• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

IEG 환경지질연구정보센터

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "IEG 환경지질연구정보센터"

Copied!
8
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)‚“æ~>Æ·~ã²æ. ò‰. Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 37~44, 2003. 2ê öæšÚ¢ šÏ‚ >wãÚö &‚ ’: öæšÚ Ú~ MTBE(Methyl tertiary Butyl Ether) ‡O 7. ;ç* ÁšÒ' Á‚ç¢ 1. 2. 3. ³ëV>Ò æ~>Òë¾ BÞã&v ~㦠7Ú&v ~ã". 1 2. *. 3. A Study of Ground Tire as a Sorption Media for the Passive Treatment Wall: Sorption of MTBE (Methyl tertiary Butyl Ether). Á. Á. Sang-Hyun Park1 Jai-Young Lee2 Sang-Il Choi3 1. Dept. of Groundwater., Korea Agriculture & Rural Infrastructure Corporation 2 *Dept. of Environmental Eng., University of Seoul 3 Dept. of Environmental Eng., Kwangwoon University. ABSTRACT Fuel oxygenates, such as Methyl tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) is additive in gasoline used to reduce air pollution. Gasoline components and fuel additives can leak form underground storage tanks. MTBE is far more water soluble than gasoline hydrocarbons like BTEX then it travels at essentially the same velocity as groundwater. MTBE in drinking water causes taste and odor problems. Therefore, the purpose of the this study is to examine the ability of ground tire to sorb MTBE in water. The study consisted of running both batch and column tests to determine the sorption capacity, the required sorption equilibration time, and the flow through utilization efficiency of ground tire. The batch test result indicated that ground tire can attain equilibrium sorption capacities about 0.5 mg of MTBE. The result of column test indicate that ground tire has on the 36% utilization rate. Finally, it is clear that ground tire represented an attractive and relatively inexpensive sorption medium for a MTBE. Authors thought that to determine the economic costs of ground tire utilization, the cost to sorb a given mass of contaminant by ground tire will have to be compared to currently accepted sorption media. The cost comparison will also have to include regeneration and disposal cost. Key words : MTBE, ground tire, equibibrium sorption, PRBs, utilization efficiency. º £ ^. MTBE(Methyl tertiary Butyl Ether)f ?f &ºÖ ò~ Î&B~ ÒÏf &VJ"bî~ Bj Î"'b‚ 6² Êæò, ž ‚Þb‚º æ~&Ë J‚¦V~ *‚ žš Æ· 5 æ~>~ J"j FB† > ® . ß® MTBE º ¸f ϚWb‚ žš æ~>ÚöBº æ~>f Žþ 7º*~² J"j FB† > ® .  ’öBº MTBE ¢ &ç bî‚ ~ öæšÚ¢ *ËÚ J"æ~> ;z » 7 ~¾ž >wãÚ »~ ‡O î‚ ÒÏj ï& ~V *š, ²ª þj ۚB ’V& ž öæšÚ~ MTBE ‡O ßWj 2kš ~ . 6‚ ¢" þj Û šB šÏ ÎN(Utilization Efficiency)j ’~& . 1.18 mm š~~ öæšÚ~ g  ‚& ‡Oïf £ 0.5 mgb‚ ¾æÒ . Freundlich N‡Oj šÏ~ ’‚ š† ‡OÏï" B ï ³ê G;j ‚ ê êÖB MTBE~ ‡Oïj jv~ šÏ ÎNj êÖ š Ö", 檚 &Ë ·f öæšÚ& £ 36%, ¾^æ v &æ «~~ öæ šÚº '' 15.6%f 16.4%~ ÎNj ¾æÚî . öæšÚ~ ¾ªjÏ" ÒjÏj J‚ š, öæšÚ~ šÏ *Corresponding author : [email protected] : 2003. 8. 30 : 2003. 9. 18 : 2003. 12 30. ö7>¢ î~ 5 Æ~. ²Òߞ¢ ræ. 37.

(2) ;ç*ÁšÒ'Á‚ç¢. 38. f ãB', ~ã' GšöB F›~Ò¢ '>–, 6‚ Air-Spargingš¾ Bioremediation" ?f ž *ËÚ »" 'b‚ 'ÏB š, B–ÎN Ëç" ?f ÿ> çßÎ"(synergy effect)¢ V&† > ®j ©š¢ ÒòB . "BÚ : MTBE, öæšÚ, N‡O, >wãÚ», šÏÎN 1.. B †. ¢ ËV* 㒠6º ‡«b‚ žÂö zš FB Nš {ž>î . ÿb þj ۂ BzW ¶ò¢ "– ‚ “ EPAº MTBE~ Bz&ËWj žÚBz&ËWb î(Probable human carcinogen) b‚ ÿböBº Bzö &‚ Ϫ‚ Ö& ®b¾, ž*ö²º ¦'.‚ Ö 6 º Ö& ìrj ¾æÚº B2‚ ;~ ® . V¢B ž ښ;ö ~º *šWö &‚ ÖJ& .>ƒ Ã&~& , MTBE ÒϚ B‚>º   B~ ;ê& ¸jæ  ®º º^š. . 6‚, ;öVb ¾Ò ^B 7 ~¾ž öæšÚ~ ~ã ^B¢ šÖ~V *‚ O»b‚ ÒæšÚf Zªö" ?f &šÏ" ~ÞҞ" š~²'" ?f šÏ  Ò >š¾ ÆÏÒ, ãæ ÒÏb‚ ö;&‚ Ò Ï>º ö;š šÏ> ® . ß®, Zªö" ?f ; º  šÏö &š ôš ’>Ú z . öæšÚ~ "W ªž W>æf ÂZº çï~ 7.³" FV J" bîj >O† > ® º ’& ôš šÚ^ z . V¢B,  ’öBº ôf >& B> ¾Ò> ® º öæšÚ~ MTBE~ ‡OßWj 2k~V *‚ ²ª þb‚ 10, 25, 50 mg/l ³ê~ MTBE¢ öæšÚf £ 48* v>~ öæšÚ~ N‡Oj ’~, þ. Î~ ¢" þj šÏ~ ‡OÎN" 2"Fj ’~  &ºÖ~ Î&B‚ ÒÏ>º MTBE‚ J"B æ~>¢ ¾Ò† > ®º ‡O >wãʂ~ ‡O î‚ 2êB öæšÚ~  'Ï æWö &‚ V.’¢ ~& . MTBE. ê³'ž ãBB*" “"~ ²>&š ËçNö V¢ ÛêÓ ¶òö Všš 2002j 1ú *Ò ¶ÿN ƒ&> & £ ÂâWò &‚  >º ê³ Ã& † ©b‚ . ç~ ® . š‚ ¶ÿN ƒ&>~ Ã&‚ žš  ò~ >ºf öæšÚ Bš Ã&~ ® . *Ò ÒÏ > ®º &ºÖ~ ãÖ, &ºÖ~ ®j*²‚ žš & V J"š 'šæ¶, &VJ"&6 ;k~ ¢~b‚ Ö Ò¾¢¢ j•‚ “  ôf “&öB ÖzB¢ &ºÖ ö Ž~êƒ ~Zz~& . ß®, “~ ãÖ 1990 j &VÓ;»(Clean Air Act)öB &VJ"š ‚ 9B êº > òö ÖzB¢ Ž~êƒ ~& . & ‚'ž ÖzB‚º öêR, Methyl tertiary Butyl Ether (š~ MTBE‚ £“) š ® . ß®, MTBEº &Ϛ &Z~,  V˚ çú~ &Ë ôš ÒÏ> ®º ÖzB‚ òö Î&>Ú úêVËj BF~ ¢Özê ²f ÊF" ?f &VJ"bî~ Bj Î"'b‚ 6 ²Ê ® . ž ‚Þb‚, MTBEº '‚ >î J"j ¢V † > ®º zbîš . "¾ö Ú æ~ &Ë’(Underground Storage Tank; UST)öB NAPLs (Non Aqueous Phase Liquids)‚ ®Òº F~ 5 Fšz bî~ * &ËWö &‚ žš –> ® . ß® "F² æ~&Ë’öB NAPLs~ *‚ ž‚ J"f Æ·~ ê¢ 2Z~ æ~>¢ J"Ò &ËWš. Ö ¸j '‚ ~ã^B‚ &v> ®º ;š . MTBEº >7öBº 7ªš, &>ªš, &î _f ¦F bîö ‡Oš –~ ¢Ú¾æ p †ž ³ê‚ šÿ~ ² B . ß® MTBE~ J"ö ~š ^B& ¢V> ® º æ~>öB~ šÒº ¸f Ïšê‚ žš žÚö † '˚ î > ® æ~>öB~ –ÿš æ BTEXz b"º Ò Ö š . >ïšÿöò jî¢ >ç šÿš Ö ‚B~, [~ æ~>ræ J"ʺ © b‚ –Ò> ® . š‚ žš MTBE¢ Ž‚ >BF & *ÂF ãÖ, BTEXzbf *Âæ6 ¦"öB º~ ~ MTBEº æ~> ~~¦ 5 [¦‚ {Ö, šÇ> Ú 7º*‚ æ~>¢ J"Ò &ËWš ¸j ©b‚ – Ò> ® . ëW'ž GšöB MTBEº *Ò, Ò²ö &‚ BzW ¶òº jç B‚B :& ìæò, vö 1,14). 14). 1,14). 1,6,11,12,14). 4,6-9). 6,10,12). 1). Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 37~44, 2003. 2.. ‡Oš† 5 þO» 2). ‡Oš† ‡Of v ç~ ãêšöB ¢Ú¾– ‚š _f ^‚ ‚š~ ښöB ¢Ú¾º bî~ »' 6º ³»*çb ‚ " > ® . W ‡OB~ ‡Of b ‡OB& bulk χb‚¦V «¶Ú~ ‡O*~‚ šÿ, ³»>º "; b‚ ‡O";f ¢N~ ³ ê‚ ¾2 > ® . Ñ êº b‡OB& ‡OB "*~ ‡ãïj ۚ bulkÏ ‡b‚¦V ‡OB~ ž¦ ‚šb‚ šÿ~º ê‚ ‡ OB~ ª¶Úÿö ~‚ {֚ "º‚ ·Ïš B . ‡ ãïj ۂ bî*f ç&'b‚ ¶Ò  † > ®b – š‚ B‚f ²ª >w– Úö v>j ~–¾  2.1..

(3) 2ê öæšÚ¢ šÏ‚ >wãÚö &‚ ’. ;[ ‡O ¢"öB~ vªj Â~ç‚ FæŽb‚Ž  F > ® . æ‚ ‡O³êº ‡OB «¶~ ž ¦ ‚š'ö jf~ ãê[ {֚ ‡O³ê~ B‚  êž ãÖ ‡OB~ ßWö Z&~ . ~ êº b‡OB& ‡OB~ ž¦‚šb‚¦V « ¶ Ú¦‚ šÿ~º ê‚ Ú~ *j ۂ {Ö" ~ ښj V¢ šÿ~º v ê‚ ¾*Ú '† > ®b– ''f ÿö ¢Ú ê † > ® . ‡Úç {Ö~ ³êº b‡OB ª¶f~ Ú ‚š"~ Ïòš Ï ª¶f~ Ïò" jv~ ç&' b‚ '  &;~ Z† r, ;æ bulk χj ۂ {Ö³êf ?  &;† > ®b– V¢B Nê~ 'Ë š – ޚ . >š Úç {Öf ښö ‡OB ê bî*š ¢Ú  † > ®b– ‚š~ ‡O ·ö 'Ëj Aº . æ‚ «¶* {Ö³êº ‡Úç {Ö " Úç {Öj ÿö J~¢ ‚ . «¶* { Öf ¢>'b‚ Nš æš Ã&~ b‡OB~ ª¶ïš æš 6²‚ . q êº b‡OB& ‡OB «¶~ ‚šöB bÒ z'b‚ ‡O>º ê‚ ‡OBf b‡OB~ ç^· ÏßWö V¢ š– &¦ª~ ‡O";öB ãê[ { Ö 6º «¶* {Öö jv~ Ö †š² ¢Ú  ê . ²ª‡OöBº v>ö ~‚ ;BKš ·Ï~ æ‚ b‡Obš Â~, {Öö ~~ – šÿ³ê¢ & æ– b‡Ob 5 ‡OB~ «~f ª¶~ šÿ³êö ~ ‚ {Ö ;êö V¢ æz‚ . 2.2.. 39. " zêRj >wB B–‚ . öòž š² ¦2f "‚ ÏÒ ªš; 6º 7îF ªš;öB W>–, ¦ê~ šWz, TBA~ î>zö ~š B–> Vê ‚ . MTBEº Table 1" ?f bÒz' ßWj &æ ® . ¢>'ž êz>² Wš ² ’,. NöB >BW~ Zï‡Ú‚ 6ê& Ô, &Wš–, Vf BW~ bbj ;W† > ® . ž êz> ², örš 5 rzRö &‚ Ϛê& j" ¸ ò ÚöB >ª‡> 5 bö ~‚ çªÒ ^B& ìb–, ß ® Kê&& ¸ CF~ B®"~ bWš ±j ŽÖ² zb 7 ¶ÿNÏ >BF V҂ ôš ÒÏ> ® .. þö ÒÏB MTBEº SupelcoÒ~ 99.99%~ Bê¢ &æº Standard 1000 mg(Neat)j j&“ 8š 18.2 Ωž î šN>‚ ’C~ ÒÏ~& . ÖF, 1 l Ïï 2¢Ê ’ö îš N>¢ jÚ Ê Standard 1 mgj Î& ÒÏ~  1000 mg/l~ ‚&ö‡j ò Ú ÒÏ~& . MTBE ªCö ÒÏ~V *š 1000 mg/l~ χj ’C~ 1, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100 mg/l ~ ‚&‡j B–~& . (isobutylene). öæšÚ  ’öB Òς öæšÚº ‚“¶öÒÒöB B A~b–, öæšÚ~ "º‚ Wªf Fig. 1" ?š  Z 5 WZ& 7ïj‚ £ 50.0%. š:¿š £ 27.5%, VªWªš £ 17.5%, ²ªš £ 5.0%‚ ¾æÒ . 2.2.2. þ Òò. 2.2.1 MTBE. º ¢>'b‚ jv' Nz‚ Ú*–šöB ;Ö W~ ·šN v~>æ ~ Ö/ ~öB š²¦2 MTBE. Table 1. Properties of MTBE1) Item Molecular Formula Molecular Weight (g/mole) Color Specific Gravity (at 20oC) Caloric Value (J/kg) Specific Heat (J/kg) Boiling Point (oC) Flash Point (oC) Ignition Point (oC) Vapor Pressure (Pa at 25oC) Solubility (% at 20oC). Properties CH3OC(CH3)3 88.14 Colorlessness 0.740 3.52 107 2.13 55.2 −28 224 32.659~33.546 4.8. Fig. 1. Composition of ground Tire3).. Ü. Fig. 2. Consistent Elements in the ground Tire14). Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 37~44, 2003.

(4) ;ç*ÁšÒ'Á‚ç¢. 40. öæšÚ~ z' Wªf Fig. 2ö ¾æÂ :f ?š 7ïj‚ ê²& £ 83.0%, >²& £ 7.0%, Ö²& £ 2.5%, š £ 1.2%, î²& £ 0.3%, ²ªš £ 6.0% ‚ ’W>Ú ® . ²ª ‡Oï; þö ÒÏ~V *ö BAf öæ šÚ~ «ê& ¢~æ pj Ú¢ šÏ~ ªÒ~& . 4® Ú¢ šÏ~ 檚 4.75 mm šçž öæšÚf 16 ® Ú¢ šÏ~ 檚 1.18 mm š~ž öæšÚ¢ ª Ò~ &j~& . öæšÚº 檚 4.75 mm šçž æšÚf 1.18 mm šç 4.75mm š~ž æšÚ, Ò 1.18 mm š~ž 3«j &j~& . Ò j&“ 8š 18.2 Ω ž îšN>‚ aÚ Çb" VªWªj B–~& . 105 CöB 24*ÿn š–Î êö ÒÏ~& . o. þ O» 2.3.1 MTBE ªC –š MTBE ªCf Ï ‚ Îúj ÒÏ~ Ï ºÂ~  ¯~& . Îúf J. T. BakerÒ~ º~³£ ªC Ïj ÒÏ~& . Îú 20 mlf ò 20 ml¢ 1:1‚ 40 ml Vialö If êö Vortex Mixer¢ šÏ~ £ 10 ª ÿn ºÂ‚ êö, £ 1* ÿn .r2 ºÂVöB .r2 ºÂj ~& . š‚ O»b‚ MTBE¢ º ‚ ê Îúj Capillary Column DB-5& J~B GC 2010(SHIMADZU, JAPAN)~ >² "šNz ¦ÂV (Flame Ionization Detector)‚ ;ï~&b–, š‚ ªC f SHIMADZUÒ~ GC solution programö ~š –; ~& .  þöB Òς Gas Chromatograph~ ªC –š f ¢" "«Nê¢ 250 C, J6~ Nê¢ 30 CöB  ·~ 10 C/minb‚ ßNB 100 Cræ ßNVb–, 2.3.. o. o. o. o. Table 2. Analytical Condition of MTBE by the Gas Chromatograph Items Column Injection Mode Injection Temperature Detector Temperature Column Temperature Carrier Gas Column Flow Rate Detector Sample Injection Volume. Conditions Capillary DB-5 (Agilent Technologies) Split Ratio : 50 250oC 310oC o 100oC 30 C o (10 C/min) He (99.999%) 1.2 ml/min FID (Flame Ionization Detector) 1 µl. . Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 37~44, 2003. Fig. 3. A Experimental System for the Adsorption Process. Nê¢ 310 C‚ –.~& .  þöB ÒÏB ªC–šf Table 2f ? . o. Detector. ²ª N‡O þ. þf öæšÚ~ MTBE~ ‡OßWj 2k~V *š ²ª þ" B 'Ïçö MTBE~ ‡OßWj J ‚ ¢" þb‚ ¾*Úê . ²ª þf öæšÚ~ ’Vö Vž ‡OßWj 2 k~V *š Ïïš £ 300 mlž BOD ÷j šÏ~&b –, MTBE ³ê¢ 10 mg/l, 25 mg/l, 50 mg/l‚ ’ª~. ~& . ‡O þf öæšÚ¢ BOD ÷ö Iæ pf blankf öæšÚ~ ’Vö V¢ ;{~² Z²¢ ÒÚ 5 g, 10 gj IÚ &j‚ ê MTBE χj Ij r ‚&‚  ³~² ~ >Bö ~‚ ¶ j ‚²‚b‚ ~&b–, Head-space¢ ‚²z >² ~& . MTBE¢ If BOD ÷j 25 C& Fæ>º “N v>Vö IÚ ï; ³ê& F rræ £ 48 *j v> ~& . v>‚ êö :‚ 40 ml ~ :šâö Îú" 1:1‚ Ï ºÂ‚ ê vortex mixing" .r2 ºÂ" ?f *¾Ò êö GC‚ ªC~ & . '' þöº Blank¢ ò Ú ~& . 2.3.2. o. ¢" þ öæšÚ~ MTBE~ ‡O î‚B  ßWj 2k~V *š FÒÒî‚ B Fig. 3" ?š çã 3 cm ^š 50 cm ~ ¢"j B·~& . B·B ¢"ö &jB öæšÚ¢ Ïê‚ êö micro tube pump¢ šÏ~ £ 2.5 ml/min ~ ³ê‚ 10 mg/l~ MTBE χj çË~‚ "«~&. . ¢"~ Öf Teflon tube¢ šÏ~& . ò j º ' ¢"j Û"~ ¾Jº χj 30 mlO Vialö 2.3.3.

(5) 2ê öæšÚ¢ šÏ‚ >wãÚö &‚ ’. 41. Table 3. The Result of Batch Test I Batch Group. Mass of Ground Rubber (g). Blank A1) A B2) B C3) C. 0.00 5.00 10.00 5.00 10.00 5.00 10.00. Initial Concentration of MTBE (mg/l) 10 mg/l 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00. Equilibrium Concentration (mg/l). Mass of MTBE Sorbed per Gram of Ground Rubber (mg/g). 8.75 7.86 6.16 8.06 7.59 8.16 7.19. 0.059 0.085 0.046 0.038 0.039 0.051. Initial Concentration of MTBE (mg/l) 25 mg/l 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 50 mg/l 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00. Equilibrium Concentr-ation (mg/l). Mass of MTBE sorbed per Gram of Ground Rubber (mg/g). 21.55 17.72 16.13 18.35 17.07 19.81 18.82. − 0.253 0.179 0.211 0.148 0.115 0.090. 46.17 38.26 34.21 46.17 40.66 41.22 37.06. − 0.522 0.395 0.364 0.290 0.327 0.301. Table 4. The Result of Batch Test II Batch Group. Mass of Ground Rubber (g). Blank A1) A B2) B C3) C. 0.00 5.00 10.00 5.00 10.00 5.00 10.00. Blank 0.00 A1) 5.00 A 10.00 B2) 5.00 B 10.00 C3) 5.00 C 10.00 1.18 mm 1) A : Tire Size 2) B : Tire Size 1.18 mm to 4.75 mm 3) C : Tire Size 4.75 mm. • —. ç7 ~&b–, ' òº Fïš 100 ml¢ Û"~&j rî j‚ ê ³ê¢ G;~& . Ö"¢ ªC† r &‚»j *' Fïb‚ ~  Ö"¢ ¾*‚ ¾æÚ  2"6 5  ÎNj G;~& . 3.. þ Ö". ²ª N‡O þ Ö" Table 3" 4º öæšÚ~ ’Vê‚ MTBE¢ 10 mg/l, 25 mg/l, 50 mg/l ¢ '' "«‚ çöB ''~ N‡ O³ê¢ G;~ ¾æÞ Ö" 8š . 1.18 mm š~~ 3.1. öæšÚ~ ãÖö 10 mg/l~ MTBE¢ ‡Oš Ö", öæšÚ g  ‚& 0.085 mgš ‡O>î . ž ’Vö jš £ 2V z ôš ‡O>îrj r > ®î . 6‚ 25 mg/l. 50 mg/l~ MTBE χb‚ þ š Ö"ê îR&æ‚, öæšÚ~ ’V& ·j>ƒ z ôf MTBE ¢ ‡O~& . MTBE 50 mg/lb‚ þ~&j r 1.18 mm š~~ öæšÚ~ g  ‚& ‡Oïf £ 0.5 mgš î . ž ’Vö jš £ 2V z ôš ‡O>îrj r > ®î . Table 5º Batch þÖ"¢ Æ&‚ Freundlich N‡ Oj ¾æÞ ©š . Freundlich f &ڂ Ôf ³ê Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 37~44, 2003.

(6) ;ç*ÁšÒ'Á‚ç¢. 42. Table 5. Experimental Values of the Freundlich Isotherm Parameters for Sizes of Tire Freundlich Isotherm KF 1/n 1.11 A1) 8.67 10−3 B2) 3.85 10−3 1.17 3.36 10−3 1.29 C3) 1) A : Tire Size 1.18 mm 2) B : Tire Size 1.18 mm to 4.75 mm 3) C : Tire Size 4.75 mm n= Group. Ü Ü Ü. • — Ïî" Nêö V¢ 8š ;šæº ç>. Correlation Coefficient 0.92 0.94 0.94. ~ 'öB '‚ š–, ¢>'b‚ 1/n8" KF8š š rº Freundlich ~ ‡O' ÚöB ¸f ‡OWj š–, KF8š · n8š š rº ‡O' Úö Ôf ‡OWj ž . 6‚ n8š ·j rº χ³êö V¢ ‡O ßûš æz~º– ³ê& ¸j rº ·^‚ ‡OW j š² B . ¢>'b‚ 1/n8š 0.1~0.5¢ r ‡Oš £² ¢Ú¾–, 1/n 8š 2šçž bîf  ‡OWš . öæšÚ~ ‡O þ Ö", ‡OBö &‚ Ïî~ ‡ Oïj ¾æÚº Freundlich æ>ž KF 8š öæšÚ ’V& &Ë ·f ©š ç&'b‚ ¸² ¾æÒb–, ¾ ^æ v &æ~ ãÖº jÝ~² ¾æÒ . šº "Úê ³êöB öæšÚ * îï  ‡OB MTBE~ ·š. ž ’V~ öæšÚ  1.18 mm š~~ ãÖ& z – ©j ~‚ .  ’V& ·j>ƒ z 9f ‚š'j &æ ®V r^b‚ ÒòB . ¢" þ Ö" MTBE 10 mg/l ¢ micro tube pump¢ šÏ~ 2.5 ml/min~ F³b‚ /~ FÂ>¢ 30 ml ¢ j~ Îúj šÏ~ Ï ºÂ‚ ê MTBE¢ ªC~& . Ò,  100 ml¢ F‚ êö  30 ml¢ j ~ ªC~,  100 ml¢ F‚ êö  ò¢ j~& . š O»j >~ *'Fïš £ 1200 3.2.. ml ¢ rræ MTBE 10 mg/l ¢ /~& . Table 6f ¢" þ Ö"¢ ¾æÞ ©š . öæšÚ¢ Ïê~æ p f ¢"j šÏ~ ÿ¢‚ –šb‚ :û þj ~ & .  Ö", 10 mg/l~ MTBE& ï £ 9.2 mg/l~ ³ê‚ F«>îrj r > ®î . š¢ :ûb‚ ’V& 1.18 mm š~ž öæšÚf  ž~ v &æ «~~ æªj &ê öæšÚ¢ ¢"ö Ï ê~ þj ~& . 1.18 mm š~~ öæšÚ¢ çã 3 cm, ^š 50 cm~ ¢"ö 145 gj Ïê~& . 1.18 mm šç 4.75 mm~ ãÖº 165 g, Ò 4.75 mm šçž ãÖº £ 185 g~ öæšÚ¢ Ïê‚ ê þj. ~& . öæšÚ~ ’Vö Vž 2"6ræ~ *' Fïj G ;š  Ö", ^ &æ ãÖ Îv& j݂ Vö 2" & šÚrrj r > ®î . *' Fïš 550 ml¢ r 2"& ·>î . 2" *ræ~ ï ³êº 1.18 mm š~~ öæšÚº £ 7.06 mg/lšîb–, 1.18 mm šç 4.75 mm~ ãÖº £ 7.51 mg/l šî . 4.75 mm šç~ ãÖº £ 7.37 mg/l‚ ¾æÒ . 2" *ræ~ ï³êf Batch þöB ’‚ Freundlich Isothermj šÏ~ ‡Oïj êÖ~ Table 6ö ‚*~& . 1.18 mm š~~ öæšÚ& 1.18 mm š ç 4.75 mm, 4.75 mm šçž öæšÚ £ 2V~ ö æšÚ g  MTBE ‡Oïj & . šº „B ’‚ Freundlich Isotherm~ KF 8" jfŽj r > ® . C vªö &‚ ï MTBE~ ³ê¢ êÖ~ B ‡OB ·j êÖ~& . &Ë ·f öæšÚöB g  £ 0.031 mg~ MTBE¢ ‡O~&rj r > ®î . 6 ‚ ¾^æ v B «~~ öæšÚ~ ãÖº Îv g  £ 0.07 mg~ MTBE¢ ‡O~& . Freundlich Isothermj šÏ~ ’‚ Sorption Capacity f B ï ³ê G;j ‚ ê êÖB MTBE~ ‡O ïj jv~ Utilization Efficiency¢ êÂ~& . öæ. Table 6. The Result of Column Test Equilibrium Sorption Total Mass of Utilization Sorption Capacity Capacity at Average Accumulated Ground Efficiency at Breakthrough Batch Group Influent Concentration Volume Rubber (%) (mg/g) (mg/g) (ml) (g) Initial Concentration of MTBE : 10 mg/l &, Average Inlet Concentration of MTBE : 9.21 mg/l Blank 0 1200 − − − 145 1200 0.086 0.031 36.0 A1) B2) 160 1200 0.045 0.007 15.6 3) C 185 1200 0.044 0.007 16.4 Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 37~44, 2003.

(7) 2ê öæšÚ¢ šÏ‚ >wãÚö &‚ ’. 43. b‚ þ~&j r 1.18 mm š~~ öæ šÚ~ g  ‚& ‡Oïf £ 0.5 mgb‚ ¾æÒ . 6 ‚, Freundlich æ>ž KF 8f öæšÚ~ ’V& ·f ©öB &Ë – 8j & . 2. ^ &æ ’V~ öæšÚ Îv, ¢"j ۂ *' Fïš £ 550 ml¢ r¦V 2"& ·>î . 2" * ræ~ ï ³êº 1.18 mm š~~ öæšÚº £ 7.06 mg/l šîb–, 1.18 mm šç 4.75 mm~ ãÖº £ 7.51 mg/l šî . 4.75 mm šç~ ãÖº £ 7.37 mg/l ‚ ¾ æÒ . 3. B ¢" þj ۚ 1.18 mm š~~ öæšÚ& 1.18 mm šç 4.75 mm, 4.75 mm šçž öæšÚ. £ 2V~ öæšÚ g  MTBE ‡Oïj & . šº „B ’‚ Freundlich Isotherm~ KF 8" jfŽj r > ® . 4. C vªö &‚ ï MTBE~ ³ê¢ êÖ~. B ‡OB ·j êւ Ö", &Ë ·f öæšÚöB g  £ 0.031 mg~ MTBE¢ ‡O~&rj r > ®î ¾^æ v B «~~ öæšÚ~ ãÖº Îv g  £ 0.07 mg~ MTBE¢ ‡O~& . 5. Freundlich Isothermj šÏ~ ’‚ Sorption Capacityf B ï ³ê G;j ‚ ê êÖB MTBE ~ ‡Oïj jv~ šÏ ÎNj êÖ š Ö", 1.18 mm š~~ öæšÚ& £ 36%, ¾^æ v &æ «~~ öæšÚº '' 15.6 %f 16.4%~ ÎNj ¾æÚî . šf ?f þ Ö"‚ 6† r, öæšÚ~ ’V& ·j>ƒ  ‚š'š Ã&~ MTBE¢ ‡O† > ®º ËKf z ’  † > ® . Ò MTBE~ ‡O W ˚ Vš~ ‚Wêö jš ÎÚææò, öæšÚ~ ¾ª jÏ" Ò jÏj 6n‚ š, MTBE‚ J"B æ~> ~ ‡O î‚ öæšÚ~ ‚Ïf ãB'b‚ê, ~ã' b‚ê F›† > ®bÒ¢ 'B . 6‚ Pilot ξ *ËöB, Air-Sparging š¾ Bioremediation" ?f ž In-Situ »" 'b‚ 'ÏB š, B–ÎN Ëç" ?f ÿ> çßÎ"(synergy effect)¢ V&† > ®º  ’ê jº~   . MTBE 50 mg/l. •. Fig. 4. The Plots of Column Test Results ( 1.18 mm).. šÚº 1.18 mmš~~ ©š £ 36% ~ ÎNj ¾æÚî , ¾^æ v «~~ öæšÚº '' 15.6%f 16.4%~ ÎNj ¾æÚî . š ÎNf B šç'ž Batch þ Ö"f ¢" þÖ"¢ jv‚ ©b‚ š ÎNf *Ëö B 'φ > ®º &ËWj ¾æÚ " ® . B'b ‚ *Ëö ‡O î‚ öæšÚ¢ ÒÏ~¶ ‚ š, MTBE žö ž «~~ J"bî" ?š šÒ~ ®º ãÖ¾, b'ž >w~ ÆÒW, ¦æ~ ßWj Ϫ® Jš¢~æò, 1.18 mm š~~ öæšÚ& &æº MTBE bî~ ‡OßW" ÎNf Ϫ® 'Ï &ËWš ®  'B .. r Fig. 4º ' ’V& ž öæšÚ~ ¢" Ú~ MTBE ‡Oj ¾æÚ ® . 5.. ֆ 5 V.  ’öBº &ºÖ ò~ ŽÖ²B‚ Î&>Ú ú ê~ VËj BF~ &VJ"bî~ Bj Î"'b‚ 6²Êæò, ž ‚Þb‚º >BF~ *‚ žš Æ · 5 æ~>~ J"j FB† > ®º bîž MTBE (Methyl tertiary Butyl Ether)¢ &ç bî‚ ~ öæ šÚ¢ *ËÚ J"æ~> ;z » 7 ~¾ž >wãÚ »~ ‡O î‚ ÒÏj ï&~& . ²ª þj Û šB ’V& ž öæšÚ~ MTBE ‡O ßWj N‡ Ob‚ ï&~& . 6‚ ¢" þj ۚB 2"F (Breakthrough Curve)j Ò šÏ ÎNj ’~&b– ֆf r" ? . 1. ²ª þ~ Ö"¢  N‡Ob‚ ï& š  Ö", Freundlich Isothermš &Ë '~&b– 1.18 mm š~~ öæšÚ~ ãÖö 10 mg/l ~ MTBE¢ ‡O š Ö", öæšÚ g  ‚& 0.085 mgš ‡O>î .. ^^ò ‚“~ã;kÁï&’ö, òÎ&B MTBE~ *šW 5 &Ò jºWö &‚ ^¾, (2002). 2. ¶êÞ, ‡O , (ö&: Suzuki M.), ;JÂ6Ò, (2000). 3. ’¶, fCj, B'z, Fÿ&, “öæšÚ š~²'öB B >º Òf VV&ÊöB~ ëWJ"bî~ ;ï”, ‚“Æ 1.. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 37~44, 2003.

(8) ;ç*ÁšÒ'Á‚ç¢. 44. ϲ ¢^÷. , 13(1), pp. 213-220, (1993). 4. Kim, J.Y., Park, J.K. and Edil, T.B., “Sorption of Organic Compounds in the Aqueous Phase into Tire Rubber” Journal of Environmental Engineering, 123(9), pp. 827-835, (1997). 5. Park, J.K. Kim, J.Y., and Edil, T.B., “Mitigation organic compound movement in landfills by shredded tires.” Water Environment Research. 68(1), pp. 4-10, (1996). 6. Savolainen H., Pfaffli P., and Elovaara, E., “Biochemical effects of MTBE in extended vapor exposure in rats”, Arch. Toxicol. 57(4) pp. 285-288, (1995). 7. Kershaw, D.S., Kulik, C., and Pamukcu, S., “Ground Rubber : Sorption media for ground water containing benzene and o-xylene.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironment Engineering. 123(4), pp. 324-334, (1997). 8. Al-Tabbaa, A. and Aravinthan, T., “Natural clay-shredded tire mixtures as landfill barrier materials.” Waste Management 18(1) pp. 9-16, (1998). 9. Smith, C.C., Anderson, W.F., and Freewood, R.J., “Evaluation of shredded lyre chips as sorption media for passive treatment walls”, Engineering Geology, 60, pp. 256-261, (2000). 10. Willson, G.J., Druder, A., Suidan, M,T., and Venosa, A.D.,. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 37~44, 2003. 11.. 12.. 13.. 14.. 15.. “Biodegradation Kinetics of MTBE in Laboratory Batch and Continuous Flow Reactors.” Journal of Environmental Engineering. 128(9), pp. 824-829, (2002). Shih, T.C., Wangpaichitr, M., and Suffet, M., “Evaluation of Granular Activated Carbon Technology for the Removal of MTBE form Drinking Water.” Water Research 37, pp. 375385, (2002). Wihelm, M.J., Adams. V.D., Curtis J.G., and Middlebrock, E.J., “Carbon Adsorption and Air-Stripping Removal of MTBE form River Water.” Journal of Environmental Engineering. 128(9), pp. 813-823, (2002). Guerin, T.F., Horner, S., McGovern, T., and Davey, B., “An Application of PRB Technology to Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Groundwater.” Water Research, 36, pp. 1524, (2002). US EPA, Achieving Clean Air and Clean Water; The Report of the Blue Ribbon Panel on Oxygenates in Gasoline. EPA 420-R-99-021, (1999). Gunasekara, A.S., Donovan, J.A., and Xing, B., “Ground discarded tires remove naphthalene, toluene, and mercury from water.” Chemosphere, 41(8), pp. 1155-1160, (2000)..

(9)

참조

관련 문서

In this research, there is no consistent result that the outsourcing can give effects on business performance, but most of hypothesis indicates that

36 SEM Microphotographs of the Electrical Electrodes of the Burn Resistor PCB ((a): Before Vibration and Thermal Vacuum Test, (b): After Vibration and Thermal

In short, the finding of the study indicated that the students' interest, satisfaction, and participation in English are improved as a result of

As a result, exhibition booth development was carried out the basis of the study results. On that account, the result of the exhibition booth

In contrast, Chiropractic has shown better result than sports massage in the range of motion of the shoulder joint, Thoracic Scapular rhythm test, and the

2. The finite element is calculating using tension test of uni-direction 0° and 90°, compression test of uni-direction 0° and 90° and shear test results and, the results

The result based on the students’ survey showed that the majority of students had rarely experienced learning punctuation, and even the experienced

‰ Sequential logic circuits’ outputs react to the current values on the input wires and to the past history of values on those same input wires....