• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

The left graft may be the “right” graft: A comparative study of using the right versus left graft in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "The left graft may be the “right” graft: A comparative study of using the right versus left graft in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation"

Copied!
1
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

AHBPSAnnals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

www.ahbps.org S186

The left graft may be the “right” graft:

A comparative study of using the right versus left graft in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation

Hye-Sung JO, Young-Dong YU, Dong-Sik KIM*

Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

LV-PP-2-5

Introduction: Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been a dominant type of liver transplantation, especially in Asian countries where deceased donors are extremely scarce. Several centers have been attempted to use left liver graft because it could reduce the postoperative risk to the donor. This study retrospectively compared clinical outcomes between right and left liver grafts in adult-to-adult LDLT.

Methods: All consecutive 116 patients who underwent adult-to-adult LDLT between 2010 and 2020 were enrolled in this study. The study cohort comprised of 94 patients in the right liver (RL) group and 22 in the left liver (LL) group. When both hemiliver grafts meet the selection criteria, LL graft was preferred. Prospectively collected clinicopathologic characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and survival were evaluated.

Results: In terms of donor variables, median actual graft-to-recipient weight ratio was higher in the RL group than in the LL group (1.01 [0.66–1.66] vs. 0.85 [0.63–1.50], p = 0.030). Total bilirubin level and prothrombin time on postoperative day 5 were worse in the RL group, but it did not reach statistical significance. In terms of recipient variables, hepatic venous pressure gradient after reperfusion was comparable between the groups. The 90-day complication (above Clavien–Dindo grade IIIA) and 1-year graft survival rates were not different between the RL and LL groups (35.9% vs. 56.2%, p = 0.123; 91.3% vs. 93.8%, p = 0.744; respectively).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated comparable donor and recipient outcomes between the RL and LL groups. In an effort to min- imize potential donor risk, LL graft is worth considering when both grafts meet the selection criteria.

pISSN: 2508-5778ㆍeISSN: 2508-5859

Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2021;25 Suppl 1:S186 https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.LV-PP-2-5

Corresponding Author: Dong-Sik KIM ([email protected]) Presenter: Hye-Sung JO ([email protected])

Copyright Ⓒ The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

참조

관련 문서

KOTRY, Korean Organ Transplantation Registry; LDLT, living donor liver transplantation; LG, left lobe group; LT, liver trans- plantation; MHV, middle hepatic vein;

In liver transplantation (LT) for small infant patients, graft size matching to the recipient’s abdomen is critically important because implantation of a large-for-size graft

Kaplan-Meier patient survival curves of 219 patients underwent adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation according to their pretransplant T-lymphocytotoxic crossmatch

HIGHLIGHTS • An incision-and-patch venoplasty to enlarge the graft outflow vein orifice is beneficial for reducing the risk of hepatic vein outflow obstruction in living donor

We present two cases of pediatric living donor liver transplantation LDLT using laparoscopically harvested LL grafts and describe refined surgical techniques for graft hepatic

Korean J Transplant 2019;33 65 73 https //doi org/10 4285/jkstn 2019 33 4 65 Review Article Conceptual changes in small for size graft and small for size syndrome in living donor

Living-donor versus cadaveric liver transplantation for non- resectable small hepatocellular carcinoma and compensated.. Adult living donor liver transplantation for

Duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation utilizing right lobe graft.. Biliary ana- stomotic complications in 400 living related liver