Surface-Plasmon Sensors
Seok Ho Song
Physics Department in Hanyang University
Dongho Shin, Jaewoong Yun, Kihyong Choi
Gwansu Lee, Samsung Electro-Mechanics
Dispersion relation of surface plasmons
Sensors based on surface plasmon resonance (SPR) Localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) sensors Surface-plasmon-polaritons waveguide sensors
Contents
Surface plasmons
at dielectric-metal boundaries
Dispersion relation of surface plasmons
2 2
1 )
( ω
ω ω
ε
m= −
pm d x
m d
k c
ω ε ε
ε ε
= +
• Plot of the dielectric constants:
• Plot of the dispersion relation:
d p sp
d m
ω
ω ε
ω ε
ε
= +
≡
∞
→
⇒
−
→
•
1 , k
, When
x
2 2 2 2
) 1
(
) (
p d
d p sp
x
k c
k ε ω ω
ε ω ω ω
− +
= −
=
Surface plasmon dispersion relation:
2 / 1
⎟⎟ ⎠
⎜⎜ ⎞
⎝
⎛
= +
d m
d m
x
c
k ε ε
ε ε ω
ω
ω
pd p
ε ω
+ 1
Re k x
real k
xreal k
zimaginary k
xreal k
zreal k
ximaginary k
zd
ck
xε
Bound modes Radiative modes
Quasi-bound modes
Dielectric:
εd
Metal: εm= εm'+ εm"
x z
(ε'
m> 0)
(−ε
d< ε'
m< 0)
(ε'
m< −ε
d)
2 2 2 2
p c kx
ω
=ω
+Surface plasmon dispersion relation
2 1/ 2 i zi
m d
k c
ε ω
ε ε
⎛ ⎞
= ⎜ ⎝ + ⎟ ⎠
Plasma resonance in summary
Excitation of surface plasmons
Brewster condition?
x
BREWSTER’S ANGLE BREWSTER’S ANGLE
Figure 2.5 Reflection and transmission coefficients as a function of incident angle for air to glass interface.
Brewster angle only for TM pol.
= 0 ; when θ
1+ θ
2= 90
o(Note)
Brewster’s condition is a consequence of impedance matching with reference to the vertical direction Æ
From Snell’s law : n
1sin θ
1= n
2sin θ
2→ η
2sin θ
1= η
1sin θ
2x
x 2
1
η
η = : Brewster’s condition
Åθ1 + θ2= 90o For TM :
No reflection
Does the condition of the surface plasmon resonance match the Brewster’s condition?
Does the condition of the surface plasmon resonance match the Brewster’s condition?
θ
sp= θ
Brewster!!!
x
x 2
1
η
η =
Åθ1 + θ2= 90o
ε
2ε
1θ
1θ
2metal
E E = 0
ε
3θ
31
sin
1 2sin
2,
2sin
2 3sin
3n θ = n θ n θ = n θ
Snell’s law:
2 2
3 2 1
3 3
2
2 3
2 2
1 3
3 3 1
2 2 1 2
3 3 2 2
1 2
sin sin cos
1 sin 1 sin
sin
n n
n n
n
n n
n n n
n n n
n n
θ θ θ
θ θ
θ
= =
⎛ ⎞
= − = − ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
⇒ =
+
( )
( )
2 2
1 2 1 2
3 0 3 2 2
1 2 1 2
3 0 3
sin
sin
spn k n n
c n n c
n k k
ε ε
ω ω
θ ε ε
θ
⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞
= ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ + = ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ +
≡
1 2
1 2
k sp
c
ε ε ω
ε ε
= ⎜ ⎟ ⎛ ⎞ ⎝ ⎠ +
when θ1 + θ2 = 90o
Brewster’s condition Æ Matching of characteristic wave impedance at normal direction
Let’s consider the light propagation in reciprocal direction
Sensors based on surface plasmon resonance (SPR)
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensor
Concept of SPR Biosensing
Re{ } Im{ }
M D
M D
c
ω ε ε
β β β
ε ε
= = +
+
Re{ } β ≅ ⋅ k n k: free-space wavenumber
The propagation constant k of the SPW can be determined by measuring changes in one of these characteristics.
angular modulation intensity modulation
wavelength=682nm Angle of incidence 54
oConcept of SPR Biosensing
• Spatially-filtered, expanded, p-polarized HeNe laser
beam illuminates the gold sample through a prism coupler.
• Reflected light from the
gold surface, containing the SPR image, is monitored with a CCD camera.
• The angle of incidence can be changed by rotating the entire sample assembly.
A.J. Thiel et. al., Anal. Chem. 69 (1997), pp. 4948–4956.
SPR imaging
2D and 3D Images of ssDNA
•Shows the 5 spots of self
assembled thio-oligonucleotide DNA probes immobilized on the gold surface
•Color variation indicates
variation in the thickness of the self assembled monolayer
(SAM)
•R. Rella, et al. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 20 (2004), pp.1140-1148.
(from propagating to localized plasmons)
Localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR)
A novel ultrahigh-resolution surface plasmon resonance biosensor with an Au nanocluster-embedded dielectric film
Biosensors and Bioelectronics 19 (2004) 1465–1471 The detection performance of conventional surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensors is
limited to a 1 pg/mm2surface coverage of biomolecules.
Au nanocluster-enhanced SPR biosensor provides the potential to achieve an ultrahigh-resolution detection performance of approximately 0.1 pg/mm2surface coverage of biomolecules.
Au nanoclusters 4 nm size
6 nm interval
GAS
DNA
Localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR)
Sensing using Nanoshells
Waveguide sensors based on
long-range surface plasmon polaritons (LR-SPPs)
Metal strips guiding surface plasmon polaritons
metal strip
dielectric
thickness ~ 10 nm
surface plasmon-polaritons
frequency
in-plane wavevector
Long-Range SPP:
weak surface confinement, low loss
Short-Range SPP:
strong surface confinement, high loss
Coupling of Surface Plasmon Polaritons
LR-SPP and SR-SPP on thin metal films
Dispersion curves of a metal slab
0 50 100 150 200
1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0
ab sb
β r/k 0
thickness (h : nm)
0 50 100 150 200
10-7 10-6 1x10-5 1x10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1
100 ab
sb
β i/k 0
thickness (h : nm)
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
H y(a.u.)
length (μm)
ab
sb
Field Profile Symmetric Mode
Anti-Symmetric Mode
Real part of Effective index Imaginary part of Effective index
Field profile of slab SPP modes)
-4 -2 0 2 4
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
length (μm)
h=20nm h=40nm h=100nm h=200nm
H y(a.u.)
-4 -2 0 2 4
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
H y(a.u.)
length (μm)
h=20nm h=40nm h=100nm h=200nm
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
h=20nm h=40nm h=100nm h=200nm
H y(a.u.)
length (μm)
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
length (μm)
H y(a.u.)
h=20nm h=40nm h=100nm h=200nm
Symmetric Mode
Anti-Symmetric Mode
Field enhancement at the boundary
Æ Sensitive to environment
Dispersion curves of a finite-width strip
0 50 100 150 200
1.50 1.52 1.54 1.56 1.58 1.60 1.62 1.64
β r/k 0
aabo ssb0
thickness of metal(nm)
0 50 100 150 200
10-7 10-6 1x10-5 1x10-4 10-3 10-2
β i/k 0
aab o
ssb 0
thickness of metal(nm)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
1.500 1.502 1.565 1.570 1.575
slab(20nm) β r/k 0
aab o
ssb0
metal stipe width(μm)
5 10 15 20 25 30
1x10-5 1.3x10-2 1.4x10-2
slab(20nm)
metal stipe width(μm)
aabo ssb
0
β i/k 0
Metal Thickness Metal Stripe width
Long-Range Surface Plasmon Polaritons Waveguide LongLong--Range Surface Plasmon Polaritons WaveguideRange Surface Plasmon Polaritons Waveguide
SiO2 Au
~ 20nm
~ 5um
LR-SPPs W/G Structure
mode SS
0bMode profile of
Best measurements:
- Attenuation: 3.2 dB/cm - Coupling to SMF: < 0.2 dB
LR-SPPs Waveguide Devices
Optical modulator & switch
Sergey I. Bozhevolnyi Group (Denmark)
Optical add/drop filter
Bragg grating filter Pierre Berini Group (Canada) Vertical directional coupler
Seok Ho Song Group (Korea)
optical Sensor ?
LR-SPP waveguides
Long-Range Surface Plasmon Polaritons Waveguide Sensor Long-Long-Range Surface Plasmon Polaritons Waveguide SensorRange Surface Plasmon Polaritons Waveguide Sensor
Metal waveguide
1.330 1.331 1.332 1.333 1.334 1.335 1.336 0
50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Intensity (uW)
Refractive index of water
Reference arm Sensing arm If something is changed
Æ Mode of LR-SPP & output signal is changed
Output signal
- Air or water background - Polarizing waveguide
- Higher waveguide sensitivity - Higher waveguide loss
: Hybrid waveguide structure - Added functionality
: In situ heating or electric field
Metal waveguide sensor Dielectric waveguide sensor
- Air or water background - Non polarizing waveguide - Low waveguide sensitivity - Lower waveguide loss - No added functionality
LR-SPP Waveguide Sensor
Metal waveguide
Reference arm Sensing arm
If something is changed
Æ Mode of LR-SPP is changed
ÆThe output signal (Interferometer signal) is changed
LR-SPP Waveguide Sensor
Region 1 Region 2
Region 1 Cross Section
Region 2 Cross Section
~ 1.47( )
nclad dielectric
em
, d
emε ε
Au, d
Au~ 1.33( ) n
senswater
em
, d
emε ε
Au, d
AuLiquids
(ex. Bio-molecules)
LR-SPP Waveguide on a membrane
1.3305 1.3310 1.3315 1.3320 1.3325 1.3330
20 40 60 80 100 0
1 2 3 4 5 6
thickness of membrane (nm)
Propagation loss (dB/mm)
N eff
2 2
1.55
, 20 , 5
1.33 , 1.45
m Au Au
c em
m
d nm w m
λ μ
ε ε μ
ε ε
=
= = =
= =
Region 2 (sensing region)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 1.3314
1.3315 1.3316 1.3317 1.3318
dem=50nm
N sens
thickness of d
a(nm) εc
em,dem
ε
Au,dAu
ε
, (variable)
a da
ε
1.330 1.332 1.334 1.336 1.338 1.340 1.330
1.332 1.334 1.336 1.338 1.340 1.342
dem=50nm
N sens
index(nc)
1.91 10 /
5 effa
n nm
d
∂
−= ×
∂
Sensitivity of LR-SPP Waveguide Sensor
0.99465
eff c
n n
∂ =
∂
Index change by thermal/density
Index change by thichness
Almost 1 (varialbe)
εc em,dem
ε
Au,dAu
ε
Sensitivity of LR-SPP sensor : an embedded structure
εc em,dem
ε
Au,dAu
ε εa,da(variable)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
1.3328 1.3329 1.3330 1.3331 1.3332
dem=100nm
Effective Index, N eff
Thickness of d
a [nm]
1.92 10 /
5 effa
n nm
d
∂
−= ×
∂
εc em,dem
ε εAu,dAu
, (variable)
a da
ε
4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
1.3386 1.3387 1.3388 1.3389 1.3390 1.3391 1.3392 1.3393
dem=100nm
Effective Index, N sens
Thickness of d
a [nm]
3.6 10 /
5 effa
n nm
d
∂
−= ×
∂
Sensitivity of LR-SPP sensor : embedded thickness
Increase in embedded layer thickness
Reduction of mode size
Increase in E-Field
Stronger interaction
Better sensitivity
SiO2(1.47) Air(1.0) SiO2
water Cross section Cross section
metal 5 mμ
20nm 2
100nm SiO2
1
1000 mμ
In Out
1000 mμ 500 mμ 500 mμ 2000 mμ 500 mμ 500 mμ 1000 mμ 40 mμ
1
2
Intensity modulation from an interferometer
membrane 1
membrane 2 Metal
Receptor
dielectric dielectric substrate
If a detector has 0.1 uW sensitivity, 3 pm thickness variation can be detectable.
If a detector has 0.1 uW sensitivity, 3x10-7 index difference can be detected
0 10 20 30 40 50
0 100 200 300 400 500
Intensity (uW)
Thickness of water (nm)
1.330 1.331 1.332 1.333 1.334 1.335 1.336 0
50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Intensity (uW)
Refractive index of water
Sensitivity
Dielectric/metal Hybrid MZI
1000 mμ
In Out
1000 mμ 1000 mμ 1000 mμ 2000 mμ 1000 mμ 1000 mμ 1000 mμ
Coupling Loss : Fiber-Dielectric WG : ~ 1.26 dB
Insertion Loss : Y-junction : ~ 0.5dB
Coupling Loss : Dielectric WG-Metal WG : ~0.6dB
Propagation Loss of Metal WG : ~ 8.5dB/mm Propagation Loss of Dielectric WG : ~ 0.02dB/mm
10 m5 mμμ
5 mμ
s 1.45 n=
core 1.49 n = 3 mμ
0.4 mμ 50nm
3 mμ
50nm 15nm
1.333 ncl=
em 1.49 n =
s 1.45 n =
h a
λ=780 nm: 5mW
Total Loss : ~ 15 dB
Loss Layer structures
Y-Branch : ~ 3dB
dielectric metal dielectric
Comparison of sensors
Dielectric Au
Sensing Au Surface Sensing layer
Added function
size Optical
loss Sensitivity
Polarizati on Archi- tecture
In situ heating -
Electrical signal transmission -
Integrated Optics (Smaller amount of analyte,
Easy to make array) Integrated Optics
(Smaller amount of analyte, Easy to make array) Bulk optics
(Larger amount of analyte Difficult to make array)
Lowest (MZI) Lower
(MZI possible) High
(ATR required)
Higher Higher
High
TE and TM TM
TM
Dielectric Waveguide MZI LRSP Waveguide MZI
SPR in ATR
angle/wavelength scan in ATR
Metal on high index prism
Metal on membrane waveguide
Dielectric waveguide Phase difference detection in MZI Phase difference detection in MZI
Summary of SP
Summary of SP - - waveguide Sensors waveguide Sensors
z High Sensitivity
- Ability to detect small molecules (e.g. a water monolayer in water) - Determination of concentration, specificity, kinetic parameters
z Label free
z Requires less amount of analyte z Compact size
z Broadly applicable platform
- receptor provide specificity to target analytes - waterly (bio), gas, chemical concentration z Novel technology
z Easy to make array format
z Micro-fluidic flow cell can be integrated
z Potential one chip integration of MZI/LD/PD
Ekmel Ozbay, Science, vol.311, pp.189-193 (13 Jan. 2006).
Some of the challenges that face plasmonics research in the coming years are
(i) demonstrate optical frequency subwavelength metallic wired circuits
with a propagation loss that is comparable to conventional optical waveguides;
(ii) develop highly efficient plasmonic organic and inorganic LEDs with tunable radiation properties;
(iii) achieve active control of plasmonic signals by implementing electro-optic, all-optical, and piezoelectric modulation and gain mechanisms to plasmonic structures;
(iv) demonstrate 2D plasmonic optical components, including lenses and grating couplers, that can couple single mode fiber directly to plasmonic circuits;
(v) develop deep subwavelength plasmonic nanolithography over large surfaces;
(vi) develop highly sensitive plasmonic sensors that can couple to conventional waveguides;
(vii) demonstrate quantum information processing by mesoscopic plasmonics.