Com p ari s o n o f Kin e t ic V ari able s an d M u s c le A c t iv ity o f A nk le Jo in t D urin g W alk in g
in S ubj e c t s W ith an d W ith o ut D i ab e t ic P lant ar U lc e rs
K w o n Oh - y u n , P h .D., P .T .
Dept . of Reh abilitation T her apy , College of Health S cience In stitut e of Health S cience, Yon sei Univ er sity
C h o i K y u - h w a n , M .P .H . , P .T . Dept . of Phy sical T her apy , An san 1 College
국 문 요 약
보 행 시 정 상 인 과 당 뇨 병 성 족 부 궤 양 환 자 의 족 관 절 운 동 역 학 적 변 수 와 근 활 성 도 비 교
권오윤
연세대학교 보건과학대학 재활학과 및 보건과학연구소 최규환
안산1대학 물리치료과
본 연구는 보행주기 동안 정상인과 당뇨병성 족부궤양 환자의 족관절 운동역학적 변수 와 족관절 근육들의 근활성도에 차이가 있는지 알아보기 위하여 실시하였다. 본 연구의 대상자는 당뇨병성 족부궤양이 있는 환자 9명(남자: 6명, 여자: 3명)과 성, 연령, 체중으로 짝짓기(matching)시킨 대조군 9명이었다. 3차원 동작분석기, 힘판, 표면 근전도를 이용하 여, 보행주기 동안 족관절의 관절가동범위, 모멘트(moment ), 일률(power ), 그리고 내측 가자미근, 전경골근, 비복근의 근수축 개시시간(onset time)과 종료시간(cessation time)을 측정하였다. 정상군과 비교하여 당뇨병성 족부궤양군의 보행속도는 느렸고, 입각기 기간 이 길었으며, 족관절의 가동범위가 적었고, 족관절 최대 족저굴곡 모멘트와 일률이 정상 군에서보다 유의하게 낮았다. 보행주기에서 당뇨병성 족부궤양군에서 내측 가자미근과 비 복근의 근수축 개시시간은 유의하게 빨랐으며, 전경골근과 비복근의 근수축 종료시간은
유의하게 지연되었다. 당뇨병성 족부궤양 환자군의 족관절 근육에서 동시수축
(co- contr action )이 증가되고, 보행속도가 느리며, 입각기 기간이 증가하였다. 이러한 보행 특성의 차이는 족부 감각손실에 따른 보행의 안정성을 유지하기 위한 보행전략 때문으로 판단된다. 앞으로 이러한 비정상적인 보행특성이 당뇨병성 족부궤양에서 발생하는 비정상 적인 족저부 압력분포과 족부궤양 발생과 어떤 관계가 있는지 알아보는 연구가 필요할 것이다.
핵심단어 : 근전도; 당뇨병성 신경증; 당뇨병성 족부궤양; 보행분석.
In t r o d u c t i o n
Mor e than 50% of the 120,000 non - tr aum atic, low er ex tr emity amput ation in the United States each y ear r esult fr om complication s of diabet es (Pecor ar o et al, 1990). T he most common type of neur opathy in diabet es is a distal symmetric polyneur o- pathy , w hich is m ainly char act erized by sen sory and aut onomic manifest ation s (T homas, 1992). In diabetes mellitus, neur o- pathy can appear as a sen sory , aut onomic, or m ot or disor der that is irr ev er sible (Pfeffer et al, 1997). Dist al m ot or neur o- pathy r esult s in w eakness of foot and ankle mu scles (Ander sen et al, 1996).
Diabetic n eur opathy m ay disrupt both affer ent and effer ent pathw ay s of the low er extr emity necessary for th e m aint enance of postur e an d norm al gait (Cav anagh et al, 1992). Neur opathy may lead t o a disturban ce of foot mechanics as ex pr essed in specific gait par am et er s (Kat oulis et al, 1997).
W eakness of foot and ankle mu scles contributes t o deformity and causes abnormal weightbearing distribution (Edm ond, 1998).
Sever al studies have analyzed gait patt ern s in patient s w ith diab etic n eu r op at h y (Court em anche et al, 1996; Kat oulis et al, 1997; Mueller et al, 1994). Mueller and colleagues (1994) r eported that subject s with diabetic neur opathy and a hist ory of plant ar ulcer s had less ankle m obility , peak ankle plant ar mom ent an d pow er , w alkin g v elocity , and stride length than contr ol subject s . Kat oulis and colleagues (1997) r eport ed that subject s in their ex perim ent al gr oup with diabet es and a hist ory of foot ulcer ation had slow er w alking speed an d
sm aller m ax imum knee joint angle in the sagittal plane compared with healthy subject s, and with subj ect s in the diabetic gr oup without foot ulcer ation . Court em anche and colleagues (1996) r eported that patient s with diabetic neur opathy had sm aller cycle amplitude, cy cle speed, and per cent age time spent in sin gle support ph ase than contr ol subject s .
T he fun dam ental inform ation u sed in the analy sis of hum an gait con sist s of motion , ground reaction forces, and electr omyogr aphy (S elikt ar an d Bo, 1995). In pr eviou s studies (Kat oulis et al, 1997; Mueller et al, 1994), kinem atic and kin etic par am et er s w er e u sed t o compar e gait char acteristics of subject s with an d without diabetic neur opathy . T he joint mom ent calculat ed fr om an inv er se dynamics analy sis is a n et mom ent , the algebr aic sum of all mu scle mom ent s acting about that joint. When co- contr action t akes place at a j oint , analy sis yields only th e net effect of both the agonist and antagonist mu scles (Wint er , 1990). Inv er se dyn amics does not differentiate between co- contr action of agonist s and ant agonist s, or pr ovides isolat ed activity of a sin gle mu scle gr oup (Zaj ac, 1993). Electr omyogr aphic dat a ar e essential t o under stand timing of mu scle function , an d t o in dicat e the contribution of activ e mu scle gr oup s t o net mu scle tor qu es durin g a g ait cy cle (Br an dell, 1977).
Alth ough pr eviou s studies (Court em anch e
et al, 1996; Kat oulis et al, 1997; Mueller et
al, 1994) quantify t empor al, kinem atic, and
kinetic parameter s during walking in subject s
with diabetic neur opathy, no studies describe
EMG activity r elat ed to joint mom ent s
durin g w alkin g in subj ect s with diabet es,
peripher al neur opathy , an d a hist ory of diabetic plant ar ulcer s (DPU ). T he study of electr omyography may be useful for the interpret ation and clarification of the kinetic chan ges and biomechanical mechanism of ankle j oint during w alking in patient s with DPU . T he purposes of this study w er e t o ex amine mu scle activity of the ankle joint , and t o compar e joint m om ent s and pow er of the ankle joint during walking bet ween subject s with DPU and m at ched contr ol subject s .
M e t h o d s
S ubje c t s
Nine subject s with DPU w er e r ecruit ed fr om the Diabetic F oot Clinic an d Reh abili- t ation an d F itness Cent er , both at Barnes Jewish Christian Health Sy st em , in St . Louis, MO. T h e selection crit eria of DPU subject s in cluded diagn osis of diabet es m ellitu s and periph er al neur opathy , hist ory of diabetic plant ar ulcer s, ability t o w alk independently without an as sistiv e device, and mental alertness. Subjects with dem entia , an amput ation , or a significant neur ological or orthopedic problem were excluded. Subject s unable t o sen se th e 5.07 m on ofilam ent on any portion of their foot w er e con sider ed t o hav e peripher al neur opathy (Mu eller et al, 1989). Hist ory of a plant ar neur opathic ulcer w as u sed t o v erify the diagnosis of peripher al n eur opathy . Nin e age, sex , an d w eight - m at ched contr ol subj ect s w er e r e- cruit ed from the st affs at W ashington Univ er sity an d the community . Crit eria for contr ol subject selection w er e no hist ory of diabet es m ellitu s, ability t o w alk inde-
pendently without an assistiv e device, and no hist ory of mental, neur ological or ortho- pedic pr oblem s .
P ro c e dure s
T he principal inv estigat or ex plained all pr ocedur es t o the subj ect s, and all subject s signed an informed con sent form appr ov ed by the W ashingt on Univ er sity School of Medicin e Hum an Studies Committee befor e t esting . Each subject w as ev aluat ed in the Movement Science Laboratory of the Phy sical T her apy Pr ogr am at the W ashin gt on Univ er sity S chool of Medicin e.
Inform ation obt ained fr om each subject , included respon ses to a questionnaire, clinical m ea sur em ent s , sur face elect r om y gr aphic (EMG) dat a, kin em atic, and kin etic dat a. A brief questionn air e w a s u sed t o obt ain each subject s m edical hist ory . Subj ect s with DPU w er e question ed r eg ar din g the hist ory of their disease, type of diabet es, dur ation of diabetes , and the sit e of plantar ulcer s.
Clinical mea sur em ent s in cluded ankle j oint range of motion, and the Semmens W ein st ein m onofilam ent t est . Ankle j oint r ang e of m otion for ankle dor siflexion with knee ext ended (DFE ), dor siflexion with knee flex ed (DF F ), inv er sion , and ev er sion w as m easur ed with a univ er sal goniom et er . Reliability of these m easur es h as been established in this group of patient s (Diam ond et al, 1989). Dem ogr aphic dat a in cludin g sex , dat e of birth , w eight , and height w er e r ecor ded.
All subject s had their gait assessed using videography
1)and surface electromyogr aphic
1. Motion Analysis Co. 3617 Westw ind Blv d,
Sant a Rosa, CA 95403
r ecor ding s
2). All in strum ent s w er e calibrated before data collection. The subj ect s in short s exposed th eir low er extr emities for the att achm ent of r eflectiv e m arker s and EMG electrodes. And then each subj ect w or e their own low - heeled (less than 2 centimet er s) shoes during gait trials. Retr or eflectiv e m arker s w er e placed ov er th e fibular head, dist al lat er al m alleolu s , head of the fifth m etatar sal, lat er al calcaneu s, and supra- navicular . In addition, t wo m arker s w er e att ached on the leg at mid- thigh lev el and mid- shank lev el.
EMG sign als durin g w alking w er e tr an s - mitt ed by a thr ee- ch annel cabling unit . Raw EMG signals w er e collect ed fr om pr e- amplified (nomin al 35v/ v gain ) surface electrodes (33×17×10 ㎜). Skin pr epar ation con sist ed of a light scrubbing w ith alcohol befor e application of the EMG electr odes.
Double- sided adhesiv e w ash er s
3)w er e u sed t o secur e electr odes t o the skin . Electr odes w er e placed on the belly of the mu scle of int er est , with the long ax is of the electr ode positioned par allel t o the mu scle fiber s.
Anatomical guidelin es by Per otto (1994) w er e u sed t o position electr odes. T hr ee muscles, soleus, medial gastrocnemius, and tibialis ant erior of the ulcer at ed low er limb w er e ch osen for this EMG study . T hese mu scles w er e select ed becau se of their agonist/ antagonist r elation ship , an d their m onoarticular/ biarticular syner gistic r ole. A r efer ence electr ode w as placed on the m edial malleolu s. A foot swit ch w as taped
2. T herapeutics Unlimited, Model #67, 2835 Friendship Street , Iow a cit y , IA 52240 3. Converters, Inc. 1617 Republic Rd. Huntingdon
Valley , PA 19006
under the subject s heel. F or ce platform dat a w er e u sed t o det ermin e initial heel- strike (HS ) and t oe- off (T O) tim e. F oot swit ch dat a w er e u sed to det ermine th e time of the next heel strike.
P articipant s w er e asked t o w alk n orm ally along a 6 m w alkw ay at a fr eely chosen comfort able w alkin g speed. Prior t o dat a collection , subj ect s w er e allow ed t o pr actice trials t o en sur e that th ey could st ep onto the for ce platform successfully w ith th e foot t o be m easur ed. W alking speed (㎧) w as m easur ed u sing a st opw atch .
T wo camer as wer e used t o capture marker trajectories as the subject pr ogr essed along the w alkw ay . Gr ound r eaction for ces and ext ernal moment s during gait were r ecor ded by a for ce platform embedded in th e w alkw ay . Simult aneou s dat a sampling fr om the EMG electr odes at 1200 ㎐, and cam er as, a foot swit ch an d for ce platform w as perform ed at 60 ㎐ during gait trials.
After gait trials, m aximum v olunt ary
contr action (MVC) t est s w er e isom etrically
performed to pr ovide a level for normalizing
EMG data collect ed during g ait trials. T w o
m aximum effort s w er e perform ed in each
position and held for a three second r ecor ding
period, with a 60 second r est betw een each
contr action . T h e MVC v alue of the soleu s
w as obt ain ed by havin g subject s perform a
m aximum heel rise with knee joint flexion
at 50 degr ees , while the subj ect h eld th e
ex aminer s h ands t o m aintain balance. T he
MVC v alue of th e m edial gastr ocn emiu s
w as obt ain ed by havin g subject s perform a
heel rise t o maximum plant ar flexion w ith
the knee extended. The maximum voluntary
contr action t est for the tibialis anterior w as
performed isometrically in mid- range position while seat ed. Maximum r esist an ce w as applied at th e dist al end of the dist al limb segm ent by the ex aminer .
D at a re du c tion
Dat a fr om the cam er as, a for ce platform , a foot swit ch , and EMG w er e r educed u sing the Kintr ack soft w ar e sy st em
4). T o define the gait cycle v ariables, dur ation of swing and st ance ph ases, the foot swit ch and force platform signals were in dividually identified and adju st ed by Kintr ak soft w ar e so that dat a for all subject s w er e int er - polat ed t o 100 per cent of a gait cy cle.
Kinem atic dat a w er e u sed t o calculat e joint angle at ankle. Kinetic dat a w er e u sed t o calculat e m om ent s. Kinem atic and kinetic gr ound r eaction for ce dat a an d anthr opom etric v ariables w er e combined with standard link - segment kinetic equation s t o calculat e m om ent at ankle. T he av er ag e of thr ee trials for each subject w a s taken . Mom ent s an d pow er w er e normalized by body weight in Newt on met er s per kilogr am (Nm/ ㎏) an d W/ ㎏, r espectiv ely , and all m om ent and pow er dat a w er e r eport ed with r espect to per cent age of the g ait cy cle (%GC, wher e HS =0% and next HS of sam e low er ex tr emity =100%). En semble averaged moment and power data, norm alized by body w eight , w er e plotted ov er th e gait cy cle for both DPU and contr ol gr oups.
Raw EMG signals r ecor ded during gait were bandpass- filt ered u sing a fourth - or der filt er at 40~300 ㎐ and full- w av e r ectified (P erry , 1996). Dat a w er e sampled at 1200
4. Motion Analysis Corporation, 3617 W estw ind Blv d, Sant a Rosa , CA 95403
㎐. EMG analy sis determined onset and cessation tim es of all mu scles activity thr ough out the entir e gait cy cle. On set and cessation times were determined aut om atically by the Kintr ak soft w ar e sy stem based on select ed thr eshold v alues. A thr eshold of thr ee st andar d deviation s above the quiet est portion of th e EMG r ecor d w as u sed t o identify mu scle firin g on set and cessation time (Di F abio, 1987). All EMG activity on set and cessation tim es w er e r eport ed a s a percentage of the gait cycle (%GC). T he aver age of thr ee trials for each subj ect w a s t aken .
T o quantify mu scular activity and t o compar e the activity bet w een differ ent mu scles and bet w een differ ent subject s, EMG dat a w er e normalized. T o det ermine the r efer en ce v alu e for norm alizin g EMG dat a, signals r ecor ded during MVC t est s w er e filt er ed and r ectified in the sam e fashion as for the EMG dat a for the gait cy cle. One hundr ed per cent MVC w as defined as th e m ean r ectified EMG for th e highest one second of dat a for the t w o contr action s performed durin g the MVC t est .
Ankle joint range of motions, joint m om ent dat a, on set and cessation tim es of mu scle activity , pow er , and t empor al par am et er s were compared statistically between subject s with DPU and contr ol subject s u sing a pair ed t - t est .
R e s u l t s
S ubje c t s
T able 1 describes the subject s. Nine
subject s (3 fem ale, 6 m ale) with DUP an d
T able 1 . Descriptiv e charact eristics of the subj ect s
Char act eristic Gr oup
DPU (n =9) Contr ol (n =9) ov er all (N =18) A ge (yr )
Mean (SD) 59.2 (11.2) 59.2 (12.6) 59.2 (12.6)
Rang e 39~79 35~76 35~79
Gender
F em ale (%) 3 (33.3) 3 (33.3) 6 (33.3)
Male (% ) 6 (66.7) 6 (66.7) 12 (66.7)
W eight (㎏)
Mean (SD) 105.4 (10.5) 106.6 (10.9) 106.0 (11.1)
Rang e 74~161 85~180 74~180
Height (㎝)
Mean (SD) 177.0 (10.1) 176.4 (11.3) 176.7 (10.4)
Rang e 155~187 156~193 155~193
F oot deformity
Hamm er toe (%) 4 (44.4) 3 (33.3)
Hallux v algu s (%) 3 (33.3)
Hamm er toe + Hallux v algu s (% ) 2 (22.2) Dur ation of DM
Mean (SD) 19.3 (7.2)
Rang e 2.0~35.0
T ype of DM
IDDM (%) 2 (22.2)
NIDDM (%) 7 (77.8)
Number of ulcer s
1 tim e (%) 2 (22.2)
2 tim es (%) 5 (55.6)
4 tim es (%) 2 (22.2)
Side of ulcer
Right (% ) 5 (55.6)
Left (%) 4 (44.4)
Sit e of ulcer
1st and 2nd MT P j oint (%) 5 (55.6) 3r d an d 4th MT P joint (% ) 2 (22.2)
Gr eat t oe (%) 2 (22.2)
No significant difference betw een gr oups (p> .05) in age, w eight , height (pair ed t - t est )
Abbr eviation : DM , diabet es m ellitus ; IDDM , insulin - dependent diabet es m ellitus ; NIDDM ,
non - in sulin - depen dent diabet es m ellitus ; MT P , m et at arsophalangeal
a m ean age of 59.2 year s (SD =11.2, r an ge
=39~79) w er e designat ed as the DPU gr oup . Nine ag e, sex , and w eight - matched subject s (3 female, 6 male) without diabet es and peripher al n eur opathy had a m ean age of 59.2 year s (SD =12.6, r ange=35~76) and were designated as the contr ol gr oup. T he av er age w eight of subject s with DPU and contr ol subj ect s w er e 105.4 ㎏ and 106.6 ㎏, r espectiv ely , and th e av er age height w er e 177.0 ㎝ an d 176.4 ㎝, r espectiv ely . T h er e w er e no significant differences in age, weight , or height bet w een subject s w ith DPU and contr ol subject s (p> .05).
F our subj ect s (44.4%) in the gr oup with DPU and thr ee subject s (33.3%) in contr ol gr oup had a hamm er toe deformity . T hr ee subject s (33.3%) in the gr oup with DPU had a hallux valgus deformity. T wo subj ect s (22.2%) in the gr oup with DPU had both hamm er t oe and h allux v algu s deformities.
T he m ean dur ation of diabetes in the subject s with DPU w as 19.3 y ear s (SD=
7.2, r ange=2.0~35.0). T he subject s with DPU in cluded tw o (22.2% ) with in sulin - depen dent diabet es m ellitu s (T ype I) an d
sev en (77.8%) with n on - in sulin - depen dent diabet es m ellitu s (T ype II). F iv e subject s (55.6%) had a hist ory of plantar ulcer s under the fir st and second m et at ar sal heads. T w o subject s (22.2%) had a history of plant ar ulcer s under the thir d an d fourth m etatar sal h eads, and t w o subj ect s (22.2% ) had a hist ory of plant ar ulcer s under the gr eat toe.
A nkle ran g e of m ot ion
Mean v alues and st andar d deviation s of ankle r ange of m otion , m easur ed by a goniom et er , for subject s w ith DPU and contr ol subj ect s ar e shown in t able 2.
Subject s with DPU sh ow ed decr eased dor siflex ion compar ed with contr ol subject s (- 0.6±2.5 v s 4.8±4.8 , p< .05 for DF E ; 5.8
±3.8 vs 10.9±4.0 , p< .05 for DFF ). Subjects with DPU showed decreased subt alar joint motion compared with control subject s (22.0
±5.7 vs 29.0±5.7 , p< .01 for inver sion ; 2.0
±3.0 v s 8.9±5.9 , p< .01 for ever sion).
On s e t an d c e s s ation tim e s
T able 3 pr esent s the m ean v alues an d
T able 2 . Comparis on of ankle ran ge of m otion (degree) betw een subject s w ith DPU and cont rol subj ect s
Motion
Gr oup
t DPU (n =9) Contr ol (n =9)
DF E - 0.6±2.5 4.8±4.8 2.90
*DF F 5.8±3.8 10.9±4.0 2.84
*Inv er sion 22.0±5.7 29.0±5.7 5.14
* *Ev er sion 2.0±3.0 8.9±5.9 3.56
* *Mean±SD
Abbreviations : DF E , dor siflexion w ith knee ext ended, DF F , dorsiflexion w ith knee flex ed
*
p< .05,
* *p< .01
T able 3 . Comparis on of onset t ime and cessation t im e (% of gait cycle) betw ee subj ect s w ith DPU and control subj ect s
Mu scle
On set T im e Cessation T im e
DPU Contr ol DPU Contr ol
Soleu s 2.5±2.3 11.5±2.6
* *58.9±6.6 56.4±5.7
* *Medial
gastr ocnemiu s 3.9±2.8 14.1±2.4
* *59.7±6.1 57.1±5.3
T ibialis
anterior 58.4±3.5 59.1±4.0 30.4±8.9 13.8±1.5
* *Mean±SD
*
p< .05,
* *p< .01
F i g 1 . Ensemble- averaged EMG profiles of soleus, medial
gast rocnem ius , tibialis ant erior muscle for subj ect s w ith DPU
(n =9) and contr ol subj ect s (n =9). T he ordin at e present s
inform ation in percent of an MV C. T he abscissa pr esent s
inform ation in percent of a gait cycle (0%=heel cont act ,
100%=n ext heel cont act ).
standar d deviation of the onset and cessation times (%GC). Comparing on set tim e (%
GC) of mu scle activity during w alking bet w een subject s with DPU and contr ol subject s , activ ation w as significantly earlier in DPU subj ect s than in contr ol subject s for th e soleu s (2.5±2.3% v s 11.5±2.6% , p< .01), and medial gostr ocnemiu s (3.9±
2.8% v s 14.1±2.4%, p< .05). Cessation tim es for the soleu s (58.9±6.6% v s 56.4±5.7%, p< .01), and tibialis ant erior (30.4±8.9% v s 13.8±1.5%, p< .01) occurred lat er in subject s with DPU .
F igur e 1 pr esent s m ean amplitude (%
MVC) curv es during w alking in subject s with DPU an d contr ol subject s (en semble av er aged curv e, n =9 for each gr oup ). T her e ar e differ ences in the shape and amplitude of mu scle activity (%MVC). Mu scle activity of soleu s , tibialis ant erior had a longer dur ation in subject s with DPU when compar ed t o contr ol subject s. Activities of the soleu s an d m edial gastr ocnemiu s mu scle began earlier durin g the initial st ance pha se in the contr ol subject s.
T e m poral , kin em ati c s , m om ent an d po w er dat a
Differ ences in temporal parameter s bet - ween the two groups are pr esented in table 4. Comfort able walking speed was signi- ficantly slower in subject s with DPU than in control subject s (.70±.19 ㎧ v s .90±.17 ㎧, p< .01). T he stance phase (%GC) was significantly longer in subject s with DPU (66.92%±3.58 v s 63.33±1.15%, p< .05). During walking subject s with DPU showed lower mean values of peak ankle dor siflexion moment (.04±.05 Nm/ ㎏ v s .10±.03 Nm/ ㎏, p< .01) and peak ankle plantar flexion moment (1.18±.19 Nm/ ㎏ v s 1.54±.16 Nm/ ㎏, p< .05).
During walking subject s with DPU showed significantly lower mean values of peak ankle plantar flexion power (.62±.52 W/ ㎏ v s 1.85
±.51 W/ ㎏, p< .01). T he subjects with DPU showed lesser peak ankle dor siflexion range of motion (6.10±3.69 v s 8.66±2.95, p< .05) during walking.
Ensemble- averaged ankle dor siflexion range of motion, joint moment , and power profiles (n =9 for each group) of subject s with DPU and control subject s are shown in Figure 2.
T able 4 . Comparis on of t emporal and j oint m om ent , pow er , and ran ge of m otion dat a betw een subj ect s w ith DPU an d contr ol subj ect s
P ar amet er DPU (n =9) Contr ol (n =9)
W alkin g speed (㎧) .70±.19 .90±.17
* *St ance ph ase (% of gait cy cle) 66.92±3.58 63.33±1.15
*P eak dor siflexion m oment (Nm/ ㎏) .04±.05 .10±.03
* *P eak plantar flexion mom ent (Nm/ ㎏) 1.18±.19 1.54±.16
*P eak dor siflexion (degr ee) 6.10±3.69 8.66±2.95
*P eak plantar flexion pow er (W/ ㎏) .62±.52 1.85±.51
* *Mean±SD
*