• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

A Study on the Investigation into Dental Hygienists` Awareness of Health Impairment Factors by Occupational Diseases

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "A Study on the Investigation into Dental Hygienists` Awareness of Health Impairment Factors by Occupational Diseases"

Copied!
8
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

Journal of Dental Hygiene Science Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 59~ 66 (2003)



     



 

1 , 2 

A Study on the Investigation into Dental Hygienists' Awareness of Health Impairment Factors by Occupational Diseases

Mi-Sook Yoon, Gui-Sook Song1 and Mi-Hee Ko2

Department of Dental Hygiene, Dong-u College, Sokcho City, Kangwon-Do 217-711, Korea

1Department of Dental Hygiene, Wonkwang Health Science College, Iksan-City 570-750, Korea

2Department of Dental Hygiene, Daejeon Health Science College, Daejeon-City 300-711, Korea

 As a basic research material to make more efficient healthcare and health promotion for dental hygienists, this study intends to determine which factors may affect their awareness of occupational diseases. For this sake, this study attempted to investigate into a variety of literatures and data, and applied a questionnaire survey to 160 dental hygienists for about 5 months(from June to October 2003), who were all employed in domestic dental clinics or offices. As a result of analysis, this study can be concluded as follows: (1) The result of analyzing how dental hygienists recognized their occupational diseases showed that ‘stiffness in muscle, neck or shoulder due to intensive use of specific physical regions’

and ‘stress resulting from the attributes of each task’ reached the highest awareness(90.6%) of all, which was followed by

‘lower eyesight due to detailed or even sophisticated tasks for many hours(65%)’ and ‘symptoms of ruptured disk due to standing tasks as dental hygienists do for many hours(62.5%).’ (2) The result of analyzing how dental hygienists recognize their occupational diseases showed that their awareness averaged 7.28 points out of 14 points, which implies that their awareness of occupational diseases is not very high. Meanwhile, the result of examining how they recognize detrimental or harmful properties of given materials against human body showed that a majority of total respondents(74.4%) regarded given materials as detrimental to human body. (3) The result of examining how dental hygienists recognize their occupational diseases showed that a majority of total respondents(91.9%) identified their own occupational diseases. Many of total respondents(41.9%) pointed out that environmental improvement around workshop in each clinic or office should be foremost prerequisite to health and welfare for dental hygienists. Next, 34.4% of total respondents pointed out the necessity to perform in-house health diagnosis and examination on a regular basis, and 13.1% of total respondents thought it necessary to carry on healthcare education into harmful properties in the aspect of dental materiology, respectively.

  Occupational diseases, Health impairment

 

1776 Percivall Pott   

       ! "#

$ % &' () *  +, -. /0 12 345, 6789: ;< = > ?<@: "# A B CD, 1E A4F. @G HIJ KL  M,N 89 < "#$ O P9Q RS +, /0: T U V W X@5 AF1).

I#)Y "#$ Z [\3: ! ]^_(, _`7

<Q a: *_^7 <Q  *@: ()V b,F2-4). cP: I#) deV ?+@K "#fRg "#Qh

, (), ijkig 9 , ()V lm@:n .

I#op ($89 qr@sJ ,F. t`gu t, cP 20 v wx7< [yz {|B "#fR AB -.

d} ~Bs: @G €#g I#) ‚ƒ „.

KL !.‚ƒ …< HIJ - †H A: ‡F.

I#). €#z: ˆu ‰' Š ‹ Œ5 Gp7 89 Ž Ž * ‘]> ’“@ 3”9 •<J Q

 –C89 —˜ ™ š: › +65 œ sv 

 ž G Ÿ ™ A: › wx7  ¡, ¢> £¤

 Œ8¥ Ÿ ™ š5, a 3 Œ. › - AF5).

Corresponding author Tel: 033-639-0673 Fax: 033-639-0518 E-mail: [email protected]

(2)

 A Study on the Investigation into Dental Hygienists' Awareness of Health Impairment Factors by Occupational Diseases

¤‚*¢ ¦9 g§¨ ™ A: I#)u5 @¥ t } œ ©v yª w, Qh> !ž m89« s<@

: ¬`­i®, ¯­i®, B°=± ² P³´ µ– ™ . ² ¤¶9 <, ‚z ·¸ +, ‚ƒV  ™ AF. ijki ™ a, § I#¹WF „8 , L, ij ki: P³´ µ– +, º»V ¼¤: ›89 g§

½F6).

¤‚*¢ ¦9 P¾@: );u: $. ·¸p ($

V lm, KL ¿.Gp ($ 1À.¤¶3: Á 9,  L, #¾> ™2m AB I#7< RS !…< ÂL ÃK AF7). %Lg, ÄÅ ¤‚*¢ I#) W5

Æ: š5, : ÇÈ789 RS` ~B5 A Œs ÉÊu5 *Ë3 , L, ©N I#)89 $3s

U, I#C g§¨ ™ A: () +@K ÆÌ@5 gH

 RS–1V JÍ@s ‚, s’Q¶ ΅pV 1F8).

 • /0: ¤‚*¢ ÏÐ7< RS`z RS–1 V ‚, s’Q¶9 ¤‚*¢ I#) <Ñ ™Ò º»

V ¼¤: …<V ÓÔ@5Q • /0> ©J@ÕF.

 

1. 

• /0 /0+CQ wx7 Öp. q 1 ×F.

/ØÙ9: 25h @ 53.1%9 Á -Ú8 , F89 26~30h, 31~35h, 36~40h, 40h C Û89 g§½F. = ÜCÝÙ9: ¼Ü 79.4%9, sÜ 20.6% WF -ÚF. P

¾ÞÝÙ9: ¤); 38.8%9 Á -Ú8 , F89

¤; 34.4%, ¤+^); 16.3% Û89 g§½F. P¾

 Ù9: ß 57.5%9 Á -Ú8 , S;J 13.8%, UuJ 10.0%, sJ 8.8%, s§ 5.6%, à J 4.4% Û8 9 g§½F. P¾áÙ9: 1~3 ¼G 36.3%9 Á - Ú8 , F89 1 ¼G 25.6%, 4~6 20.6%, 10 C 10.6%, 7~9 6.9% Û89 @ÕF. /v™âÙ9: 1500 G; ¼G 41.9%9 Á -Ú8 , F89 1500~2000G

; ¼G 33.1%, 2000~2500G; ¼G 11.3%, 2500~3000G

; ¼G 8.1%, 3000G; C 5.6% Û4F. P¾©vÙ9 : 8©v 45.0%9 Á -Ú8 , F89 9©v 30.0%, 10©v 18.1%, 11©v C 6.9% Û89 g§½F.

2.  

• /0 I#) ãJ0 äåJ> –, =: q 2 z × Cronbach α 0.749 g§æ ›V ç É , I#) ãJ0: äåè G, ™ÒéV Ÿ ™ AF.

3. 

• /0 ™ê Q¶: SPSS(Statistical Package for the Social Science) ë9%ìV í@K 6î@ÕF. 6îsï8 9: /0+CQ wx7 ÖpV ÓÔ@s ‚ ðJz ñ6 ÐV €\@ÕF. a, ¤‚*¢ I#) <Ñ ™ÒV ò óWs ‚ t-test(–)z ANOVA(‘ô6î), x2(Chi-square)

–, %`5 ðJ6îV ‡©@ÕF.

1.  

1) I#) <љÒ

¤‚*¢ I#) ™ÒV òó• =: q 3 ×F.

õ9 <, ©á ö@’ +: %÷F5 <Ñ@: ¤

‚*¢ 60.0%9, %÷ ŒF5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢ W F -ÚF. ‘Á©v h¡, #¾9 <, ©á ö@’ +

: %÷F5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢ 65.0%9, %÷ ŒF5

<Ñ@: ¤‚*¢ WF -ÚF. ‘#¾C *@: 89

<, á ö@’ +: %÷ ŒF5 <Ñ@: ¤‚

*¢ 56.3%9, %÷F5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢ WF -ÚF.

#¾9 <, øµ–g ù : t’ +: %÷

 ŒF5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢ 75.0%9 +6V @Õ 8 , %÷F5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢: 25.0%9 g§½F. ‘õ

z µú |ô ²89 <, “ sû *’ +:

%÷ ŒF5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢ 54.4%9, %÷F5 <

Ñ@: ¤‚*¢ WF -ÚF. ‘#¾9 <, Uä ¬üg

  

  () (%)



25 26~30 31~35 36~40 40

85 51 13 7 4

53.1 31.9 8.1 4.4 2.5

  

 127

33

79.4 20.6







()

!

26 62 55 6 11

16.3 38.8 34.4 3.8 6.9

"

#$%

&

'()*

!

92 14 22 7 16 9

57.5 8.8 13.8 4.4 10.0 5.6

%+

1, - 1~3, - 4~6,7~9, 10,

41 58 33 11 17

25.6 36.3 20.6 6.9 10.6

./0

1500- - 1500~2000- - 2000~2500- - 2500~3000- - 3000-

67 53 18 13 9

41.9 33.1 11.3 8.1 5.6

1.

81.

91.

101.

111.

72 48 29 11

45.0 30.0 18.1 6.9

160 100.0

    

  23 / Alpha

45 14 0.74

(3)

Journal of Dental Hygiene Science Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 59~66 (2003) 

ýü –h *’ +: %÷ ŒF5 <Ñ@: ¤‚

*¢ 55.0%9 g§½F.

I#ÖpC Á©v @: #¾9 <, ­i® –h’

+: %÷F5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢ 62.5%9, %÷

ŒF5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢ 37.5%WF -ÚF. ‘Ö ‚

¢í89 <, Pþ, ¯, B° =±’ +: %÷F5 <

Ñ@: ¤‚*¢ 90.6%9 +6V @Õ8 , ‘ÿg ÿ o–C’ +: %÷F5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢

51.9%9, %÷ ŒF5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢ 48.1%WF -Ú F. ‘#¾ Öp89 <, ]s ö@’ +: %÷

ŒF5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢ 56.3%9, %÷F5 <Ñ@:

¤‚*¢ WF -ÚF.

µ BL –C’ +: %÷F5 <Ñ@: ¤

‚*¢ 56.9%9, %÷ ŒF5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢

43.1%WF -ÚF. ‘·s –C . *’ +: %÷

 ŒF5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢ 70.0%9 +6V @Õ 8 , ‘¢í@5 A: ¶9 <, ¸–, Ÿks –C’

+: %÷ ŒF5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢ 82.5%9 +

6V @ÕF. ‘#¾ Öp89 <, ijki’ +:

%÷F5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢ 90.6%9 +6V @Õ 8 , %÷ ŒF5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢: 9.4%9  7 74F.

2) wx7 Öp &' I#) <Ñ

¤‚*¢ wx7 Öp &u I#) +, Ë ™ ÒV òó• =: q 4z × U 14N GN Z  7.289, ¤‚*¢. I#) +, Ë ™Ò %F „

 ŒÚF.

/ØÙ9: /Ø -V™ I#) +, Ë ™Ò „ Ú8g !¼, : H 4F. =ÜCÝÙ9: sÜ ¼ ÜWF I#) +, Ë ™Ò „Ú8g =ÜCÝ &'

!¼, : š4F. P¾ÞÝÙ9: ¤); P¾@:

¤‚*¢ F' ¤‚*¢WF I#) +, Ë ™Ò

Ú8g µ789: !¼, > W ŒÚF.

P¾ Ù9: ß  P¾@: ¤‚*¢z ß 

  P¾@: ¤‚*¢ ÙF' > W ŒÚF.

P¾áÙ9: P¾á -V™ I#) +, Ë ™Ò

 „Ú8g !¼, : H 4F. /v™âÙ9: /v

™â -V™ I#) +, Ë ™Ò „Ú8g µ7 89: !¼, > W ŒÚF. P¾©vÙ9: P¾

©v -V™ I#) +, Ë ™Ò „Ú8g P¾©

v &' !¼, : š4F.

C × ¤‚*¢. I#) +, Ë ™Ò % F „ ŒÚ8 , /Ø =ÜCÝ, P¾ÞÝz  , á, /v™â, %`5 P¾©vÙ9: > W ŒÚF.

 3.     : (%)

2 3 678 67

98 :

;< 1+ => ? @ A BC8D EF GHI? 96 (60.0)

64 (40.0)

160 (100.0)

;< 1+ J1. KL 5> ? @ A BC8D EF GHI? 104 (65.0)

56 (35.0)

160 (100.0)

;< (+ 5 ME N OP> A BCQHI? 70 (43.8)

90 (56.3)

160 (100.0)

;< RS T U 5> ?V WXYZ [ \ ]N %^W _QHI? 40 (25.0)

120 (75.0)

160 (100.0)

;< RST U`# =, Yabc dP> ? @ We, f d _QHI? 73 (45.6)

87 (54.4)

160 (100.0)

;<g 5> ? @ )<hi [ ji ZW _QHI? 72 (45.0)

88 (55.0)

160 (100.0)

;<g 45kl J1. ## N 5> ? @ mno ZW _QHI? 100 (62.5)

60 (37.5)

160 (100.0)

;<g kpqrs ;t uvwP> ?L x, y, z{| _QHI? 145 (90.6)

15 (9.4)

160 (100.0)

;< } [ }W~` 5> ?L %Z _QHI? 83 (51.9)

77 (48.1)

160 (100.0)

;< €T 5klP> ? @ A BC8D EF GHI? 70 (43.8)

90 (56.3)

160 (100.0)

;<g  U ‚ƒ dP> ?L „Y, z…† Z _QHI? 91 (56.9)

69 (43.1)

160 (100.0)

;<g 45klP> ? @ ME N ‡Z ;t _QHI? 48 (30.0)

112 (70.0)

160 (100.0)

;< uv D _N ˆ‰> ?L ŠqƒZ, ‹Œ Z _QHI? 28 (17.5)

132 (82.5)

160 (100.0)

;<g 5 kl nŽŒns N ? _8D EF GHI? 145 (90.6)

15 (9.4)

160 (100.0)

(4)

 A Study on the Investigation into Dental Hygienists' Awareness of Health Impairment Factors by Occupational Diseases

3) I#o RS þ ƒ &' ¤‚*¢ I#)

+, <Ñ

I#o RS þ ƒ &u ¤‚*¢ I#) +,

<ÑV òó• =: q 5z ×F.

q 5 W: z × I#o RS þ ƒ A:

¤‚*¢ I#) +, <ÑJ 96.3%9 I#o RS þ ƒ š: ¤‚*¢ <ÑJ 91.0% WF „Ú8g µ789: !¼, > W ŒÚF.

4) IÁ RS1 ƒ &' ¤‚*¢ I#) +,

IÁ RS1 ƒ &u ¤‚*¢ I#) +, <

ÑV òó• =: q 6 × IÁ RS1V . 7

A: ¤‚*¢z %÷ Œ. ¤‚*¢ ÙF'  š

 +6 ¤‚*¢ I#) AV ›u5 <Ñ@

ÕF.

2.     

¢í@: ¶ < !p + ¤‚*¢ <ÑV òó• =: q 7 × ¢í@: ¶ < !@F

   !  

  N Mean SD t p



25 85 7.04 2.96

0.62 0.538

26~30 51 7.49 2.87

31 24 7.71 3.80

   127 7.27 2.99

-0.11 0.913

 33 7.33 3.37



 62 7.03 2.94

2.11 0.125

 55 6.93 3.10

! 43 8.09 3.11

" #$ 92 7.29 3.08

0.06 0.953

#$ ‘ 68 7.26 3.07

%+

1, - 41 6.98 3.24

0.95 0.389

1~3, 58 7.05 2.92

4, 61 7.70 3.08

./0

1500- - 67 6.85 3.12

2.46 0.089 1500~2000-

- 53 7.15 2.68

2000- 40 8.18 3.32

1.

81. 72 6.92 3.26

1.91 0.152

91. 48 7.17 3.16

101. 40 8.08 2.43

) ’ 160 7.28 3.06

  "# $%&' () !  

* 

  45` L ?“ x2

(df) p

”8 •–8 _8 :

&—˜4J

%™š

_8 1 (3.7)

26 (96.3)

27 (16.9) 0.95

(2) 0.622

”8 2 (1.5)

10 (7.5)

121 (91.0)

133 (83.1)

: 2

(1.3) 11 (6.9)

147 (91.9)

160 (100.0)

  + $%,- () !   * 

  45` L ?“ x2

(df) p

”8 •–8 _8 :

&—˜4J

%™š

_8 1 (1.4)

5 (7.1)

64 (91.4)

70 (43.8) 0.47

(2) 0.977

”8 1 (1.2)

6 (7.3)

83 (92.2)

90 (56.3)

: 2

(1.3) 11 (6.9)

147 (91.9)

160 (100.0)

  . /0 1 23

  š›

8 š› 

98 : x2 (df) p



25 62 (72.9)

23 (27.1)

85 (53.1)

0.21 (2) 0.898

26~30 39

(76.5) 12 (23.5)

51 (31.9) 31

18

(75.0) 6 (25.0)

24 (15.0)

 

 93

(73.2) 34 (26.8)

127 (79.4) 0.43

(1) 0.515

 26

(78.8) 7 (21.2)

33 (20.6)



 46 (74.2)

16 (25.8)

62 (38.8)

0.85 (2) 0.655

 39 (70.9)

16 (29.1)

55 (34.4)

! 34

(79.1) 9 (20.9)

43 (26.9)

"

#$ 70

(76.1) 22 (23.9)

92 (57.5) 0.33

(1) 0.564

#$ ‘ 49 (72.1)

19 (27.9)

68 (42.5)

%+

1, - 32

(78.0) 9 (22.0)

41 (25.6)

0.74 (2) 0.691

1~3, 41

(70.7) 17 (29.3)

58 (36.3)

4, 46

(75.4) 15 (24.6)

61 (38.1)

./0

1500-

- 47

(70.1) 20 (29.9)

67 (41.9)

1.33 (2) 0.515 1500~2000

- - 40 (75.5)

13 (24.5)

53 (33.1) 2000-

32

(80.0) 8 (20.0)

40 (25.0)

1.

81. 55

(76.4) 17 (23.6)

72 (45.0)

1.33 (2) 0.514

91. 37

(77.1) 11 (22.9)

48 (30.0) 101.

27

(67.5) 13 (32.5)

40 (25.0)

: 119

(74.4) 41 (25.6)

160 (100.0)

(5)

Journal of Dental Hygiene Science Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 59~66 (2003) 

5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢ 74.4%9 +6V @Õ8 ,

%÷ ŒF5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢: 25.6%9 g§½F.

/ØÙ9: 26h C 25h @WF ¢í@: ¶ <

 !@F5 <Ñ@Õ8g µ789: !¼, >

W ŒÚF. =ÜCÝÙ9: sÜ ¼ÜWF ¢í@: 

¶ < !@F5 <Ñ@Õ8g !¼, : H 4 F. P¾ÞÝÙ9: ¤; P¾@: ¤‚*¢ F'

¤‚*¢WF ¢í@: ¶ < !@ ŒF5 <Ñ

@Õ8g P¾ÞÝ &' !¼, : š4F.

P¾ Ù9: ß  ¤‚*¢ %÷ Œ. ¤‚

*¢WF ¢í@: ¶ < !@F5 <Ñ@Õ8g µ

789: !¼, > W ŒÚF. P¾áÙ9: 1

¼G< ¤‚*¢ 1 C< ¤‚*¢WF ¢í@: ¶

 < !@F5 <Ñ@Õ8g !¼, : H 4F.

/v™âÙ9: /v™â -V™ ¢í@: ¶ <

 !@F5 <Ñ@Õ8g /v™â &' !¼, :

š4F. P¾©vÙ9: 9©v @ P¾@: ¤‚*¢ 10

©v C P¾@: ¤‚*¢WF ¢í@: ¶ <

!@F5 <Ñ@Õ8g µ789: !¼, > W

ŒÚF.

C × +6 ¤‚*¢ ¢í@: ¶ <

!@F5 <Ñ@Õ8 , /Ø =ÜCÝ, P¾ÞÝz  ,  á, /v™â, %`5 P¾©vÙ9: > W ŒÚF.

3.    

¤‚*¢ I#) + ¤‚*¢ <ÑV òó •

=: q 8 × ¤‚*¢ I#) AF5 <Ñ@

: ¤‚*¢ 91.9%9 +6V @Õ8 , %÷ Œ

    * 

  ”8 •–8 _8 : x2 (df) p



25 - 7

(8.2)

78 (91.8)

85 (53.1)

4.89

(4) 0.299

26~30 2

(3.9)

3 (5.9)

46 (90.2)

51 (31.9)

31 - 1

(4.2)

23 (95.8)

24 (15.0)

 

 2

(1.6)

9 (7.1)

116 (91.3)

127

(79.4) 0.58

(2) 0.749

 - 2

(6.1)

31 (93.9)

33 (20.6)



 1

(1.6)

5 (8.1)

56 (90.3)

62 (38.8)

1.06

(4) 0.900

 1

(1.8)

3 (5.5)

51 (92.7)

55 (34.4)

! - 3

(7.0)

40 (93.0)

43 (26.9)

"

#$ 1

(1.1)

8 (8.7)

83 (90.2)

92

(57.5) 1.15

(2) 0.561

#$ ‘ 1

(1.5)

3 (4.4)

64 (94.1)

68 (42.5)

%+

1, - - 2

(4.9)

39 (95.1)

41 (25.6)

3.82

(4) 0.431

1~3, - 5

(8.6)

53 (91.4)

58 (36.3)

4, 2

(3.3)

4 (6.6)

55 (90.2)

61 (38.1)

./0

1500- - 1

(1.5)

6 (9.0)

60 (89.6)

67 (41.9)

1.97

(4) 0.742

1500~2000-

- 1

(1.9)

2 (3.8)

50 (94.3)

53 (33.1)

2000- - 3

(7.5)

37 (92.5)

40 (25.0)

1.

81. 1

(1.4)

6 (8.3)

65 (90.3)

72 (45.0)

5.03

(4) 0.284

91. 1

(2.1)

5 (10.4)

42 (87.5)

48 (30.0)

101. - - 40

(100.0)

40 (25.0)

: 2

(1.3)

11 (6.9)

147 (91.9)

160 (100.0)

(6)

 A Study on the Investigation into Dental Hygienists' Awareness of Health Impairment Factors by Occupational Diseases F5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢: 1.3%9 t 74F.

/ØÙ9: 31h C 30h @WF ¤‚*¢ I

#) AV ›u5 <Ñ@Õ8g µ789: !¼, 

> W ŒÚF. =ÜCÝÙ9: sÜ ¼ÜWF ¤‚

*¢ I#) AV ›u5 <Ñ@Õ8g !¼, 

: H 4F. P¾ÞÝÙ9: ÙF'  𠤂*¢

 I#) AV ›u5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢ +6V

@ÕF.

P¾ Ù9: ß   ¤‚*¢ ß ¤‚

*¢WF ¤‚*¢ I#) AV ›u5 <Ñ@Õ8g P¾  &' !¼, : š4F. P¾áÙ9: 1

¼G P¾, ¤‚*¢ 1 C P¾, ¤‚*¢WF

¤‚*¢ I#) AV ›u5 <Ñ@Õ8g µ78 9: !¼, > W ŒÚF.

/v™âÙ9: 1500~2000G; ¼G< ¤‚*¢ F'

¤‚*¢WF ¤‚*¢ I#) AV ›u5 <Ñ@

Õ8g !¼, : H 4F. P¾©vÙ9: 10©v  C P¾@: ¤‚*¢ 9©v @ P¾@: ¤‚*¢W F ¤‚*¢ I#) AV ›u5 <Ñ@Õ8g P¾

©v &' !¼, : š4F.

C × +6 ¤‚*¢ ¤‚*¢ I#

) AV ›u5 <Ñ@Õ8 , /Ø =ÜCÝ, P¾ÞÝ z  , á, /v™â, %`5 P¾©vÙ9: > W

 ŒÚF.

4.  !"#$%  &'()* + ,

¤‚*¢ RS> ‚ t}3Bž è ¢ +

¤‚*¢ <ÑV òó • =: q 9z × ¤‚*

   $%456 3 789:; < =

  œ ]

&˜Ÿ  1pž

4J ]

&˜Ÿ  1pž

ˆ‰ž

š›l` L

¡x 1

F 4J¢

¤%¥¦£5J

 rEu

‰§ p)v : x2

(df) p



25 7

(8.2)

32 (37.6)

8 (9.4)

35 (41.2)

3 (3.5)

85 (53.1)

4.26

(8) 0.833

26~30 4

(7.8)

17 (33.3)

8 (15.7)

21 (41.2)

1 (2.0)

51 (31.9)

31 2

(8.3)

6 (25.0)

5 (20.8)

11

(45.8) - 24

(15.0)

 

 10

(7.9)

47 (37.0)

13 (10.2)

53 (41.7)

4 (3.1)

127

(79.4) 6.25

(4) 0.181

 3

(9.1)

8 (24.2)

8 (24.2)

14

(42.4) - 33(20.6)



 7

(11.3)

24 (38.7)

7 (11.3)

24

(38.7) - 62

(38.8)

16.47*

(8) 0.036

 2

(3.6)

22 (40.0)

5 (9.1)

22 (40.0)

4 (7.3)

55 (34.4)

! 4

(9.3)

9 (20.9)

9 (20.9)

21

(48.8) - 43

(26.9)

"

#$ 8

(8.7)

30 (32.6)

13 (14.1)

40 (43.5)

1 (1.1)

92

(57.5) 2.31

(4) 0.679

#$ ‘ 5

(7.4)

25 (36.8)

8 (11.8)

27 (39.7)

3 (4.4)

68 (42.5)

%+

1, - 4

(9.8)

14 (34.1)

3 (7.3)

19 (46.3)

1 (2.4)

41 (25.6)

6.02

(8) 0.644

1~3, 4

(6.9)

21 (36.2)

7 (12.1)

23 (39.7)

3 (5.2)

58 (36.3)

4, 5

(8.2)

20 (32.8)

11 (18.0)

25

(41.0) - 61

(38.1)

. /0

1500-

- 3

(4.5)

25 (37.3)

8 (11.9)

27 (40.3)

4 (6.0)

67 (41.9)

10.88 (8) 0.208 1500~2000

- - 7

(13.2)

18 (34.0)

5 (9.4)

23

(43.4) - 53

(33.1) 2000-

3

(7.5)

12 (30.0)

8 (20.0)

17

(42.5) - 40

(25.0)

1.

81. 9

(12.5)

22 (30.6)

11 (15.3)

28 (38.9)

2 (2.8)

72 (45.0)

5.39

(8) 0.716

91. 1

(2.1)

18 (37.5)

6 (12.5)

22 (45.8)

1 (2.1)

48 (30.0)

101. 3

(7.5)

15 (37.5)

4 (10.0)

17 (42.5)

1 (2.5)

40 (25.0)

: 13

(8.1)

55 (34.4)

21 (13.1)

67 (41.9)

4 (2.5)

160 (100.0)

*p<.05

(7)

Journal of Dental Hygiene Science Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 59~66 (2003) 

¢ RS> ‚ Ë IÁÙ "#Á $d} t}78 9 ~Bž ,F5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢ 41.9%9 Á -Ú8 , F89 IÁ ; s7 RS1À ‡©

34.4%, ¶^7 !p +, WR þ ‡© 13.1%, 

; s7 RS1À ‡© 8.1%, ¤ ‚*¢ Uí ¶s

  2.5% Û89 g§½F.

/ØÙ9: /Ø 7V™ ¤‚*¢ RS> ‚

IÁ ; s7 RS1À ‡© t}789 ~Bž

,F5 <Ñ@Õ5, /Ø -V™ ¶^7 !p +, WR þ ‡©ž ,F5 <Ñ@Õ8g !¼, : H 4F. =ÜCÝÙ9: ¼Ü sÜWF ¤‚*¢ RS

> ‚ IÁ ; s7 RS1À ‡© t}789 

~Bž ,F5 <Ñ@Õ5, ¼Ü sÜWF ¶^7 !

p +, WR þ ‡©ž ,F5 <Ñ@Õ8g =ÜCÝ

&' !¼, : š4F.

P¾ÞÝÙ9: ¤); ¤; P¾@: ¤‚*¢

 F' ¤‚*¢WF ¤‚*¢ RS> ‚ IÁ

; s7 RS1À ‡© t}789 ~Bž ,F5

<Ñ@Õ5, ¤); ¤; H F' s P¾@

: ¤‚*¢ ¤); ¤; P¾@: ¤‚*¢W F Ë IÁÙ "#Á $d} t}789 ~Bž ,F 5 <Ñ@Õ8 , P¾ÞÝ &u !¼, > WÕF (p<.05). P¾ Ù9: ß   ¤‚*¢ ß

¤‚*¢WF ¤‚*¢ RS> ‚ Ë IÁÙ "#

Á $d} t}789 ~Bž ,F5 <Ñ@Õ8g µ

789: !¼, > W ŒÚF.

/v™âÙ9: /v™â 7V™ ¤‚*¢ RS

> ‚ IÁ ; s7 RS1À ‡© t}789 

~Bž ,F5 <Ñ@Õ8g /v™â &' !¼, 

: š4F. P¾©vÙ9: 9©v C P¾@: ¤‚*¢

8©v P¾@: ¤‚*¢WF ¤‚*¢ RS> ‚

IÁ ; s7 RS1À ‡© t}789 ~Bž

,F5 <Ñ@Õ5, /Ø 7V™ ¶^7 !p +, WR þ ‡©ž ,F5 <Ñ@Õ8g !¼, : H 4F.

C × ¤‚*¢. ¤‚*¢ RS> ‚

Ë IÁÙ "#Á $d} Á t}789 ~Bž , F5 <Ñ@Õ8 , ¤); ¤; P¾@: ¤‚*

¢ F' ¤‚*¢WF ¤‚*¢ RS> ‚ IÁ

; s7 RS1À ‡© t}789 ~Bž ,F5

<Ñ@ÕF.



¤‚*¢ ¦ P¾< );. ֙, $ ÉÊ ¶

í Pp „5, () ÆÌ O ` „V ›89 s+@G, %L, s+z: ˆ` ¶€#. $ ֙p

 o ()* F' €#WF „F: = 

 W535 AF9).

r2 t`gu €#ªUWRï: Mf# );V lm

@K P9Q WR`> ‚, ï7 Á¤ o3B A8g

¦9 Mf#V +C89G ` ~B8 , );P9Q

 +, WR`: ©3BF. L, ); P9Q RS V W@s ‚, WR` ¢89: Ë IÁÙ "#Á $

d} t}789 ~Bž ,F5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢

41.9%9 Á -Ú8 , F89 IÁ ; s7 RS1 À ‡© 34.4% Û89 g§g 10) RS1 78.0%z 

 A48 , 5) =z: ×ÚF.

¤‚*¢ I#) <љÒV òó• = <љÒ

Á „ g§æ í. Pþ, ¯, B°=± ² µ– z ijki ËË 90.6%9 g§½8 , Á©v h¡, #¾9

<, ©á ö@ 65%, Á©v @: #¾9 <, ­i®

–h 62.5% Û89 g§½F.  =: 5) ijki 82.5%z ©áö@ 71.9%z !¢@ g§½F.

I#) –C <љÒ Á º»V ¼¤: …<. P¾©

v89 P¾©v ™ I#) –C …< –@5 % SJ „. ›89 g§g 7) 11) /0=z ×ÚF.

¤‚*¢ I#) +, <ÑV òó• =: I#)

AF5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢ 91.9%9 +6V @Õ8  , %÷ ŒF5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢: 1.3%9 t 74F.

¢í@: ¶ < !p + ¤‚*¢ <ÑV òó• = < !@F5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢ 74.4%

9 +6V @Õ:n, : ;12) = 63.1%WF -.

›89 f¢34F.

C =9 ¼~B ç É, ¤‚*¢ I#)V ÆÌ@

s ‚: !, Ë IÁ; "#$ d}3Bž @ 5 s7 RS1ÀV ‡©ž @5, Â!, W™ þg ^   ¶ !p +@K WR þV "78 9 ‡©ž è › , #!, ¤‚*¢ ii9 RS–1V

‚@K y7< RS` $«ž è ›F.

 

¤‚*¢ ÏÐ7< RS`z RS–1V ‚, s’Q

¶9 ¤‚*¢ I#) <Ñ ™Ò º»V ¼¤: …<

V ÓÔ@5Q Ê% Q¶> f¢@5, U ¤), ;

&¢@: 0p; 160'V +C89 2003 6() 10(Å

ü 5d( yª *Êf¢> ‡©@K 6î, = F ×.

=+V ,4F.

1. ¤‚*¢ I#) <љÒV òó • = ‘Ö

‚ ¢í89 <, Pþ, ¯, B° =±’ ‘#¾ Öp C <, ijki’ 90.6%9 <љÒ Á „ g

§½8 , % F89 ‘Á©v h¡, #¾9 <, ©á ö@’ 65%, ‘I#ÖpC Á©v @: #¾9 <

, ­i® –h’ 62.5% Û89 g§½F.

2. ¤‚*¢ I#) +, Ë ™ÒV òó• =

U 14N GN Z  7.289, I#) +, Ë

™Ò %F „ ŒÚ8 , ¢í@: ¶ < !

p +, <ÑV òó• = ¢í@: ¶ <

!@F5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢ 74.4%9 +6V 

@ÕF.

3. ¤‚*¢ I#) +, <ÑV òó• = I#)

 AF5 <Ñ@: ¤‚*¢ 91.9%9 +6V 

@Õ8 , ¤‚*¢ RS> ‚ Ë IÁÙ "

(8)

 A Study on the Investigation into Dental Hygienists' Awareness of Health Impairment Factors by Occupational Diseases

#Á $d} t}789 ~Bž ,F5 <Ñ@:

¤‚*¢ 41.9%9 Á -Ú8 , F89 IÁ 

; s7 RS1À ‡© 34.4%, ¶^7 !p

+, WR þ ‡© 13.1% Û89 g§½F.

 

1. :    . , pp.107, 1998.

2. :     .  

!"# 2(2), 1990.

3. $%: &'() *  . +!"# 20(11), 1999.

4. ,-:  , . /0 . "1) 23(45/, pp.34, 1991.

5. 67: 89:;  <= > ? 8@ A<45. BC

!D !E 5;FG, 1993.

6. H, IJ, K, LMNO, MP!Q.  8;R"#, 38(3), 2000.

7. ST:  UV WX, ;YZ [\& ] ^O. _`abc, def, 1995.

8. ;"g), ;"h, 12: 128, 1992.

9. BLS: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational and Health Statistics. Supplementary data system.

Washington, DC, NTIS Publication No. PB80-160507, 1983.

10. ij: (W 3 W k7l mn U Wo 

p . qjWr (W os, 2002.

11. St:  89:; uvw1  o;Bx.  8

9:!"# 12(1): 81-90, 1990.

12. Et=: &h ts E yk7 z{A< |+. Z}!D 

!E, 2002.

(Received November 25, 2003; Accepted December 10, 2003)

참조

관련 문서

with four or more years of work experience at their current workplace and among those with 10 or more dental hygienists in their workplaces. This suggests that

Abstract The purpose of this study is to provide fundamental data for managing occupational stress and promoting health by investigating the factors of dental

Their educational level affected significantly their satisfaction with autonomy(p &lt; 0.001), workload(p &lt; 0.05) and environments(p &lt; 0.05). The better educated

The purpose of this study was to examine how dental hygienists health management and to what extent they used medical care services due to occupational diseases..

ABSTRACT This study is designed to present basic materials necessary for offering the more effective way of dental hygienists, or those who are in charge of the education

Abstract About 380 dental hygienists who were working in public health centers in 2004 joined this study with questionnaires about the evaluation of job training programs