1) * **
? A
2006 285 ,
21.68% 10 .
14km/h
1), ,
.
(external costs)
, 1996 1, 3
.
.
.
* Texas A&M **
1) 2005 22.9km/h, 14km/h, 23.5km/h (
).
Wuestefeld and Regan(1981) : -0.03 -0.31
: -0.15 -0.31 16
Jones(1992) : -0.22
: -0.45
Harvey(1994) : -0.05 -0.15
: -0.10 Hirschman et al.(1995) -0.09 -0.50
: -0.25 6 , 2
Gifford and Talkington(1996) : -0.18 : -0.09
Cain et al.(2001) : -0.03 -0.36 2
Loo(2003) -0.10 -0.29 6
Matas and Raymond(2003) -0.21 -0.83
1, 3 ,
,
. .
1, 3 10 ,
.
. Oum et al.(1992) Goodwin(1992) , ,
. Oum et al.(1992)
60 , -0.13
-0.45, -0.09 -0.52, -0.14 -0.36 .
, , , .
. < 1> ,
.
(shrinkage ratio) (Wuestefeld and Regan, 1981; Jones, 1992;
Cain et al., 2001) (Hirschman et al., 1995; Gifford
and Talkington, 1996; Loo, 2003; Matas and Raymond, 2003) ,
-0.2 -0.3 .
. ( , , )
(Harvey, 1994). Wuestefeld and Regan
(1981) , ,
. Hirschman et al.(1995) ,
. Loo(2003) Hirschman et al.(1995)
, .
. Gifford and Talkington(1996)
, Cain et al.(2001) .
. Harvey(1994) ,
.
, 1, 3
.
, (1998), (2001) .
(2006)
, .
. 1, 3 (3
)
.
¯ƒ
:
ƒ:
ƒ
:
ƒ:
¢ƒ
: 1
ƒ:
ĺ£ſƌz ĺ§ƍƔ
: 1 11
Ľ¡
: ( =1, =0)
ĽÏ
: 2 ( =1, =0)
ĽƁƆ ƃƍƌƅſƃ
: ( =1)
ĽƑƑƏ
: ( =1)
ĽƁſƐ
: ( =1)
ƃƔ
: 1)
1, 3 ( ) ( )
.
, ,
.
1, 3 (double log)
.
. (1) .
¯ƒá ĸ×â ĸ΃â ĸσâ ĸÐÞ ƒî¢ƒß â ĸуâ ĸÒĺ£ſƌâ ĸÓĺƃƀ
âzâĸÎÒĺ§ƍƔâ ĸÎÓĽ¡â ĸÎÔĽÏâ ĸÎÕĽƁƆ ƃƍƌƅſƃâ ĸÎÖĽƑƑƏâ ĸÏ׼ƁſƐâ ƃƇ
(1)
,
.
.
ĸÎ.
2)
, 3 , , ,
.
(2) .
¯ƒá ĸƍâ ĸ΃? â ?Ï ƒâ ĸТƒâ ĸÑ«ƒâ ĸÒƒâ ĸÓĺ£ſƌâ ĸÔĺƃƀ
âzâ ĸÎÓĺ§ƍƔâ ĸÎÔĽ¡â ĸÎÕĽÏâ ĸÎÖĽƁƆ ƃƍƌƅſƃâ ĸÏ׼ƑƑƏâ ĸÏÎĽƁſƐâ ƃƁ
§¯ƒá ķ×â ĸÏ ƒâ ķТƒâ ķÑ«ƒâ ķÒƒâ ķÓĺ£ſƌâ ķÔĺƃƀ
âzâ ķÎÓĺ§ƍƔâ ķÎÔĽ¡â ķÎÕĽÏâ ķÎÖĽƁƆ ƃƍƌƅſƃâ ķÏ׼ƑƑƏâ ķÏÎĽƁſƐâ ƃ§
(2)
,
¯ƒ:
§¯ƒ:
ƒ
:
«ƒ:
ƃì ƃ§
:
(zero) ,
(OLS: Ordinary Least Square) .
(GLS: Generalized Least Square)
(SUR: Seemingly Unrelated Regression) .
2)SUR
,
ňƁÏì ň§Ïì ň §Ï.
GLS . SUR
,
( , 2004).
2) SUR (pooling)
,
(joint) .
, . .
͡
͢͡͝͡͡͡
ͣ͡͝͡͡͡
ͤ͡͝͡͡͡
ͥ͡͝͡͡͡
ͦ͡͝͡͡͡
ͧ͡͝͡͡͡
ͨ͡͝͡͡͡
ͩ͡͝͡͡͡
ͪ͡͝͡͡͡
͢͡͡͝͡͡͡
ͪͪͧ͢ ͪͪͨ͢ ͪͪͩ͢ ͪͪͪ͢ ͣ͡͡͡ ͣ͢͡͡ ͣͣ͡͡ ͣͤ͡͡ ͣͥ͡͡ ͣͦ͡͡ 噊
皻窏峏͙堆͠滛朞柢儊͚ 凊 ͢笾瘶嘖 ͤ笾瘶嘖
1, 3
1996 11 2006 6
, 116 . 1, 3
, 4 2000 11
. 2001 4 (5
10 ) 1, 3 2000 11,869 (-13.6%)
. 2003 7 ,
1 2,335 (-6.6%) 3 1,711
(+4.4%) . 2004 3 2003
3,424 (-8.4%) , 1 9,104 .
1 , 3
.
... -+- -+-
͡
͢͡͝͡͡͡
ͣ͡͝͡͡͡
ͤ͡͝͡͡͡
ͥ͡͝͡͡͡
ͦ͡͝͡͡͡
ͧ͡͝͡͡͡
ͨ͡͝͡͡͡
ͪͪͧ͢ ͪͪͨ͢ ͪͪͩ͢ ͪͪͪ͢ ͣ͡͡͡ ͣ͢͡͡ ͣͣ͡͡ ͣͤ͡͡ ͣͥ͡͡ ͣͦ͡͡ 噊
皻窏峏͙堆͠滛朞柢儊͚ 滛朞焮峏 彺洢焮峏
1, 3
< 2> .
,
. 2001
. 2004 7
50% .
1, 3 < 3> ,
25.3% . ,
  .
1, 3 3 (HOV)
. 3 < 4> ,
5.7% 2004 13.6% , 79.5%
. 2001 4 7 10
6 , 7
.
... • ...
: /4 , %
96.11 97.11 98.11 01.11 02.11 03.11 04.11
23,752 (100)
21,960 (100)
23,205 (100)
22,592 (100)
22,841 (100)
22,860 (100)
25,354 (100) 18,628
(78.4)
13,070 (59.5)
12,260 (52.9)
13,107 (58.0)
12,675 (55.5)
12,741 (55.7)
13,910 (54.9) 792
(3.3)
1,148 (5.2)
1,285 (5.5)
1,174 (5.2)
1,332 (5.8)
1,281 (5.6)
2,222 (8.8) 1,848
(7.8)
4,178 (19.0)
5,759 (24.8)
4,853 (21.5)
5,667 (24.8)
5,135 (22.5)
6,082 (24.0) 2,484
(10.5)
3,564 (16.3)
3,901 (16.8)
3,458 (15.3)
3,167 (13.9)
3,703 (16.2)
3,140 (12.4)
: 1) 11 2 , < 1> .
2) 4 (07:00 09:00, 17:00 19:00) .
3) ( ) (%) .
: .
1, 3
: / , % 96.11
( )
97.11
( 1 )
98.11
( 2 )
99.11
( 3 )
00.11
( 4 )
01.11
( 5 )
02.11
( 6 )
03.11
( 7 )
04.11
( 8 )
05.11
( 9 )
1,3
- 28,313 (39.2)
24,399 (32.4)
24,822 (30.1)
24,694 (28.2)
28,403 (37.5)
28,241 (37.8)
26,229 (35.4)
30,150 (37.8)
37,286 (40.2) - 43,957
(60.8)
50,878 (67.6)
57,576 (69.9)
62,842 (71.8)
47,264 (62.5)
46,387 (62.2)
47,775 (64.6)
49,533 (62.2)
55,449 (59.8) 90,404 72,270 75,276 82,399 87,536 75,667 74,627 74,004 79,683 92,734
1
- 13,070 (39.6)
12,315 (33.3)
12,139 (30.6)
11,761 (28.1)
13,578 (37.9)
13,335 (37.5)
11,305 (34.0)
15,648 (36.9)
20,663 (40.0) - 19,935
(60.4)
24,613 (66.7)
27,470 (69.4)
30,075 (71.9)
22,295 (62.1)
22,267 (62.5)
21,962 (66.0)
26,723 (63.1)
31,055 (60.0) 39,982 33,005 36,929 39,609 41,836 35,873 35,602 33,267 42,371 51,717
3
- 15,243 (38.8)
12,083 (31.5)
12,684 (29.6)
12,934 (28.3)
14,825 (37.3)
14,905 (38.2)
14,924 (36.6)
14,501 (38.9)
16,623 (40.5) - 24,022
(61.2)
26,264 (68.5)
30,106 (70.4)
32,766 (71.7)
24,969 (62.7)
24,120 (61.8)
25,812 (63.4)
22,810 (61.1)
24,394 (59.5) 50,422 39,265 38,348 42,790 45,700 39,794 39,025 40,736 37,312 41,017
: 1) 07:00 21:00 ( / ) .
2) 1996. 11. · (2001) .
3) ( ) (%) .
: .
1, 3
: /4 , %
96.11 97.11 98.11 01.11 02.11 03.11 04.11
18,628 (100)
11,874 (100)
13,068 (100)
13,107 (100)
12,675 (100)
12,741 (100)
13,910 (100)
2 17,571
(94.3)
10,470 (80.1)
9,671 (78.9)
10,735 (81.9)
10,130 (79.9)
10,626 (83.4)
12,012 (86.4)
3 1,057
(5.7)
2,598 (19.9)
2,589 (21.1)
2,372 (18.1)
2,544 (20.1)
2,116 (16.6)
1,898 (13.6)
: 1) 4 (07:00 09:00, 17:00 19:00) .
2) ( ) (%) .
: .
1, 3
07:00 21:00 07:00 15:00 ,
2 ( ) 10
3 11
, , , ( , )
, , ,
2,000 ( )
800cc 1000 (2003. 7. 25)
1000 (2004. 7. 1)
(20,000 , 11 ), (10,000 , 11 )
1) (
ƒ)
1, 3 1996 11
2,000 . 10 2,000
. 2,000
(2006 6 =100) .
1, 3 5 ,
< 5> . 2,000 , 50% 1,000 ,
11 10 9.1% 1,818 , 909 , 3
.
. ,
< 3> < 4> .
1,200
•••
0•
""0 。 니\ι
800. 0 γ1
~、
v\ r---
&00. 0
‘
000200. 0
‘
12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12’
6 9 12’
69 12 3 69 1α 3 6 9 12’
6 9 12’
6 912 3 6 912’
1997 199내 1999 2000 200
’
2002 2003 2004 200~. ..
3,000 0
r--..、
2.500 o
0
」
~、‘
2,000
• '""
o
• 000 0
'""
‘
12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 31997 199B 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 200~
1
2) 1 (
¢ƒ)
.
1 . 1
(2006 6 =100) ,
.
1 < 5> , IMF 1997
.
3) (
ƒ)
.
, , LPG
3)4)
.
,
. < 6> . 1997 12 1998 3 1998 9 1998
10 .
3) (www.petroleum.or.kr).
4) ( , ).
소"원) L 2Uαm 0
'""
1. 00αm
~"ι""
'""
'"ι"" a
‘oι""
'"ι""
|냥l 、r
、j、\..J 、」 | ν-‘」
v
‘
12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 •2 3 6 9 •2 3 6 9 •, ,1997
’
998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005( / )
4) (
ƒ)
, ,
. 1, 3
. < 7>
, IMF 1997 5
.
를’ Jf~(앤) 1.60
1 ‘。
1,20
1,00
、、/
800
8끼O
‘
002띠O
/、
IV
/ ‘
/ '
1--. ι〈v
、----
iI 12 3 6 9 12 3 6
’
12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 lZ 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3진영 5200
5000
4900
4600
4400
4200
4000
3900
'99
’
1998’
999 2000 200’
2002 2003 2004 2005~ J이
1""1기 λ〈
F\
fγ\ “νz v/ \
\ j
~
ι‘
‘
12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 •2 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 31997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
5) (
«ƒ)
.
, < 8> .
6) (
ƒ)
.
.
.
7)
1, 3 ,
, , .
,
. <
6> .
2 1, 3
.
이
‘
12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 •2 3 6 9 •2 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3’
997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2뼈 2004 2005Ľ¡ 1999.2 2006.6 -
ĽÏ 1999.2 2001.5 2 +
ĽƁƆ ƃƍƌƅſƃ 2003.7 2005.9 -
Ľ¬ƑƏ 2004.3 2004.5 -
Ľ ſƐ 2004.7 2006.6 +
ĺ£ſƌ ĺ§ƍƔ +/-
.
“ 50% ”
.
.
. .
< 7> 1, 3
1 , 3
. F- 0.000 “
”
. (
ć«Ï) 0.71 0.86 .
Hirschmann et al.(1995)
(
«Ï: 0.70 0.96) Loo(2003) (
«Ï: 0.83 0.97)
.
<
8> 0.805,
0.753 .
1, 3 1 3
6.880** 0.000 9.008** 0.000 3.879** 0.004
Log( ) -0.318** 0.000 -0.359** 0.000 -0.240** 0.000
Log( î¢ ) 0.108* 0.074 0.197** 0.014 0.037 0.468
Log( ) 0.920** 0.000 0.773** 0.007 0.998** 0.000
Log( ) -0.090 0.290 -0.207* 0.078 0.020 0.777
ĺ£ſƌ -0.037** 0.004 -0.038** 0.031 -0.036** 0.001
ĺƓƅ -0.026* 0.052 -0.020 0.262 -0.030** 0.008
Ľ¡ -0.013 0.505 0.012 0.636 -0.033** 0.047
ĽÏ 0.061** 0.000 0.038** 0.033 0.085** 0.000
ĽƁƆƃƍƌƅſƃ -0.066** 0.000 -0.127** 0.000 -0.006 0.550
Ľ¬ƑƏ -0.054** 0.045 -0.023 0.520 -0.076** 0.001
ĽſƐ 0.093** 0.000 0.277** 0.000 -0.085** 0.000
ć«Ï 0.802 0.862 0.714
D-W 0.823 0.806 1.148
à ƔſƊƓƃ 43.477 66.298 27.095
à ƑƇƅí 0.000 0.000 0.000
: ** * 0.05 0.10 .
.
, .
(+) , 0.01 .
. 0.01
. 0.729, -0.418
, . 10%
7.3% , 4.2% .
1, 3 .
3
3.323 0.457 6.566** 0.006
LOG( ) -0.333* 0.100
LOG( ) 0.113 0.180 0.113 0.180
LOG(¢ ) 0.729** 0.000 -0.418** 0.000
LOG(« ) 0.089 0.660 0.605** 0.000
LOG( ) -0.405** 0.003 0.056 0.631
ĺ£ſƌ -0.120** 0.000 -0.022 0.314
ĺƃƀ -0.087** 0.000 0.005 0.821
ĺ¦ſƐ -0.042* 0.092 0.005 0.811
ĺƎƐ 0.008 0.733 -0.027 0.217
ĺ¦ſƗ 0.005 0.823 -0.036 0.103
ĺ£Ɠƌƃ -0.023 0.335 -0.014 0.524
ĺ£ƓƊƗ -0.051** 0.044 -0.014 0.539
ĺƓƅ -0.076** 0.002 -0.025 0.259
ĺ¬ƃƎ 0.007 0.770 -0.007 0.752
ĺ¨Ɓƒ 0.000 0.983 0.003 0.872
ĺ§ƍƔ 0.000 0.979 -0.011 0.594
Ľ¡ 0.008 0.807 -0.065** 0.038
ĽÏ -0.035 0.184 0.214** 0.000
ĽƁƆƃƍƌƅſƃ -0.112** 0.000 -0.029* 0.070
Ľ¬ƑƏ -0.168** 0.000 0.096** 0.004
ĽſƐ 0.213** 0.000 0.066** 0.025
ć«Ï 0.805 0.753
D-W 0.841 1.082
: ** * 0.05 0.10 .
.
1 8
, . 1 8
. .
2
, .
.
, (-)
. ,
.
, .
-0.24 -0.36 ,
-0.33 .
Oum et al.(1992) (-0.13 -0.45), (-0.1
4 -0.36), (-0.09 -0.52) , Hirschman et al.(1995) (-0.13 -0.50)
Loo (2003) (-0.10 -0.29) .
, .
, 1, 3
(OLS) .
,
(SUR) .
,
.
-0.24 -0.36 ,
. 1, 3
, .
. ,
,
. , ,
. ,
1, 3
.
(2002), “ ”, .
( ), “ ”.
(2001), “ ”, .
(2002), “ ”, .
(2004), “ ”, .
(2005), “Eviews ”, .
(2006), “ ”, .
( ), “ ”.
(1998), “ ”,
.
Cain, A., M. W. Burris and R. M. Pendyala (2001), “Impact of Variable Pricing on Temporal Distribution of Travel Demand”, Transportation Research Record, 1747, pp. 36-43.
Gifford, J. L. and S. W. Talkington(1996), “Demand Elasticity under Time-Varying Prices: Case study of Day-of-Week Varying Tolls on Golden Gate Bridge”, Transportation Research Record, 1558, pp. 55-59.
Goodwin, P. B.(1992), “A Review of New Demand Elasticities with Special Reference to Short and Long Run Effects of Price Changes”, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 26, pp.
155-170.
Harvey, G.(1994), “Transportation Pricing Behavior, Curbing Gridlock: Peak-Period Fees to Relieve Traffic Congestion”, Transportation Research Board, Special Report 242, pp. 89-114.
Hirschman, I., C. McKnight, J. Pucher, R. E. Paaswell and J. Berechman(1995), “Bridge and Tunnel Toll Elasticities in New York: Some Recent Evidence”, Transportation, Vol. 22, pp. 97-113.
Hirschman, I., J. Pucher and K. Baker(1993), “Factors Affecting Motor Vehicle Travel into New York City's CBD”, Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 47, pp. 61-77.
Ison, S. and T. Rye(2005), “Implementing Road User Charging: The Lessons Learnt from Hong Kong, Cambridge, and Central London”, Transport Reviews, Vol. 25, pp. 451-466.
Jones, P.(1992), “Restraining Car Traffic in European Cities: An Emerging Role for Road Pricing”, Transportation Research A, Vol. 26A, pp. 133-145.
Litman, T.(2006), “Transportation Elasticities: How Prices and Other Factors Affect Travel Behavior”,
Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
Loo, B. P. Y.(2003), “Tunnel Traffic and Toll Elasticities in Hong Kong: Some Recent Evidence for International Comparisons”, Environment and Planning A, Vol. 35, pp. 249-276.
Matas, A. and J. Raymond(2003), “Demand Elasticity on Tolled Motorways”, Journal of Transportation and Statistics, Vol. 6, pp. 91-108.
Oum, T. H. (1989), “Alternative Demand Models and Their Elasticity Estimates”, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 13, pp. 163-187.
Oum, T. H., W. G. Waters II and J. S. Yong(1992), “Concepts of Price Elasticities of Transport Demand and Recent Empirical Estimates: An Interpretative Survey”, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 26, pp. 139-154.
Wuestefeld, N. H. and E. J. Regan III(1981), “Impact of Rate Increases on Toll Facilities”, Traffic Quarterly, Vol. 35, pp. 639-655.