• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

R&D연구결과보고서

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "R&D연구결과보고서"

Copied!
150
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

방송통신정책연구 15-진흥-016

ITU와 ISO/IEC 대응 표준화 거버넌스 분석 및 표준화 활동강화 방안 연구

The Global Governance of Standardization of ITU and ISO/IEC: Challenges and Strategies

for National Standard Policies

민병원/김지영/석혜민/이진경

2015.12

연구기관: 이화여자대학교 산학협력단

(2)

이 보고서는 2015년도 미래창조과학부 방송통신발전기금 방송통신 정책연구사업의 연구결과로서 보고서 내용은 연구자의 견해이며, 미 래창조과학부의 공식입장과 다를 수 있습니다.

(3)

제 출 문

미래창조과학부 장관 귀하

본 보고서를 『ITU와 ISO/IEC 대응 표준화 거버넌스 분석 및 표준화 활동강화 방안 연구』의 연구결과보고서로 제출합니다.

2015년 12월

연구기관: 이화여자대학교 산학협력단 총괄책임자: 민 병 원 참여연구원: 김 지 영 석 혜 민 이 진 경

(4)

목 차

제1장 서 론 ······················································································································· 1

제2장 ITU, ISO/IEC 현황 조사 및 기구의 성격 ······································································ 5

제1절 ITU 표준화 거버넌스 ··· 5

1. ITU 표준화 개요 ··· 5

2. ITU 일반 ··· 7

3. ITU 하위 구조 ··· 23

제2절 ISO/IEC 표준화 거버넌스 ··· 37

제3장 정보통신 표준화의 권력갈등 구조 및 현황 ······························································ 48

제1절 미국의 표준화 거버넌스 ··· 48

제2절 유럽의 표준화 거버넌스 ··· 57

제3절 일본의 표준화 거버넌스 ··· 87

제4절 중국의 표준화 거버넌스 ··· 93

(5)

제4장 기술표준의 “글로벌 공공재”적 속성 및 거버넌스 분석 ······································· 96

제1절 표준과 표준화의 기본 성격 ··· 96

제2절 표준화 메커니즘의 작동방식 ··· 101

제5장 기술표준의 프레임워크 분석 및 ICT 거버넌스에 대한 적용 ·································· 106

제1절 국제무역과 기술표준 ··· 106

제2절 네트워크 외부성과 거버넌스 ··· 109

제3절 표준화 거버넌스의 복합적 구조와 국가전략 ··· 116

제6장 결 론 ···················································································································· 122

참고문헌 ······························································································································ 126

(6)

표 목 차

<표 2-1> 주요 국제표준의 역사 ··························································································· 5

<표 2-2> ITU 주요 연혁 ········································································································ 7

<표 2-3> ITU 법률문서와 개정 주체 ··················································································· 13

<표 2-4> ITU 운영진 (2015년 11월 현재) ············································································ 14

<표 2-5> ITU 회원 현황 (2015년 11월 현재) ······································································· 15

<표 2-6> 우리나라의 주요 ITU 활동 ··················································································· 19

<표 2-7> ITU 의장단(의장, 부의장) 진출 현황 (2014년) ····················································· 20

<표 2-8> 우리나라의 ITU ICT 발전지수(IDI) 순위 (2014∼2015년) ······································· 21

<표 2-9> ITU-R SG의 연구과제 우선순위 분류 ··································································· 29

<표 2-10> 권고의 분류 ······································································································· 31

<표 2-11> ITU-R과 ITU-T의 표준화 작업 비교 ···································································· 35

<표 2-12> ISO, IEC, JTC 1의 사용 명칭 등 비교 ································································ 38

<표 2-13> 국제표준(IS) 단계 절차 (정상절차) ····································································· 42

<표 2-14> JTC 1의 표준 개발 단계 ···················································································· 43

<표 2-15> 한국 ITU 연구위원회 주요 연혁 ········································································· 46

<표 3-1> ITAC-R 연구 그룹 ································································································· 52

<표 3-2> ITAC-T 연구 그룹 ································································································· 52

<표 3-3> ITAC-D 연구 그룹 ································································································· 53

(7)

<표 3-4> IEEE 표준문서의 유형 ·························································································· 56

<표 3-5> 유럽연합의 정보통신 표준화 관련 법규 및 문서 ················································ 59

<표 3-6> 유럽연합 투명성 지침의 주요 내용 ····································································· 64

<표 3-7> 유럽연합의 표준구현 지원 세부사항 ··································································· 73

<표 3-8> 유럽연합 ICT 연동계획 용서 ················································································ 74

<표 3-9> 유럽연합 ICT 표준의 역할이 필요한 분야 ··························································· 75

<표 3-10> 유럽연합 표준화기구 ·························································································· 77

<표 3-11> ETSI 회원 구성 (2012년) ···················································································· 77

<표 3-12> ETSI 주요 발간물 현황 (2012년) ········································································ 78

<표 3-13> CEN 회원 구성 (2012년) ····················································································· 80

<표 3-14> CEN 주요 발간물 현황 (2012년) ········································································· 81

<표 3-15> CEN 표준개발 절차 ···························································································· 81

<표 3-16> CENELEC 회원 구성 (2012년) ············································································· 82

<표 3-17> CENELEC 주요 발간물 (2012년) ·········································································· 83

<표 3-18> 유럽표준의 중지, 변경 및 폐지 개념 ································································ 84

<표 3-19> 유럽표준화기구의 협력체계 ··············································································· 84

<표 3-20> ICTSB의 구성 ······································································································ 85

<표 3-21> 비엔나 협약 ······································································································· 86

<표 3-22> 드레스덴 협약 ···································································································· 86

(8)

<표 3-23> JIS와 국제규격과의 통합 현황 ··········································································· 88

<표 3-24> JIS를 인용한 일본의 주요 법률 ········································································· 88

<표 3-25> 일본의 ISO 참가 현황 ························································································ 89

<표 3-26> 일본의 IEC 참가 현황 ························································································ 90

<표 4-1> 표준화기구의 거버넌스 유형 ············································································· 105

<표 5-1> 네트워크 외부성의 유형 ···················································································· 110

<표 5-2> 산업정책 수단의 분류 ························································································ 116

<표 5-3> 산업화에 따른 국가-사회관계의 변화 ······························································· 118

수치

[그림 2-1] ITU 조직도
[그림 2-6] ITU-T의 연구과제 승인절차 ① 회원국의응 답 (10개국  이상 응답과  과반수  찬성)최소 2개월1개월주기적인 TSAG회의 검토최소 2개월연구과제제안서 제출연구과제 제안서  배포 SG회의: 검토 및  채택 함의 TSAG 회의소집문서에  정보공지 SG회의승인 (컨센서스) 회원국에결과공지SG:회원국의협의요청회원국에승인요청 회원국에결과공지 회원국에 공지 WTSA 검토/할당②③ ◌  권고 승인절차: 2001년 이전에는 모든 권고가 TAP 절차
[그림 2-9] 한국 ITU 연구위원회 조직도

참조

관련 문서

이와 관련해서 최근 관심이 고조되고 있는 BPM(Business Process Management)은 6시그마를 통한 프로세스 개선 후 이를 현업에 적용, 관리하기 위한 차세대 IT시스템으로

- 하이딩 기법은 파형과 예상되는 중간 값 사이의 연관성을 끊거나 최소한으로 하는 기법이다. 예상되는 중간 값 연산이 반복적으로 수행된다고 한다면, 되도록 다른

ICT 기술․인프라를 기반으로 모든 산업이 융합되고 나아가 스마트화를 기반으로 사회와 문화까지도 융합되는 스마트융합 환경이 도래하였다. 산업 전반의 부가가치 제고와

무는 부호 또는 영상을 전송교환하기 위한 전기통신설비를 타인의 통신용으로 제공하는 전기통신역무로 세 번째인 전용역무는 특정 사람에게 전기통신설비의 독점적

ICT 기술․인프라를 기반으로 모든 산업이 융합되고 나아가 스마트화를 기반으로 사회와 문화까지도 융합되는 스마트융합 환경이 도래하였다. 산업 전반의 부가가치 제고와

한편, 이동통신시장은 한정된 주파수, 대규모 투자, 규모의 경제로 시장 진입이 용이하 지 않은 특성을 가진다. 따라서 경쟁력 있는 신규사업자에 대한 진입장벽을 낮추고

⚬ 시뮬레이션 정확성을 확보하기 위한 가장 직관적인 방법으로 각 시뮬레이션 작업의 시작 시간을 시뮬레이션 태스크의 릴리즈 타임과 같게 하고 데드라인 을 태스크

o 한림대학교의 특성화방향은 융합연구교육으로 의료생명 분야의 역량과 성과에 주력하여 왔으나 변화하는 사회경제적 요구에 부응하기 위해 ICT 콘텐츠분야의 특성화를