• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Closure of Atrial Septal Defects with the Recent Generation Devices

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Closure of Atrial Septal Defects with the Recent Generation Devices"

Copied!
2
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

336 https://e-kcj.org

The Amplatzer

®

septal occluder (ASO; St. Jude Medical Inc., Plymouth, MN, USA) is a self-expanding, double-disk device with a self-centering mechanism, which is evolved into the dominant closure device of secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) following the initial clinical report in 1997.

1)

Further generations including Occlutech Figulla

®

Flex II device (FSO;

Occlutech GmbH, Jena, Germany) and Gore

®

Cardioform Septal Occluder (GSO; W.L.Gore

& Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) have followed with design modifications leading to lack of a left sided-hub leading to a softer left-sided disc, less frictional forces against erosion and greater flexibility of the device following deployment.

2)

Despite of the FSO and GSO are widely accepted as the suitable treatment for ASDs, little is known about the feasibility and safety of these recent generation devices compare to those of predominantly used ASO devices. Hence, this comprehensive comparison study of the 3 devices by Kim et al.

3)

is both informative and timely.

They compared the clinical outcomes and complications of transcatheter ASD closure using the FSO, GSO, and the established ASO device, in 267 patients divided into 3 groups according to the respective devices implanted in a retrospective, single center setting. The follow-up period ranged from 23 to 29 months in the 3 groups. Of the 3 devices, the FSO was the most commonly implanted device (n=152, 56.9%), then followed by the ASO (n=98, 36.7%) and the GSO (n=17, 6.4%). The patients in the GSO group were significantly younger, had smaller mean defect size, and no pre-procedural tricuspid regurgitation compared to the other groups. The major complication rates (%) in the ASO, FSO, and GSO groups were less than 1%, respectively and the authors report no mid-term complications occurring during the follow-up period. Based on their results, the authors conclude that the FSO and GSO are feasible options for transcatheter ASD closure, and comparable to the ASO.

This study deserves attention in that it provides the similar clinical outcomes of transcatheter ASD closure in Korean patients using new devices such as the FSO and GSO in comparison to that of the established ASO device because of the scarce data regarding the reports on the use of the FSO and GSO in Korean patients. Also noteworthy is the first to report the early to mid-term outcomes of using the FSO to close secundum ASDs (n=152) in Korean patients, even including small children. These results suggest that recent generation ASO devices offer great practical Korean Circ J. 2019 Apr;49(4):336-337

https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2019.0077 pISSN 1738-5520·eISSN 1738-5555

Editorial

Received: Mar 2, 2019 Accepted: Mar 6, 2019 Correspondence to Jang Young Kim, MD, PhD

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, 20 Ilsan-ro, Wonju 26426, Korea.

E-mail: [email protected]

Copyright © 2019. The Korean Society of Cardiology

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://

creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

ORCID iDs Jang Young Kim

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0813-7082 Conflict of Interest

The author has no financial conflicts of interest.

The contents of the report are the author's own views and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Korean Circulation Journal.

Jang Young Kim , MD, PhD

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea

Closure of Atrial Septal Defects with the Recent Generation Devices

See the article “Early to Mid-Term Follow-Up Outcomes of Percutaneous Closure of Atrial Septal

Defects Using Recent Generation Devices: a Single-Center Experience” in volume 49 on page 326.

(2)

clinical value, and they could use them to be therapeutic alternatives by verifying their efficacy and safety with various morphologies in selected patients with feasible anatomy.

3)

Some limitations of this study should be considered. First, the study was restricted to a single center experience. These findings may not be generalizable to other centers, particularly to those with relative small volume centers, or without an experienced interventionist.

Second, this study is subject to selection bias with retrospective observations. As the authors mentioned, the selection of the device was based on the standard treatment guideline, rather than on randomization. Therefore, it needs a large randomized controlled trial stratifying the defect size, the number of defect and the presence of retro-aortic rim deficiency. Finally, the follow-up of this cohort was about 2 years, and the authors could not evaluate longer follow- up data. It also needs the long-term outcomes of recent general ASD devices or subsequent postmarketing studies of the devices.

REFERENCES

1. Masura J, Gavora P, Formanek A, Hijazi ZM. Transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects using the new self-centering amplatzer septal occluder: Initial human experience. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997;42:388-93.

PUBMED | CROSSREF

2. Jung SY, Choi JY. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect: principles and available devices. J Thorac Dis 2018;10:S2909-S2922.

PUBMED | CROSSREF

3. Kim AY, Jung SY, Chang JY, Jung JW, Choi JY. Early to mid-term follow-up outcomes of percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects using recent generation devices: a single-center experience. Korean Circ J 2019;49:326-35.

PUBMED | CROSSREF

337 https://e-kcj.org https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2019.0077

Feasibility of New Septal Occluder Devices

참조

관련 문서

1) Hoffman JI, Christianson R. Congenital heart disease in a cohort of 19,502 births with long-term follow-up. The era of transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects.

We report a case of percutaneous Amplazter Septal Occluder (ASO; St. Jude Medical Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota, USA) device closure for an ASD with a thin and floppy interatrial

► See the article “Reversibility of Pulmonary Hypertension Following Surgical Atrial Septal Defect Closure in Children with Down Syndrome” in volume 27 on page 247... In an

Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure in the Presence of Thrombus Using LAmbre Device and Cerebral Protection System..

The GSO has been continuously available for interventional ASD closure in the European market since 2011, and it has achieved feasible, effective implantation in patients with ASD.

The absolute contraindication for transcatheter closure of ASD is mitral rim deficiency because of mitral valve touching/erosion and the defect more than 40 mm. Also, the

In the first case described above, we used two ASOs. The larger defect was closed first, because the smaller defect was detected after closure of the larger defect. Most

Patients with an atrial septal defect (ASD) and severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are considered ineligible for defect closure surgery because of the