• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Calculation of the Peak-hour Ratio at Urban Railway Stations Reflecting Passenger Demand Pattern and Land Use Inventory - A Case of Seoul -

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Calculation of the Peak-hour Ratio at Urban Railway Stations Reflecting Passenger Demand Pattern and Land Use Inventory - A Case of Seoul -"

Copied!
10
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

Received December 13 2012, Revised February 15 2013, Accepted April 11 2013

Copyright ⵑ 2013 by the Korean Society of Civil Engineers

 ǣŠ––’ǣȀȀ†šǤ†‘‹Ǥ‘”‰ȀͳͲǤͳʹ͸ͷʹȀ•…‡ǤʹͲͳ͵Ǥ͵͵ǤͶǤͳͷͺͳ ™™™Ǥ•…‡Œ‘—”ƒŽǤ‘”Ǥ”

⡷ᇛ#⟖ⱒ#㣦㛲ኺ#⮫⛶ፊⴖ#㝞⽾ⴲⱧ#㡷⛯ⴂ#⇖⮿㬚#ᦂ⢚㉞ᦂ⮫#㉦ᨎ⢚ᇂ#

⾏⻏἞#♮ⷓ##0#⛚ⱶ⢚Ἲ#ᢾ♿⳺Ḛ#0

ୋনผ ȵ׌ต਎ ȵଲ఻଀ ȵ׌ܛָ

Jang, Sunghoon*, Kim, Hyo-Seung**, Lee, Chungwon***, Kim, Dong-Kyu****

Calculation of the Peak-hour Ratio at Urban Railway Stations Reflecting Passenger Demand Pattern and Land Use Inventory - A Case of Seoul -

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to suggest a methodology for calculating the peak-hour ratio of passengers at urban railway stations by reflecting the characteristics of passenger demand patterns and the land use inventory of stations. To achieve this, urban railway stations in Seoul are divided into three groups by using factor analysis and cluster analysis. For each station group, we calculate five and four variables related to the passenger demand patterns and the land use inventory of stations, respectively, as well as the peak-hour ratios of passengers. Among these nine variables, average daily passengers and the location quotient (LQ) index for business services are selected as the classification criteria for station groups based on statistical tests. Using the two variables, a group allocation process is suggested to estimate the peak-hour ratio of passengers for a newly-constructed station. Evaluation results based on thirteen stations show that the proposed methodology produces lower errors than the currently-used guideline does. The results of this study contribute to establishing efficiently construction and operation plans for newly-constructed stations.

Key words : Peak-hour ratio, Passenger demand pattern, Land use inventory, Clustering analysis, Group allocation process

Ⅹಾ

ᅙᩑǍ۵ᩎᔍ᮹᜚~ᙹ᫵➉▕ŝ☁ḡᯕᬊ✚ᖒᮥၹᩢ⦹ᩍࠥ᜽℁ࠥᩎ᜚~᮹℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᮥᔑᱶ⦹۵ႊჶುᮥᱽ᜽⦹۵äᮥ༊ᱢᮝ ಽ⦽݅. ᯕෝ᭥⦹ᩍ᫵ᯙᇥᕾŝǑḲᇥᕾᮥʑၹᮝಽᕽᬙ᜽ࠥ᜽℁ࠥᩎᔍෝ3}᮹ə൚ᮝಽᇥඹ⦽݅. bə൚ᄥಽᯕᬊᙹ᫵᮹℉ࢱ᜽eḲ ᵲශŝ⧉̹ࠥ᜽℁ࠥ᜚~ᙹ᫵➉▕ŝᩎᔍ᮹☁ḡᯕᬊŝšಉ⦽5aḡᄡᙹ᪡4aḡᄡᙹෝbbᔑ⇽⦽݅. ☖ĥáᱶᮥʑၹᮝಽ, ᯕᄡᙹॅ

ᵲᯝ⠪Ɂ᜚~ᙹ᪡ᨦྕLQḡᙹaᩎᔍ᮹ə൚ᮥǍᇥ⦹۵ʑᵡᮝಽᖁᱶࡽ݅. ࢱᄡᙹॅᮥ⪽ᬊ⦹ᩍᔩಽÕᖅࡹ۵ࠥ᜽℁ࠥᩎ᮹℉ࢱ᜽e

Ḳᵲශᮥ⇵ᱶ⦹ʑ᭥⦽ə൚⧁ݚŝᱶᮥᱽ᜽⦽݅. 13}᮹ࠥ᜽℁ࠥᩎᯱഭෝᯕᬊ⦽á᷾ᮥ☖⧕ᅙᩑǍ᮹ႊჶುᮡ⩥ᰍᯕᬊࡹ۵ḡ⋉ᨱእ

⦹ᩍ޵ᱢᮡ᪅₉ෝᔑ⇽⧁ᙹᯩ݅۵äᮥ⪶ᯙ⦹ᩡ݅. ᅙᩑǍ᮹ႊჶುᮡᝁȽ℁ࠥᩎᔍ᮹⬉ᮉᱢᯙÕᖅၰᬕᩢĥ⫮ᙹพᨱʑᩍ⧁ᙹᯩᮥ

äᮝಽᔍഭࡽ݅.

áᔪᨕ ℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශ, ᜚~ᙹ᫵➉▕, ☁ḡᯕᬊ, ǑḲᇥᕾ, ə൚⧁ݚŝᱶ

”ƒ•’‘”–ƒ–‹‘‰‹‡‡”‹‰ İࣀėॡ

(2)

Fig. 1. Flow of Research

1. ᕽು

1.1 ઴֜ଭࢼլࢫࡧୡ

℁ࠥᩎ ᜚~ᙹ᫵᮹ ℉ࢱ᜽e Ḳᵲශᮡ ℁ࠥ᜽ᖅ᮹ ĥ⫮ ၰ

ᬕᩢᨱᵲ᫵⦽᫵ᗭಽ⪽ᬊࡹŁᯩ݅. ℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᮥʑᵡᮝಽ

ĥ݉ᯕӹݡʑŖe, ᅕ⧪☖ಽ᪡zᮡʑ᳕᮹ᩎᔍ᜽ᖅᮥᖅĥ⦹

Ł(Korea Rail Network Authority, 2010a), ⪹᜚ᖝ░᜽ᖅ᮹ᕽእ ᜅᙹᵡᇥᕾᨱᔍᬊ⦹ᩍ⩥⫊ᇥᕾၰ⨆⬥ᬕᩢĥ⫮ᮥษಉ⦽݅

(Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 2010).

ࠥ᜽℁ࠥ᮹ ℉ࢱ᜽e Ḳᵲශᮡ ݅ᮭŝ zᮡ ✚Ḷᮥ w۵݅.

ຝᱡ, ᜽⋕Łෝݡᔢᮝಽ⦽ʑ᳕ᩑǍᨱ঑෕໕, ᜚ᬊ₉ᨱእ⦹ᩍ

ݡᵲƱ☖᮹℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᯕ޵׳ᮝ໑, ✚⯩Ųᩎ℁ࠥ᮹Ğᬑ

℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᯕ᧞25%, ࠥ᜽℁ࠥ᮹Ğᬑ᧞17%᮹sᮥw۵

॒ ℁ࠥ᮹ ℉ࢱ᜽e Ḳᵲශᯕ ׳ᮡ äᮝಽ ᳑ᔍࡹᨩ݅(Vuchic, 2005 ᰍᯙᬊ). ੱ⦽, ᯝၹᱢᮝಽᵝÑḡǍᨱᕽᨦྕḡǍಽ᮹☖⧪

ᮡ᪅ᱥ℉ࢱ᜽, ၹݡႊ⨆ᮡ᪅⬥℉ࢱ᜽ᨱḲᵲ⦹۵Ğ⨆ᮥᅕᯕ໑, ᔢᨦḡǍ᮹Ğᬑᔢݡᱢᮝಽ℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᯕԏᮡĞ⨆ᮥᅕᯙ

݅(Black, 1995).

⩥ᰍᬑญӹ௝ᨱᕽᝁȽ℁ࠥᩎᔍෝÕᖅ⧁ভᩎᔍෝᯕᬊ⧁

᜚~ᙹ᮹℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᮡḡ⋉॒ᨱ໦⪶⯩ᱽ᜽ࡹᨕᯩḡᦫᮝ ໑, ᩑǍᯱ᮹ᯱᮉᱢᯙ❱݉ᨱɝÑ⦹ᩍəsᮥᱢᬊ⦹Łᯩ݅.

঑௝ᕽᩎᔍෝᯕᬊ⦹۵℉ࢱ᜽e᜚~ᙹෝᱶ⪶⯩⇵ᱶ⦹۵ߑᨱ

ᨕಅᬡᯕᯩŁ, ᯕ۵ᝁȽᩎᔍ᮹Ƚ༉ᔑᱶᨱྙᱽෝ᧝ʑ᜽┉݅.

ᅙᩑǍ۵ᝁȽᩎᔍÕᖅ᜽, ࠥ᜽℁ࠥᩎᮥᯕᬊ⦹۵᜚~ᙹ᮹

℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᮥ⇵ᱶ⦹۵ႊჶುᮥᱽ᜽⦹۵ᩑǍಽᕽᕽᬙ᜽

ࠥ᜽℁ࠥᩎᄥ᜚~ᙹ᫵➉▕ŝᩎᖙǭ᮹☁ḡᯕᬊ✚ᖒᨱ঑ෙ

℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᮥᔑ⇽⦹ᩍࠥ᜽℁ࠥ᮹ᰆ௹Õᖅၰᬕᩢĥ⫮᮹

⬉ᮉ⪵ᨱ ʑᩍ⦹Łᯱ ⦽݅.

1.2 ઴֜ଭ࣐଍ࢫࢺ࣑

ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵℁ࠥᔑᨦᱶᅕᖝ░ᨱᕽᱽŖ⦹۵2011֥ᕽᬙ᜽

ࠥ᜽℁ࠥᩎᄥ᜚⦹₉ᯙᬱᯱഭ(http://www.kric.or.kr/index.jsp)

ෝၵ┶ᮝಽ℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශ✚ᖒᮥᔑ⇽⦹Ł, ᜚~ᙹ᫵➉▕ŝ

☁ḡᯕᬊ✚ᖒᮥၹᩢ⦽℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᔑᱶႊჶುᮥᱽ᜽⦹Ł

ᯱ ⦽݅. ᩑǍ᮹ ⮱෥ᮡ Fig. 1ŝ z݅.

ࠥ᜽℁ࠥᩎ᮹℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᮡᩎᮥᯕᬊ⦹۵᜚~ᙹ᫵➉▕

ŝḢᱲᱢᯙšಉᯕᯩᮝ໑, ☁ḡᯕᬊ✚ᖒŝƱ☖✚ᖒᮡๅᬑၡᱲ

⦽šಉᯕᯩᮝအಽ, ᩎᖙǭ᮹✚ᖒੱ⦽⧕ݚᩎᔍෝᯕᬊ⦹۵

᜚~ᙹ᫵➉▕ŝʫᮡšಉᖒᮥw۵݅. ঑௝ᕽ᯦ಆᄡᙹಽᕽ᜚~

ᙹ᫵ ➉▕ ᄡᙹ᪡ ☁ḡᯕᬊ ᄡᙹෝ ᖅᱶ⦹ʑಽ ⦽݅. ᜚~ᙹ᫵

➉▕ᄡᙹಽ۵bࠥ᜽℁ࠥᩎᔍᄥ᜚⦹₉ᯙᬱ᮹✚Ḷᮥӹ┡ԝ

ᙹᯩ۵ᯝ⠪Ɂ᜚~ᙹ, ᪅ᱥ℉ࢱ᜽e᜚~እᮉ(2᜽e), ᪅⬥℉ࢱ

᜽e᜚~እᮉ(2᜽e), እ℉ࢱ᜽e᜚~እᮉ(16᜽e), ᱥℕᯙᬱᙹ

ݡእ ᜚₉᜚~ᙹ እᮉ ॒ 5}᮹ ᄡᙹෝ ᔍᬊ⦽݅.

☁ḡᯕᬊᄡᙹಽ۵ᕽᬙ᜽ᙹ⊹ḡᱢࠥ᪡Õ⇶ྜྷݡᰆ(2009֥

ʑᵡ) ᯱഭෝ ᯕᬊ⦹ᩍ ᩎᖙǭᮥ ᖅᱶ⦹Ł ᬊࠥᄥ Location Quotient(LQ) ḡᙹෝ ᔑ⇽⦽݅(Kim, 2012). ☁ḡᯕᬊ ᬊࠥ۵

ᵝÑ, ᔢᨦ, ᨦྕ, ʑ┡॒4aḡಽǍᇥ⦽݅. LQḡᙹ۵ᱥǎ᮹

࠺ᯝᔑᨦŝእƱ⦹ᩍ✚ᱶḡᩎᔑᨦ᮹ᵲ᫵ࠥෝ⊂ᱶ⦹۵ႊჶᮝ ಽᬊࠥᄥLQḡᙹෝᔑ⇽⧉ᮝಽ៉ᩎᖙǭ᮹☁ḡᯕᬊ✚ᖒᮥŁಅ

⧁ᙹᯩ݅. ݉, ᩎᖙǭ}ၽ໕ᱢᯕ0.05% ၙอᯙᩎᮡᇥᕾᨱ

ᯩᨕᯕᔢ⊹ಽeᵝ⦹ᩍᱽ᫙⦹ᩡ݅. ᩎᖙǭᮡࠥ᜽ĥ⫮ჶ᮹ḡǍ ᔢᖙĥ⫮ ḡ⋉ᨱ ঑௝ ᩎᮥ ʑᵡᮝಽ ၹĞ 500mಽ ᖅᱶ⦽݅.

bᩎᔍᄥᄡᙹsᮥᯕᬊ⦹ᩍ᫵ᯙᇥᕾ(factor analysis)ႊჶ

ᵲᵝᖒᇥᇥᕾŝǑḲᇥᕾ(cluster analysis)ႊჶᵲĥ⊖ᱢǑḲᇥ ᕾᮥ☖⧕ᩎᔍॅᮥᮁᔍ⦽✚ᖒᮥw۵ə൚ᮝಽྗᨕbə൚᮹

✚ᖒᮥ⪶ᯙ⦽݅. ᫵ᯙᇥᕾ᜽᫵ᯙ⧪಍᮹⧕ᕾᮥ᳡޵ᬊᯕ⦹í

⦹ʑ᭥⧕ḢƱ⫭ᱥႊჶ(orthogonal rotation method) ᵲᄁญๆᜅ (varimax)ჶᮥᯕᬊ⦹ᩍ⫭ᱥ᜽┅໑, ǑḲᇥᕾ᜽ǑḲݡᔢe᮹

Ñญ۵ᮁⓕญॵᦩᱽŒÑญෝᯕᬊ⦽᪡ऽ(Ward’s linkage) ႊჶ

ᮥ ᔍᬊ⦽݅.

ǑḲᇥᕾᙹ⧪⬥ᨱ۵ᔩ೎íÕᖅࢁᩎᯕᨕ۱ə൚ᨱ⡍⧉ࢁḡ

ෝđᱶ⦹ʑ᭥⦹ᩍə൚⧁ݚŝᱶᮥᖅᱶ⦽݅. ᯕෝ᭥⧕ə൚

eᨱ॒ᇥᔑၰ⠪Ɂ᮹࠺ᯝᖒᨱݡ⦽áᱶᮥ⦹Ł, ə൚᮹₉ᯕෝ

aᰆ᯹ᖅ໦⦹۵ᄡᙹᨱݡ⧕ᕽbox-plotᮥ☖⧕ə൚ᯕӹڹ۵

(3)

Ğĥsᮥ ᖅᱶ⦽݅. ᇥᕾᮥ ᭥⦽ ☖ĥᱢ ⥥ಽəఉᮝಽ۵ SPSS 19.0, SAS 9.3ŝ ArcGIS 9.3ᮥ ᔍᬊ⦹ᩡ݅.

2. ʑ᳕ྙ⨭Łₑၰႊჶುá☁

2.1 షܪਏԩுணࠔւߛ઴֜

ࠥಽƱ☖ప᮹℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᨱšಉࡽᩑǍ۵݅ᙹḥ⧪ࡹᨩ

݅. Chung et al.(2009)᮹ᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ݡᱥ, ᇡᔑ, ᬙᔑŲᩎǭᮥ

ݡᔢᮝಽ᜽eݡᄥƱ☖ప᮹⠪Ɂŝ⢽ᵡ⠙₉ෝᱢᬊ, ℉ࢱ᜽e

Ḳᵲශᮥǭᩎᄥಽᔑ⇽⦹ᩡ݅. ᇥᕾđŝ, ᇡᔑŲᩎ᜽᮹Ğᬑ

℉ࢱ4᜽e࠺ᦩ8.1%, ݡᱥŲᩎ᜽۵℉ࢱ3᜽e࠺ᦩ7.7%, ᬙᔑŲ ᩎ᜽۵ ℉ࢱ 4᜽e ࠺ᦩ 8.3%᮹ ℉ࢱ᜽e Ḳᵲශᮥ ӹ┡ԩ݅.

Sung et al.(2009) ᮡࠥಽƱ☖పᯱഭෝᯕᬊ⦹ᩍ᜽eݡᄥ

Ʊ☖ప᮹➉▕ᇥᕾᮥ☖⦽ᮁᱥᯱ᦭Łญ᷹ᮥᱢᬊ⦹ᩍ᪡⧕ḡ ᱱ(break point)ෝ₟ᦥ℉ࢱ᜽eݡ᪡እ℉ࢱ᜽eݡෝǍᇥ⦹ᩡ

݅. ᇥᕾđŝ᜚ᬊ₉᮹Ğᬑ℉ࢱ11᜽e࠺ᦩ℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᯕ

6.58%, ✙౎᮹Ğᬑ℉ࢱ11᜽e࠺ᦩ℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᯕ6.65%ᯙ

äᮝಽ ᇥᕾࡹᨩ݅.

Kim and Chang(2012) ᮡ᜽eݡᄥࠥಽƱ☖పᮥ⪝⧊ǑḲᇥ ᕾᮥ☖⦹ᩍ᜚ᬊ₉, ✙౎, ᱥ₉᳦ᨱݡ⦹ᩍ℉ࢱ, እ℉ࢱၰᝍ᧝᜽

eݡಽ Ǎᇥ⦹ᩡ݅. ᇥᕾđŝ ᜚ᬊ₉۵ 6.05%, ✙౎ᮡ 6.27%, ᱥ₉᳦ᨱ ݡ⧕ᕽ۵6.08%᮹℉ࢱ᜽e Ḳᵲශᮥ w۵ äᮝಽ

ऽ్ԍ݅.

℁ࠥ᮹℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᨱš⦽ᩑǍ۵ࠥಽᨱእ⧕ᕽᇡ᳒⦽

ᝅᱶᯕ݅. Korea Rail Network Authority(2010b)ᨱᕽ۵ǎaƱ

☖DB᮹ʑ᳦ᱱ☖⧪పᯱഭෝaḡŁ℉ࢱ᜽eݡ᪡እ℉ࢱ᜽eݡ ᮹ḲᵲශᮥᄡĞ⦹໕ᕽ☖⧪᜽eᮥᔑᱶ⦹Ł, ᯕෝᝅ⊂sŝእƱ

⦽đŝᝅᱽ☖⧪᜽eᨱaᰆɝᱲ⦹۵℉ࢱ᜽eݡ᮹Ḳᵲශᮥ

᧞8.5%, እ℉ࢱ᜽eݡ᮹Ḳᵲශᮥ᧞5.1%ಽ⇵ᱶ⦹ᩡ݅. ⦹ḡอ

ᯕ۵ ᝅ⊂ᯱഭ᮹ ʑၹᯕ ᦥܭ ☖⧪᜽e᮹ ᔑᱶᮥ ᭥⧕ ᯥ᮹ಽ

℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᮥ᳑ᱶ⦹ᩡŁ, ℁ࠥ᮹℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᮥᔑᱶ⦹

۵ߑᨱᯩᨕࠥಽƱ☖పʑၹ᮹ᯱഭෝᯕᬊ⦽݅۵⦽ĥaᯩ݅.

Kim(2007) ᮡ2003֥뺷ᕽᬙ᜽aǍ☖⧪ᝅ┽᳑ᔍ뺸Gᯱഭෝᯕᬊ

⦹ᩍ ᪅ᱥ ℉ࢱ 2᜽e, ᪅⬥ ℉ࢱ 2᜽e ࠺ᦩ᮹ ᜚ᬊ₉, ქᜅ,

℁ࠥᙹ݉᮹Ḳᵲශᮥᔑ⇽⦹ᩍŲᩎ☖⧪᮹✚ᖒᮥᇥᕾ⦹ᩡ݅.

۵ ݅᜽ ᕽᬙ ԕᇡ, ᮁ⇽, ᮁ᯦ 3aḡಽ ᇥඹ⦹ᩍ ᔑ⇽⦹ᩡ݅.

℁ࠥ ᙹ݉᮹ Ğᬑ ᪅ᱥ ℉ࢱ 2᜽e࠺ᦩ ᕽᬙ ԕᇡ᮹ Ḳᵲශᮡ

18.0% ᯙߑእ⧕ᕽᕽᬙಽᮁ᯦ࡹ۵ᯕᬊ~᮹Ḳᵲශᮡ28.9%ಽ

׳ᮡእᮉᮥӹ┡ԩ݅. ⦹ḡอᯕ۵יᖁ᮹ႊ⨆ŝḡᩎᨱ঑௝

ḲᵲශᮥǍ⧩ʑভྙᨱbᩎᯕӹᩎeǍe᮹Ḳᵲශᮥ⇵ᱶ⦹۵ ߑ ⦽ĥa ᯩ݅.

Korea Rail Network Authority(2010a) ᨱᕽ۵Ųᩎ℁ࠥ᮹30 ᇥe᜚~Ḳᵲශᮥ3aḡಽᇥඹ⦹ᩍƱ᫙ᨦྕḡǍᨱ10%, ᔢᨦ ḡǍᨱ5 ~ 9%, ⓑክঊᩑđၰ⪹᜚Ǎᨱ15 ~ 20%ಽᱽ᜽⦹Ł

ᯩ݅. ⦹ḡอ ᇥඹ ʑᵡᯕ ໦⪶⯩ ᱽ᜽ࡹᨕ ᯩḡ ᦫŁ, Ḳᵲශ

ੱ⦽✚ᱶ sᯕ ᦥܭჵ᭥sᮝಽอ ᱽ᜽ࡹᨕ ᩑǍᯱaə sᮥ

ᱢᬊ⦹۵ߑᨕಅᬡᯕᯩ݅. ੱ⦽Ųᩎ℁ࠥᨱݡ⧕ᕽอ℉ࢱ᜽e

Ḳᵲශᮥ݅൉Łᯩʑভྙᨱࠥ᜽℁ࠥᨱᱢᬊ⦹۵ߑᨱ⦽ĥa

ᯩ݅.

ᖁ⧪ᩑǍᔍಡᨱᕽᔕ⠕ᅕᦹॐᯕ, ℁ࠥᙹ݉᮹℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශ ᨱš⦽ᩑǍ۵ๅᬑᇡ᳒⦽ᝅᱶᯕ݅. ✚⯩, יᖁႊ⨆ᯕӹ᫵ᯝŝ

zᮡ ᯙ᭥ᱢᯙ Ǎᇥᨱ ঑௝ Ñ᜽ᱢᯙ sᮝಽ ᱽŖࡹʑ ভྙᨱ, ᝁȽᩎᔍ᜽ᖅᨱḢᱲᱢᮝಽᱢᬊ⦹ʑᨕಖ݅۵⦽ĥෝw۵݅.

ᯕᨱᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵bࠥ᜽℁ࠥᩎᔍᄥ᜚⦹₉ᯕᬊ~᮹✚ᖒŝ

ᩎᖙǭ᮹☁ḡᯕᬊ✚ᖒᮥŁಅ⦹ᩍ᫵ᯙᇥᕾŝǑḲᇥᕾᮥ⪽ᬊ, bb᮹ᩎᔍᄥ✚ᖒᮥŁಅ⦽℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᮥᔑ⇽⦹۵ႊჶು

ᮥᱽ᜽⧉ᮝಽ៉ᝁȽᩎᔍ᜽ᖅ᮹ᖅĥၰᬕᩢ᮹ɝÑෝษಉ⦹Ł

ᯱ ⦽݅.

2.2 ۗ࣡߆ंজଲߨࢫւߛ઴֜

bࠥ᜽℁ࠥᩎ᮹☖⧪✚ᖒᮡᅖᙹ᮹᫵ᗭॅಽᇡ░ၽᔾ⦹۵

äᯕအಽᯕෝ޵⧊ญᱢᮝಽᯕ⧕⦹Łᇥᕾ⦹ʑ᭥⧕ᕽ۵݅ᄡప ᇥᕾᯕ⦥᫵⦹݅. ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ᩍ్݅ᄡపᇥᕾႊჶುᵲᩍ్

᫵ᗭॅe᮹šĥෝ❭ᦦ⦹۵ߑᬊᯕ⦽ ᫵ᯙᇥᕾŝǑḲᇥᕾᮥ

ᱢᬊ⦹Łᯱ ⦽݅.

᫵ᯙᇥᕾᯕ௡ᩍ్}᮹ᄡᙹॅᯕᕽಽᨕਜíᩑđࡹᨕᯩ۵

aෝᇥᕾ⦹ᩍᯕॅᄡᙹe᮹šĥෝŖ࠺᫵ᯙᮝಽᖅ໦⦹۵ᇥᕾ

ʑჶᯕ݅(Hair et al., 1987). ᯕ۵᫵ᯙᮥ⇵⇽⦹۵ŝᱶŝ᫵ᯙ⧪

಍ᮥ⫭ᱥ᜽⍽᫵ᯙᇡ⦹పᮥ᳑ᱩ⦹۵ŝᱶᮝಽǍᖒࡽ݅. ᇥᕾᮥ

᭥⦽ ᫵ᯙᮥ ⇵⇽⦹۵ ႊჶᨱ ঑௝ Ⓧí ᵝᖒᇥᇥᕾ(principle component analysis)ŝŖ☖᫵ᯙᇥᕾ(common factor analysis) ಽӹ٭ᙹᯩ۵ߑ, ᯕᵲᵝᖒᇥᇥᕾᮡ݅᧲⦽ᄡᙹॅ᮹šĥෝ

Łಅ⦹ᩍᯕෝaᰆฯᯕᖅ໦⧁ᙹᯩ۵ᗭᙹ᮹᫵ᯙᮥ⇵⇽⦹Łᯱ

⧁ ভ ᔍᬊࡽ݅. ᫵ᯙᮥ ⇵⇽⦽ ݅ᮭ, ᫵ᯙ⧪಍ᮥ ⫭ᱥ᜽⍽ b

ᄡᙹॅᯕ✚ᱶ᫵ᯙᨱ۵׳ᮡ᫵ᯙᇡ⦹పᮡ, ݅ෙ᫵ᯙᨱ۵ԏᮡ

᫵ᯙᇡ⦹పᮥwࠥಾ⦽݅. ᫵ᯙ⧪಍ᮥ⫭ᱥ᜽┅۵ႊჶᨱ۵Ḣb

⫭ᱥႊჶŝ እḢb⫭ᱥႊჶᯕ ᯩ݅.

ǑḲᇥᕾᯕ௡ᄡᙹॅᯕw۵݅᧲⦽✚ᖒॅᮥᮁᔍᖒ(similarity)

ᮥʑᵡᮝಽ⦹ᩍእ᜘⦽✚ᖒᮥw۵ݡᔢॅᮥ࠺ᯝ⦽Ḳ݉ᮝಽ

ྗ۵ႊჶᯕ݅(Kim and Jhun, 1990). ǑḲᇥᕾᮡǑḲ⪵ႊჶᨱ

঑௝ĥ⊖ᱢ(hierarchical) ǑḲ⪵ႊჶŝእĥ⊖ᱢ(non-hierarchial) ǑḲ⪵ ႊჶᮝಽ ӹڽ݅. ĥ⊖ᱢ ǑḲ⪵ ႊჶᮡ ᮁᔍࠥa aᰆ

ⓑݡᔢॅᮥ₉ಡಽྗᨕӹaÑӹᮁᔍࠥaaᰆ᯲ᮡݡᔢॅᮥ

(4)

Table 1. Variables Setting

Classification Name of variable (abbreviation) Calculating method

Passenger demand pattern

Average daily number of passengers (AD) ć

ÐÓÒ

­ƍƒſƊƎſƑƑƃƌƅƃƐ Percentage for the number of passengers

in the morning peak hours (MP) ć ©ſƑƑƃƌƅƃƐƑƇƌƋƍƐƇƌƅƎƃſƉƆƍƓƐƑÝ Î×× ­ƍƒſƊƎſƑƑƃƌƅƃƐ Percentage for the number of passengers

in the afternoon peak hours (AP) ©ſƑƑƃƌƅƃƐƑƇƌſƄƒƃƐƌƍƍƌƎƃſƉƆƍƓƐƑÝ Î×× ­ƍƒſƊƎſƑƑƃƌƅƃƐ Percentage for the number of passengers

in the non-peak hours (NP) ć ©ſƑƑƃƌƅƃƐƑƇƌƌƍƌà ƎƃſƉƆƍƓƐƑÝ Î×× ­ƍƒſƊƎſƑƑƃƌƅƃƐ Percentage for the number

of boarding passengers (NBP) ć ›ƍſƐƂƇƌƅƎſƑƑƃƌƅƃƐ Ý Î×× ­ƍƒſƊƎſƑƑƃƌƅƃƐ

Land use inventory

Residential LQ Index (R-LQ)

ć ­ƆƃſƐƃſƍƄƃſƁƆƓƑƃƇƌ¬ƃƍƓƊ ­ƆƃƅƐƍƑƑſƐƃſƇƌ¬ƃƍƓƊ

­ƆƃƅƐƍƑƑſƐƃſƇƌƑƒſƒƇƍƌƇƌƄƊƓƃƌƁƃſƐƃſ

­ƆƃſƐƃſƍƄƃſƁƆƓƑƃƇƌƑƒſƒƇƍƌƇƌƄƊƓƃƌƁƃſƐƃſ Commercial LQ Index (C-LQ)

Business LQ Index (B-LQ)

₉ಡಽᱽÑ⧕ӹa۵ႊ᜾ᮝಽǑḲᯕ⩶ᖒࡹ۵ŝᱶᮥ❭ᦦ⦹ʑ

ᬊᯕ⦹ḡอ, ᯱഭ᮹ᙹaḡӹ⊹íฯᮝ໕ᇥᕾ⦹ʑᨕಅᬕ݉ᱱᯕ

ᯩ݅.

ᯕᨱእ⧕እĥ⊖ᱢǑḲ⪵ႊჶᮡǑḲ᮹}ᙹෝၙญᱶ⦹Ł

ǑḲ᮹ᵲᝍᨱaᰆᮁᔍ⦽✚ᖒᮥw۵ݡᔢᮥ₉ಡಽ⡍⧉⧕ӹa ۵ႊ᜾ᮝಽᯱഭ᮹ᙹaฯᮥĞᬑ዁෕Łᛞíᇥඹ⧁ᙹᯩᮝӹ

ǑḲ⩶ᖒ᜽Ⅹʑsᨱ঑௝đŝaᔢᯕ⦽݉ᱱᯕᯩ݅. ĥ⊖ᱢ

ǑḲ⪵ႊჶᨱ۵ݡᔢe᮹Ñญෝᔑᱶ⦹۵ʑᵡᨱ঑௝݉ᯝᩑđ ჶ, ⠪Ɂᩑđჶ, ᵲᝍᩑđჶ, ີॵᦩᩑđჶ, ᪥ᱥᩑđჶ, ᪡ऽႊჶ

॒ᯕ ᯩ݅.

ᯕ᪡ zᮡ ᫵ᯙᇥᕾ ၰ ǑḲᇥᕾᮡ ࠥ᜽ĥ⫮ ᇥ᧝ᨱᕽ ฯᯕ

ಽ18}ᄡᙹෝᔍᬊ⦹ᩍ4}᮹᫵ᯙᮥ⇵⇽, ǑḲᇥᕾᮥ☖⧕

6}᮹ǑḲᮝಽᱥℕḡᩎᮥᇥඹ⦹ᩡ݅. Song and Chang(2010)

ᮡᔍ⫭ྙ⪵ᱢ᫵ᗭၰྜྷญᱢ᫵ᗭ᪡šಉࡽ10}᮹ᄡᙹෝ☖⧕

᫵ᯙᇥᕾᮝಽ 4}᮹ ᫵ᯙᮥ ⇵⇽⦹ᩍ ǑḲᇥᕾᮥ ☖⧕ ᙹࠥǭ

ࠥ᜽ॅᮥ5}᮹ǑḲᮝಽᇥඹ⦹ᩡ݅. Lee et al.(2012)ᮡ9}᮹

ᔢᨦḡᩎ᮹ትಾᄥᔢᨦ⪵ᮉၰ⠪Ɂᩑ໕ᱢ॒9}᮹ᄡᙹॅᮥ

ࠥ⇽⦹ᩍ᫵ᯙᇥᕾᮥ☖⦽2aḡ᫵ᯙᮥ⇵⇽, ᯕෝ݅᜽ǑḲᇥᕾ

ᮥ ☖⧕ Ğʑࠥ ᔢᨦḡᩎᮥ 5aḡ ᮁ⩶ᮝಽ ᇥඹ⦹ᩡ݅.

Choi et al.(2007) ᮡŁᗮࠥಽ᮹ᮁ⩶ᄥಽᖅĥ᫵ᗭa₉ᄥࡹᨕ

᧝⦽݅۵ᱱᨱɝÑ⦹ᩍŁᗮࠥಽ᜽eƱ☖ప᮹AADT, ᄡ࠺ĥᙹ,

᪽ࠥĥᙹ॒᮹7aḡᄡᙹෝ☖⦹ᩍ᫵ᯙᇥᕾᮥ☖⧕2aḡ᫵ᯙᮥ

⇵⇽, ᱥǎ᮹Łᗮࠥಽෝ5aḡᮁ⩶ᮝಽᇥඹ⦹ᩡ݅. ᯕ᪡zᯕ

᫵ᯙᇥᕾŝǑḲᇥᕾᮥᙽ₉ᱢᮝಽᙹ⧪⦹ᩍᱥℕḡᩎᮥ✚ᱶᮁ

⩶ᨱ঑௝໨aḡǑḲॅಽᇥඹ⧁ᙹᯩ݅. ᯕ᪡zᮡᩑǍॅᨱᕽ ۵, ᯝၹᱢᮝಽᄡᙹᖁᱶ᮹᪅ඹෝ↽ᗭ⪵⦹ʑ᭥⧕ᕽ᫵ᯙᇥᕾᮥ

☖⦹ᩍ ᄡᙹॅ e᮹ ᵲᅖᇡᇥᮥ ᱽÑ⦽ ᫵ᯙᱱᙹෝ ࠥ⇽⦽ अ, ᯕෝ ǑḲᇥᕾ᮹ ᖅ໦ᄡᙹಽ ᔍᬊ⦹ᩡ݅.

3. ᇥᕾᯱഭ

bᩎᔍᄥ✚ᖒᮥӹ┡ԕʑ᭥⧕5aḡ᜚~ᙹ᫵➉▕šಉᄡᙹ

᪡4aḡ☁ḡᯕᬊšಉᄡᙹෝᔑ⇽⦹ᩡ݅. ᜚~ᙹ᫵➉▕šಉᄡ ᙹ۵⩥ᰍbᩎᔍෝᯕᬊ⦹۵᜚~ᙹ᫵➉▕᮹✚ᖒᮥӹ┡ԕʑ

᭥⧕ᔑ⇽⦹ᩡŁ, ☁ḡᯕᬊᄡᙹ۵ə൚ᄥᇥඹෝᰆ௹ᨱᱢᬊ⦹ʑ

᭥⧕LQḡᙹಽᙹ⊹⪵⦹ᩍᔑ⇽⦹ᩡ݅. ᄡᙹᨱš⦽ᖅ໦ᮡTable 1 ᨱᱽ᜽ࡹᨕᯩ݅. ᔑ⇽ࡽ9aḡᄡᙹෝ☖⧕᫵ᯙᇥᕾᵲᵝᖒᇥᇥ ᕾᮥᝅ᜽⦹ᩍᵝ᫵᫵ᯙॅᮥᎲᦥԕŁ, ᯕෝ☖⧕ᇡᩍࡽ᫵ᯙᇡ⦹

పᮥaḡŁĥ⊖ᱢǑḲᇥᕾᮥᝅ᜽⦹ᩍᮁᔍ⦽✚ᖒᮥӹ┡ԕ۵

ᩎॅᮥə൚ᮝಽ ྗᮡ ݅ᮭb ə൚ᨱ ⧕ݚ⦹۵ᩎᮥ ᯕᬊ⦹۵

ᯙᬱᙹෝ ᜽eݡᄥಽ ⧊ᔑ⦹ᩍ ℉ࢱ᜽e Ḳᵲශᮥ ᔑᱶ⦽݅.

5aḡ᮹᜚~ᙹ᫵➉▕šಉᄡᙹᵲ, ᯝ⠪Ɂ᜚~ᙹ۵ᩎᔍᄥ ಽᔍ௭ॅᯕฯᯕᯕᬊ⦹۵ᩎŝᱢíᯕᬊ⦹۵ᩎ᮹₉ᯕෝӹ┡

ԕʑ᭥⦹ᩍᔑ⇽⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ᪅ᱥ℉ࢱ᜽eݡ(07:00~09:00), ᪅⬥

℉ࢱ᜽eݡ(18:00~20:00) ၰእ℉ࢱ᜽eݡ(05:00~07:00, 09:00

~18:00, 20:00~01:00)ෝᖅᱶ⦹ᩍb᜽eݡᄥᨕ۱ᱶࠥእᮉಽ

ᔍ௭ॅᯕᯕᬊ⦹۵ḡ᦭ᦥᅕʑ᭥⧕ᔑ⇽⦹ᩡ݅. ᜚₉᜚~ᙹእᮉ

ᮡbᩎᔍෝᯕᬊ⦹۵᜚⦹₉ᯙᬱᵲᨱᕽ᜚₉⦹۵ᯙᬱ᮹እᮉಽ

ᯕᬊ~ᵲ᜚₉ᯙᬱŝ⦹₉ᯙᬱ᮹✚Ḷᮥ᦭ᦥᅕʑ᭥⦹ᩍᱢᬊ⦹

ᩡ݅. ᩎᖙǭ᮹☁ḡᯕᬊŝšಉࡽ4aḡᄡᙹ۵ᵝÑ, ᔢᨦ, ᨦྕ, ʑ┡ᬊࠥᄥLQḡᙹಽᕽbᩎᖙǭ᮹☁ḡᯕᬊ✚ᖒᮥ❭ᦦ⦹ʑ

᭥⧕ ᔑ⇽⦹ᩡ݅.

(5)

Table 2. Factor Scores of Three Factors

Variables Factor 1 Factor 2 Factor 3

R-LQ 0.729 0.164 -0.067

MP 0.709 -0.023 0.423

NBP 0.514 0.362 0.231

C-LQ 0.114 0.630 0.372

Rs-LQ 0.303 0.527 0.320

NP 0.078 0.631 0.203

B-LQ -0.163 0.237 0.814

AP 0,205 0.241 0.632

AD -0.062 0.353 0.868

Individual amount

for explanation (%) 44.83 24.61 11.16 Accumulation

amount for explanation (%)

44.83 69.44 80.60

4. ႊჶುǍ⇶

4.1 ૬଴ंজ

ⅾ213}᮹ᩎᨱݡ⦹ᩍᄡᙹෝᖅᱶ, ᯕᵲ200}ᩎᮥݡᔢᮝಽ

ᇥᕾᮥᝅ᜽⦹ᩡŁ, 13}᮹ᩎᮡđŝá᷾ᨱᱢᬊ⦹ᩡ݅. 13}᮹

ᩎᮡ݉ᙽᯥ᮹⢽ᅙ⇵⇽(simple random sampling) ႊჶᮥ☖⧕

⇵⇽⦹ᩡ݅. 200}ᩎ᮹ᄡᙹsᨱݡ⦽ᵝᖒᇥᇥᕾᮥᝅ᜽⦹ᩡ݅.

ᦿᕽᨙɪ⦽ၵ᪡zᯕ, ᫵ᯙ⧪಍᮹⧕ᕾᮥ᳡޵ᬊᯕ⦹í⦹ʑ

᭥⧕ḢƱ⫭ᱥႊჶᵲᄁญๆᜅჶᮥᯕᬊ⦹ᩍ⫭ᱥ᜽⎑݅. ᫵ᯙᇥ ᕾ᮹┡ݚᖒᮥ⪶ᯙ⦹ʑ᭥⧕Kaiser-Meyer-Oklin(KMO) áᱶŝ

Bartlett ᮹Ǎ⩶ᖒáᱶᮥᝅ᜽⦹ᩡ݅. áᱶđŝKMO sᯕ0.613 ᮝಽᇥᕾᨱᱢ⧊⦽äᮝಽ❱໦ࡹᨩŁ, Bartlett᮹Ǎ⩶ᖒáᱶ

đŝᩎ᜽ᮁ᮹⪶ශᯕ0.000ᮝಽᄡᙹॅᯕᇥᕾᨱᱢᱩ⦽äᮝಽ

ӹ┡ԍ݅.

ᱢᱶ᫵ᯙ᮹ᙹෝđᱶ⦹۵ߑᯩᨕᜅⓍญࠥ⢽ෝᯕᬊ⦹ᩡ۵ߑ,

᫵ᯙ᮹Łᮁsᯕ1.0ᯕᔢᯕࡹ۵᫵ᯙॅᯕ⇵⇽ᨱᱢᱩ⦽⬥ᅕa

ࢁᙹᯩ݅. b᫵ᯙॅᮡᄡᙹᨱݡ⧕ᇡ⦹ప(factor score)ᮥaḡ໑, ᯕ۵ᨕਅ᫵ᯙॅᯕᨕਅᄡᙹॅŝaᰆฯᮡšĥෝaḡŁᯩ۵ḡ

᦭ ᙹ ᯩ۵ ĥᙹಽᕽ, ĥᙹs ᱽŒ᮹ ႒ᇥᮉᮡ ə ᫵ᯙᨱ ᮹⧕

ᖅ໦ࡹ۵ ᄡᙹ᮹ ᇥᔑ᮹ እᮉᮥ ӹ┡ԙ݅.

᫵ᯙᇥᕾđŝFig. 2᪡zᯕ᫵ᯙ᮹Łᮁsᯕ1.0 ᯕᔢᯕࡹ۵

3}᮹ᯙᯱॅᯕ⇵⇽ࡹᨩŁᱥℕᯱഭᨱݡ⦹ᩍ80.60%᮹ᖅ໦ಆ

ᮥw۵äᮝಽӹ┡ԍ݅. ᱽ1ᯙᯱ۵ᱥℕᄡ࠺᮹44.83%ෝᖅ໦⦹

໑, ᵝÑLQḡᙹ, ᪅ᱥ℉ࢱ᜽e᜚~እᮉ, ᜚₉᜚~ᙹእᮉŝᩑš ᖒᯕ׳ᮡäᮝಽᇥᕾࡹᨩ݅. ᯕ۵ᵝÑḡᩎᨱ᭥⊹⦽ࠥ᜽℁ࠥᩎ ᯕ᪅ᱥ℉ࢱ᜽eݡᨱ☖ɝၰ☖⦺☖⧪ᮝಽᯙ⦹ᩍ׳ᮡ℉ࢱ᜽e

Ḳᵲශᮥӹ┡ԙ݅۵ᱱᮥŁಅ⧁ভ, ᱽ1ᯙᯱ۵ᵝÑ✚ᖒᯕv⦽

ḡᩎᨱ ᭥⊹⦽ ࠥ᜽℁ࠥᩎॅ᮹ ᗮᖒᮝಽ ᅝ ᙹ ᯩ݅.

ᱽ2ᯙᯱ۵ᱥℕᄡ࠺᮹24.61%ෝᖅ໦⦹໑, ᔢᨦLQḡᙹ, ʑ┡

LQḡᙹၰእ℉ࢱ᜽e᜚~እᮉᨱᕽ׳ᮡ᧲᮹ᇡ⦹పᮥӹ┡ԙ݅.

እ℉ࢱ᜽eݡ᮹ࠥ᜽℁ࠥᩎᯕᬊእᮉᮡᔢᨦḡᩎŝʑ┡ḡᩎ(Ŗ Ŗ᜽ᖅ, šŲ⮕í᜽ᖅ ၰ ᯱ࠺₉ šಉ᜽ᖅ ⡍⧉ḡᩎ)ᨱᕽ ׳ᮡ

sᮥ aḥ݅. ᯕ⃹ౝ ᱽ2ᯙᯱ۵ ʑ┡ḡᩎᮥ ⡍⧉⦽ ᔢᨦ✚ᖒᯕ

v⦽ ḡᩎᨱ ᭥⊹⦽ ࠥ᜽℁ࠥᩎॅ᮹ ᗮᖒᮝಽ ❱݉ࡽ݅.

ᱽ3ᯙᯱ۵ᱥℕᄡ࠺᮹11.16%ෝᖅ໦⦹໑, ᨦྕLQḡᙹၰ

᪅⬥℉ࢱ᜽e᜚~እᮉŝᯝ⠪Ɂ᜚~ᙹ᪡׳ᮡᩑšᖒᮥaḡ۵

äᮝಽ ӹ┡ԍ݅. ᨦྕḡᩎᨱ ᭥⊹⦽ ࠥ᜽℁ࠥᩎᮡ ᯝၹᱢᮝಽ

᪅⬥℉ࢱ᜽eݡᨱ♕ɝ⦹۵᜚~ᙹ᫵እᮉᯕ׳ʑভྙᨱ, ᱽ3ᯙᯱ

۵ᨦྕ✚ᖒᯕv⦽ḡᩎᨱ᭥⊹⦽ࠥ᜽℁ࠥᩎॅ᮹ᗮᖒᮝಽŁಅ

ࡽ݅. ᯱᖙ⦽ᄡᙹᄥbᯙᯱᨱݡ⦽ᇡ⦹పᮡTable 2᪡z݅.

4.2 ֞ுंজէր

3 }᮹ᯙᯱᨱݡ⦽bᩎॅᯕaḡ۵ᯙᯱाᱱᮥᯕᬊ⦹ᩍ᪡ऽ ᮹ႊჶᮥ☖⦽ĥ⊖ᱢǑḲᇥᕾᮥᝅ᜽⦹ᩡ݅. ᇥᕾđŝᔑ⇽ࡽ

▱ऽಽəఉᮥၵ┶ᮝಽə൚}ᙹ᮹ᄡ⪵ᨱ঑ෙPseudo-F ☖ĥప ᮹ᄡ⪵ෝšₑ⦹ᩡ݅. ᯕ۵ə൚e᮹ᇥญᱶࠥෝ⊂ᱶ⦹۵ႊჶᮝ ಽ, ǑḲᇥᕾᨱᕽ۵ə൚}ᙹ᮹᷾a⧁ভPseudo-F ☖ĥపᯕ

ɪĊ⦹í ⍅ḡ۵ ḡᱱᨱ ݡ᮲ࡹ۵ ə൚᮹ }ᙹෝ ᱢᱶ ə൚᮹

ᙹಽ ᱶ⧁ ᙹ ᯩ݅.

እƱđŝə൚᮹}ᙹa3}ᯝভPseudo-F ☖ĥపᯕaᰆ

ɪĊ⦹í᷾a⦹အಽə൚᮹}ᙹ۵3}aᱢᱩ⦽äᮝಽ❱݉⦹ᩡ

݅. ǑḲᇥᕾ đŝ b ə൚ᄥ ⧕ݚ ᩎᮡ Table 3ŝ z݅.

ə൚1ᨱᗮ⦽ᩎॅᮡ94}ಽaᰆฯŁ, ⠪Ɂᱢᮝಽᱽ1ᯙᯱᨱ

ݡ⦽ᯙᯱाᱱᯕ݅ෙə൚ᨱእ⧕׳ᮡ᧲᮹sᮥӹ┡ԕŁᯩᨕ

(6)

Table 3. Station Names of Each Group Groups

(number) Stations

Group1 (94)

Gangnam-Gu Office, Gangdong, Gang-dong-Gu Office, Gaerong, Gaehwasan, Geoyeo, Gongdeok, Gongneung, Gwang-naru, Gwangheungchang, Gusan, Gu-ui, Gupabal, Gireum, Kkachisan, Nakseongdae, Namguro, Namssong, Namtaeryeong, Nokbeon, Noksapyeong, Dapsimni, Danggogae, Daheung, Dogok, Dorimcheon, Dobongsan, Dokbawi, Dunchon-dong, Digital Media City, Ttukseom, Madeul, Majang, Macheon, Mapo-Gu Office, Mangwon, Maebong, Meokgol, Myeongil, Mongchontoseong, Mullae, Bangbae, Bangi, Banghwa, Beotigogae, Boramae, Bomun, Bokjeong, Bongcheon, Bonghwasan, Sangdo, Sangwangsimni, Sangwolgok, Seodaemun, Seokgae, Seokchon, Seongsu, Singil, Sindaebang, Sindaebang samgeori, Sinjeong, Sincheon, Sinpung, Amsa, Aeogae, Yangpyeong, Yeokchon, Yeongdeungpo-gu Office, Ogeum, Omokgyo, Onsu, Yongmasan, Ujangsan, Wolgok, Ilwon, Jamsilnaru, Jamwon, Jangseungbagi, Junggye, Junghwa, Jeungsan, Changsin, Chunwang, Chunggu, Chungdam, Taereung, Hakdong, Hangdang, Hwagok, Hwarangdae, Hyochang park

Group2 (73)

Konkuk Univ,, Godeok, Korea Univ., Express Bus Terminal, Seoul National Univ, of Education, Gunja, Gubeundari, Geumho, Gil-dong, Naebang, Nowon, Daerim, Dongnimmun, Dongdaemun history and culture park, Dongguk Univ., Dongmyo, Dongjak, Daechi, Ttukseom Resort, Mok-dong, Mia, Balsan, Bulkwang, Sagajeong, Samgakji, Sanggye, Sangbong, Sangsu, Saejeol, Seoul National Univ., Sungsin Univ., Songjeong, Suraksan, Suyu, Sukmyong Univ., Sungsil Univ., Singeumho, Sindang, Sinyongsan, Singjeongmegeori, Sinchon, Ssangmun, Achasan, Ahyun, Anam, Apgujeong, Yaksu, Yangcheon-gu Office, Children‘s Grand Park,Yeongdeungpo Market, Oksu, Olympic Park, Wangsimni, Yongdu, Worldcup Stadium, Eungam, Itaewon, Jamsil, Jangji, Janghanpyung, Sports Complex, Chang-dong, Chunho, Hagye, Hakyeoul, Hangangjin, Hansung Univ., Hanyang Univ., Hyehwa, Hongik Univ., Honjae

Group3 (33)

Gasan Digital Complex, Gangnam, Gyeongbokgung, Gwanghwamun, Guro Digital Complex, Nambu Bus Terminal, Nonhyeon, Dangsan, Mapo, Myeong-dong, Sadang, Seocho, Sunneung, City Hall, Singdorim, Sinsul- dong, Anguk, Yangjae, Yeouinaru, Yeouido, Yeoksam, Euljiro 3-ga, Euljiro 4-ga, Euljiro 1-ga, Isu, Jonggak, Jongno 3-ga, Jongno 5-ga, Chungmuro, Chungjeongro,

Table 4. Average Factor Scores of Each Group

Groups Factor 1 Factor 2 Factor 3

Group 1 1.34 -0.72 -1.56

Group 2 -0.93 0.81 1.15

Group 3 -1.76 0.26 1.90

Table 5. Land Use Inventory of Each Group

Groups R-LQ C-LQ B-LQ Rs-LQ

Group 1 1.05 0.90 0.53 0.82

Group 2 0.68 1.52 1.34 1.26

Group 3 0.37 1.28 2.48 1.05

Average 0.80 1.19 1.15 1.02

Table 6. Demand Pattern of Each Group

Groups MP NP AP NBP AD

(/10

3

) Group 1 19.84 64.43 15.70 51.29 25.40 Group 2 13.82 69.93 16.20 50.08 57.16 Group 3 17.54 65.41 17.17 49.31 96.95 ᵝÑ✚ᖒᯕ v⦽ ḡᩎᨱ ᗮ⦽ ᩎॅᯕ௝Ł ⧁ ᙹ ᯩ݅. ə൚2ᨱ

ᗮ⦽ᩎॅᮡ73}ಽᱽ2ᯙᯱᨱݡ⦹ᩍ׳ᮡᯙᯱाᱱᮥaḡ۵

äᮝಽӹ┡ԍŁ, ᩎᔍ᮹᭥⊹ෝŁಅ⧁ভᔢᨦ✚ᖒᯕv⦽ḡᩎᨱ

ᗮ⦽ᩎॅᯙäᮝಽᇥඹ⧁ᙹᯩ݅. ə൚3ᨱ۵33}᮹ᩎᯕᗮ⧕

ᯩᮝ໑, ݅ෙə൚ᨱእ⧕ᱽ3ᯙᯱᨱݡ⦹ᩍ׳ᮡᯙᯱाᱱᮥaḥ

݅. ᩎᔍॅᯕ ੱ⦽ ݡᇡᇥᯕ ࠥᝍḡᩎᨱ ᭥⊹⦹۵ ᱱᮥ Łಅ⧁

ভᨦྕḡᩎ✚ᖒᯕv⦽ḡᩎᨱᗮ⦽ᩎॅᯙäᮝಽ❱݉ࡽ݅.

Table 4۵ Ǎℕᱢᯙ ə൚ᄥ ⠪Ɂ ᯙᯱाᱱᮥ ӹ┡ԙ݅.

ǑḲᇥᕾ đŝ ᇥඹࡽ ə൚ ᄥಽ 9}᮹ ᄡᙹᨱ ݡ⦽ ✚ᖒᮥ

ᔕ⠕ᅕᦹ݅. ຝᱡ☁ḡᯕᬊ✚ᖒ᮹Ğᬑ(Table 5), ə൚1ᨱᗮ⦽

ᩎॅᮡ݅ෙə൚ᨱᗮ⦽ᩎॅᨱእ⧕ᔢݡᱢᮝಽ׳ᮡᵝÑLQḡᙹ

sᮥw۵äᮝಽӹ┡ԍ݅. ə൚2ᨱᗮ⦽ᩎॅ᮹Ğᬑ, ݅ෙə൚ᨱ

ᗮ⦽ᩎॅᨱእ⧕ᔢᨦLQḡᙹ᪡ʑ┡LQḡᙹa׳ᮡäᮝಽӹ┡

ԍŁ, ə൚3ᨱᗮ⦽ᩎॅᮡᨦྕLQḡᙹa׳ᮡäᮝಽӹ┡ԍ݅.

঑௝ᕽᦿᕽั⦽ə൚1ᮡᵝÑ✚ᖒᯕv⦽ḡᩎᨱ᭥⊹⦽ᩎॅᯕ Ł, ə൚2۵ᔢᨦ✚ᖒᯕv⦽ḡᩎᨱ᭥⊹⦽ᩎॅᯕ໑, ə൚3ᮡ

ᨦྕ✚ᖒᯕv⦽ḡᩎᨱᗮ⦽ᩎॅᯕ௝۵đುᮡ┡ݚ⦽äᮝಽ

❱݉ࡽ݅.

݅ᮭᮝಽ᜚~ᙹ᫵➉▕✚ᖒᨱݡ⦹ᩍᔕ⠕ᅕ໕, ə൚1ᨱᗮ⦽

ᩎॅᮡ᪅ᱥ℉ࢱ᜽eݡ᮹እᮉŝ᜚₉᜚~ᙹእᮉᨱᕽ݅ෙə൚ ᨱእ⧕׳ᮡsᮥӹ┡ԩŁ, እ℉ࢱ᜽eݡእᮉŝᯝ⠪Ɂ᜚~ᙹᨱ ᕽԏᮡsᮥӹ┡ԩ݅(Table 6). ə൚2ᨱᗮ⦽ᩎॅᮡእ℉ࢱ᜽e ݡእᮉᨱᕽ׳ᮡsᮥaḡ໑, ᪅ᱥŝ᪅⬥℉ࢱ᜽eݡእᮉᨱᕽ

aᰆԏᮡsᮥӹ┡ԩ݅. ə൚3ᮡ᪅⬥℉ࢱ᜽eݡእᮉŝᯝ⠪Ɂ

᜚~ᙹᨱᕽ ׳ᮡ sᮥ ӹ┡ԩ݅.

(7)

Table 7. Peak-hour Ratio of Each Group

Groups Peak hour ratio (%)

Group 1 12.10

Group 2 8.45

Group 3 10.76

Average 10.48

Table 8. Homogeneity Test of Each Variable (Group1 vs. Others)

Variable

Levene’s test

(variance) t-test (mean)

F-value

t-value equality of variances

O

equality of variances X

R-LQ 11.454 7.611 7.787

C-LQ 12.221 -5.918 -6.070

B-LQ 54.937 -6.386 -6.650

Rs-LQ 0.790 -1.215 -1.184

AD 96.512 -8.058 -8.477

Table 9. Homogeneity Test of Each Variable (Group2 vs. Group3)

Variable

Levene’s test

(variance) t-test (mean)

F-value

t-value equality of variances

O

equality of variances X

R-LQ 3.136 4.868 5.314

C-LQ 3.869 0.565 0.635

B-LQ 15.554 -10.092 -8.495

Rs-LQ 0.268 0.568 0.626

AD 2.204 -2.499 -2.443

Fig. 3. Box Plot on Average Number of Passengers (Group1 vs.

Others)

4.3 షܪਏԩுணࠔॺ୨

↽᳦ᱢᮝಽbə൚ᄥᩎॅ᮹ᯱഭෝ⧊ᔑ⦹ᩍ℉ࢱ1᜽e᮹

እᮉᮥ ᔑ⇽⦹ᩡ݅. ə đŝ ℉ࢱ᜽eᮡ ə൚1ŝ ə൚3᮹ Ğᬑ

᪅ᱥ8᜽ᨱᕽ9᜽ʭḡಽӹ┡ԍᮝ໑, ə൚1ᨱᕽ۵12.10%, ə൚3 ᨱᕽ۵10.76%᮹℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᮥw۵äᮝಽӹ┡ԍŁ, ə൚2 ᨱᕽ۵᪅⬥6᜽ᨱᕽ7᜽ʭḡ8.45%᮹℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᮥӹ┡ԕ ᨕᵝÑḡᩎᨱ᭥⊹⦽ᩎ᮹℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᯕᔢᨦḡᩎᨱ᭥⊹⦽

ᩎ᮹əäᨱእ⧕᧞4%ᱶࠥ׳ᮡäᮝಽᇥᕾࡹᨩ݅(Table 7).

4.4 ֻࠄ්ۥࢺ࣑ߨ

ᔩಽᬕᩎᔍෝᖅĥ⧁ভ, ᨕਅ℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශsᮥᔍᬊ⧁

äᯙḡෝᱶ⦹ʑ᭥⦹ᩍᨕਅŝᱶᮥÑℱᨕ۱ə൚ᨱ⧁ݚ⧁ḡ

đᱶ⦹۵ŝᱶᯕ⦥᫵⦹݅. ᩑǍđŝᔢݡᱢᮝಽӹນḡə൚ॅᨱ

እ⧕ᔢᯕ⦽✚Ḷᮥӹ┡ԙə൚1ᮥᬑᖁ⇵⇽⦹Ł, ᯕᨕᕽə൚2᪡

ə൚3ᮝಽᇥඹ⦹۵Ǎ᳑ෝᱢᬊ⦹ᩡ݅. ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽᔍᬊࡽ9aḡ

ᄡᙹᵲᨱᕽ, ᯝ⠪Ɂ᜚~ᙹ۵ᙹ᫵ᩩ⊂ᮥ☖⧕ᩩ⊂a܆⦹Ł4a ḡ☁ḡᯕᬊᄡᙹ۵ʑ᳕᮹☁ḡᯕᬊĥ⫮ᨱ঑௝ᔑ⇽ᯕa܆⦹݅.

ə൚⧁ݚႊჶು᮹ᱢᬊᮥᬊᯕ⦹íอॅʑ᭥⦹ᩍ3aḡǑḲᮝಽ

ᇥඹࡹ۵ŝᱶᨱᕽbb᮹ə൚᮹ᇥඹෝaᰆ᯹ӹ┡ԝᙹᯩ۵

ᄡᙹෝ⦹ӹᦊᖅᱶ⦹ᩡ݅. ຝᱡbə൚᮹ᇥඹŝᱶᨱᕽ5aḡ

ᄡᙹᨱ ঑ෙᇥඹ݉ĥ᮹ ࢱ ə൚ᨱݡ⦽ ⠪Ɂŝ ᇥᔑ᮹࠺ᯝᖒ

áᱶᮥᝅ᜽⦹ᩍ, ᇥඹŝᱶݡ⢽ᖅ໦ᄡᙹෝ⇵⇽⦹ᩡ݅. áᱶ᮹

đŝಽӹ᪅۵F-value᪡t-value sᯕⓕᙹಾ޵ԏᮡᮁ᮹ᙹᵡᨱ ᕽࠥȡྕaᖅᮥʑb⧁ᙹᯩᮝအಽᇥඹŝᱶᮥ޵᯹ӹ┡ԕ۵

ᄡᙹ௝ ⧁ ᙹ ᯩ݅.

঑௝ᕽTable 8ŝzᯕ, ə൚1ŝʑ┡ə൚ॅಽӹڹ۵ℌჩṙ

ᇥඹ݉ĥᨱᕽ۵F-value᪡t-valuesᯕaᰆⓑ‘ᯝ⠪Ɂ᜚~ᙹ’

ᄡᙹaə൚1᮹ᇥඹෝaᰆ᯹ᖅ໦⦹۵äᮝಽ❱݉⦹ᩡ݅. ੱ⦽

Table 9 ᨱᕽᅕॐᯕə൚2᪡ə൚3ᮝಽӹڹ۵ࢱჩṙᇥඹ݉ĥᨱ ᕽ۵ᩎ᜽F-value᪡t-value sᯕaᰆⓑ‘ᨦྕLQḡᙹ’ ᄡᙹa

ᇥඹŝᱶᮥ aᰆ ᯹ ᖅ໦⦹۵ äᮝಽ ❱݉⦹ᩡ݅.

ə൚⧁ݚŝᱶᨱᕽ᮹Ğĥsᮥᖅᱶ⦹ʑ᭥⦹ᩍBox Plotᮥ

ᯕᬊ⦹ᩡ݅. Fig. 3ŝFig. 4᮹ᔪᯕ⋁⧕ḥօ༉ᔢᯱᦩᨱ۵ᱥℕ

(8)

Fig. 5. Group Allocation Process

Table 10. Comparison of the Number of Passengers during One Peak-hour

Station (Group)

Experimental value

Standard guideline

(Error)

This research (Error) Gangbyeon

(2) 11,326 11,862

(+4.73%)

11,471 (+1.28%) Daecheong

(1) 3,613 2,529

(-30.00%)

3,505 (-2.99%) Myonmok

(1) 3,690 2,791

(-24.36%)

3,868 (+4.82%) Munjeong

(1) 1,341 947

(-29.38%)

1,312 (-2.16%) Mia-samgeori

(2) 8,309 7,799

(-6.14%)

7,541 (-9.24%) Banpo

(1) 1,360 1,129

(-16.99%)

1,566 (+15.15%) Samseong

(3) 19,554 15,871

(-18.84%)

19,520 (-0.17%) Songpa

(1) 1,711 1,245

(-27.24%)

1,726 (+0.88%) Suseo

(1) 3,475 2,495

(-28.20%)

3,458 (-0.49%) Ehwa Womans

Univ.

(2)

5,532 5,686

(+2.78%)

5,498 (-0.61%) Jegi-dong

(2) 5,014 5,156

(+2.83%)

4,986 (-0.56%) Junggok

(1) 2,650 1,860

(-29.81%)

2,578 (-2.72%) Cheong-ryangni

(2) 7,564 8,644

(+14.28%)

8,359 (+10.51%)

Total 75,139 68,014

(-9.48%)

75,388 (+0.33%)

ᯱഭ᮹1ᔍᇥ᭥ᨱᕽ3ᔍᇥ᭥ʭḡᯱഭ᮹ᵲᦺ50%aᗮ⦹۵ᩢᩎ ᯕ݅. ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ə൚ᇥඹ᮹ʑᵡsᮝಽ, ࢱə൚ᵲᔢݡᱢᮝ ಽԏᮡᄡᙹsᮥw۵ə൚᮹3ᔍᇥ᭥sŝ׳ᮡᄡᙹsᮥw۵

ə൚᮹ 1ᔍᇥ᭥s᮹ ᵲesᮥ ᖅᱶ⦹ᩡ݅.

Fig. 3 ᨱ঑෕໕, ᔢᯱᦩᨱᗮ⦹۵ə൚ᄥᯝ⠪Ɂ᜚~ᙹჵ᭥۵

ə൚1᮹Ğᬑ᧞15,000໦ᨱᕽ32,000໦ᱶࠥᯕŁʑ┡ə൚(ə൚2 + ə൚3)᮹Ğᬑ᧞40,000໦ᨱᕽ110,000໦ᱶࠥᯕ݅. ঑௝ᕽ

ℌჩṙ݉ĥᨱᕽᯝ⠪Ɂ᜚~ᙹᨱ঑ෙᇥඹ᮹Ğĥsᮥࢱə൚

Ğĥ᮹ ⠪Ɂsᯙ 36,000໦ᮝಽ ⦹ᩡ݅.

ə൚2᪡ə൚3ᮥǍᇥ⦽Fig. 4ᨱᕽᔢᯱᦩᨱᗮ⦹۵ə൚ᄥ

ᨦྕLQḡᙹჵ᭥۵ə൚2᮹Ğᬑ᧞0.4ᨱᕽ1.3ᯕŁə൚3᮹Ğᬑ

᧞2.2ᨱᕽ4.0ᯕ݅. ə్အಽᨦྕLQḡᙹᨱ঑ෙᇥඹ᮹Ğĥsᮡ

1.75 ಽ ᖅᱶ⦹ᩡ݅. ↽᳦ ə൚⧁ݚ ŝᱶᮡ Fig. 5᪡ z݅.

5. ႊჶು᮹á᷾

ᔩಽᬕࠥ᜽℁ࠥᩎᔍÕᖅ᜽℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᮡᝅ⊂ᯕᇩa܆

᜽eḲᵲශ8.78%ᮥaᰆฯᯕᱢᬊ⦹Łᯩ݅(Korea Development Institute, 2008).

ᅙᩑǍ᮹đŝෝá᷾⦹ʑ᭥⦹ᩍ, ᇥᕾᨱᦿᕽ݉ᙽᯥ᮹⢽ᅙ⇵

⇽(simple random sampling) ႊჶᮥ☖⧕⇵⇽ࡽ13}ᩎॅᮥݡ ᔢᮝಽbᩎ᮹ᯝ⠪Ɂ᜚⦹₉ᯙᬱᙹᨱᅙᩑǍᨱᕽᱽ᜽ࡽ℉ࢱ᜽

eḲᵲශŝ⢽ᵡḡ⋉ᨱᱽ᜽ࡽ℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᮥbbŒ⦹ᩍ

℉ࢱ᜽eᯙᬱᙹෝᔑ⇽⧉ᮝಽ៉ᝅᱽ⊂ᱶࡽ℉ࢱ᜽eᯙᬱᙹ᪡

á᷾đŝෝᔕ⠕ᅕ໕, ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽᱽ᜽ࡽđŝaᩩእ┡ݚᖒ᳑

ᔍ⢽ᵡḡ⋉ᨱእ⧕ᕽ᪅₉ᮉᯕ⭉ᦍ޵ᱢíӹ┡ӽäᮥ⪶ᯙ⧁

ᙹᯩ݅. ᩩእ┡ݚᖒ᳑ᔍ⢽ᵡḡ⋉᮹℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශsᮥᯝ⠪Ɂ

᜚~ᙹ᪡Œ⦹ᩍ℉ࢱ᜽e᜚~ᙹෝ⇵ᱶ⧕ᅕ໕, ᝅ⊂sŝᱢí۵

᧞2%ᨱᕽฯí۵᧞30%ʭḡ᮹᪅₉aၽᔾ⦹ᩡ݅. ᯕᨱእ⧕

ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽᔑ⇽ࡽ℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᮥ☖⧕℉ࢱ᜽e᜚~ᙹෝ

⇵ᱶ⧁Ğᬑ, ᱢí۵᧞0.5%ᨱᕽฯí۵15%ʭḡ᮹᪅₉aၽᔾ

⦹ᩡ݅.

✚⯩⢽ᵡḡ⋉᮹sᮥᱢᬊ⦽Ğᬑə൚1, ᷪᵝÑḡᩎ᮹ᩎᔍᨱ

ᱢᬊ⦹ᩡᮥভ᪅₉aⓍíၽᔾ⦹ᩡ۵ߑᯕෝ☖⧕ᩩእ┡ݚᖒ᳑

ᔍ ⢽ᵡḡ⋉᮹ ℉ࢱ᜽e Ḳᵲශ 8.78%a ᔢݡᱢᮝಽ ޵ ׳ᮡ

℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᮥӹ┡ԕ۵ᵝÑḡᩎ᮹ࠥ᜽℁ࠥᩎ᮹ᙹ᫵✚ᖒ

ᮥ ᱽݡಽ ၹᩢ⦹ḡ ༜⦽݅Ł ั⧁ ᙹ ᯩ݅. ঑௝ᕽ ᅙ ᩑǍ᮹

đŝ۵ḡ⋉ᨱᱽ᜽ࡽsᨱእƱ⦹ᩍ᳡޵⩥ᝅᮥᱶ⪶⦹íၹᩢ⦽

⧊ญᱢᯙ sᮥ ᱽ᜽⧩݅Ł ⠪a⧁ ᙹ ᯩ݅.

(9)

6. đುၰ⨆⬥ᩑǍŝᱽ

ᅙ ᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ ᫵ᯙᇥᕾ ၰ ǑḲᇥᕾ ʑჶᮥ ⪽ᬊ⦹ᩍ ᝁȽ

ᩎᔍᨱݡ⦽℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᮥᔑᱶ⦹۵ႊჶುᮥᱽ᜽⦹ᩡ݅.

ᯕෝ᭥⧕ᕽᬙ✚ᄥ᜽ෝݡᔢᮝಽࠥ᜽℁ࠥᩎᄥ24᜽e᜚⦹₉

ᯙᬱᙹ⊂ᱶᯱഭၰ ᙹ⊹ḡᱢࠥ᪡Õ⇶ྜྷݡᰆᯱഭෝၵ┶ᮝಽ

ᇥᕾᮥ ᝅ᜽⦹ᩡ݅. ᵝ᫵ ᩑǍđŝෝ ᫵᧞⦹໕ ݅ᮭŝ z݅.

ℌṙ, bᩎᄥ℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᨱšಉᯕᯩ۵᫵ᯙᮥ⇵⇽⦹ʑ

᭥⧕ᕽ5aḡ᜚~ᙹ᫵➉▕ᄡᙹ᪡4aḡ☁ḡᯕᬊᄡᙹෝᖅᱶ⦹

ᩡ݅. ࢹṙ, ᫵ᯙᇥᕾŝǑḲᇥᕾᮥᙹ⧪⦹ᩍᱥℕࠥ᜽℁ࠥᩎᮥ

3 }᮹ə൚ᮝಽᇥඹ⦹ᩡ݅. [ə൚1]ᮡᵝÑḡᩎ, [ə൚2]۵ᔢᨦḡ ᩎ, [ə൚3]ᮡᨦྕḡᩎ᮹✚ᖒᮥaḡŁᯩ۵äᮝಽ❱݉ࡽ݅.

ᖬṙ, ℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᮡᵝÑḡᩎᯕ12.10%, ᔢᨦḡᩎᯕ8.45%, ᨦྕḡᩎᯕ10.76% ᙹᵡᯙäᮝಽᇥᕾࡹᨩ݅. ֘ṙ, ᔩ೎íÕᖅ

ࡹ۵ ᩎᨱ ᱢᬊࢁ ℉ࢱ᜽e Ḳᵲශᮥ đᱶ⦹ʑ ᭥⧕ᕽ ‘ᯝ⠪Ɂ

᜚~ᙹ’᪡‘ᨦྕLQḡᙹ’ෝ⪽ᬊ⦽ə൚⧁ݚŝᱶᮥᱽ᜽⦹ᩡ݅.

݅ᖐṙ, ᇥᕾđŝ᮹á᷾ᮥ᭥⦹ᩍᯥ᮹⇵⇽⦽13}ᩎᔍᨱݡ⦹ᩍ

⢽ᵡḡ⋉ŝᅙᩑǍᨱᕽᱽ᜽ࡽ℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᮥbbᱢᬊ⦹ᩍ

ᝅ⊂⊹᪡እƱ⦹ᩡ݅. እƱđŝᅙᩑǍᨱᕽᱽ᜽ࡽsᮥᔍᬊ⧩ᮥ

Ğᬑ᪅₉aᮁ᮹⦹í}ᖁࡹᨩ݅. ঑௝ᕽᅙᩑǍ۵ʑ᳕᮹ႊჶು

ᨱ እ⧕ ᱶၡ⦹Ł ⧊ญᱢᯙ ႊჶುᯕ௝ ⧁ ᙹ ᯩ݅.

ᅙᩑǍ᮹đŝෝ☖⧕ᕽᝁȽᩎᔍÕᖅ᜽, ᩎᔍ✚ᖒᨱ฿۵

sᮥᱢᬊ⦹۵ᅙᩑǍ᮹ႊჶುᮥᱢᬊ⧁⦥᫵aᯩᮭᮥᅕᩡ݅.

ݡࠥ᜽ǭᨱᕽᔩ೎íࠥ᜽℁ࠥᩎᮥÕᖅ⧁ভ, ࠥ᜽℁ࠥᩎ᮹℉ࢱ

᜽eḲᵲශᮡ⧕ݚᩎ᮹ᯝ⠪Ɂ᜚~ᙹᩩ⊂sŝᩎᖙǭ᮹ᨦྕLQ ḡᙹෝ⪶ᯙ⦹ᩍə൚ᄥಽ ℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᮥ݅෕íᱢᬊ⦹۵

äᯕ ⧊ญᱢᯕ௝Ł ❱݉ࡽ݅.

⨆⬥ᩑǍŝᱽಽᕽ, ᕽᬙᯕ᫙᮹݅᧲⦽ḡᩎᮥݡᔢᮝಽᅙ

ᯩᮥäᮝಽᩩᔢࡽ݅. ੱ⦽, ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵đᱶುᱢ(deterministic)

ႊჶುᮝಽ℉ࢱ᜽eḲᵲශᮥᔑ⇽⦹ᩡᮝӹ, ⨆⬥, ə൚ᄥݡ⣐

sᨱ঑ෙ⪶ශುᱢ(probabilistic) ႊჶುᮝಽəsᮥᔑ⇽⦽݅໕

᳡ ޵ ᱶၡ⦽ ᩩ⊂ᯕ a܆⧁ äᮝಽ ʑݡࡽ݅.

References

Black, A. (1995). Urban mass transportation planning, McGRAW- HILL, New York, N.Y.

Choi, K., Won, C. Y. and Chung, W. (2007). “Classification of free- ways based on the characteristics of hourly traffic variation for efficient network planning.” Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 27, No.

6D, pp. 713-719 (in Korean).

Chung, S. B., Kim, S. K. and Kim, J. Y. (2009). “Peak factor analysis using 24 hours traffic count data.” Journal of Transportation Research, Vol. 16, No. 3, The Korea Transport Institute, pp.

41-50 (in Korean).

Hair, Joseph F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. and Black, W. C.

(1987). Multivariate data analysis with readings, Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, N.Y.

Kim, H. (2007). Developing guidelines for evaluating and selecting urban rail transit systems, The Korea Transport Institute (in Korean).

Kim, H. and Chang, J. S. (2012). “Calculation of the peak-hour ratio for road traffic volumes using a hybrid clustering technique.”

Journal of Korean Society of Transportation, Korean Society of Transportation, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 19-30 (in Korean).

Kim, J. (2012). Empirical study on estimating the walking distances of users in catchment area according to characteristics of land use, MSc Thesis, Hanyang University (in Korean).

Kim, K. Y. and Jhun, M. (1990). SAS clustering analysis, Free- Academy (in Korean).

Korea Development Institute (2008). The study on revision and supplement of standard guideline for preliminary feasibility study on road and railroad projects (the 5th edition).

Korea Rail Network Authority (2010a). Railway design guidelines, Korea Rail Network Authority (in Korean).

Korea Rail Network Authority (2010b). The revision study on manual for railway investment evaluation, Korea Rail Network Authority (in Korean).

Lee, H., Lee, J. A. and Ahn, K. H. (2012). “Empirical study on the classification and characteristic of commercial area development in Gyonggi-do.” Journal of Korea Planners Association, Korea Planners Association, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 45-56 (in Korean).

Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (2010). The standard of design and placement of complex transfer center, Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (in Korean).

Song, D. B. and Oh, N. H. (2001). “The classification and charac- teristics analysis of rural communities in Chungnam province.”

Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association, Korean Regional Development Association, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 107-120 (in Korean).

Song, M. K. and Chang H. (2012). “Characterization of cities in Seoul metropolitan area by cluster analysis.” Journal of the Korean Society for GeoSpatial Information System, Korean Society for GeoSpatial Information System, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp.

83-88 (in Korean).

Sung, H. M., Yun, I. S., Park, M. C. and Kim, C. S. (2009).

“Analysis of hourly variation for the highway traffics in Korea.”

Journal of Transportation Research, The Korea Transport Insti- tute, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 1-11 (in Korean).

Vuchic, V. R. (2005). Urban transit: operations, planning, and economics, WILEY, Hoboken, New Jersey.

http://www.kric.or.kr/index.jsp (Accessed March 21, 2012).

(10)

수치

Fig. 1. Flow of Research 1. ᕽು1.1 ઴֜ଭࢼլࢫࡧୡ℁ࠥᩎ ᜚~ᙹ᫵᮹ ℉ࢱ᜽e Ḳᵲශᮡ ℁ࠥ᜽ᖅ᮹ ĥ⫮ ၰᬕᩢᨱᵲ᫵⦽᫵ᗭಽ⪽ᬊࡹŁᯩ݅
Table 1. Variables Setting
Table 2. Factor Scores of Three Factors
Table 4. Average Factor Scores of Each Group
+3

참조

관련 문서

Sungkyunkwan Univ., Energy Mechatronics Lab... Sungkyunkwan Univ.,

Sungkyunkwan Univ., Energy Mechatronics Lab... Sungkyunkwan Univ.,

Lab., Hanyang Univ...

1 John Owen, Justification by Faith Alone, in The Works of John Owen, ed. John Bolt, trans. Scott Clark, "Do This and Live: Christ's Active Obedience as the

Department of Nuclear Engineering, Seoul National Univ..

Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University of College

School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Seoul National University..

School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Seoul National University..