• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT OF A RANGE HOOD SIROCCO FAN BY CFD FLOW ANALYSIS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT OF A RANGE HOOD SIROCCO FAN BY CFD FLOW ANALYSIS"

Copied!
8
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

한 병 윤,

*1

박 진 우,

1

이 명 수,

2

박 형 구

3

P ERFORMANCE I MPROVEMENT OF A R ANGE H OOD S IROCCO F AN BY CFD F LOW A NALYSIS B.Y. Han, *1 J.W. Park, 1 M.S. Lee 2 and H.K. Park 3

This study is to investigate the air flow around a sirocco fan which is used in a range hood. The main object of the study is to improve the flow rate of the fan by analysis of unsteady 3-dimensional incompressible flow.

Overall analysis is carried out using CFD method. For this, we used a commercial code, SC/Tetra, and used a sliding mesh method to give the same condition as an actual state.

First, verification of the CFD results is done by comparing the experimental data with the numerical data for the suction flow rate. It is confirmed that two results are well consistent. Then for the improvent of flow rate, the effect of shape factors such as diameter ratio of fan, geometry of case, cut-off aperture and guide angle of case exit on the suction flow rate was considered. Especially, for a new design of housing, the principle of Archimedes spiral was used. The overall analysis was applied to a new design of housing, and the result showed an increase of flow rate by 10.7%.

Key Words : (CFD), (Unsteady Flow), 3 (3-D Analysis), (Sirocco Fan),

(Range Hood)

* Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected]

1.

. ,

.

. ,

. ,

(range hood) .

[1-2]

(sirocco fan) .

(backward curved centrifugal fan) ,

, [3-4].

. [5] STAR-CD

2

, [6]

. Morinushi[7], Raj and Swim[8], Maeng[9]

.

.

SC/Tetra

(2)

Fig. 1 Schematic of the sirocco fan

fan

outer diameter

0.161m inner diameter

0.140m

number of blades  50

blade width  0.065m

inlet blade angle

115°

outlet blade angle

170°

housing

inlet diameter  0.135m

outlet area 0.157m × 0.087m Table 1 Geometry of the Range Hood

Fig. 2 Schematic of the experiment apparatus

Fig. 2 Schematic of the experiment apparatus 3

.

2.

2.1

Fig. 1

Table 1 .

Fig. 2

, ,

. 4

156.6mm, 2600mm

. ( ~U )

.

2.2

1000 rpm (Mach Number)

0.3 .

Navier-Stokes

, .

 



  (1)

      



  

   

  

 

   

(2)

(1) , (2) .

, 2-

. 2- Standard   

.

. Wilcox[10]    2- viscous sublayer

[11].

SST(Shear-StressTransport)    .

(3)

(a) Total grid system (b) Blades Fig. 3 Computational grids

      



  

    



    (3)

      

   

 

 

     



 

   

   

(4)

(3), (4) SST    .

, ,

.

2.3

CFD

. (MRF, multiple

reference frame method) (sliding mesh method) .

.

SIMPLEC .

2.4

.

. SC/Tetra Pre-Process

100

, 20

. Fig. 3(a)

, Fig. 3(b) .

, Free Stream U ,

0.99U δ .

Blasius solution .

   

   (5)

, 20    ×  

,

   , x

0.007m . ,

0.4mm ,

,   ∼   

. , 3

.

, 600~1000rpm

0.000333 , no-slip

.

(4)

Fig. 4 Pressure and flow rate

Fig. 5 Flow coefficient and head coefficient

Fig. 6 Comparison of flow rate and rotation speed between experiment and computation

(a) logarithmic spiral (b) Archimedean spiral Fig. 7 Logarithmic spiral and Archimedean spiral

degree() radius() degree() radius()

60  87.88mm 240  113.01mm

90  92.07mm 270  117.20mm

120  96.25mm 300  121.39mm

150  100.44mm 330  125.58mm

180  104.63mm 360  129.76mm

210  108.82mm

Table 2 Specification of the Housing

3.

3.1

Fig. 4 -

- .

. Fig. 5

. (  ) (  )

[12].

   

 (6)

  

 

   ×  (7)

,  ,  , 

,  ,  .

Fig. 5

.

. Fig. 6

.

(5)

Fig. 8 Cut-off gap

(a) 0.19D

2

(b) 0.08D

2

Fig. 9 Blade passage flows

Fig. 10 Shape of housing

1.6%

7.8%, 14.8%

.

.

.

, .

3.2

.

. Fig. 7(a) (logarithmic

spiral) .

. 

(8) .

    (8)

Fig. 7(b) (Archimedean spiral)

.

 

.  (9)

.

     (9)

,  ,  , 

.

[13]

,

.

 8 

 Table 2 .

3.3

  0.8~0.9 .

[14]   

0.9 0.9

0.87 0.88 .

(6)

Fig. 11 Comparison of pressure between original type(up) and modified type(down)

(a) Guide vane(5 degree) type (b) Straight type Fig. 12 Comparison of outlet shape effect

3.4 (cut-off) (Fig. 8) .

,

.

Morinushi[15] (9) .

    (9)

    .

(9) .

Fig. 9  50 70

( ) . Fig.

9(a)   50

,  

70 .

  .

3.5 Fig. 10

R10.8mm R3.2mm

. Fig. 11

, 0.6%

.

Table 2 .

4.4% ,

10.7% .

 7

1.6%

8.3%

.

.

 8

Fig. 12(a)   

5 Fig. 12(b)

8%

. Figs. 13,14

(7)

Fig.13 Velocity vector of guide vane type(5 degree)

Fig.14 Pressure field of guide vane type(5 degree)

Fig.15 Velocity vector of straight type

Fig.16 Pressure field of straight type

, Figs. 15,16 .

4.

SC/Tetra . . 1)

.

.

2) ,

.

3)    

2 ,

. 4)

8~10%

(8)

.

5)    5

8% .

6)

.

.

[1] 2001, Kang, Y.M. and Han, H.T., "A study on the capture efficiency of kitchen exhaust system with make up airflow configurations," Korean Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Engineering, 2001-W-079, pp.596-599.

[2] 2001, Lee, H.J. and Jeong, Y.T., "Development of Improved Kitchen Ventilation System," Korean Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Engineering, 2001-W-090, pp.556-558.

[3] 1999, Park, K.-J., Lee, S.-H. and Son, B.-J., "A Study on Low-Noise and High-Efficiency Sirocco Fan Development,"

Journal of Fluid Machinery, Vol.2, pp.46-56.

[4] 1999, Kim, K.-H., Park, K.-C. and Lee, S., "Measurement and Prediction of Aerodynamics Noise from Sirocco Fans,"

Journal of Fluid Machinery, Vol.2, pp.57-64.

[5] 1999, , , , , , “

,” , 2 , 1

, pp.43-49.

[6] 1998, , , , , “

3 Navier-Stokes ,”

, pp.42-48.

[7] 1987, Morinushi, K., "The Influence of Geometric Parameters on F. C. Centrifugal Fan Noise," Transactions of the ASME, Vol.109, pp.227-234.

[8] 1981, Raj, D. and Swim, W.B., "Measurements of the Mean Flow Velocity and Velocity Flutuations at the Exit of an FC Centrifugal Fan Rotor," Transaction of the ASME, Vol.103, pp.393-399.

[9] 2000, , , , , “ /

,”

B , 24 9 , pp.1139-1147.

[10] 1993, Wilcox, D.C., Turbulence Modeling for CFD, DCW Industries, Inc..

[11] 1999, , , , “SST

,”

, , pp.131-136.

[12] 2004, , , , , , “

,”

, pp.572-577.

[13] 2008, , , , , , ,

[14] 1997, , , , “Neural Network

,” ‘97

, pp.137-144.

[15] 1991, Morinushi, "Noise Source of a Multiblade Fan,"

, 57 , 543 , pp.3837-3844.

수치

Fig. 2 Schematic of the experiment apparatus
Fig. 6 Comparison of flow rate and rotation speed between  experiment and computation
Fig. 9 Blade passage flows
Fig. 11 Comparison of pressure between original type(up) and  modified type(down)

참조

관련 문서

_____ culture appears to be attractive (도시의) to the

It considers the energy use of the different components that are involved in the distribution and viewing of video content: data centres and content delivery networks

After first field tests, we expect electric passenger drones or eVTOL aircraft (short for electric vertical take-off and landing) to start providing commercial mobility

1 John Owen, Justification by Faith Alone, in The Works of John Owen, ed. John Bolt, trans. Scott Clark, "Do This and Live: Christ's Active Obedience as the

Operation of gear, vane, piston pumps Flow rate delivered by pumps.. Flow rate

Bactericidal effect of photocatalytic reactor depending on the UV-A illumination time and flow rate of V.. Bactericidal effect of photocatalytic reactor

 management of the flow of information, products, and services across management of the flow of information, products, and services across a network of customers,

„ An obvious objective in the design of digital VLSI circuits is the minimization of silicon area per logic gate. Fan-In and Fan-Out Fan In