857
Copyright © 2015 The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science pISSN:0374-8111, eISSN:2287-8815
서 론
우리나라에서건제품은
2000
년의경우약90,925 M/T, 2013
년의경우약
136,577 M/T
로가공되고있을정도로예로부터현재까지즐겨이용하고있는수산가공품중의하나이다
(Min- istry of Oceans and Fisheries, 2014).
그러나수산물을건제품 으로제조하는주목적은예전의경우수분활성도를낮춤으로 인하여미생물의발육을억제하여저장성을갖고자하는것이 었으나(Relekar et al., 2014; Sugathapala et al., 2012),
최근의 경우저장방법이아주발달되어있어,
저장성부여목적이외에도독특한풍미와조직감을가지도록하는데있다
(Kim et al.,
2007).
이러한일면에서최근우리나라에서수산건제품에대한소비경향도변화하여조직감이딱딱한건제품보다조직감
이부드러운반건제품을선호하고있고
,
여기에식염을사용하 여저장성부여이외에적절한염미를부여한반염건품이인기 리에시판되고있다(Heu et al., 2014).
수산반염건품은동결어 류를소재로하여해동한다음내장과아가미를제거하고염지 처리한후예전의경우하루동안천일건조만을실시하였으나 최근의경우천일건조이외에도냉풍건조,
열풍건조와같은기 계건조도실시하여제조하고있다(Nuguyen MV et al., 2014).
이와같이제조한반염건어류는맛이아주뛰어나예전의경우 제수용으로한정하여이용되어왔으나
,
최근의경우제수용이 외에일반가정의고급반찬,
한식당의고급메뉴및보양식등 과같이일반용으로도즐겨이용하여왔고,
그대표적인제품이 반염건민어이다(Heu et al., 2014).
따라서이들반염건민어는 소비자의기호도를충족할수있고스토리텔링(story telling)
을시판 반염건 민어(Miichthys miiuy)의 영양 및 맛 특성
박권현·강상인
1·김용중
1·허민수
2·김진수
1*
아워홈 식품사업부, 1경상대학교 식품생명의학과/해양산업연구소, 2경상대학교 식품영양학과
Nutritional and Taste Characterization of Commercial Salted Semi-dried Brown Croaker Miichthys miiuy
Kwon Hyun Park, Sang In Kang
1
, Yong Jung Kim1
, Min Soo Heu2
and Jin-Soo Kim1
*Department of Food Division, Ourhome, Chungbuk 27650, Korea
1
Department of Seafood Science and Aquaculture Science/Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University, Tongyeong 53064, Korea
2
Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea
This study characterized the nutrition and taste of commercial salted semi-dried brown croaker Miichthys miiuy (SSD-BC). The mean crude protein content of the commercial SSD-BC was 19.8 ± 1.7% (range, 17.7-23.2%), and the mean crude lipid content was 0.6 ± 0.3% (range, 0.3-1.1%). The total amino acid content ranged from 17.08 to 18.56 g/100 g, except for sample code 5, which was 22.24 mg/100 g and differed significantly from the other samples.
The major amino acids in the commercial SSD-BC were aspartic acid, glutamic acid, leucine, and lysine. In the com- mercial SSD-BC, the calcium ranged from 11.1-21.4 mg/100 g, phosphorus from 148.4-209.2 mg/100 g, and magne- sium from 12.2-48.2 mg/100 g. Monoenoic acid (37.1-40.3%) was the most common fatty acid, followed by saturated acid (33.9-36.3%) and polyenoic acid (25.1-29.2%). The prominent fatty acids in the commercial SSD-BC were 16:0 (23.9-26.5%), 16:1n-7 (11.3-13.0%), 18:1n-9 (19.7-21.5%), and 22:6n-3 (6.9-10.7%). The mean trichloroacetic acid- soluble nitrogen content was 248.1 (range, 137.2-334.2) mg/100 g. The evaluation demonstrated that the commercial SSD-BC is rich in nutrition and taste.
Key words: Salted semi-dried fish, Brown croaker, Miichthys miiuy , Commercial seafood products
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licens (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5657/KFAS.2015.0857 Korean J Fish Aquat Sci 48(6) 857-863, December 2015
Received 1 September 2015; Revised 20 September 2015; Accepted 21 September 2015
*Corresponding author: Tel: +82. 55. 772. 9146 Fax: +85. 772. 9149
E-mail address: [email protected]
확보할수있는제품이어서
,
제조방법의표준화,
규격화및위생 성확보와같은문제점만해결할수있다면,
간고등어,
굴비및 과메기등과같이지역명품으로성장할수있는우수한잠재력 을가진전통수산가공품중의하나이다.
이러한일면에서
,
반염건민어에대한위생성확보,
표준화,
맛 과조직감을고려한고급화등에대한연구가절실히필요하다.
하지만반염건품에관한연구로는Lee et al. (1985)
의탈산소 제봉입포장에의한반염건고등어의저장중품질안정성에관 한연구, Lee et al. (1993, 1994)
의저온삼투압탈수시트처리에 의한반염건고등어의제조및품질안정성에관한연구, Ahn et al. (1991)
과Ahn and Lee (1992)
의셀로판필름포장및키토 산필름포장이반염건고등어및반염건전갱이의가공및저 장중품질에미치는영향에관한연구등과같이고등어와전갱이에관한연구가있을뿐이고
,
반염건민어에관한연구는Joo
(2011)
의해양심층수소금을이용한민어반염건품의제조및저장중품질변화만이있을뿐이다
.
본연구에서는위생성확보
,
표준화,
맛과조직감을고려한고 품질반염건민어를개발하기위한일련의기초연구로시판반 염건민어의맛과영양특성에대하여살펴보았다.
재료 및 방법
시판 반염건 민어
시판반염건민어
(Miichthys miiuy)
는2010
년6-7
월사이에 부산광역시및경상남도의재래식시장에서6
건을구입하여시 료로사용하였는데,
이중부산광역시에서1
건(sample code 6),
경상남도하동군에서2
건(sample code 1, 2),
경상남도고성군 에서1
건(sample code 3),
경상남도 사천시에서1
건(sample code 4),
경상남도 남해군에서1
건(sample code 5)
을구입하 였다.
구입한시판반염건민어의원료는원산지의경우국내산 이5
건(sample code 1-3, 5, 6,),
원산지미표기종이1
건(sample
code 4)
이었고,
이들어획지의경우제주특별자치도연근해가4
건(sample code 1-3, 5),
기타미표기가2
건(sample code 4, 6)
등이었다
.
이들시판반염건민어는체장이29.2-41.0 cm (
평균32.3±4.5 cm),
체중이530-706 g (
평균590±71 g)
이었다.
시 판반염건민어의판매형태는모두배를일부만절개하고아가 미와내장을제거한제수용의drawn type
이었다.
시판반염건 민어의 구입 가격은5,500-12,000
원/
마리(
평균9,083±2,375
원/
마리)
범위로,
수산가공품으로는고가품에해당하였고,
이 들가격은원료민어의판매시기,
선도및크기와반염건민어 의형태및선도등에따라차이가있었다.
이상에서언급한시 판반염건제품들의sampling
조건및시료의상태는Table 1
과같다.
일반성분 조성
일반성분조성은
Association of Official Analytical Chemists
(AOAC)
법(2000)
에 따라 수분은 상압가열건조법,
조단백질은
semi-micro Kjeldahl
법,
조회분은건식회화법및조지방은Soxhlet
법으로각각측정하였다.
지방산 조성
지방산조성의분석을위한시료유는
chloroform-methanol 2:1 (v/v)
을추출용매로사용하는Bligh and Dyer
법(1959)
으 로추출하여사용하였다.
지방산 조성은 추출한 시료유를 이용하여
Americal Oil
Chemists' Society (AOCS)
법(1990)
에따라지방산메틸에스 테르화한후에capillary column (Supelcowax-10 fused silica wall-coated open tubular column, 30 m×0.25 mm I.d., Su- pelco Japan Ltd., Tokyo)
이장착된gas chromatography (Shi- madzu 14A; Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan)
를이용하 여분석하였다.
분석조건은injector
및detector (FID)
온도를 각각250℃
로하고,
칼럼온도는230℃
까지승온시킨다음15
분간유지하였다. Carrier gas
는He (1.0 kg/cm
2)
을사용하였으 며, split ratio
는1:50
으로하였다.
지방산의동정은표준지방산(Applied Science Lab. Co., USA)
과의retention time
을비교 하여실시하였다.
Table 1. Brief information on commercial salted semi-dried brown croaker Miichthys miiuy used as samples in this experiment Code Body length
(cm) Body weight
(g) Origin of raw
material Caught area
Sampled Price
(won/piece) Use
Area Date
1 29.2±0.8 540±29 Domestic Jeju Hadong 10/06 7,000 Sacrifice
2 30.2±0.3 549±32 Domestic Jeju Hadong 10/06 5,500 Sacrifice
3 32.6±1.1 564±47 Domestic Jeju Goseong 10/07 10,000 Sacrifice
4 30.9±0.6 548±30 UK1 UK Sacheon 10/07 10,000 Sacrifice
5 41.0±1.4 706±44 Domestic Jeju Namhae 10/07 10,000 Sacrifice
6 29.6±1.1 530±14 Domestic UK Busan 10/07 12,000 Sacrifice
Range 29.2-41.0 530-706 - - - - 5,500-12,000 -
Mean 32.3±4.5 590±71 - - - - 9,083±2,375 -
UK1: unknown
총아미노산 및 무기질 함량
총아미노산함량측정을위한시료는반염건민어
50 mg
에6 N HCl
의2 mL
를ampoule
에넣고,
밀봉한후가수분해(110℃, 24
시간)
한다음glass filter
로여과,
감압건조및구연산나트륨 완충액(pH 2.2)
으로정용(25 mL)
하여조제하였다.
총아미노 산은전처리한시료의일정량을사용하여아미노산자동분석 기(Biochrom 30, Parmacia Biotech., England)
로분석하였다.
무기질은다량무기질인칼슘,
인및마그네슘과같은3
종의무기질의 분석을위하여
Kim (2014)
이 언급한방법에 따라질산으로유기질을습식분해하여시료를조제한다음
induc-
tively coupled plasma spectrophotometer (ICP, Atomscan 25, TJA)
로분석하였다.
Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) 가용성 질소
TCA
가용성질소를측정하기위한시료는분쇄반염건민어근육의일정량
(
약10 g)
에20% TCA 30 mL
를가하여균질화(10
분)
하고정용(100 mL)
한다음원심분리(3,000 rpm, 10
분)
하여얻은상층액으로하였다.
TCA
가용성질소함량은전처리한시료를AOAC
법(2000)
에따라semimicro Kjeldahl
법으로질소를측정한다음그값 으로나타내었다.
통계처리
분석한데이터들은
ANOVA test
를이용하여분산분석한후, Duncan
의다중위검정으로최소유의차검정(P<0.05)
을실시 하여나타내었다.
결과 및 고찰
일반성분 함량
영호남지역에서시료로채취한시판반염건민어의일반성 분함량을비교하여나타낸결과는
Table 2
와같다.
시판반염건 민어의일반성분함량은sample code 5 (
수분: 71.9%,
조단백 질: 23.2%,
조지방: 0.3%,
회분: 3.8%)
를제외하면수분의경우75.1-77.1%
범위,
조단백질의경우17.7-19.9%
범위,
조지방의 경우0.3-1.1%
범위및회분의경우2.8-4.0%
범위로크게차이 가없었다.
이와같이sample code 5
와나머지반염건민어간 에일반성분함량의차이는원료의크기이외에수분함량의경 우제조자간의가공공정,
건조일의날씨및계절등에의한차 이때문이라판단되었고,
조단백질함량의경우염건후수분함 량의차이등에의한영향이라판단되었으며,
회분함량의경우 제조자간에식염처리방법과사용한식염함량의차이때문이 라판단되었다(Park et al., 1995).
총아미노산
시판반염건민어의영양특성을살펴볼목적으로이들의총
아미노산함량을분석한결과는
Table 3
과같다.
시판반염건민 어의동정된아미노산종류는16
종이었고, cysteine
의경우검 출되지않았다.
시판반염건민어의총아미노산함량은sample code 5 (22.24 g/100 g)
를제외한다면17.08-18.56 g/100 g
범 위로,
제품간에차이가미미하였다.
한편,
시판반염건민어중sample code 5
와기타제품간에총아미노산함량의차이는어체의크기등에의한단백질함량의차이이외에도제품간의 건조정도에따른수분함량차이때문이라판단되었다
(Park et al., 1995).
시판반염건민어의주요아미노산은제품의종 류에관계없이모두aspartic acid (9.8-10.4%), glutamic acid (14.6-15.3%), leucine (10.8-13.9%)
및lysine (9.1-9.8%)
등과 같은4
종이었다.
한편Yoon et al. (2010)
은시판과메기15
건 의영양특성을살펴보는연구에서시판과메기의총아미노산 은27.42-35.34 g/100 g
범위이었고,
주요아미노산은aspartic acid, glutamic acid, leucine
및lysine
이었으며이들은전체아미노산의
41%
이상을차지하였다고보고한바있다.
따라서시판반염건민어는시판과메기에비하여총아미노산함량은낮 았으나
,
이들의주요아미노산의종류에서는차이가없었다.
이 와같이시판반염건민어가시판과메기에비하여총아미노산 함량이낮은것은시판과메기의장기간건조에의한낮은수분 함량(24.2-43.7%
범위)
으로조단백질함량(26.7-38.5%
범위)
이농축되었기때문이라판단되었다(Yoon et al., 2009).
시판반염건민어의필수아미노산은
51.7-56.7%
범위로절 반이상을차지하여이를식용하는경우영양적으로의미가있 으리라판단되었다.
그리고시판반염건민어의곡류제한아미 노산으로알려져있는lysine
과threonine
은각각9.1-9.8%
범 위및4.3-4.6%
범위로,
곡류를주식으로하는동양권국가에 서밥과함께부식으로섭취하는경우상당히의미가있다고판 단되었다.
Table 2. Proximate composition of commercial salted semi-dried brown croaker Miichthys miiuy
Sample
code1 Proximate composition (g/100 g) Moisture Crude protein Crude lipid Ash 1 76.5±0.0b2 19.4±0.1c 1.1±0.2c 2.8±0.0a 2 75.9±0.5b 19.3±0.0c 0.6±0.2b 3.4±0.2c 3 76.6±0.1b 19.1±0.0b 0.3±0.0a 3.2±0.1bc 4 77.1±3.0b 17.7±0.0a 0.6±0.0b 4.0±0.2d 5 71.9±3.2a 23.2±0.1e 0.3±0.1a 3.8±0.2d 6 75.1±0.4ab 19.9±0.1d 0.9±0.1c 3.1±0.1b Range 71.9-77.1 17.7-23.2 0.3-1.1 2.8-4.0
Mean 75.5±1.9 19.8±1.8 0.6±0.3 3.4±0.4
1Sample codes are the same as explained in Table 1.
2Different letters on the data indicate a significant difference at P<0.05.
무기질
시판반염건민어의영양특성을살펴볼목적으로이들의칼 슘
,
인및마그네슘함량을분석한결과는Table 4
와같다.
일반 적으로,
칼슘은뼈와근육에주로존재하면서신체지지기능,
세포및효소의활성화에의한근육의수축및이완
,
신경의흥 분과자극전달,
혈액의응고및여러가지심혈관계질환의예 방에관여하고(Chun and Han, 2000),
또한,
우리나라를위시한 동양권식이패턴에서부족되기 쉬운영양소
(The Korean
Nutrition Society, 2000)
로알려져있다.
그리고인은뼈,
혈액,
인지질과DNA, RNA
등의핵산과nucleotide
등에분포되어 있으면서,
신체지지기능,
신체의에너지발생촉진,
뇌신경성 분,
산-
염기의평형을조절하는 완충효과에의한정상pH
유 지,
대사과정에서생긴에너지의저장과이동및인산화반응 에의한여러효소의활성화등과같이매우중요한생리기능 을담당하고있으나거의모든식품에적정량이함유되어있어 결핍의우려가적은영양소로알려져있다(The Korean Nutri- tion Society, 2000).
또한,
마그네슘은뼈,
세포내액및외액에 주로존재하면서근육의긴장및이완,
호기적및혐기적에너 지대사작용,
효소의활성화등에기여한다고널리알려져있다(Yoshimura et al., 1991).
이와같은반염건민어의건강기능 성이널리알려져있는칼슘,
인및마그네슘과같은무기질함 량은11.1-21.4 mg/100 g (
평균17.4±3.9 mg/100 g), 148.4- 209.2 mg/100 g (
평균179.6±20.8 mg/100 g)
및12.2-48.2 mg/100 g (
평균38.0±13.6 mg/100 g)
범위들로,
제품간에차 이가컸다.
한편, Mok et al. (2008)
은53
종의수산물에대하여 Table 3. Total amino acid composition (g/100 g) of commercial salted semi-dried brown croaker Miichthys miiuyAmino
acid Sample code2
1 2 3 4 5 6
Asp 1.79 (10.0)3 1.70 (9.9) 1.87 (10.4) 1.76 (10.3) 2.18 (9.8) 1.88 (10.1)
Thr1 0.77 (4.3) 0.74 (4.3) 0.83 (4.6) 0.77 (4.5) 0.96 (4.3) 0.82 (4.4)
Ser 0.67 (3.7) 0.65 (3.8) 0.71 (3.9) 0.68 (4.0) 0.78 (3.5) 0.67 (3.6)
Glu 2.62 (14.6) 2.58 (15.0) 2.71 (15.1) 2.62 (15.3) 3.38 (15.2) 2.77 (14.9)
Pro 0.40 (2.2) 0.64 (3.7) 0.27 (1.5) 0.98 (5.7) 0.65 (2.9) 0.73 (3.9)
Gly 0.67 (3.7) 0.65 (3.8) 0.74 (4.1) 0.72 (4.2) 0.89 (4.0) 0.70 (3.8)
Ala 1.01 (5.6) 0.81 (4.7) 1.06 (5.9) 0.99 (5.8) 1.24 (5.6) 1.03 (5.5)
Val 0.94 (5.3) 0.97 (5.6) 0.96 (5.4) 0.87 (5.1) 1.02 (4.6) 0.84 (4.5)
Met1 0.68 (3.8) 0.71 (4.1) 0.66 (3.7) 0.60 (3.5) 1.39 (6.2) 1.19 (6.4)
Ile1 1.65 (9.2) 1.49 (8.7) 1.48 (8.2) 1.21 (7.1) 1.82 (8.2) 1.44 (7.8)
Leu1 2.49 (13.9) 2.25 (13.1) 2.21 (12.3) 1.85 (10.8) 2.54 (11.4) 2.11 (11.4)
Tyr 0.59 (3.3) 0.56 (3.3) 0.60 (3.3) 0.50 (2.9) 0.73 (3.3) 0.56 (3.0)
Phe1 0.72 (4.0) 0.71 (4.1) 0.77 (4.3) 0.70 (4.1) 0.93 (4.2) 0.77 (4.1)
His 0.35 (2.0) 0.34 (2.0) 0.39 (2.1) 0.35 (2.0) 0.48 (2.1) 0.39 (2.1)
Lys1 1.70 (9.5) 1.57 (9.1) 1.76 (9.8) 1.58 (9.3) 2.07 (9.3) 1.74 (9.4)
Arg1 0.85 (4.7) 0.82 (4.8) 0.97 (5.4) 0.90 (5.3) 1.18 (5.3) 0.92 (5.0)
Total 17.90 (99.8) 17.19 (100.0) 17.99 (100.0) 17.08 (99.9) 22.24 (99.9) 18.56 (99.9) EAA1 10.15 (56.7) 9.60 (55.8) 10.03 (55.8) 8.83 (51.7) 12.39 (55.6) 10.22 (55.1)
1EAA: essential amino acid.
2Sample codes (1-6) are the same as explained in Table 1.
3Value in the parenthesis indicates (amino acid content/TAA content) × 100
Table 4. Mineral contents of commercial salted semi-dried brown croaker Miichthys miiuy
Sample code1
Mineral contents (mg/100 g)
Ca P Mg
1 18.3±0.2c 185.3±1.4c 39.9±0.3 c 2 20.5±0.2d 209.2±0.6e 48.2±0.2e 3 14.6±0.3b 172.9±3.0b 41.1±0.7d 4 21.4±0.9d 191.4±1.4d 49.7±0.6f 5 11.1±0.3a 170.1±0.6b 12.2±0.3a 6 18.5±0.7c 148.4±5.2a 36.9±1.1b Range 11.1-21.4 148.4-209.2 12.2-48.2
Mean 17.4±3.9 179.6±20.8 38.0±13.6
1Sample codes are the same as explained in Table 1.
2Different letters on the data indicate a significant difference at P<0.05.
무기질함량을살펴본결과칼슘이
2.7-520.7 mg/100 g
범위(
평균44.4±78.2 mg/100 g),
인이84.8-492.4 mg/100 g
범위(
평균207.4±63.6 mg/100 g),
마그네슘이7.3-69.4 mg/100 g
범위(
평균30.4±8.4 mg/100 g)
이었고,
먹이로뼈채먹는수산 물일수록칼슘함량이높았다고보고한바있다.
이와같은시 판반염건민어에대한본실험과Mok et al. (2008)
의수산물 에대한무기질함량결과로미루어보아시판반염건민어간 에무기질함량의차이는어획지,
어획시기등에따른차이때 문이라판단되었다.
한편
,
한국영양학회(The Korean Nutrition Society, 2000)
는19-49
세성인남성에대하여위의여러가지건강기능효과를기대하기위한
1
일섭취권장량으로칼슘의경우750 mg,
인의 경우700 mg
을,
마그네슘의경우340-350 mg
범위를제시하였 다.
이와같은자료를토대로시판반염건민어100 g
을1
일권 장량에적용하는경우칼슘은1.5-2.9%
범위,
인은21.2-29.9%
범위
,
마그네슘(1
일권장량을350 mg
으로계산)
은3.5-13.8%
범위를나타내었다
.
따라서시판반염건민어의무기질함량을1
일섭취권장량에근거하여살펴보는경우칼슘의섭취면에서크게기대되지는않았으나인과마그네슘의섭취면에서는 다소기대가되는범위에있었다
.
지방산 조성
시판반염건민어의영양적및건강기능적특성을살펴보기
위하여분석한총지질구성지방산조성의결과는
Table 5
와같다
.
시판반염건민어의검출된지방산은sample code 6
을제외 한5
건(sample code 1-5)
이포화산의경우7
종,
모노엔산의경 우9
종,
그리고폴리엔산의경우18
종으로,
총34
종이동정되었 고, sample code 6
이포화산의경우6
종,
모노엔산의경우8
종,
그리고폴리엔산의경우17
종으로,
총31
종이동정되었다.
시판 반염건민어의지방산조성은제품의종류에관계없이모노엔 산이37.1-40.3%
범위로가장높았고,
다음으로포화산(33.9- 36.3%
범위)
및폴리엔산(25.1-29.2%
범위)
등의순이었다.
한 국영양학회(The Korean Nutrition Society, 2000)
에서는우리 나라국민의균형된지방산섭취를위하여포화산/
모노엔산/
폴리엔산의조성비를
1:1:1
로권장한바있는데,
시판반염건민어의이들조성비는각각
(1.16-1.41):(1.27-1.61):1.00
로의미 가있었다.
한편,
시판반염건민어의주요구성지방산은포화 산의경우16:0 (23.9-26.5%)
및18:0 (5.6-6.8%),
모노엔산의 경우16:1n-7 (11.3-13.0%)
및18:1n-9 (19.7-21.5%),
폴리엔 산의경우20:5n-3 (3.5-4.4%), 21:5n-3 (5.0-6.0%)
및22:6n-3
(6.9-10.7%)
으로지방산의종류에있어서는차이가없었으나조성에있어서는약간의차이가인정되었다
.
한편
,
시판반염건민어의지방산조성중건강기능성이인정 되는20:5n-3
및22:6n-3 (Ferretti et al., 1997)
의조성비합이10.6-14.6%
범위를차지하여,
회유성어종인고등어와정어리등에비하여는다소낮았으나의미가있는조성비이었다
.
이로인하여시판반염건민어의섭취에의한이들지방산의건강기 능성이일부기대되나
,
장기저장및유통하는경우이들지방산 Table 5. Fatty acid compositions of commercial salted semi-dried brown croaker Miichthys miiuyFatty acid Brown croaker (Area %)
11 2 3 4 5 6
12:0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 -
14:0 1.9 3.1 2.4 2.2 2.7 2.0
15:0 0.6 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.5
16:0 23.9 25.0 25.5 25.0 24.4 26.5
18:0 6.7 6.5 5.6 5.9 6.8 6.0
20:0 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.3
22:0 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2
Saturated 33.9 36.3 34.6 34.3 35.5 35.5 16:1n-7 11.3 11.7 13.0 12.5 11.8 12.9
16:1n-5 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2
18:1n-9 19.8 19.7 21.1 20.5 21.6 20.7
18:1n-7 3.6 3.8 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.6
18:1n-5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1
20:1n-9 1.3 0.9 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.2
20:1n-7 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.2
22:1n-9 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2
22:1n-7 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 -
Monoenes 37.1 37.3 40.3 38.8 39.1 39.1
16:2n-4 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.4
16:3n-4 0.6 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.9 0.6
16:4n-3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
18:2n-6 0.9 1.0 0.7 0.7 1.0 0.9
18:3n-6 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2
18:3n-3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.4
18:3n-4 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2
18:4n-3 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.4
20:2n-6 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2
20:4n-6 2.1 1.9 1.9 2.2 2.0 2.3
20:3n-6 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 -
20:4n-3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4
20:5n-3 3.9 3.5 3.8 4.4 3.7 4.4
21:5n-3 6.0 5.9 5.1 5.3 5.6 5.0
22:5n-6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.6
22:4n-6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6
22-5n-3 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.7 1.6 1.6
22:6n-3 10.7 7.6 8.6 9.3 6.9 7.0
Polyenes 29.2 26.4 25.1 27.0 25.2 25.3
1Sample codes are the same as explained in Table 1.
의산화에대한대책이또한강구가되어야하리라본다
.
한편,
시판반염건민어들간에약간의지방산조성에서차 이는원료민어의어획지,
어획시기,
가공방법,
저장방법및저 장기간의차이때문이라판단되었다.
한편, Yoon et al. (2010)
은15
종의시판과메기에대한지방산조성을분석한결과모 노엔산이36.7-48.2%
로가장높았고,
다음으로폴리엔산(31.5- 37.3%)
및포화산(20.3-27.1%)
의순이라고하였으며,
주요지 방산으로는14:0, 16:0, 20:1n-8, 22:1n-9, 20:5n-3
및22:6n-3
이었다고보고하여,
반염건민어와는상당히차이가있었다.
또 한, Yoon et al. (2010)
은시판꽁치과메기간의지방산조성의 차이는원료의어획지,
어획시기및가공방법등의차이때문이 라고보고한바있다.
TCA 가용성 질소 함량
시판반염건민어의맛특성을
trichloroacetic acid (TCA)
가 용성질소함량으로살펴본결과는Fig. 1
과같다.
시판반염건 민어의TCA
가용성질소함량은246.2-334.2 mg/100 g (
평균277.9±34.7 mg/100 g)
으로,
제품간에TCA
가용성질소함량 의차이가컸다.
이와같이시판반염건민어제품간에TCA
가 용성질소함량이차이가큰것은어획시기,
어획지,
원료어의 크기,
가공방법,
건조조건등에의한차이때문이라판단되었다.
일반적으로수산물의유리아미노산, ATP
관련물질및기타4
급 암모늄염과같은맛성분은대부분이TCA
가용성성분에포함 되어있어맛의역치(taste threshold)
를고려하지않고함량만을고려하는경우
TCA
가용성질소성분함량이높을수록맛이진하다고할수있다
(Kim et al., 2007).
한편,
시판반염건민어 의TCA
가용성질소함량이300 mg/100 g
이상인것은sample code 4 (306.9 mg/100 g)
및5 (334.2 mg/100 g)
와같은2
종이 었고,
이들은나머지시판반염건민어들(246-265 mg/100 g
범 위)
보다맛의강도가강하리라추정되었다.
References
Ahn CB, Kim BG, Lee CH, Lee HY and Lee EH. 1991. The effect of cellophane film packing on quality of semi-salted and dried mackerel during processing and storage. J Korean Soc Food Nutr 20, 139-147.
Ahn CB and Lee EH. 1992. Utilization of chitin prepared from the shellfish crust. 2. Effect of chitosan film packing on qual- ity the lightly-salted and dried horse mackerel. Bull Korean Fish Soc 25, 51-57.
Americal Oil Chemists' Society (AOCS). 1990. AOCS official method Ce 1b-89. In Official methods and recommended practice of the AOCS, 4th ed., AOCS, Champaign, IL, U.S.A.
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). 2000. Of- ficial Methods of Analysis. 16th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC, U.S.A.
Bligh EG and Dyer WJ. 1959. A rapid method of lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 37, 911-917.
Chun OK and Han SH 2000. A study on the contents of inor- ganic compounds in soft drinks. J Food Hyg Safety 15, 344- Ferretti A, Nelson GJ, Schmidt PC, Kelley DS, Bartolini G and 350.
Flanagan VP. 1997. Increased dietary arachidonic acid en- hances the synthesis of vasoactive eicosaenoids in humans.
Lipids 32, 435-439.
Heu MS, Park KH, Kim KH, Kang SI, Choi JD and Kim JS.
2014. Sanitary quality characterization of commercial salted semi-dried brown croaker. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 43, 584-591. http://dx.doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2014.43.4.584.
Joo DS. 2011. Changes in quality of salted and dried brown- croaker product prepared with deep seawater salt. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 40, 235-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.3746/
jkfn.2011.40.2.235.
Kim JS, Heu MS, Kim HS and Ha JH. 2007. Fundamental and Application of Seafood Processing. Hyoil Publishing Co., Seoul, Korea, 118-120.
Kim KH. 2014. Concentration and risk assessment of heavy metal in mainly consumed fishes. MS thesis. Gyeongsang National University, Tongyeong, Korea.
Lee EH, Chung YH, Joo DS, Kim JH and Oh KS. 1985. The storage stability of semi-salted and dried mackerel by free- oxygen absorber. Bull Korean Fish Soc 18, 131-138.
Lee JS, Joo DS, Kim JS, Cho SY and Lee EH. 1993. Processing of a good quality salted and semi-dried mackerel by high osmotic pressure resin dehydration under cold condition.
Korean J Food Sci Technol 25, 468-474.
Lee JS, Joo DS, Kim JS, Cho SY and Lee EH. 1994. The quality of a good quality salted and semi-dried mackerel processed by cold osmotic dehydration during storage. Korean J Food Sci Technol 26, 422-427.
Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries. 2014. Fisheries information Fig. 1. Trichloroacetic acid (TCA)-soluble nitrogen contents of
commercial salted semi-dried brown croaker Miichthys miiuy.
1Sample codes (1-6) are the same as explained in Table 1.
2Different letters on the data indicate a significant difference at P<0.05.
264.5b
334.2d 256.9b2
258.7b
306.9c
246.2a
0 100 200 300 400
6 5 4 3 2 1
S am pl e cod e
1TCA soluble-N (mg/100 g)
service. Retrieved from http://www.mof.go.kr/article/view.
do?articleKey=5197&boardKey=32&menuKey=396&curr entPageNo=1 on August 18.
Mok JS, Lee DS and Yoon HD. 2008. Mineral content and nutritional evaluation of fishes from the Korean coast.
J Kor Fish Soc 41, 315-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.5657/
kfas.2008.41.5.315
Nuguyen MV, Arason S and Eikevik TM. 2014. Drying of fish.
In: Seafood Processing-Technology, Quality and Safety. Bo- ziaris IS, ed. Wiley Blackwell & Son, Ltd. West Sussex, UK, 161-176.
Park YH, Chang DS and Kim SB. 1995. Processing and Utiliza- tion of Seafoods. Hyungsul Publishing Co., Seoul, Korea, 73-79, 685-725.
Relekar SS, Joshi SA, Gore SB and Kulkami AK. 2014. Effect of improved drying methods on biochemical and microbio- logical quality of dried small head ribbon fish, Lepturacan
thus savala. International J Fish Aquatic Studies 1, 60-66.
Sugathapala RMNS, Suntharabarathy TV and Edirisinghe U.
2012. Salt based dry fish processing and marketing by fish- ers of minneriya reservoir in Sri Lanka. Tropical Agricult Res 23, 357-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/tar.v23i4.4871 The Korean Nutrition Society. 2000. Recommended Dietary Al-
lowances for Koreans (7th ed.), Chungang Publishing Co., Seoul, Korea, 43-56, 157-218.
Yoon MS, Heu MS and Kim JS. 2010. Fatty acid composi- tion, total amino acid and mineral contents of commer- cial Kwamegi. J Kor Fish Soc 43, 100-108. http://dx.doi.
org/10.5657/kfas.2010.43.2.100.
Yoon MS, Kim HJ, Park KH, Shin JH, Jung IK, Heu MS and Kim JS. 2009. Biogenic amine content and hygienic quality characterization of commercial Kwamegi. J Kor Fish Soc 42, 403-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.5657/kfas.2009.42.5.403.
Yoshimura M, Takahashi H and Nakanishi T. 1991. Role of so- dium, potassium, calcium, magnesium on blood pressure regulation and antihypertensive dietary therapy. Japan J Nutr 49, 53-62.