• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Development of Korean Life Cycle Cost Analysis Model for Road Pavement Asset Management

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Development of Korean Life Cycle Cost Analysis Model for Road Pavement Asset Management"

Copied!
12
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

Received December 18 2012, Revised March 12 2013, Accepted June 4 2013

Copyright ⵑ 2013 by the Korean Society of Civil Engineers

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0)

 ǣŠ––’ǣȀȀ†šǤ†‘‹Ǥ‘”‰ȀͳͲǤͳʹ͸ͷʹȀ•…‡ǤʹͲͳ͵Ǥ͵͵ǤͶǤͳ͸͵ͻ

™™™Ǥ•…‡Œ‘—”ƒŽǤ‘”Ǥ”

ᦂḚ㦪ⵣⵎ♮ኾὪἺ#Ⳃ㬚#㬚ጫ㯓#⚛⬞⺺Ꮾ␂Ⱨ#⁦㯓#ᇚ⇚

෉۩জ ȵܑࡣਐ

Daeseok HAN*, Myungsik DO**

Development of Korean Life Cycle Cost Analysis Model for Road Pavement Asset Management

ABSTRACT

Road pavement management is an important activity that affects to national economy, movement and safety of people, and also demands huge amount of budget. Therefore, its management strategy must be established under objective information. In addition, decision support system that produces the management strategy needs to consider practical benefits from various aspects. Considering these aspects, this paper aimed to develop a customized Korean life cycle cost analysis model estimating various effects on road users and socio-environmental costs based on pavement condition. The suggested LCCA model focused on Korean national highway, and tried to adopt a national guideline recommended by Korean government for securing credibility of estimation results. In the development processes, some of the suggestions that do not fit well in the situations of pavement management field were added, altered, or partially modified. These attempts to develop customized asset management system would be an important step to break away from passive attitudes relying on ready-made software, but also to improve awareness about the social benefits from the better maintenance strategy.

Key words : Road asset management, Life cycle cost, Road users cost, Korean national highway

Ⅹಾ

ࠥಽšญ۵ࠥಽ᮹Õᖅŝ࠺᜽ᨱၹᩢǍᱢᮝಽḡᗮ⦹ᩍ᧝⦹۵⧪᭥ಽ៉, สݡ⦽ᩩᔑᯕᗭ᫵ࢉᮡྜྷುǎaĞᱽၰǎၝ᮹ᯕ࠺ŝᦩᱥᨱ

ᩢ⨆ᮥၙ⊹۵ᵲ᫵⦽᫵ᗭᯕ݅. ᯕ᪡šಉࡽᱥఖᮡݚᩑ⯩~šᱢᯙᱶᅕ⦹ᨱᙹพࡹᨕ᧝⦹໑, əෝघၼ⋉⦹۵᮹ᔍđᱶ᜽ᜅ▽ᮡࠥಽ⚍

ᯱ⬉ŝᨱݡ⦽ᔍ⫭ᱢ⠙ᯖᮥᅕ݅⩥ᝅᱢᯕŁ݅᧲⦽⊂໕ᨱᕽŁಅ⦹ᩍ}ၽࢁ⦥᫵aᯩ݅. ᯕᨱᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵šญᯱእᬊᮡྜྷುࠥಽ⡍ᰆ ᔢ┽ෝ⧉ᙹಽ⦹ᩍࠥಽᯕᬊᯱၰᔍ⫭⪹Ğእᬊᮥᩩ⊂⧁ᙹᯩ۵⦽ǎ⩶ᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊ༉⩶ᮥ}ၽ⦹Łᯱ⦹ᩡ݅. ᱽ᜽ࡽ༉⩶ᮡᬑญӹ௝ǎ

ࠥᝅᱶᨱ฿⇵ᨕ}ၽࡹᨩᮝ໑, đŝ᮹Ŗᝁಆᮥ⪶ᅕ⦹ʑ᭥⧕ᱶᇡ(ǎ☁Ʊ☖ᇡ)aᱽ᜽⦹۵⚍ᯱ⠪aḡ⋉ᮥa܆⦽ₙ᳑⦹ࡹ⡍ᰆšญᇥ᧝

᮹ᝅᱶᨱ฿ḡᦫÑӹ}ᖁ᮹ᩍḡaᯩ۵ᔍ⧎ॅᨱݡ⧕ᕽ۵⇵a, ݡℕ, ᇡᇥᙹᱶᮥ☖⧕}ၽࡹᨩ݅. ᯕ్⦽ᯱʑ⪵ࡽ᜽ᜅ▽ᮥ}ၽ⦹Łᯱ

⦹۵᜽ࠥ۵əeᔢᬊ⪵ࡽᇥᕾ⥥ಽəఉᨱ᮹᳕⦹޹ᗭɚᱢࠥಽᯱᔑšญෝ┩⦝⧉ᮡྜྷು, ࠥಽšญಽᯙ⦽ᔍ⫭ᱢ⠙ᯖᨱݡ⦽ᯙ᜾}ᖁᨱ

ᵲ᫵⦽ℌÙᮭᯕࢁäᯕ݅.

áᔪᨕ ࠥಽᯱᔑšญ, ᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊ, ࠥಽᯕᬊᯱእᬊ, ⦽ǎǎࠥ

1. ᕽು

1966 ֥de Weillea₉పᬕ⧪እᬊ(Vehicle Operating Cost; VOC)ᨱݡ⦽ᱲɝᮥ᜽ࠥ⦽ᯕ௹, ₉పᮝಽᯙ⧕ၽᔾ⦹۵݅᧲⦽

‹‰Š™ƒ›‰‹‡‡”‹‰ ʪͿėॡ

(2)

ᩢ⨆ॅᮥĥప⪵⦹Łᯱ⦹۵יಆᮡ⩥ᰍʭḡࠥЙᵡ⯩ᯕᨕḡŁ

ᯩ݅(de Weille, 1966; AASHTO, 1978; Bennett, 1989; MLTM, 2011; Chatti et al., 2012). ᯕ్⦽ᩑǍॅݡᇡᇥᮡࠥಽ⪶∊ᯕӹ

ᬑ⫭ࠥಽᝁᖅ, ITS(Intelligent Transport Systems)᮹❭ɪ⬉ŝ

॒Ʊ☖šಉ⚍ᯱᔍᨦ᮹┡ݚᖒᮥᇥᕾ⦹۵ߑⅩᱱᮥࢱŁḥ⧪ࡹ

ᨕ᪵ᮝӹ, ↽ɝᨱ۵ࠥಽšญᱥఖᨱݡ⦽⠪aᨱࠥᵝ᫵⦽⧎༊ᮝ ಽ ᩍĉḡŁ ᯩ݅(FHWA, 1998; Bennett et al., 2000; Han, 2011; Han et al., 2007). ࠥಽᯱᔑšญᇥ᧝ᨱᕽ᮹Ğᱽᖒ⠪aa

Ʊ☖ĥ⫮ᇥ᧝᪡݅ෙᱱᮡᔩಽᬕᔍ⫭eᱲᯱᅙ᜽ᖅ᮹Õᖅᯕᦥ ܭᯕၙÕᖅࡽ᜽ᖅྜྷᨱݡ⦽ᮁḡᅕᙹᱥఖᮥݡᔢᮝಽ⦽݅۵

ᱱŝᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊᯕ⡍ᰆᔢ┽ෝ⧉ᙹಽ⦹ᩍࠥ⇽ࡹᨕ᧝⦽݅۵

ᱱᯕ݅. ə్ӹǎaašญ⦹۵ݡȽ༉ᔍ⫭eᱲᯱᅙ᜽ᖅᮥݡᔢ ᮝಽ⦽݅۵ᱱŝᮁḡšญ⧪᭥ಽᯙ⦽ᔍ⫭ᱢ⠙ᯖᨱݡ⦽ᯙ᜾

ᇡ᳒, əญŁᩑǍၰᯱഭᙹḲᨱสݡ⦽᜽eŝᯱᅙᯕ⦥᫵⦹݅۵

ᱱॅᮡࠥಽᯱᔑšญᇥ᧝ᨱݡ⦽⪽ၽ⦽ᩑǍෝႊ⧕⧕᪵݅. ə౑

ᯕᮁಽฯᮡӹ௝ᨱᕽᮁḡᅕᙹእᬊᨱอšᝍᮥࢱ۵šญᯱḡ⨆

⩶⡍ᰆšญ᜽ᜅ▽ᮥᬕᩢ⦹Łᯩ݅. ə్ӹ↽ɝᨱթḡၰ⪹Ğ (ḡǍ᪉ӽ⪵), ᯙe᮹᜽ea⊹᪡ᦩᱥᨱݡ⦽šᝍᯕ׳ᦥḡ໕ᕽ

ᖙĥᮡ⧪(World Bank)ᯕӹ TRB(Transportation Research Board), ၙᩑႊࠥಽǎ(FHWA; Federal Highway Association)॒

ᖁḥǎ᮹Ʊ☖šಉᩑǍʑšᯕӹǎᱽʑǍ॒ᮥᵲᝍᮝಽࠥಽᮁ

ḡšญᱥఖᨱ঑ෙࠥಽᯕᬊᯱၰᔍ⫭⪹Ğእᬊᄡ⪵ᨱݡ⦽ᱲɝ ᯕ᜽ࠥࡹŁᯩ݅(PIARC, 2000; Chatti et al., 2012; FHWA, 1998). ᯕ్⦽ ᯕᬊᯱ ḡ⨆⩶ ᯱᔑšญ༉⩶ᮡ ࠥಽ ᯕᬊᯱ ၰ

ᔍ⫭⪹Ğእᬊᨱݡ⦽ĥప⪵ෝ☖⧕ࠥಽšญ᮹ᵲ᫵ᖒᮥݡᵲᨱ

ᯙ᜾᜽┕ᮡྜྷುᔍ⫭ᱢᗱᝅᮥ↽ᗭ⪵⦹Ł⦽ᱶࡽᩩᔑ᮹እᬊ-⬉

ᮉᖒᮥ᷾ḥ⦹۵ߑᨱࠥ⧖ᝍᱢࠥǍಽ⪽ᬊࢁᙹᯩ݅. ə్ӹ

ʑ᳕ᨱ}ၽࡽᇥᕾ༉⩶ॅᮡᅕ☖əȽ༉aๅᬑⓍŁᅖᰂ⦹໑,

᫵Ǎ⦹۵ᯱഭ᪡ᱶᅕaŝ݅⦹ᩍ⪽ᬊᯕᛞḡᦫ݅. ੱ⦽, ᖙᇡ༉⩶

ᯕ✚ᱶǎa᮹ᯕḩᱢᯙ ⪹Ğ⦹ᨱᕽ᨜ᨕḥᯱഭॅᮥʑၹᮝಽ

}ၽࡹ۵Ğᬑaฯᦥ༉⩶᮹ᯕᱥᖒᨱࠥฯᮡྙᱽaᯩ݅. ᷪ, ᯕၙ}ၽ⧕״ᮡ༉⩶᮹⪽ᬊ᳑₉ᛞḡᦫŁ, ࠥ⇽ࡽđŝ᮹ᝁ഑ࠥ

ࠥ᮹ᝍၼᮥᙹၷᨱᨧ݅. ᯕ౨íࡹ໕, ࠥಽšญᯱ᮹ᱶᅕᙹ᫵᪡

᜽ᜅ▽ᬕᩢ܆ಆᨱᇡ⧊⦹۵ᯱʑ⪵(customized) ࡽ᜽ᜅ▽ᮥḢ ᱲ}ၽ⧕᧝⦽݅۵đುᨱࠥݍ⦽݅. ə్ӹᯕ్⦽ᯱʑ⪵ࡽ

᜽ᜅ▽᮹}ၽࠥᇥᕾ⧎༊ၰᇥᕾʑჶ᮹݅᧲ᖒ, Ųჵ᭥⦽ᩑšᇥ

᧝, ᱶᖒᱢ᫵ᗭ, ᱥఖᱢᮝಽ٥ᱢࡹᨕᦫᮡᯱഭ, ʑၹᩑǍ᮹ᇡᰍ

॒ᮝಽ ᛞí ᜽ࠥࡹʑ ᨕಅᬕ ᝅᱶᯕ݅.

⦽⠙, ǎ☁⧕᧲ᇡ۵Ʊ☖᜽ᖅ⚍ᯱᨱݡ⦽ᔍᱥ-ᔍ⬥┡ݚᖒ⠪a ᨱ⪽ᬊ⧁ᙹᯩࠥಾ“Ʊ☖᜽ᖅ⚍ᯱ⠪aḡ⋉(ᯕ⦹“ǎ☁⧕᧲ᇡ

ḡ⋉ᕽ”)ᮥ}ၽ⦹ᩍbᇥ᧝ᄥಽ݅᧲⦽Ğᱽᖒ⠪a⧎༊ŝእᬊ ᔑᱶႊᦩᮥᱽ᜽⦹Łᯩ݅(MLTM, 2011). ə్ӹᯕḡ⋉ᕽ۵

Ʊ☖ᇥ᧝᮹šᱱᨱᕽ}ၽࡹᨩʑভྙᨱࠥಽᯱᔑšญᨱᇡ⧊⦹۵

ḡ⋉ᮥᱽ᜽⦹Łᯩḡ۵ᦫ݅. ᯕᨱᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ḡ⋉ᕽ᮹እᬊ⠪

aႊᦩᵲᯝᇡෝࠥಽᯱᔑšญ}ֱᨱᱲ༊⧕⦽ǎ⩶ᔾᧁᵝʑእ ᬊᇥᕾ༉⩶}ၽᨱ⪽ᬊ⦹Łᯱ⦹ᩡ݅. ᇥᕾ༉⩶ᮡ⦽ǎǎࠥ᮹

ᝅᱶ(ᯱഭ⪶ᅕᔢ⫊, ᮁḡᅕᙹ⩥⫊॒)ᮥ↽ݡ⦽Łಅ⧉ᮡྜྷು,

ࠥಽšญᯱaᛞíᯕ⧕ၰ⪽ᬊ⧁ᙹᯩࠥಾ༉⩶᮹ᯝၹ⪵/eᗭ⪵

ᨱᵝᦩᱱᮥࢱᨩ݅. ੱ⦽, ᩩ⊂đŝ᮹Ŗᝁಆ⪶ᅕෝ᭥⧕a܆⦽

ḡ⋉ᕽ᮹༉⩶ᮥ∊ᝅ⯩Ǎ⩥⦹ࡹ⡍ᰆšญ⩥ᝅᨱᇡ⧊⦹ḡᦫ۵

ᔍ⧎ᨱݡ⧕ᕽ۵ᰍᱶ᮹, ᙹᱶ, ⇵a॒᮹᯲ᨦᮥ☖⧕ᇥᕾ༉⩶᮹

✡ŝ ᖙᇡᔍ⧎ᮥ đᱶ⦹ᩡ݅.

ᅙםྙᨱᕽᱽ᜽⦹۵ᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊᇥᕾ༉⩶ᮡᵲᰆʑ⠪a༉

⩶ᵲ⦹ӹಽ, ᮁḡᅕᙹᱥఖᨱ঑ෙօ✙ᬭⓍᙹᵡᨱᕽ᮹Ŗᬊᖒŝ

Ğᱽᖒᮥ⠪a⧁ᙹᯩࠥಾ༉⩶⪵ࡹᨩ݅. ᯕ۵ࠥಽᯱᔑšญෝ

᭥⦽ᇥᕾ༉⩶ᵲaᰆᯝၹᱢᯙ⩶┽ಽ⨆⬥ᅕ݅Ǎℕᱢᯕ໕ᕽࠥ

฿∅⩶ᱶᅕෝࠥ⇽⦹ʑ᭥⦽ᯱʑ⪵᜽ᜅ▽}ၽᨱᵲ᫵⦽ʑၹᩑ Ǎಽ⪽ᬊࢁᙹᯩᮥäᯕ݅. ӹᦥa, ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽᱽ᜽⦹۵ᯱᔑš ญ}ֱᨱ᯦b⦽ᇥᕾŝᱶᮡࠥಽ⡍ᰆ᫙ᨱࠥ❭ᗱၰᮁḡᅕᙹŝ ᱶᮥၹᅖ⦹۵݅ෙᔍ⫭eᱲᯱᅙ᜽ᖅᨱࠥₙ᳑a܆⦽ᔍ⧎ᯕအ ಽə⪽ᬊᖒᯕ׳݅Ł⦹ā݅. ⦽⠙, ᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊᇥᕾᮥ᭥⧕

}ၽࡽ݅᧲⦽ᖙᇡ༉⩶ŝ᮹ᔍđᱶŝᱶᮥ⦽⠙᮹םྙᨱᕽᝍࠥ

ᯩí݅൉ʑᨱ۵⦽ĥaᯩ݅. ᯕᨱᅙםྙᨱᕽ۵}ၽᱥఖ, ᇥᕾ᮹

✡, əญŁ⪽ᬊᔍಡෝᵲᝍᮝಽʑᚁ⦹ʑಽ⦹໑ᖙᇡ༉⩶ᨱݡ⦽

Ǎℕᱢ ԕᬊᮡ ⨆⬥ םྙᨱᕽ ݅൉ʑಽ ⦽݅.

2. ᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊᇥᕾ༉⩶᮹}ၽႊᦩ

2.1 ࡦ෴Թࢳଭ׆࣭ୢ߃

ᅙםྙᨱᕽ۵ࠥಽ⡍ᰆšญᇥ᧝ෝ᭥⦽ᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊᇥᕾ༉

⩶}ၽ᮹⧖ᝍᮥ1) ĥప⪵⧎༊᮹đᱶ, 2) ⡍ᰆšญෝ༊ᱢᮝಽ

⦹۵(ᷪ, ⡍ᰆᔢ┽ෝ⧉ᙹಽ⦹۵) ᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊ༉⩶᮹✡ᱽ᜽, 3) ᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊၰᖙᇡ༉⩶᮹ᯝၹ⪵᪡eᗭ⪵ෝ☖⦽⪽ᬊ᮹

ᬊᯕᖒ ⪶ᅕ, 4) ࠥ⇽đŝ᮹ ᝁ഑ᖒ ⪶ᅕಽ ᖅᱶ⦹ᩡ݅.

ຝᱡĥప⪵⧁⧎༊᮹ᱶ᮹۵ࠥಽᮁḡᅕᙹಽᯙ⧕⠙ᯖᯕၽᔾ

⦹۵⧎༊ᮥᱶ᮹⦹۵äᯕ݅. ྜྷು, a܆⦽ฯᮡ⧎༊ᮥ⡍⧉⦹۵

äᯕࠥಽ⚍ᯱ⬉ŝෝᖅ໦⦹۵ߑᮁᯖ⦹ӹ༉⩶}ၽᯕӹ⪽ᬊᨱ

ᨕಅᬡᯕ঑෕ʑভྙᨱᱶᅕᙹ᫵᪡ᯱഭ᮹⦽ĥෝŁಅ⦹ᩍᱶ᮹

ࢁ⦥᫵aᯩ݅. ੱ⦽, b⧎༊᮹ᵲ᫵ࠥa݅෕အಽ}ၽ᮹ᬑᖁᙽ

᭥ෝ ᱶ⧕ࢱ۵ äᯕ ၵ௭Ḣ⦹໑, ᯱഭӹ ᱶᅕ᮹ ⦽ĥಽ }ၽᯕ

ᩍ᮹⊹༜⦽ Ğᬑ ᵲ᫵ࠥᨱ঑௝ ⧖ᝍ ᇡᇥᇡ░}ၽ⦹ࡹ ⨆⬥

ḡᗮᱢᮝಽ }ᖁ⧕ ӹa۵ ᱥఖᯕ ⦥᫵⦹݅.

ࢱჩṙಽ⡍ᰆᔢ┽ෝ⧉ᙹಽ⦹۵ᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊ༉⩶}ၽᮡ

ᅙםྙ᮹aᰆ⧖ᝍᱢᔍ⧎ᯕ݅. อ᧞ᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊᯕƱ☖ĥ⫮ᇥ

(3)

Table 1. A development plan considering the “A Guidebook for Investment of Transportation Facilities (MLTM, 2011)”

Cost contents and sub-models

Korean guidebook (MLTM, 2011)

Korean life cycle cost analysis model (this study) Modeling plans Typical results Agency costs Maintenance

(1)*

maintenance type/year/section (Discounted and undiscounted)

definition Construction

and residual cost (3) Road user

costs

Vehicle operating costs

(2)

vehicle depreciation

vehicle type

required

travel time cost, and vehicle emission cost by a vehicle type/section/year

by a fatality/section/

year Travel time

cost (1)

by a vehicle type

analysis

excluded

required Traffic accident

costs (3)

condition-based accident cost estimation model is required

Socio-enviro nmental cost

Emission costs (1)

HC, PM, NOx)

compound type

definition

Sub-models Deterioration forecasting

model (1)

speeds for applying Markov process

life expectancy by a rating

Vehicle speed

model (2)

estimation model

operating speed by a vehicle

type/section/year Future traffic

volume generation (2)

Selectable from:

Monte-Carlo method

by a vehicle type (differed by model choice)

Traffic accidents (3)

accidents by a section/year Economic

decision indices (2)

Rate of Return (IRR)

Annual Cost)

applied alternatives Note: *Priority orders are in the parenthesis

᧝⃹ౝ ⅾ ᵝ⧪Ñญӹ ᗮࠥ᮹ ⧉ᙹಽอ ᩩ⊂ࡽ݅໕, ݡᦩ e᮹

እᬊ₉ᯕ۵šญᯱእᬊᨱᕽอၽᔾ⦹íࡹ໑, ᩩ⊂ࡽࠥಽᯕᬊᯱ

ၰᔍ⫭⪹Ğእᬊᮡ݉ᙽ⦽ᱶᅕᨱᇩŝ⧁ᐱĞᰢᱢݡᦩ᮹ᬑᖁᙽ

᭥ đᱶᨱ ⪽ᬊࢁ ᙹ ᨧ݅.

݅ᮭᮝಽᖙᇡᇥᕾ༉⩶ၰ⦥᫵ᯱഭ᮹ᯝၹ⪵, eᗭ⪵a᫵Ǎࡽ

݅. ᯕ۵⩥ᰍᔢᬊ⪵ࡽ⥥ಽəఉॅ᮹⪽ᬊ݉ĥᨱᕽӹ┡ӽaᰆ

ⓑྙᱽᱱᯕ௝Ł⧁ᙹᯩ݅. ᔍᝅᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊᇥᕾᨱᕽ݅൉Łᯱ

⦹۵⧎༊ᯕӹᯕෝघၼ⋉⦹۵ᖙᇡ༉⩶ॅᮡݡᇡᇥŁᮁ⦽ᩑǍᩢ

(4)

Table 2. Comparison of the Korean LCCA model with existing LCCA models

Contents K-LCCA

(This study)

HDM-4 (current model in use) (PIARC, 2000)

RealCOST (FHWA, 1998)

PMAS (Kobayashi et al., 2008)

Developer Korea World Bank FHWA(U.S.) Japan

Analysis framework Fiscal year Fiscal year Years only when

maintenance conducted Fiscal year

Deterioration forecasting

function

Model type

Multiple deterioration speeds extracted from statistical/

stochastic model

Annual deterioration by Dynamic mechanistic/

empirical model

Expert system (By direct input of life expectancy by users)

Simplified regression for annual deterioration in MCI (Maintenance Control Index) Model

estimation

By inspection data from Korean national highway in 2007~2010

By finding calibration factors included in the basic estimation function

By relying on field experience, or preparatory analysis

By using field data based on Japanese condition index

Road users and socio-environmental costs

VOC, travel time cost, traffic accident cost, emission cost by Korean model (MLTM, 2011)

VOC, travel time cost (by using models developed by various countries)

Additional VOC, travel time cost due to work-zones

Additional VOC, travel time cost due to work-zones

Note

Self-definition for maintenance environment only for Korean national highway

Developed for unknown users Too many input variables Calibration/domestication matters

Self-definition for domestic usage in U.S.

Abnormal definition to LCC property

Self-definition for Mie prefecture based on domestic pavement condition index(MCI)

ᩎᮥaḡŁᯩᨕᔢݚ⯩ၙ᜽ᱢᯙᙹᵡʭḡ݅൑อⓝᯕၙฯᯕ

ḥᅕࡹᨕᯩ݅. ʑ᳕༉⩶ᨱᕽᯕ్⦽ᇥᕾ༉⩶ॅᮥəݡಽ᜽ᜅ▽

ᨱ᯦ࠥ⦹íࡹ໕ᕽࠥಽšญᇥ᧝ᨱᕽᯝၹᱢᮝಽᙹḲࡹŁᯩ۵

ᯱഭಽ۵ᱽݡಽ⪽ᬊ⦹ʑᨕಅᬕĞᬑaኩჩ⯩ၽᔾ⦹íࡹᨩ݅.

ᷪ, ᱢᱩ⦽ ᙹᵡᨱᕽ ᯝၹ⪵, eᗭ⪵ෝ ☖⦽ ᖁ⧪}ၽᮥ ᜽ࠥ⦽

⬥, ᯕ⬥ᱶᅕᙹ᫵ᨱ঑௝᧲ᱢ/ḩᱢ}ᖁᮥϡ⦹۵ᱥఖᯕ⦥᫵⦹݅.

ษḡสᮝಽ, ᇥᕾđŝ᮹ᝁ഑ᖒᮡᇥᕾđŝaᱶ₦ᮥđᱶ⦹۵ ߑᮁᬊ⦽ɝÑಽ⪽ᬊࢁᙹᯩᮥḡ, ᱶᅕᙹᵡᮝಽԉíࢁḡෝ

đᱶ⦹۵ᵲ᫵⦽⧎༊ᯕ݅. ᇥᕾđŝ᮹Ŗᝁಆᮡᯱʑ⪵ࡽ༉⩶ᮥ

ᯱℕ}ၽ⦹Ñӹ, ᯕၙ}ၽࡽ༉⩶ᮥǎԕᝅᱶᨱ฿íᅕᱶ⦹۵

ᱩ₉ෝÑⅅᮥভ⪶ᅕ⧁ᙹᯩ݅. ⦽ǎᮡǎ☁⧕᧲ᇡᨱᕽ“Ʊ☖᜽

ᖅ⚍ᯱ⠪aḡ⋉”ᮥ☖⧕ǎaƱ☖᜽ᖅᨱݡ⦽Ğᱽᖒ⠪aḡ⋉ᮥ

ᱽ᜽⦹Łᯩ݅. ྜྷುᯕḡ⋉ᕽ۵ࠥಽᯱᔑšญᨱ⦥᫵⦽ʑᵡŝ

ႊ⨆ᖒᮡ݅൉Łᯩḡᦫḡอ, ǎԕᨱᕽᙹ⧪ࡽᩑǍđŝෝʑၹᮝ ಽ ᯕᬊᯱ ၰ ᔍ⫭⪹Ğእᬊᨱ ݡ⦽ ࠥ⇽ႊᦩᮥ ᱽ᜽⦹Ł ᯩᨕ

ᯕෝ∊ᝅ⯩⪽ᬊ⦹໕ ᇥᕾđŝ᮹Ŗᝁಆᮥ⦽ᱶᱢᮝಽ⪶ᅕ⧁

ᙹᯩ݅Łᩍĉḥ݅. ঑௝ᕽࠥಽᯱᔑšญʑჶ᮹✡ᮥᱽ᜽⦹Ł, Ʊ☖ᇥ᧝ᨱ฿⇵ᨕᱽ᜽ࡽᖙᇡʑᵡŝእᬊᔑᱶ༉⩶ᮥࠥಽ⡍ᰆš ญᇥ᧝᮹✚ᖒᨱ฿íᙹᱶၰᅕ᪥⦹۵᯲ᨦᮡᅙםྙ᮹⧖ᝍᯕ௝

⧁ ᙹ ᯩ݅.

2.2 ঍઀ச׆ण૳ාࡧ୨ଭࢫࡦ෴ฃ

ǎ☁⧕᧲ᇡḡ⋉ᕽaᱽ᜽⦹Łᯩ۵ࠥಽᇡྙ᮹Ğᱽᖒ⠪a⧎

༊ᮥ ᔕ⠕ᅕ໕, ⚍ᯱ⠙ᯖᮥ Ḣᱲ⠙ᯖŝ eᱲ⠙ᯖᮝಽ Ǎᇥ⦹Ł

ᯩŁ, ᯕ ᵲᨱᕽ Ḣᱲ⠙ᯖอᮥ ĥప⪵ ݡᔢᮝಽ ᱶ᮹⦹Ł ᯩ݅

(MLTM, 2011). Table 1ᮡƱ☖᜽ᖅ⚍ᯱḡ⋉᮹šಉԕᬊᮥࠥಽ

ᯱᔑšญ᮹ šᱱᨱᕽ Łₑ⦽ ༉⩶⪵ ĥ⫮ᮥ ᱽ᜽⦹Ł ᯩ݅.

ḡ⋉ᕽᨱᕽḡᱶ⦹Łᯩ۵ࠥಽᯕᬊᯱၰᔍ⫭⪹Ğእᬊᨱݡ⦽

⧎༊ᮡ⡍ᰆšญᇥ᧝᮹ݡ⢽ᱢ༉⩶ᵲ⦹ӹᯙHDM-4(Bennett et al., 2000)ӹ↽ɝၙǎᨱᕽᙹ⧪ࡽNHCRP Report 720(Chatti et al., 2012), ʑ┡⦽ǎᮥݡᔢᮝಽᙹ⧪ࡽၵᯩ۵ᖁ⧪ᩑǍ(Do et al., 2006, 2007; Han et al., 2007)ᨱᕽ Łಅ⧩޹ ⧎༊ॅŝ

Ñ᮹ ᯝ⊹⦹Ł ᯩᮭᮥ ᦭ ᙹ ᯩ݅.

⦽⠙, ᅙםྙᨱᨙɪࡹŁᯩ۵“⦽ǎ⩶”᮹}ֱᮡ“⦽ǎᝅᱶᨱ

ᱢ⧊⦽”ŝzᮡ᮹ၙᯕ݅. ᷪ, ⦽ǎ᮹ࠥಽšญᝅᱶŝ⠪aʑᵡ, əญŁᇥᕾᨱ⦥᫵⦽ᖙᇡ༉⩶ŝ᯦ಆᱶᅕॅᮥᬑญӹ௝ᨱᕽ᨜

ᨕḥᯱഭॅᮥ☖⧕༉⩶ᮥǍ⇶, ᅕᱶ, ⪽ᬊ⦹۵äᮥ᮹ၙ⦽݅.

ᯕᵲaᰆ⧖ᝍᱢ⧎༊ᮡ1)ࠥಽ❭ᗱᩩ⊂⧉ᙹ᮹ࠥ⇽, 2)ᯕᬊᯱ

ၰᔍ⫭⪹Ğእᬊ༉⩶᮹ǎԕ⪵, 3)ᇥᕾ᪖ᖹ(ᇥᕾʑe, ⧁ᯙᮉ, ₉

᳦Ǎᇥ, b᳦እᬊ᮹ᬱ݉᭥)᮹đᱶᮝಽᯕॅᨱݡ⦽ǎԕ⪵a

ᯕ൉ᨕḡḡ༜⦹໕ᇥᕾࡽđŝ۵ᝁ഑⧁ᙹᨧíࡽ݅. ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ

ᱽ᜽⦹Łᯩ۵⦽ǎ⩶ᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊ༉⩶ᮥ⩥ᰍᖙĥᱢᮝಽ⡎մí

ᇥ⡍ࡹᨕᯩ۵HDM-4 (⩥ᰍ⦽ǎǎࠥᨱࠥ⪽ᬊᵲ), RealCOST, ə᫙ᯝᅙᨱᕽ}ၽࡽPMAS (Pavement Management Accounting System)(Kobayashi et al., 2008) ॒ŝ e݉⯩ እƱ⦹໕ Table 2᪡ z݅.

Table 1 ᨱ ᗭ}ࡽ ԕᬊ ᫙ᨱࠥ MicroBENCOST, RoSy

SYSTEMs, MicroPAVER॒݅᧲⦽༉⩶ॅᯕ᳕ᰍ⦽݅. ᯕॅᮡ

(5)

WĂǀĞŵĞŶƚŝŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJĚĂƚĂ

;'ĞŽŵĞƚƌLJĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶ͕WĂǀĞŵĞŶƚ

ĚĞƐŝŐŶ͕DĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞŚŝƐƚŽƌLJ͕

^ƵƌĨĂĐĞĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶ͕dƌĂĨĨŝĐ

ǀŽůƵŵĞĞƚĐ͘Ϳ

ĞƚĞƌŝŽƌĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌĞĐĂƐƚŝŶŐŵŽĚĞů

;ĂƐĞĚŽŶDĂƌŬŽǀWƌŽĐĞƐƐͿ

ƐƚŝŵĂƚŝŽŶŽĨǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐƉĞĞĚƐ

;&ƌĞĞƐƉĞĞĚ͕ƚƌĂǀĞůƐƉĞĞĚͿ DĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞĚĞƐŝŐŶͬ

DĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞƚŝŵŝŶŐƐ

ĞƚĞƌŝŽƌĂƚŝŽŶƐƉĞĞĚƐďLJ

ĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶŝŶĚŝĐĞƐĂŶĚƌĂƚŝŶŐƐ

ŐĞŶĐLJĐŽƐƚƐ

;DĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞĐŽƐƚŽŶůLJͿ

ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĐŽƐƚƐ

;ďLJϱƚLJƉĞƐŽĨĐŽŵƉŽƵŶĚĨƌŽŵ

ǀĞŚŝĐůĞĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶͿ

ĐŽŶŽŵŝĐĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ

;EWs͕h͕ͬͿ

ŶĂůLJƐŝƐŽƉƚŝŽŶƐ

;DĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ͕

ĚŝƐĐŽƵŶƚƌĂƚĞ͕ĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐƉĞƌŝŽĚ͕

ƵŶŝƚĐŽƐƚƐĞƚĐ͘Ϳ

>ŽĐĂůŝnjĞĚƌĞŐƌĞƐƐŝŽŶ ;KƉƚŝŽŶͿ

ŶŶƵĂůƉĂǀĞŵĞŶƚĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶďLJ

ŝŶĚĞdžͬLJĞĂƌͬƐĞĐƚŝŽŶ

;/ŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞĞĨĨĞĐƚƐͿ dƌĂĨĨŝĐǀŽůƵŵĞŐĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶ

;ďLJƵŶŝĨŽƌŵ͕^ƚŽĐŚĂƐƚŝĐŵĞƚŚŽĚͿ

ZŽĂĚƵƐĞƌƐĐŽƐƚƐ

;sK͕dƌĂǀĞůƚŝŵĞĐŽƐƚ͕

ĐĐŝĚĞŶƚĐŽƐƚƐͿ

KƵƚůŝĞƌĨŝůƚĞƌŝŶŐ

;ŝŶǀĞƌƐĞĚĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶͿ

WƌĞƉĂƌĂƚŽƌLJǁŽƌŬƐ

ĨŽƌ>

&ĞĞĚďĂĐŬWƌŽĐĞƐƐ

Fig. 1. A flowchart for pavement condition-based life cycle cost analysis model

bbᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊ᮹⧎༊ŝᱶ᮹, ⇵ᱶʑჶᨱᔢݚ⦽₉ᯕෝᅕᯕ

Łᯩᮝ໑, ݚᩑ⯩᯦ಆᯱഭ᪡ᇥᕾđŝྜྷ᮹⧎༊ŝ⩶┽ࠥᔢᯕ⦹

݅. ᯕ౨í݅᧲⦽༉⩶ᯕ᳕ᰍ⧉ᨱࠥ✚ᱶ⦽༉⩶ᨱݡ⦽ᖁ⪙a

ࢱऽ్ḡḡᦫ۵ᯕᮁ۵݉ᙽ⯩}ၽᯱᨱ᮹⧕ᯝႊᱢᮝಽᱶ᮹ࡽ

༉⩶ᮡᇩ✚ᱶ݅ᙹ᮹ ᜽ᜅ▽ᬕᩢ܆ಆŝᱶᅕᙹ᫵ෝ∊᳒᜽┍

ᙹᨧʑভྙᯕ݅. ᷪࠥಽᯱᔑšญ᜽ᜅ▽᮹ḡᗮa܆⦽}ၽᮡ

ᯱʑaᬱ⦹۵༉⩶ᮥḢᱲᱶ᮹/}ၽ⦹Łᱶᅕᙹ᫵/ᬕᬊ܆ಆᨱ

฿⇵ᨕ }ᖁ⧕ ӹa۵ äᯕ௝ ⧁ ᙹ ᯩ݅.

2.3 ंজଭൌ୪ਏ

ࠥಽ⡍ᰆᔢ┽ʑၹᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊᇥᕾᨱ⦥᫵⦽Ǎᖒᮥ᫵᧞⦹໕

1) ⡍ᰆᱶᅕDB(Database) Ǎ⇶ၰᯕᔢ⊹ᱽÑŝᱶ, 2) ᩑࠥᄥ

ࠥಽᔢ┽ᩩ⊂(ᮁḡᅕᙹ⬉ŝ⡍⧉), 3) šญᯱእᬊᩩ⊂, 4) Ʊ☖ప

ᩩ⊂, 5) ₉᳦ᄥ₉పᗮࠥᩩ⊂, 6) ᯕᬊᯱእᬊᩩ⊂, 7) ⪹Ğእᬊ

ᩩ⊂, 8) Ğᱽᖒ⠪aḡ⢽ࠥ⇽, 9) ⦝ऽ႒(feedback)ŝᱶᮝಽ᫵᧞

⧁ᙹᯩ݅. ᯕŝᱶॅᮥᙹ⧪⦹ʑ᭥⦽ᖙᇡ༉⩶ᮝಽ۵ࠥಽ❭ᗱᩩ

⊂༉⩶, šญᯱእᬊ༉⩶, ₉పᬕ⧪ᗮࠥ༉⩶, ₉పᬕ⧪እᬊ༉⩶, ☖

⧪᜽eእᬊ༉⩶, Ʊ☖ᔍŁእᬊ༉⩶, ⪹Ğእᬊ༉⩶, Ʊ☖పၽᔾ༉

⩶, Ğᱽᖒ⠪a༉⩶ᯕ⦥᫵⦹໑, ⦽༉⩶ᨱᕽࠥ⇽ࡽđŝa݅ෙ

༉⩶᮹᯦ಆᯱഭಽ⪽ᬊࡹ۵Ǎ᳑ෝwíࡽ݅. ᇥᕾđŝᨱaᰆ

ⓑ ᩢ⨆ᮥ ၙ⊹۵ ⧖ᝍᄡᙹ۵ ⡍ᰆ᮹ ❭ᗱᗮࠥ, ᮁḡᅕᙹʑᵡ, Ʊ☖ప, ₉పᬕ⧪ᗮࠥ, b᳦ᬱ݉᭥aᯩ݅. b༉⩶ᮥ☖⧕ᱥ⩶ᱢ ᮝಽ ᨜ᨕḩ ᙹ ᯩ۵ đŝྜྷॅᮡ Table 1ᨱ eఖ⯩ ᫵᧞ࡽ ၵ

ᯩᮝ໑, ᯕॅ᮹᮲ᬊၰ᳑⧊ᮥ☖⧕ᅕ݅݅᧲⦽ᱶᅕࠥ⇽ࠥa܆⦹

݅. ᅙםྙᨱᕽᱽ᜽⦹۵ᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊᇥᕾ᮹⮱෥ࠥ۵Fig. 1ŝ

z݅.

3. ⦽ǎ⩶ᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊᇥᕾ༉⩶᮹}ၽ

ᇥᕾ༉⩶᮹ᱶ᮹۵⚍ᯱḡ⋉ᨱᕽᱽ᜽⦹Łᯩ۵ԕᬊᮥ↽ݡ⦽

⪽ᬊ⦹۵äᮥᬱ⊺ᮝಽ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ᅙᱩᨱᕽ۵⦽ǎ⩶ᔾᧁᵝʑእ ᬊ༉⩶᮹ᱶ᮹᪡šಉࡽ⧖ᝍᔍ⧎ᨱݡ⧕ᕽอeఖ⯩ᕽᚁ⦹ʑಽ

⦽݅.

3.1 ւࠤୀण૳

⡍ᰆšญᇥ᧝ᨱᕽšญᯱእᬊᮡᮁḡᅕᙹእᬊ(ᄡ࠺እ)ᮝಽ⦽

ᱶࡹ۵äᯕᯝၹᱢᯕ݅. ᬑญӹ௝ǎࠥ۵⫭ĥᩑࠥෝʑᵡᮝಽ

ๅ֥᳑ᔍࡹ۵⡍ᰆᔢ┽ḡ⢽ෝₙ᳑⦹ᩍᮁḡᅕᙹ ᜽⧪ᩍᇡෝ

đᱶ⦹Łᯩ۵ᱱᮥŁಅ⦹໕“ᩑࠥ/Ǎe/ᔢ┽ḡ⢽ᄥ”ಽ⡍ᰆᔢ┽

ෝᩩ⊂⦹۵đᱶುᱢ༉⩶ᯕᅕ݅ᬑญӹ௝⩥ᝅᨱᇡ⧊⦽݅Ł

(6)

ᅝ ᙹ ᯩ݅. ə్ӹ ⡍ᰆ❭ᗱŝᱶ᮹ ᇩ⪶ᝅᖒ ভྙᨱ đᱶುᱢ

༉⩶ᅕ݅۵⪶ශುᱢ༉⩶ᯕ޵ฯᯕ⪽ᬊࡹ໑, əᵲᨱᕽࠥษ෕⎵

⥥ᱥᯕ⪶ශ༉⩶(Markov transition probability model)ᯕaᰆ

ձญ⪽ᬊࡹŁᯩ݅(Kobayashi et al., 2010, 2012; Han et al., 2012c; Yang et al ., 2005; Tsuda et al., 2006). ษ෕⎵⥥ᱥᯕ⪶ශ

༉⩶ᮡᇥᕾaaᱶ᮹⦽ᯕᔑᱢ(discrete) ⡍ᰆᔢ┽ᄥಽʑݡᙹ໦

ᮥࠥ⇽⦹Ł, ᯕॅᮥ᳑⧊⦹ᩍ⡍ᰆ❭ᗱᗮࠥ᮹ᄡ⪵ŝᱶᮥ(łᖁᮝ ಽ) ⠪a⦽݅. ᩍʑᕽࠥ⇽ࡽʑݡᙹ໦ॅᮥ݉᭥᜽eݚ❭ᗱపᮝಽ

ᄡ⪹᜽⍽ᇥᕾᨱ⪽ᬊ⦹໕⪶ශ༉⩶ᨱᕽࠥ⇽ࡽ❭ᗱ✚ᖒᮥəݡ ಽᩑࠥʑᵡ❭ᗱŝᱶᩩ⊂ᨱࠥ⪽ᬊ⧁ᙹᯩíࡽ݅. ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵

ษ෕⎵⥥ŝᱶᮥʑᵡᮝಽ ⦽❭ᗱŝᱶᨱᮁḡᅕᙹ᜽⧪ᨱ঑ෙ

ᔢ┽⫭ᅖŝᱶᮥ ⡍⧉⦹ᩍ ❭ᗱŝᱶᮥ ᱶ᜾⪵⦹ᩡ݅.

3.2 ܑߦଲ૳ୀण૳

ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ᮹ࠥಽᯕᬊᯱእᬊᮡ₉పᬕ⧪እᬊ, ☖⧪᜽eእᬊ, ᨵḥ᪅ᯝእᬊ, ₉పᙹญእᬊ, ₉పqaᔢbእᬊᮝಽᱶ᮹ࡹ໑, ⧕ ݚ ࠥಽෝᇥᕾʑe ԕ ᯕᬊ⦹۵༉ु ₉పᮥ ݡᔢᮝಽ⠙ᯖᮥ

⇵ᱶ⦽݅. ⦽⠙, ࠥಽ⡍ᰆᔢ┽a₉ప☖⧪ᗮࠥᨱᩢ⨆ᮥၙ⊽݅۵

ᩑǍᖒŝ(Hide et al., 1975; Morosiuk et al., 1982; Watanatada, 1981)ᨱ᮹Ñ, ₉పᬕ⧪ᗮࠥᩩ⊂ᨱ⡍ᰆᔢ┽ෝๅ}ᄡᙹಽ⪽ᬊ

ࡹ۵ Ǎ᳑ෝ ☖⧕ ࠥಽᯕᬊᯱእᬊᨱ ᱲɝ⦹Łᯱ ⦹ᩡ݅(Fig. 1 ₙ᳑).

3.2.1 ఙ߆૶ෘण૳

ຝᱡ, ₉పᬕ⧪እᬊŝšಉࡽᖁ⧪ᩑǍෝᔕ⠕ᅕ໕ݡᇡᇥ1)

ᮁඹ, 2) ᨵḥ᪅ᯝ, 3) ┡ᯕᨕ, 4) ₉పᮁḡᅕᙹ, 5) ₉పqaᔢbᮥ

ݡᔢᮝಽ ⦹Ł ᯩᮝ໑(de Weille, 1966; Bonny et al., 1967;

AASHTO, 1978; Goodman et al., 2006; Uddin et al., 1998;

Han, 2011; Chatti et al., 2012), ǎ☁⧕᧲ᇡḡ⋉ᕽࠥᯕ᪡࠺ᯝ⦽

ᱶ᮹ෝԕญŁᯩ݅. ḡ⋉ᕽᨱᕽ᮹₉పᬕ⧪እᬊᩩ⊂༉⩶ᮡ₉ప ᬕ⧪ᗮࠥอᮥᄡᙹಽ⪽ᬊ⦹۵Ǎ᳑ෝ≉⦹Łᯩᮝ໑, ₉᳦ᮥʑᅙ

ᩩ⊂݉᭥ಽ⦹Łᯩ݅. ੱ⦽, ᩩ⊂᜾ᨧᯕๅ10km/h ᄥ₉పᬕ⧪እ ᬊ᮹ᬱ݉᭥ෝᱽ᜽⦹Ł, ᵲeᗮࠥ۵3₉⫭ȡ᜾ᮥᯕᬊ⦹ᩍᔑ⇽

⧁äᮥᱽ᜽⦹Łᯩ݅. ə్ӹᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ3₉᜾᮹ᱢ⧊ᖒᮥ

ᔕ⠕ᅙđŝᯝᇡᩩ⊂⧉ᙹॅ᮹ᱢ⧊ࠥR

2

a0.9 ᯕ⦹ಽӹ┡ӹ۵

Ğᬑa ၽᔾ⦹ᩍ 4₉ ᜾ᮝಽ ⪶ᰆ᜽⍽ ᱢᬊ⦹ᩡ݅.

3.2.2 ധෘਏԩण૳

ǎ☁⧕᧲ᇡḡ⋉ᕽᨱᕽ۵☖⧪᜽eᮡBPR (Bureau of Public Road)᜾ᮥ☁ݡಽ}ၽࡽ☖⧪పḡℕ⧉ᙹ(VDF; Volume-Delay Function) ᜾ᮥ ᱽ᜽⦹Ł ᯩᮝӹ VDF ⧉ᙹ᜾ᮡ ₉᳦ᄥᯕ ᦥܭ

ࠥಽᮁ⩶(Łᗮǎࠥ, ᯝၹǎࠥ, ḡႊࠥ)ᄥಽᱽ᜽ࡹᨕᯩŁ⡍ᰆᔢ

┽ࠥŁಅࢁᙹᨧᮝအಽࠥಽšญᇥ᧝ᨱᱢ⧊⦽༉⩶ᯕ௝Łᅕʑ

ᨕಖ݅. ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ᮹☖⧪᜽eᩩ⊂༉⩶ᮡaᰆᯝၹᱢᯙ⩶┽ᯙ

“ ᵝ⧪Ñญ/☖⧪ᗮࠥ” ⧉ᙹ᜾ᮥ঑෕Łᯩ݅. ঑௝ᕽእᬊᩩ⊂᮹

⧖ᝍᮡ⡍ᰆᔢ┽ʑၹ₉ప☖⧪ᗮࠥᩩ⊂༉⩶᮹}ၽᯕ௝ ⧁ᙹ

ᯩ݅.

Ʊ☖ᇥ᧝ᨱᕽ᮹₉పᬕ⧪ᗮࠥ(⪚ᮡ☖⧪᜽e)ᩩ⊂ᮡ⋝อ⦥░

ย(Kalman filtering), ᯙŖᝁĞ฾(artificial neural network), ⟝ ḡ(fuzzy)ᯕು॒ݡᇡᇥĞ⨹ᱢ/ၙ᜽ᱢšᱱᨱᕽᱲɝ⦹Łᯩʑ

ভྙᨱ⡍ᰆšญᇥ᧝᮹ᯝၹᱢᯱഭಽ۵ᱢᬊᯕ݅ᗭᨕಅᬑ໑,

ੱ⦽⡍ᰆᔢ┽ෝᄡᙹಽ⪽ᬊ⦹۵༉⩶ࠥ₟ᦥᅕʑᨕಖ݅. ⩥ᰍ

ǎࠥ⡍ᰆšญ᜽ᜅ▽ᨱᕽǍeᄥಽšญ⦹Łᯩ۵ᯱഭ۵ǎࠥƱ☖

ప᳑ᔍℕĥ(TMS; Traffic Monitoring System)ᨱᕽ᨜ᨕḡ۵ᩑ

⠪ɁᯝƱ☖ప(AADT: Average Annual Dairy Traffic) ᙹᵡᯕ໑, ʑ⦹Ǎ᳑ ᱶᅕࠥ ₉ಽᙹᨱ ⦽ᱶࡽ݅. ᩍʑᨱ, ᩑࠥᄥ ⡍ᰆᔢ┽

ᱶࠥaᇥᕾŝᱶ᮹ᵲeđŝಽ៉᨜ᨕḩᙹᯩ݅. ᷪ, ǎࠥᱥℕ᮹

Ǎeᄥ/₉᳦ᄥᬕ⧪ᗮࠥ᮹ᩩ⊂ᮡᙽᙹƱ☖ᇥ᧝᮹ᯝၹᱢšᱱᨱ ᕽእ⇵ᨕᅝভᔢݚᇡᇥaᱶᨱ᮹᳕⧁ᙹၷᨱᨧ۵ᔢ⫊ᯕ݅.

ᅙ ᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ ၙǎࠥಽᬊప⠙௭(HCM; Highway Capacity Manual) ᮹ʑᅙ}ֱᮥ᮲ᬊ⦹ᩍ⡍ᰆᔢ┽᪡Ʊ☖ඹ᮹ᩢ⨆ᯕ࠺᜽

ᨱŁಅࢉᮡྜྷು⩥ᰍ᮹ǎࠥ⡍ᰆšญ᜽ᜅ▽ᨱᕽᙹḲࡹŁᯩ۵

⦽ᱶࡽᯱഭอᮝಽࠥᩩ⊂⧁ᙹᯩ۵༉⩶ᮥ}ၽ⦹ᩡ݅. }ၽࡽ

༉⩶ᮡࠥಽ᮹ྜྷญᱢ/ᬕᩢᱢ⩥⫊(ࠥಽ᮹ᱽ⦽ᗮࠥ, Ğᔍࠥ, Ǖǎ

ࠥ, ࠥಽ⡎, ⡍ᰆᰆ┽)ෝ ☖⧕ ᯱᮁᗮࠥෝ ᩩ⊂⦽ ⬥, Ʊ☖ඹಽ

ᯙ⦽⇵aᱢqᗮᇥᮥᱢᬊ⦹۵Ǎ᳑ᯕ݅(Bennett et al., 2000;

TRB, 2000). ₙŁಽ Ğᔍ ॒᮹ ʑ⦹Ǎ᳑۵ ⨆⬥ ᯱഭ᮹ ⪶ᅕ

a܆ᖒᮥᩝࢱ⦹ᩍ༉⩶⪵ෝ⧩ḡอᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ᮹᜽ဍ౩ᯕᖹᨱ ᕽ۵ ༉ࢱ ⠪ḡಽ aᱶࡽ݅. ᅙ ᩑǍᨱᕽ ᱽ᜽⦽ ₉పᬕ⧪ᗮࠥ

ᩩ⊂༉⩶᮹aᰆⓑ✚Ḷᮡ᜽eݡᄥ༉⩶ᯕᦥܭᯝƱ☖పʑᵡᮝ ಽ༉⩶ᮥǍᖒ⧉ᮝಽ៉᜽ဍ౩ᯕᖹ᮹Ǎ᳑ෝⓍíeᗭ⪵⧩݅۵

ᱱᯕ݅. ᅕ☖Ʊ☖ᇥ᧝ᨱᕽ۵₉ಽ-݉᭥᜽eᮥʑᵡᮝಽƱ☖ඹෝ

ᇥᕾ⦹۵äᯕᯝၹᱢᯕӹᱥօ✙ᬭⓍ᮹᜽eݡᄥƱ☖పᯱഭෝ

⪶ᅕ⦹۵äᮡ⩥᜽ᱱᨱᕽ۵ᇩa܆⦹݅. ੱ⦽, ⡍ᰆšญᇥ᧝᮹

ᯝၹᱢᯙᇥᕾʑeᯕ30~40֥ᙹᵡᯕ௝۵ᱱᮥₙ᯲⦹໕༉⩶᮹

eᗭ⪵۵ ᇩa⦝⦹݅.

3.2.3 ֗ധॷճण૳

Ʊ☖ᔍŁእᬊᮡ᭥⨹ᨱי⇽ࡽᱶࠥ, ᷪ“ᔍŁᮉŝᵝ⧪Ñญ”᮹

⧉ᙹಽᔑᱶ⦹۵äᯕᯝၹᱢᯕ݅. ḡ⋉ᕽᨱ۵Łᗮǎࠥ, ᯝၹǎࠥ, ḡႊࠥෝʑᵡᮝಽ≉⧊ࡽⅾᵝ⧪Ñญ᪡ ᔍŁᮁ⩶ᄥၽᔾශᮥ

Łಅ⦹ᩍᔍŁÕᙹ/ᔍ฾ᯱᙹ/ᇡᔢᯱᙹෝᩩ⊂⦽݅. ᯕෝəݡಽ

঑෕í ࡹ໕ օ✙ᬭⓍ ᙹᵡ᮹ ༉⩶ᯕ ࡹʑ ভྙᨱ ࠥಽǍeᄥ

Ʊ☖ᔍŁÕᙹၰእᬊᔑᱶᯕᇩa܆⦹Ł⡍ᰆᔢ┽ ੱ⦽ᄡᙹಽ

(7)

⪽ᬊࢁᙹᨧ݅. ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ḡ⋉ᕽᨱᕽᱽ᜽⦹۵ᔍŁᮁ⩶᮹

Ǎᇥŝᬱ݉᭥⪽ᬊǍ᳑۵ əݡಽᮁḡ⦹ࡹᯕෝǍeʑᵡᮝಽ

ᄡ⪹⦹ᩍ ⡍ᰆᔢ┽ᨱ ঑ෙ ᩢ⨆ᮥ ༉⩶⪵⦹Łᯱ ⦹ᩡ݅.

ᔍᝅƱ☖ᔍŁaၽᔾ⦽ݚ᜽᮹⡍ᰆᔢ┽ෝ᳑ᔍ⦹ḡᦫ۵༉⩶

⪵aᨕಅᬑအಽᯕᨱš⦽༉⩶ᯕӹᖁ⧪ᩑǍࠥ₟ᦥᅕʑᨕಖ݅.

ə్ӹ↽ɝChan et al. (2009)ᮡၙǎ▭օ᜽(Tennessee)ᵝ᮹

ႊݡ⦽Ʊ☖ᔍŁᯕಆߑᯕ░ᄁᯕᜅ᪡⡍ᰆšญ᜽ᜅ▽᮹ᯱഭෝ

ᩑ࠺⦹ᩍ ᔍŁ᮹ ݅᧲⦽ ᬱᯙᨱ ݡ⧕ ᇥᕾᮥ ᜽ࠥ⦽ ၵ ᯩ݅.

Chan et al. (2009) ᯕᱽ᜽⦽༉⩶᜾ᮡᯙ⊹-ษᯝ(mile) ݉᭥ಽ

ᱽ᜽ࡹᨕᯩᨕᯕෝm/km݉᭥ಽᄡ⪹᜽┉⬥ᖅ໦ᄡᙹᨱ᳦݉⠪

┥ᖒ(IRI; International Roughness Index)ෝݡ᯦᜽┅۵ᯝၹ

⪵᯲ᨦᯕ⦥᫵⦹݅. ੱ⦽, ᬑญӹ௝᪡ၙǎ᮹Ʊ☖⪹Ğ, ჶȽ,

ࠥಽǍ᳑, ᬕᱥ⧪┽aݍ௝༉⩶᮹ᯕᱥᖒᨱݡ⦽ם௡ᯕᯩᮥ

ᙹᯩʑভྙᨱᅕᱶ➊░ෝ᯦ࠥ⦹ᩍ݅ᮭŝzᯕ༉⩶ᮥᰍǍᖒ

⦹ᩡ݅.

(1)

ᩍʑᕽ,

NA

pys

: Ǎe s, ᇥᕾᩑࠥ yᨱᕽ᮹ Ʊ☖ᔍŁ Õᙹ p R

p

: ᔍŁᮁ⩶ p᮹ Ʊ☖ᔍŁᮉ

p : ᯙᱢᔍŁ(ᔍ฾/ᇡᔢ)᪡ ྜྷᱢᔍŁ(₉ప/ݡྜྷ⦝⧕) ⱬ : ༉⩶ ᅕᱶĥᙹ (default = 3.23)

a

1

~a

3

: ༉⩶ĥᙹ(☖⧊᳑Õ: -5.833, 0.657, 0.005) (Chan et al., 2009).

Eq. (1)ᨱᕽ᮹ᅕᱶĥᙹⱬ۵༉⩶ᯱℕaࠥಽᩑᰆᮥʑᵡᮝಽ

⦹Łᯩʑভྙᨱ1kmݚၽᔾÕᙹ᮹እᮉᮥŁಅ⦹ᩍᔑᱶ⦹ᩡ݅.

ǎ☁⧕᧲ᇡḡ⋉ᕽᨱᕽ۵2009֥☖ĥᯱഭෝʑᵡᮝಽ⦹Łᯩᮝ အಽ, ݚ᜽᮹ǎࠥ⠪ɁIRI(2.646m/km)s(⦽ǎÕᖅʑᚁᩑǍᬱ

ԕᇡᯱഭ⪽ᬊ)ŝAADT(12,374ݡ/ᯝ) (TMS, 2012), ǎࠥᩑᰆ (13,464.2km, ᜽šญǍe⡍⧉, ၙ}☖/ၙ⡍ᰆࠥ۵ᱽ᫙) (Statistics Korea, 2012)ᮥ༉⩶ᨱݡ᯦⦹ᩍᅕᱶĥᙹෝᔑ⇽⦽đŝⱬ۵

3.23 ᮝಽ ᔑᱶࡹᨩ݅.

3.2.4 ୋ޹֗ധ߆ુ౸ࡦ෴

ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽᱽᦩ⦽ᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊᇥᕾ༉⩶ᮡᩑࠥʑᵡ༉⩶ᮝ ಽᇥᕾʑeԕԕ₉᳦/ᩑࠥ/ǍeᄥƱ☖పᯕ᫵Ǎࡽ݅. ᯕ౑Ğᬑ

ᇥᕾⅩʑᩑࠥ᮹Ʊ☖✚ᖒ(AADT, ₉᳦Ǎᖒእ)ᮥᇥᕾʑeҾʭ

ḡᮁḡ⦹۵Ɂᯝ႑ᱶჶᯕӹ᷾qශᮥᱢᬊ⦽ᅖญ᷾aჶᮥ⪽ᬊ

⦹íࡹ۵ߑ, ᰆʑᇥᕾʑeᮝಽᯙ⧕ᩩ⊂Ʊ☖పᯕᬊపᮥⅩŝ⧕

ქญ۵᪅ඹෝ႑ᱽ⦹ʑ᭥⧕ᅕ☖Ɂᯝ႑ᱶჶᯕ޵ฯᯕ⪽ᬊ⦹Ł

ᯩ݅(Do et al., 2006, 2007; Han et al., 2007, 2012a, 2012b).

ə్ӹᩍʑᨱᕽᬑญ۵⧎ᔢթྕᛞíaᱶ⧕ქญ۵ᯕᰆ௹

Ʊ☖పᨱݡ⧕ᕽŁₑ⧕ᅝ⦥᫵aᯩ݅. ຝᱡ, 1) ǎࠥƱ☖ప᳑ᔍℕ ĥ᮹᳑ᔍ✚ᖒᔢAVC(Automatic Vehicle Classification)ᰆእ

ෝ⪽ᬊ⦹۵ᔢ᜽᳑ᔍǍeᯕᦥܩ໕Ʊ☖పᯱഭaእᱶᔢᱢᯝ

a܆ᖒᯕᯩ݅. 2) ੱ⦽, ᇥᕾaaᩑǍ༊ᱢᮥ∊᳒᜽┅ʑ᭥⧕

ᯙ᭥ᱢᮝಽ ⧊ݚ⦽ ᯲᳑⦹۵ ᜽ࠥ⦹۵ Ğᬑࠥ ᩩᔢ⧁ ᙹ ᯩ݅.

3) ษḡสᮝಽᇥᕾᯱℕa᜽ဍ౩ᯕᖹ᮹ᖒĊᮥு۵อⓝƱ☖ప ᮹᷾q✚ᖒ(ᇥᔑ, ḡᩎᖒ, ᯥĥ✚ᖒ॒)ᯕᅕ݅⩥ᝅᱢᮝಽཹᔍࢁ

⦥᫵aᯩ݅. ᯕᨱᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵Ɂᯝ႑ᱶჶ᫙ᨱ1)Ŗeᯕ࠺⩶-

݅ᇥ⡍-།▭⋕ෝಽ(Monte-Carlo) ʑჶ, 2)݉ᯝŖe-݉ᇥ⡍-།▭

⋕ෝಽʑჶᮥ}ၽ⦹ᩍᯕᬊᯱaᇥᕾ᜽ᖁ┾⧁ᙹᯩࠥಾ⦹ᩡ

݅. ༉⩶᮹ ᯕುᱢ ႑Ğŝ ᔢᖙ⦽ ʑჶᮡ ⨆⬥ םྙᨱᕽ ᝍࠥ

ᯩí ݅൉ʑಽ ⦽݅.

3.2.5 ఙஂंࠑ׆ஜ୍୨ࠩ

᧲ᱢᯙƱ☖పᮡྜྷುḩᱢᯙ₉᳦᮹Ǎᖒᮡࠥಽ❭ᗱŝᱶᮡ

ྜྷುࠥಽᯕᬊᯱእᬊ᮹ᔑᱶᨱᵲ᫵⦽ᄡᙹᯕ݅. ✚⯩₉᳦᮹✚ᖒ ( Ʊ☖⦹ᵲ, ᜚₉ᯙᬱ॒) ᱶ᮹۵ๅᬑᵲ᫵⦽ᔍ⧎ᯕ݅. ǎࠥƱ☖ప

᳑ᔍℕĥ۵ 12᳦ᮥ ʑᵡᮝಽ ₉᳦ᮥ Ǎᇥ⦹Ł ᯩᮝӹ(TMS, 2012), ǎࠥ⡍ᰆšญ᜽ᜅ▽ᮡ7᳦ᮝಽᇥඹ⦹Łᯩᮝ໑, ə᫙

ǎ☁⧕᧲ᇡḡ⋉ᕽᨱᕽࠥ༉⩶ᄥಽ݅ෙ ₉᳦ʑᵡᮥᱢᬊ⦹Ł

ᯩ݅. ᯝၹᱢᮝಽ ₉᳦᮹ Ǎᇥᮡ 1) ₉ప᮹ ᫙⩶ ၰ ᯕᬊ✚ᖒ, 2) ₉ప ݉᭥ ᙹ, 3) ᜚₉ᱶᬱ(᜚⧊₉᮹ Ğᬑ), 3) ₉ప ⇶ ᙹ, 4) ၵ⒕ᙹ, 5) ⪵ྜྷᬕᬊప॒ᮥₙ᳑⦹ᩍđᱶࡹӹ(Han, 2011;

FHWA, 2001; Bennett et al., 2000; KICT, 2008), šಉྙ⨭

ԕ⡍⧉ࡽᱶᅕ᮹⦽ĥಽ⪵ྜྷᬕᬊపŝ᜚₉ᱶᬱᮥᵲᝍᮝಽᰍ⠙

ᖒᮥ᜽ࠥ⦹ᩡ݅. ᦥᬙ్ᇥᕾᨱ⦥᫵⦽₉᳦Ǎᖒእ۵ࠥಽƱ☖ప

☖ĥᩑᅕ᮹aᰆ↽ɝᱶᅕᯙ2008~2011֥᮹⠪Ɂ⊹ෝ⪽ᬊ⦹ᩡ

݅. ₉᳦ᰍǍᖒŝšಉࡽŁₑᮥ☖⧕ᬑญӹ௝ŖŖᇡྙᨱᕽ⪽ᬊ

ࡹŁᯩ۵₉᳦Ǎᇥʑᵡeᨱᔢݚ⦽₉ᯕaᯩᮭᮥ᦭ᙹᯩᨩ݅.

ᯕ్⦽₉ᯕ۵ᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊ᮹Ƚ༉۵ྜྷುࠥಽ⡍ᰆ᮹ᖒ܆ᇥᕾ ᨱࠥ ฯᮡ ᩢ⨆ᮥ ၙ⊹ʑ ভྙᨱ ☖⧊⩶ ₉᳦ᇥඹʑᵡᨱ š⦽

ᩑǍa ᜽ɪ⦹݅.

4. ᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊᇥᕾ༉⩶ᮥ⪽ᬊ⦽ᮁḡᅕᙹᱥఖ

ᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊᇥᕾᮥ ⪽ᬊ⦽ ᮁḡᅕᙹ ᱥఖᙹพᮥ ᭥⧕ ᱥℕ

ǎࠥෝݡᔢᮝಽᇥᕾ⦹۵ႊᦩࠥá☁⧕ᅕᦹᮝӹ, ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ

(8)

Table 3. A brief summary of simulation options

Contents Definitions

Section info.

(A virtual section representing Korean

national highways)

Geometric condition

Road design: unit length=1km, num. of lanes = 2.91, width of a lane=3.5m, shoulder =1.5m Slope and horizontal curvature: straight (assumption)

Traffic condition AADT: 12,516 (TMS,2011), uniformed during analysis period Speed limit: 80km/h

Pavement deterioration characteristics

Deterioration index

Initial condition

(averaged condition in 2011)

Maintenance effect

(Reset condition) Deterioration speed

Crack 3.535% 0.00%

Refer to Table 4

Rutting 7.351mm 2.00mm

IRI 2.295m/km 1.00m/km

Analysis period and discount rate 30 years, 5.5% (MLTM, 2011)

Table 4. Pavement condition rating systems and corresponding pavement deterioration speeds

Condition states

Standard for ratings Life expectancy by a rating Deterioration speed by a rating Crack

(%)

Rutting (mm)

IRI (m/km)

Crack (year)

Rutting (year)

IRI (year)

Crack (%/year)

Rutting (mm/year)

IRI (m/km/year)

1 ~0.5 5 2 1.53 2.39 2.03 0.33 2.09 0.99

2 ~5 10 2.5 4.19 14.23 1.55 1.07 0.35 0.32

3 ~10 15 3 2.27 15.99 1.56 2.20 0.31 0.32

4 ~15 20 3.5 1 6.35 1.35 5.00 0.79 0.37

5 15~ 20~ 3.5~ - - - -

Source: Han et al. (2012c)

Table 5. Definition of maintenance alternative sets

Alternatives Cutting + Rut-resist pavement 50mm overlay

Cutting + Conventional hot-mix asphalt 50mm overlay

Conventional hot-mix asphalt

50mm overlay Note

Alternative 1 Rutting 15mm 1) Crack 20% or 2) Rutting 10mm

1) Crack 10% or 2) Rutting 10mm Alternative 2(Current

criteria) (KICT,2009) Rutting 20mm 1) Crack 30% or 2) Rutting 15mm

1) Crack 20% or

2) Rutting 10mm Base alternative Alternative 3 Rutting 25mm 1) Crack 35% or

2) Rutting 20mm

1) Crack 25% or 2) Rutting 15mm Alternative 4 Rutting 30mm 1) Crack 40% or

2) Rutting 25mm

1) Crack 30% or 2) Rutting 20mm Maintenance unit costs

(Million KRW/lane/km) 71.31 55.23 40.04

ᱽ᜽⦽ᇥᕾ༉⩶᮹ᩩ⊂✚ᖒᮥ⡍ᰆᔢ┽᪡ᩑĥ⦹۵äᯕᩑǍ᮹

༊ᱢᨱᇡ⧊ࡽ݅Ł❱݉⦹ᩍǎࠥ᮹✚ᖒᮥݡ⢽⦹۵⦹ӹ᮹aᔢ Ǎeᮥอॅᨕ݅᧲⦽ᮁḡᅕᙹᱥఖᮥʑᵡᮝಽ⦽༉⩶᮹ၝqࠥ

ෝ⪶ᯙ⧕ᅕᦹ݅. ᅙᱩᨱᕽ۵1) ᮁḡᅕᙹݡᦩᄥ⡍ᔢᔢ┽ᄡ⪵ŝ ᱶ ၰ ࠥಽᕽእᜅ ᙹᵡ, 2) ࠥಽᔢ┽ᄡ⪵ᨱ ঑ෙ ₉పᬕ⧪ᗮࠥ, ᯕᬊᯱၰᔍ⫭⪹Ğእᬊ᮹ᄡ⪵ŝᱶ, 3) ᮁḡᅕᙹݡᦩᄥᔾᧁᵝʑ እᬊၰĞᱽᖒ, 4) ₉పᗮࠥᄡ⪵ಽᯙ⦽⠙ᯖ᮹ᯝၹ⪵ᨱݡ⧕

Łₑ⧕ ᅕʑಽ ⦽݅.

4.1 ंজ૑঵ࢫକ஺࣪৤۩ੲড୨

ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽᱽ᜽ࡽ⦽ǎ⩶ᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊᇥᕾ༉⩶ᮡǎࠥෝ

ݡᔢᮝಽ}ၽࡹᨩʑǎࠥ᪡šಉࡽᯱഭॅᮥ᳦⧊⧕ᇥᕾ᪖ᖹᮥ

đᱶ⦹ᩡ݅. ǎࠥ᮹Ʊ☖✚ᖒᮡaᰆ↽ᝁ᮹ࠥಽƱ☖ప☖ĥᩑᅕ (TMS, 2012) ෝ⪽ᬊ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ⡍ᰆ❭ᗱᗮࠥ۵ǎࠥᱥℕ⡍ᰆᔢ

┽ᯱഭෝ⪽ᬊ⦽ᩑǍᵲaᰆ↽ɝᩑǍᯙHan et al. (2012c)᮹

đŝෝₙ᳑⦹ᩡ݅. ⦽⠙, ݡ⢽Ǎeᮥ݉᭥kmಽᖅᱶ⦹ᩡʑভྙ

ᨱࠥ⇽ࡽđŝᨱᱥǎࠥᩑᰆᮥŁಅ⧕ᵝ໕ǎࠥᱥℕෝݡᔢᮝಽ

⦽ ᜽ဍ౩ᯕᖹ᮹ ɝᔍ⊹ෝ ᨜ᮥ ᙹ ᯩ݅.

(9)

Fig. 2. Pavement condition changing history by deterioration indices (a case: base alternative)

Fig. 3. Changing history of roughness (IRI) by maintenance alternatives

Table 6. A relationship between average pavement condition and vehicle operating speed

Alternative Crack (%)

Rutting (mm)

IRI (m/km)

Average vehicle speed (km/h)

Num. of maintenance

Alternative 1 4.96 7.25 3.68 73.81 2

Alternative 2

(Current criteria) 5.45 7.42 3.77 73.69 2

Alternative 3 11.51 9.70 5.00 72.17 1

Alternative 4 14.75 10.79 5.76 71.22 1

Fig. 4. Changing vehicle operating speed by pavement condition (A case: IRI, base alternative)

Fig. 5. Changing socio-environmental costs by pavement condition (A case: IRI, base alternative)

⦽⠙, ᇥᕾݡᦩᮝಽ۵⩥ᰍǎࠥ᮹ᮁḡᅕᙹʑᵡᮥʑᵡݡᦩ (base alternative)ᮝಽᖅᱶ⦹Łӹນḡ3}ݡᦩᮡᅕᙹŖჶᮡ

əݡಽᮁḡ⦹ʑಽ⦹ࡹ, ᮁḡᅕᙹ(ᔢ┽ᱢ)᜽ᱱอᮥᄡĞ⦹ᩍᱢ ᬊ⦹ᩡ݅. ᷪ, ⩥⧪ ᮁḡᅕᙹʑᵡᮥ ᄡĞ⦹໕ ၽᔾ⦹۵ Ğᱽᱢ

⠙ᯖ⪚ᮡᗱᝅᨱݡ⦽ᱲɝᯕ௝Ł⧁ᙹᯩ݅. ᇥᕾ᪖ᖹᮥTable 3~Table 5ᨱ ᫵᧞⦹ᩡ݅.

4.2 କ஺࣪৤۩ੲ࣢එୋঃ೾࣡ฃ

Fig. 2 ᨱᕽ۵⩥⧪ᮁḡᅕᙹݡᦩ(ݡᦩ2)᮹❭ᗱḡ⢽ᄥᔢ┽ᄡ

⪵ŝᱶᮥ ᅕᩍᵝŁ ᯩ݅. ᬑᖁ ݅ᙹ ❭ᗱᗮࠥෝ ᱢᬊ⧉ᨱ ঑௝

እᖁ⩶ᮝಽ⡍ᰆᔢ┽aᄡ⪵⧉ᮥᅝᙹᯩ݅. Fig. 3ᨱᕽ۵bʑ

݅ෙᅕᙹʑᵡᮥᱢᬊ⧉ᨱ঑௝⡍ᰆᔢ┽ᄡ⪵ŝᱶᯕ݅෕íḥ⧪

ࡹ໕ᕽօ✙ᬭⓍ᮹ᕽእᜅᙹᵡᯕ݅෕íᮁḡࡹ۵äᮥ⪶ᯙ⧁

ᙹᯩ݅. ⦽⠙, Table 6ᨱᕽ۵ݡᦩᄥօ✙ᬭⓍᙹᵡᨱᕽ᮹⠪Ɂ⡍

ᰆᔢ┽᪡₉పᬕ⧪ᗮࠥෝእƱ⦹Łᯩ۵ߑ, ᅕᙹݡᦩe₉పᬕ⧪

ᗮࠥ᮹ ↽ݡ⠙₉۵ 2.59km/hಽ ӹ┡ԍ݅.

4.3 ܑߦঃ೾࣡ฃ઩ݗࠛଲ૳ୀࢫॷฎฅլण૳࣡ฃ

⩥⧪ᮁḡᅕᙹʑᵡ(ݡᦩ2)ᮥݡᔢᮝಽ⡍ᰆᔢ┽a₉పᬕ⧪ᗮ

ࠥ᪡ ᯕᬊᯱ ၰ ᔍ⫭⪹Ğእᬊᨱ ၙ⊹۵ ᩢ⨆ᨱ ݡ⧕ ᔕ⠕ᅕ໕

(Fig. 4 ₙ᳑) ᇥᕾʑeԕIRI᮹↽ᗭ-↽ݡ⊹۵1.00~6.50m/kmಽ

ݚ᜽᮹₉పᬕ⧪ᗮࠥ۵bb77.12~70.31km/hᩡ݅. ᯕভ᮹ᬕ⧪

ᗮࠥ᮹⠙₉۵6.81km/hಽᖁ⩶ᄡ⪵ෝaᱶ⦹໕IRI 1.00m/kmݚ

1.24km/haqᗭ⦽݅Łᅝᙹᯩ݅. ᯕ۵ʑ᳕ᩑǍ(Morosiuk et al., 1982; Watanatada, 1981) ᨱᕽbbᱽ᜽⦹Łᯩ۵݉᭥

qᗭప0.62~2.57km/h/IRI᮹ჵ᭥ᨱ⡍⧉ࡽ݅. Fig. 5ᨱᕽ۵IRI ᔢ┽ᨱ঑ෙᯕᬊᯱၰᔍ⫭⪹Ğእᬊ᮹ᄡ⪵ŝᱶᨱݡ⧕ᅕᩍᵝŁ

ᯩ݅. ᩎ᜽⡍ᰆᔢ┽ᨱ঑௝ၝq⦹íၹ᮲⦹Łᯩᮝ໑, ᇥᕾʑe

ԕIRI᮹⠙₉a↽ݡaࡹ۵ࢱ᜽ᱱᨱᕽ᮹ࠥಽᯕᬊᯱၰᔍ⫭⪹

Ğእᬊ᮹₉ᯕෝ݉᭥⪵⦹໕586.13႒อᬱ/km/֥ᮝಽə₉ᯕa

(10)

Table 7. LCC in EUAC by alternatives (discount rate 5.5%) (Unit: Million KRW/year)

Alternative Maintenance cost Vehicle operating cost Travel time cost Traffic accident cost Emission cost Total cost

Alternative 1 74.99 14,714.76 16,021.67 2,757.55 5,634.71 39,203.69

Alternative 2 68.59 14,724.17 16,058.13 2,908.17 5,637.46 39,396.52

Alternative 3 23.22 14,815.57 16,404.95 4,739.54 5,662.93 41,646.21

Alternative 4 18.75 14,856.08 16,552.43 5,955.41 5,673.18 43,055.86

Table 8. An economic evaluation by alternative (base alternative = current criteria) (Unit: Million KRW/year)

Alternative Cost Benefit NPV NPV/Cost EUAC* Benefit by unit vehicle speed (per 1km)

Alternative 1 6.40 199.22 192.83 30.14 2,155.20 90.63

Alternative 2 - - - - 2,165.81 -

Alternative 3 -45.37 -2,295.06 -2,249.69 N/A 2,289.54 -81.14

Alternative 4 -49.85 -3,709.19 -3,659.34 N/A 2,367.07 -81.53

Note: *represent the EUAC of total cost in Table 7

ᔢݚ⧉ᮥ᦭ᙹᯩ݅. ᯕෝᱥℕօ✙ᬭⓍಽ⪶ᰆ᜽┅໕⦽⧕ࠥಽš ญಽ ᨜ᮥ ᙹ ᯩ۵ ⠙ᯖ᮹ ⦽ĥჵ᭥ෝ ᦭ ᙹ ᯩ݅.

4.4 କ஺࣪৤۩ੲ࣢঍઀ச׆ण૳ࢫլ୪ंজ

ᮁḡᅕᙹݡᦩᄥᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊŝᩩᔑ᮹እᬊ-⬉ᮉᖒᮥᔕ⠕ᅕ ʑಽ⦽݅. ⩥ᰍᮁḡᅕᙹʑᵡ(ݡᦩ2) ݡእ⇵aಽᗭ᫵ࡹ۵šญ

ᯱእᬊᮥእᬊᮝಽᖅᱶ⦹Łəಽ᨜ᨕḡ۵ᯕᬊᯱၰᔍ⫭⪹Ğእ ᬊ᮹qᗭᇥᮥ⠙ᯖᮝಽᱶ᮹⦽݅. Ğᱽᖒ⠪aḡ⢽ಽ۵ǎ☁⧕᧲

ᇡḡ⋉ᕽᨱᕽᱽ᜽⦹Łᯩ۵እᬊ⠙ᯖእ(Benefit Cost Ratio)᪡

ᙽ⩥ᰍa⊹(Net Present Value)ෝࠥ⇽⦹Ł, ᩍʑᨱᩩ⊂ࡽእᬊᮥ

ᩑ⠪Ɂ࠺॒a⊹ಽ⢽⩥⦹۵EUAC(Equivalent Uniform Annual Cost)ෝ ⇵aಽ ᯦ࠥ⧕ ޵ ᛍᬕ ᯕ⧕ෝ ࠶Łᯱ ⦹ᩡ݅.

Table 7 ŝTable 8ᨱᕽӹ┡ӽၵ᪡zᯕݡᦩ1ᯕᔢݡᱢᮝಽ

ⓑᮁḡᅕᙹእᬊᮥᅕᯕḡอĞᱽᖒᮡaᰆᬑᙹ⦽äᮝಽӹ┡ԍ

݅. ⅾእᬊᮥᩑ⠪Ɂ॒aಽ⢽⩥⦽EUAC᮹Ğᬑ1,060อᬱ/km/

֥᮹⠙ᯖᯕၽᔾ⦹۵äᮝಽᩩ⊂ࡹᨩ݅. ⦽⠙Table 6ᨱᕽݡᦩ

e↽ݡ⠪Ɂᬕ⧪ᗮࠥ᮹₉ᯕ۵2.59kmಽᬕᱥᯱa70km/hಽ

ᵝ⧪᜽Ⓧíᯙḡ⧁อ⦽ᙹᵡᮡᦥܩӹ, ᯕಽᯙ⦽⠙ᯖᮡᬕ⧪ᗮࠥ

1km/hݚᩑe8,114~9,093อᬱᙹᵡᯕ݅. ᯕෝᱥǎǎࠥօ✙ᬭ

Ⓧᩑᰆᯙ11,328.6kmಽ⪹ᔑ⦹໕↽ᗭ9,100ᨖᬱ/֥ᨱᮂၶ⦽݅.

ᯕ۵᪽ᬑญaࠥಽᯱᔑšญᨱᵝ༊⧕᧝⦹۵ḡᨱݡ⦽ᯕᮁෝ

᯹ ᖅ໦⧕ ᵝŁ ᯩ݅.

5. đುၰ⨆⬥ᩑǍ

ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ᬑญӹ௝ǎࠥᮁḡᅕᙹᝅᱶᨱᱢ⧊⦽⦽ǎ⩶

ᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊᇥᕾ༉⩶ᮥ}ၽ⦹ᩍᅕ݅⩥ᝅᱢᯙ᮹ᔍđᱶᮥ࠶

Łᯱ⦹ᩡ݅. ᯱʑ⪵ࡽᇥᕾ᜽ᜅ▽}ၽ᮹⧖ᝍᮡࠥಽ❭ᗱŝᱶ

ၰᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊᩩ⊂༉⩶᮹ǎԕ⪵, ǎࠥᮁḡᅕᙹᝅᱶ᮹ၹᩢ,

༉⩶⪽ᬊ᮹ᬊᯕᖒ⪶ᅕəญŁࠥಽ⡍ᰆᔢ┽ෝɝÑಽ⦽ᔾᧁᵝ ʑእᬊ༉⩶᮹ᱽ᜽௝⧁ᙹᯩ݅. ᯕෝ᭥⧕ᬑญӹ௝Ʊ☖᜽ᖅ⚍ᯱ

⠪aḡ⋉᮹ԕᬊᮥ∊ᝅ⯩ၹᩢ⦹ࡹ, ࠥಽᯱᔑšญ}ֱŝᬑญӹ

௝ǎࠥᮁḡšญ⩥ᝅᨱᇡᱢ⧊⦽ᔍ⧎ॅᨱݡ⧕ᕽ۵ᰍᱶ᮹, ᙹᱶ,

⇵a॒᮹᯲ᨦᮥ☖⧕ᇥᕾ༉⩶᮹✡ŝᖙᇡ༉⩶ᮥᱶ᮹⦹ᩡ݅.

ᔍಡᇥᕾᮝಽ۵ǎࠥ᮹⠪Ɂᱢ✚ᖒᮥaḥaᔢǍeᨱ݅᧲⦽

ᮁḡᅕᙹݡᦩ(⩥⧪ʑᵡ⡍⧉)ᮥᱢᬊ⦹ᩍᱽᦩ༉⩶᮹ᩩ⊂✚ᖒᮥ

⮱෥ᮥ᯹ၹᩢ⦹Łᯩᮭᮥ⪶ᯙ⦹ᩡ݅. ✚⯩IRI 1.00m/kma

᷾a⦹໕₉ప᮹ᬕ⧪ᗮࠥa1.24km/haqᗭ⦹۵äᮝಽᇥᕾࡹ

ᨩᮝ໑, ᇥᕾ֥ࠥ ᵲ ᳦݉⠪┥ᖒ᮹ ⠙₉a ↽ݡᩡ޹ ࢱ ᜽ᱱ᮹

ࠥಽᯕᬊᯱ ၰ ᔍ⫭⪹Ğእᬊ᮹ ₉ᯕෝ እƱ⧕ ᅙ đŝ 586.13 ႒อᬱ/km/֥ᮝಽə₉ᯕaᔢݚ⧉ᮥ᦭ᙹᯩᨩ݅. ᯕ۵ࠥಽᮁḡ šญᨱ঑ෙ⠙ᯖ᮹ᯥĥsᮝಽ“ࠥಽᯱᔑšญᇥ᧝”ᨱݡ⦽׳ᮡ

a܆ᖒᮥ ⪶ᯙ⧩݅Ł ⧁ ᙹ ᯩ݅.

ᅙםྙᨱᕽᱽ᜽⦽ᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊᇥᕾ༉⩶ᮡᵲᰆʑ⠪a༉⩶

ᵲ⦹ӹಽᮁḡᅕᙹᱥఖᨱ঑ෙօ✙ᬭⓍᙹᵡᨱᕽ᮹Ŗᬊᖒŝ

Ğᱽᖒᮥ⠪a⧁ᙹᯩࠥಾ༉⩶⪵ࡹᨩ݅. ᯕ۵ࠥಽᯱᔑšญෝ

᭥⦽ᇥᕾ༉⩶ᵲaᰆᯝၹᱢᯙ⩶┽ಽ⨆⬥ᨱᅕ݅Ǎℕᱢᯕ໕ᕽ

ࠥ฿∅⩶ ᱶᅕෝ ࠥ⇽⦹ʑ᭥⦽ ᯱʑ⪵ ᜽ᜅ▽}ၽᨱ ᵲ᫵⦽

ᖁ⧪ᩑǍಽ ⪽ᬊࢁ ᙹ ᯩᮥ äᯕ݅.

⨆⬥ᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ᬑᖁᅙᩑǍᨱᕽǍℕᱢᮝಽʑᚁ⦹ḡ༜⧩޹

ᖙᇡ༉⩶᮹ ⧖ᝍᔍ⧎ᨱ ݡ⦽ ᝍࠥ ᯩ۵ Łₑᯕ ᯕ൉ᨕᲙ᧝ ⧁

(11)

äᯕ݅. ੱ⦽, ⩥ᝅ᮹ᱶᅕᙹ᫵ෝᅕ݅ᱶ⪶⦹í∊᳒᜽┍ᙹᯩ۵

฿∅⩶ᇥᕾ༉⩶ᯕ݅᧲⦽⩶┽ಽ}ၽࡹᨕ᧝⧁äᯕ໑, ə᫙

ᇥᕾđŝ᮹ᝁ഑ᖒᮥ׳ᯕʑ᭥⦽₉᳦Ǎᇥᨱš⦽☖⧊ᩑǍ, ʑݡ ᙹ໦᮹ᇥᔑŁಅ, ᰆ௹ࠥ᜽}ၽĥ⫮ᮥŁಅ⦽ᵲᰆʑƱ☖ప⇵ᱶ

ႊᦩᨱݡ⦽ᩑǍa⦥᫵⦹໑, ə᫙ᩩᔑᱽ᧞ၰࠥಽ᳑ᔍeĊᮝಽ

ᯙ⧕ ၽᔾ⦹۵ ᮁḡᅕᙹḡℕᨱ š⦽ ᱲɝᮥ ☖⧕ ᅕ݅ ⩥ᝅᮥ

᯹ ཹᔍ⦹۵ ᇥᕾ༉⩶ᯕ ࡹᨕ᧝ ⧁ äᯕ݅.

References

American Association of State Highway Officals (AASHTO) (1978).

A manual on user benefit analysis of highway and bus transit improvements, American Association of State Highway Officials, Washington, D.C.

Bennett, C. R. (1989). The New Zealand vehicle operating cost model, RRU Bulletin 82, Transit New Zealand, Wellington.

Bennett, C. R. and Greenwood, I. D. (2000). Highway development and management series vol. 7: Modeling Road User and Environmental Effects in HDM-4, The World Road Association (PIARC), La Defense.

Bonney, R. S. P. and Stevens, M. F. (1967). Vehicle operating costs on bituminous, gravel and earth roads in East and Central Africa, Road Research Technical Paper No. 76, Ministry of Transport, London.

Chan, C. Y., Huang, B., Yan, X. and Richards, S. H. (2009).

“Effects of asphalt pavement conditions on traffic accidents in tennessee utilizing pavement management system.” Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2009, Paper #09-2054, Trans- portation Research Board (TRB), Washington, D.C.

Chatti, K. and Zaabar, I. (2012). NCHRP Report 720: Estimating the effects of pavement condition on vehicle operating costs, Trans- portation Research Board (TRB), Washington, D.C.

de Weille, J. (1966). Quantification of road user savings, World Bank Staff Occasional Paper No.2, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Do, M.-S., Han, D.-S., Yoo, I.-K. and Lee, S.-H. (2006). “Performance and economic analysis for rut-resistance pavement considering life cycle cost.” J. of the Korean Society of Civil Engineering, Vol. 26, No. 5D, pp. 783-796 (in Korean).

Do, M.-S., Han, D.-S., Lee, J.-D. and Lee, Y.-U. (2007). “Economic analysis for road pavement maintenance by using HDM.” J. of the Korean Society of Civil Engineering, Vol. 27, No. 3D, pp.

311-323 (in Korean)

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (2001). Traffic monitor- ing guide, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (1998). Life-cycle cost analysis in pavement design: in search of better investment deci- sions, FHWA-SA-98-079, Federal highway Administration, Was- hington, DC, U.S.

Goodman, A. S. and Hastak, M. (2006). Infrastructure planning

handbook: planning, Engineering, and Economics, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Press, McGRAW-HILL, U.S.

Han, D.-S. (2011). Development of open-source hybrid pavement management system for an international standard, A PhD. Dis- sertation, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Han, D.-S. and Do, M.-S. (2012a). “Estimation of life expectancy and budget demands based on maintenance strategy.” J. of the Korean Society of Civil Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 6D, pp. 345-356 (in Korean).

Han, D.-S. and Do, M.-S. (2012b). “Life cycle cost analysis on pavement inspection intervals considering delay in maintenance.”

KSCE J. of Civil Engineering (in review).

Han, D.-S., Kaito, K. and Kobayashi, K. (2012c). “Application of Bayesian estimation method with Markov hazard model to improve deterioration forecasts for infrastructure management.”

KSCE J. of Civil Engineering (in review).

Han, D.-S. Do, M.-S., Kim, S.-H. and Kim, J.-H. (2007). “Life cycle cost analysis of pavement maintenance standard considering user and socio-environmental cost.” J. of the Korean Society of Civil Engineering, Vol. 27, No. 6D, pp. 727-740 (in Korean).

Hide, H., Abaynayaka, S. W., Sayer, I. and Wyatt, R. J. (1975). The Kenya road transport cost study: Research on Vehicle Operating Costs, Transport and Road Research Laboratory Report LR672, Department of the Environment, Crowthorne.

Kobayashi, K., Do, M.-S. and Han, D.-S. (2010). “Estimation of Markovian transition probabilities for pavement deterioration forecasting.” KSCE J. of Civil Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp.

341-351.

Kobayashi, K., Ejiri, R. and Do, M.-S. (2008). “Pavement manage- ment accounting system.” J. of Infrastructure Systems, ASCE., Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 159-168.

Kobayashi, K., Kaito, K. and Nam, L. T. (2012). “A statistical deterioration forecasting method using hidden Markov model with measurement error.” Transportation Research-Part B, Vol.

46, pp. 544-561.

Korea Institute of Construction Technology (KICT) (2008). A guideline for vehicle classification: 12 types-based, Ministry of Land, Transportation, and Maritime Affair (MLTM) (in Korean) Korea Institute of Construction Technology (KICT) (2009). Final-

report of the national highway pavement management system 2008, Ministry of Land, Transportation, and Maritime Affair (MLTM) (in Korean).

Ministry of Land, Transportation, and Maritime Affair (MLTM) (2011). A guidebook for investment of transportation facilities(4

th

edition), Report ID 2011-655, MLTM (in Korean).

Morosiuk, G. and Abaynayaka, S. W. (1982). Vehicle operating cost in the Caribbean: An Experimental Study of Vehicle Performance, TRRL Laboratory Report 1056. Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne.

Permanent International Association of Road Congresses (PIARC) (2000). Highway development and management series: vol. 1~7, The World Road Association, La Defense.

Statistics Korea (2012). Index title: Current status of total length of

(12)

Korean national highways, A webpage, (available in: http://

www .index.go.kr/egams/stts/jsp/potal/stts/PO_STTS_IdxM ain.jsp?idx_cd=1211&bbs=INDX_001&clas_div=C&rootK ey=1.48.0 ) (in Korean).

Traffic Monitoring System (TMS) (2012). Traffic monitoring system of Korea national highway, A website, (available in: http://www . road.re.kr/ ).

Transportation Research Board (TRB) (2000). Highway Capacity Manual(HCM 2000; 5

th

eds.), TRB, Washington, D.C.

Tsuda, Y., Kaito, K., Aoki, K. and Kobayashi, K. (2006). “Estimating Markovian transition probabilities for bridge deterioration forecasting.” J. of Structural Engineering and Earthquake Engineering, JSCE., Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 241-256.

Uddin, W. and Torres-Verdin, V. (1998). “Service life analysis for managing road pavement in Mexico.” A Proc. of 4

th

International Conference on Managing Pavements, Durban, Vol.2, May 17-21, pp. 882-898.

Watanatada, T. (1981). Highway design and maintenance standards

Transportation, Water and Telecommunications Department Report, the World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Yang, J.-D., Gunaratne, M., Lu, J. J. and Dietrich, B. (2005). “Use

of recurrent Markov chains for modeling the crack performance

of flexible pavements.” J. of Transportation Engineering, ASCE.,

Vol. 131, No. 11, pp. 861-872.

수치

Table 1. A development plan considering the “A Guidebook for Investment of Transportation Facilities (MLTM, 2011)”
Table 2. Comparison of the Korean LCCA model with existing LCCA models
Fig. 1. A flowchart for pavement condition-based life cycle cost analysis modelbbᔾᧁᵝʑእᬊ᮹⧎༊ŝᱶ᮹, ⇵ᱶʑჶᨱᔢݚ⦽₉ᯕෝᅕᯕŁᯩᮝ໑, ݚᩑ⯩᯦ಆᯱഭ᪡ᇥᕾđŝྜྷ᮹⧎༊ŝ⩶┽ࠥᔢᯕ⦹݅
Table 4. Pavement condition rating systems and corresponding pavement deterioration speeds
+3

참조

관련 문서

– Engineering economic analysis focuses on: costs, revenues and benefits that occur at different times.. – When a civil engineer designs a road, a dam, or a building:

Developed by Davis Langdon & Seah Singapore Pte Ltd, 2002, reformatted by Moonseo Park, SNU, 2005... 401.649 Cost Planning for Construction

 Prepare detailed discounted cash flow analysis of capital costs, financing costs, operating expenses, and operating revenues over the life of the service agreement..

• The total estimate cost is approximated $80 million, including $60 million for two barrack facilities and $20 million for green land development such as site earthmoving

Where FPSO substructure costs have been estimated, these have been based on the lightship weight determined and using the same cost basis as the FSO hull. Costs for swivel,

Roles of Computer in Product Develoment Cycle. „ Quick generation

à O r cost form las for operations ignore cost of writing res lts to disk à Our cost formulas for operations ignore cost of writing results to disk à Overall cost = Sum of costs

This study collects and analyzes data on the historical construction cost of steel box girder bridges, identifies key cost impact factors, provides two approximate