• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Preliminary Assessment Model based on BSC for Evaluating Practical Utilization of 4D CAD System

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Preliminary Assessment Model based on BSC for Evaluating Practical Utilization of 4D CAD System"

Copied!
12
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

Received August 7, 2012/ revised November 7, 2012/ accepted June 5, 2013

Copyright ⵑ 2013 by the Korean Society of Civil Engineers

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0)

 ǣŠ––’ǣȀȀ†šǤ†‘‹Ǥ‘”‰ȀͳͲǤͳʹ͸ͷʹȀ•…‡ǤʹͲͳ͵Ǥ͵͵ǤͷǤʹͲ͸ͻ

™™™Ǥ•…‡Œ‘—”ƒŽǤ‘”Ǥ”

4D CAD ⢚⡢㜚ⴖ#⢢⃲⶿#㰚Ⱨ⛯#㦇ᆾἺ#Ⳃ㬚#BSCᏮ⇖ⴖ#⯆␂#㦇ᆾ#⁦ᤶ

׌෮਎ ȵࢂ෮জ ȵԳ଴জ

Kim, HyeonSeung*, Moon, HyounSeok**, Kang, LeenSeok***

Preliminary Assessment Model based on BSC for Evaluating Practical Utilization of 4D CAD System

ABSTRACT

Recently, BIM(Building Information Modeling) is on the rise as a customized solution for construction environment, but construction companies rarely introduce and apply BIM in the construction site. Due to such issues, the fact that empirical data for evaluating the quantitative effect of BIM application is insufficient might be an another main reason. In the end, construction companies cannot assure investment effect of BIM and therefore don’t make an investment actively. To activate BIM application, the evaluation system that quantitatively assess usability of BIM needs to be developed . This study aims to suggest a methodology that evaluates the usability quantitatively according to introduction and operation of BIM by construction companies. Accordingly, this study analyzes applicability of 4D CAD by developing an evaluation index and its model with BSC(Balanced Score Card) for 4D CAD, which have high practical use among BIM techniques, and verifies the usability as the entire evaluation index of BIM. Therefore, it is expected that the developed assessment model will be utilized as the critical decision-making information in order to introduce related techniques by identifying the usability and operational issues of 4D CAD.

Key words : Building information Modeling(BIM), 4D CAD, Balanced score card(BSC), KPI

Ⅹಾ

Õᖅ⪹Ğᨱ฿∅⩶ݡ᮲ႊᦩᮝಽ↽ɝBIM(Building Information Modeling)ᯕݡࢱࡹŁᯩᮝӹ, ݡ݅ᙹ᮹Õᖅᔍᨱᕽᝅᱽ⩥ᰆᨱBIMᮥ

᯦ࠥ⦹ᩍᬕᬊ⦹۵ᔍಡ۵ᱡ᳑⦽ᝅᱶᯕ݅. ᯕ్⦽ᬱᯙᮝಽ۵݅᧲⦽Õᖅ⪹ĞᨱᕽBIM ᱢᬊᨱ᮹⦽ᱶపᱢᯙ⬉ŝa❭ᦦࢁᙹᯩ۵ᝅ᷾

ߑᯕ░aᇡ᳒⦽ᱱࠥᵝ᫵ᇡᇥᯕࡹŁᯩ݅. ᯕ్⦽᫵ᯙᮡđǎBIM ⚍ᯱ⬉ŝᨱݡ⦽⪶ᝁᮥwḡ༜⦹íࡹŁ, ⫭ᔍ᮹ᱢɚᱢ⚍ᯱࠥᮁࠥ

⦹ḡ༜⦹íࡽ݅. Õᖅᔍಽ⦹ᩍɩBIM ᱢᬊᮥᮁࠥ⦹ʑ᭥⧕ᕽ۵BIM᮹⪽ᬊᖒᮥᱶపᱢᮝಽ⠪a⧁ᙹᯩ۵⠪aℕĥaǍ⇶ࢁ⦥᫵aᯩ

݅. ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵Õᖅᔍॅ᮹BIM ᯦ࠥŝᬕᬊᨱ঑ෙ⪽ᬊᱶࠥෝᱶపᱢᯙᙹ⊹ಽ⠪a⧁ᙹᯩ۵ႊᦩᮥᱽ᜽⦹Łᯱ⦽݅. ᯕෝ᭥⧕Õᖅᇥ

᧝BIM ʑᚁᵲᝅྕ⪽ᬊᖒᯕ׳ᮡ4D CADෝݡᔢᮝಽBSC (Balanced Score Card)ᨱ᮹⦽⠪aḡ⢽᪡⠪a༉⩶ᮥǍ⇶⦹ᩍᱢᬊᖒᮥᇥ ᕾ⦹໑, ⨆⬥BIM ʑ܆ᱥℕ᮹⠪aḡ⢽ಽ⪽ᬊᖒᮥá᷾⦹Łᯩ݅. ᯕෝ☖⧕Õᖅᨦℕॅᮡ4D CAD ʑᚁ᮹⪽ᬊᱶࠥ᪡ᬕᩢᔢ≉᧞ᱱᮥ❭

ᦦ⧉ᮝಽ៉ʑᚁ᯦ࠥᮥ᭥⦽᮹ᔍđᱶ᮹ʑⅩᯱഭಽ⪽ᬊࢁᙹᯩᮥäᯕ݅.

áᔪᨕ BIM, 4D CAD, Ɂ⩶ᖒŝ⠪aᱽࠥ, ⧖ᝍᖒŝḡ⢽

‘•–”—…–‹‘ƒƒ‰‡‡– ֨ėěν

(2)

Table 1. Research Review in Korea and Abroad

Type Author Description

Work in constru-ction project

Kim(2005) Development of indexes for measuring performance of main work in construction management and suggestion of details to check them

Song(2006) Development of objective indexes for measuring performance in quality management and suggestion of quality performance process by PDCA cycle

Oh(2006) Suggestion of practical CSF and KPI by considering characteristics of domestic construction industry

Son(2007) Development of critical success factors in design phase on plant projects

Mohamed(2003) Suggestion of BSC approach to benchmarking organizational safety culture in Construction projects

Gongbo Lin(2007) Suggestion of critical review for measuring the performance of value engineering studies in Construction.

Perfor-mance measur-ement of BIM and constru-ction IT

Leem(2006) Development of a KPI-based IT evaluation methodology and its application

Lee(2009) Development of the BIM software selection factors by analyzing main function and limitation of BIM

Song(2011) Suggestion of critical factors and weak points by investigating the current status and satisfaction degree of based BIM construction projects

Lim(2011) Suggestion of valuation basis of successful cases by developing success factors and its weight in construction IT convergence

Chung(2012) Analysis of core ability of BIM manager in general contractor for systematic BIM operation

Dawood(2009) Suggestion of key performance indicators for measuring 4D CAD system in construction projects

1. ᕽು

1.1 ઴֜ଭࢼլࢫࡧୡ

Õᖅ⥥ಽ᱾✙۵ʑ⫮ᇡ░ᮁḡšญ݉ĥʭḡᩑᗮᱢᯙ௝ᯕ⥥ᔍ ᯕⓕ݉ĥಽ ǍᖒࡹŁ, b݉ĥᄥ ݅᧲⦽ₙᩍᵝℕa᳕ᰍ⦽݅.

঑௝ᕽÕᖅ⥥ಽ᱾✙aᱱᱱݡ⩶⪵ၰᅖᰂ⪵ࢁᙹಾₙᩍᵝℕe ᮹⩲ᨦŝᯕॅeᨱၽᔾࡹ۵ႊݡ⦽ᱶᅕ᮹⬉ᮉᱢᯙšญႊᦩᨱ

šᝍᯕ׳ᦥḡʑษಉᯕ݅. ᯕ్⦽Õᖅ⪹Ğᨱ฿∅⩶ݡ᮲ႊᦩᮝ ಽ↽ɝBIM(Building Information Modeling)ᯕݡࢱࡹŁᯩ݅.

BIMᮡÕᖅ⥥ಽᖙᜅ݉ĥᄥᨦྕෝᙹ⧪⦹໕ᕽၽᔾࡹ۵ᱶᅕ,

᳑Ḣ, ᨦྕ॒᮹ߑᯕ░ෝ3D ʑၹ~ℕᱶᅕෝᵲᝍᮝಽ☖⧊šญ aa܆⦹ʑভྙᨱᱶᅕᱥݍ᮹⬉ᮉᖒᮥ⨆ᔢ᜽┍ᙹᯩ݅. ✚⯩

BIMᮡ᳑ݍℎᨱᕽၽ⢽⦽ၵ᪡zᯕ2012֥ᇡ░500ᨖᯕᔢ᮹

ŖŖ▕┅Ŗᔍᨱݡ⧕ᕽBIM ᱢᬊᯕ᮹ྕ⪵ࡹ۵॒᮹ᱶ₦ᱢᯙ

ၹᩢᮥ ☖⧕ǎԕ᮹ BIMʑᚁ ᱢᬊᯕ⪶ݡࡹ۵ ⇵ᖙᯕ໑, ᯕᨱ

঑௝⬉ᮉᱢᯙBIM᮹᯦ࠥŝᬕᬊᮡÕᖅᔍॅ᮹ᵲ᫵⦽šᝍᇥ᧝

aࡹŁᯩ݅. ə్ӹݡ݅ᙹ᮹ÕᖅᔍॅᮡBIM ᯦ࠥ᮹⦥᫵ᖒŝ

ᵲ᫵ᖒᮥᯙḡ⦹໕ᕽࠥᯕෝᝅᱽ⩥ᰆᨱ᯦ࠥ⦹ᩍᬕᬊ⦽ᔍಡ۵

ᱡ᳑⦽ᝅᱶᯕ݅. ᯕ۵ᦥḢʭḡBIM ᯦ࠥŝᬕᬊᨱݡ⦽⢽ᵡ

aᯕऽ௝ᯙ, ݅᧲⦽ Õᖅ ⪹Ğᨱၹᩢࡽ BIM᮹ ᱶపᱢᯙ⬉ŝ

॒᮹ᝅ᷾ߑᯕ░aᇡ᳒⧉ᮝಽᕽ, ÕᖅᔍॅᯕBIM ⚍ᯱ⬉ŝᨱ

ݡ⦽ ⪶ᝁᮥ aḡḡ ༜⦹ʑ ভྙᯕ݅.

঑௝ᕽÕᖅᔍaBIM ᯦ࠥŝᬕᬊᨱᯩᨕᕽBIM ʑᚁᮥ᨝ษ ӹ⪽ᬊ⧁ᙹᯩ۵ḡ᪡ᯕෝ⬉ᮉᱢᮝಽ⪽ᬊ⦹ʑ᭥⧕ᕽ۵ྕᨨᮥ

ᵡእ⧕᧝⦹۵ḡෝ ❱݉⧁ ᙹ ᯩ۵ ʑᵡᯕ ᱽ᜽ࢁ ⦥᫵a ᯩ݅.

ᯕᨱᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ÕᖅᔍॅᯕḢᱲᱢᮝಽBIM ᯦ࠥŝᬕᬊᨱ

঑ෙ⪽ᬊᱶࠥෝᱶపᱢᯙᙹ⊹ಽ⠪a⧁ᙹᯩ۵ႊᦩᮥᱽ᜽⦹Ł

ᯱ⦽݅. ᯕෝ᭥⧕BSC(Balanced Score Card) ᖒŝᇥᕾႊჶುᮥ

⪽ᬊ⦹ᩍ ⠪aḡ⢽᪡ ⠪a༉⩶ᮥ Ǎ⇶⦽݅.

1.2 ઴࣐֜଍ࢫࢺ࣑

ᅙᩑǍ۵BIM ᯦ࠥŝᬕᬊᨱ঑ෙ⪽ᬊᱶࠥෝᱶపᱢᯙᙹ⊹ಽ

⠪a⦹ᩍBIM ᯦ࠥᨱݡ⦽᮹ᔍđᱶᨱࠥᬡᮥᵝŁᯱ⦹۵ᩑǍᯕ

݅. ᯕෝ᭥⦹ᩍ☁༊ᇥ᧝BIM ʑᚁᵲᝅྕ⪽ᬊᖒᯕ׳ᮡ4D CADෝᩑǍჵ᭥ಽ⦽ᱶ⦹Ł, ᯕෝBSC(Balanced Score Card) ᖒŝᇥᕾႊჶುᮥ⪽ᬊ⦹ᩍ⠪aḡ⢽᪡⠪a༉⩶ᮥ}ၽ⦽݅.

(3)

Fig. 1. Process of Developing Indexes

Table 2. 4D CAD Functions by Phase

Phase Function

Planning phase

Alternative review simulation, summary schedule simulation, arrangement/landscape planning simulation, site plane simulation

Basic design phase

Shape information 3D model, visual review of underground utilities, arrangement/landscape planning simulation, site plane simulation

Design phase

Detailed design 3D modeling, visual review of the cross section information, constructability analysis

Construction phase

4D schedule simulation, progress management simulation, visual analysis of schedule management, constructability analysis simulation, risk management, cost and resources management, wide area and long-distance management, VR functions etc.

ᩑǍ ᙹ⧪ ႊჶᮡ ݅ᮭŝ z݅.

ℌṙ, ྙ⨭Łₑᮥ☖⦹ᩍÕᖅIT ᇥ᧝᮹ᖒŝšญ⩥⫊ŝᖒŝ ḡ⢽ ᖁᱶᨱ š⦽ ᔍಡෝ ᙹḲ⦽݅.

ࢹṙ, Õᖅ BSC᮹ ʑⅩᯱഭ ၰ 4D CAD ʑ܆ᮥ ᇥᕾ⦹ᩍ

4D CAD ⪽ᬊᖒ⊂ᱶᮥ᭥⦽ḡ⢽ෝ}ၽ⦹Ł, AHP ᇥᕾʑჶᮥ

☖⧕ ᖒŝḡ⢽ॅ e᮹ aᵲ⊹ෝ ᔑᱶ⦽݅.

ᖬṙ, 4D CAD ⪽ᬊࠥෝ ᱶపᱢᮝಽ ᇥᕾ⧁ ᙹ ᯩ۵ ⠪a

༉⩶ᮥᱽᦩ⦹Ł, ᯕෝ᜽ӹญ᪅᯲ᖒᨱ ᮹⦽ᔍಡᨱᱢᬊ⦽݅.

1.3 ֝ٛ૤઴֜ܛේ

ǎԕ᫙Õᖅᇥ᧝᮹ᖒŝšญᨱš⦽ᩑǍॅᮡTable 1ŝzᯕ

Õᖅ⥥ಽ᱾✙ᖒŝšญ᪡BIM ၰÕᖅITšಉᖒŝšญಽǍᇥ⧁

ᙹ ᯩ݅.

Õᖅ⥥ಽ᱾✙᮹ᖒŝšญᩑǍ۵ᵝಽ⣩ḩ, ᦩᱥ, ᳑Ḣ॒᮹

݅᧲⦽ Õᖅᨦྕॅ᮹ ⬉ᮉᱢᯙ ᬕᩢᮥ᭥⦽ ᖒŝḡ⢽ ၰ⠪a

⥥౩ᯥᬭⓍෝ}ၽ⦹۵ᩑǍॅಽᙹ⧪ࡹŁᯩ݅. əญŁBIM ၰ

Õᖅ ITšಉ ᖒŝšญ۵ BIM ၰ IT ʑᚁॅ᮹ }ֱᱢᯙ ᬕᩢ

ႊᦩŝᅕ᪥ᔍ⧎॒ᮥᱽ᜽⦹Ñӹ, ⡍ťᱢᯙBIM ʑᚁᮥݡᔢᮝಽ

⪽ᬊࠥၰอ᳒ࠥෝ⠪a⦹۵ᖒŝḡ⢽ၰ⠪a⥥౩ᯥᬭⓍ}ၽ

ᩑǍॅಽᙹ⧪ࡹŁᯩ݅. ə్ӹᯕ᪡zᯕÕᖅᇥ᧝᮹ᖒŝšญ

ᩑǍॅᮡݡᇡᇥᵝ᫵ᨦྕӹ, BIM ၰIT ʑᚁ᮹᯦ࠥᨱݡ⦽

ᱥၹᱢᯙ ᖒŝෝ ᇥᕾ⦹Ł ᯩᮥ ᐱ 4D CAD᪡ zᯕ ᖙᇡᱢᯙ

ʑᚁᨱݡ⦽⚍ᯱ⬉ŝ᪡ᬕᩢᔢ≉᧞ᱱᮥ❭ᦦ⧁ᙹᯩ۵ᖒŝšญ ۵ ၙ⯂⦽ ᝅᱶᯕ݅.

঑௝ᕽᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵BIM᮹ᖙᇡʑᚁᯙ4D CAD᮹᯦ࠥŝ

ᬕᬊᨱ঑ෙ⪽ᬊᱶࠥෝᱶపᱢᯙᙹ⊹ಽ⠪a⧁ᙹᯩ۵ႊᦩᮥ

ᱽ᜽⦹Łᯱ ⦽݅.

2. 4D CAD ᜽ᜅ▽᮹ᖒŝḡ⢽}ၽ

2.1 নր஺ඝԹࢳଡ଍෉BSC Թ૬

BIM ᱢᬊᨱ঑ෙ⥥ಽ᱾✙᮹⬉ŝ۵ʑ᳕᮹ᰍྕᱢḡ⢽ᐱอ

ᦥܩ௝⣩ḩ⨆ᔢ, ᯲ᨦ⪹Ğ}ᖁ॒᮹ᱶప⪵a⯹ुྕ⩶ᱢ⬉ŝෝ

ᙹၹ⦹Łᯩʑভྙᨱᮁྕ⩶ᱢ⬉ŝa༉ࢱŁಅࡹᨕ᧝⦽݅(ᘂ

ၙฝ, 2011). ঑௝ᕽ4D CAD ᯦ࠥŝᬕᬊᮥ᭥⦽⪽ᬊᖒ⠪aࠥ

ᮁྕ⩶ᱢ ⬉ŝෝ ⡍⧉⧕᧝⦹໑, ᯕෝ ᭥⧕ BSCෝ ᱢᬊ⦽݅.

BSC۵ʑᨦ᮹ᖒŝෝ݉ᙽ⦽ᰍྕḡ⢽ᐱอᦥܩ௝Ł~, ԕᇡ

⥥ಽᖙᜅ, ⦺᜖ၰƱᮂ᮹4aḡšᱱᮝಽǍᇥ⦹ᩍ, ᮁྕ⩶ᱢᯙ

⬉ŝॅᮥɁ⩶ᱢᮝಽšญ⧁ᙹᯩʑভྙᨱ4D CAD᮹ᖒŝෝ

⠪a⦹ʑ ᭥⦽ ᱢᱩ⦽ ʑჶᯕ ࢁ ᙹ ᯩ݅.

BSCʑၹᮝಽ4D CAD ᜽ᜅ▽᮹⪽ᬊᖒ⠪aෝ᭥⦽ᖒŝḡ⢽

᮹ }ၽ ᱩ₉۵ Fig.1ŝ z݅.

ຝᱡ, ᯱഭᙹḲᮥ☖⧕4D CAD ᜽ᜅ▽᮹⪽ᬊʑ܆ŝᖒŝḡ⢽

⧎༊ᮥᇥᕾ⦹Ł, 1₉ᱢᮝಽᵲᱱ༊⢽, šᱱᄥᖒŖ⧖ᝍ᫵ᯙၰ

⧖ᝍᖒŝḡ⢽ෝ᯲ᖒ⦽݅. ᱥྙa᮹᮹čᙹಕᮥ☖⧕⩲᮹ࡽᔍ⧎

ᮝಽ 2₉ ⠪a⧎༊ᮥ Ǎᖒ⦹Ł ᯕෝ ᝅྕ Ğಆᯕ 10֥ ᯕᔢᯙ

᜽Ŗᯱ, ᖅĥᯱ, qญᯱ, ၽᵝᯱॅ᮹ᖅྙᮥ☖⧕ᱢ⧊ᖒᮥá᷾⧉

ᮝಽ៉ ↽᳦ᱢᯙ ᖒŝḡ⢽ෝ ࠥ⇽⦽݅.

əญŁࠥ⇽ࡽᖒŝḡ⢽ॅ᮹4D CAD ᯦ࠥŝᬕᬊᨱၙ⊹۵

ᩢ⨆ᱶࠥෝᇥᕾ⦹ʑ᭥⧕ᖅྙḡෝ႑⡍⦹ᩍÕᖅᝅྕᯱॅಽᇡ

░ ᖒŝḡ⢽ॅ᮹ aᵲ⊹ෝ ᔑᱶ⦽݅.

2.2 নր஺ඝԹࢳଡ଍෉׆ొୀ߹৤ு

4D CAD۵3₉ᬱ᯦ℕࠥ໕ŝ᜽eᱶᅕෝw۵Ŗᱶ⢽᪡᮹

ᩑĥෝ ☖⧕ Ŗᔍ Ğŝ ᜽eᨱ ঑ෙ ᜽ᖅྜྷ᮹ ᪥ᖒᔢ┽ෝ

VR(Virtual Reality) ʑᚁಽ ӹ┡ԝ ᙹ ᯩ݅.

Ⅹʑ 4D CAD۵ ᜽Ŗ ⥥ಽ᱾✙ ĥ⫮᮹ ᯕ⧕ࠥෝ ḡᬱ⦹ʑ

(4)

Fig. 2. Strategy Map for Developing Indexes

᭥⦽᜽b⪵ࠥǍ᭥ᵝಽ⪽ᬊࡹᨩᮝӹ↽ɝᨱ۵እᬊ, ᯱᬱ, ญᜅⓍ

॒᮹ ݅᧲⦽ ᇥᕾ ʑ܆ᮝಽ ⪶ᰆࡹŁ ᯩ݅(vᯙᕾ 2012).

Table 2۵ᔢᬊ4D CAD ᜽ᜅ▽ŝʑ᳕ྙ⨭ᇥᕾᮥ☖⧕Õᖅ

⥥ಽ᱾✙݉ĥᄥಽᱢᬊa܆⦽4D CAD ʑ܆ॅᮥ ӹ┡ԕŁᯩ݅.

ᇥᕾࡽ ʑ܆ॅᮡ ᔢᬊ ʑ܆ᐱอ ᦥܩ௝ ݅᧲⦽ ʑᚁᯕ ᱲ༊ࡽ

ᇡaʑ܆ॅʭḡ ⡍⧉⦹Ł ᯩᮝ໑, ᯕෝ ʑ⫮, ʑᅙ/ᝅ᜽ᖅĥ ၰ

᜽Ŗ݉ĥಽ Ǎᇥ⦹ᩍ ᱽ᜽⦹ᩡ݅(vᯙᕾ 2012).

2.3 BSC׆ࢱনր஺ඝট୨

ʑ᳕ₙŁྙ⨭ၰ ᖒŝḡ⢽}ၽᔍಡá☁ෝ☖⦽ʑⅩᯱഭෝ

⪽ᬊ⦹ᩍFig. 2᪡zᯕ4D CAD ᯦ࠥၰᬕᬊ᮹ᖒŝḡ⢽}ၽᮥ

᭥⦽BSC ᱥఖ๖ᮥǍᖒ⦹ᩡ݅. ᱥఖ๖ᮡᱥఖ༊⢽ݍᖒᮥ᭥⧕

⦥᫵⦽⪽࠺ॅ᮹ᯙŝšĥෝӹ┡ԙäᮝಽᕽ4aḡšᱱŝᖒŖ⧖

ᝍ᫵ᯙॅ᮹ ᔢ⪙šĥෝ ӹ┡ԙ݅.

4D CAD ᯦ࠥၰᬕᬊ⠪aෝ᭥⦽ᱥఖ๖ᮡŁ~อ᳒ࠥ, ⥥ಽᖙ ᜅ, ʑᚁḡᬱƱᮂၰᱶ₦, ⚍ᯱእᬊ⪶ᅕಽǍᖒ⦹Ł⚍ᯱእᬊ

⪶ᅕšᱱᯕ๖᮹aᰆ⦹ᇡᨱ႑⊹ࡽ݅. ᯕ۵ᯙŝšĥaᦥ௹ᨱᕽ

᭥ಽᱥݍࡹᨕ↽᳦༊⢽ᯙ4D CAD ⪽ᬊᖒᮥɚݡ⪵⧁ᙹᯩ݅.

ᷪ, ᩑǍእᬊၰƱᮂḡᬱ᮹ᯱᅙ⪶ᅕ۵⬉ᮉᱢᯙʑᚁಆ⪶ᅕ᪡

ᯙಆ᧲ᖒᨱʑᩍ⦹Łʑᚁಆ⪶ᅕၰᯙಆ᧲ᖒᮡÕᖅŖᔍ᮹ʑ⫮, ᖅĥ, ᜽Ŗ݉ĥᨱᕽ᮹ 4D CAD ᬕᩢ ᜽ ⪽ᬊࠥෝ ᷾ݡ᜽┅۵

ᩎ⧁ᮥᙹ⧪⦹íࡽ݅. ঑௝ᕽᯕ᪡zᮡᯙŝšĥॅᮡԕᇡ, ᫙ᇡ

Ł~᮹ อ᳒ࠥෝ ׳ᩍ ༊⢽ ݍᖒᨱ ʑᩍ⦹í ࡽ݅.

BSCʑၹᖒŝḡ⢽۵ᱥఖ๖ᮥʑⅩ⦹ᩍᩩእ⠪a⧎༊ॅᮥǍᖒ

⦹Ł, ᯕෝᝅྕᯱॅ᮹ᖅྙŝᯙ░ቑෝ☖⧕↽᳦ᱢᮝಽᖁᱶࡽ݅.

ᩩእ⠪a⧎༊ᮡÕᖅ݉ĥᄥᵝ᫵⪽ᬊʑ܆ॅŝᨦྕอ᳒ࠥෝ ⠪a

⧁ᙹᯩࠥಾྙ⨭Łₑᮥ☖⧕ࠥ⇽⦹ᩡ݅. ✚⯩4D CAD ʑ܆᮹

⪽ᬊჵ᭥a⪶ݡࢉᨱ঑௝ʑᨦ₉ᬱᨱᕽ᮹ḡᬱၰᬕᩢ⪹Ğᯕ

ၹᩢࢁ⦥᫵ᖒᯕᯩᮝအಽ, ᯕෝ ᭥⦽⠪a⧎༊ॅࠥ ⡍⧉⦹ᩡ݅.

ᝅྕᯱॅ᮹ᖅྙŝᯙ░ቑෝ ☖⧕ᖁᱶࡽšᱱᄥᖒŖ⧖ᝍ᫵ᯙ ŝ ⧖ᝍᖒŝḡ⢽۵ Table 3ŝ zᯕ ࠥ⇽ ࡹᨩ݅.

Ł~อ᳒ࠥšᱱᮡ4D CAD᮹⪽ᬊࠥ᮹อ᳒ࠥෝ⠪a⦹۵

ḡ⢽ಽ៉ᝅḩᱢᮝಽ4D CAD ᜽ᜅ▽ᮥᔍᬊ⦹۵ᝅྕᯱෝԕᇡ Ł~ᮝಽ, ⚍ᯱᯱᯙၽᵝᯱ۵᫙ᇡŁ~ᮝಽǍᇥ⦹ᩡ݅. ᯕ۵ᯝၹ ᱢᯙŁ~อ᳒ᮥ ☖⦽ Ł~ᮁḡ ၰ ᮁ⊹ᐱอᦥܩ௝ ᝅྕᯱ᮹

ᨦྕอ᳒ࠥᇥᕾᮥ☖⧕ᕽᨦྕ⬉ᮉᖒᮥɚݡ⪵⦹ʑ᭥⧉ᯕ݅.

᫙ᇡŁ~อ᳒ࠥ⨆ᔢᮥ᭥⦽⧖ᝍᖒŝḡ⢽۵ʑ⫮ᇡ░᜽Ŗ݉ĥ ʭḡᙹ⧪ࡹ۵ᝅྕ⫭᮹ᨱᕽ4D CAD ⪽ᬊ᜽อ᳒ࠥෝ⠪a⧁

ᙹᯩࠥಾǍᖒ⦹ᩡŁ, ԕᇡŁ~อ᳒ࠥ⨆ᔢᨱᕽ۵ʑ⫮ᇡ░᜽Ŗ

݉ĥʭḡbb᮹ᨦྕᨱᕽ4D CAD ⪽ᬊ᜽ᝅྕᯱ᮹ᨦྕอ᳒ࠥ

ෝ ⠪a⧁ ᙹ ᯩࠥಾ Ǎᖒ⦹ᩡ݅.

⚍ᯱእᬊ⪶ᅕšᱱᮡ4D CAD ℕĥෝ⬉ᮉᱢᮝಽᬕᩢšญ⧁

ᙹᯩࠥಾᰍᱶᱢᮝಽ᨝ษӹḡᬱᯕa܆⦽aෝ⠪a⦹۵ḡ⢽ಽ

}ၽ⦹ᩡ݅. ✚⯩ ᜽ᜅ▽ ᬕᩢእᐱอ ᦥܩ௝ ᩑǍ}ၽእ, Ʊᮂ

⬩ಉእෝ Łಅ⧉ᮝಽ៉ ḡᗮᱢᯙ ᝁʑᚁ ၰ ʑ܆ }ၽᮥ ☖⦽

4D CAD ᜽ᜅ▽᮹ၽᱥᮥ⇵Ǎ⦹ᩡ݅. ᯕෝ᭥⦽⧖ᝍᖒŝḡ⢽۵

ᩑǍ}ၽእ⚍ᯱእᵲ, Ʊᮂ⬩ಉ⚍ᯱእᵲ, ᰆእǍ⇶ᮥ᭥⦽⚍ᯱ

እᵲᮝಽ Ǎᖒ⦹ᩡ݅.

⥥ಽᖙᜅ⪽ᬊšᱱᮡ݅᧲⦽4D CAD ʑ܆ॅᮥ⧕ݚ⥥ಽ᱾✙

ᨱ ᨝ษӹ ⬉ᮉᱢᮝಽ ᱢᬊ⦹ᩍ ᔍᬊ⧁ ᙹ ᯩ۵aෝ ⠪a⦹۵

ḡ⢽ᯕ݅. }ၽࡽᖒŝḡ⢽۵ǎԕ᫙}ၽ᜽ᜅ▽ၰྙ⨭ᇥᕾᮥ

☖⧕ ࠥ⇽⦽ 4D CAD ʑ܆ ᭥ᵝಽ Ǎᖒ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ʑ⫮, ᖅĥ,

᜽Ŗ݉ĥᄥ⪽ᬊᖒᮥ⠪a⧁ᙹᯩࠥಾ⦹ᩡ݅. ʑ⫮݉ĥᨱᕽ۵

ĞšၰǍ᳑ྜྷ႑⊹, ᵝᄡ⪹Ğ, Ʊ☖⃹ญá☁᪡zᯕ}ఖᱢᯙ

ᖅĥá☁ෝ⧁ᙹᯩࠥಾǍᖒ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ᖅĥ݉ĥᨱᕽ۵݉໕᪅ඹ, ᖅĥᱢ⧊ᖒá☁ၰŖeĥ⫮॒᮹ᔢᖙᖅĥෝ᭥⦽⪽ᬊᖒ⠪aಽ

Ǎᖒ⦹ᩡ݅. əญŁ᜽Ŗ݉ĥ۵Ŗᱶၰḥࠥšญ᪡᜽Ŗᖒᇥᕾ, እᬊ/ᯱᬱšญ, ᦩᱥƱᮂ, ᖅĥᄡĞ॒᮹⩥ᰆšญᨱݡ⦽⪽ᬊᖒᮥ

⠪a⦹ࠥಾ Ǎᖒ⦹ᩡ݅.

ʑᚁḡᬱƱᮂ ၰ ᱶ₦ šᱱᮡ 4D CAD ℕĥෝ ⬉ᮉᱢᮝಽ

ᔍᬊ⦹ʑ᭥⦽ʑᚁಆŝᯕෝᙹ⧪⧁ᙹᯩ۵ᯙಆᮥ᨝ษӹᅕᮁ⦹

Łᯩᮝ໑, ᯕෝ᭥⦽יಆᮥ᨝ษӹ⦹۵aෝ⠪a⦹ʑ᭥⦽ḡ⢽ಽ

}ၽ⦹ᩡ݅. ᷪʑᚁḡᬱƱᮂᮡ4D CAD ℕĥ᮹⬉ᮉᱢᯙᬕᩢš ญෝ ᭥⦽ Ʊᮂℕĥ ၰ ʑᚁಆ ⊂ᱶᮥ ᭥⦽ ⧖ᝍᖒŝḡ⢽ಽ៉

šಉᩑǍ⥥ಽ᱾✙ᙹ⧪ᝅᱢၰ3D ༉ߙยᙹᵡ, ᱶᅕ⪵ࠥǍ

⪽ᬊᖒၰ᜽ᜅ▽Ǎ⇶ᙹᵡᮝಽǍᖒ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ᯙಆ᧲ᖒᮥ᭥⦽

⧖ᝍᖒŝḡ⢽۵⥥ಽəఉƱᮂᙹᵡၰ⬩ಉኩࠥ, ᱶᅕ⪵Ʊᮂᮥ

ᙹഭ⦽ᝁȽᯙಆ₥ᬊእᵲᮝಽǍᖒ⦹ᩡ݅. əญŁᱶ₦ၹᩢᮥ

᭥⦽ḡ⢽۵ᱶ₦ᄡĞᨱ݅ෙᷪbᱢᯙၹ᮲ᙹᵡᮝಽǍᖒ⦹ᩡ݅.

(5)

Table 3. Indexes for Availability Assessment of Introduction 4D CAD

perspective CSF KPI

C.

Customer satisfaction

C.a

External customer satisfaction

C.a.1 What is the satisfaction degree of working-level meeting with simulation in planning phase?

C.a.2 What is the satisfaction degree of working-level meeting with simulation in design phase?

C.a.3 What is the satisfaction degree of working-level meeting with simulation in construction phase?

C.a.4 What is the satisfaction degree of simulation for corporate public relations and advertisement?

C.b

Internal customer satisfaction

C.b.1 What is the satisfaction degree of business process with 4D CAD in planning phase?

C.b.2 What is the satisfaction degree of business process with 4D CAD in design phase?

C.b.3 What is the satisfaction degree of business process with 4D CAD in construction phase?

C.b.4 What is the satisfaction degree of simulation for corporate public relations and advertisement?

E.

Securement of investment cost

E.a Research support

E.a.1 How much is the investment proportion of research and development cost for 4D CAD technical development?

E.b Education support

E.b.1 How much is the investment proportion of education and training cost for manpower training of 4D CAD systems?

E.c Equipment support

E.c.1 How much is the investment proportion of purchasing equipment (hardware, software etc.) for developing 4D CAD systems?

P.

Process P.a

Efficiency improvement for

planning phase

P.a.1 What is the availability degree of scene simulation?

P.a.2 What is the availability degree of planning simulation for building arrangement?

P.a.3 What is the availability degree of influence review simulation for the surrounding environment?

P.a.4 What is the availability degree of planning simulation for the traffic management?

P.b

Efficiency improvement for

design phase

P.b.1 What is the availability degree of review simulation for the cross section errors?

P.b.2 What is the availability degree of constructability review simulation?

P.b.3 What is the availability degree of review simulation for design adequacy?

P.b.4 What is the availability degree of review simulation for space planning?

P.c

Efficiency improvement for

construction phase

P.c.1 What is the availability degree of schedule management simulation?

P.c.2 What is the availability degree of progress management simulation?

P.c.3 What is the availability degree of constructability analysis simulation?

P.c.4 What is the availability degree of cost and resources management simulation?

P.c.5 What is the availability degree of safety education simulation for safety accident prevention?

P.c.6 What is the availability degree of simulation for the design changes?

G.

Education process and

policy

G.a Technology development

G.a.1 What is the performance degree of information and technology projects related 3D and 4D?

G.a.2 What is the availability degree of 3D modeling?

G.a.3 What is the availability degree of information technology tools for schedule management?

G.a.4 What is the buid-up degree of information system (hardware, software)?

G.b Manpower training

G.b.1What is the education level of program related information technology for employees?

G.b.2 What is the frequency level of education and training implementation for employees?

G.b.3 How much is the employment proportion of new manpower trained information technology education?

G.c Policy reflection G.c.1 What is the reflection level by changing policy?

3. ᖅྙ᳑ᔍෝ☖⦽4D CAD ᯦ࠥ⪽ᬊᖒ⠪aᖒŝḡ⢽᮹

aᵲ⊹ᖁᱶ

ᦿᕽ ࠥ⇽ࡽ ᖒŝḡ⢽ॅᮡ 4aḡ šᱥᄥಽ ᔢ⪙ ࠦพᱢᮝಽ

ᖁᱶࡹᨩ݅. ঑௝ᕽ4D CAD ᯦ࠥၰᬕᬊ᮹⪽ᬊᖒᮥᱶపᱢᯕŁ

☖⧊ᱢᮝಽ⠪a⦹ʑ᭥⧕ᕽ۵እᵲᯕᕽಽ ݅ෙᖒŝḡ⢽ॅ᮹

ᵲ᫵ࠥෝ đᱶ⦹ᩍ᧝ ⦽݅.

3.1 ডࢂ୺ॷԹ૬

ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ᖒŝḡ⢽ॅ᮹aᵲ⊹ᔑᱶᮥ᭥⧕☁༊Ŗᔍ⩥ᨦ

(6)

Fig. 3. Weighting Values by Work-Scope Perspective

Fig. 4. Weighting Values of CSF by Customer Satisfaction Perspective

Fig. 5. Weighting Values of KPI for Customer Satisfaction Perspective

Fig. 6. Weighting Values of CSF by Investment Cost Perspective ᨱ᳦ᔍ⦹۵Õᖅᱥྙaෝݡᔢᮝಽᖅྙᮥᝅ᜽⦹ᩡ݅. ᖅྙʑe

ᮡ2010֥8ᬵ9ᯝᇡ░9ᬵ10ᯝʭḡ᧞30ᯝeᯕ໑, ᖅྙႊჶᮡ

ᕽ໕ ੱ۵ e-mail ၽᘂ ၰ ႊྙᨱ ᮹⦽ ໕ݕᮥ ☖⦹ᩍ ᖅྙᮥ

ᝅ᜽⦹ᩡ݅. ᖅྙ ⫭ᙹᮉᮡ ⅾ 100ᇡᨱ ݡ⧕ 60ᇡอ ⫭ᙹࡹᨕ

ⅾ60%᮹ᖅྙ᮲ݖශᮥᅕᩡ݅. ᖅྙ⩶᜾ᮡAHP ႊჶುᮥ⪽ᬊ

⦹ᩡᮝ໑, bbᖒŝḡ⢽ॅe᮹ᝮݡእƱෝ☖⧕aᵲ⊹ෝᇥᕾ⦹

ࠥಾ Ǎᖒ⦹ᩡ݅.

ᖅྙݡᔢ᮹Ḣྕ⩥⫊ᮡ᜽Ŗᔍ(60%), qญᔍ(22%), ᖅĥᔍ (18%)ಽǍᖒࡹŁ, ᖅྙݡᔢ᮹45%ᯕᔢᯕ10֥ᯕᔢ᮹ᝅྕĞಆ

ᮥ ᅕᮁ⦽ äᮝಽ ӹ┡ԍ݅.

3.2 ডࢂ୺ॷंজէր

ᖒŝḡ⢽ॅ᮹aᵲ⊹ᇥᕾᮡAHP ᇥᕾᗭ⥥✙ᭉᨕ➉┅ḡᯙ

“ExpertChoice 2000”ᮥᔍᬊ⦹ᩡ݅. əญŁᯱഭ᮹ᝁ഑ࠥෝ᭥

⧕ᕽ AHP᮹ ᯝšᖒ እᮉᯕ 10% ᯕᔢᯙ aᵲ⊹อᮥ ⪽ᬊ⦹ᩍ

ᔑᱶ⦹Ł ᨦྕᄥಽ ᜽Ŗᔍ, qญᔍ, ᖅĥᔍಽ Ǎᇥ⦹ᩡ݅.

3.2.1 ւ୥࣢ԧண౿ंজ

b šᱱᄥ aᵲ⊹ ᇥᕾđŝᨱᕽ۵ Fig. 3ŝ zᯕ ⠪Ɂᱢᮝಽ

Ł~อ᳒ࠥ, ⚍ᯱእᬊ⪶ᅕ, ⥥ಽᖙᜅ⪽ᬊ, ʑᚁḡᬱƱᮂၰᱶ₦

ᙽᮝಽaᵲ⊹a׳ᮡäᮝಽӹ┡ӽ݅. ✚⯩, Ł~อ᳒ࠥšᱱᨱᕽ ۵qญᨦྕaaᰆ׳ᮡaᵲ⊹ෝӹ┡ԕ۵ߑᯕ۵qญᔍ᮹ᵝ᫵

ᨦྕaၽᵝᯱၰŁ~ॅ᮹qࠦݡ⧪ᨱ঑ෙᨦྕᱢ✚Ḷᨱʑᯙ⦽

äᮝಽ❱݉ࡽ݅. ੱ⦽⚍ᯱእᬊ⪶ᅕšᱱᨱᕽ۵᜽Ŗᨦྕaaᰆ

׳ᮡaᵲ⊹ෝӹ┡ԙäᮡᝅᱽᨦྕෝᙹ⧪⧉ᨱᯩᨕaᰆฯᮡ

እᬊᯕ ᫵Ǎࡹအಽ እᬊ⪶ᅕᨱ ᵲᱱᮥ ࢵ äᮝಽ ❱݉ࡽ݅.

3.2.2 ճԺ࠮୻ܑւ୥

Ł~อ᳒ࠥ šᱱ᮹ ᖒŖ⧖ᝍ᫵ᯙᨱ ݡ⦽ aᵲ⊹۵ Fig. 4᪡

zᯕᇥᕾࡹᨩ݅. Fig. 4ෝᔕ⠕ᅕ໕Ł~อ᳒ࠥ᮹ᖒŖ⧖ᝍ᫵ᯙᯙ

᫙ᇡŁ~ၰԕᇡŁ~ᨱݡ⦽aᵲ⊹۵qญ, ᖅĥ, ᜽Ŗᨦྕ

༉ࢱ ᫙ᇡ Ł~᮹ aᵲ⊹a ׳ᮡ äᮝಽ ӹ┡ԍ݅.

᫙ԕᇡŁ~᮹⧖ᝍᖒŝḡ⢽ᨱݡ⦽aᵲ⊹ෝᇥᕾ⦽đŝ۵

Fig. 5᪡zᯕ᫙ᇡŁ~ᮡᖅĥ, ʑ⫮, ᜽Ŗ, ʑᨦ⪮ᅕၰŲŁ

ᙽᮝಽaᵲ⊹a׳íӹ┡ԍᮝ໑, ԕᇡŁ~ᮡᖅĥ, ᜽Ŗ, ʑ⫮, ʑᨦ⪮ᅕ ၰ ŲŁ ᙽᮝಽ aᵲ⊹a ׳í ӹ┡ԍ݅.

✚⯩, ᖅĥ݉ĥᨱᕽ᮹4D CAD ⪽ᬊaᵲ⊹۵ԕ᫙ᇡ༉ࢱ

aᰆ׳íӹ┡ԍᮝ໑, ᨦྕᄥᇥᕾᨱᕽ۵ᖅĥᨦྕa݅ෙᨦྕᨱ

እ⧕ aᵲ⊹a aᰆ ׳ᮡ äᮝಽ ᇥᕾࡹᨩ݅.

3.2.3 റୀण૳ค࣪ւ୥

⚍ᯱእᬊ⪶ᅕ᮹ᖒŖ⧖ᝍ᫵ᯙᨱݡ⦽aᵲ⊹۵Fig. 6ŝzᯕ

ᇥᕾࡹᨩ݅. ⚍ᯱእᬊ⪶ᅕᨱᕽ۵⠪ɁᱢᮝಽᩑǍ, Ʊᮂ, ᰆእḡᬱ ᯕእ᜘⦽aᵲ⊹ෝaḡ۵äᮝಽӹ┡ԍ݅. ə్ӹᖅĥᨦྕᨱᕽ۵

ᩑǍḡᬱᖒŖ⧖ᝍ᫵ᯙᨱⓑaᵲ⊹ෝᅕᯕ۵ߑ, ᯕ۵ᱱᱱᅖᰂ⪵ࡹ

۵3D ၰ4D ~ℕ༉ߙย᯲ᨦॅ᮹ᗭ᫵ࡹ۵እᬊŝ᜽eᮥ݉⇶᜽┅

ʑ ᭥⦽ ᩑǍḡᬱᨱ šᝍᯕ ׳ᦥḥ äᮝಽ ❱݉ࡽ݅.

(7)

Fig. 7. Weighting Values of CSF by Process Perspective

Fig. 8. Weighting Values of KPI for Process Perspective

Fig. 9. Weighting Values of CSF by Education Process and Policy Perspective

Fig. 10. Weighting Values of KPI for Education Process and Policy Perspective

3.2.4 ඹߦপਆւ୥

⥥ಽᖙᜅšᱱ᮹ᖒŖ⧖ᝍ᫵ᯙaᵲ⊹۵Fig. 7ŝzᯕ⠪Ɂᱢᮝಽ

ᖅĥ, ʑ⫮, ᜽Ŗ݉ĥᙽᮝಽaᵲ⊹aӹ┡ӽ݅. ᨦྕᄥಽ۵ʑ⫮݉

ĥᨱᕽqญᨦྕa׳ᮡaᵲ⊹ෝӹ┡ԕ۵ၹ໕ᖅĥᨦྕ۵aᰆ

ԏᮡaᵲ⊹ෝӹ┡ԕŁᯩ݅. ᖅĥ݉ĥᨱᕽ۵ᖅĥᨦྕa׳ᮡaᵲ

⊹ෝӹ┡ԕŁ, qญᨦྕ۵aᰆԏᮡaᵲ⊹ෝӹ┡ԙ݅. ᜽Ŗ݉ĥᨱ ᕽ۵ qญ, ᖅĥ, ᜽Ŗᨦྕ ༉ࢱ እ᜘⦽ aᵲ⊹ෝ ᅕᯕŁ ᯩ݅.

Fig. 8ᮡ⥥ಽᖙᜅ᮹⧖ᝍᖒŝḡ⢽ᨱݡ⦽aᵲ⊹đŝෝӹ┡ԙ

݅. b݉ĥෝᨦྕᄥಽᇥᕾ⦹໕, ʑ⫮݉ĥᨱᕽqญᨦྕ۵Ǎ᳑ྜྷ

႑⊹, ᵝᄡ⪹Ğá☁, Ğš, Ʊ☖⃹ญᇥᕾᙽᕽᯕŁ, ᖅĥᨦྕ۵

Ʊ☖⃹ญᇥᕾ, Ǎ᳑ྜྷ႑⊹, ᵝᄡ⪹Ğá☁, Ğšᙽᕽᯕ໑, ᜽Ŗᨦ

ྕ۵ Ǎ᳑ྜྷ ႑⊹, Ğš, Ʊ☖⃹ญ ᇥᕾ, ᵝᄡ ⪹Ğá☁ ᙽᕽಽ

aᵲ⊹a ᇥᕾࡹᨩ݅.

ᖅĥ݉ĥᨱᕽ۵ᖅĥᨦྕෝᱽ᫙⦹Ł݉໕᪅ඹá☁, ᜽Ŗᖒ

á☁, ᖅĥᱢ⧊ᖒá☁, Ŗeĥ⫮á☁ᙽᮝಽaᵲ⊹aᇥᕾࡹᨩ݅.

᜽Ŗ݉ĥᨱᕽ᮹aᵲ⊹۵Ŗᱶšญ, ḥࠥšญ, ᜽Ŗᖒᇥᕾ, እᬊ/

ᯱᬱ ᇥᕾ, ᦩᱥᔍŁ, ᖅĥ ᄡĞá☁ ᙽᮝಽ ᇥᕾࡹᨩ݅.

3.2.5 ׆২֗ଖ஺଀ࢫ୨థւ୥

ʑᚁƱᮂḡᬱၰᱶ₦šᱱ᮹ᖒŖ⧖ᝍ᫵ᯙaᵲ⊹۵Fig. 9᪡

zᯕᇥᕾࡹᨩ݅. Fig. 9ෝᔕ⠕ᅕ໕ʑᚁಆ⪶ᅕ, ᯙಆ᧲ᖒ, ᱶ₦ၹ

ᩢᙽᕽಽaᵲ⊹aӹ┡ԍᮝ໑, ᨦྕᄥᇥᕾੱ⦽⠪Ɂŝᮁᔍ⦹í

ӹ┡ԍ݅. ✚⯩ʑᚁಆ⪶ᅕaᯙಆ᧲ᖒၰᱶ₦ၹᩢᨱእ⧕2႑a ప ׳ᮡ äᮝಽ ᇥᕾࡹᨩ݅.

Fig. 10ᮡʑᚁḡᬱƱᮂၰᱶ₦šᱱ⧖ᝍᖒŝḡ⢽ॅ᮹aᵲ

⊹ෝӹ┡ԙ݅. Fig. 10ŝzᯕʑᚁಆ⪶ᅕᖒŖ⧖ᝍ᫵ᯙᨱ⧕ݚ

⦹۵ḡ⢽ॅᮡᖅĥᨦྕෝᱽ᫙⦹Ł⠪Ɂŝእ᜘⦽aᵲ⊹sᮥ

ӹ┡ԕ໑, ᖅĥᨦྕ۵3D ༉ߙย⪽ᬊࠥḡ⢽ᨱ׳ᮡsᮥw۵

ၹ໕Ŗᱶšญၰᱶᅕ⪵᜽ᜅ▽Ǎ⇶ᙹᵡḡ⢽ᨱ۵⠪Ɂᯕ⦹᮹

sᮥᅕᯕŁᯩ݅. ᯙಆ᧲ᖒᖒŖ⧖ᝍ᫵ᯙḡ⢽᮹aᵲ⊹۵qญ ᨦྕෝᱽ᫙⦹Ł⠪Ɂŝእ᜘⦽aᵲ⊹sᮥӹ┡ԕŁᯩᮝ໑, qญᨦྕ۵ᱶᅕ⪵šಉ⥥ಽəఉᨱ⠪Ɂᯕ⦹᮹sᮥᅕᯕŁᯩ۵

ၹ໕Ʊᮂ⬩ಉၰᝁȽᯙಆ₥ᬊᨱ׳ᮡaᵲ⊹sᮥӹ┡ԕŁ

ᯩ݅.

3.2.6 ડࡿ࣢নր஺ඝ૴ট০଍

Fig. 11ᮡᨦྕᄥᖒŝḡ⢽᮹aᵲ⊹ၰᬑᖁᙽ᭥ෝӹ┡ԕŁ

ᯩ݅. ᯕ۵ᨦྕᄥಽ4D CAD ⪽ᬊᖒ⠪aᨱᩢ⨆ᮥၙ⊹۵ᖒŝḡ

⢽᮹ᱶࠥෝ❭ᦦ⧁ᙹᯩí⧉ᮝಽ៉⬉ᮉᱢᯙᖒŝḡ⢽šญෝ

a܆⦹í ⦽݅.

⦽ᩩಽFig. 11ᨱᕽⅾ⧊ᨦྕᄥᖒŝḡ⢽᮹aᵲ⊹ၰᬑᖁᙽ᭥

ෝ ᔕ⠕ᅕ໕, aᰆ ׳ᮡ ᬑᖁᙽ᭥۵ C.a.2ᯕŁ, ə अ۵ C.a.1, C.a.3, E.a.1, C.b.2 ᙽᕽಽᇥᕾࡹᨩ݅. ᖅĥᨦྕᄥᖒŝḡ⢽᮹

Ğᬑᩎ᜽C.a.2 ᖒŝḡ⢽aaᰆ׳ᮡᬑᖁᙽ᭥ෝaḡ໑, E.a.1,

(8)

Fig. 11. Weighting Values and Priority List of CSF, KPI by Work-Cope

C.a.1, G.a.1, ᙽᕽಽᇥᕾࡹᨩ݅. qญᨦྕᨱᕽ᮹↽Łᬑᖁᙽ᭥

۵ C.a.1ᯕ໑, C.a.2, C.a.3, C.b.3, ᙽᮝಽ ᙽ᭥a đᱶࡹᨩ݅.

᜽Ŗᨦྕ᮹ĞᬑᨱᕽࠥC.a.2aaᰆ׳ᮡᙽ᭥ಽđᱶࡹᨩ݅.

ᯕ᪡zᯕᨦྕᄥᖒŝḡ⢽᮹ᬑᖁᙽ᭥ᨱᕽ۵Ł~อ᳒ࠥ, ⚍ᯱእ ᬊ⪶ᅕšᱱᨱᗮ⦹۵ḡ⢽ॅᯕᬑᖁᙽ᭥a׳ᮡäᮝಽᇥᕾࡹᨩ ᮝ໑, ᯕ۵aᵲ⊹ᔑᱶᨱᕽŁ~อ᳒ࠥ᪡⚍ᯱእᬊ⪶ᅕaእƱᱢ

׳ᮡ aᵲ⊹ಽ ᔑᱶࡹᨩʑ ভྙᯕ݅.

4. 4D ᜽ᜅ▽᮹⪽ᬊࠥ⠪a༉⩶Ǎᖒၰ᜽ӹญ᪅ʑၹᔍ ಡᱢᬊ

4.1 ฆ૳ܑඌԧࡦ෴

4D CAD ⪽ᬊࠥ⠪a༉⩶ᮡᖒŝḡ⢽ᄥaᵲ⊹ၰᬑᖁᙽ᭥ෝ

ʑⅩ⦹ᩍ4D CAD᮹᯦ࠥၰᬕᬊᨱݡ⦽⪽ᬊࠥᱶࠥෝᱶపᱢᮝ ಽ⠪a⧁ᙹᯩࠥಾ⦹ᩡ݅. 4D CAD ⪽ᬊࠥ⠪a༉⩶Ǎᖒࠥᮡ

(9)

Fig. 13. Weighting Values Database of CSF and KPI by Work-Scope

Fig. 14. Availability Assessment of 4D CAD Fig. 12. Process of Availability Assessment Model for 4D CAD

Fig. 12᪡zᯕǍᖒࡹ໑, ᦿᕽᙹ⧪ࡽᖒŝḡ⢽}ၽၰaᵲ⊹

ᔑᱶ݉ĥ᪡4D CAD ⪽ᬊࠥෝ⠪a⦹۵⠪a༉⩶݉ĥಽǍᖒ

ࡽ݅.

4D CAD ⪽ᬊࠥ⠪a༉⩶⥥ಽᖙᜅ۵ߑᯕ░᯦ಆ, ᱶపᱢ

ᇥᕾ, ⪽ᬊࠥ ࠥ⇽ ݉ĥಽ Ǎᖒࡽ݅. ຝᱡ ߑᯕ░ ᯦ಆ ݉ĥ۵

⠪aᯱ᮹ᨦྕෝǍᇥ⦹Łᨦྕᄥ⧖ᝍᖒŝḡ⢽᮹⪽ᬊࠥᱱᙹෝ

5ᱱ⃺ࠥᨱ঑௝᯦ಆ⧁ᙹᯩࠥಾǍᖒࡽ݅. əญŁᯕ۵ᱶపᱢ

ᇥᕾ݉ĥෝ☖⧕ᕽšᱱᄥ, ᖒŖ⧖ᝍ᫵ᯙᄥ, ⧖ᝍᖒŝḡ⢽ᄥ⪽ᬊ

ᱶࠥa ᔑᱶࡹᨕ ⪽ᬊࠥ ࠥ⇽ ݉ĥᨱᕽ 4D CAD ⪽ᬊᨱ ݡ⦽

ⅾťᱢᯙ ⪽ᬊࠥᱱᙹ᪡ ᖙᇡ ᖒŝ᫵ᯙၰ ḡ⢽᮹ ᬑᖁᙽ᭥ၰ

⪽ᬊࠥᱱᙹෝ⪶ᯙ⧁ᙹᯩ݅. ᯕෝ☖⧕4D CAD᮹⪽ᬊᱶࠥෝ

❭ᦦ⦹Ł, ⪽ᬊᮥ ᱡ⧕⦹۵ ᫵ᗭॅᮥ ࠥ⇽⦹ᩍ ⬉ᮉᱢᮝಽ 4D CADෝ ⪽ᬊ⧁ ᙹ ᯩ۵ ݡ₦ᮥ ษಉ⧁ ᙹ ᯩ݅.

4.2 ਏيࠤૈ׆ࢱॷߢୡ૳

ᅙᱩᨱᕽ۵4D CAD ⪽ᬊࠥ⠪a༉⩶᮹ᱢᬊᖒᮥ❱݉⦹ʑ

᭥⦹ᩍ݅ᮭŝzᯕaᔢ᮹᜽ӹญ᪅ෝ᯲ᖒ⦹ᩍ4D CAD ⪽ᬊᖒ

⠪aෝ ᝅ᜽⦹ᩡ݅.

ℌṙ, Õᖅ⫭ᔍᨱᕽ⬉ᮉᱢᯙÕᖅ⥥ಽ᱾✙᮹ᬕᩢᮥ᭥⦽4D CAD᜽ᜅ▽᮹᯦ࠥᩍᇡෝ❱݉⦹ʑ᭥⦽ʑᵡɝÑಽ៉ᅙ⠪a༉

⩶ᮥ ⪽ᬊ⦽݅.

ࢹṙ, 4D CAD ⪽ᬊᖒ⠪a༉⩶ᮥᔍᬊ⦹ᩍ⪽ᬊᖒᮥ⠪a⦹Ł,

⪽ᬊᖒᯕԏᮡᖒŝḡ⢽ෝࠥ⇽⦹ᩍݡ₦ᮥᙹพ⦽݅. ݡ₦ᙹพ

⬥ᰍ⪽ᬊᖒᮥ⠪a⦹ᩍ↽᳦ᱢᮝಽ4D CAD ᜽ᜅ▽᯦ࠥᩍᇡෝ

❱݉⦽݅.

4.2.1 ܁ଲഉ଺ߚ

4D CAD ⪽ᬊᖒ⠪a༉⩶ᨱᔍᬊࡹ۵ᖅᱶߑᯕ░sᮡⅾ⧊, qญ, ᖅĥ, ᜽Ŗᨦྕᄥಽᇥᕾࡹᨕḥaᵲ⊹sᮝಽǍᖒࡽ݅.

bb᮹ ᨦྕᄥ aᵲ⊹۵ Fig. 13ŝ z݅.

Fig. 14᪡zᯕᨦྕǍᇥᮥ☖⧕bb᮹ᨦྕෝᖁ┾⦹Ł⧖ᝍᖒ ŝḡ⢽ᄥ⠪aྙ⧎ᨱ5ᱱ⃺ࠥෝʑၹᮝಽ⪽ᬊࠥ⠪aᱱᙹෝ

᯦ಆ⦽݅.

⪽ᬊࠥᱱᙹ۵60%a4D CAD ᯦ࠥၰᬕᬊ໕ᨱᕽᅕ☖ᯙ

ᙹᵡᮥӹ┡ԕ໑, 60%ᅕ݅ᯕᔢᯝᙹಾ⪽ᬊࠥa׳Ł, ᯕ⦹ᯝᙹಾ

ԏ݅. ᅙᔍಡᨱᕽ۵ᨦྕǍᇥᮥ᜽Ŗᮝಽᖁ┾⦹Ł⪽ᬊࠥsᮥ

᯦ಆ⦹ᩡ݅.

(10)

Fig. 15. Results of Availability Assessment for Case Project 4.2.2 էրՑഠ

5ᱱ⃺ࠥෝ☖⦽⧖ᝍᖒŝḡ⢽ᄥ⪽ᬊࠥs᯦ಆᯕ᪥ഭࡹ໕, Fig. 15᪡zᯕ4D CAD ⪽ᬊᖒ⠪ađŝෝ⪶ᯙ⧁ᙹᯩ݅.

đŝᇥᕾ⢽ෝᔕ⠕ᅕ໕, ᨦྕǍᇥᯕ᜽Ŗᨦྕಽᖅᱶࡹᨕᯩᮝ໑,

ⅾť⪽ᬊࠥᱱᙹ۵50.15%ಽ4D CAD ⪽ᬊࠥ۵ԏᮭŝᅕ☖᮹

ᵲe ᙹᵡᮝಽ ᇥᕾࡹᨩ݅. ᅕ݅ ᖙၡ⦽ ᇥᕾᮥ ᭥⧕ᕽ ᖙᇡᄥ

⪽ᬊࠥđŝෝᅕ໕, šᱱᄥಽ۵Ł~อ᳒ࠥa51.75%, ⚍ᯱእᬊ

⪶ᅕa 46.76%, ⥥ಽᖙᜅa 60.89%, ʑᚁḡᬱƱᮂ ၰ ᱶ₦ᯕ

42.34%ಽ⥥ಽᖙᜅšᱱᨱᕽaᰆ׳ᮡ⪽ᬊࠥෝaḡ໑, ʑᚁḡ ᬱƱᮂ ၰ ᱶ₦ šᱱᨱᕽ aᰆ ԏᮡ ⪽ᬊࠥෝ w۵ äᮥ ᦭ ᙹ

ᯩ݅. 11}᮹ᖒŖ⧖ᝍ᫵ᯙᄥ⪽ᬊࠥᇥᕾđŝᨱᕽ۵⥥ಽᖙᜅ

šᱱ᮹ʑ⫮݉ĥ᮹ᖒŖ⧖ᝍ᫵ᯙᯕ71.06%ಽaᰆ׳Ł, ⚍ᯱእᬊ

⪶ᅕšᱱ᮹Ʊᮂၰᰆእḡᬱ, ʑᚁḡᬱƱᮂၰᱶ₦šᱱ᮹ᱶ₦ၹ

ᩢᖒŖ⧖ᝍ᫵ᯙᯕ40%ಽaᰆԏíᇥᕾࡹᨩᮭᮥӹ┡ԙ݅. ੱ⦽

⧖ᝍᖒŝḡ⢽ᄥ ⪽ᬊࠥᨱ ঑ෙ ᙽ᭥ෝ ᔕ⠕ᅕ໕, E.a.1, E.c.1, C.a.2, E.b.1, C.a.1 ᙽᕽಽ⚍ᯱእᬊ⪶ᅕၰŁ~อ᳒ࠥšᱱᨱᕽ ᮹ ⧖ᝍᖒŝḡ⢽ॅᯕ׳í ӹ┡ԍ݅. ၹ໕P.c.4, G.b.3, G.a.2, P.c.3 ᙽᕽಽ⥥ಽᖙᜅ, ʑᚁḡᬱƱᮂၰᱶ₦šᱱᨱᕽ᮹⧖ᝍᖒŝ ḡ⢽ॅᯕ ԏí ᇥᕾࡹᨩ݅.

ⅾťᱢᮝಽ4D CAD᮹ᝅྕ᯦ࠥᮥ᭥⦽ʑᨦԕ᫙ᇡ᮹⪹Ğ

Ǎ⇶ᯕᦥḢၙ⯂⦽äᮝಽ❱݉ࡹᨩ݅. ঑௝ᕽ4D CAD ⪽ᬊᖒᮥ

ᱡ⧕᜽┅۵⧖ᝍᖒŝḡ⢽⧎༊ॅᮥࠥ⇽⦹ᩍ4D CAD ᝅྕ᯦ࠥᮥ

᭥⦽ ⪹Ğ }ᖁ ݡ₦ᮥ ᙹพ⦹ᩍ᧝ ⦽݅.

ᬑᖁFig. 15᮹‘⧖ᝍᖒŝḡ⢽⪽ᬊࠥᙽ᭥’ෝ☖⧕ᕽ⪽ᬊࠥa

aᰆ ԏᮡ ᖒŝḡ⢽ෝ ࠥ⇽⦽݅. aᰆ ԏᮡ ⪽ᬊࠥෝ ӹ┡ԕ۵

ᖒŝḡ⢽۵P.c.4, G.b.3, G.a.2, G.b.2G॒ᮝಽӹ┡ԍ݅. ঑௝

ᕽ P.c.4 (እᬊ/ᯱᬱšญ ᜽ဍ౩ᯕᖹ ⪽ᬊࠥ), G.b.2 (Ḣᬱॅ᮹

Ʊᮂ⬩ಉᝅ᜽ኩࠥᙹᵡ)۵Ʊᮂ⬩ಉᝅ᜽ኩࠥෝ׳ᯕ۵ݡ₦ᮥ

ษಉ⦹۵॒᮹ᖒŝḡ⢽᮹⪽ᬊࠥෝ׳ᯝᙹႊჶᮥvǍ⦹ᩍ᧝

⦽݅. ੱ⦽, ⬉ᮉᱢᯙᖒŝḡ⢽ᄥݡ₦ᙹพᮥ᭥⦽⪽ᬊᱱᙹ᮹

᷾a⊹۵ ‘5ᱱ ⃺ࠥ ᯦ಆ⊹ ᷾aᇥ’ᮥ ☖⧕ ᇥᕾ⧁ ᙹ ᯩ݅.

‘5ᱱ⃺᯦ࠥಆ⊹᷾aᇥ’ᨱᕽ۵ᖒŝḡ⢽ᄥಽ5ᱱ⃺ࠥෝʑᵡ ᮝಽ᯦ಆ⦽s᮹᷾aపᨱ঑ෙⅾť⪽ᬊࠥᱱᙹෝӹ┡ԙ݅.

ᯕ۵ ᯦ಆ⊹ ᷾aᇥᨱ ᮹⦽ ⅾť ⪽ᬊࠥ ᱱᙹॅ ᵲ ᔢ᭥ 10%

sॅᯕ⢽᜽ࢉᮝಽ៉ⅾť⪽ᬊࠥᱱᙹᨱaᰆฯᮡᩢ⨆ᮥၙ⊹۵

ᖒŝḡ⢽ෝᬑᖁᱢᮝಽ❭ᦦ⧁ᙹᯩ݅. ঑௝ᕽE.c.1, E.a.1, C.a.2, E.b.1, C.a.1, C.a.3, C.b.2 ᖒŝḡ⢽a ⅾť ⪽ᬊࠥ sᨱ ฯᮡ

ᩢ⨆ᮥ ၙ⊹۵ äᮝಽ ӹ┡ԍ݅. ə్အಽ ⅾť ⪽ᬊࠥ ᱱᙹෝ

⬉ŝᱢᮝಽ⨆ᔢ᜽┅ʑ᭥⧕ᕽ۵ᬑᖁᱢᮝಽ᭥᮹ᖒŝḡ⢽⧎༊ᨱ

ݡ⦽ݡ₦ᮥᙹพ⦹۵äᯕᮁญ⦹݅. ə్ӹAHPʑჶ᮹⦽ĥಽ

ᯙ⧕⠪a⧎༊ᄥᖒŝḡ⢽⧎༊}ᙹa࠺ᯝ⦹ḡᦫᮥĞᬑ, aᵲ⊹

᮹⠙₉aၽᔾ⦽݅. ঑௝ᕽᖒŝḡ⢽⧎༊᮹}ᙹaᱢᮡE.c.1, E.a.1 ॒ᯕ}ᙹaฯᮡP.c.4, G.b.3 ॒᮹ḡ⢽ॅᅕ݅ᔢݡᱢᮝಽ

׳í ⠪aࡹŁ ᯩ݅۵ ᱱᮥ Łಅ⧁ ⦥᫵a ᯩ݅.

5. đು

ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵Õᖅ⥥ಽ᱾✙ᨱBIM᮹ᱢɚᱢᯙ⪽ᬊᮥᮁࠥ⦹

ʑ ᭥⧕ BIM ࠥǍ᮹ ᝅྕ᯦ࠥ ᱢ⧊ࠥෝ ⠪a⧁ ᙹ ᯩ۵ ⠪a

ḡ⢽ၰ༉⩶ᮥᱽ᜽⦹ᩡ݅. ᅙᩑǍ᮹đŝෝ᫵᧞⦹໕݅ᮭŝ

z݅.

ℌṙ, Õᖅᱶᅕ⪵ࠥǍ᮹ᝅྕ᯦ࠥ⪽ᬊᖒ⠪aෝ᭥⦽ᩑǍჵ᭥

ෝBIM ʑᚁᵲᝅྕᱢᮝಽaᰆฯᯕ⪽ᬊࡹŁᯩ۵4D CADಽ

⦽ᱶ⦹ᩡ݅. əญŁ4D CAD᮹ᝅྕ᯦ࠥၰᬕᬊ᮹⪽ᬊᖒ⠪aෝ

᭥⧕ᕽ BSC ᖒŝšญʑჶᮥ ⪽ᬊ⦹ᩍ ʑᨦ᮹ ԕ᫙ᱢ ⪹Ğᮥ

Łಅ⦽⠪aḡ⢽ෝᱽ᜽⦹ᩡ݅. ᱽ᜽ࡽ⠪aḡ⢽۵ǎԕ᫙ྙ⨭

ၰᔍಡᇥᕾŝ⩥ᰆᝅྕᯱၰBSC ᱥྙa᪡᮹⩲᮹ᨱ᮹⧕ࠥ⇽ࡹ

ᨩᮝအಽ ᯙᯱॅ᮹ ᝁ഑ᖒᯕ ⪶ᅕࢁ ᙹ ᯩ݅.

ࢹṙ, ᖅྙ᳑ᔍෝ☖⧕ᖒŝḡ⢽ॅe᮹aᵲ⊹sᮥᱽ᜽⦹ᩡ݅.

Ł~อ᳒ࠥᨱᕽ۵qญᨦྕ, ⚍ᯱእᬊ⪶ᅕᨱᕽ۵᜽Ŗᨦྕ, ʑᚁ ḡᬱƱᮂၰᱶ₦ᨱᕽ۵ᖅĥᨦྕaaᰆⓑእᵲᮥ₉ḡ⦹ᩡᮝ໑,

⥥ಽᖙᜅ⪽ᬊ⊂໕ᨱᕽ۵ᖙaḡᨦྕaእ᜘⦽ᙹᵡᮝಽᇥᕾࡹ

ᨩ݅. ᯕ᪡zᯕ᜽Ŗᔍ, ᖅĥᔍ, qญᔍᨦྕᄥಽᖒŖ⧖ᝍ᫵ᯙŝ

⧖ᝍᖒŝḡ⢽ॅ᮹ᵲᱱšญᬑᖁᙽ᭥ෝ❭ᦦ⧉ᮝಽᕽ⬉ŝᱢᮝಽ

4D CAD᮹ ⪽ᬊࠥෝ ⠪a⧁ ᙹ ᯩ݅.

ᖬṙ, 4D CAD ᯦ࠥᨱ঑ෙ⪽ᬊᖒ⠪a༉⩶ᮥᱽ᜽⧉ᮝಽ៉

qญ, ᖅĥ, ᜽ŖᨦྕəญŁᯕෝ༉ࢱŁಅ⦽ⅾ⧊ᨦྕᄥၰ

ᖙᇡ šᱱॅᨱ ݡ⦽ ⪽ᬊ ᱶࠥෝ ᱶపᱢᯙ ᙹ⊹ಽ ⠪a⦹ᩡ݅.

(11)

ੱ⦽ᖒŝḡ⢽᮹ᬑᖁᙽ᭥ၰ᯦ಆ⊹᷾aపᨱ঑ෙⅾť⪽ᬊࠥ

ᱱᙹᄡ⪵పᮥӹ┡ԥᮝಽ៉⬉ᮉᱢᯙᖒŝḡ⢽šญෝa܆⦹í

⦹ᩡ݅. ᯕ్⦽đŝ۵᜽ӹญ᪅ᔍಡᇥᕾᮥ☖⧕, ᱽ᜽ࡽ⠪a

༉⩶᮹ ┡ݚᖒᮥ á᷾⦹ᩡ݅.

qᔍ᮹ɡ

ᅙםྙ᮹ᯝᇡ۵2011֥ࠥᱶᇡ(Ʊᮂŝ⦺ʑᚁᇡ)᮹ᰍᬱᮝಽ

⦽ǎᩑǍᰍ݉᮹ḡᬱᮥၼᦥᙹ⧪ࡽᩑǍᯥ(No. 2011-0016064).

References

Chung, J. K. and Kim, Y. S. (2012). “Analysis of core ability of BIM manager.” Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Architectural Institute of Korea, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 175-182 (in Korean).

Dawood, N. and Sikka, S. (2009). “Development of 4D based performance indicators in construction industry.” Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 438-458 (in Egland).

Kim, H. S., Moon, H. S., Choi, G. Y., Kim, C. H. and Kang, L. S.

(2012). “Development of BIM functions and system for construction project through project life cycle.” Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Korean Institute of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 11-24 (in Korean).

Kim, Y. M., Lee, T. S., Son, J. H. and Lee, S. Y. (2005). “Novel approach in developing owner version KPI and checklist for measurement of construction management performance.” Proceedings of Korean Society of Civil Engineers Annual Conference, Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 2005, No. 10, pp. 4789-4792 (in Korean).

Lee, C. J., Lee, G. and Won, J. S. (2009). “An analysis of the BIM software selection factor.” Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Architectural Institute of Korea, Vol. 25, No. 7, pp.

153-163 (in Korean).

Leem, C. S., Yu, E. J., Moon, H. J. (2006). “Development of a KPI-based IT evaluation methodology and its application.”

Entrue Journal of Information Technology, LGCNS, Vol. 5, No.

2, pp. 21-32 (in Korean).

Lim, J. A. and Kwon, S. W. (2011). “Analysis of success factors in construction IT convergence : applying AHP.” Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Korean Institute of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp.

130-138 (in Korean).

Lin, G. and Shen, Q. (2007). “Measuring the performance of value management studies in construction.” Journal of Management in Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 23, No.

1, pp. 2-9.

Mohamed, S. (2003). “Scorecard approach to benchmarking organizational safety culture in construction.” Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 129, No. 1, pp. 80-89.

Oh, I. J., Lee, J. H. and Lee, C. C. (2006). “BSC perspective of an exploratory study of developing CSF/KPI pool in korean construction industry.” Journal of Korea Society of IT Services, Korea Society of IT Services, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 35-46 (in Korean).

Son, J. H., Lee, S. Y., Han, C. H. and Kim, J. O. (2007). “A study on the critical success factors for engineering step on plant project.”

Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Korean Institute of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 227-234 (in Korean).

Song, M. R., Yoon, S. W. and Chin, S. Y. (2011). “BSC based measurement of satisfaction degree for based bim construction projets.” Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Korean Institute of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 117-129 (in Korean).

Song, S. H., Lee, H. S. and Park, M. S. (2006). “Quality performance

management system for construction projects using quality

performance indicators.” Korean Journal of Construction Engineering

and Management, Korean Institute of Construction Engineering

and Management, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 76-85 (in Korean).

(12)

수치

Table 1. Research Review in Korea and Abroad
Table 2. 4D CAD Functions by Phase
Fig. 2. Strategy Map for Developing Indexes ᭥⦽᜽b⪵ࠥǍ᭥ᵝಽ⪽ᬊࡹᨩᮝӹ↽ɝᨱ۵እᬊ, ᯱᬱ, ญᜅⓍ॒᮹ ݅᧲⦽ ᇥᕾ ʑ܆ᮝಽ ⪶ᰆࡹŁ ᯩ݅(vᯙᕾ 2012).Table 2۵ᔢᬊ4D CAD ᜽ᜅ▽ŝʑ᳕ྙ⨭ᇥᕾᮥ☖⧕Õᖅ⥥ಽ᱾✙݉ĥᄥಽᱢᬊa܆⦽4D CAD ʑ܆ॅᮥ ӹ┡ԕŁᯩ݅.ᇥᕾࡽ ʑ܆ॅᮡ ᔢᬊ ʑ܆ᐱอ ᦥܩ௝ ݅᧲⦽ ʑᚁᯕ ᱲ༊ࡽᇡaʑ܆ॅʭḡ ⡍⧉⦹Ł ᯩᮝ໑,
Table 3. Indexes for Availability Assessment of Introduction 4D CAD  perspective  CSF KPI C
+6

참조

관련 문서

After first field tests, we expect electric passenger drones or eVTOL aircraft (short for electric vertical take-off and landing) to start providing commercial mobility

1 John Owen, Justification by Faith Alone, in The Works of John Owen, ed. John Bolt, trans. Scott Clark, "Do This and Live: Christ's Active Obedience as the

Based on the results, this study concluded that competitive power of construction business in uncertain management environment lies in human resources rather

41 Developing Web Intelligence System of Construction Tacit Knowledge Based on Text

“Simplifying Simulation Modeling through Integration with 3D CAD.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Volume 126, Issue 6, pp.

government’s assessment of the project’s technical feasibility, time for completion, and cost.. 401.649 Cost Planning for Construction Projects 10.  Scope of work at

Resource Based Construction Rate Work Based. Construction

Based on the result of such assessment, this study attempted to establish a basis for establishment of physical epidemiology research evaluation system