• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

19 (parens patriae

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "19 (parens patriae"

Copied!
40
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

*

. . 1.

2. 3 . 1.

2.

3. ( )

. 1.

2.

3. ( )

.

* 2012

**

: 2013. 10. 21. / : 2013. 11. 30. / : 2013. 12. 10.

(2)

I.

19

.

1)

,

.

2)

.

, ,

.

3)

,

1)

. 18

.

.

. 19

(parens patriae) .

. 20

,

. 1983

. , “

,- -”,

10 2 , , 2003, 175~184 .

2) 3

, ,

( )

, , “

”, 35 , , 2012, 6-13 .

3) 2005 754 , 1,294

36.8% . , 2007 1,388 ,

1264 . 2010

(3)

.

.

4)

.

5)

. 1960

, 1988

. 2003

,

, , , 5

, 7

3525 171 20.6 .

4)

2008 9,034 4,366 48.6%

, 4,668 51.4% . 34.3%,

13.9% 3.2% , ,

, 2009, 1 .

5) 19

.

(Boston Children's Aid Society)

(Charles Birtwell) , ,

, ,

, , “

”, 7 , , 1998, 160-161

; 19

,

. 1948 (The Children Act)

(the Curtis Committee)

.

, , “ ”,

9 , , 2000, 267 .

(4)

.

6)

. “

” ( 2 7 ) .

“ ”

7)

,

.

. .

.

8)

,

.

. 19

.

6) , , 270 ; , “

”, 33 1 , , 2009, 243 ,

7) , , 244 .

8) Douglas E. Abrams / Sarah H. Ramsey, Children and the law, Thomson West, 2007, p.

432.

(5)

. 2012 11

( ) . ( )

. ( )

.

( ) .

.

. 19

.

9)

9) Northwest Foster Care Alumni Study (NWAlumni Study) 1988 1998

20 33

54.4%,

(PTSD) 25.2% ( 2

), 20.1% 17.1% .

1.8% .

18 22.2% .

16.8% 33.2%

33.0% .

(6)

.

,

.

, 3

,

(42 U.S.C. § 671 (a) (19)).

26

10)

. ,

.

, ,

,

.

11)

Colorado

12)

, Columbia

13)

http://www.casey.org/Resources/Publications/pdf/Improving FamilyFosterCare_FactSheet.pdf ;

2013 3 17

10) Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Califonia, Colorado, Delaware, Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Washington.

11) Doglas E. Abrams / Sarah H. Ramsey, supra. note 8, pp.. 491-493.

12) Colorado, Indiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Oregon, and Virginia.

13) Connecticut, Maryland, Montana, New Jersey, and New York.

(7)

.

14)

. 1992 Lipscomb v. Simmons

15)

, ,

.

. Oregon

, Oregon

.

. Oregon

.

16)

.

17)

14) Illinois New Mexico .

15) Lipscomb v. Simmons 884 F. 2d 1242 (9th Cir. 1989), rev`d, 962 F. 2d 1374 (9th Cir.

1992)(en banc)

16) David Peterson, “Constitutional Law - Lipscomb v. Simmons: State Foster Care Funding for Non-Relatives Only, Social Welfare or Parens Patriae”, 23 Golden Gate U. L. Rev.

1993, P. 78. ;

Lyng v. Castillo, 477 U.S. 635, 638 (1986) Dandridge v. Williams, 379 U.S. 471, 483-87 (1970) .

17) David Peterson, id. P. 79.

(8)

18)

Oregon

.

.

,

.

19)

.

20)

. ,

.

21)

,

.

22)

18) King v. McMahon 186 Cal. App. 3d 648 (1986). California

California .

19) David Peterson, supra, note 16, P. 80.

20) David Peterson, id. p. 81 21)

, Judith B. Scheindlin, Paying Grandmas to Keep Kids in Limbo, N. Y. Times, Aus. 29, 1994 http://www.nytimes.com/1994/08/29/opinion/paying-grandmas-to-keep-kids-in-limbo.html ;

2013 9 16

(9)

.

23)

24)

.

25) 26)

.

.

.

, .

22)

,

, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Child Welfare Information Gateway, pp. 3-4 ; https://www.

childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/statutes/homestudyreqs.pdf ; 2013 9 . 16

. (North Dakota)

1978 (Arizona, Mississippi)

, (Alabama, Arkansas,

Colorado, Indiana, Kansas, North Carolina, Texas, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin).

23) U.S. Department of Jealth and Human Services, Child Welfare Information Gateway, id., pp. 4-5.

24) Columbia 21 , Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana New Jersey 18

, Alabama Nebraska 19 U.S. Department of Jealth and

Human Services, Child Welfare Information Gateway, id., pp. 1-2.

25) Alabama, Arkansasm Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Dakota Utah : U.S.

Department of Jealth and Human Services, Child Welfare Information Gateway, id., pp.

1-2

26) Colorado, Maryland, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah

, Kentucky .

(10)

,

.

.

27)

( ) ,

( ( ) 10 ).

.

28)

( 974 )

.

.

.

(2008) ,

, ,

, ,

, .

27) U.S. Department of Jealth and Human Services, Child Welfare Information Gateway, supra, note 22, pp. 2-3.

28) 65%

, / , “

”, 22 ,

, 2006, 121~122 .

(11)

.

29)

( ) 6 1

,

( ) ,

,

,

,

“ ” .

.

,

. 2007

57.8%

43.4 % “ ”

.

30)

.

31)

,

29) , “ ”, 3 --

/ , 2009 ,

28 .

30) / / / , , , 2007 ;

, “ ”,

, 26 , 2009, 202 .

(12)

.

,

,

.

.

32)

( )

1 , 500 ,

( 39 )

. “ ”

.

( ) “ ”

( ( ) 1 )

18

, ,

, ,

( 5 1 ).

.

31) , “ ”, 6

, 2005 , 7 .

32) , , , 31 .

(13)

.

.

.

.

.

,

.

( )

,

( ( ) 9 1 , 3 4 )

( ( ) 6 1 2 ).

. ( )

( 6 1 2 ),

.

,

(14)

33)

.

.

( ) 6 2

( ) .

.

.

.

.

.

33) 19 ( )

.

21 ( )

. < 2009.1.30>

22 23

.

(15)

.

. ,

. 1970

2

.

,

.

1997 (Adoption and Safe Families Act)

(disposition hearing)’ ,

.

.

.

.

.

.

,

(16)

.

34)

.

.

35)

, . Simmons v.

Robinson

36)

. South Carolina

34) Doglas E. Abrams / Sarah H. Ramsey, supra. note 8, pp. 441~444..

35) Hanson v. Rowe, 18 Ariz. App. 131, 500 P.2d 916, 918 (1972)

. http://scholar.google.com/scholar _case?case=15360828043847969633&hl=en&as_sdt=

2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr 2013 9 18 ; Elton v. County of Orange, 3 Cal. App. 3d 1053, 84 Cal. Rptr. 27 (1970)

. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5051273025571340665&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis

=1&oi=scholarr ; Bartels v. County of Westchester, 76 App. Div. at 517, 429 N.Y.S.2d

906 (1980) ,

. http://www.leagle.com/decision/ 198059376AD2d517_1537 ; Little v. Utah State Div. of Family Services,667 P.2d 49 (Utah 1983)

. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13192819883032585817&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vi s=1&oi=scholarr ; Babcock v. State,116 Wn.2d 596, 809 P.2d 143 (1991)

. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=

15888330810712399234&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr 2013 9 19 36) Simmons v. Robinson, 303 S.C. 201, 399 S.E.2d 605 (Ct.App. 1990)

http://24.123.107.252/blackbelt_kf/ Case_Text_Kan/257K258.pdf 2013 9 19

(17)

. South Carolina

37)

,

.

1993 Stanley v. State Indust., Inc.,

38)

Stanly Dolores Hills

.

Bartels v. County of Westchester

39)

Vonner v. State Through Welfare Department of Public

40)

37) Simmons v. Robinson, 305 S.C. 428 (1991) 409 S.E.2d 381 http://scholar.google.com/scholar _case?case=10180979257605264280&hl=en&as_sdt=2,26 2013 9 19

38) Stanley v. State Indust., Inc., 630 A. 2d 1188 (N.J. 1993) http://www.leagle.com/decision/

1993434267NJSuper167_1418 2013 9 19

39) Bartels v. County of Westchester, 76 A.D.2d 517 (1980)

2 3

40%

. Westchester

,

.

New York Westchester

.

“1.

, A

. 2.

,

.

( 420 1 2 )”

. http://www.leagle.com /decision/ 198059376AD2d517_1537 2013 10 17

40) Vonner v. State Through Department of Public Welfare 258 So.2d 93 (1972) 5

: http://www.leagle.com/decision/1972351258So2d93_1334 2013 10

(18)

. Bartels Vonner

.

,

.

,

,

.

“ (deliberate indifference standard)” .

.

“ (professional judgement standard)”

.

41)

,

.

17

41) Doglas E. Abrams / Sarah H. Ramsey, supra. note.,8 p. 487.

(19)

( )

( ( ) 6 1 ),

( ( ) 9 3 , 5 ).

. ( )

( ( ) 22 1 ),

뺸G 15 4 ,

( ( ) 22 2 ).

(3 )

, 1

.

42)

.

( ) 3 6

, ,

( ( ) 24 1 1

). .

. ( )

.

42) , 2011 , 61-62 .

(20)

“ ”

, ( )

2

( ( ) 6 1 ).

,

.

43)

,

.

1.

3 6

, 2. 6

, 3.

, 4.

( ( ) 24

1 2 )

( ( ) 24 3 ).

43) 1998. 7. 24. 98 12270 ; 1998. 2. 27. 97 38442 ; 1997. 2. 11. 96 5933 ; 1994. 4. 26. 93 59304.

(21)

.

.

.

.

.

1977 Smith v. Organisation of Foster Families for Equality and Refor m

44)

, 14

45)

,

46)

.

,

. 1999 In Division of Family Services v. Harrison

47)

44) Smith v. Organization of Foster Families - 431 U.S. 816 (1977) http://supreme.justia.com/

cases/ federal/ us/431/816/case.html 2013 9 19

45) Cleveland Board of Education v. La Fleur (1974) ; Prince v. Messachusetts (1944).

46) Doglas E. Abrams / Sarah H. Ramsey, supra, note 8, p. 453.

47) In Division of Family Services v. Harrison, 741 A. 2d 1016 (Del. 1999) http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ de-supreme-court/1121918.html ; 2013 9 19

(22)

. David

David Butler . Butler

2 David .

David .

David

, Butler

David David

. Butler

David

. Butler

.

“ ”

.

“ ”

, Butler

David

.

48)

.

48) I.B. v. Department of Children and Families, 876 So. 2d 581(Fla. Dist.

Ct. App. 2004) http://www.leagle.com/decision/ 20041457876So2d581_11072 ; 2013 9 19

(23)

.

,

. 1991 In Re Ashley K

49)

.

Ashley K 5

Ashley K .

1991 Illinois , Ashley K

. ,

Ashley K 13

. Ashley K

,

.

. 1996 Marisol A. v. Giuliani

50)

49) In Re Ashley K 212 Ill. App.3d 849, 571 N.E.2d 905 (1991) http://www.

leagle.com/decision/ 19911476571NE2d905_11407 ; 2013 9 19

50) Marisol A. v. Giuliani United States District Court, S.D.N.Y., 1996, 929 F. Supp. 662 ;

(1) New York

, (2)

, (3) ,

(24)

.

11 .

New York

.

.

51)

.

Estelle v. Gamble ,

52)

, (4)

, (5) New York

, ,

, (6) HIV/ADIS (7)

(8)

, (9) 10

, (10) (11)

, (12) ,

. http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/

getcase.pl?navby=search&case=/data2/circs/2nd/969132v3.html ; 2013 9 19 51) DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept of Social Services 489 U.S. 189 : DeShaney

DeShaney

DeShaney , DeShaney

DeShaney

14

DeShaney .

14 .

,

DeShaney

. http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0489_

0189_ ZS.html ; 2013 9 19

(25)

Youngberg v. Romeo .

53)

.

.

54)

,

,

.

55)

. New York

.

(penumbral)

.

56)

52) Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976) Gamble Gamble

Gamble .

. http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/429/ 97/case.html 2013 9 19

53) Youngberg v. Romeo, 457 U.S. 307 (1982) : Nicholas Romeo

. http://supreme. justia.com/cases/ federal/

us/457/307/case.html ; 2013 9 18

54) Doglas E. Abrams / Sarah H. Ramsey, supra. note 8, p. 477.

55) Doglas E. Abrams / Sarah H. Ramsey, id., p. 478.

(26)

.

57)

.

58)

.

3. ( )

. In Division of Family Services v. Harrison

.

,

.

59)

56) Child v. Beame, 412 F. Supp. 593 (S.D.N.Y.1976) ; http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case

=6157525351430785899&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr 2013 9 18

57) Aristotle P. v. Johnson, 721 F.Supp. 1002 (N.D.Ill.1989); http://scholar.google.com/scholar_

case?case=15383749724165406806&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr 2013 9 18

58) Doglas E. Abrams / Sarah H. Ramsey, supra. note 8, p. 479.

(27)

( ) ,

,

1 ,

( ( ) 16 1 ).

, ,

( ( )

16 2 ).

.

60)

( ( ) 16 3 )

. ( )

.

( 927 2)

59) , “ ”, 610 , , 2007, 97 .

60)

( 12 1 )

( 12 2 ) ‘

’ ,  ‘  ’ 

         

      , , , 266

. ( )

.

(28)

. 1

( ) ,

. . ( )

, 1

( ) .

( )

. ( )

. ,

( 870 1 2 )

( 870 1 3 )

.

, ( )

.

.

( ) ,

, (

( ) 924 1 ). ( )

(29)

,

( ) ( )

. ( )

( )

. ( )

. ( )

.

. In Re Ashley K

. Marisol A

.

61)

( )

18

61) 36 1

,

. , “

”, 43 1 ,

, 2004, 152-154 .

(30)

. 1 ,

2007

2,208 17.02% 18

47% . 2006

.

18 .

, ,

1-2

. 2006 48%

‘ ’ , ‘

’ 6.0% .

. ‘

’ 28% , 1

8% 36%

.

62)

, ( )

,

63)

.

62) , , , , , , 2006

; , “ ”, 3

/ , 2009 , 14

.

63) 8.3%

.

180 (71.4%) .

32 (12.7%) .

' ' . 1 285 489

(38%) . 323

(25.1%), 312 (24.3%) .

20 , 11 :

http://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD&aid=0006271532&mid=shm&oid=001

&sid1=102&nh= 20130522061140 2013 9 19 .

(31)

. (periodic review hearing)

.

.

.

.

.

.

64)

.

,

64) / , , 118~120 .

(32)

,

( 20 ).

1985

. 1

2000 .

,

.

.

, ,

.

. ( )

, , ,

. “

.

( )

( )

(33)

. , ( )

,

. .

.

. ( )

.

( ) .

(34)

, “ ”, 610 , , 2007.

, , 2009.

/ , “

”, 16 3 ,

, 2011.

, “ ,-

-”, 10 2 ,

, 2003.

, “ ”,

33 1 , , 2009.

, “ ”,

43 1 , , 2004.

, “ ”, 35 ,

, 2012.

, “ ”, 7 ,

, 1998.

, “ ”,

9 , , 2000.

, “

”, 22 , , 2006.

, “ ”, 6

, 2005 .

David Peterson, “Constitutional Law - Lipscomb v. Simmons: State Foster Care

Funding for Non-Relatives Only, Social Welfare or Parens Patriae”, 23

(35)

Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 1993.

Douglas E. Abrams / Sarah H. Ramsey, Children and the law, Thomson West, 2007.

http://www.casey.org/Resources/Publications/pdf/ImprovingFamilyFosterCare _FactSheet.pdf ; 2013 3 17

http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/lawspolicies/statutes/homestudyreqs.cfm;

2012 12 20 .

http://www.mw.go.kr/front_new/mw/smw0101mn.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=01&MENU _ID=010101.

http://libproxy.jnu.ac.kr/2f584ed/_Lib_Proxy_Url/international.westlaw.com/find/def

ault.wl?mt=LawSchool &

db=345&findtype=Y&stid=%7b2f2f08b4-8079-4096-bbf1-e36ce7f11e7e%7d

&tc=-1&rp=%2ffind%2fdefault.wl&spa=chonnam-04&ordoc=1999094446&s erialnum=1996139175&vr=2.0&fn=_top&sv=Split&tf=-1&referencepositiont ype=S&pbc=637B312C&referenceposition=693&rs=WLIN13.01

http://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD&aid=0006271532&mid=shm&oid

=001&sid1=102&nh= 20130522061140 ; 2013 5 21 4 .

Aristotle P. v. Johnson, 721 F.Supp. 1002 (N.D.Ill.1989) Babcock v. State,116 Wn.2d 596, 809 P.2d 143 (1991)

Bartels v. County of Westchester, 76 App.Div. at 517, 429 N.Y.S.2d 906 (1980)

Child v. Beame, 412 F.Supp. 593, 603 (S.D.N.Y.1976) Cleveland Board of Education v. La Fleur (1974)

DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept of Social Services (1989)

Elton v. County of Orange,3 Cal.App.3d 1053, 84 Cal.Rptr. 27 (1970) Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976)

Hanson v. Rowe,18 Ariz.App. 131, 500 P.2d 916, 918 (1972)

I.B. v. Department of Children and Families, 876 So. 2d 581(Fla. Dist. Ct.

App. 2004)

(36)

In Re Ashley K 212 Ill. App.3d 849, 571 N.E.2d 905 (1991)

In Division of Family Services v. Harrison, 741 A. 2d 1016 (Del. 1999) King v. McMahon 186 Cal. App. 3d 648 (1986)

Little v. Utah State Div. of Family Services,667 P.2d 49 (Utah 1983)

Lipscomb v. Simmons 884 F. 2d 1242 (9th Cir. 1989), rev`d, 962 F. 2d 1374 (9th Cir. 1992)(en banc)

Marisol A. v. Giuliani United States District Court, S.D.N.Y., 1996, 929 F.

Supp. 662

Simmons v. Robinson, 303 S.C. 201, 399 S.E.2d 605 (Ct.App. 1990).

Simmons v. Robinson, 305 S.C. 428 (1991) 409 S.E.2d 381.

Smith v. Organization of Foster Families - 431 U.S. 816 (1977) Stanley v. State Indust., Inc., 630 A. 2d 1188 (N.J. 1993) : Suter v. Artist M. 503 U.S. 347(1992)

Prince v. Messachusetts (1944).

Wilder v. Virginia Hosp. Ass'n, 496 U.S. 498 (1990)

Youngberg v. Romeo, 457 U.S. 307 (1982)

(37)

< >

, 3

. 1988

, ( 2 7 ).

, , ,

.

.

.

.

. , 3

.

. 2012 11

( ) . ( ) ,

.

(38)

, ( )

. ( )

.

(39)

Abstract

:

A study on the multifaceted legal relations of the foster care

Cha, Seon-Ja

*65)

Foster care system is the child rearing service given by foster family within limited duration. It was introduced in 1988 and its legal grounds is in Art. 2 Nr.

7 of the Child Welfare Act. Foster care system feathers dynamic and multifaceted legal relations between foster parents and foster children, between the nation and foster parents and foster children, and between foster parents and legal parents.

Furthermore, while operating foster care system, the balances between the segregation of the children from their family in case of the abuse and neglect and the reunification with their original family are very important to protect children`s human right. In America diverse legal problems from the multifaceted relations of the foster care are solved by the decisions of the court. Besides the juvenile court is involved in the beginning the process to protect the children who can not be reared by their parents. It decides whether the children should be adopted, be placed in foster family, and be resent to their original family. In Korea foster care program is arranged on the basis of the Child Welfare Act, however this act is enacted for the child welfare generally, not just for the foster care relations. Therefore, the Child Welfare Act does not provide detailed regulations which are necessary to enforce the foster care system. For this reason, 뺷Bill of Supporting Act for Foster Care뺸Gwas proposed. This Bill provides the qualification of foster parents, child protecting standards about the child abuse by foster parents after the placement and the suspension of the legal custody ect. However, considering the diverse problems of foster care system in America, it is not clear that diverse legal problems can be solved with the provisions of the 뺷Bill of Supporting Act for Foster Care뺸. On the basis of the critical mind, this paper examines the contents of the 뺷Bill of Supporting Act for Foster Care뺸and dealt with which of them should be supplemented to solve the diverse problems caused in running foster care program.

* Chonnam National University, Law School, Associate Professor

(40)

참조

관련 문서

여러 개의 단일 시료를 유량에 비례하여 채취한 후 혼합한 것이다. 임의 채취보다 신뢰성이 높다. 유량과 농도가 시간에 따라 변화하는 경우에는 시료 채취량을

경사 강하식의 구조대가 방화대상물의 벽면에 대해서 이루는 각도로서 적당한

경사 강하식의 구조대가 방화대상물의 벽면에 대해서 이루는 각도로서 적당한

다음은 연결살수설비가 설치된 하나의 송수구역에 설치한 헤드수가 12 개인 경우 송수구의 설치 상태이다.. 송수구로부터 주배관에

가압송수장치의 펌프가 작동하고 있으나 포헤드에서 포가 방출되지 않는 경 우의 원인으로서 관계가

이산화탄소 소화설비의 약제 저장용기는 고압식 내압시험에 있어서 얼마 이 상의 내압시험에

Keywords: Organizational Culture, Human Resource Management, Networks, Research and Development Department, Entrepreneurship. * Master of Business

Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Department