BB Kk g& ӒZBš Z² z

’úÒ "2ê Kk– n‚ ® KOk‡ ’š y¢’²¾ ʶ n Þ:. B, ®î® krÒ Kÿ¾’²¾ îö n Þê Ž rf– nC r® Rš ²Þ& Kÿ¾’²¾ rvÊ Vû®:. B B RÊ /Ò² k2² Ӓš ò¾’²¾ R g& rV² ç /®  ê RÊ Ê®ªÒ Ӓ® ò&ê Ââ Wûš N®

  ê:. ÊB² BB ûf’² ήB BB Ӓ ZB 2ú²&r

‚«š Êÿ² Rš F®6 Þ:.24-30

N FÂ&rê ’& V² ÿÊV 10 µg/mL k² – ӒÎ

îj–š þΠӒ² ÿ®B R® †– ÿò·& V² ÿ Ê® Wûš ¢šJ6æ ®V:.31-34†Òr W B >&r® R

® k2& V² 6†R W †¿ î&r® Ökr& †Î îj

–® ò Æ/, R® †& V² ò® Wû, n‚® B¦.

W ÆÊš vk®V:. B² ÊB² ²W ÆÊ&r îj–® ò ª:î& V®B Ò®®V:.

2. /##

2.1 'È Z ÷

N :.&r ÿr þΠӒΠîj–– Unique Chem. Co. Ltd.

(India)&r ÂÛ®B ÿ®V:. k‡ ˒² ÿr z+Ë(sugar sphere)– IPS(Milan, Italy)&r ÂÛ®B ÿ®V6, Óözúê Junsei Chem. Co. Ltd.(Japan)&r ÂÛ®V:. D-Z?öú– &Nb2

^Ê(TEC)ê Sigma Chem. Co.(St. Louis, MO, USA)&r ÂÛ®

B ÿ®V:. ®Ê2³2Z²šªN–F²zú(HPMC 606, BFGood- rich, Korea)ê ¿r² ÿ®V6, Vâr² ÿr PEG200(poly- (ethylene glycol) 200), PEG6000(poly(ethylene glycol) 6000), Tween 80(polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate)R ‚«r² ÿr RªÒ¾ (KCl)– Showa Chem. Co. Ltd.(Tokyo, Japan)²Ö† ÂÛ®V6, :K k‡’² ÿr VŽº– Samchun Pure Chem. Co., Ltd.(r,

²Ã)²Ö† ÂÛ®V:. n‚𠇮6 Þê ^–F²z ú(CA)ê šŽ†V 39.8 wt% ¾vr ٚ Aldrich Chem. Co.

(Milwakee, USA)&r ÂÛ®B ÿ®V6, v2Ò) RL100–

Röhm GmbH & Co. KG(Germany)&r ÂÛ®V:. N :.& Êÿr

’– Milli-Q kª2ú²(Millipore, France)š Êÿ, kr² 3~ ó®n Ò ÿ®V6, N Î& ÿr þ6 v†ÿ:ê HPLC G_® Ù

š ÿ®V:.

2.2 G£ g»

R® rÆê v/‹ ª[†Î Uniglat(Glatt, Germany)š Êÿ®

B ª[š :2®V:. z+Ë& n“z‡ 6ÚæÎ HPMCÒ ¿

r² Êÿ®B BB Ökr– ¾. ª[®V:.37-39 ²W® ª[š

ZÊ 22‹® ª[& ÿr Ökr® †¿R ª[ ÆÊ– Tables 1 e 2& î:. ª[Ê š"r 22‹& Ӓ‹š ª[®† ZÊ

Table 1. The Formulations of Nifedipine Controlled Release Bead Ratio (%)

Ingredients

Seed DrugIa1 DrugIIa2 MembraneIb1 MembraneIIb2 Sugar sphere 19.01

Seed 16.98 9.28

Drug layer 13.21 23.33

Lactose 12.67 10.61 11.59 Fructose 3.16 3.71 4.06 HPMC 606 1.26

CA 0.86 0.76

Eudragit RL 0.51 0.45

HPMC E5 1.27 1.39

HPC 0.56 0.50

KCl 1.53 0.42 0.46

SiO2 0.28 0.37 0.41

PEG 6000 0.25 0.32 0.35

PEG 200 0.56 0.49

Nifedipine 3.71 4.06

Glycerol 0.56 0.49

Tween 80 0.21 0.23 0.92 0.82

TEC 0.08 0.07

Water 17.42 12.73 13.91 0.75 0.66

Ethanol 12.73 17.83 19.48 7.45 6.58

Acetone 31.67 31.83 34.78 74.53 65.85

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

a1,2 DLIIHUHQWVL]H P»P E\GLIIHUHQWVHHGDPRXQW

b1,2 Different membrane thickness(1.5»3%) by different coating solution amount.

(3)

Tables 1 e 2& îò ƇR ª[ ÆÊš Êÿ®B ª[š :2®

V:. 22® çš Æ^®B r² :Î Â†Ò Vê Ӓ‹ Rš

š n Þ:. ª[ &ê 60 ×&r f«®B, 242Z /ž êÊ ÿ:Ò rÆ®V:.40

†V r² :Êâ rÆr /Ò® Rš o– ç® n‚ ª [·’² ª[š :2®V:. 6Ò² n‚š † ZÊ ª[·®

ƇR ª[ ÆÊ– Tables 1 e 2& †Ò :2®V:. ª[r n‚

® ¦.Ò Æ^®† ZÊr ª[·® çš B®B n‚® ¦.Ò Æ^®V:. ª[ &ê 60 ×&r f«®B, 242Z /ž êÊÿ:

Ò rÆ®V:.40rÆr R® k2ê Figure 1& î:.

2.3 Ÿ2g G£ ôç Z #W 3

rÆr R® ÿò 2.– USP ~: r2ëš ÿ®B :2®V :. rÆr R 0.3 gš zÒJ ÷æ& y6, ÿò2.†Î DST-610 (Fine Sci. Instrum., Korea)Ò Êÿ®B ÿò 2.š nß®V:. ÿò

·– r 2·(ÎKû·, pH 6.8)& Tween 80R SDSÒ 1 wt%² ®B 900 mLÒ ÿ®V:. ~ê 37·0.5 ×, ~: ãê 75 rpm’² nß

®V:. 2"ê 1, 4, 8, 12 e 24 2Z& W 1 mLš š>®V6, W 2"O 5r® .bš š>®V:.

2.4 ³ Ïh Z §KË`,k g»

îj–® ²VÖk7v NîZÒ † ZÊ îj– 100, 10 e 1 µg/mL® ã² rƲ , HPLCÒ Êÿ®B Ús®V:.41

 ²VÖk7v NîZê Y (’ÊÂÊW)AÝX(ã)B

® 3’² k®V’Æ Ê 3’²Ö† Ӓ® ãÒ k®V:. B, R Ö& Þê Ӓ® çš k®† ZÊ R 0.1 gš 100 mL

® ª‚& y ^¢bÚ†(Sonics & Materials Inc., CT, USA)Ò Êÿ®B ÿÊ2þ   P †® : š†(Millipore, USA)

² BR®B .b 1 mLÒ š>®B HPLC Úsš ®B N çš  k®V:.41¾ .b® nê ÿò2 .bR /Ò² 뒲 :2

®V:.

2.5 KSOF#Ïh#

þΠӒΠîj–® ò Æ/š «Î®† ZÊ HPLC² k

®V:. Ús& ÿr HPLCê ÿ:âZ(SD-200, Dynamax, Hous- ton, USA)– æ/.bÎs†(AI-3, Dynamax, Houston, USA)² Â

‡n Þ6, ÆÊ†Ò  Z² 2ú²– –F²2000(V. 4.2)

š ÿ®V:. Ӓš Öò®† ZÊ UVÖò†(UV-1, Dynamax, Houston, USA)Ò ÿ®V6, UVbû– 235 nm² Öò®V:. Ú

& ÿr BR– ODS-3 CP(GROM-6,/  PÝ250 mmÝ4.6 mm, GROM Co., Germany)Ò ÿ®V:. Ê/– ’, ª‚, šŽö

(111)š ÿ®B rÆ®6, ^¢bÚ†Ò Êÿ®B †

² , 0.45P †® š†² BR®B Vš®V:.42Ê/® vã

– 1 mL/min’² wk®V6, .b® nê ² 2"O 5r² ®V’

Æ, Ê g ²V, ²6 hš Ò6 îŽÒ 6®B ®V:.

2.6 ÈW£#ô¿#{Ã#ÈW£#tç#

Figure 2& îò îj–® ÂÆ&r R n ÞEÊ îj––

ÿ‡ Ӓ²r ’& V² ÿÊV : :. Ê& Ӓ® ÿÊ

& †Î Ӓ® ò– W† :Î ÿÊÒ Vê ʲ‡r² rÆr ÿò· &r :Êâ îö n Þ:ê Ù& Vk®B, r

² :Î ÿÊÒ Vê ÿò· &r :.š nß®â n:.

Ӓ– Tween 80 ÊÎ& SDSÒ 1 wt% ¾v®6 Þê ÿ· &r ÿò 2.š nß®V:.

2.7 VHP#l`#

z+Ë& ª[r 22‹R Ӓ‹, n‚š SEM(scanning electron microscope, Model: S-2250N, Hitachi Co., Tokyo, Japan)š Êÿ®B þJ²Ò V†®V:. SEMš wk®† ZÊ Rš ^ãf Z&

6k² , 𲇠†Î šÊ: VúÒ ÿ®B 1Ú 30^ /ž Ý

– ^k’² ª[®V:.

3. #ûG#Z#ë«##

3.1 G£#g»#

UniglatÒ Êÿ®B rÆr R– Ӓ‹® †& †Òr Ó 750, Table 3. The Solubilities of Nifedipine in Different Dissolution Media

Dissolution media Artificial serum

Tween80 (1 w/v%)

Artificial serum

SDS (1 w/v%)

6ROXELOLW\ JPL) 166.8 255.4

Table 2. The Coating Conditions of Nifedipine Controlled Release Bead

Condition

Outlet temperature 28»32 ×

Inlet temperature 27»42 ×

Inlet air pressure 2.0»2.1 Torr

Spray air 1.2»2.4 Torr

Flow 14»18 ml/m

Partition height 15 mm

Figure 1. Structure of osmotic controlled release granule, (A) membrane, (B) nifedipine drug layer, (C) swellable polymer layer, and (D) sugar sphere.

+D,#

+E,#

+F,#

+G,#

NH

NO2

COOCH3

CH3 H3C

H3COOC

Figure 2. The structure of nifedipine.

(4)

800 e  P kΠٚ š n Þ:. B, W† :Î Â†Ò Vê Ӓ‹&r n‚® ¦.V WW 1.5, 3%² ª[r Rš

š n Þ:.

3.2 g»g#G£#ó?§

z+Ë& 22‹š ª[² – Ӓ‹š ª[² , n‚š ª [² ® þJ²ê Figure 3& î:. Figure 3(A)»(C)& î

î ÞEÊ 22‹R Ӓ‹š ª[² ® R ²Ê– : Æ æš Ê úZ^Ê k2² Úr , R® ²Ê&r ÊÆn k‡Ê n:ê ٚ JBV:. n‚® , Figure 3(D) e (E)&

 :šB ²Êš V6 Þ:. Êê CA– o– n‚ k‡ ’

– ÚÊ šÒ ÿÊr 2&r Îæ& ®Ê úZ^Ê k2² Úr , ª[n† ¢Ž& 22‹R Ӓ‹® ²ÊJ: >‚ :

šB ٚ R n Þ:. B², n‚® ¦.V ¦"n³ ²Ê Ê ª :šB ٚ R n Þ:.

3.3 G£#tç#»$#

rÆr R– ÿò· &r ‚RÎ KCl² β ã~Ê&

®Ê 3‡r ‚«’² ÎÊ ÿò· ® ’š n‚Î CAÒ

& Þê ÚæÊ W– ²n‡ VârÒ ÿÊ2úâ n6, ’& ÿ

š Ê ª $– ç® ’Ê ·nnâ r:.35Ê]â ·nr ’– Ó

’‹š ÿÊ2úÆî, ëÊ2úâ r:. Figure 4&r R n ÞEÊ ê ²n‡ 6ÚæÎ HPMCÒ ““2úâ r:. Ê]⠓“r “z

û{š Vê ²n‡ 6Úæê ÿÊnÆî ëÊr Ӓ‹® ‡Ú

š R® ÎÖ² òš ®â nê ÙÊ:. B², n‚ Ö& :

® ’š ¾v®â n Rš ““2úâ n6, Êê ÿÊ Bê ëÊr Ӓ‹® ‡Úš R ÎÖ² ò2úê ê{š vr®

B Ӓ® òš V㪮â r:.

Ê¢& ’š ·n®ê R® š²ÊWÊ Ên³ VW’² $–

ç® ’Ê ·nnâ r:. Êê R® †– V~Ê ÞêÆ, R

® †V çšn³ i– š²ÊWš Vâ n6 Êê :® ’

š ·n¶ n Þâ r:. Êê Figure 5&r– oÊ R® †V ç

šn³ :® Ó’Ê ònê Ù&r R n ÞEÊ ‚«š Ê ÿ² Ӓ® ò& Æ Wûš N®ê ْ² "r:. Êê çš

R® †& š–®B óVr R® š²ÊWÊ ÿò·&r J : $– ’R g_¶ n Þr ’® ·nÒ _®V:6 "r :. Êê :® ’š ·n®â ~& †Ò :K k‡’² ÿr ÚæÊ W– ²n‡ VârÒ $Ê ÿÊ®B n‚ ÎÖ² v

///// ////// /

(A) (B) (C)

///// /

(D) (E)

Figure 3. SEM photograph of the bead, (A) The bead coated by seed OD\HU % GUXJOD\HURIP & GUXJOD\HURIP ' EHDGFRDWHGE\

membrane, and (E) bead coated by 3% membrane(original magnificationÜ%50).

(A) (B) Figure 4. The mechanism of drug release from the osmotic granule, (A) before dissolution and (B) during dissolution.

(5)

òn† ¢Ž& $– :Kš k‡®B Ӓ® òš V㪮â n ê ÙÊÒ6 "r:.35

Rš ª[®6 Þê n‚® ¦. Ӓ® ò& Wûš N

®êÆ, Êê Figure 6&r Jê ÙîR /Ò² 22‹R Ӓ‹&

n‚® ¦." B®Vš , n‚® ¦.V ݚn³ Ӓ

® òÊ ¾Òê ٚ R n Þ:. Êê ÿò· ® ’Ê ‚«

& ®Ê n‚š ‚R¶ n Þê ‚ V n‚Ê Ýšn³ è

š† ¢Ž’² "r:. :® ’Ê ‚R~’²¾ ’& ®Ê Ó

’‹š ÿÊ®Æî ëʶ n Þê ãV ¾Ò6 B², Ӓ®  òš v®ê n‚ ® :KÊ J: Óâ k‡Ê v n ކ ¢

Ž’² "r:.43

Û¿®Ê ‚«š Êÿ² R&r® Ӓ® ò ª:î– † Ê® BB jq rkRê v®Æ, Êê ¦ V® :Î ª:

î® çÿ’² ÎÊ r3²:.  ÞN² ‚«š Êÿ² R–

Ö®R ÎÖ® Ê& KCl& ®Ê 3‡r ‚«Ê ’š R Êÿ®ê rk® †NÊ r:. ¦ ÞN² R® Ö&r KCl® ã

 ~ʲ ÎÊ n“z‡ 6Úæ² ª[r 22‹’² ’š ¢:

Êê ْ² Êê 22‹š ““2r RÖ® Ӓš R® Î

7ʖ o– ª:î– †Ê® EOP î jq rkR o– ÙÊî, Ӓ® òÊ Òîê IÊ †Ê

® EOPî jq– Ӓ òš Z² z’úÒ ®B Ê>

:ê fÊ :6 ¶ n Þ:.

3.4 ÈW£#ô¿#{Ã#ÈW#tç#»$

Ӓ® ÿÊ& †Î Ӓ® ò Æ/Ê z ÙÊÒê Vk

®&r nß®V® :.– Ӓ® ÿÊ& †Ò Ӓ® òÊ  z:ê ٚ JB R:. òÿ‡ ӒΠîj–®  ’& V

² ÿÊV  JPL k² : :. :K‡ š Êr ÒÖ Ö® Ӓ– :K‡ š Êr ÿÊn  6 «Ê Òîâ n òÊ nê ÙÊ:. Êê Figure 6&r R n ÞEÊ W† :Î  ʲ‡rÒ B¾®ê ÿò· &r® Ӓ® ÿÊê O² ~ ÊÒ JV’Æ, Êê Ӓ® ò Æ/& O² Wûš R:.

W ÿò· &r® Ӓ® ò¶š Figure 7& î:. B†r R n ÞEÊ Ó’® ÿÊê Ӓ® ò¶& O² Wûš N®

6 Þ¢š «Î¶ n Þ:.38 Ӓ& V² ÿÊê Ó’Ê R

® ÎÖ² ¶Žî‚  ÿÊn ònê Ó’Ê $šâ n6 Êê ò ãÒ ¶Êâ ®êÆ š Râ r ْ² "r:.

4. #û«##

N FÂ&rê v/‹ ª[†Ò Êÿ®B rÆr R® Ӓ ò

& V®B R® †– Ӓ® ÿÊ& ®² Wûš «Î¶ n Þ:. Ӓš &®ê 2Z /ž rr ò Æ/š † ZÊrê R® †V O² Wûš N®ê ٚ ¢ n Þ:. R® Â

†V çšn³ $– ç® Ó’Ê òÊ nê ٚ JV:. B², R

® Ӓ® ÿÊê Ó’Ê ònê ÿò·& †Ò Æ ~ÊÒ J BR:. è– Ó’ ÿÊÒ Vê ÿò·&r® Ӓ ò– ÿ ÊV – ÿò·&r® Ӓ òJ: ª $– ç® Ó’Ê  òn:.

Z N FÂÒ j+’² BB :Î Ökr® †¿î e òÿ‡

" šÒ B nÿ‡ e r² :Î ’‡š Vê Ӓ& W ÿ2r Ö ª k«² Ӓ® ò ª:îš 2Û®† Z² :.š

ã ß gÊ:.

[÷£ KÜN FÂê æ&Ö ~ŽV ‡û/{ Rr& ®

®B Ê>¢’² Ê& f2:.

ƒ+S##

1. G. Khang, J. M. Rhee, and H. B. Lee, “Drug Delivery System Using Figure 7. The release profiles of nifedipine bead having different solubilities to different dissolution media.

433

;3#

93#

73#

53#

3

Release(%)

3# 8# 43# 48# 53# 58#

Time(hour)

Figure 6. The effect of different membrane thickness of nifedipine bead on release profile.

433

;3 93 73

53 3

Release(%)

#3# 8# 43# 48# 53# 58#

Time(hour)

Figure 5. The effect of different size of nifedipine bead on release profile.

433

;3#

93#

73#

53#

3

Release(%)

#3# 8# 43# 48# 53# 58#

Time(hour)

#

(6)

Osmotic Pump”, in High Efficiency Anticancer Drug Using Polymeric Biomaterials, H. B. Lee, Editor, Munundang Publishing Co., Seoul, Chap.

10, pp 135~154 (2004).

2. H. B. Lee, D. H. Lee, B. K. Kang, S. Y. Jeung, and G. Khang, J. Korean Pharm. Sci., 32, 241 (2002).

3. G. Khang and H. B. Lee, Biomedical Polymers, Korean Chemical Society Press, Munundang, Seoul, Korea, 2001.

4. L. Liu, G. Khang, J. M. Rhee, and H. B. Lee, Korea Polym. J., 7, 289 (1999).

5. L. Liu, G. Khang, J. M. Rhee, and H. B. Lee, Biomater. Res., 3, 47 (1999).

6. L. Liu, G. Khang, J. M. Rhee, and H. B. Lee, Bio-Med. Mater. Eng., 9, 297 (1999).

7. L. Liu, G. Khang, J. M. Rhee, and H. B. Lee, J. Control. Rel., 67, 309 (2000).

8. L. Liu, J. Ku, G. Khang, B. Lee, J. M. Rhee, and H. B. Lee, J. Control.

Rel., 68, 145 (2000).

9. G. Khang, J. Ku, B. Lee, and H. B. Lee, Biomater. Res., 4, 20 (2000).

10. D. H. Lee, G. Khang, and H. B. Lee, Biomater. Res., 5, 1 (2001).

11. B. K. Kang, G. Khang, J. M. Kim, S. Y. Jeung, H. B. Lee, and S. H. Cho, J.

Korean Pharm. Sci., 33, 179 (2003).

12. L. Lui, G. Khang, J. M. Rhee, and H. B. Lee, Acta Pharm. Sinica, 38, 620 (2003).

13. L. Lui, Q. Xu, G. Khang, J. M. Rhee, and H. B. Lee, Acta Pharm. Sinica, 38, 966 (2003).

14. F. Theeuwes and T. Higuchi, U.S. Patent 3,845,770 (1972).

15. F. Theeuwes, J. Pharm. Sci., 64, 1987 (1975).

16. P. S. L. Wong, B. L. Barclay, J. C. Deters, and F. Theeuwes, U.S. Patent 4,765,989 (1986).

17. F. Theeuwes, Pharm. Int., 5, 293 (1984).

18. F. Theeuwes, Novel Drug Delivery Systems, ADIS Press, 157 (1981).

19. H. Kage, R. Abe, R. Hattanda, T. Zhou, H. Ogura, and Y. Matsuno, Powder Technol., 130, 203 (2003).

20. P. B. Deast, Microencapsulation and Related Drug Processes, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1984

21. M. Donbrow(Ed.), Microencapsulation and Nanoparticles in Medicine and Pharmacy, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1991.

22. H. Ho, C. Chen, and M. Sheu, J. Control. Rel., 68, 433 (2000).

23. Y. Wang and M. A. Winnik, Macromol., 23, 4731 (1990).

24. J. Siepmann, F. Lecomte, and R. Bodmeirer, J. Control. Rel., 60, 379 (1999).

25. P. Rama Rao and P.V. Diwan, Pharm. Acta Helv., 72, 47 (1997).

26. M. F. Saettone, G. Perini, P. Rijli, L. Rodriguez, and M. Cini, Int. J.

Pharm., 126, 83 (1995).

27. P. S. Shah and J. L. Zatz, Drug. Dev. Ind. Pharm., 18, 1759 (1992).

28. T. U. Okarter and K. Singla, Drug. Dev. Ind. Pharm., 26, 323 (2000).

29. R. C. Rowe, A. D. Kotaras, and E. F. T. White, Int. J. Pharm., 22, 57 (1984).

30. J. C. Gutierrez-Rocca and J. W. McGinity, Int. J. Pharm., 103, 293 (1994).

31. F. W. Goodhart, M. R. Harris, K. S. Murthy, and R. U. Nesbitt, Pharm.

Technol., 8, 64 (1984).

32. I. Niopas and and A. C. Daftsios, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 32, 1213 (2003).

33. M. Takahashi, M. Mochizuki, T. Itoh, and M. Ohta, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 42, 333 (1994).

34. E. C. Feleder, M. Befumo, M. A. Ricci, Coppari, and J. Faour, Clin.

Pharmacol. Therap., 75, PI-41 (2004).

35. J. S. Grundy and R. T. Foster, Clin. Pharmacokinet., 30, 28 (1996).

36. P. D. Henry, Am. J. Cardiol., 46, 1047 (1980).

37. P. Colombo, R. Bettimi, G. Massimo, P. L. Catellani, P. Santi, and N. A.

Peppas, J. Pharm. Sci., 84, 991 (1995).

38. R. C. Rowe, Int. J. Pharm., 29, 37 (1986).

39. A. Wade and P. J. Weller (Eds.), Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients, Am. Pharm. Assoc., Washington DC, 1994.

40. M. R. Harris, I. Ghebre-Sellassie, and R. U. Nesbitt, Pharm. Technol., 10, 102 (1986).

41. M. M. Meier, L. A. Kanis, and V. Soldi, Int. J. Pharm., 278, 99 (2004).

42. H. S. A. Auda, T. A. Najjar, K. I. Al-Khamis, B. M. Al-Hadiya, N. M.

Ghilzai, and N. F. Al-Fawzan, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 22, 241 (2000).

43. I. Niopas and A. C. Dafrsios, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 32, 1213 (2003).

참조

관련 문서

Computer calculations have been performed for demultiplexing of the multiplexed spectrum reflected from a 40 strain sensor system to test the restoration algorithm with its

For the first group, the novice problem solving caused the novel idea to be in competition with other ideas, and the novel idea played a role in deciding on the leader. For the

Using the temperature-dependent anomalous excitation spectrum of liquid helium films derived within the ring-diagram approximation, we evaluated the relaxation time explicitly as

The light emission was analyzed as functions of the excess Si concentration, the thermal annealing temperature, and the annealing periods by using photoluminescence (PL)

At LT, all of the pencil leads exhibited slightly increased resistivtiy, indicating that each pencil basically had an insulating property, even though each pencil contained a

Using the K-matrix induced with the R-matrix method, the partial photoionization cross sections for the excited Be(2s3s. 1,3 S) states, which had not been investigated previously,

Pictures of the orbital motion of the earth and the moon, which are presented in secondary-school textbooks are drawn with different observational reference frames by necessity,

TiO 2 films were deposited at different oxygen composition ratios by using RF magnetron sput- tering, and their structural and optical properties were examined as functions of