본 연구에서 제안한 누적위해성평가 가이드라인은 2019년 시행하는 화학제품안전법의 관리를 위한 과학적 근거 마련에 기여할 수 있다. 특히 아직 제대로 논의되지 않고 있는 어린이 등 민감집단의 생활화학제품 노출 저감을 위한 정책 마련에 유용하게 쓰일 수 있다.
하지만 누적위해성평가의 활성화를 위해서는 국내의 상황에 맞는 사례 개발 및 데이터베이 스 통합이 시급하다. 제6장에서 제안한 향후 과제를 중심으로 국내에서 누적위해성평가 정착을 위한 시도를 지속적으로 진행하여야 한다. 또한 이를 뒷받침할 수 있도록 누적위해 성평가의 제도화가 필요하다. 이와 동시에 누적위해성평가의 확대 방안 또한 고려하여야 한다. 우선 누적위해성평가 도입으로 영향을 받을 수 있는 산업계 등 이해관계자, 그리고 소비자들의 의견을 충분히 수렴하여 누적위해성평가 적용 범위에 대한 컨센서스 확립이 필요하다. 또한 누적위해성평가가 우선적으로 적용되어야 할 분야에 대한 우선순위 선정 또한 이루어져야 한다. 이러한 과정을 통한 누적위해성평가의 정착화 및 활성화는 생활환경 에서의 국민의 안전 강화에 크게 기여할 수 있을 것이다.
｜참고문헌 ｜
[국내문헌]
관계부처 합동(2016), ｢생활화학제품 안전관리 대책｣.
국립농업과학원(2012), ｢한국형 농약노출량 산정모델 확립 및 평가방법 선진화｣.
국립환경과학원(2006), ｢소비자노출평가기법 개발연구(Ⅰ)｣.
국립환경과학원(2012), ｢생활화학용품에 함유된 위해우려물질에 대한 위해성평가｣.
국립환경과학원(2014a), ｢생활화학용품 함유 유해화학물질 건강영향 연구｣.
국립환경과학원(2014b), ｢제품위해성평가 기법연구(Ⅰ)｣.
국립환경과학원(2015a), ｢제품위해성평가 기법연구(Ⅱ)｣.
국립환경과학원(2015b), ｢생활화학용품 함유 유해화학물질 노출평가 기반구축(Ⅱ)｣.
국립환경과학원(2015c), ｢생활화학용품 함유 유해화학물질 노출평가 기반구축(Ⅲ)｣.
국립환경과학원고시 제2016-30호, ｢위해우려제품 위해성평가의 대상 및 방법 등에 관한 규정｣.
농촌진흥청고시 제2017-5호, ｢농약 및 원제의 등록기준｣.
박동욱 외(2016), “가습기 살균제 폐 손상 피해자의 살균제 노출 특성: 태아와 임산부 노출을 중심으로”, ｢한국환경보건학회지｣, 42(3), 한국보건학회, pp.147-159.
식품의약품안전청(2011), ｢위해분석 용어 해설집(2판)｣.
식품의약품안전처 보도자료(2016.6.9), “구중청량제 등 구강용품 보존제 관리기준 통일: 식약처,
｢의약외품 품목허가·신고·심사 규정｣ 개정안 행정예고”.
식품의약품안전평가원(2011), ｢위해평가 지침서｣.
식품의약품안전평가원(2012), ｢화학물질의 복합노출에 대한 위해평가 기법 연구｣.
식품의약품안전평가원(2013), ｢농약의 복합노출평가 사례연구｣.
식품의약품안전평가원(2015), ｢농약 복합노출 위해평가 연구｣.
식품의약품안전평가원(2016), ｢잔류농약 위해평가｣.
유명순(2018), “‘2018 국민 인식조사’ 주요 결과 발표”, ｢2018 서울대학교 보건대학원 국민
인식조사 결과 발표회: 생활화학물질 위해성, 국민에게 물었다｣, 4월 18일, 서울: 서울
[국외문헌]
Andersen, D. N. et al., Ed.(2012), Exposure of Pregnant Consumers to Suspected Endocrine Disruptors, Survey of Chemical Substances in Consumer Products No.117, Danish EPA.
Andrade, A. J. et al.(2006), “A Dose Response Study Following in Utero and Lactational Exposure to Di-(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate (DEHP): Reproductive Effects on Adult Male Offspring Rats”, Toxicology, 228, pp.85–97.
Australian Government Department of Health and Aging(2012), “Diisononyl Phthalate”, National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme. Australian Government Department of Health and Aging(2013), “Dibytyl Phthalate”,
National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme. Australian Government Department of Health and Aging(2014a), “Dimethyl
Phthalate”, National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme. Australian Government Department of Health and Aging(2014b), “Di(methoxyethyl)
Phthalate”, National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme.
Bergé, A. et al.(2013), “Meta-analysis of Environmental Contamination by Phthalates”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 20(11), pp.8057-8076.
Boon et al.(2017), Monte Carlo Risk Assessment(MCRA) Software: Maintenance and Management 2016.
Boon et al.(2018), Monte Carlo Risk Assessment(MCRA) Computational Model:
Maintenance and Management 2017.
CDC(2005), Third National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals, NCEH Pub. No. 05-0570, Atlanta, GA: National Center for Environmental Health Division of Laboratory Sciences, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
CDC(2018), Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals.
Clausen, P. et al.(2004), “Emission of Di-2-Ethylhexyl Phthalate from PVC Flooring into Air and Uptake in Dust: Emission and Sorption Experiments in FLEC and CLIMPAQ”, Environmental Science and Technology, 38(9), pp.2531–
2537.
Consumer Product Safety Act(CPSA) 15 U.S.C. §2051.
Consumer Product Safety Act(CPSA) 15 U.S.C. §2657.
CropLife America(2002), Cumulative and Aggregate Risk Evaluation System Technical Manual.
Danish EPA(2015), Survey and Health Assessment of Phthalates in Toys and Other Products for Children, Survey on Chemicals in Consumer Products, 139.
Delmaar et al.(2015), “Validation of an Aggregate Exposure Model for Substances in Consumer Products: a Case Study of Diethyl Phthalate in Personal Care Products”, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, 25, pp.317-323.
Dewalque, L., C. Charlier, and C. Pirard(2014), “Estimated Daily Intake and Cumulative Risk Assessment of Phthalate Diesters in a Belgian General Population”, Toxicology Letters, 231(2), pp.161-168.
Dudzina, et al.(2015), “The Probabilistic Aggregate Consumer Exposure Model(PACEM):
Validation and Comparison to a Lower-tier Assessment for the Cyclic Siloxane D5”, Environment International, 79, pp.8-16.
ECETOC(2016), Guidance for Effective Use of Human Exposure Data in Risk Assessment of Chemical.
European Chemicals Agency: ECHA(2011), Restriction Report: Proposal for a Restriction. Substance Name: Bis(2-ehtylhexyl) Phthlate (DEHP), Benzyl Butyl Phthalate (BBP), Dibutyl Phthalate (DBP), Diisobutyl Phthalate (DIBP).
European Chemicals Agency: ECHA(2012), Background Document to the Opinion on the Annex XV Dossier Proposing Restrictions on Four Phthalates. European Chemical Agency: ECHA(2017), Guidance on the Biocidal Products
Regulation: Vol. III Human Health: Assessment & Evaluation (Parts B+C) Version 4.0.
European Commission(2012), Toxicity and Assessment of Chemical Mixtures. European Commission(2014), Joint Research Centre Science and Policy Reports:
Assessment of Mixtures - Review of Regulatory Requirements and Guidance. European Commission(2016), Joint Research Centre Science Technical Reports:
Review of Case Studies on the Human and Environmental Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixture.
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act(FFDCA) 21 U.S.C. §301.
Garcia-Hidalgo, E. et al.(2018), “Aggregate Consumer Exposure to Isothiazolinones via Household Care and Personal Care Products: Probabilistic Modelling and Benzisothiazolinone Risk Assessment”, Environment International, 118, pp.245-256.
Glen, G. et al.(2012), SHEDS-Residential version 4 Technical Manual, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.
Gosens, I. et al.(2014), “Aggregate Exposure Approaches for Parabens in Personal Care Products: A Case Assessment for Children between 0 and 3 Years Old”, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, 24(2), pp.208-214.
Hartmann, C. et al.(2015), “Human Biomonitoring of Phthalate Exposure in Austrian Children and Adults and Cumulative Risk Assessment”, International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 218(5), pp.489-499.
Health Canada/Environment Canada(2015), Proposed Approach for Cumulative Risk Assessment of Certain Phthalahtes under the Chemicals Management Plan.
Kim, S. et al.(2014), “Urinary Phthalate Metabolites among Elementary School Children of Korea: Sources, Risks, and Their Association with Oxidative Stress Marker”, Science of the Total Environment, 472, pp.49-55
Kim, S. et al.(2015), “Concentrations of Phtalate Metabolites in Breast Milk in Korea: Estimating Exposure to Phthalates and Potential Risks among Breast-fed Infants”, Science of the Total Environment, 508, pp.13-19.
Kruisselbrink et al.(2017), Proposal for a Data Model for Probabilistic Cumulative Dietary Exposure Assessments of Pesticides in Line with the MCRA Software. Lovekamp-Swan, T. and B. J. Davis(2003), “Mechanisms of Phthalate Ester Toxicity
in the Female Reproductive System”, Environmental Health Perspectives, 111, pp.139–45.
Meek, M. E. et al.(2011), “Risk Assessment of Combined Exposure to Multiple Chemicals: A WHO/IPCS Framework”, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 60, pp.S1-S14.
National Research Council(2008), Phthalates and Cumulative Risk Assessment: The Task Ahead.
Nijkamp et al.(2015), “Quantitative Risk Assessment of the Aggregate Dermal Exposure to the Sensitizing Fragrance Geraniol in Personal Care Products and Household Cleaning Agents”, Regulatory Toxicology and Parmacology, 73(1), pp.9-18.
Novigen Sciences, Inc.(2000), Calendex™: Calendar-Based Dietary & Non-Dietary Aggregate and Cummulative Exposure Software System.
Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC.
Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food
and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EECText with EEA relevance.
Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products Text with EEA relevance.
RIVM(2006), Aggregating Human Exposure to Chemicals: An Overview of Tools and Methodologies.
Safford, B. et al.(2017), “Application of the Expanded Creme RIFM Consumer Exposure Model to Fragrance Ingredients in Cosmetic, Personal Care and Air Care Products”, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 86, pp.148-156.
Solecki, R. A. et al.(2017), “Overview on Legislation and Scientific Approaches for Risk Assessment of Mixtures as EuroMix Contribution”, EuroMix Stakeholder Workshop, May 18, Brussels: EuroMix.
Teuschler, L.(2011), “Key Concepts, Theory and Approaches to Chemical Mixture and Cumulative Risk Assessment”, Workshop on Mixture and Cumulative Risk Assessment: New Approaches Using the Latest Science and Thinking about Pathways, July 27-28, Washington D.C.: National Academies of Science.
The Lifeline Group, Inc(2002), LifeLine™ Version 2.0 Technical Manual. Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) 15 U.S.C. §2601 et seq.
Tønning, K. et al.(2009), Survey and Health Assessment of the Exposure of 2 Year-olds to Chemical Substances in Consumer Products, Survey of Chemical Substances in Consumer Products, No.102, Danish EPA.
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission(2014), Report to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission by the Chronic Hazard Advisory Panel on Phthalates and Phthalate Alternative.
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission(2017.10.20), “CPSC Prohibits Certain
Phthalates in Children’s Toys and Child Care Products”.
U.S. EPA(1999), Guidance For Identifying Pesticide Chemicals and Other Substances That Have a Common Mechanism of Toxicity.
U.S. EPA(2001), General Principles For Performing Aggregate Exposure And Risk Assessments.
U.S. EPA(2002), Guidance on Cumulative Risk Assessment of Pesticide Chemicals That Have a Common Mechanism of Toxicity.
U.S. EPA(2003), Framework for Cumulative Risk Assessment.
U.S. EPA(2007), Concepts, Methods and Data Sources for Cumulative Health Risk Assessment of Multiple Chemicals, Exposures and Effects: A Resource Document.
U.S. EPA(2014), Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model User’s Guide.
Van der Voet et al.(2009), “A Model for Probabilistic Health Impact Assessment of Exposure to Food Chemicals”, Food and Chemical Toxicology, 47, pp.2926-2940.
WHO/IPCS(2009), Assessment of Combined Exposures to Multiple Chemicals:
Report of a WHO/IPCS International Workshop on Aggregate/Cumulative Risk Assessment, Geneva.
Xu, Y., E. A. Cohen Hubal, and J. C. Little(2010), “Predicting Residential Exposure to Phthalate Plasticizer Emitted from Vinyl Flooring: Sensitivity, Uncertainty, and Implications for Biomonitoring”, Environmental Health Perspectives, 118(2), pp.253-258.
Young et al.(2012), “Comparison of Four Probabilistic Models to Estimate Aggregate Residential Exposures to Pesticides”, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, 22, pp.522-532.
[온라인 자료]
국가법령정보센터, “생활화학제품 및 살생물제의 안전관리에 관한 법률”, http://www.law.go.
kr/법령/생활화학제품및살생물제의안전관리에관한법률, 검색일: 2018.6.2.
국가법령정보센터, “생활화학제품 및 살생물제의 안전관리에 관한 법률 시행령”, http://www.law.
go.kr/법령/생활화학제품및살생물제의안전관리에관한법률시행령, 검색일: 2018.12.27.
국가법령정보센터, “식품위생법”, http://www.law.go.kr/법령/식품위생법, 검색일: 2018.6.2.
국가법령정보센터, “환경보건법”, http://www.law.go.kr/법령/환경보건법, 검색일: 2018.6.2.
국가법령정보센터, “환경유해인자의 위해성평가를 위한 절차와 방법 등에 관한 지침”, http://
www.law.go.kr/행정규칙/환경유해인자의위해성평가를위한절차와방법등에관한지침 /(585,20160725), 검색일: 2018.6.2.
네이버 국어사전, “누적”, https://ko.dict.naver.com/detail.nhn?docid=8016200, 검색일:
2017.7.27.
Danish EPA, “Fact Sheet: Phthalates in Toys and and Childcare Articles”, https://eng.
mst.dk/chemicals/chemicals-in-products/legal-framework-for-managing-chemicals/fact-sheets/fact-sheet-phthalates-in-toys-and-childcare-articles/, 검색일: 2018.5.23.
Danish EPA, “Chemicals in Products”, https://eng.mst.dk/chemicals/chemicals-in-products, 검색일:2018.6.15.
Danish EPA, “Danish Surveys on Chemicals in Consumer Products”, http://eng.mst.
dk/chemicals/chemicals-in-products/consumers-consumer-products/danish-surveys-on-consumer-products, 검색일: 2018.6.17.
법제처, “생활화학제품 및 살생물제의 안전관리에 관한 법률 시행규칙 제정(안)”, http://www.m oleg.go.kr/lawinfo/lawNotice/lawNoticeInfo?ogLmPpSeq=45791&mappingLbi cId=0&announceType=TYPE5&pageIndex=&rowIdx=818, 검색일: 2018.06.20.
생활환경안전정보시스템, “위해우려제품 제품기준”, http://ecolife.me.go.kr/ecolife/idcInjry
WrrPrd/injryWrrPrdStndrdIndex, 검색일: 2018.7.25.
연합뉴스(2016.7.22.), “독성물질 ‘OIT’ 함유필터 에어컨·공기청정기 84개 모델 유통”, http:/
/www.yonhapnews.co.kr/bulletin/2016/07/22/0200000000AKR2016072205 0600004.HTML, 검색일:2018.6.11.
Government of Canada, “Phthalate Substance Grouping”, https://www.canada.ca/en/
health-canada/services/chemical-substances/substance-groupings-initiative/
phthalate.html, 검색일: 2018.8.30.
CARES NG, “Aggregate / Cumulative”, http://caresng.org/models/aggregate-cumulative/, 검색일: 2018.10.11.
Creme Global, “Creme RIFMTM” https://www.cremeglobal.com/products/creme-rifm/, 검색일: 2018.6.14.
Creme Global, “Creme CareTM” https://www.cremeglobal.com/products/creme-care-cosmetics/, 검색일: 2018.6.20, 2018.9.20.
JTBC뉴스(2017.8.30), “생리대 ‘실험 결과표’ 보니 조사대상 모두 ‘유해물질’”, http://news.
jtbc.joins.com/article/article.aspx?news_id=NB11515148, 검색일: 2018.6.11.
RIVM, “Monte Carlo Risk Assessment(MCRA)”, https://www.rivm.nl/en/Topics/F/Fo od_safety/Chemicals_in_food/Monte_Carlo_Risk_Assessment_MCRA, 검색일:
2018.9.20.
Scientific American(2014.10.6), “Should People Be Concerned about Parabens in Beau ty Products?”, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/should-people-be-con cerned-about-parabens-in-beauty-products/, 검색일: 2018.9.11.
The Lifeline Group, http://www.thelifelinegroup.org/, 검색일: 2018.3.28.
U.S. EPA, “Stochastic Human Exposure and Dose Simulation (SHEDS) to Estimate Human Exposure to Chemicals”, https://www.epa.gov/chemical-research/stochastic-huma n-exposure-and-dose-simulation-sheds-estimate-human-exposure, 검색일: 2018.4.2.
U.S. EPA, “Exposure Assessment Tools by Tiers and Types: Aggregate and Cumulative”, https://www.epa.gov/expobox/exposure-assessment-tools-tiers-and-types-aggregate-and-cumulative, 검색일: 2018.6.16.
Utah Department of Agriculture and Food, “Federal Pesticide Law”, https://web.
archive.org/web/20120105081622/http://ag.utah.gov/divisions/plant/pesticide/
CoreManual/Chapter2.pdf, 검색일: 2018.3.17.
Abstract
Study on the Cumulative Risk Assessment for Safety Management of Household Chemical Products
Dawoon Jung et al.
Recent scares involving health damage from exposure to chemicals in living environments, exemplified by the humidifier disinfectant accident, has increased people’s mistrust of biocidal products and household chemical products. Accordingly, the demand for tighter regulation, as well as better management of such products also increased. The purpose of this study was to develop a methodology that utilizes cumulative risk assessment to comprehensively evaluate the risk of chemicals contained in household products, thereby enhancing the safety management of them.
First, we recognized that “cumulative exposure and risk assessment” is used interchangeably with “mixture exposure and risk assessment” and
“aggregate exposure and risk assessment“ in Korea. Therefore, we came up with the terms “cumulative exposure of a single substance” and “cumulative exposure of multiple substances” to represent “aggregate exposure” and
“cumulative exposure,” respectively. Similarly, we defined “cumulative risk assessment of a single substance” and “cumulative risk assessment of multiple substances” to represent “aggregate risk assessment” and
“cumulative risk assessment,” respectively. Next, we reviewed the status of research related to cumulative risk assessment in Korea. Although studies on cumulative risk assessments have been active, most studies were limited to
studies on single substance cumulative risk assessments. In addition, the results of the research did not lead to any implementation of law or policy.
Our analysis of the implementation of cumulative risk assessment in regulation showed that only the Ministry of Environment mentions
Our analysis of the implementation of cumulative risk assessment in regulation showed that only the Ministry of Environment mentions