7 . N o n lin e ar S p e c t ro s c o py
Nonlinear effect s => Sub - Doppler spectroscopy
7 .1 Lin e ar an d N on lin e ar A b s orpti on
F or a plane lightw av e, E = E0 cos ( t - k z ), (w here, = Ek - Ei ) pas ses thr ou gh a s ample, the pow er abs orbed in the v olum e d V = A dz
is giv en by
dP = A I ik N dz [W ] (7.1a)
w here, N = [ Ni - ( gi/ gk) Nk]
T he r at e equ ation for the st ation ary population den sities of the n on degen er ate lev el |1> , |2> ,
dN1/ d t = B12 ( N2 - N1) - R1N1 + C1 dN2/ d t = B12 ( N1 - N2 ) - R2N2 + C2
w here, RiNi : tot al relax ation r ate (including spont aneou s emis sion )
Ci =
k Rk iNk + Di : r epopulation r at e of the lev el |i>
# Under st ation ary condition (dN / d t = 0),
T he un s atur ated population difference ( = 0) is
N0 = N ( = 0) = ( N02 - N01) = C2R1 - C1R2 R1R2
(7.4) T he s atur ated population difference ( 0) is
N = N 0
1 + B12 ( 1/ R1 + 1/ R2) = N 0
1 + S (7.5)
w here, S B12
R* : s atur ation par am et er w ith R* = R1R2
R1 + R2
: m ean relax ation pr ob ability (7.6a )
T he pow er ab sorbed along the ab sorption length dz dP = - P 12 N0
1 + S dz = - P 12 N0
1 + B12I / ( c R*) dz (7.7)
# F or sm all inten sity I , S << 1,
dP - P 12 N0 dz
and, the ab sorbed pow er is
P = P0 ex p ( - 12 N0z ) = P0e- z : Beer ' s law (7.9)
# F or strong int en sity I ,
dP = - P 12 N dz < - P 12 N0 dz
7 .2 S atu rati on of Inh om o g en e ou s Lin e P rofile
Spectr al lin ew idth of homog eneou s line profile (Section 3.6),
s = 0 1 + S0 ; S0 = S ( 0) (7.13)
7 .2 .1 H ole B urn in g
In the g aseou s s ample w ith a M ax w ell- Boltzm ann v elocity distribution , the abs orption cr os s section for a molecule w ith the v elocity component
vz on a tr an sition |1 > |2 > is
12( , vz) = 0 ( / 2)2
( - 0 - k vz)2 + ( / 2)2 (7.14)
w here, 0 = ( = 0 + k vz)
# F rom (7.5) and (3.85), the population den sities by a monochrom atic light w ith angular fr equency are
N1( , vz) = N01( vz) - N0
1
[
( - 0 - k vS0( z/ 2 ))2 + (2 s/ 2)2]
(7.15a )N2( , vz) = N02( vz) + N0
2
[
( - 0 - k vS0( z/ 2 ))2 + (2 s/ 2)2]
(7.15b )w here, = 1 + 2 : hom ogeneou s w idth of the tr an sition
( 1 2)- 1
# T he s atur at ed population differ ence is giv en by
N ( s , vz) = N0( vz)
[
1 - ( - 0 - k vS0( z/ 2))2 + (2 s/ 2)2]
(7.15c): B e nn e t H ole at vz = ( - 0) / k
w idth : s = 1 + S0
depth : N0( vz) - N ( vz) = N0( vz) S0
1 + S0 (7.16)
# T he contribution t o the abs orption coefficient of the molecule w ith v elocity vz t o vz + d vz :
d ( , vz)
d vz d vz = N ( vz) ( , vz) d vz (7.17)
T ot al ab sorption coefficient :
( ) = N ( vz) 12( , vz) d vz (7.18)
By (7.14) for ( , vz) and (7.15) for N ( vz),
( ) = N0 0
vp
e - ( vz/ vp)
2
( - 0 - k vz)2 + ( s/ 2 )2 d vz (7.19) w here, N0 = N0( vz) d vz
< Detection of the Bennet H ole by tw o las er beam s >
# s atur ating pump laser : fix ed fr equen cy 1 w ith the w av e v ect or k1
# w eak probe las er : frequency tuning acros s the Voigt profile w ith the w av e v ector k2
# T he ab sorption coefficient for the pr obe laser :
s( 1 , 2) = N0 0
vp
e - ( vz/ vp)
2
( 0 - - k2 vz)2 + ( / 2)2
[
1 - ( 0 - -S0k(1v/ 2)z)22+ ( s/ 2)2]
d vz(7.22)
=> s( 1 , ) = 0( )
[
1 - 1 + SS0 0 ( - (' )2/ 2 )+ (2 s/ 2 )2]
(7.23)a s atur ation dips at the probe frequency ,
= ' = 0 ( 1 - 0) k1/ k2 (+ : collinear , - : anticollinear ) h alfw idth : s = + s = [ 1 + ( 1 + S0)1 / 2]
depth : ( ' ) = 0( ' ) - s( ' ) = 0( ' ) S0
1 + S0 ( 1 + 1 + S0)
S0 2
0( ' ) for S0 1
7 .2 .2 L am b D ip s
F or the count erpropag ating w av es w ith the s am e frequ ency , the s atur at ed population difference is giv en by
N ( vz) = N0( vz)
[
1 - ( 0 - - k vS0( z/ 2 ))2 + (2 s/ 2)2 - ( 0 - + k vS0( z/ 2))2 + (2 s/ 2)2]
# T he s atur at ed ab s orption coefficient :
s( ) = N ( vz) [ ( 0 - - k vz) + ( 0 - + k vz) ] d vz
F or w eak field (S0 1),
s( ) = 0( )
[
1 - S20(
1 + ( - (0)s2/ 2 )+ (2 s/ 2 )2)]
(7.26a)w here, s = 1 + S0 , S0 = S0( I , 0)
F or strong field,
s( ) = 0( ) / 2
B
[
1 -(
2 (A + B- 0))
2]
1 / 2(7.26b )
w here, A [ ( - 0)2 + ( / 2)2]1/ 2
B [ ( - 0)2 + ( / 2)2 ( 1 + 2 S ) ]1/ 2
# s( 0) = 0( 0) / 1 + 2 S at the line cent er
= 0( 0) / 1 + S for ( - 0)
# m ax imum depth of the Lamp dip :
( - 0 s) - ( 0)
( 0) = 1
1 + S0 - 1
1 + 2 S0 - > m ax .
=> S0 1 .4
# If the probe w av e is v ery sm all (I2 I1),
s( ) = 0( )
[
1 - S20 ( - (0)2s/ 2 )+ (2 *s / 2 )2]
(7.27)7 .3 S atu rati on S pe c tro s c opy
T w o count erpropag ating las er beam s
7 .3 .1 E x perim e nt al S c h em e s
# Principal res on ance sign als
* Cros sov er r eson ance sign als occur simult aneou sly at the frequ ency ,
c = ca + c b
2 due t o the atom s w ith v elocity vz = ca - c b
k
** Residu al Doppler linew idth due t o the cros sin g an gle.
< Sen sitiv e v er sion of s atur ation spectros copy >
Optical isolat or , Du al pr obe beam s
ex ample)
Int erm odulated fluores cence technique
# Pump and probe beam s are chopped at t w o different frequencies ,
I1 = I0( 1 + cos 2 f1t) , I2 = I0( 1 + cos 2 f2t)
F luores cence inten sity :
If l = C Ns( I1 + I2) (7.29)
w here, Ns = N0[ 1 - a ( I1 + I2) ]
=> If l = C [ N0 ( I1 + I2) - a N0( I1 + I2)2] (7.30)
* linear t erm s (f1 , f2 ) : norm al LIF w ith a Doppler - br oaden ed profile
* qu adr atic t erm s (f1 + f2 , f1 - f2 ) : s atur at ed sign als
=> detect only (f1 + f2) component by Lock - in detection
=> linear b ackgroun d is suppres sed !!
7 .3 .3 Intrac av ity S aturati on S p e c tro s c opy
Las er output pow er
PL ( )
{
G( - 1 - 0( )[
1 - S20(
1 + ( - (0)s2/ 2)+ (2 s/ 2)2)]}
(7.31)A 2 + B + C + D
( - 0)2 + ( s/ 2 )2 (7.32)
Deriv ativ es of the laser pow er :
PL( 1)( ) = 2 A + B - 2 D ( - 0) [ ( - 0)2 + ( s/ 2)2]2
PL( 2 )( ) = 2 A + 6 D ( - 0)2 - 2 D ( s/ 2)2
[ ( - 0)2 + ( s/ 2)2]3 (7.33)
PL( 3 )( ) = 24 D ( - 0) [ ( - 0)2 - ( s/ 2)2]
[ ( - 0)2 + ( s/ 2)2]4
* B ro ad b ac k g rou n d di s appe ars f or th e h ig h e r deriv ativ e s !!
ex ample)
7 .3 .4 L am b - D ip F re qu en c y S t abiliz ation of L as ers
application ex ample)
* fr equen cy offset locking
ex ample)
7 .4 P ol ari z ation S pe c tro s c opy
ab sorption spectr os copy : abs orption ch ange
polarization spectroscopy : refr activ e index ch ang e
7 .4 .1 B as ic P rin c iple pump laser light - >
n onuniform population and unequ al s atur ation of the M - sublev els - >
birefrin gent for the incident probe las er light - >
plane of polarization dir ection of the pr obe beam is slightly rot at ed
0, pump beam : vz + vz = ( 0 - ) / k / k
probe beam : = - ( 0 - ) / k / k
probe beam is n ot influenced by the pump beam
= 0, pr obe beam ex periences a birefring ence !!
: an alogou s to the s atur ation spectr os copy
7 .4 .2 Lin e P rofil e s of P ol ariz ati on S ig n al s
Incident pr obe light w av e
After a path L through the pumped region of the s ample, the t w o component s are
Con sidering the index of refr action of the w indow , nw = br + i bi , probe w av e behind the exit w indow ,
If the tr an smis sion ax is of the an alyzer P2 is tilt ed by a sm all angle , the trn smitted amplitu de becom es Et = Ex s in + Ey cos .
If L 1, L k 1, and b 1 (pr actical), the tr an smitt ed amplitude is
Et = E0 ei tex p [ i ( nL + br) / c - 1
2 L - bi] ( + ) (7.37)
# det ect ed sign al :
S ( ) It( ) = c 0EtE*t
w here, I0 : incident inten sity
' = + / ( 2 c) br
# ab s orption coefiicient :
# refr activ e index : (by Kr am er s - Kr onig relation )
# con st ant b ackgroun d :
t erm : imperfection of polar ozer (extinction r atio) Glan - T hom son , Glan - Laser polarizer < 10- 6
' term : finite uncros sing angle bet w een the poly zer s b t erm : birefringence of the cell w indow
F or = 0, the sign al becom es a Lor entzian ( bi i : optimization !) F or bi, the sign al becom es a pure disper sion
ex ample)
* s atur ation spectr os copy
* polarization spectroscopy
Similarly , for the linearly polarized pump beam , the sign al is giv en by
# 0 => Lorentzian
7 .4 .4 S e n s itiv ity of P ol ariz ati on S p e c tro s c opy T he amplitude of the disper sion sign al
cf) s atur ation spectroscopy : full inten sity det ection
polarization spectroscopy : detect only the ch ang e => m ore s en sitiv e
In the abs ence of w indow birefring ence (br = bi = 0 ' = ), the sign al- to- nois e r atio for the disper sion sign al becom es
w here, I1/ a : m ean noise of the incident probe w av e
# m ax imum r atio (w hen 2 = ) :
T he m aximum sign al- t o- noise r atio for the Lor entzian sign al ( ' = 0), from (7.41)
If bi 4
0L ,
cf) In s atur ation spectroscopy , S
N = 1
2 a 0L S0
=> enh an cem ent fact or : C*JJ1/ ( 8 ) for the optimized Lorentzian
C*JJ1/ ( 4 ) for the optimized disper sion
7 .4 .5 A dv ant ag e s of P ol ari z ation S pe c tro s c opy High res olution
T he s en sitivity is 2- 3 order s of m agnitude larger th an th at of s atur ation spectros copy (But , intr acavity arr an gem ent is impos sible) T he pos sibility of distinguishin g betw een P , Q, R lines
T he disper sion profile of the sign al can be obt ained
=> laser fr equen cy st abilization w ithout any fr equency m odulation