Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 63
ERRATUM: Correction of Figure 1
Outcomes of surgical treatments for rectovaginal fistula and prognostic factors for successful closure:
a single-center tertiary hospital experiences
Seung-Bum Ryoo
1, Heung-Kwon Oh
1,2, Heon-Kyun Ha
3, Eon Chul Han
1,4, Yoon-Hye Kwon
1, Inho Song
1, Sang Hui Moon
1, Eun Kyung Choe
1,5, Kyu Joo Park
11
Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2
Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
3
Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, Korea
4
Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Busan, Korea
5
Healthcare Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea
https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2019.97.3.149 Ann Surg Treat Res 2019;97(3):149-156
To the Editor:
In the last box of Figure 1 in this paper, there was an unintentional mistake in one word.
The “overall operations rate” shall be corrected to the “overall success rate.”
Corrected Figure 1
pISSN 2288-6575 • eISSN 2288-6796 https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2020.99.1.63 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
ERRATUM
Second operations for RVF (n = 16) First operations for RVF (n = 92)a)
Third operations for RVF (n = 11)
Fourth operations for RVF (n = 5)
Fifth operations for RVF (n = 3)
Sixth operations for RVF (n = 1)
Overall success rate (n = 39, 42.4%) Successful closure (n = 31)
Successful closure (n = 3)
Successful closure (n = 5)
Successful closure (n = 0)
Successful closure (n = 0)
Successful closure (n = 0)
Transanal rectal advancement flap, 8 (0, 0%) Diverting stomy only, 4 (0, 0%)
Sphincteroplasty with perineoplasty, 1 (1, 100%) Bowel resection, 1 (1, 100%)
Gracilis muscle transposition, 1 (0, 0%) Stem cell injection, 1 (1, 100%)
Transanal rectal advancement flap, 3 (1, 33.3%) Gracilis muscle transposition, 3 (3, 100%) Diverting stomy only, 2 (0, 0%)
Fistulectomy with seton placement, 1 (0, 0%) Martius flap, 1 (0, 0%)
Stem cell injection, 1 (1, 100%)
Gracilis muscle transposition, 2 (0, 0%) Transanal rectal advancement flap, 1 (0, 0%) Bowel resection, 1 (0, 0%)
Stem cell injection, 1 (1, 0%)
Diverting stomy only, 2 (0, 0%) Martius flap, 1 (0, 0%)
Gracilis muscle transposition, 1 (0, 0%) Diverting stomy only, 53 (5, 9.4%)
Transanal rectal advancement flap, 25 (18, 72.0%) Sphincteroplasty with perineoplasty, 5 (5, 100%) Bowel resection, 4 (1, 25.0%)
Fistulectomy with seton placement, 4 (1, 25.0%) Martius flap, 1 (1, 100%)
b)
