• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

± Žô m Ç; c" e8 ý = k Ö  ³ Ž ‘ × Ñ ÷ V Ȱ Ë Ñ „ ÇÊ Ý; c 6 ” X ¢ Ž ì ŏ Œ

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "± Žô m Ç; c" e8 ý = k Ö  ³ Ž ‘ × Ñ ÷ V Ȱ Ë Ñ „ ÇÊ Ý; c 6 ” X ¢ Ž ì ŏ Œ"

Copied!
5
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)



± Žô m Ç; c" e8 ý = k Ö  ³ Ž ‘  × Ñ ÷ V Ȱ Ë Ñ „ ÇÊ Ý; c 6 ” X ¢ Ž ì ŏ Œ

™ »+ ä  6 Ò · ƒ ‘ šA j* å  · ­ ¤ - > - ! H · T + Ö <¦  · . > * > + ä  · L |# Ü a  @

Â

Òí ß –@ /† < Ɠ § Ó ü t o † < Æõ ,  Òí ß – 609-735 (2006¸   3 Z 4 30{ 9  ~ à Î6 £ §)

90

Sr Z … ‚  " é ¶ s   ß ¼w n =`  ¦ : Ÿ x õ   9 µ 1 ÏÒ q tr v   H F g  \  ¦ F g„    7 £ x C  › ' a`  ¦ s 6   x # Œ 8 £ ¤& ñ % i  . s  M

: µ 1 ÏÒ q tô  Ç F g   ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô4 Ÿ ¤  \ " f l “  ô  Ç  כ “  t ,  ß ¼w n =s  ° ú   H $ 3 F g ´ òõ \  _ ô  Ç  כ “  t \  ¦ S X ‰ “  

l  0 AK   ß ¼w n = 4 Ÿ ¤  ^ ‰ü < F g„    7 £ x C  › ' a _  l  † < Æ& h “   ½ ¨› ¸\  ¦    or &  $ 3 F g ´ òõ ü < ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô 4 Ÿ ¤



\  _ K  µ 1 ÏÒ q tô  Ç y Œ •y Œ •_  ’    ñ\  ¦ ì  r o  8 £ ¤& ñ % i  . s  8 £ ¤& ñ X <s ' \  ¦ ì  r$ 3  # Œ  ß ¼w n =\ " f µ 1 ÏÒ q t   H

^

‰E $ ™ ïá Ô 4 Ÿ ¤   $ 3 F g ´ òõ _  €  • 10.227 ± 1.000(stat.) ± 7.855(sys.)C \  s Ø Ô  H   õ \  ¦ % 3 % 3  .

PACS numbers: 41.60.Bq

Keywords: ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô 4 Ÿ ¤  , $ 3 F g ´ òõ ,  ß ¼w n = 4 Ÿ ¤  ^ ‰

I. " e  ] Ø

„   ) a { 9   Ï ã J] X Ò  ¦ n“   B | 9 `  ¦ t ± ú ˜ M : µ 1 ÏÒ q tr v 



 H „   l  _  5 Å q • ¸ (

nc

) , s  B | 9 `  ¦ : Ÿ x õ    H { 9  _  5

Å

q • ¸ (v = βc)˜ Ð   Œ •`  ¦ M :, ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô 4 Ÿ ¤   µ 1 ÏÒ q t   H X

<, s  M : µ 1 ÏÒ q t   H ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô 4 Ÿ ¤    { 9  _  ”  ' Ÿ ~ ½ ӆ ¾ Ó õ

 s À ҍ  H y Œ • (θ

c

) õ  { 9  _  ”  ' Ÿ 5 Å q • ¸ (β)ü < s À ҍ  H › ' a > 



 H d ”  1õ  ° ú   . [1,2]

cosθ

c

= 1

βn (1)

s

 M :, cosθ

c

< 1 s # Q  Ù ¼– Ð, B | 9 _  Ï ã J] X Ò  ¦ \ 



  ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô 4 Ÿ ¤  \  ¦ µ 1 ÏÒ q tr ~  ´ à º e ”   H { 9  _  5 Å q • ¸ (β >

cn1

)  & ñ K t   H X <, # Œ Q B | 9 (n)\ " f_  ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô y

Œ

• (θ

c

) õ  { 9  _  5 Å q • ¸ (β) ° ú   H › ' a >   H Fig. 1 õ  ° ú   .

Fig. 1 \ " f ˜ Ð1 p w s , { 9 & ñ ô  Ç B | 9 \ " f ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô 4 Ÿ ¤  

(

4 R   H y Œ • θ

c

\  ¦ 8 £ ¤& ñ † < ÊÜ ¼– Ð+ ‹ { 9  _  5 Å q • ¸ 8 £ ¤& ñ s 

0 p x ô  ÇX <, z  ´] j& h Ü ¼– Ѝ  H { 9   ”  ' Ÿ  €  " f µ 1 ÏÒ q tr v   H

ƒ

 5 Å q& h “   ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô 4 Ÿ ¤   M :ë  H \  θ

c

_  8 £ ¤& ñ s  6   x s  t 

· ú

§ . : £ ¤& ñ y Œ • θ

c

\  ¦ s À Ò 9 " é ¶ Æ Ò+ þ AÜ ¼– Ð ( 4 R   H ^ ‰E $ ™



ïá Ô 4 Ÿ ¤  \  ¦, & h ] X ô  Ç / B GÒ  ¦ ì ø Í â _  ì ø Í ^ ‰\  ¦ s 6   x # Œ ì ø Í



r v €  , ¨ î ' Ÿ  >  [ þ t # Qš ¸  H 4 Ÿ ¤    / B GÒ  ¦ ì ø Í â _  1/2

÷

&  H t & h \  — ¸# Œ" f ¨ 8 Š  © œ (Ring Image)`  ¦ ë ß –[ þ t >  ÷ &  H X <, s

 " é ¶ o \  ¦ s 6   x ô  Ç  כ s  RICH (Ring Image CHerenkov)

 Ž

Ø  ¦ l s   [3,5].

‘

: r z  ´+ « >z  ´\ " f  H  ß ¼w n = (Plexiglass, CH

2

= C(CH

3

)COOCH

3

, [6]) `  ¦  ҂ à Ìô  Ç F g„    7 £ x C  › ' a \   © œ

E-mail: [email protected]

Fig. 1. The relation between Cherenkov radiation angle(θ

c

) and the velocity(β) of particle in various ra- diators.

{

© œ| ¾ Ó_  ’    ñ  Ž Ø  ¦ ÷ &  H  כ `  ¦ µ 1 Ï| † < ÊÜ ¼– Ð" f,  ß ¼w n = ^ ‰ E $

™ ïá Ô  Ž Ø  ¦ l \  ¦ > hµ 1 Ï l  r  Œ • % i   H X <, s   H  ß ¼w n = _

 8 A# Qè ß – / B N$ í õ  $ § 4 ô  Ç   `  ¦ “ ¦ 9½ + É M :, ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô 4

Ÿ

¤  | ¾ Óë ß – Ø  æì  r y  ´ ú § €  , Õ ª l  † < Æ& h “   ´ òõ \  ¦ F G @ / o

½

+ É Ã º e ” `  ¦  כ Ü ¼– Ð l @ / l  M :ë  H s  .  ß ¼w n =`  ¦ F g„    7

£

x C  › ' a \   ҂ à ÌÙ þ ¡`  ¦ M :ü < s   ß ¼w n =s  \ O `  ¦ M :_  C  â 4 Ÿ ¤



_  s   H Fig. 2 õ  ° ú    [7–10]. Õ ª Q   ß ¼w n =“ É r

›

¸$ í  © œ (CH

2

= C(CH

3

)COOCH

3

) e  ¦  Û ¼w  $ 3 F g ^ ‰ (CH

2

= C

6

H

5

CH) ü < Ä »  l  M :ë  H \ , Ô  ¦í  HÓ ü t \  _ ô  Ç

$ 3

F g ´ òõ • ¸ ° ú “ ¦ e ”  .   " f  ß ¼w n =\ " f µ 1 ÏÒ q t   H $ 3  F

g ´ òõ \  _ ô  Ç 4 Ÿ ¤  ü < ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô ´ òõ \  _ ô  Ç 4 Ÿ ¤   ×  æ # Q Ö

¼ ´ òõ   8¹ ¡ ¤ ¿ º× ¼ Qt   H t  › ¸ K  ^  ¦ € 9 כ ¹ e ”  .

-210-

(2)

Fig. 2. Comparison between the results measured the photomultiplier with and without acryl radiator [7–10].

Table 1. The properties of the used acryl (Plexiglass).

Property Plexiglass

a

(MMA, CH

2

= C(CH

3

)COOCH

3

) Density ρ[g/cm

3

] 1.19

Transmittance τ [%] 92.72 ± 0.79 ± 0.67 Reflex Index n 1.50 ± 0.0033 ± 0.0067

a

with statistical and systematical errors, respectively

II. ÷ m Ç ] M ö U ê s 0 n É

4

Ÿ

¤  ^ ‰– Ð" f  ß ¼w n =`  ¦ : Ÿ x õ    H { 9   µ 1 ÏÒ q tr v   H ’    

ñ $ 3 F g ´ òõ \  _ ô  Ç  כ “  t , ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô 4 Ÿ ¤   ´ òõ \  _  ô

 Ç  כ “  t \  ¦ q “ § l  0 AK  r ×  æ \ " f ½ ¨{ 9 ô  Ç  ß ¼w n =_ 

$ í

| 9 `  ¦ Table 1 \  & ñ o  % i  .

Table 1 _  Ï ã J] X Ò  ¦ õ  È Òõ Ò  ¦“ É r F g7 £ x   7 £ x C  › ' a _  y Œ ™• ¸

 80%s  © œ“    © œ% ò % i  (405 nm ≤ λ ≤ 459 nm)\ 

@

/K  f ” ] X  8 £ ¤& ñ  ) a ° ú כ[ þ t s  . כ Ü ¼– Ð" f, s \  ¦ 0 A # Œ ì  rF g

" é ¶ K $ 3 l (WexTech Systems. Ins, WVASE32) s 6   x

÷

&% 3  . 8 ú x 12  _  8 £ ¤& ñ Ü ¼– РÒ'  : Ÿ x > & h  š ¸  (stat.)\  ¦, 8

£ ¤& ñ [ þ t`  ¦ 0 Aô  Ç  ß ¼w n = / B N õ  [ O u  1 p x \ " f l “  | ¨ c à º e ” 



 H l l š ¸  (sys.)\  ¦ % 3 % 3  .

‘

: r z  ´+ « >“ É r, s   ß ¼w n = 4 Ÿ ¤  ^ ‰\  Z … ‚  " é ¶ (

90

Sr)`  ¦ { 9   r

& , { 9  „    µ 1 ÏÒ q tr v   H $ 3 F g ´ òõ \  _ ô  Ç F g  ü <,

^

‰E $ ™ ïá Ô4 Ÿ ¤  \  _ ô  Ç F g  \  ¦ y Œ •l    É r l  † < Æ& h  ½ ¨› ¸\ 

"

f F g„   7 £ x C  › ' a (Hamamatsu, H6410) Ü ¼– Ð 8 £ ¤& ñ † < Ê`  ¦ : Ÿ x K

 s À Ò# Q& ’  . Z … ‚  " é ¶

90

Sr“ É r β Ô  æ õ \  ¦ : Ÿ x K  þ j@ / 2.28 MeV \  s Ø Ô  H \  -t  (E

e,max

= 2.28M eV, β = 0.98)

Fig. 3. The setting of the geometry to detect (a)only the Scintillation effect.

(b)the Cherenkov radiation and the Scintillation effect.

_

 „   \  ¦  ß ¼w n = 4 Ÿ ¤  ^ ‰\  ~ ½ Ó  >  ÷ &  H X <, ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô 4

Ÿ

¤  _  þ j@ /y Œ • (θ

c

= cos

−1

(

βn1

) = 46.5

)`  ¦ l  † < Æ& h  Ü

¼– Ð s 6   x l  0 AK , U  ´s  12 mm, f ”  â 1 mm_  · ú ˜À Òp ³ o u c

+ t o B js ' \  ¦  6   x % i  . Ø  æì  r ô  Ç ¿ ºa _   ß ¼w n =`  ¦ : Ÿ x õ 

  H „     H Õ ª î  r1 l x \  -t \  ¦ { 9 # Q (

dEdx

∼ 2.242M eV /cm for p

e

∼ 2.22M eV ) [11, 12] β = 0.67 s  | ¨ c M : t  ë

ß – ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô 4 Ÿ ¤  \  ¦ µ 1 ÏÒ q tr †     H  כ õ , $ \  -t _  „  



  ß ¼w n = ? /_  { 9  [ þ t õ  Ø  æ[  t # Œ, t Õ ªF Õ ª î  r1 l x`  ¦ { 9

Ü ¼†     H & h  t  — ¸¿ º “ ¦ 9 # Œ, Fig. 3(a),(b)ü < ° ú  

“

É r z  ´+ « > © œu \  ¦ “ ¦î ß – % i  . 7 £ ¤, l  † < Æ& h Ü ¼– Ð f ” ¹ ¢ ¤€  ^ ‰ (H × W × T = 45 × 45 × 22mm

3

) _   ß ¼w n =_  — ¸

Ž

 H €  `  ¦ F g † < Æ& h Ü ¼– Ð / B N “ ¦, f ”  â 2“  u _  F g„   7 £ x C 

› '

a (Hamamatsu, H6410)`  ¦   ½ + Ër v   H X < e ” # Q" f, Fig.

3(a) _   â Ä º, Z … ‚  s  t    H€  " f ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô 4 Ÿ ¤  

(

4 R   H „  €  “ É r q 0 >¿ º“ ¦, ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô 4 Ÿ ¤   • ¸² ú ˜  t

 · ú §  H  A   Òì  r 7 £ ¤, ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô 4 Ÿ ¤  _  þ j@ /y Œ • 46.5• ¸ s

 © œ_  \ P €  \  F g„   7 £ x C  › ' a`  ¦ ¿ º# Q 1 p x ~ ½ Ó& h Ü ¼– Ð ( 4 R



 H $ 3 F g ´ òõ \ " f µ 1 ÏÒ q t   H F g   ’    ñ\  ¦ ~ à ΍  H ½ ¨› ¸s  .

Fig. 3(b)  H 3(a) ü < ° ú  “ É r ½ ¨› ¸\ " f F g„    7 £ x C  › ' a _  0 A u

\  ¦ Z … ‚  \ " f µ 1 ÏÒ q t   H ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô4 Ÿ ¤  _  ”  ' Ÿ ~ ½ ӆ ¾ Ó_ 

&

ñ €  \  ¿ º# Q ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô 4 Ÿ ¤  ü < $ 3 F g ´ òõ \  _ ô  Ç F g   ’    

ñ\  ¦ — ¸¿ º ~ à Ε ¸2 Ÿ ¤ % i  . s ü < ° ú  s  Fig. 3(a) ($ 3 F g ´ ò õ

\  _ ô  Ç F g   ’    ñ)ü < 3(b) (^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô 4 Ÿ ¤  ü < $ 3 F g ´ ò õ

 Ñ ü t \  _ ô  Ç F g   ’    ñ) \  ¦ q “ § ì  r$ 3 † < ÊÜ ¼– Ð+ ‹ # QÖ ¼ ´ ò õ

  8  H t \  ¦ · ú ˜ è ­ q à º e ”  .

(3)

Fig. 4. The circuit diagram

F

g„    7 £ x C  › ' a \ " f   É r „  l & h  r Õ ªV ,  (t

r

∼ 4 ns, t

f

∼ 10 ns, FWHM ∼ 8 ns) – Ð  Ÿ ÷ ¶ ’    ñ  H, Fig. 4 õ  ° ú  

“ É

r  r– Е ¸\  _ K , ” ¸s Ý ¼\  ¦ ] j ô  Ç  © œI – Ð n t _ O – Ð   7

# Q PCI-CAMAC ! QÛ ¼\  ¦ : Ÿ x K  o ³ n q Û ¼ PC– Ð l 2 Ÿ ¤Ù þ ¡ .

III. ÷ m Ç ] M ö + s Ç Ê Ý

¿

º z  ´+ « >“ É r 1 l qw n & h s l  M :ë  H \  ¿ º z  ´+ « > X <s  \ " f ¿ º

´

òõ , 7 £ ¤ $ 3 F g ´ òõ ü < ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô 4 Ÿ ¤  _  ´ òõ \  ¦ ½ ¨Z >    H

 כ

“ É r # Q§ >  . Ä º‚   y Œ •y Œ •_  z  ´+ « >`  ¦ ì  r$ 3  “ ¦ ¿ º z  ´+ « >Ü ¼– Ð Â

Ò'  ¿ º ´ òõ \  ¦ q “ §K  ˜ Ѐ Œ ¤ .

1. ÷ m Ç] M ö 1 : 9 0ß O Ë Þ Ã Å„ ÆÑ ÷ V Ȱ Ë Ñ Þ Ã Å„ Æ8 ý R w ‹

z 

´+ « >1 (Fig.3 (a))“ É r Z … ‚  s  þ j@ /\  -t  (E

e,max

= 2.28 MeV){ 9  M : µ 1 ÏÒ q t   H ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô 4 Ÿ ¤   þ j@ /y Œ •_   ¾ ú   A

á

¤ \  F g„    7 £ x C  › ' a`  ¦ 0 Au r & , F g„    7 £ x C  › ' a Ü ¼– Ð [ þ t

#

Qš ¸  H ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô 4 Ÿ ¤  _  ´ òõ \  ¦ ] j  % i  . s  M : F g„  



 7 £ x C  › ' a \  8 £ ¤& ñ  ) a ’    ñ  H, Z … ‚  " é ¶`  ¦ ] j Ù þ ¡`  ¦ M :\ 

•

¸ ” > r F    H C  ⠒    ñ (bg1)ü < Z … { 9  _  $ 3 F g ´ òõ \  _

ô  Ç $ 3 F g ’    ñ (sc1)_  ½ + Ë$ í Ü ¼– Ð Ò q ty Œ •½ + É Ã º e ”  . Fig. 5

“

É r, z  ´] j– Ð Z … ‚  " é ¶`  ¦ ] j Ù þ ¡`  ¦ M : 8 £ ¤& ñ  ) a ’    ñ (bg1)ü <

Z

… ‚  " é ¶`  ¦ ¿ º“ ¦ 8 £ ¤& ñ Ù þ ¡`  ¦ M :_  ’    ñ (bg1+sc1)\  ¦ q “ § ô

 Ç Õ ªa Ë >s  .

s

[ þ t ¿ º 8 £ ¤& ñ X <s '   H QDC G V ,  30 Ò'  100 t _  ¸ ú š 6

£ § (Noise) \  @ / # Œ & ñ ½ © o % i   H X <, s  M : ¸ ú š6 £ § s  ì  r Ÿ í

  H QDC G V ,  % ò % i @ / " î S X ‰ t  · ú §Ü ¼Ù ¼– Ð, 30ç ß –  Ü ¼

–

Ð 25 Ò'  35 t     or &  9 & ñ ½ © o\  ¦ à º' Ÿ  # Œ, 8 £ ¤

&

ñ _  r Û ¼% 7 › š ¸ \  ¦ > í ß – % i  .   õ & h Ü ¼– Ð Fig. 5 “ É r Z

… ‚  " é ¶ Ü ¼– РÒ'   š ¸  H $ 3 F g ’    ñ (sc1)\  ¦ Ÿ í† < Êô  Ç X <s  '

 (bg1+sc1)   H, C  ⠒    ñ (bg1) ë ß –_  X <s ' ü < q “ §Ù þ ¡

`

 ¦ M :, 8 £ ¤& ñ ° ú כ_  : Ÿ x > & h  š ¸ ? /\  e ” 6 £ §`  ¦ ˜ Ð# Œï  r  .

Fig. 5. PMT signal distribution measured by the setting 3(a) with (red) and without (black) a beta source (

90

Sr).

Fig. 6. PMT signal distribution measured by the setting 3(b) with (red) and without (black) a beta source (

90

Sr).

2. ÷ m Ç] M ö 2 : 9 0ß O ËÞ Ã Å„ ÆÑ ÷ (V Ȱ Ë ÑÞ Ã Å„ Æ + = k Ö  ³ ŽÞ à Å

„

Æ)8 ý R w ‹

z 

´+ « >2 (Fig. 3(b))  H ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô 4 Ÿ ¤   €  s  — ¸¿ º F g„  



 7 £ x C  › ' a \  [ þ t # Q° ú ˜ à º e ” • ¸2 Ÿ ¤ F g„    7 £ x C  › ' a`  ¦ Z … ‚  

"

é

¶ & ñ €  \  0 Au r (   .   " f, F g„    7 £ x C  › ' a Ü ¼– Ð [ þ t # Q

š

¸  H ’    ñ  H C  ⠒    ñ (bg2)ü < $ 3 F g ’    ñ (sc2) Õ ªo “ ¦ ^ ‰ E $

™ ïá Ô 4 Ÿ ¤  \  _ ô  Ç ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ԓ    ñ (CH) — ¸¿ º Ÿ í† < ʝ ) a



. z  ´+ « >1õ   ð ø Ít – Ð Z … ‚  " é ¶`  ¦ ] j † < ÊÜ ¼– Ð+ ‹ C  â 4

Ÿ

¤  \  _ ô  Ç ’    ñ\  ¦  – Ð 8 £ ¤& ñ % i  . s  z  ´+ « >  õ ü < ¸ ú š 6

£

§  Òì  r (QDC G V ,  30 Ò'  100 t ) `  ¦ & ñ ½ © o # Œ q 

“

§ €   Fig. 6õ  ° ú   .

 

õ & h Ü ¼– Ð Fig. 6“ É r ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô 4 Ÿ ¤  \  _ ô  Ç ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô

’

   ñ (CH)ü < $ 3 F g ’    ñ (sc2)\  ¦ Ÿ í† < Êô  Ç ’    ñ (CH+sc2+

bg2)  C  ⠒    ñ (bg2)ü < ì  r" î ô  Ç s \  ¦   ? /“ ¦ e ” 6 £ §

`

 ¦ ˜ Ð# Œï  r  . t ë ß –, s  M : F g„    7 £ x C  › ' a s  ] X ô  Ç  ß ¼ w n

=_  €  & h s  z  ´+ « >1\ " fü <  Ø Ôl  M :ë  H \ , z  ´+ « >2\ " f 8 £ ¤

&

ñ  ) a $ 3 F g ’    ñ (sc2)  H z  ´+ « >1\ " f_  $ 3 F g ’    ñ (sc1)ü < 

(4)

Table 2. Summary table of the Exp. 1 and 2.

Exp.1 Exp2 counts

a

with a

90

Sr-source bg1+sc1 bg2+sc2+CH

with no source bg1 bg2

a

integrated over the QDC channel [30, 100]

s

\  ¦ ˜ Ðs   H  כ { 9  à º e ”  .   " f, z  ´+ « >1õ  z  ´+ « >2_  q 

“

§ì  r$ 3 `  ¦ III 3 \ " f [ O " î   H  ü < ° ú  s  à º' Ÿ  % i  .

3. ÷ m Ç] M ö1Ê Ý ÷ m Ç] M ö28 ý R w ‹Ä Z ØV Ä : V Ȱ Ë ÑÞ Ã Å„ Æ vs. = k

 Ö

 ³ ŽÞ à ń Æ

0

A_  ¿ º z  ´+ « >`  ¦ q “ § l  0 A # Œ, s \  ¦ ³ ð– Ð & ñ o  €   Table 2 ü < ° ú   . ¿ º z  ´+ « >  õ \ " f, Sr-90 Z … ‚  " é ¶`  ¦ ] j



 “ ¦ 8 £ ¤& ñ ô  Ç bg1õ  bg2 ˜ Ð# ŒÅ ҍ  H s   H, í  H à º >  z 

´+ « >1õ  z  ´+ « >2_  " f– Ð   É r z  ´+ « >› ¸|  (F g„    7 £ x C  › ' a s 



ß ¼w n =\  ] X    H €  & h s   Ø Ô   H › ¸| )\ " fë ß – l “  ô  Ç

 כ

s Ù ¼– Ð, s  ¿ º C  ⠒    ñ_  q  bg2/bg1 \  ¦ ¿ º z  ´+ « >  õ  _

 ˜ Ð& ñ ° ú כÜ ¼– Ð 2 [ % i  . s – РÒ'  z  ´+ « >2\ " f 8 £ ¤& ñ  ) a í  H Ã

ºô  Ç ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô ’    ñ (CH)_   Òì  r`  ¦  6 £ § _  › ' a > d ” õ  ° ú   s

 > í ß –½ + É Ã º e ”  .

CH = (bg2 + sc2 + CH) − bg2

bg1 (bg1 + sc1) (2)

¢

¸ô  Ç d ”  2\ " f % 3 # Q”   ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô ’    ñ (CH) ü < s p  8 £ ¤& ñ

 )

a bg2\  ¦ s 6   x # Œ, z  ´+ « >2\ " f 8 £ ¤& ñ  ) a í  H à ºô  Ç $ 3 F g ’    ñ (sc2)\  ¦ % 3 >   ) a  .

s

 Qô  Ç q “ §ì  r$ 3 `  ¦ : Ÿ x K , z  ´+ « >2\ " f 8 £ ¤& ñ  ) a í  H à ºô  Ç ^ ‰ E $

™ ïá Ô ’    ñ (CH)ü < $ 3 F g ’    ñ (sc2) \  ¦ 1 l x r \  y Û ¼ž ÐÕ ª Ï þ

›Ü ¼– Ð   ? /€   Fig. 7 õ  ° ú   .

IV. + s Ç Â ] Ø

 

õ & h Ü ¼– Ð Fig. 7_  8 £ ¤& ñ   õ – РÒ'  % 3 # Q”   í  H à ºô  Ç

„

 ^ ‰ ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô ’    ñ (CH) ü < $ 3 F g ’    ñ (sc2)_   © œ@ /& h “   q

Ö  ¦“ É r  6 £ § õ  ° ú   .

CH/sc2 = 10.227 ± 1.000(stat.) ± 7.855(sys.) (3) s

   õ ° ú כ_  : Ÿ x > & h  š ¸  (stat.)  H Fig. 6,7 \ " f y Œ • G V ,  {

© œ 8 £ ¤& ñ ° ú כ[ þ t _  : Ÿ x > & h “   š ¸  ( √

count)\  ¦ „   r &  % 3 

#

Q”   ° ú כs  9, r Û ¼% 7 › š ¸  (sys.)  H & ñ ½ © oõ & ñ \ " f ¸ ú š6 £ § s

 ° ú   H QDC G V , `  ¦ ^ ‰> & h Ü ¼– Ð    or &  9 % 3 # Q”  

³

ðï  r¼ #  s  .

Fig. 7. pure Cherenkov radiation signals (black) and scintillation signals(red) extracted from Fig.6 according to Eq.2.

 

 : r& h Ü ¼– Ð, ‘ : r ƒ  ½ ¨”  s   6   x ô  Ç 45 × 45 × 22 mm

3

_   ß ¼w n =\ " f Sr-90Ü ¼– РÒ'  ~ ½ ÓØ  ¦ ) a „    (E

e,max

= 2.28MeV)  µ 1 ÏÒ q tr v   H ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô ’    ñ



 H, „     ß ¼w n = ? /\ " f µ 1 ÏÒ q tr v   H $ 3 F g ’    ñ\  q  K

,  Œ •>   H €  • 2.3C , ß ¼>   H €  • 18C \  ² ú ˜   H  כ ( = 10.227 ± p

stat.

2

+ sys.

2

)`  ¦ · ú ˜Ã º e ”  . s    õ 



 H, $ § 4 ô  Ç   õ  / B N s  6   x s     H „ à Ì Z 4ô  Ç  © œ& h `  ¦ t 



   ß ¼w n =s  ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô 4 Ÿ ¤  ^ ‰– Ð" f Ø  æì  r ô  Ç ´ ò6   x u \  ¦ ° ú 



 H    H  z  ´`  ¦ ˜ Ð# ŒÅ Ò 9, # Œ Q t  l  † < Æ& h “   n  “  

`

 ¦ : Ÿ x ô  Ç ¨ 8 Š  © œ ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô (Ring Image CHerenkov : RICH)

 Ž

Ø  ¦ l _  ] j Œ •0 p x$ í `  ¦ r  ô  Ç  [13].

P

c p 8 ý ò k >

s

  7 Hë  H“ É r  Òí ß –@ /† < Ɠ §  Ä »õ ] j † < ÆÕ ü tƒ  ½ ¨q  (2¸  )\  _

 # Œ ƒ  ½ ¨÷ &% 3 6 £ §.

Y

c p w Š à U Ø ”  ô

[1] W. R. Leo, Techniques for Nuclear and Particle Physics Experiment (Springer-Verlg Berlin Heidel- berg, Germany, 1987), Chap. 2, pp. 33-34.

[2] J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed.

(Hamilton Printing Company, United States of America, 1998), Chap. 13.

[3] K. Kleinknecht, Detectors for Particle Radiation, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 1998), Chap.

5, pp. 148.

(5)

[4] J. D´ıaz, G. Mart´ınez and Y. Schutz, Gamma Ray and Particle Production in Heavy Ion Reactions, (World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., 1998), pp. 521-558.

[5] J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (Hamilton Printing Company, 1998), Chap. 13.

[6] http://esales.lgmma.com:2104/pro_info/p_i_h_02.htm [7] J. -H. Kim et al., Development of an Acryl

Cherenkov Detector and Test Using Cosmic Ray, Bulletin of The Korean Physics Society (Seoul, Ko- rea, April 21-23, 2005), Vol. 1, pp. 303-304.

[8] http://nuri.pusan.ac.kr/ ∼ hipex/bluekjh/Lab/data/

2005_KPS_poster.ppt

[9] K. -U. Choi et al., Development of a mini-RICH De- tector using Acryl, Bulletin of The Korean Physics Society(Deajun, Korea, October 20-22, 2005), Vol.

2, pp. 400.

[10] http://nuri.pusan.ac.kr/ ∼ hipex/bluekjh/Lab/data/

2005_KPS_talk.ppt

[11] R. M. Sternheimer, Phys. Rev. 88, 851 (1952).

[12] D. Marinelli, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 3, 249 (1953).

[13] I. -K, Yoo, Development of a mini-RICH Detector using Acryl, Project Final Report, MOST (Ministry of Science and Technology) (2006).

Study on the Cherenkov Radiation and Scintillation Effect in an Acryl Radiator

Jung-han Kim,

Hye-Young Park, In-Kwon Yoo, Jun-Kyu Yi, Minjeong Jean and Kyung Eon Choi Department of Physics, Pusan National University, Pusan 609-735

(Received 30 March 2006)

Using a beta-source,

90

Sr, photon signals produced in an acryl-radiator were measured. We measured the scintillation effect and the Cherenkov radiation effect by varying the geometrical setting of the experiments. From a comparison of the two effects, we obtained a Cherenkov radiation signals that was 10.227±1.000(stat.)±7.855(sys.) times higher than the scintillation signals.

PACS numbers: 41.60.Bq

Keywords: Chrenkov radiation, Scintillation, Acryl radiator

E-mail: [email protected]

수치

Fig. 1 \ &#34; f ˜ Ð1 p w s , { 9 &amp; ñ ô  Ç B | 9 \ &#34; f ^ ‰E $ ™ ïá Ô 4 Ÿ ¤  
Fig. 2. Comparison between the results measured the photomultiplier with and without acryl radiator [7–10].
Fig. 4. The circuit diagram F  g„   7£x C ›'a \ &#34; f  Ér „ l &amp;h  r Õ ªV,  (t r ∼ 4 ns, t f ∼ 10 ns, FWHM ∼ 8 ns) – Ð  Ÿ÷¶ ’   ñ H, Fig
Fig. 7. pure Cherenkov radiation signals (black) and scintillation signals(red) extracted from Fig.6 according to Eq.2.

참조

관련 문서

Data containing muons are classified into 3 categories because when cosmic muons cross the detector, neutrons are created.. Firstly, neutrons are captured by hydrogen and release

The experimental results demonstrated that the plastic optical fiber could be applied as an alternative to a conventional light source for liquid crystal displays by adjusting

Measurement of water transparency is required in the case of a large water Cherenkov detector because the transparency of water is directly related to the number of photons that

In this study, visually-impaired students’ abilities for observation were evaluated and analysed in physics experi- ment tasks using the auditory sense, including making

In pursuit of inquiry-based physics education, detailed improvement are suggested in five areas: content, material, manual, teaching method, and assessment of experiment. On the

Our loss measurement system, with a standard detector, the tunable LD sources, and the polarization controller, has shown a good measurement uncertainty within 0.015 dB in the

Resonant and non-resonant Raman scatter- ing spectra from 3 ML-thick CdSe/ZnSe self-assembled quantum dot structure excited at energies of 2.21 eV and 2.54 eV from top to

We discuss the potential space formalism of general scala–vector–tensor theories in a stationary space–time and completely classify the Killing symmetries of the potential spaces in