2 002 , V ol. 13, N o.2 p p . 1~10
E s tim ation o f th e p aram e t e r in an E x pon e n ti al D i s tribu tion u s in g a LIN E X L o s s
Jun g s o o W o o 1 ) , H w ajun g L e e , K ab s o ok E u n 2 )
A b s tra c t
A Bay e s estim at or of th e s cale par am et er in an ex pon en tial dist ribu t ion w ill b e con sider ed by a LIN EX err or , t h en t h e risk of t h e B ay es estim at or u sin g a LINE X los s w ill b e com pared w it h th at of a B ay es est im at or u sin g a squ ar e error .
K e y w o rd s : LINEX err or , S qu ar e error , P rior pdf, B ay es risk .
1 . A LIN E X lo s s an d a s t an d ard e x po n e n ti al prio r
F or cert ain t y pes of los s fun ction s , ex pr es sion s for t h e Bay es est im at or can b e det erm in ed . A s u su al, sy m m et ric los s fun ct ion of s qu ar e err or los s an d, ab s olut e err or los s ar e u s ed in B ay es an aly sis , s o th eir risk s can b e com p ar ed each oth er . Bu t LINE X a sy m m et ric los s fu ction h a s b een u sefu l w h en a g iv en positiv e e st im at ion err or is r eg ar ded a s m or e seriou s t h an a n eg at iv e err or . S o w e can ch oose a sy m m etric LIN EX los s fu n ct on t h at h a s b een u su ally applied t o econ om et rics . LINEX los s fun ction w a s ex t en siv ely discu s s ed by Zelln er (1986 ).
M any au t h or s h av e cosider ed a sy m m et ric lin ear los s fun ct ion s , specially Zelln er (1986 ) stu died a v ery u s efu l a sy m m etric LIN EX los s fu n ction . it rise s appr ox im at edly ex pon en t ially on on e side of zer o an d appr ox im at ely lin early on t h e ot h er side.
S o far , w e don ' t h av e com parison b et w een t w o Bay es risk s of p ar am et er in an ex p on ent ial dist ribu tion by LIN EX los s an d s qu ar e los s , s o w e n eed t o com par e
1. Professor, Department of Math. & Stat., Yeungnam University, Kyongsan, 712-749, Korea
2. Graduate Student, Department of Math. & Stat., Yeungnam University, Kyongsan, 712-749, Korea
t h eir Bay es risk s .
W e sh all con sider t h e follow in g ex p on ent ial pdf (Roh at g i (1976 )):
f ( x ; ) = e
- x, x > 0, w h er e > 0. (1.1) T h e B ay es est im at or of th e p ar am et er w ill b e con sidered by a LIN EX err or los s an d a st an dard ex pon en tial prior :
( ) = e
-, > 0. (1.2)
W e sh all com pare t h e Bay es risk of a Bay e s est im at or of th e par am et er in an ex p on ent ial distribut ion u sin g a LIN EX error los s an d a st an dar d ex pon en tial prior w it h t h at of a B ay es est im at or of t h e par am et er in an ex p on ent ial dist ribu tion u sin g a s qu ar e err or los s an d a st an dar d ex p on ent ial prior w h ich w e h av e w ell k n ow n .
1 - 1 . L IN E X e rror l o s s
In t his section a st an dar d ex p on ent ial prior den sit y w ill b e u s ed a s (1.2), an d a LINE X err or los s w ill b e u s ed a s follow :
L (d , ( ) ) = e
d - ( )- ( d - ( ) ) - 1 (s ee S adoogh i- A lv an di (1990)) A s su m e X
1 ,X
2 ,. . . , X
nb e a sim ple r an dom s am ple fr om t h e den sit y (1.1).
T h en t h e j oint pdf of X
1, X
2, . . . , X
nis f ( x
1, x
2, . . . , x
n) =
ne
-n i = 1xi
. F or t h e st an dar d ex pon en tial prior , t h e j oin t pdf of X
1, X
2, . . . , X
nan d is
f ( x
1 ,x
2 ,. . . , x
n, ) =
ne
- ( 1 +
n i = 1xi)
,
an d h en ce fr om t h e form u la 3.381(4 ) of Gra dsht ey n & Ry zhik (1965 ), t h e m ar g in al j oin t p df of X
1, X
2, . . . , X
nis
f ( x
1, x
2, . . . , x
n) = n ! ( 1 +
n
i = 1
x
i)
n + 1.
T h er efor e, t h e post erior pdf of can b e obt ain ed : h ( x
1, . . . , x
n) = ( 1 +
n
i = 1
x
i)
n + 1 ne
- ( 1 +
n i = 1xi)
/ ( n + 1) . (1.3) w h ich follow s a g am m a dist ribu t ion w it h p ar am et er s n +1 an d 1
1 +
n i = 1
x
i.
By th e post erior pdf (1.3 ) an d th e r esu lt in S adooghi - A lv an di (1990), un der t h e
LIN EX err or los s , w e can ob t ain a B ay es estim at or of :
*
l
- ln E (e
-X
1, . . . , X
n)
= ( n + 1) ln 2 +
n
i = 1
X
i1 +
n i = 1
X
i. (1.4 )
T h e Bay es risk of
*lun der a LINEX err or los s can b e obt ain ed a s follow in g s : R
l( ,
*l) E [ E (e
* l-
- (
*l- ) - 1) ]
= E ( - 1) + E [ e
-E ( ( 2 +
n i = 1
X
i1 +
n i = 1
X
i)
n + 1) ] - ( n + 1) E [ E ( ln 2 +
n i = 1
X
i1 +
n i = 1
X
i) ] (1.5 )
By th e st an dar d ex p on ent ial prior , th e Ist t erm in 2n d equ alit y (1.5 ) is zer o, b y th e form ula s 3.381(4 ) an d 3.914 (4 ) of Gra dsht ey n & Ry zh ik (1965 ), th e ex p ect ation of th e 2n d t erm in 2n d equ alit y (1.5 ) is 1,
b y form ula 3.381(4) of Gr adsht ey n & Ry zhik (1965), t h e ex pect at ion of th e 3r d t erm in 2n d equ alit y (1.5 ) can b e obt ain ed a s :
n
0y
n - 1( 1 + y )
n + 1ln 2 + y 1 + y dy . T h er efor e, t h e Bay es risk is 1- n (n +1)
0
y
n - 1( 1 + y )
n + 1ln 2 + y
1 + y dy . (1.6 ) w h ich th e in t eg r al in (1.6) conv er g es by t h e adv an ced calculation .
T h e int egr al in (1.6 ) =
0
y
n - 1( 1 + y )
n + 1ln (2 + y ) dy -
0
y
n - 1( 1 + y )
n + 1ln (1 + y ) dy
=
0y
n - 1( 1 + y )
n + 1ln (2 + y ) dy - B ( n , 1) ( ( n + 1) - ( 1) ) by 4.293 (14 ) of Gr ad sh t ey n & Ry zhik (1965 ),
=
1
0
( 1 - x )
n - 1ln ( x + 1
x ) dx - B ( n , 1) ( ( n + 1) - (1) ) by x = 1
y + 1 an d B (x ,y ) is a Bet a fun ct ion ,
=
n - 1 k = 0
n - 1
( k ) ( - 1)k[
01x
kln (1 + x ) dx -
1
0
x
kln x dx ] - n
- 1( ( n + 1) - ( 1) )
by t h e Bin om ial ex pan sion an d L ' H ospit al rule,
=
n - 1 k = 0
n - 1
( k ) ( - 1)k[ k + 1 1 ln 2 +
1 0
1
k + 1 x
kdx
- 1 k + 1
1 0
x
k + 11 + x dx ] - n
- 1( ( n + 1) - ( 1) ) , by t h e part ial int egr at ion .
=
n - 1 k = 0
n - 1
( k ) ( - 1)k[ k + 1 1 ln 2 + 1 ( k + 1)
2 ,
- 1
k + 1
2 1
( y - 1)
k + 1y dy ] - n
- 1( ( n + 1) - ( 1) ) , (1.7) by a t ran sform at ion 1+x =y ,
w h er e B ( a , b) = ( a) ( b)
( a + b) an d ( x ) is t h e p si - fu n ct ion . T h e int egr al in th e la st equ ality (1.7 ),
2 1
( y - 1)
k + 1y dy =
k + 1 j = 0
k + 1
( j ) ( - 1)k + 1 - j 12y
j - 1dy
= ( - 1)
k + 1ln 2 +
k + 1 j = 1
k + 1
( j ) ( - 1)k + 1 - j ( 2
jj - 1) (1.8 ) F r om th e r esu lt s (1.6 ), (1.7 ) an d (1.8 ),
t h e By es risk of
*lun der a LINE X err or los s can b e obt ain ed : R
l( ,
*l) =1- n (n +1){
n - 1 k = 0
n - 1
( k ) ( - 1)k[ k + 1 1 ln 2 + 1 ( k + 1)
2
- 1
k + 1 ( - 1)
k + 1ln 2 - 1 k + 1
k + 1 j = 1
k + 1
( j ) ( - 1)k + 1 - j ( 2
jj - 1) ]
- n
- 1[ ( n + 1) - ( 1) ] } (1.9 )
1 - 2 . S qu are e rro r lo s s
On t h e oth er h an d , by u sin g a s qu ar e err or los s an d a st an dar d ex p on ent ial prior , a B ay es est im at or of th e p ar am et er in an ex pon en tial dist rib ut ion w it h th e p df (1.1) an d it s B ay es risk ar e w ell kn ow n a s
t h e B ay es estim at or of an d it s Bay e s risk are
*
s
= n + 1 1 +
n i = 1
X
i. (1.10)
an d R
s( ,
*s) = 2
n + 2 , re spectiv ely . (1.11)
F urt h erm or e, fr om t h e post erior pdf (1.3), w e can obt ain t h e g en er alized
M LE (m ode ) of λ:
*
m
n
1 +
n i = 1
X
i(1.12)
B a sed on th e m ode (1.12) an d th e form u la s 3.381(4 ) an d 3.914 (3 ) of Gr ad sh t ey n &
Ry zhik (1965), th en t h e B ay es risk of th e m ode
*mun der a squ ar e err or los s is :
R
s( ,
*m) = 2
n + 1 (1.13)
F r om t h e B ay es risk s (1.11) an d (1.13 ), it ' s n o w on der t h at t h e B ay es est im at or h a s les s B ay es risk th an th e m ode un der th e s qu ar e err or los s . A n d fr om t h e r esult s (1.10) an d (1.12), th e m ode locat es at t h e left side of t h e B ay es e st im at or u n der t h e post erior den sity cu rv e.
On t h e ot h er h an d , by th e post erior pdf (1.3 ), 2 ( 1 +
n
i = 1
X
i) ( x
1, . . . , x
n) follow s a ch i- squ ar e dist ribu tion w it h a df 2 (n +1), an d h en ce, w e can obt ain a Bay es con fiden ce int erv al :
(
2
2 ( n + 1) , / 2
2 ( 1 +
n i = 1
X
i)
,
2
2 ( n + 1) , 1 - / 2
2 ( 1 +
n i = 1
X
i)
) is a (1- ) 100% B ay es confiden ce in t erv al of .
2 . A LIN E X lo s s an d a g am m a prior
T h e B ay es est im at or of th e p ar am et er w ill b e con sidered by a LIN EX err or los s an d a g am m a prior :
( ) = ( )
- 1
e
-, >0 (2.1)
W e sh all com pare t h e Bay es risk of a Bay e s est im at or of th e par am et er in an ex p on ent ial distribut ion u sin g a LIN EX error los s an d a g am m a prior w it h t h at of a B ay es estim at or of th e par am et er in an ex pon en t ial dist ribu tion u sin g a squ ar e err or los s an d a g am m al prior w hich w e h av e w ell kn ow n .
2 - 1 . L IN E X e rror l o s s
T h e Bay es estim at or of t h e p ar am et er w ill b e con sider ed by a LINEX err or
los s :
L (d , ( ) ) = e
d - ( )- ( d - ( ) ) - 1 (see S adoogh i- A lv an di (1990)) and a gamma prior density (2.1).
.
A s su m e X
1 ,X
2 ,. . . , X
nb e a sim ple r an dom sam ple fr om th e den sit y (1.1). T h en t h e j oint pdf of X
1, X
2, . . . , X
nis f ( x
1, x
2, . . . , x
n) =
ne
- n
i = 1xi
.
F or th e g am m a prior , th e j oint pdf of X
1, X
2, . . . , X
nan d is f ( x
1 ,x
2 ,. . . , x
n, ) =
( )
n + - 1
e
- (
n i = 1xi+ )
,
an d t h e m ar g in al j oin t p df of X
1, X
2, . . . , X
nis f ( x
1, x
2, . . . , x
n) = ( n + )
( )(
n
i = 1
x
i+ )
n +.
T h er efor e, th e post erior pdf of can b e obt ain ed :
h ( x
1, . . . , x
n) = (
n
i = 1
x
i+ )
n +( n + )
n + - 1
e
- (
n i = 1xi+ )
. (2.2)
w hich follow s a g am m a dist ribu tion w it h par am et er s n + an d 1
n i = 1
x
i+
.
By th e post erior pdf (2.2) an d t h e re sult in S adoogh i- A lv an di (1990), u n der t h e LIN EX err or los s w e can obt ain a Bay es e st im at or of :
*
l
- ln E (e
-X
1, . . . , X
n)
= - ( n + ) ln
n i = 1
X
i+
n
i = 1
X
i+ + 1
(2.3)
fr om th e form ula 3.381(4) of Gr ad sht ey n & Ry zh ik (1965 ).
T h e Bay es risk of
*lu n der a LINEX err or los s can b e obt ain ed a s follow in g s :
R
l( ,
*l) E [ E (e
* l-
- (
*l- ) - 1) ]
= ( n + ) ( n ) ( )
0y
n - 1( y + )
n +dy - ( n + )( n + ) ( n ) ( )
0
y
n - 1( y + )
n +ln y + + 1
y + dy + - 1
fr om t h e form u la 3.381(4 ) of Gra dsht ey n & Ry zhik (1965 ).
= - n +
B ( n , )
1
0
( 1 - t)
n - 1t
- 1ln (1 + t ) d t, by in t egr at ion (1.4 ) an d
y + t,
= - n +
B ( n , )
n - 1 k = 0
n - 1
( k ) ( - 1)k k + 1 [ ln (1 + 1
) - 1
( k + + 1) F ( 1; k + + 1; k + + 2; - 1
) ] , (2.4)
from t h e form u la 3.381(4 ) of Gr ad sh t ey n & Ry zhik (1965), w h er e B (x ,y ) an d F (a ;b ;c ;x ) are t h e b et a fu n ct ion an d th e h y per g eom et ric fun ction , r espect iv ely , in Gr adsht ey n & Ry zh ik (1965 ),
H er e, alth ou gh a st an dar d ex pon en tial prior is a special ca se of a g am m a prior , it is n ot ea sy for u s t o sh ow th at th e B ay es risk (2.4 ) can r epre sen t by t h e risk (1.9 ) w h en α=1 an d β=1 in t h e g am m a prior . T h er efor e, w e h av e con sider ed t w o s epar at ed sect ion s .
1 - 2 . S qu are e rro r lo s s
On t h e ot h er h an d , by u sin g a squ are err or los s an d a g am m a prior , a Bay es e st im at or of th e p ar am et er in an ex pon ent ial dist ribu tion w it h th e pdf (1.1) an d it s B ay es risk ar e w ell kn ow n a s
t h e B ay es estim at or of is
*
s
= n +
n i = 1
X
i+
. (2.5 )
T o fin d it s B ay es risk , Let I ( n ; n + + 2 )
0
y
n - 1( y + )
n + + 2dy = 1
+ 2
B ( + 2 , n ) , (2.6 ) fr om in t egr at ion by su b st itu tion , t
y + , w h er e B (x ,y ) is a b et a fu n ct ion . F r om th e in t egr at ion (2.6 ) an d th e form ula 3.381(4 ) of Gr ad sh t ey n &
Ry zhik (1965), w e can ob t ain t h e Bay e s risk of t h e Bay es e st im at or
*sun der a
s qu ar e err or los s :
R
s( ,
*s) =
( )
0+ 1
e
-d - 2 ( n + )
( n ) ( )
0y
n - 1y +
0
n + - 1
e
- ( y + )d dy + ( n + )
2( n ) ( )
0y
n - 1( y + )
20
n + - 1
e
- ( y + )dy d
= ( + 1)
2
- ( n + )
2( n + )
( n ) ( ) I ( n ; n + + 2) , by in t egr al (1.5 ),
= ( + 1)
2
( n + + 1) . (2.7)
F r om t h e p ost erior p df (2.2), th e g en er alized M LE of is n + - 1
n i = 1
X
i+
, w hich
locat e s at a left of t h e B ay es estim at e of u n der th e post erior pdf (2.2) .
F or a giv en 0< γ< 1,
a 0
1
( ) x
- 1e
- xdx = , defin e a
*( ; ) .
F r om t h e p ost erior p df (2.2), 2 (
n
1
X
i+ ) follow s a g am m a dist ribu tion w ith a sh ape p ar am et er n +α an d a s cale p ar am et er 2, fr om defin it ion of
*an d th e
p ost erior pdf (2.2) of , (
*
( ;
2 ) 2 (
n
i = 1
X
i+ ) ,
*
( ; 1 - 2 ) 2 (
n
i = 1
X
i+ )
) can b e obt ain ed a s an
(1- γ)100% B ay es confiden ce in t erv al for . (2.8 )
By t h e Bay es risk s (1.9 ) an d (1.11) an d T able s of t h e p si- fun ct ion in A br am ow it z & S t eg un (1970), an d th e Bay es risk s (2.4) an d (2.7 ) an d t h e r ecu r sion form u la of hy p er g eom etric fu n ct ion in A br am ow it z & S t egu n (1970), T able 1 sh ow s B ay es risk s of t w o B ay es estim at or s un der t w o differ en t err or los s es .
T able 1. B ay es risk s of t w o Bay e s e st im at or s
*san d
*lb a s ed on a g am m a
prior an d a st an dar d prior
n = 1
2 , = 1 = 1 , = 1 = 2 , = 1
* s
* l
* s
* l
* s
* l
5 0.11538 0.047776 0.2857 1 0.11574 0.75000 0.2932 1
10 0.06522 0.028943 0.16667 0.07270 0.46154 0.19533
15 0.04545 0.020824 0.11765 0.053 15 0.33333 0.14686 20 0.03488 0.0 16276 0.0909 1 0.04 193 0.26087 0.11778 25 0.02830 0.0 13364 0.07407 0.03463 0.2 1429 0.09836 30 0.0238 1 0.0 11338 0.06250 0.0295 1 0.18 182 0.08445
(to continue)
n = 1
2 , = 2 = 2 , = 2 = 1
2 , = 1
2 = 2 , = 1
2
* s
* l
* s
* l
* s
* l
* s
* l