Subsequently, implant supported fixed prosthesis was delivered to the patient
전체 글
(2) ᯕჩ᷾ಡᨱᕽ۵⦹ᦦᨱᯝᇡ᳕⊹aᯩᮥĞᬑᔢ. * 서론. ᦦŝ⦹ᦦ༉ࢱᯥ⥭✙Łᱶᅕ℁ྜྷᮥᯕᬊ⦹ᩍᙹ ᅖ⦽Ğᬑಽ⊹ഭ᯲ᱥ↽᳦ᅕ℁ྜྷᮥŁಅ⦽⊹ഭĥ ⫮ᮥ☖⧕ᝍၙᱢ ʑ܆ᱢᯙอ᳒qᮥᵥᙹᯩᨩ݅. ᝍ. ⦽⊹ᵝḩ⪹ᯕӹ݅ᙹ᮹ᇩపᅕ℁ྜྷಽ᳕ ⊹ᦥ᮹ၽÑaᇩa⦝⦹ᩍྕ⊹ᦦᯕࡹ۵Ğ ᬑⅾ᮹⊹ ᯥ⥭✙ḡḡPWFSEFOUVSF ᯥ⥭. ** 증례보고. ✙ḡḡŁᱶᖒᅕ℁ྜྷ᮹ႊჶᵲ⦹ӹ᮹Ğᬑෝ┾⧕ ⊹ഭෝḥ⧪⧁ᙹᯩ݅ੱ⦽r᯲ᜅ్ᬕྕ⊹ᦦᔢ┽ᨱ ⧕ݡⓑᔢᝅqᮥw۵݅ᗭӹᯕaᱫᮡᩍᯱ⪹ᯱ᮹Ğ. ᖙ᮹ᩍᯱ⪹ᯱaᱥၹᱢᯙǍvᔢ┽᮹}ᖁᮥᬱ⦹. ᬑⅾ᮹⊹ಽ⊹ഭෝḥ⧪⦹۵äᅕ݅۵݅ᙹ᮹ᯥ⥭✙. ŁŁᱶᖒᅕ℁ྜྷᮥᬱ⦽݅۵ᵝᗭಽԕᬱ⦹ᩡŁ ᱥၹ. ෝᯕᬊ⦽Łᱶᖒᅕ℁ᙹᅖ᮹Ğᬑᝍญᱢ ʑ܆ᱢอ᳒. ᱢᯙBMWFPMBSCPOFSFTPSQUJPOᮥᅕᯕŁᯩᨩ݅ᔢᦦ᮹. . qᮥ׳ᯝᙹᯩ݅ . Ğᬑ᳕⊹᮹ᱥᦦၽ⊹ ⦹ᦦ᮹Ğᬑ᳭⊂č⊹ᇡ░ᬑ. ə్ӹ᳕ʼnᯕᇡ᳒⧁Ğᬑᯥ⥭✙ෝᯕᬊ⦽Łᱶ ᖒᅕ℁ᙹᅖᯕᝍၙᱢᯙᝅ➉ෝʑ⧁ᙹᯩ۵ߑᯕ۵ ↽᳦ᱢᯙᅕ℁ᙹᅖྜྷŝ᳕ʼne᮹šĥ᮹⠪aaᔍ. ⊂ᱽᗭǍ⊹ෝᱽ⦽Ǎ⊹ᇡ᮹⊹ᦥၽ⊹ෝĥ⫮⦹ᩡ ݅ 'JH 4UVEZNPEFMᮥᇥᕾ⦽đŝᅙ᷾ಡ᮹ĞᬑᦦeŖe. ᱥᨱᯕᨕḡḡᦫᦹʑভྙᯕ݅ə్အಽ⊹ഭ᯲. ᮡNNᯕԕಽᕽŁᱶᖒᮝಽᙹᅖa⧉܆ᮥᙹᯩ. ᱥᅕ℁ĥ⫮ᯕᖙᬭᲙ⦹໑݅᧲⦽ḥ݉ᇥᕾᮥ☖⧕. ᨩ݅ᔢᦦྕ⊹ᦦᇡ᭥⊹ᦥ႑ᩕ⬥Ǎᙽḡḡࠥෝ⪶ᯙ. ฿ᮡ⊹ഭ᧲ᮥᱢᬊ⧕⦽݅ . ⧕ᅙđŝGBDJBMQSPGJMFᯕᱢᱩ⦹ᩡᮝ໑ MJQMJOFᯕԏᦥ. ੱ⦽ᯥ⥭✙พᮥ᭥⦽ᙹᚁᱥ݉ĥᨱᕽᨕਁ⦽ ⊹ഭႊᮥđᱶ⧁äᯙa۵ᙹᅖ⦹Łᯱ⦹۵Ŗe᮹᧲ ŝࠥšಉᯕᯩ݅ᕽ᪥ᱥྕ⊹ᦦᨱᯥ⥭✙ෝ. ᔢ⦹ᦦ༉ࢱᯥ⥭✙Łᱶᖒᅕ℁ྜྷಽḥ⧪⦹ʑಽ⦹ᩡ ݅ 'JH ⊹ᵝḩ⪹ᮝಽᱥၹᱢᮝಽ⊹᳑ʼn᮹⯂ᙹෝᅕᯕ໑✚. พ⦹ᩍᙹᅖ⦹Łᯱ⦽݅໕ᗭᝅࡽ⊹ᦥၰᵝ᭥᳑Ḣ᮹. ⯩᳭⊂⦹ᦦǍ⊹ᇡᇡ᭥⊹᳑ʼn᮹ᝍb⦽⯂ᙹaᅕᩡ. ᧲ᮥᨕ۱ᱶࠥၙญʼnᯕᮥ☖⦹ᩍ⫭ᅖ⧁äᯙḡᦥ. ݅. ܩ໕ᅕ℁ᙹᅖྜྷಽᗭᝅࡽᇡ᭥ෝݡℕ⧁äᯙḡෝᔍᱥ. ᅙ᷾ಡᨱᕽ۵PWPJE⩶┽᮹ᦦǢŝ⊹⧊ݡaŁᱶᖒ. ᨱá☁⧕⦽݅ᯕᨱࠥᦦ⧊ݡǢᔢ┽ พ⧁ᇡ᭥. ᅕ℁ྜྷᯙᱱ əญŁQSFNBYJMMB᮹BOUFSJPSQPTUFSJPS. ᮹ʼnḩ əญŁ⪹ᯱ᮹Ğᱽᱢᔢ┽ࠥŁಅ⧕⦽݅. TQSFBEෝŁಅ⦹ᩍᔢᦦᨱ}᮹ᯥ⥭✙ෝพ⦹ʑ. Fig. 1. (A) Panorama view shows generalized alveolar bone loss. (B) Intraoral photo shows deep caries. A. B. Na Ree Yoon et al. : Oral Rehabilitation with Fixed Implant Restoration in Maxillary Edentulous Patient: Restoration Driven Concept. Implantology 2015. 대한구강악안면임프란트학회지 19권 4호, 2015 211.
(3) Case Report. ಽ⦹ᩡ݅ 'JH . JODMJOBUJPO⦹ᩍพ⦹ࠥಾ⦹ᩡŁᯥ⥭✙พŝ࠺. ၽ⊹⬥ᷪᯥ᮹⊹ෝEFMJFWFSZ⦽⬥⦹ᦦǍ⊹ᇡ CPOFEFGFDUᇡ᭥۵ᯕ᳦ʼnᯕᰍCJPPTT (FJTUMJDI. ᨱ⩲⊂ŝ⊹᳑ᱶᇡ᭥ᨱ(#3ᮥ࠺ᯝႊჶᮝಽᚁ ⦹ᩡ݅ 'JH . 1IBSNB"( 8PMIVTFO 4XJU[FSMBOE ᪡⯂ᙹᖒNFN. ᔢᦦᱥ⊹ᇡ᮹ᯥ⥭✙۵TVCNFSHFEUZQFᯙ"TUSB. CSBOFCJPHJEF (FJTUMJDI1IBSNB"( ෝᯕᬊ⦽ʼnᮁࠥ. %FOUTQMZ .öMOEBM 4XFEFO ⰜNN ᔢᦦŝ⦹ᦦ. ᰍᔾᚁ HVJEFECPOFSFHFOFSBUJPO (#3 ⬥ TUBHFE. Ǎ⊹ᇡ۵ OPO TVCNFSHFE UZQF 4USBVNBOO 5&. BQQSPBDIෝᱢᬊ⦹ᩍ}ᬵe᮹IFBMJOHTUBHFෝÑℱ. 4USBVNBOO #BTFM 4XJU[FSMBOE ಽพ⦹ᩡ݅ 'JH . ݉ĥಽᯥ⥭✙ෝพ⦹ʑಽ⦹ᩡŁ ᔢᦦ᮹Ğᬑ (#3ŝ࠺ᨱᯥ⥭✙ෝพ⦹ࠥಾ⦹ᩡ݅ 'JH ᔢᦦ᮹ʼn⯂ᙹಽᇡ░ᮁၽࡽᬑ⊂Ǎ⊹ᇡ⊹᳑ᱶ᮹ၹ. พ⬥QJDLVQJNQSFTTJPOᮥ☖⦹ᩍᵝ༉⩶ᱽ᯲⬥ KBXSFMBUJPOSFDPSEෝℕा⦹ᩍQSPWJTJPOBMSFTUPSBUJPO ᮥᰆ₊⦹ᩡ݅ 'JH . ݡƱ⧊ᮝಽᔢᦦᬑ⊂ᯥ⥭✙۵⩲⊂ᮝಽ᧞ࠥ Anterior cantilever Ovoid arch shape. 3 implant on premaxilla. A. B. Fig. 2. (A) Intermaxillary distance was estimated by. Fig. 3. Seven implant for maxillary edentulous and 3. diagnostic cast. (B) Diagnostic anterior wax up.. implant for premaxilla determined considering anteriorposterior spread.. Na Ree Yoon et al. : Oral Rehabilitation with Fixed Implant Restoration in Maxillary Edentulous Patient: Restoration Driven Concept. Implantology 2015. Na Ree Yoon et al. : Oral Rehabilitation with Fixed Implant Restoration in Maxillary Edentulous Patient: Restoration Driven Concept. Implantology 2015. Extraction on 7654321 76. 123456 567. 5 months. Mx, Mn immediate denture 3 months. Mx: Implant placement with GBR. Mn: GBR on left posterior area. 5 months. 4 months Mn implant placement. 2nd surgery. 3 months. 1 month Provisional prosthesis 2 months Final prosthesis. 212 Implantology Vol. 19 No. 4, 2015. Fig. 4. Treatment plan. Mx: maxilla, Mn: mandible, GBR: guided bone regeneration. Na Ree Yoon et al. : Oral Rehabilitation with Fixed Implant Restoration in Maxillary Edentulous Patient: Restoration Driven Concept. Implantology 2015.
(4) A. Fig. 5. Right posterior cross bite due to bone resorption. Na Ree Yoon et al. : Oral Rehabilitation with Fixed Implant Restoration in Maxillary Edentulous Patient: Restoration Driven Concept. Implantology 2015. A. C. B. C. Fig. 7. (A) Panorama after implant insertion. (B, C) Intraoral photography. Na Ree Yoon et al. : Oral Rehabilitation with Fixed Implant Restoration in Maxillary Edentulous Patient: Restoration Driven Concept. Implantology 2015. ⦹Łᯩᮭᮥᙹᯩᨩ݅ 'JH . B. *** 총괄 및 고찰. ྕ⊹ᦦ⪹ᯱ᮹ᙹᅖᮡᔢᝅࡽǍvĞⰒᩑ᳑Ḣ ⊹ᦥ ᮹ⅾℕᱢ⫭ᅖŝᦩ໕⩶┽᮹⫭ᅖᮥ⡍⧉⦽݅ᯕෝ᭥. Fig. 6. (A~C) Buccal alveolar bone loss and maxillay sinus pneumatization. Na Ree Yoon et al. : Oral Rehabilitation with Fixed Implant Restoration in Maxillary Edentulous Patient: Restoration Driven Concept. Implantology 2015. ⧕đᱶ⧁ᔍ⧎ᮡŁᱶᖒᮝಽ⧁äᯙḡa℁ᖒᮝಽᙹ ᅖ⧁äᯙḡ᪡พ⧁ᯥ⥭✙᮹}ᙹ ʼnᯕ᮹⦥ ᖒၰჵ᭥॒ᯕᯩ݅⊹ഭĥ⫮ᮥᖙᬑ۵ߑᯩᨕᕽ۵ ⪹ᯱ᮹Ǎ ᩑಚ ᮹⊹ᰆ₊Ğಆ ᱥᝁÕv Ğᱽᱢᩍ. ݍe᮹QSPWJTJPOBMSFTUPSBUJPOᰆ₊⬥ᯕෝᯕᬊ⦹ ᩍKBXSFMBUJPOSFDPSEෝ₥ा⦹Ł↽᳦JNQSFTTJPOᮥḥ ⧪⬥↽᳦ᅕ℁ྜྷᮥᰆ₊⦹ᩡ݅ 'JH -BUFSBMHVJEBODF۵ᔢᦦJ J J J ⦹ᦦ ᨱᕽᯕᨕḡࠥಾ⦹ᩡ݅ 'JOBMSFTUPSBUJPOᰆ₊⬥֥अGPMMPXVQQBOPSBNB ᔍḥᮥ☖⧕Łᱶᖒᯥ⥭✙ᅕ℁ྜྷᯕᖒŖᱢᮝಽʑ܆. ÕəญŁ⊹⧊ݡ᮹ᔢ┽ෝᝍᔍᙺŁ⦹ᩍᖁ┾⦽݅ ᪥ᱥྕ⊹ᦦᮡ᪥ᱥⅾ᮹⊹ ᯥ⥭✙ḡḡPWFSEFO UVSF ᯥ⥭✙ḡḡŁᱶᖒᅕ℁ྜྷ॒ᮝಽ⊹ഭ⧕ᵥᙹ ᯩ݅⊹ഭႊჶᮥđᱶ⧁ভᨱ۵⪹ᯱ᮹᯦ᰆᨱᕽ݅᧲ ⦽ႊ໕ᮝಽ⠪a⦹ᩍ⦹ŁəđŝᨱʑⅩ⦽ĥ⫮ᮥ ᖙᬭ⦽݅ ᔢᦦ᮹Ğᬑᔢᙽḡḡaᇡ᳒⦽Ğᬑӹ᳕ʼn᮹⯂ᙹ 대한구강악안면임프란트학회지 19권 4호, 2015 213.
(5) Case Report. A. B. C. Fig. 8. (A) Jaw relation record. (B, C) Provisional restoration. Na Ree Yoon et al. : Oral Rehabilitation with Fixed Implant Restoration in Maxillary Edentulous Patient: Restoration Driven Concept. Implantology 2015. A. C. B. D. E. Fig. 9. (A, B) Jaw relation record using provisional restoration. (C~E) Final prosthesis. Na Ree Yoon et al. : Oral Rehabilitation with Fixed Implant Restoration in Maxillary Edentulous Patient: Restoration Driven Concept. Implantology 2015. aŝࠥ⧁ĞᬑŁᱶᖒᮝಽᅕᔢ⦹۵äᮡๅᬑᨕಅᬑ ໑PWFSEFOUVSFಽᙹᅖ⦹۵äᯕʑ܆ᱢ ᝍၙᱢ ᭥ᔾᱢ ᮝಽ᧲⪙⦽đŝෝᮥᙹᯩ۵᷾ಡॅᯕฯ݅ ੱ⦽ᙹᅖྜྷᨱa⧕ḡ۵Ʊ⧊ಆᮡ⊹⧊ݡ᮹ᔢ┽ᨱᩢ ⨆ᮥၼ۵ߑ⊹⧊ݡaᯱᩑ⊹ÑӹŁᱶᖒᙹᅖྜྷᯙĞᬑ. ಆᮝಽᔢᦦ᮹ʼn⯂ᙹ᮹ḥ⧪ᮥaᗮ⪵┍ᙹᯩ݅ ᅙ᷾ಡ᮹Ğᬑᖙ᮹ᩍᯱ⪹ᯱᯕŁŁᱶᖒᅕ℁ྜྷ ಽḥ⧪⦹ʑෝᬱ⦹໑⦹ᦦᱥ⊹ᇡ᮹Łᱶᖒᅕ℁ྜྷಽ ᯙ⦹ᩍᔢᦦྕ⊹ᦦŝ⦹ᦦǍ⊹ᇡᯥ⥭✙ᅕ℁ಽᖁ ┾⦹ᩡ݅. ۵Ʊ⧊ಆᯕⓍí᯲ᬊ⧁ᙹᯩ݅ə్အಽ⦹ᦦᨱ݅ᙹ. ᅙ᷾ಡ᪡zᯕʼn⯂ᙹaⓕĞᬑᱢᱩ⦽ᇡ᭥ᨱᯥ⥭. ᮹ᯥ⥭✙ෝᯕᬊ⦽ŁᱶᖒCSJEHFಽᙹᅖ⦹۵Ğᬑᔢ. ✙᮹พᯕᨕಅᬕĞᬑaฯʑভྙᨱ⊹ഭ᯲ᱥ. ᦦᮥⅾ᮹⊹ಽ⊹ഭ⧁Ğᬑ⦹ᦦᨱᕽၽ⭹ࡹ۵ᖝƱ⧊. ᅕ℁ĥ⫮ᯕᖙᬭᲙ⦹໑݅᧲⦽ḥ݉ᇥᕾᮥ☖⧕. 214 Implantology Vol. 19 No. 4, 2015.
(6) ᯲⦽Ğᬑᅕ℁⊹ഭŅ⦽ĞᬑᨱḢ໕⧁ᙹᯩ ݅ḥ݉༉⩶᮹NPVOUJOHŝXBYVQᮡʼn⯂ᙹ᮹ᱶࠥ ᅕ℁ྜྷᮥ᭥⦽Ŗe ᦦešĥ ᙹḢŁĞॅᮥᇥᕾ⧁ᙹ ᯩ݅ྕ⊹ᦦ᮹ĞᬑᯙŖ⊹႑ᩕᯕᮁᬊ⦹݅ᯕ ŝᱶᨱ᮹⧕ᙹᅖྜྷ᮹ᝍၙᱢ ʑ܆ᱢđŝෝၙญᩩ⊂ ⧁ᙹᯩŁ ⨆⬥ᙹᅖྜྷ᮹Ʊ⧊šĥ᪡⊹ᦥ᮹ʙᯕ॒ᮥ ᙹᯩ݅. Fig. 10. Five-year follow-up panorama.. ᅙ᷾ಡᨱᕽ۵ḥ݉༉⩶ŝႊᔍᖁᱢᇥᕾŝ⪹ᯱ᮹ᖁ. Na Ree Yoon et al. : Oral Rehabilitation with Fixed Implant Restoration in Maxillary Edentulous Patient: Restoration Driven Concept. Implantology 2015. ⪙ࠥ ࡹ⧊ݡ۵⊹ᦥ᮹ᔢ┽॒ᮥŁಅ⦹ᩍᔢᦦྕ⊹ᦦ. ฿ᮡ⊹ഭ᧲ᮥᱢᬊ⧕⦽݅ᨕਁ⦽⊹ഭႊᮥđ. đᱶ⦹۵ŝᱶᨱᕽḥ݉༉⩶ᮥᯕᬊ⦹ᩍᱥ⨆ᱢᯙ⊹ഭ. ᱶ⧁äᯙa۵ᙹᅖ⦹Łᯱ⦹۵Ŗe᮹᧲ŝၡᱲ⦽š. ĥ⫮ᨱᇡ⧊⦹۵ᯥ⥭✙ᙹᅖĥ⫮ᮥᙹพ⦹ᩡᮝ໑ ᱢ. ಉᯕᯩ݅ᕽ᪥ᱥྕ⊹ᦦᨱᯥ⥭✙ෝพ⦹ᩍ. ⧊⦽ᙹ᮹ᯥ⥭✙᪡ʼnᯕ⦥ᩍᇡෝ⠪a⦹ᩍ⪹. ᙹᅖ⦹Łᯱ⦽݅໕ᗭᝅࡽ⊹ᦥၰᵝ᭥᳑Ḣ᮹᧲ᮥᨕ. ᯱ᮹ᝍၙᱢ ʑ܆ᱢ༊ᱢᨱᇡ⧊⦹۵ᅕ℁ྜྷᮥᱽ᯲⧁. ۱ᱶࠥၙญʼnᯕᮥ☖⦹ᩍ⫭ᅖ⧁äᯙḡᦥܩ໕ᅕ. ᙹᯩᨩ݅. ᮹⊹ഭĥ⫮ᮥŁᱶᖒᯥ⥭✙ಽᱶ⦹ᩡ݅⊹ഭႊჶᮥ. ℁ᙹᅖྜྷಽᗭᝅࡽᇡ᭥ෝݡℕ⧁äᯙḡෝᔍᱥᨱá ☁⧕⦽݅ ੱ⦽ᔢᦦྕ⊹ᦦ᮹ĞᬑŁᱶᖒᅕ℁ྜྷಽᙹᅖ⦹ʑ. *7 결론. ᭥⧕ᱶᔢᱢᯙᦦešĥ ⊹᳑ᱽ᮹ᔢ┽ ၙᗭᖁŝᩑ᳑ Ḣ⩶┽॒ᮥ༉ࢱŁಅ⧕⦹໑Łᱶᖒᅕ℁ྜྷᮥ⦹ʑ ᭥⧕ᕽ۵ᦦeŖeᯕ_NNᯕԕᩍ⦽݅ᦦeŖ. ʼnᯕ❭ƕࡹᨕ⊹ᦥaᔢᝅࡹᨩÑӹ⊹ᦥෝᔢᝅ⦽ḡ. ɚᯕNNᯕᔢᯝĞᬑ⊹ᦥaթྕʙᨕḡŁ⩲ḡḡ. ᪅௹ࡹᨕʼn᮹᧲ᯕᇡ᳒⦽Ğᬑᨱࠥ∊ᇥ⦽ʑeᮥࢱ. aᇡ᳒⧕ᲙᕽPWFSEFOUVSF᮹ᱢ᮲᷾ᯕࡽ݅ษ₍aḡ. Łᱢᱩ⦽ႊჶᮝಽʼnᯕᮥ⧪⦽݅໕ ᝍ⦽⊹ᵝḩ. ಽ⩲⊂⯂ᙹaฯᯕࡹᨕɪ᮹ᦦešĥࠥŁᱶᖒᅕ℁. ⪹⪹ᯱᨱíࠥʑ܆ᱢ ᝍၙᱢᮝಽᖒŖᱢᯙŁᱶᖒᯥ. ྜྷᅕ݅۵a℁ᖒᅕ℁ྜྷ᮹ᱢ᮲᷾ᯕࡽ݅. ⥭✙ᅕ℁ྜྷᮥᙹᅖ⧁ᙹᯩ݅. ੱ⦽aḡŁಅ⧁ᱱᮡᔢᦦᨱᯩᨕᕽŁᱶᖒ⪚ᮡa ℁ᖒ᮹đᱶᨱᯩᨕᕽᵲ⦽ᗭ۵ᩑ᳑Ḣḡḡ᪡ᝍ ၙᱢྙᱽ᮹⠪aᯕ݅ᔢᙽḡḡaᇡ᳒⦽ĞᬑŁᱶᖒ. References. ᮝಽ⧕đ⦹۵äᮡๅᬑᨕಖ݅ੱ⦽⮕ḡᔢ┽᪡ᬤᮥ ভ⊹ᦥaᅕᯕ۵ᱶࠥෝšₑ⧕⦽݅ ษḡสᮝಽᔢᦦ᪥ᱥྕ⊹ᦦᨱᕽᯥ⥭✙ෝพ⧁ อⓝ᮹ʼnᯕ᳕⦹ࠥᱶ⪶⦽ḥ݉ၰᅕ℁ᱢ⊹ഭ ĥ⫮ᨧᯕ᳕⦹۵ʼnᨱᯥ⥭✙ෝพ⦹ᩍ⊹ഭෝ. 1. Brånemark PI, Svensson B, van Steenberghe D. Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995; 6: 227-231. 2. Buser D, Ingimarsson S, Dula K, et al. Long-term stability of. 대한구강악안면임프란트학회지 19권 4호, 2015 215.
(7) Case Report. osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 5-year prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002; 22: 109-117. 3. Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977; 16: 1-132. 4. Stanford CM. Application of oral implants to the general dental practice. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005; 136: 1092-1100. 5. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17(Suppl 2): 136-159. 6. Hämmerle CH, Jung RE, Feloutzis A. A systematic review of the. 9. Taylor TD. Prosthodontic problems and limitations associated with osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 79: 74-78. 10. Bachhav VC, Aras MA. Zirconia-based fixed partial dentures: a clinical review. Quintessence Int. 2011; 42: 173-182. 11. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 64: 185-194. 12. Goodacre CJ, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81: 537-552. 13. Pauletto N, Lahiffe BJ, Walton JN. Complications associated with excess cement around crowns on osseointegrated implants: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999; 14: 865-868.. survival of implants in bone sites augmented with barrier membranes. 14. Aparicio C. A new method for achieving passive fit of an interim. (guided bone regeneration) in partially edentulous patients. J Clin. restoration supported by Brånemark implants: a technical note. Int J Oral. Periodontol. 2002; 29(Suppl 3): 226-231.. Maxillofac Implants. 1995; 10: 614-618.. 7. Schroeder A, van der Zypen E, Stich H, et al. The reactions of bone,. 15. Salvi GE, Zitzmann NU. The effects of anti-infective preventive. connective tissue, and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium-. measures on the occurrence of biologic implant complications and. sprayed surfaces. J Maxillofac Surg. 1981; 9: 15-25.. implant loss: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;. 8. Koo S, Dibart S, Weber HP. Ridge-splitting technique with simultaneous implant placement. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2008; 29: 106-110.. 216 Implantology Vol. 19 No. 4, 2015. 29(Suppl): 292-307..
(8)
관련 문서
“This program was supported by korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity(KOFAC)grant funded by the
Methods to overcome insufficient bone due to poor bone quality, the pneumatization of a maxillary sinus and other anatomical limitations of implant placement
Histopathologic findings of control group at 4 weeks show little bone- implant contact (BIC) around the implant (asterisks) and new-bone formation in the defect
So, this research was done for evaluating the usefulness of Periodontal age 「 index 」 by using 「 Periodontal age index 」 to examine subjective consciousness on
In other words, pomegranate extract has an effect of inhibiting the progression of alveolar bone loss due to periodontal inflammation by reducing the expression of COX-1 and
This study is an analysis of distribution of patient who installed Endopore Ⓡ at maxilla in Chosun University Dental hospital and types of implant for about 4
This showed that the surgical outcome was successfulin 269 patients (98.89%),butthe revision surgery due to surgicalrelapse was performed in three patients.Of 152 patients
period was prolonged unavoidably, (3) by explaining the risk factors associated with the failure to patients honestly, and subsequently performing