• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Effectiveness of Continuing Low Central Venous Pres- sure during Major Hepatic Resection

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Effectiveness of Continuing Low Central Venous Pres- sure during Major Hepatic Resection"

Copied!
5
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

Effectiveness of Continuing Low Central Venous Pres- sure during Major Hepatic Resection

Sunhwi Hwang, M.D., Kihun Kim, M.D.1, Yeogoo Chang, M.D., Seongwoo Hong, M.D., Inwook Paik, M.D. and Hyucksang Lee, M.D.

Department of Surgery, University of Inje College of Medicine, Seoul Paik Hospital, 1Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea

Background/Aims: Blood loss and blood transfusion are ex- tremely important determinants of morbidity and mortality fol- lowing hepatic resection. This is attributed to increased risks of coagulopathy, acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiorgan failure. The hypothesis is that a low pressure in the central veins would be accompanied by a low pressure in the hepatic veins and sinusoids, thereby decreasing blood loss during hepatic resection. This study evaluates the effec- tiveness of continuing low central venous pressure comparing with high central venous pressure during major hepatic resec- tion.

Methods: 20 consecutive major hepatic resections between March 2000 and August 2000 were studied prospectively con- cerning central venous pressure which was analysed for 10 cases with a central venous pressure less than 10 mmHg,

and greater than or equal to 10 mmHg. The central venous pressure was monitored continuously using a Narkomed An- aesthetic Component Monitoring System (Dräger Inc., USA).

Results: Low central venous pressure allowed a smaller intraoperative blood loss ( 10 mmHg: 1010±465.3 ml vs.

10 mmHg: 1770±916.5 ml, p 0.05), a smaller periopera- tive transfusion ( 10 mmHg: 139±276.2 ml vs. 10 mmHg: 807±799.2 ml, p 0.05), a lower postoperative peak AST ( 10 mmHg: 167.4±53.2 IU/L vs. 10 mmHg: 293.0

±123.2 IU/L, p 0.05), a lower postoperative peak ALT ( 10 mmHg: 96.1±55.3 IU/L vs. 10 mmHg: 193.2±103.5 IU/L, p 0.05), and a earlier resumption of a normal hepatic enzyme ( 10 mmHg: 6.4±0.9 days vs. 10 mmHg: 8.7±

1.6 days, p 0.05) in comparison to high central venous pressure. There was no postoperative mortality in both group.

Conclusions: Maintaining a low central venous pressure throughout major hepatic resection reduced blood loss, blood transfusion requirements and enzyme recovery periods. Low- ering the central venous pressure is a simple and effective way during hepatic resection. (Korean J HBP Surg 2002;

6:48-52)

Key Words: Low central venous pressure, High central ve- nous pressure, Major hepatic resection

: , ,

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)

참조

관련 문서

Lee, H.S., et al., Therapeutic efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization as compared with hepatic resection in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with compensated

이는 소아에서 녹농균(pseudomo- nas)이나 수막구균(meningococcus)에 의한 패혈증과 관련이 있다 (Waterhouse-Friderichsen syndrome).. 라) 환자의

Major affective factors such as interest, confidence, attitude, and motivation of an extensive and intensive reading were included.. The survey questionnaire

Reynolds numbers between 2000 and 4000 cover a critical zone between laminar and turbulent flow... Finding Friction Factor

가) 지연 용혈 수혈부작용(delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction, DHTR) 이는 완전히 예방할 수는 없으며 낮은 항체 수치 때문에 동종항체 선별 음성(negative

약물사용의 병력이 없다면 장내기생충 감염에 대한 3회 이상의 분변 검사가 필요하고, 여행, 생식 경력 등을 고려하여 가능성이 높은 기생충에 대한 혈청검사,

쇽 상태의 환자는 집중치료실에서의 치료가 필요하다. 혈압과 맥박 및 호흡수의 연속적인 측 정을 해야 하고, 요량을 측정하기 위해 Foley관을 삽입해야 하며 의식

3) 진단 : 조영제를 이용한 전산화 단층촬영이나 혈관조영술이 진단에 도 움이 되나, 신장기능 정도에 따라서 조영제에 의한 급성신부전이 발생 할 수