• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

The Study on Au Losses in the Glassy Slag During the Lead-fire Assay

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "The Study on Au Losses in the Glassy Slag During the Lead-fire Assay"

Copied!
9
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

Vol. 49, No. 5 O2012PG pp. 654-662

ٓਏׁ࣑઩ছକࠤாਉ޹ֻߦৃਓܣۀHPME෌߆ր

ৃਓ଀଴઩۩෉઴֜

୺Գ็



 ׌ࣲச



 ଍۩૽



 ૈਆ஺



 ౖ਎ฅ



 নָવ



 ًౖశ



 ࢮవઽ



The Study on Au Losses in the Glassy Slag During the Lead-fire Assay

Kang-Hee Cho, Bong-Ju Kim, Dae-Woong Wi, Su-Ji Oh, Seoung-Hwan Choi, Kyu-Youl Sung, Nag-Choul Choi and Cheon-Young Park

Abstract : In order to investigate the reason for gold losses in the lead-fire assay, the salt, galena, lead, and quartz were observed from the results of XRD analysis for the glassy slag from the flux mixture process. In the lead-fire assay, the gold losses were determined to be 20.98% in the slag of the rock, while the gold losses were 12.55% in the slag of the concentrate. The reason for the gold losses in the slag was explained that it may not be effectively decomposed from the quartz and precipitated by the lead in the lead-fire assay process.

The borax was suggested to be more effective in reducing gold losses in the concentrate than in the rock.

Key words : Gold losing, Lead-fire assay, Glassy slag, Flux mixture

څ أ: Ǭ-֨ŚѪقԴ֢͒ŔͿ՜֬ʼəŚ՜֬ڙۍںőϼॠČۙॠٕɰ. ؒԵę܁ġقʂॠيڵ܃ঔ० ڷͿ֨ŚѪںսॱॠČŔ֢͒ŔقʂॠيXRDқԵॢĀęѓٍԵ, ՙŚ, ǬфԵٖۋě޶ʼؽɰ. ֨ŚѪں

սॱॢĀę, ؒԵۆ֢͒ŔقԴŚ՜֬ۋथŒ19.86 %ۍъϸق܁ġۆ֢͒ŔقԴəथŒ12.55 %ۋٕɰ.

֢͒ŔقԴŚۋ՜֬ʼəڙۍڹ֨Śę܁قԴԵٖۋমęۺڷͿڵ३ʼݓЇॠٕş˺ЛقŔνČǬۋ

মęۺڷͿࠞۻʼݓЇ॰ş˺ЛقێرǦìڷͿԐΒʽɰ. ֨ŚѪقԴؒԵ҃ɰ܁ġقԴŚ՜֬ںܶۋə ʚңԐÀমęۺےںঝۍॠٕɰ.

ܳڅر: Ś՜֬, Ǭ-֨ŚѪ, ڮνݗ֢͒Ŕ, ڵ܃ঔ०

2012ț6ښ26ێۿս, 2012ț8ښ21ێ֮ԐٰΒ 2012ț10ښ18ێóۦঝ܁

1) ܓԸʂॡİقȃݓۙڙėॡę

2) ʴҙæԺ(ܳ) ۙڙԐغҙ

3) ۻǫʂॡİėغşցٍĵՙ

*Corresponding Author(чߎٖ) E-mail; [email protected]

Address; Department of Energy and Resource Engineering, Chosun University, Kwang-ju, Korea

Դ΁

࣯॔͒ɔŔΝڙՙ(PGE)قə࣯॔͒ɔ(Pt), ࣻ͆˘(Pd), Ϳ˘(Rh), Θࢬɔ(Ru), ۋν˘(Ir), ١֟в(Os)ˣۋ؎Ͳ

܋ەČۋ˞࣯॔͒ɔŔΝڙՙٮŚ(Au)ںŊŚ՚Ϊ (precious metals)ͿқΪॢɰ. ؒԵ, ġԵф܁ġ֨Βق

࣯॔͒ɔŔΝڙՙٮŚۋŕй͟ڷͿܕۦॠş˺Лق

ۋ˞Ś՚ںқνॠäǣধսॠşڦ३ԴəϤ۹қν (separation)-Ȭ߹(concentration)֨ࡈآ ॢɰ. Ǭ-֨ŚѪ

(lead-fire assay, Pb-FA)ę ɦࡃ-֨ŚѪ(nickel sulfide fire assay, NiS-FA)ۋ١͒ۻҙࢢ࣯॔͒ɔŔΝڙՙٮ

Śںқν-Ȭ߹ॠəʚۋڌʼرٵɰ(Barefoot and van Loon, 1999; Rao and Reddi, 2000; Juvonen et al., 2004). Ǭ-֨ŚѪڹ࣯॔͒ɔŔΝڙՙۍ࣯॔͒ɔ, ࣻ

͆˘, Ϳ˘ęŚںܳͿқν-Ȭ߹ॠəʚۋڌʼČɦࡃ-

֨ŚѪڹʂҙқۆ࣯॔͒ɔŔΝڙՙεқν-Ȭ߹ॠə ʚ ۋڌʽɰ. Ǭ-֨ŚѪڹ қϊ֨Β, ԓজǬ(litharge,

©ƀ¨),ՙɰধ(soda ash, sodium carbonate, §ſϜ¨Ð),ң Ԑ(borax, sodium tetraborate, §ſϛѨÔ), őԐ(silica,

¬Ƈ¨Ï), нÀΘ(flour, œ×)ˣںʪÀɦ(fire-clay crucible) ق ȏČ ڌڵ֨ࢇɰ. ԓজǬ(©ƀÏ â¨Ï à)ۋ ڌڵʼر Ǭ (©ƀ×)ڷͿঞڙʼϸԴ࣯॔͒ɔŔΝڙՙٮŚںपݚॠ يʪÀɦцɱڷͿࠞۻ֨ࢇɰ(Potts, 1987). ŊŚ՚˞

ۋपݚʽǬ०ŚںǬ߸(lead button)ۋ͆ॢɰ. őԓ

ّġНęCu, Pb, Zn ˣęÏڹŚ՚˞ڹڌڵʼرڮν

ٍĵȦЛ

(2)

Table 1. The mixtures of fusion flux for the lead-fire assay (units; g) classification

of sample

mixture of fusion flux (slag name)

powdered sample

litharge (©ƀ¨)

soda ash (§ſϜ¨Ð)

borax (§ſϛШÔ)

flour (C)

silver nitrate (šƅ§¨Ð) (mg)

rock

mixture 1 (SMC-1) 30 35 55 10 20

mixture 2 (SMC-8) 30 40 55 10 20

mixture 3 (SMC-15) 30 35 55 10 10 20

mixture 4 (SMC-22) 30 40 55 10 10 20

concentrate

mixture 1 (SMC-29) 10 35 55 10 5

mixture 2 (SMC-36) 10 40 55 10 5

mixture 3 (SMC-43) 10 35 55 10 10 5

mixture 4 (SMC-50) 10 40 55 10 10 5

ݗ֢͒Ŕ(slag)ͿқνʼرʪÀɦڦͿ̴ɰ. ۋ˺ي

͠ÀݓڅۍقۆॠيŚۋǬ߸ͿपݚʼݓЇॠČ֢

͒ŔͿ ڮۓʽɰ.

Ǭ-֨ŚѪڹŕй͟ۆŚ॥͟ںĀ܁ॠəʚठνॠó

Ԑڌʼرٵڷǣ, ψڹتۆڵ܃(fusion flux)ÀԐڌʼ ş˺Лق١޲ÀьԦॣսەɰ. ̚ॢي͠Àݓڅۍ قۆॠيŚۋ֨Śę܁قԴ՜֬ʽɰ(van Loon, 1977;

Baker, 1985; Juvonen and Vaananen, 1993; Balcerzak, 2002; Suominen et al., 2004; Turan and Yucel, 2011).

Ǭ߸À঍Ձʼəę܁قԴŚۋ֢͒ŔͿأ2% ՜֬ʼ Č, ࡺचͪۋՎ(cupellation) ę܁قԴ أ 1%À ՜֬ʽ ɰ(Baker, 1985). ডজġНۋমęۺڷͿڌڵʼݓ؍

؉Ś՜֬ۋߣ͒ʼşʪॠ϶(van Loon, 1977; Potts, 1987), ̚ॢ őԓّġНۋ ȃИ ۺر ݓǣࠚ ۾ՁڷͿ

ۍॠيŚ՜֬ۋьԦॢɰ(Potts, 1987). ̚ॢۍࡺͪۋ Վ(inquaration)ڷͿ ۍॠي Ś ՜֬ۋ ێرǦɰ(Turan and Yucel, 2011).

֨Śę܁قԴێرǣəŚ՜֬ں߯ՙজॠşڦ३Դ

ڵ܃ܓ०ęڌڵ֨Âں߯ۺজॠيآॢɰ(Bedard and Barnes, 2004). Śڹ ডߏԵ, ڮҼߏԵ ф ۙΪߏԵę

ÏڹডজġНقওڹԵٖęÏڹőԓّġНقսъ ʽɰ. ۋ˞ġН˞ۋমęۺڷͿڌڵʼşڦ३Դəࠜ

ͪߣԵ(niter, ¤§¨Ð), ՙɰধ ңԐ ˣ, ̚əÞ§ſ©¨ÐßƖ,

¥ƇϛѨÔ, ¤¡œÑ¡Ñ¨Ó, ¤Ïœ¨Ðˣں ߐÀॢɰ(Bedard and Barnes, 2004; Juvonen et al., 2004; Suominen et al., 2004). ŔνČǬ߸ͿŚۋ۞पݚʼرࠞۻʾսەʪ΀

ڌڵߕۆ۾Ձں঍Ե(œſŸÏ)ۋǣԵٖ(silica, ¬Ƈ¨Ï)ڷͿ

ܓۼ३آॢɰ(Rao and Reddi, 2000; Mcintosh, 2006),

˰͆ԴٍĵЀۺڹŚۋ֨Śę܁قԴڮνݗ֢͒

ŔͿ՜֬ʼəڙۍںࣷ؊ॠČۙॠٕɰ. ɰتॢ॥͟

ҼͿڵ܃εঔ०ܓ܃ॠي֨ŚѪںսॱॠٕČ֢͒Ŕ

Ϳ՜֬ʼəŚ॥͟ں܁͟জॠٕČŚ՜ٖ֬ॳۍۙ

ε Č޶ॠČۙ ॠٕɰ.

֨Β ֬ॹѓѪфқԵѓѪ

֨ŚѪقԐڌॢ֨ΒəʂڍܓԸ३تSMCۆؒԵę

܁ġۋɰ. ؒԵ֨Βə Ͽۋԓۆ ॥ŚԵٖϕ(-82 ͪѧ) ں޽ࠄॢìۋČ, ۋġϕۆডজġНںҙڮԸѻॢì ۋ܁ġ֨Βۋɰ. ۋ˞֨Βə200 mesh ۋॠͿ؉óۋ࣡

Ѓ࢐ͿйқթॠČ48֨Â105Gæܓş(dry oven)قԴ

æܓॠٕɰ. ۋ˞֨Β˞ڹ ÁÁ ڵ܃ঔ०Н(Table 1) ę ॥ƍ Ҽɩҋݓق ȏČ ۞ ঔ०ॠٕɰ(Johnson and Maxwell, 1981).

֬ॹѓѪ

֨Βٮ ڵ܃ঔ०Н(Table 1)ں ʪÀɦ(ȭۋ 13 cm, ٽą9.5 cm, Ǵą8 cm, ߕۺ70.81 cm3)قȏČݗԓڹ (šƅ§¨Ð)ڌؚ20 mgںߐÀॠٕɰ(Juvonen and Kontas, 1999). ֨Β शϸں ՙŚڷͿ ʪपॠي ֨Ś ę܁قԴ

ڌڵߕÀҼԓʼəìںѓݓॠٕɰ. ڌڵߕÀҼԓʼ əڙۍڹՙɰধÀڌڵʼرœ¨Ï À֟ÀьԦʼČŔ νČнÀΘÀԓজʾ˺œ¨Ï À֟ÀьԦʽɰ. œ¨ÏÀ

۾Ձۆ ڌڵߕε ࢐߻ॣ ˺ ڌڵߕÀ Ҽԓ ՜֬ʽɰ (McIntosh et al., 2006). ֨Βٮڵ܃ঔ०Нۋ˞رەə

ʪÀɦεۻşʪÀɦق(muffle furnace) ȏČėşεė śॠϸԴ940قԴ40қÂÀَॠٕɰ. Ŕ͢ɰڼė şε޲ɳॢԜࢗͿ1150Ϳ1֨Âʴ؋ݓ՚֨ࡎɰ.

ۋ˺ڌڵ٣ʪəͪۋ܋٣ʪć(DS2-2000)Ϳࠑ܁ॠٕ

ɰ. ڌڵߕεiron moldقҢČǼÁ֨ࡎɰ. ǼÁʽڌڵ ߕε७ϢͿ˃˚Ͳڮνݗ֢͒ŔٮǬ߸Ϳқνॠٕ

(3)

Table 2. Analytical result of the glassy slag by EDS analysis

slag name elements weight % atomic%

SMC-15

O 47.48 61.13

Na 18.27 16.36

Al 5.32 4.06

Si 18.52 13.58

S 2.56 1.64

Cl 1.55 0.90

Fe 6.31 2.33

Total 100.00

SMC-29

C 5.35 8.47

O 51.03 60.70

Na 17.88 14.80

Al 4.21 2.97

Si 15.31 10.38

S 1.47 0.87

Cl 0.98 0.52

Fe 3.77 1.29

Total 100.00

Fig. 1. Photomicrograps of ore mineral from the rock sample (Ch; chalcopyrite, Ga; galena, Py; pyrite, Q;

quartz).

ɰ. Ǭ߸εࡺच-ʪÀɦ(bone ash crusible, ȭۋ3 cm, ٽą4 cm, Ǵą3 cm, ߕۺ6.75 cm3)قȏČ940ق Դ40қÂÀَॠيǬںԓজ֨ࡈ܃äॠٕɰ. ࡺच- ʪÀɦцɱقǫڹڹ߸(silver bead)εধսॠيИó εۦČ, heating blockقԴ20% ݗԓ15 mlεÀॠي

150Ϳ 30қÂ ڌ३֨ࡈ ڹں ܃äॠٕɰ. ۛڮНق

प॥ʼر ەə ڹ ф ҝտНں ܃äॠş ڦॠي ɰ֨

850قԴ5қʴ؋Àَॠٕɰ. տսॢŚںধսॠي

ुڦεćԓॠٕɰ. ̚ॢ֢͒ŔͿۆŚ՜֬ڙۍںࣷ

؊ॠşڦॠي, ֢͒Ŕقʂॠي2ÀݓѓѪڷͿŚ॥

͟ںࠑ܁ॠٕɰ. қνʽ֢͒Ŕεٶսқ३ॠيڙۙড় ġқԵş(AAS)Ϳ gold ॥͟ں ࠑ܁ॠٕČ, ֢͒Ŕε

Table 1ۆڵ܃ٮঔ०ॠيɰ֨֨ŚѪںսॱॠيŚ

॥͟ںĀ܁ॠٕɰ(Table 2). ŔνČ֢͒Ŕقप॥ʼر

ەəġНںঝۍॠşڦॠيٍυठں܃ۚॠيठġই йąę SEM ě޶ں սॱॠٕɰ.

қԵѓѪ

200 mesh ۋॠۆæܓʽġԵф܁ġŔνČ֨ŚѪ قԴԦՁʽ֢͒ŔεÁÁ0.75 g؂ԐқѪڷͿ޽ࠄॠ

ٕɰ. ٍۙŚ(native gold)ڹٍՁ࣢ՁęҼܼڷͿۍॠ

يflake gold effect фnugget effectÀьԦॣսەɰ (Juvonen and Vaananen, 1993; Allan and Woodcock, 2001). ۋͿۍॠي֨Β޽ࠄę܁قԴ١޲ÀьԦॣս ەɰ(Liipo, 2003) ۋ˞֨ΒəٶսεԐڌॠيheating block(model; DMB-2, 24 hole)قԴ70قԴ1֨Âʴ

؋ қ३ॠٕɰ. 20ѕͿ ৠԵʽ ڌؚ֨Βε ڙۙড়ġқ Եş(atomic absorption spectrophotometry, AAS, AA- 7000, Shimadzu, Japan)قԴAu, Ag, Pb, Fe ॥͟ںࠑ

܁ॠٕɰ. 200 mesh қϊ֨ΒəXRD(X-ray diffraction, Rigaku, Geigerflex D/max rA)қԵॠٕɰ. қԵܓæڹ

Cu-K쩀GԸںۋڌॠيÀ՚ۻؓ40 kV, ۻΪ30 mA, ܳ Ԑ՚ʪ 2°/min.ڷͿ 3°70°ۆ 2쩇G ĵÂں қԵॠٕɰ.

ĀęфČ޶

ġНॡۺқԵĀę

ؒԵ֨Βقप॥ʽġԵġНۆܛΪεঝۍॠşڦॠ يٍυठں܃ۚॠيठġইйąڷͿě޶ॢĀęԵ

ٖ, ডߏԵ, ѓٍԵ, ডʴԵۋě޶ʼؽɰ(Fig. 1). ডߏ ԵęডʴԵڹʫςۺڷͿԵٖقप॥ʼؽɰ. ѓٍԵڹ

(4)

Fig. 2. The XRD patterns for rock and concentrate (G;

galena, P; pyrite, Q; quartz).

Fig. 3. The XRD patterns of glassy slag from the lead-fire assay with rock (G; galena, H; halite, Q; quartz).

Fig. 4. The XRD patterns of glassy slag from the lead-fire assay with concentrate (G; galena, H; halite, L: lead, Q;

quartz).

ডߏԵقսъʼ϶, ٍۙŚ(native gold)əě޶ʼݓ؍

ؕɰ. ٍĵݓًۆŚġԓڹߎَսقۆॠيڿধؒࠗۋ

őজ фþڏϿ Ѻݗۚڌں ыؕɰ(ۋَ֧ ˣ, 2009).

ؒԵę܁ġقʂॠيÁÁXRDқԵॢĀęԵٖ, ড ߏԵŔνČԵٖ, ডߏԵ, ѓٍԵۋě޶ʼؽɰ(Fig. 2).

܁ġڹ ҙڮԸѻ(flotation)ѪڷͿ ডজġНę ϕԵġН

ںԸѻॢìۋɰ. ܁ġقԴԵٖۋě޶ʼəڙۍڹҙ ڮԸѻقԴমęۺڷͿԵٖںز܃֨ࢅݓЇ॰ş˺Л ۋɰ. ؒԵę܁ġق॥ڮʽŚ॥͟ںĀ܁ॠşڦॠي

4Àݓڵ܃ঔ०(Table 1)ڷͿ֨ŚѪںÁÁ7ধ؂սॱ ॠٕɰ. ŔĀęəTable 2ق܁νॠٕČ, ʂशۺۍ֢͒

Ŕق ʂॢ XRD қԵ ۙΒə Fig. 3(ؒԵۆ ֢͒Ŕ)ٮ

Fig. 4(܁ġۆ ֢͒Ŕ)ق ܁νॠٕɰ.

ѓٍԵ, ՙŚ(halite) ф Եٖق ३ɾʼə ধۼԸ˞ۋ

ؒԵۆ֢͒ŔقԴě޶ʼؽɰ(Fig. 3). 2.95ڹѓٍԵ ق, 2.82ę1.99ڹՙŚقŔνČ3.34ڹԵٖق

३ɾʼəধۼԸڷͿԐΒʽɰ. ֢͒ŔقԴѓٍԵق३ ɾʼəXRD ধۼԸۋǣࢍǣəڙۍڹؒԵқϊ֨Βق

ѓٍԵۋप॥ʼؽş˺Лۋäǣ(Fig. 2) ওڹ֨Śę

܁قԴѓٍԵۋԞͿԦՁʼؽş˺ЛێìڷͿ߸܁ʽ ɰ. ۻۙəؒԵқϊ֨Βقप॥ʼرەʏѓٍԵۋأ

1150ۆČ٣ʪقԴڵ३ʼݓ؍ؕɰəۆйÀʽɰ.

Ŕ͠ǣѓٍԵۆڌڵ۾ۋ327ۍ۾ںČͲॠϸ, ֨ Śę܁قԴѓٍԵۋڵ३ʼݓ؍ؕɰəìڹ३Եॠş

رͲڏҙқۋɰ. ٷǽॠϸڌڵ۾ںǰ߸رܳəՙɰ ধεߐÀॠٕş˺Лۋɰ. ঳ۙۆąڍ, ֨Śę܁قԴ

ԓজǬ(©ƀ¨)ۋ нÀΘ(C)ق ۆॠي Ǭ(©ƀ)ڷͿ ঞڙʼ ČডজġНͿҙࢢѓ߻ʽSÀԴͿĀ०ॠيѓٍԵۋ

(5)

Fig. 5. SEM image of glassy slag surface (a; SMC-15, b; SMC-29).

঍ՁʽìڷͿ३Եʽɰ. ۋٮÏڹ߸܁ڹ֢͒ŔقČ

॥͟ۆǬۋࠑ܁ʼؽş˺Лۋɰ(Table 5ۆPb ॥͟).

ՙŚق३ɾʼəধۼԸۋ֢͒ŔقԴǣࢍəڙۍڹ֨

Śę܁قԴڌڵߕۆҼԓںѓݓॠşڦॠيߐÀॢ

ՙŚ˺Лۋɰ. ڵ܃(flux)ͿߐÀॢՙɰধÀ֨Śę܁

قԴڵ३ʼϸԴœ¨ÏÀьԦॠČ̚ॢঞڙ܃ͿߐÀॢ

нÀΘÀ ԓজʼϸԴœ¨Ïε ьԦ֨ࢇɰ. ۋ˺ ьԦʽ

œ¨ÏÀ۾Ձۋȭڹڌڵߕε࢐߻ॠϸԴڌڵߕÀҼԓ

՜֬ʽɰ(McIntosh et al., 2006). ֢͒ŔقԴԵٖۆধ ۼԸۋě޶ʼəìڹ॥ŚԵٖϕۆԵٖۋ֨Śę܁ق Դ ڵ३ʼݓ ؍ؕş˺Лۋɰ.

܁ġۆ֢͒ŔقʂॠيXRDқԵں֬֨ॢĀęѓ

ٍԵ, ՙŚ, Եٖ, Ǭ(lead)ق३ɾʼəধۼԸ˞ۋě޶

ʼؽɰ(Fig. 4). ܁ġۆ֢͒ŔقԴԵٖۆধۼԸۋě

޶ʼəڙۍڹ֨Śę܁قԴԵٖۋڵ३ʼݓЇ॰ڼں

ۆйॢɰ. Śڹ॥ŚԵٖϕۆডߏԵ, ڮҼߏԵقսъ ʼşʪॠݓχԵٖ՚قɳʫڷͿսъʼşʪॢɰ(ڮ ҋߏˣ, 2010). ۋͿۍॠيԵٖق॥ڮʼرەʏŚۋ

֢͒ŔͿ՜֬ʼČەəìڷͿࣺɳʽɰ. ۋìڹڵ܃

ۆԸ࢘ۋǣڵ܃ߐÀ͟ۆҙܔ, ڵ܃Œ঍ۋϑݓ؍ؕ

ş˺Лێսʪەɰ. ێъۺڷͿ֨ŚѪقԴőԓّġ Нںڵ३֨ࢅşڦॠيՙɰধǣңԐۋٽقɰتॢ

ܛΪۆڵ܃εߐÀॢɰ(Potts, 1987; Bugbee, 1949). ֢

͒ŔقԴǬق३ɾʼəধۼԸۋǣࢍǦڙۍڹԓজǬ ۋǬڷͿঞڙʼϸԴǬ߸ͿࠞۻʼݓЇ॰ş˺Лۋ ɰ. Ǭڹ25قԴнʪÀ10.7 g/cm3ۋݓχ1200ۆ

ȭڹ ٣ʪقԴə 9.5 g/cm3ڷͿ Çՙʽɰ(McIntosh et al., 2006). ǬۋڌڵʼرнʪÀÇՙʼϸ۾ՁۋÌॢ

ڌڵߕͿۍॠيǬ߸ͿǬۋࠞۻॠݓЇॣսʪەɰ.

ۋəڌڵʽǬۋŚںपݚॠيǬ߸Ϳࠞۻ֨ࢅݓЇ

॰ڼںۆйॢɰ. ۋͿۍॠيŚۋ֢͒ŔͿ՜֬ʾì ڷͿ ԐΒʽɰ. ֨ŚѪقԴ, Ǭ(Ҽܼ=11.36)ۆ ًॣڹ

Ҽܼۋ19.3ۍŚںपݚॠيǬ߸Ϳࠞۻ֨ࢅəìۋɰ (Potts, 1987).

֢͒Ŕۆशϸ࣢Ձ

֨ŚѪڷͿҙࢢԦՁʽ֢͒ŔقѓٍԵ, Եٖ, ՙŚ, ǬˣۆXRD ধۼԸۋě޶ʼؽɰ. XRDқԵۆê߻ॢ

ćə5wt.% ۋԜۍʚ(Guerra and Dreisinger, 1999), ֢

͒Ŕقۋ˞ġНۋप॥ʼرەںìڷͿٚԜʼرٍ

υठں܃ۚॠي֢͒ŔۆशϸںठġইйąġęSEM ě޶ॠٕɰ. ठġъԐইйąقԴۋ˞ġНقʂॢ̤͸

ॢ঍ࢗεě޶ॣսػؽɰ. Fig. 5aəѓٍԵęՙŚ

ˣۆধۼԸۋě޶ʼؽʏ֢͒Ŕ(Fig. 3, SMC-15) श ϸۋɰ. SEMقԴѓٍԵۋǣՙŚڷͿࣺɳʼəĀ܁

঍ࢗəঝۍॣսػؽɰ. Ŕ͠ǣEDSқԵ(Table 2)ق ԴNa, Al, Si, S, Cl, Fe ˣۋê߻ʼəìڷͿ҃؉ՙ Śۋप॥ʼرەڼںݓ֨३ܵɰ. Fig. 5bəԵٖ, ѓٍ

Ե, ՙŚ, ǬۆধۼԸۋě޶ʽ܁ġۆ֢͒Ŕ(SMC-29) ۋɰ. ً֨SEMقԴۋ˞ġНق३ɾʼə঍ࢗəě޶

ॣսػؽڷǣEDSқԵ(Table 2)قԴC, Na, Si, S, Cl, Fe ˣۋê߻ʼؽɰ. ۋ˞ڙՙܼNaٮCl ŔνČCÀ

ê߻ʼəڙۍڹڌڵߕۆҼԓںѓݓॠşڦ३ߐÀॢ

ՙŚ, ঞڙ܃ͿߐÀॢнÀΘقۆॢٖॳڷͿԦÁʽ ɰ. ѓٍԵę Ǭق ʂॢ XRD ধۼԸڹ ě޶ʼؽݓχ

EDSқԵقԴPbÀê߻ʼݓ؍ؕɰ. ۋəXRDۆê߻

ॢćÀ أ 5wt%ۋş ˺ЛڷͿ ԐΒʽɰ(Guerra and Dreisinger, 1999). ۋ˞֢͒ŔقʂॢAAS қԵقԴ

Č Ȭʪۆ PbÀ ࠑ܁ʼؽɰ(Table 5).

ؒԵф܁ġقʂॢ֨ŚѪĀę

ؒԵф܁ġقʂॠي4Àݓڵ܃ঔ०ڷͿ֨ŚѪں

սॱॠيŚ॥͟ںĀ܁ॠٕɰ(Table 3). ۋ֨Śę܁

(6)

Table 3. The contents of gold for rock, concentrate and slag by lead-fire assay analysis (7 repeats) (unite; g/ton) classification of sample mixture of fusion flux

(slag name) mean Std. D. slag

(mean)a Std. D.

rock

mixture 1 (SMC-1) 10.86 0.33 0.09 0.06

mixture 2 (SMC-8) 10.86 0.29 0.06 0.02

mixture 3 (SMC-15) 10.72 0.21 0.05 0.01

mixture 4 (SMC-22) 10.86 0.77 0.04 0.02

concentrate

mixture 1 (SMC-29) 148.29 2.37 0.06 0.02

mixture 2 (SMC-36) 149.37 1.90 0.05 0.01

mixture 3 (SMC-43) 149.04 0.64 0.04 0.001

mixture 4 (SMC-50) 149.51 0.70 0.04 0.01

St. D.; standard deviation, a; recuperated on a slag from the rock and the concentrate

Table 4. The chemical composition of rocks and concentrates by AAS analysis (7 repeats) units (Au and Ag; g/ton, Pb ~ Fe; mg/kg)

Au (St. D.)

Ag (St. D.)

Pb (St. D.)

Fe (St. D.) rock 26.34

(1.28)

42.03 (1.26)

528.43 (0.34)

43.20 (0.06) concentrate 143.44

(3.18)

103.51 (1.12)

523.51 (1.79)

599.61 (1.47) St. D.; standard deviation

قԴԦՁʽ֢͒Ŕε޽ࠄॠيʴێॢڵ܃ঔ०ڷͿɰ

֨֨ŚѪںսॱॠيŚ॥͟ںĀ܁ॠٕɰ(Table 3ق Դ slag).

ؒԵقʂॠي, ֨ŚѪںսॱॢĀęŚथŒ10.86 g/

tonںصؽɰ. Ŕ͠ǣ֢͒Ŕεɰ֨֨ŚѪںսॱॢą ڍ, ԓজǬ(35 g)ęՙɰধ(55 g)εঔ०(ۋॠş҆ڵ܃

ঔ०)ॢ֢͒Ŕ, ş҆ڵ܃ঔ०قԓজǬ(5 g)ں߸Àॢ

֢͒Ŕ, ş҆ڵ܃ঔ०قңԐ(10 g)ں߸Àॢ֢͒ŔŔ νČş҆ڵ܃ঔ०قԓজǬ(5 g)ęңԐ(10 g)εঔ०

ॢ֢͒ŔقԴŚथŒ॥͟ۋÁÁ0.09 g/ton, 0.06 g/

ton, 0.05 g/ton, 0.04 g/tonͿǣࢍǮɰ. ݌ş҆ڵ܃ঔ० ڷͿ֨ŚѪںսॱॠəąڍÀۤψڹŚۋ֢͒ŔͿ

՜֬ʼؽČ, ş҆ڵ܃ঔ०قԓজǬęңԐεʌ߸Àॢ

֢͒ŔقԴÀۤۺڹŚ՜֬ۋێرǮɰ. ۋٮÏڹĀ ęəŚۋʌমęۺڷͿǬقपݚʼرǬ߸Ϳࠞۻʼ şڦ३ԴəʌψڹԓজǬۋज़څॠɰəìںۆйॢ

ɰ. ŔνČңԐεʌ߸Àॠي֨ŚѪںսॱॠϸőԓ

ّġНۋʌমęۺڷͿڵ३ʼرŚ՜֬ںܶێսە ڼں ݓ֨३ܵɰ.

܁ġۆąڍ, ş҆ڵ܃ঔ०ڷͿ֨ŚѪںսॱॢąڍ, Ś थŒ ॥͟ۋ 148.29 g/tonۋؽݓχ şܕڵ܃ঔ०ق

ɳݓԓজǬ5 gں߸Àॠۙ, ŚथŒ॥͟ۋ149.37 g/

tonͿݒÀॠٕɰ. ݌, थŒ1.08 g/tonۆŚںʌধսॢ

ìۋɰ. ܁ġۆ֢͒Ŕεɰ֨֨ŚѪںսॱ॰ں˺, ş

҆ڵ܃ঔ०قԴŚथŒڹ0.067 g/tonںصؽݓχş҆

ڵ܃ঔ०ق5 gۆԓজǬں߸Àॢ֢͒ŔقԴəgold थŒ0.050 g/tonںصؽɰ. ݌ԓজǬ5 gں߸Àॠϸ

֢͒ŔقԴʪŚ՜֬ںܶێսەڼںঝۍॠٕɰ. ş

҆ڵ܃ঔ०قңԐε߸Àॢąڍ, ş҆ڵ܃ঔ०قԓজ Ǭę ңԐε ʌ ߸Àॢ ąڍ, Ś थŒ ॥͟ۋ ÁÁ

149.03 g/tonę149.51 g/tonںصؽɰ. ԓজǬںʌ߸

À॰ں˺149.37 g/tonۆŚںধսॢąڍŔνČң Ԑεʌ߸Àॠي149.04 g/tonۆŚںধսॢąڍ, Ś

ধսقەرԴࢀমęÀǣࢍǣݓ؍ؕɰ. Śধսڱۋ

Àۤࡾóǣࢍǣəąڍəş҆ڵ܃ঔ०قԓজǬęң Ԑεʌ߸Àॢąڍ(149.51 g/ton)ۋɰ. Ŕ͠ǣŚধս ڱق ەرԴ ࢀ ٖॳڹ ǣࢍǣݓ ؍ؕɰ.

֢͒ŔقʂॢজॡқԵĀę

֢͒ŔͿ՜֬ʼəŚ ॥͟ęڙۍںőϼॠş ڦॠ ي, ؒԵф܁ġقʂॠيAu, Ag, Pb, Fe ˣۆ॥͟ں

ÁÁজॡқԵॠٕɰ(Table 4). ŔνČۋ˞ؒԵę܁

ġقʂॠيÁÁ֨ŚѪںսॱॠٕČ(Table 3), ۋ˺

ԦՁʽ֢͒ŔεজॡқԵॠٕɰ(Table 5). ؒԵق॥

ڮʽŚ॥͟ڹथŒ26.34 g/ton, ڹڹ42.03 g/tonۋٕ

Č, Pbə 528.43 mg/Kg, Feə 43.20 mg/Kgۋٕɰ.

ş҆ڵ܃ঔ०ڷͿ ֨ŚѪں սॱॠي ԦՁʽ ֢͒Ŕ (SMC-1), ş҆ڵ܃ঔ०قԓজǬ(5 g)ں߸Àॢ֢͒Ŕ (SMC-8), ş҆ڵ܃ঔ०قңԐ(10 g)ε߸Àॢ֢͒Ŕ (SMC-15), ŔνČş҆ڵ܃ঔ०قԓজǬ(5 g)ęңԐ (10 g)ε߸Àॢ֢͒ŔقԴŚथŒ॥͟ۋÁÁ4.98 g/

(7)

Table 5. The chemical composition of slag from rocks and concentrates by AAS analysis(7 repeats) units (Au and Ag;

g/ton, Pb ~ Fe; mg/kg) classification of

sample

mixture of fusion flux (slag name)

Au (St. D.)

gold losing(%)

Ag (St. D.)

Pb (St. D.)

Fe (St. D.)

rock

mixture 1 (SMC-1)

4.98

(0.87) 18.93 0.00

(0.00)

2324.98 (252.64)

576.44 (8.67) mixture 2

(SMC-8)

5.46

(0.29) 20.74 1.23

(2.41)

2578.78 (340.54)

574.05 (6.87) mixture 3

(SMC-15)

5.21

(0.63) 19.81 0.00

(0.00)

2376.37 (255.37)

571.46 (6.13) mixture 4

(SMC-22)

5.26

(0.51) 19.96 0.00

(0.00)

2367.23 (374.61)

570.22 (5.65)

concentrate

mixture 1 (SMC-29)

25.33

(0.70) 17.65 0.00

(0.00)

533.07 (5.76)

1551.64 (56.71) mixture 2

(SMC-36)

25.96

(0.65) 18.09 0.00

(0.00)

526.32 (3.53)

1385.06 (220.71) mixture 3

(SMC-43)

10.05

(0.15) 7.01 0.00

(0.00)

2618.03 (118.06)

534.54 (25.72) mixture 4

(SMC-50)

10.73

(2.35) 7.48 0.00

(0.00)

2750.16 (85.22)

511.15 (13.88) St. D.: standard deviation

ton, 5.46 g/ton, 5.21 g/ton, 5.26 g/tonͿࠑ܁ʼؽɰ. ݌

ş҆ڵ܃ঔ०قTable 1ęÏۋڵ܃εʌ߸Àॠي֨

ŚѪں սॱॠٕں ąڍ, Ś ՜֬ڱۋ ÁÁ 18.93%, 20.74%, 19.81%, 19.96%ͿǣࢍǮɰ. ۋəş҆ڵ܃ঔ ०قԓজǬںʌ߸À३ʪŚۋমęۺڷͿǬقपݚ ʼݓ؍ؕڼں, ңԐεʌ߸À३ʪőԓّġНقप॥ʽ

ŚۋʌমęۺڷͿ ڵ३-қνʼݓ Ї॰ڼں ۆйॢɰ.

܁ġق ॥ڮʽ Ś ॥͟ڹ थŒ 143.57 g/ton, ڹڹ

103.51 g/ton, Pbə 523.51 mg/Kg, Feə 1551.65 mg /KgڷͿǣࢍǮɰ. ş҆ڵ܃ঔ०قTable 1ęÏۋڵ܃

εʌ߸Àॠي֨ŚѪںսॱॢĀęŚ՜֬ڱۋÁÁ

17.66%, 18.09%, 7.0%, 7.48%ͿǣࢍǮɰ. ş҆ڵ܃ঔ ०ڷͿ֨ŚѪںսॱॠيԦՁʽ֢͒Ŕ(SMC-29)قԴ

Ś՜֬ڱڹ1.766%(थŒ॥͟= 25.33 g/ton), ş҆ڵ܃

ঔ०ق ԓজǬ(5 g)ں ߸Àॢ ֢͒Ŕ(SMC-36)قԴ Ś

՜֬ڱڹ18.09%(ŚथŒ॥͟= 25.96 g/ton)ۋٕɰ. ԓ জǬ5 gεʌ߸À३ʪŚ՜֬ڱڹÇՙॠݓ؍ؕɰ.

Ŕ͠ǣ ş҆ڵ܃ঔ०ق ңԐ(10 g)ε ߸Àॢ ֢͒Ŕ (SMC-43), ŔνČş҆ڵ܃ঔ०قԓজǬ(5 g)ęңԐ (10 g)ε ߸Àॢ ֢͒Ŕ(SMC-50)قԴ Ś ՜֬ڱڹ

7.0%ٮ7.48%ͿǣࢍǮɰ. ş҆ڵ܃ঔ०قңԐε߸

Àॢ ąڍ(SMC-43)ə ԓজǬں ߸Àॢ ąڍ(SMC-36)

҃ɰŚ՜֬͟ۋ11% ʌÇՙॠٕɰ. ŔνČş҆ڵ܃

ঔ०قԓজǬęңԐεÁÁʌ߸Àॢąڍ(SMC-50) Àɳտ০ԓজǬχ߸Àॢąڍ(SMC-36)҃ɰŚ՜֬

͟ۋ10.61% ʌÇՙॠٕɰ. ˰͆ԴԓজǬ҃ɰңԐ ÀʌŚ՜֬ںܶۋəʚমęÀەəìڷͿǣࢍǮɰ.

Č޶

֨ŚѪۋŚںমęۺڷͿқν-Ȭ߹ॣսەəۤ۾

˺ЛقইۦقʪটڌʼČەݓχي͠ÀݓڅۍڷͿ

Ś՜֬ۋьԦʼČەɰ. ؒԵę܁ġۆŚ॥͟قەر Դ֨ŚѪęAASқԵԐۋق޲ۋÀǣࢍǣČەɰ. ؒ ԵقԴŚ॥͟ڹ֨ŚѪ҃ɰAASқԵقԴȭóࠑ܁

ʼؽČ, ܁ġقԴŚ॥͟ڹAAS҃ɰ֨ŚѪقԴȭó

ࠑ܁ʼؽɰ. ۋٮÏڹठ޲ÀьԦॠəڙۍڹٶսͿ

ؒԵę܁ġںқ३॰ş˺ЛڷͿԐΒʽɰ. ێъۺڷͿ

ٶսͿডজġНںқ३ॠəąڍۛΪНۋԦՁʼəą ॳۋەɰ. ŔνČডজġНڹνࣟϭࢍ҃ͪۋ࣡(lithium metaborate)ǣνࣟࢬ࣡͆҃ͪۋ࣡(lithium tetrborate)ٮ

Ïڹڵ܃Ϳ1200قԴڵ३(fusion)३ʪۛΪНۋԦ Ձʽɰ(Potts, 1987).

ؒԵę܁ġق॥ڮʽŚںমęۺڷͿধսॠşڦॠ ي4Àݓڵ܃ঔ०ڷͿ֨ŚѪںսॱॢĀęؒԵۆ֢

͒ŔقԴथŒŚ՜֬ڱڹ19.86%ٕČ܁ġۆ֢͒Ŕ

(8)

قԴəथŒ12.55%ͿǣࢍǮɰ. ܁ġ҃ɰؒԵقԴŚ

՜֬ڱۋȭóǣࢍǮɰ. ۋəؒԵق॥ڮʽŚڹڵ܃

ঔ०ںѺজ֨ࡈ֨ŚѪںսॱ३ʪŚںমęۺڷͿқ ν-Ȭ߹ॠşرͲړںۆйॢɰ. Ŕ͠ǣ܁ġقԴңԐ ε߸À॰ںąڍŚ՜֬ڱۋই۹ॠóÇՙॠٕɰ. ۋ əңԐÀ܁ġۆডজġНںমęۺڷͿڵ३॰ڼںݓ

֨३ܵɰ. ˰͆ԴңԐÀؒԵ҃ɰডজġНقԴমę ۺےں ঝۍॠٕɰ.

ؒԵę܁ġۆ֢͒ŔقՙɰধٮՙŚۋ॥ڮʼرە ş˺Лق200 mesh ۋॠͿйқթॣ˺ড়֥ՁۆЛ܃

ÀǣࢍǦɰ. ড়֥ՁڷͿۍॠي؉óۋ࣡Ѓ࢐قҙ޳ʼ رқթÀ۞ۋΘرݓݓ؍əɰ. ̚ॢۋ˞֨Βεٶս Ϳқ३ॣ˺, ؒԵۆ֢͒ŔəٶսսϸڦͿҙڮʼر

মęۺڷͿқ३ÀۋΘرݓݓ؍əɰ. ŔνČ܁ġۆ֢

͒Ŕəٶսқ३঳ێъۺڷͿۛڮНۋǫəɰ. ˰͆

Դ ড়֥ՁęۛڮНͿ ۍॢ ٖॳں ČͲ३آॣ ìۋɰ.

Ā΁

Ǭ-֨ŚѪقԴ֢͒ŔͿ՜֬ʼəŚ॥͟ںܓԐॠي

՜֬ڙۍںőϼॠČۙॠٕɰ. ؒԵę܁ġقʂॠي4 Àݓڵ܃ঔ०ڷͿ֨ŚѪںսॱॠٕČŔ֢͒Ŕقʂ ॠيXRDқԵںսॱॢĀęѓٍԵ, ՙŚ, ǬфԵٖ

ۋě޶ʼؽɰ. XRDқԵĀęͿҙࢢ, ֨Śę܁قԴԵ

ٖۋমęۺڷͿқ३ʼݓЇॠٕČŔνČǬۋমęۺ ڷͿࠞۻʼݓЇ॰ڼںঝۍॠٕɰ. 4Àݓڵ܃ঔ०ڷ Ϳ֨ŚѪںսॱॢĀęؒԵۆ֢͒ŔقԴŚ՜֬ۋ

थŒ19.86%ٕČ܁ġۆ֢͒ŔقԴəथŒ12.55%Ϳ

ǣࢍǮɰ. Ś՜֬ۆڙۍڹ֨Śę܁قԴԵٖۋমę ۺڷͿڵ३ʼݓЇ॰ş˺ЛقŔνČǬۋমęۺڷͿ

ࠞۻʼݓЇ॰ş˺ЛقێرǣəìڷͿԐΒʽɰ. ֨ ŚѪقԴңԐÀŚ՜֬ںܶۋəʚؒԵ҃ɰ܁ġقԴ

ʌমęۺےںঝۍॠٕɰ.

ԐԐ

҆ ȦЛڹ ݓ֩ą܃ҙ ۙڙÒь ࣢ՁজʂॡԐغڷͿ

ݓڙʼؽ֥ɦɰ.

޷ČЛॶ

ଲ਎વ, ઑլ็, ୢֽࣦ, ࢽ׊, ճঃࡦ, ছ୨ࠔ, 2009, “ୢْ

ැْଭ০਑ׁֈॺ஺લ઩ॺౢ෇ۀଦฎ੹ா઩එฏܤ

କࠤඑକࢄ,” ੹জ෈ฎ஺, ୪18֫ 4෹, pp. 337-348.

କࣲశ, ଲ׊୍, ճঃࡦ, କࣦ૶, 2010, “ॿনׁ-ଠֈॺଭ

঍নฅլ: ֈজֈࢄ, କ఼එକࢄࢫੲ୨ܛ଍଀ী઴֜,”

ୀ଀ฅլ஺ா, ୪43֫ 5෹, pp. 443-453.

Allan, G.C. and Woodcock, J.T., 2001, “A review of the flotation of native gold and electrum,” Minerals Engin- eering, Vol. 14, pp. 931-962.

Baker, W.E., 1985, “Gold analysis,” URI, Vol. 49, pp. 1-6.

Balcerzak, M., 2002, “Sample digestion methods for the determination of traces of precious metals by spectro- metric techniques,” Analytical Sciences, Vol. 18, pp.

737-750.

Barefoot, R.R. and van Loon, J.C., 1999, “Recent advances in the determination of the platinum group elements and gold,” Talanta, Vol. 49, pp. 1-14.

Bedard, L.P. and Barnes, S.J., 2004, “Improved platinum- group element extraction by NiS fire assay from chromitite ore samples using a flux containing sodium metaphosphate”, Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, Vol. 28, pp.

311-316.

Bugbee, E.E., 1949, “A textbook fire assaying”, John Wiley

& Sons, Inc., p. 314.

Guerra, E. and Dreisinger, D.B., 1999, “A study of the factors affecting copper cementation of gold from ammoniacal thiosulfate solution,” Hydrometallurgy, Vol.

51, pp. 155-172.

Johnson, W.M. and Maxwell, J.A., 1981, “Rock and mineral analysis,” John Wiley & Sons, p. 489.

Juvonen, M.R., Bartha, A., Lakomaa, T.M., Soikkeli, L.A., Bertalan, E., Kallio, E.I. and Ballok, M., 2004, “Com- parison of recoveries by lead fire assay and nickel sulfide fire assay in the determination of gold, platinum, palladium and rhenium in sulfide ore samples,” Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, Vol. 28, pp. 123-130.

Juvonen, R. and Kontas, E., 1999, “Comparison of three analytical methods in the determination of gold in six finnish gold ores, inculding a study on sample preparation and sampling,” Journal of Geochemical Exploration, Vol.

65, pp. 219-229.

Juvonen, R. and Vaananen, P.J., 1993, “Determination of gold in geological materials by atomic absorption after lead fire assay separation,” Geological Survey of Finland, Report of Investigatiotin Vol. 114, pp. 13-16.

Liipo, J., 2003, “Characterization of the mode of occurrence of gold in Jokisivu pilot feed and products,” Minerals Engineering, Vol. 16, pp. 1317-1321.

McIntosh, K.S., Auer, D., Koch, K.R. and Eksteen, J.J., 2006, “Integrating pyrometallurgy and robotic systems engineering: fuly automated fire assay laboratory for rapid PGE analysis,” Minerals Engineering, Vol. 19, pp.

219-231.

(9)

׌ࣲச

ইۦ ܓԸʂॡİ ėęʂॡ قȃݓۙڙėॡę чԐę܁

(欧G 彳櫾躇G 缧49嘳G 缧4埲G 垾畢)

ૈਆ஺

2012țܓԸʂॡİقȃݓۙڙėॡę

ėॡԐ 

ইۦ ܓԸʂॡİ قȃݓۙڙėॡę ԵԐę܁

(E-mail; [email protected])

নָવ

1996țҙąʂॡİڿڌݓݗॡęۋॡԐ 1998țҙąʂॡİڿڌݓݗॡęۋॡ

ԵԐ

2002țҙąʂॡİڿڌݓݗॡęۋॡ чԐ

ইۦ ʴҙæԺ(ܳ) ۙڙԐغҙ ޲ۤ

(E-mail; [email protected])

ࢮవઽ

1980ț ܓԸʂॡİ ۙڙėॡę ėॡԐ 1982țܓԸʂॡİۙڙėॡęėॡԵԐ 1993țۻǫʂॡİۙڙėॡęėॡчԐ

ইۦ ܓԸʂॡİ قȃݓۙڙėॡę İս (E-mail; [email protected])

୺Գ็

2009ț ܓԸʂॡİ قȃݓۙڙėॡę

ėॡԐ

2011țܓԸʂॡİقȃݓۙڙėॡę

ėॡԵԐ

ইۦ ܓԸʂॡİ قȃݓۙڙėॡę чԐę܁

(E-mail; [email protected])

଍۩૽

ইۦ ܓԸʂॡİ قȃݓۙڙėॡę ԵԐę܁

(欧G 彳櫾躇G 缧49嘳G 缧4埲G 垾畢)

ౖ਎ฅ

2012țܓԸʂॡİقȃݓۙڙėॡę

ėॡԐ

ইۦ ܓԸʂॡİ قȃݓۙڙėॡę ԵԐę܁

(E-mail; [email protected])

ًౖశ

ইۦ ۻǫʂॡİ ėغşցٍĵՙ ٍĵİս (欧G 彳櫾躇G 缧49嘳G 缧4埲G 垾畢)

Potts, P.J., 1987, “A handbook of silicate rock analysis,”

Blackie, p. 622.

Rao, C.R.M. and Reddi, G.S., 2000, “Platinum group metals(PGM); occurance, use and recent trends in their determination,” Trends in Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 19, pp. 565-586.

Suominen, M., Kontas, E., Niskavaara, H., 2004, “Com- parison of silver and gold inquarting in the fire assay determination of Palladium, Platinum and Rhodium in

geological samples,” Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, Vol. 28, pp. 131-136.

Turan, A. and Yucel, O., 2011, “The effect of iron and oxidizing flux addition on the ire assay of low grade pyritic refractory gold ores,” Journal of Mining and Metallurgy, Vol. 47, pp. 219-227.

van Loon, J., 1977, “Analytical chemistry of the noble metals,” Pure & Appl. Chem., Vol. 49, pp. 1495-1505.

수치

Table 1. The mixtures of fusion flux for the lead-fire assay (units; g) classification
Table 2. Analytical result of the glassy slag by EDS  analysis
Fig. 3. The XRD patterns of glassy slag from the lead-fire  assay with rock (G; galena, H; halite, Q; quartz).
Fig. 5. SEM image of glassy slag surface (a; SMC-15,  b; SMC-29).঍ՁʽìڷͿ३Եʽɰ. ۋٮÏڹ߸܁ڹ֢͒ŔقČ॥͟ۆǬۋࠑ܁ʼؽş˺Лۋɰ(Table 5ۆPb ॥͟).ՙŚق३ɾʼəধۼԸۋ֢͒ŔقԴǣࢍəڙۍڹ֨Śę܁قԴڌڵߕۆҼԓںѓݓॠşڦॠيߐÀॢՙŚ˺Лۋɰ

참조

관련 문서

After choosing the type of bike, the next step is the right bike size. the right size for you from

44 글의 첫 번째 문장인 The most important thing in the Boat Race is harmony and teamwork.을 통해 Boat Race에서 가장 중요한 것은 조 화와 팀워크임을

Now that you have the right bike for you, it is important to learn the right riding position.. A poor riding position can lead to injuries

44 글의 첫 번째 문장인 The most important thing in the Boat Race is harmony and teamwork.을 통해 Boat Race에서 가장 중요한 것은 조 화와 팀워크임을

 The Dutch physicist Pieter Zeeman showed the spectral lines emitted by atoms in a magnetic field split into multiple energy levels...  With no magnetic field to align them,

웹 표준을 지원하는 플랫폼에서 큰 수정없이 실행 가능함 패키징을 통해 다양한 기기를 위한 앱을 작성할 수 있음 네이티브 앱과

_____ culture appears to be attractive (도시의) to the

- quadriceps tendon 이 슬개골 하연에서 tibial tuberocity에 부착.