S
m; c " e à Ã Å Ò Þ À W ¥ M X ê sT + b Ç \ Æ k Ó À W ¥ ¤ X ¢ä ì È ü Glauber Æ U Ø Ò Þ] K ¡X ì Ä Ising { ¢¨ | ; c" e8 ý + s Ò Ö ¨ ôV ê s: à X Ø? _³ oz º ¹ Å mS ó o Þ vs. Master U ê sX N ËÅ k Ä U ê s0 n É
¡) o £ Ó ∗
Ø
æ· ¡ ¤ @ / < Æ § l íõ < Æ ½ ¨ è x 9 Ó ü t o < Æõ , ' õ AÅ Ò 361-763 (2006¸ 9 Z 4 15{ 9 ~ Ã Î6 £ §)
r
ç ß \ " f 1 l x H l © s 9e H Á ºô Ç# 3 0 A Glauber î r1 l x < Æ ¸4 S q` ¦ Û ¼' (Master)
~
½ Ó& ñ d Ü ¼ Ð ] X H ô Ç# % 3 É r Tom´ e ü < de Oliveira_ ~ ½ Ó& ñ d õ 7 H _ º ú Ð í ß r Ð 3 x \ " f % 3 É r l 6 £ § (magnetic hysteresis) / B G ` ¦ q § % i . Ä ºo H s [ þ t 6 £ §/ B M s é ß í H ô Ç r ç ß _ F » ¡ ¤' \ _ K " f
'
aº t Ö ¦ Ã º \ O 6 £ §` ¦ µ 1 Ï| % i . Õ ªo ¦ ¿ º 6 £ § ¦ s _ t ) a 0 A © s [ þ t` ¦ ' a t Ö ¦ Ã º e
H ¦o e s S X % i .
PACS numbers: 05.10.Ln, 05.50.+q, 05.70.Jk
Keywords: 7 H _ º ú Ð í ß r Ð 3 x, Glauber î r1 l x < Æ, 6 £ § & ³ ©
I. " e  ] Ø
6 £ § (hysteresis) & ³ © [1–3] É r > _ ¸% \ ¼ # F ÷ &
#
Q e . s & ³ © É r # Qt B j m 7 £ § Ü ¼ Ð Â Ò' Ò q tl H X
<, : £ ¤ y t è ß # Q K 1 l x î ß r ç ß \ " f 1 l x H l
© _ % ò ¾ Ó A e H Ó ü t o > \ " f { 9 # Q H 1 l x§ 4 < Æ& h 6
£ § (dynamic hysteresis) s @ /é ß ô Ç < É ª p \ ¦ = å J% 3 [4]. s 1
l x§ 4 < Æ& h 6 £ § É r q ¨ î + þ A : x > % i < Æ\ " f s : r& h Ü ¼ Ð ] X H
l © / 'î r õ ] j Ð · ú 94 R e .
#
Q ½ ¨ [ þ t É r < ÊÃ º F G ô Ç& h Ü ¼ Ð a % v É r ` O Û ¼° ú
É
r r ç ß \ " f 1 l x H l © _ & h 6 x \ _ K " f Ò q t l
H 1 l x§ 4 < Æ& h 6 £ § s H Û ¼ 2 ; ¸4 S q\ @ /K " f
½
¨\ ¦ ô Ç e . Û ¼ 2 ;> 1 l x l © \ _ K " f 1 l x
| ¨
c M : > _ \ P % i < Æ& h ì ø Í6 £ x É r # Qï r 1 l x l © Ð 0 A
© s t ÷ & H l o (magnetization)_ ¢ - a o 1 l x Ü ¼ Ð
×
¼ Qè ß . s Qô Ç t ) a ì ø Í6 £ x s 1 l x§ 4 < Æ& h 6 £ § _ l " é ¶ s
9 l oü < l © _ 6 £ § / B G Ü ¼ Ð è ß . s Q ô
Ç 6 £ § & ³ © _ ½ ¨\ Û ¼' (Master) ~ ½ Ó& ñ d [5] ] X H
~
½ ÓZ O ` ¦ s 6 x # Tom´e ü < de Oliveira [6] % 6 £ § Ü ¼ Ð s
: r& h Ü ¼ Ð ½ ¨ô Ç ¨ î ç H © Û ¼ 2 ; ¸4 S q` ¦ ] jü @ ¦ H 7 H _ º
ú
Ð(MC) í ß r Ð 3 x [7] s  ú ª É r # 3 0 A Û ¼ 2 ; ¸4 S q\ " f_ 1 l x
§
4 < Æ& h 6 £ §` ¦ ½ ¨ H X < F g# 3 0 A > æ ¼# e .
Ä
ºo H { 9 _ ½ ¨ [8]\ " f, Á ºô Ç # 3 0 A Glauber î r1 l x
< Æ& h Ising ¸4 S q [9] [10] [11]` ¦ : x K " f MC í ß r Ð 3 x _ r
ç ß õ 5 Å q& h Û ¼' (Master) ~ ½ Ó& ñ d _ r ç ß s _
∗
E-mail: [email protected]
'
a > \ ¦ ¸ ô Ç e . Õ ª õ r ç ß _ F » ¡ ¤' \ ¦ +
" f s [ þ t s " f Ð q Y V < Ê` ¦ Ð e . s \ ¦Á º÷ &# Q Ä
ºo _ ½ ¨\ ¦ r ç ß \ " f 1 l x H l © s 2 ;
â
Ä º\ S X © % i H X <, Z t ³ 1 Ñ> ¸ MC í ß r Ð 3 x Ü ¼ Ð % 3 É r
6 £ § / B G õ Û ¼' ~ ½ Ó& ñ d ` ¦ s 6 x # % 3 É r Tom´ e ü < de Oliveira [6] ~ ½ Ó& ñ d Ü ¼ Ð Â Ò' % 3 É r 6 £ § / B G s F » ¡ ¤'
)
a r ç ß ë ß Ü ¼ Ð " f Ð ' a ÷ &t · ú §6 £ §` ¦ µ 1 Ï| % i . s [ þ t s
õ ÷ &t · ú §Ü ¼ MC í ß r Ð 3 x É r z ´] jü < Á º ' a
>
\ O # Q4 R Ó ü t o & h _ p \ ¦ { t 3 l w > ÷ &# Q ë H ] j ) a
.
Õ
ªA " f : r ½ ¨\ " f H # Qb G> s [ þ t l 6 £ § / B G ` ¦
' a t Ö ¦ Ã º e H t \ @ /K " f / B N Â Ò l Ð ô Ç .
II. S m; c " e à Ã Å Ò Þ À W ¥ M X ê s5 ; c" e8 ý
¤ X ¢ä ì È ü Æ U Ø Ò Þ] K ¡X ì Ä Ising { ¢¨ | ; c å ¾ Ë X ¢ Tom´ e Ñ ÷ de Oliveira8 ý ' [ U ê sX N ËÅ k ÄX ì Ä ± n É ¿ R <
r
ç ß \ " f 1 l x H l © ? /\ " f_ Á ºô Ç# 3 0 A Ising ¸4 S q [12] É r A _ Hamiltonian [6]Ü ¼ Ð & ñ _ ) a .
H = − J 2N
N
X
i,j=1
s
is
j− h(t)
N
X
i=1
s
i. (1)
#
l " f s
i H ¶ ú ½ Ó(lattice)0 Au i\ " f ±1° ú כ` ¦ t H Ising Û
¼ 2 ; Ã º, J H ª (+) Â Ò ñ_ À D K ½ + Ë © Ã º, N É r 8 ú x Û
¼ 2 ; > hà ºs ¦, r ç ß \ " f 1 l x H l © h(t) =
h
0cos(ωt) \ " f h
0 H l © ; ¤ Õ ªo ¦ ω H y 1 l x à º
-381-
s
. y 1 l x à º 0{ 9 M :, s ¸4 S q É r ¨ î + þ A © I \ " f βJ = 1.0 © $ í \ " f y © $ í Ü ¼ Ð H e > : r ¸s .
Ä
ºo H s ¸4 S q_ ¸ H Û ¼ 2 ;s ¢ - a y & ñ § > =ô Ç q ¨ î + þ A
© I \ " f Ø ¦ µ 1 Ï # > _ l o \ P & h s ¢ - a õ & ñ ` ¦ u
" f Ð# Å Ò H 1 l x & ³ © ` ¦ ¸ l Ð ô Ç . s 3 l q& h
`
¦ 0 AK " f H Tom´ e ü < de Oliveira [6]_ ~ ½ Ó& ñ d s j þ t ¸
e
. Õ ª[ þ t É r Û ¼' ~ ½ Ó& ñ d õ A _ Glauber s S X Ò ¦ q
Ö ¦
W (s
i→ −s
i) = 1
2τ
0[1 − s
itanh(βE
i)], (2)
\
¦ s 6 x # \ P % i < Æ& h F G ô Ç\ " f 6 £ § õ ° ú É r q ¨ î + þ A l
o m(t) = P
Ni=1
< s
i(t) > /N _ r ç ß & h od ` ¦ Ä »
¸ % i .
τ
0d
dt m(t) = −m(t) + tanh[β{J m(t) + h(t)}]. (3)
#
l " f τ
0 H Glauber î r1 l x < Æ_ r ç ß & h ' ¸\ ¦ [ O & ñ H r
ç ß é ß 0 A, E
i= (J/N ) P
Nj=1
s
j+ h(t), β = 1/k
BT H : r
¸_ % i à ºs .
Ä
ºo H ξ = ωt, K = βJ Õ ªo ¦ Ω = ωτ
0° ú É r " é ¶ s
\ O
H Ó ü t o | ¾ Ó` ¦ + " f 0 A_ ~ ½ Ó& ñ d ` ¦ 6 £ § õ ° ú s j þ t à º e
.
Ω d
dξ m(ξ) = −m(ξ) + tanh[K{m(ξ) + h(ξ)
J }]. (4)
"
é
¶ g Ë :& h Ü ¼ Ð d (5) H 6 £ § õ ° ú É r + þ AI _ Û ¦ s \ ¦
.
m(ξ) = P (ξ − φ), (5)
#
l " f P H # Q " Å Òl < ÊÃ º\ ¦ ? / ¦ φ H ü @Â Ò 1 l x
l © \ @ /ô Ç l o_ t ) a 0 A © ` ¦ · p .
: r ½ ¨\ " f, < m(ξ) >\ ' a ô Ç d (5) H Runge-Kutta 4 Û ¦ s \ ¦ + " f à ºu & h Ü ¼ Ð Û ¦% 3 . Á º " é ¶ _ r ç ß ç ß
ξ H 0.01 Ð × þ Ù þ ¡ H X <, & ñ S X $ í õ | > í ß r ç ß é ß > _
¸ o\ ¦ 0 AK " f s . ² D G è& h ¸ ú 2 £ § ¸ H 10
−8s ? /s
¦, ¸ H r ç ß \ @ / # 4 o à º s © _ à ºu & ñ S X $ í s Ä
»t ÷ & ¸2 ¤ % i .
III. S m; c " e à Ã Å Ò Þ À W ¥ M X ê s5 ; 0" e8 ý
¤ X ¢ä ì È ü Æ U Ø Ò Þ] K ¡X ì Ä Ising { ¢¨ | ; c å ¾ Ë X ¢ MC
¹
Å mS ó o Þ ± n É ¿ R <
: r ½ ¨\ " f H Û ¼' ~ ½ Ó& ñ d & h ] X H \ 6 x ô Ç Glauber î r1 l x < Æõ { 9 ' a$ í ` ¦ Ä »t l 0 AK " f MC í ß
r
Ð 3 x \ Glauber ! l rZ O (algorithm)` ¦ 6 x l Ð ô Ç . ¸
H Û ¼ 2 ;s 0 A Ð & ñ § > =K e H íl ¸| Ü ¼ Ð Â Ò' Ø ¦ µ 1 Ï
#
¶ ú ½ Ó 0 Au i\ ¦ × þ ô Ç Ê ê τ
0= 1 Ð [ O & ñ ¦ d (2)_
s S X Ò ¦ q Ö ¦ W (s
i→ −s
i)\ ¦ > í ß ô Ç .
6 £ § Ü ¼ Ð R ∈ (0, 1) è ß Ã º\ ¦ µ 1 ÏÒ q tr v ¦, W (s
i→
−s
i) > R s s
i\ ¦ −s
i Ð õ H . Õ ªX O t · ú § É r â Ä º\
H D h Ðî r ¶ ú ½ Ó 0 Au \ ¦ × þ # ° ú É r õ & ñ ` ¦ N − 1
÷
&Û ¦ s ô Ç . Ä ºo H s כ ` ¦ Û ¼ 2 ;{ © 1 MC é ß > (MCS/S)
¦ Â ÒØ Ô 9, s כ ` ¦ MC í ß r Ð 3 x \ " f é ß 0 A r ç ß Ü ¼ Ð
H .
: r ½ ¨_ MC í ß r Ð 3 x \ " f H 200Z O _ íl è ß Ã º C
\ P
` ¦ G 6 x % i ¦, % 6 £ § \ H > _ ¸ H Û ¼ 2 ;[ þ t s 0 A Ð & ñ
§ >
= ¸2 ¤ % i . 1 MCS/S , < m(t) >\ ¦ l 2 ¤ % i Ü
¼ 9 s õ & ñ É r 1,000 ì ø Í4 ¤ % i .
IV. Tom´ e Ñ ÷ de Oliveira8 ý ' [ U ê sX N ËÅ k ÄX ì Ä
± n
É ¿ R <Ê Ý MC ¹ Å mS ó o Þ8 ý å ¾ Ë4
· ú
¡ ½ ¨ [8]\ " f Ä ºo H MC í ß r Ð 3 x _ r ç ß t
M C_ é
ß 0 A MCS/Sü < 5 Å q& h Û ¼' ~ ½ Ó& ñ d _ r ç ß t s _
' a > \ ¦ ¸ % i . 7 £ ¤, MC í ß r Ð 3 x Ü ¼ Ð Â Ò' % 3
É
r l o « Ñ\ " f l o ¨ î + þ A\ ¸² ú l f _
° ú כ\ K { © H : £ ¤$ í r ç ß ` ¦ ½ ¨ ¦, ° ú É r l o ° ú כ
`
¦ t H : £ ¤$ í r ç ß ` ¦ Tom´ e ü < de Oliveira [6]_ ~ ½ Ó& ñ d
_ Ã ºu Û ¦ s \ " f ½ ¨ t
M C= αt s . # l " f α = α(βJ, h/J, N ) É r : £ ¤$ í r ç ß _ q \ ¦ · p .
ô
Ǽ # , MC í ß r Ð 3 x \ " f_ y 1 l x à º ω
M CÛ ¼'
~
½ Ó& ñ d ] X H \ " f_ y 1 l x à º ω\ q Y V Ù ¼ Ð ü @Â Ò l
© _ y 1 l x à º H & h ] X ô Ç r ç ß é ß 0 A\ ¦ l ï r Ü ¼ Ð K $ 3 K
ô Ç . 7 £ ¤, ω
M C= ω/α s Ù ¼ Ð ξ = ωt = ω
M Ct
M C= ξ
M Cs . # l \ " f ξ
M C H MC í ß r Ð 3 x _ Á º " é ¶ r ç
ß s . Õ ªo # MC í ß r Ð 3 x \ " f % 3 # Qt H l o H
m
M C(ξ
M C) = P
0(ξ
M C− φ
M C), (6)
X <,
m
M C(ξ) = P
0(ξ − φ
M C), (7)
Ð ³ ð & ³½ + É Ã º e . # l " f P
0 É r # Q " Å Òl < ÊÃ ºs 9, φ
M C H Á º " é ¶ l © h cos(ξ
M C) = h cos(ξ) ? /\ " f_ t
) a 0 A © ` ¦ _ p ô Ç . t ) a 0 A © [ þ t É r φ
M C6= φ s Ù
¼ Ð, 0 A_ 2t ~ ½ ÓZ O ` ¦ + " f % 3 É r 6 £ § / B G [ þ t É r é ß í H
y
F » ¡ ¤& h ) a r ç ß αt ë ß ` ¦ s 6 x K " f H ' a s ÷ &t · ú § H
.
Õ
ªX O t ë ß t ) a 0 A ©
∆φ = φ − φ
M C, (8)
\
¦ + " f d (7)` ¦
m
M C(ξ) = P
0(ξ − φ + ∆φ). (9) ü
< ° ú s ³ ð & ³½ + É Ã º e Ü ¼ 9, Õ ªo # s [ þ t 6 £ § / B G ¸
"
f Ð q §½ + É Ã º e > ) a . # l " f t ) a 0 A © ∆φ H
¼
# _ © Tom´eü < de Oliveira ~ ½ Ó& ñ d _ Ã ºu Û ¦ s ü < MC
í ß r Ð 3 x Ü ¼ Ð Â Ò' ½ ¨ô Ç 6 £ §/ B G \ " f l o þ j@ /u
\
" f 0Ü ¼ Ð b # Qt H r ç ß \ y 1 l x à º\ ¦ Y L ô Ç ° ú כ_ s
Ð & ñ _ l Ð ô Ç . Ó ü t : r É r & ñ _ ¸ 0 p x .
V. Tom´ e Ñ ÷ de Oliveira U ê sX N ËÅ k Ä8 ý ¤V þ
s ÚT Ñ ÷ MC ¹ Å mS ó o Þ + s ÇÊ Ý8 ý R w
: r ] X \ " f H Tom´ e ü < de Oliveira ~ ½ Ó& ñ d _ Ã ºu Û ¦ s ü
< MC í ß r Ð 3 x õ \ ¦ q § # s [ þ t s _ ' a > \ ¦
½
©" î l Ð ô Ç . ½ ¨^ & h Ü ¼ Ð H, y 1 l x à º H É r X < ü @ Â
Ò l © _ ; ¤ s ß ¼ l o ª (+)õ 6 £ §(-) s _
Fig. 1. < m(ξ) > vs. h(ξ)/J for the infinite-range Glauber kinetic Ising model at βJ = 0.5 when the dimen- sioless magnetic field amplitude is h
0/J = 1.0 and the angular frequency is ω = 0.001∗2π rad/s. Here, the solid circle, upside-down triangle and square symbols denote the MC simulation results for a lattice size N is equal to 1000, 10000, 100000, respectively. The solid line denotes the numerical solution of Tom´ e and de Oliveira differen- tial equation and the dashed line denotes the fitting of the numerical solution of Tom´ e and de Oliveira to MC results with the delayed phase difference ∆φ = 0.0095 rad
Fig. 2. < m(ξ) > vs. h(ξ)/J for the infinite-range Glauber kinetic Ising model at βJ = 1.0 when the dimen- sioless magnetic field amplitude is h
0/J = 1.0 and the angular frequency is ω = 0.001∗2π rad/s. Here, the solid circle, upside-down triangle and square symbols denote the MC simulation results for a lattice size N is equal to 1000, 10000, 100000, respectively. The solid line denotes the numerical solution of Tom´ e and de Oliveira differen- tial equation and the dashed line denotes the fitting of the numerical solution of Tom´ e and de Oliveira to MC results with the delayed phase difference ∆φ = 0.0251 rad
Fig. 3. < m(ξ) > vs. h(ξ)/J for the infinite-range
Glauber kinetic Ising model at βJ = 2.0 when the dimen-
sioless magnetic field amplitude is h
0/J = 1.0 and the
angular frequency is ω = 0.001∗2π rad/s. Here, the solid
circle, upside-down triangle and square symbols denote
the MC simulation results for a lattice size N is equal to
1000, 10000, 100000, respectively. The solid line denotes
the numerical solution of Tom´ e and de Oliveira differen-
tial equation and the dashed line denotes the fitting of
the numerical solution of Tom´ e and de Oliveira to MC
results with the delayed phase difference ∆φ = 0.0216
rad
5 Å q& h ° ú כ` ¦ | 9 Ã º e > ÷ & H @ /g A 6 £ § (symmetric hysteresis) ë ß ` ¦ ¦ 9 l Ð ô Ç . : r ½ ¨\ " f H À Òl
B Ä º # Q 9î r q @ /g A 6 £ § (asymmetric hysteresis)` ¦ ]
jü @ l Ð ô Ç .
Fig. 1 É r y 1 l x à º ω = 0.001 ∗ 2π rad/s, Á º " é ¶ : r ¸ _
% i à º βJ = 0.5, Á º " é ¶ l © ; ¤ h
0/J = 1.0{ 9 M : Á
ºô Ç# 3 0 A Glauber î r1 l x < Æ& h Ising ¸4 S q_ l 6 £ §/ B G
`
¦ · p . T q ` ð ø Í É r Tom´ e ü < de Oliveira p ì r ~ ½ Ó& ñ d
_ Û ¦ s Ð Â Ò' % 3 É r q ¨ î + þ A l o < m(ξ) >\ ¦ Á º
" é ¶ l © h(ξ)/J\ @ /K " f Õ ª 2 ; / B G ` ¦ ? / ¦, s /
B G ` ¦ t ) a 0 A © ∆φ = 0.0095 rad\ ¦ 2 [K " f Û ¼ 2 ;
>
hà º Ns 1,000\ " f 100,000 t ½ + ÉM :_ MC í ß r Ð
3 x õ \ ´ ú ð r / B G ` ¦ _ þ t Ü ¼ Ð ? /% 3 . Õ ªa Ë >\
"
f Ð H ü < ° ú s : r ¸ Z } ¦ y 1 l x à º Ü ¼ > _
l o H l © _ o\ r ç ß s t H d s \ O s 7 £ ¤ r
ç ß . " f 6 £ § & ³ © s { 9 # Q t · ú § H . Õ ªo
#
Tom´eü < de Oliveira ~ ½ Ó& ñ d _ Ã ºu Û ¦ s ü < MC í ß r
Ð 3 x õ s \ t 0 A © \ O Ü ¼o ¦ l @ /½ + É Ã º e
H X <, Ä ºo _ ∆φ _ Á ºr ½ + É ë ß p u É r ° ú כ` ¦ .
Fig. 2 H y 1 l x à º ω = 0.001 ∗ 2π rad/s, Á º " é ¶ : r ¸ _
% i à º βJ = 1.0, Á º " é ¶ l © ; ¤ h
0/J = 1.0{ 9 M : Á
ºô Ç# 3 0 A Glauber î r1 l x < Æ& h Ising ¸4 S q_ l 6 £ §/ B G
`
¦ · p . T q ` ð ø Í É r Tom´ e ü < de Oliveira p ì r ~ ½ Ó& ñ d
_ Û ¦ s Ð Â Ò' % 3 É r q ¨ î + þ A l o < m(ξ) >\ ¦ Á º
"
é
¶ l © h(ξ)/J\ @ /K " f Õ ª 2 ; 6 £ §/ B G ` ¦ ? / ¦, s
/ B G ` ¦ t ) a 0 A © ∆φ = 0.1172 rad\ ¦ 2 [K " f Û ¼
2 ; > hà º Ns 1,000\ " f 100,000 t ½ + ÉM :_ MC í ß r
Ð 3 x õ \ ´ ú ð r / B G ` ¦ _ þ t Ü ¼ Ð ? /% 3 . Ä ºo _
¸4 S q É r : r ¸ ± ú 4 R" f e > : r ¸\ ¸² ú l
© 5 Å q \ " f l o Ò q t| . Õ ªo # r ç ß \ " f 1
l
x H l © É r ¸4 S q_ l oü < " f Ð â Ô q t > ÷ &Ù ¼
Ð r ç ß / B N ç ß \ " f e © ] X Ð r q 5 p w ô Ç & ³ © ` ¦ { 9 Ü ¼v Ù ¼ Ð 6
£
§ & ³ © s Ò q tl > ) a . " f " f Ð_ r ç ß é ß 0 A
É r Tom´ e ü < de Oliveira ~ ½ Ó& ñ d _ Ã ºu Û ¦ s ü < MC í ß r
Ð 3 x \ H t 0 A © ç ß \ s Ò q tl > ) a . Fig. 2 H
>
í ß ô Ç t 0 A © \ ¦ 6 x # ´ ú Æ Ò# Q Ð s [ þ t 2 t
~
½ ÓZ O Ü ¼ Ð % 3 É r õ " f Ð ¸ ú { 9 u < Ê` ¦ Ð# ï r .
Fig. 3 H y 1 l x à º ω = 0.001 ∗ 2π rad/s, Á º " é ¶ : r ¸ _
% i à º βJ = 2.0, Á º " é ¶ l © ; ¤ h
0/J = 1.0{ 9 M : Á
ºô Ç# 3 0 A Glauber î r1 l x < Æ& h Ising ¸4 S q_ l 6 £ §/ B G
`
¦ · p . T q ` ð ø Í É r Tom´ e ü < de Oliveira p ì r ~ ½ Ó& ñ d _
Û ¦ s Ð Â Ò' % 3 É r q ¨ î + þ A l o < m(ξ) >\ ¦ Á º " é ¶
l © h(ξ)/J\ @ /K " f Õ ª 2 ; 6 £ §/ B G ` ¦ ? / ¦, s /
B G ` ¦ t ) a 0 A © ∆φ = 0.1024 rad\ ¦ 2 [K " f Û ¼ 2 ;
>
hà º Ns 1,000\ " f 100,000 t ½ + ÉM :_ MC í ß r Ð
3 x õ \ ´ ú ð r / B G ` ¦ _ þ t Ü ¼ Ð ? /% 3 . s Õ ªa Ë >
É
r : r ¸ Å Ò ± ú 4 R" f l o & t r ç ß \
"
f 1 l x H l © õ 8¹ ¡ ¤ 8 â Ô q t` ¦ > ÷ &# Q 6 £ § & ³
© s d o H d` ¦ Ð# ï r . s â Ä º\ ¸ > í ß ) a t 0 A
© \ ¦ 6 x # ´ ú Æ Ò# Q Ð s [ þ t 2 t ~ ½ ÓZ O Ü ¼ Ð % 3 É r
õ " f Ð ¸ ú { 9 u < Ê` ¦ Ð# ï r .
VI. + s Ç Â ] Ø
Ä
ºo H : r 7 Hë H \ " f r ç ß \ " f 1 l x H l © 5 Å q
\
" f_ Á ºô Ç# 3 0 A Glauber î r1 l x < Æ& h Ising ¸4 S q\ " f_ @ / g A 6 £ § & ³ © ` ¦ MC í ß r Ð 3 x õ Tom´e ü < de Oliveira_
Û ¼' ~ ½ Ó& ñ d ] X H ~ ½ ÓZ O ` ¦ 6 x # ½ ¨ % i . MC
í ß r Ð 3 x õ Û ¼' ~ ½ Ó& ñ d _ r ç ß é ß 0 A " f Ð Ø ÔÙ ¼
Ð l 6 £ §/ B G s " f Ð { 9 u t · ú §6 £ §` ¦ µ 1 Ï| % i .
Õ
ª X < s [ þ t l 6 £ §/ B G s " f Ð ' aº ÷ & · ú §Ü ¼ , MC
í ß r Ð 3 x _ Ó ü t o & h _ p \ ë H ] j µ 1 ÏÒ q t Ù ¼ Ð s [ þ t / B G
s # Qb G> ' a| ¨ c à º e ` ¦ t \ ¦ ¸ ô Ç õ l oü <
l © s _ t 0 A © s 0 A_ 2t â Ä º\ " f Ð 2
£
§` ¦ · ú > ÷ &% 3 . Õ ªo # t ) a 0 A © ç ß _ s H
>
h¥ Æ ` ¦ ¸{ 9 % i ¦, s כ ` ¦ s 6 x # MC í ß r Ð 3 x \ " f
% 3
É r 6 £ § / B G õ Tom´e ü < de Oliveira_ Û ¼' ~ ½ Ó& ñ d ] X
H ~ ½ ÓZ O ` ¦ + " f % 3 É r 6 £ § / B G ` ¦ ' a t Ä º H X < $ í / B N
% i Ü ¼ 9, MC í ß r Ð 3 x s z ´] jü < ' a s H d` ¦ Ð% i .
Õ
ªo # Ä ºo H : r ½ ¨ · ú ¡Ü ¼ Ð { 9 ì ø Í& h 6 £ § & ³ © _
½ ¨\ í$ 3 s | ¨ c à º e ` ¦ כ s ¦ l @ /ô Ç .
P
c p 8 ý ò k >
s
7 Hë H É r 2006 < Ƹ ¸ Ø æ· ¡ ¤ @ / < Æ § l $ í r ½ ¨q t
"
é
¶ \ _ # ½ ¨÷ &% 3 _ þ v m .
Y
c p w à U Ø ô
[1] G. Bertotti, Hysteresis in Magnetism (Academic Press, London, 1998).
[2] E. Della Torre, Magnetic Hysteresis (IEEE Press, New York, 1999).
[3] I. D. Mayergoyz, Mathematical Models of Hysteresis
(Springer, New York, 1991).
[4] B. K. Chakrabarti and M. Acharyya, Rev. Mod.
Phys. 71, 847 (1999); M. Acharyya and B. K.
Chakrabarti, in Annual Reviews of Computational Physics I, edited by D. Stauffer (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994).
[5] I. Oppenheim, K. E. Shuler and G. H. Weiss, Stochastic Processes in Chemical Physics: The Mas- ter Equation (The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1977).
[6] T. Tom´ eand M. J de Oliveira, Phys. Rev. A 41, 4251 (1990).
[7] Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics, edited by K. Binder (Springer, Berlin, 1986); Monte Carlo Methods in Condensed Matter Physics, edited by K.
Binder (Springer, Berlin, 1992); A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulations in Statistical Physics, edited by D. P Landau and K. Binder (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
[8] S. K. Oh and H. J. Kang, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 47, 6 (2005); S. K. Oh, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 48, 18 (2006).
[9] R. J. Glauber, J. Math. Phys. 4, 294 (1963).
[10] Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics in One Di- mension, edited by V. Privman (Cambridge Univer- sity Press, Cambridge, 1997).
[11] M. Suzuki and R. Kubo, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 24, 51 (1968); H. E. Stanley, Introduction to Phase Tran- sitions and Critical Phenomena (Oxford University Press, New York, 1971). See Appendix E.
[12] C. J. Thompson, Mathematical Statistical Mechan- ics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1972), p.
98.
Hysteresis in the Infinite-Range Glauber Kinetic Ising Model in a Time-Dependent Oscillating Field: Monte Carlo Simulations vs. the
Master Equation Approach
Suhk Kun Oh
∗Basic Science Research Institute and Department of Physics, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 361-763
(Received 15 September 2006)
Hysteresis curves obtained from both Monte Carlo simulations and from the master equation approach via the Tom´ e and de Oliveira equation for the infinite-range Glauber kinetic Ising model in the presence of time-dependent external oscillating magnetic fields are compared. We found that these hysteresis curves cannot be related by simply introducing the re-scaled time. The differ- ence between lagging phases for the hysteresis curves turns out to be another piece of information necessary to relate the hysteresis obtained in the two ways curves.
PACS numbers: 05.10.Ln, 05.50.+q, 05.70.Jk
Keywords: Monts Carlo Simulation, Glauber kinetics, Hysteresis
∗