• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

ApplicationForm "2013GlobalKoreanYouthNetwork"

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "ApplicationForm "2013GlobalKoreanYouthNetwork""

Copied!
1
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

"2013 Global Korean Youth Network"

Application Form

Name

(Korean) Photo

(English)

(Native language)

Date of Birth year month date

Gender □ Male □ Female

Nationality Place of

Residence The near Embassy or

Consulate Passport NO.

(Date of Issue) (Date of expiry)

Tel FAX

E-mail Mobile

The Name of School Grade/Major

Type of Student □ Middle □ High □ University

Language Ability

Native Language :

Korean : □ Fluent □ Good □ Fair □ Poor English : □ Fluent □ Good □ Fair □ Poor

Health

Did you have any health problem, recently? □ Yes □No

‘If Yes’ →

Dietary restrictions :

Allergies or Medical conditions : Emergency

Contact in Korea

Name Relationship

Tel Address

Did you participate in this program in the past? □ Yes ( year ) □ No How did you know about this program?

Etc ※ Skills, Volunteer Experience and Etc.

참조

관련 문서

Association between levels of physical activity and poor self-rated health in Korean adults: The Third Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

According to several previous studies, SRH is considered a good in- dicator of future health and health care utilization. 3,4) Moreover, poor SRH has been shown to

In a study that involved subcutaneous treatment using a 1,064 nm laser, malodor elimination was good in four patients (33.3%), fair in eight patients (66.7%), and poor in no

“Good” by Modified Macnab criteria, † Dissatisfied patient: Patients who were evaluated “Fair” or “Poor” by Modified Macnab criteria and who undergone revision

length, volar tilt and ulnar variance for effective analysis. Results: There have been two cases in excellent, eigh- teen good, twelve fair and one poor in subjective evalua-

According to Cassebaum’s classification for elbow range of motion, 7 cases were rated very good, 1 cases were good, 4 cases were fair, and 1 cases were poor.. Of the 3 patients

SRH was assessed by a single-item health measure with five options: “very good,” “good,” “fair,” “bad,” and “very bad.” The differences in prevalence of

Table 4.2 Estimated item-response probabilities in LTM Status prevalence at time 1 well done Korean medium poor well done Math medium poor well done English medium poor Interest