• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

œ = kò k @o 0 n É; c 8 ý” X ¢ R X N Ëù m Ç Ti-Cu-Ni ¶  ¥ ?ô £ Œ p §8 ý  ¹ ÅM × D] K ¡X ì Ä ” ¼Å k Ä — ¤V R Ë

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "œ = kò k @o 0 n É; c 8 ý” X ¢ R X N Ëù m Ç Ti-Cu-Ni ¶  ¥ ?ô £ Œ p §8 ý  ¹ ÅM × D] K ¡X ì Ä ” ¼Å k Ä — ¤V R Ë"

Copied!
5
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

Electrochemical Corrosion Behaviors of Amorphous Ti-Cu-Ni Alloys Produced by Using the Quenching Method

Hyun-Goo Kim

Department of Physics Education, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Korea

Hee-Jin Jang

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Korea (Received 8 July 2015 : revised 29 July 2015 : accepted 31 July 2015)

This study was undertaken to examine the electrochemical corrosion properties of amorphous Ti50Cu30Ni20, Ti70Cu10Ni20, and Ti75Cu15Ni10alloys prepared with various alloy composition by using the melt-spinning method. The potentiodynamic polarization showed that the corrosion potential (Ecorr) and the corrosion rate (icorr) of the Ti50Cu30Ni20 and Ti70Cu10Ni20 alloys were -0.078 and -0.082 VSCE and about 2.19 × 10−5 and 1.00 × 10−7 A/cm2, respectively, in a pH 2 solution. The corrosion rate of the Ti70Cu10Ni20alloy was lower than that of the Ti50Cu30Ni20alloy.

This is explained by the fact that the corrosion resistance of the Ti70Cu10Ni20 alloy is primarily dominated by Ti. Also, the Ecorr and the icorr of the Ti70Cu10Ni20 and the Ti75Cu15Ni10 alloys were -0.082 and -0.248 VSCE and about 1.00 × 10−7 and 1.21 × 10−6 A/cm2, respectively. The corrosion resistance of Ti70Cu10Ni20alloy was better than that of the Ti75Cu15Ni10alloy.

PACS numbers: 81.65.Kn

Keywords: Amorphous Ti-Cu-Ni alloys, Corrosion potential, Corrosion current density

u

œ = kò k @o 0 n É; c 8 ý” X ¢ R X N Ëù m Ç Ti-Cu-Ni ¶  ¥ ?ô £ Œ p §8 ý  ¹ ÅM × D] K ¡X ì Ä ” ¼Å k Ä — ¤V R Ë

™ »g ` @¦ 

›

¸‚@/†<Ɠ§ Óüt“o§¹¢¤õ, F gÅÒ 61452

† ç

¡r ) . >

›

¸‚@/†<Ɠ§ F«Ñ/NB†<Æõ, F gÅÒ 61452

(2015¸ 7Z4 8{9 ~ÃÎ6§, 2015¸£  7Z4 29{9 ú&ñ‘:r~ÃÎ6£§, 2015¸ 74 31{Z 9 >FSX‰&ñ)

pH 2“ íߖ$í ú6 xÓo\"f q&ñ|9 Ti50Cu30Ni20, Ti70Cu10Ni20,Õªo“¦ Ti75Cu15Ni10½+ËFK[þt_ „ l

o†<Æ&h ÂÒd” :£¤$í`¦›¸ %i. Ti50Cu30Ni20õ Ti70Cu10Ni20 q&ñ|9 ½ËF+K_ ÂÒd”„0A (Ecorr)H y

Œ

•yŒ• €• -0.078 VSCE, -0.082 VSCE–Ð _ q5pw > 8£¤&÷ñ&%3ܼ 9, ÂÒd”5qภ(icorr)H€• 2.19 × 10−5 A/cm2õ 1.00 × 10−7A/cm2ܼ–Ð Ti70Cu10Ni20½+ËFK i_ corr Ti50Cu30Ni20ËF+½K_ icorr˜Ð 8 ±ú

>

 8£¤&ñ÷&#Q Ni †<Ê|¾Ós {9&½ñ+É âĺ ½+ËFK_ ?/d”$í“Ér Ti†<Ê|¾Ós Z}`¦Ãº2Ÿ¤8 ĺú½+É כ ܼ–Ð ÒqtyŒ•÷&

%

3. ¢¸ôÇ q&ñ|9 Ti70Cu10Ni20½+ËFKõ Ti75Cu15Ni10 ½+ËFK_ EcorrHyŒ•yŒ• €• -0.082 VSCEü< -0.248 VSCE–Ð Ti70Cu10Ni20 ËF+½Ks 8 Z}> 8¤&£ñ÷&%3ܼ 9, icorrH €• 1.00 × 10−7 A/cm2õ 1.21 × 10−6

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

(2)

A/cm ܼ–Ð Ti70Cu10Ni20ËF+½K_ icorr Ti75Cu15Ni10ËF+½K_ icorr˜Ð 8 ±ú ÂÒd” $†½Ó$ís 8 ĺ Ã

º½+É כ ܼ–Ð ÒqtyŒ•÷&%3.

PACS numbers: 81.65.Kn

Keywords:q&ñ|9 Ti-Cu-Ni ½+ËFK,ÂÒd”0A, ÂÒd”5Åq•¸

I. " e  ] Ø

q

&ñ|9 FK5Åq½+ËFK“Ér r FÉK5Åq½+ËFK q\ #Œ ╸, y©œ

•

¸, ÂÒd”$†½Ó 1px_ :£¤$ís ĺú #Œ “¦y©œ•¸ F«Ñ, $íF

«

Ñ, %i†<Æ|¾Ó >8£¤ F«Ñ, q¨î+þA &ñ ½¨›¸F«Ñ 1px\"f z´ 6

 

xo÷&l rŒ• %i [1]. :£¤y Ti ½+ËFK“ÉrÁº>q\ @/ôÇ y

©œ•¸ü< ?/½¨$ís Z}“¦, $í+þA$í, Òqt^‰&h½+Ë$í, Õªo“¦ ÂÒd”

$

†½Ó$í 1pxs a%~l M:ëH\ 1lx ü< †½Ó/NB ĺÅÒ íߖ\O, 



\"f_ #ŒQt lÕüt&h 6x6£ x,Õªo“¦ uõ F«Ñ ]jŒ• 1

p

x\ ÅÒ Ä»6 x  [2–8].

Õ

ªQ #ŒQ ìr\"f pA+þA 'é‘ß–™èF–Ð"f yŒ•F g~ÃΓ¦ e”

H q&ñ| F9K5Åq`¦V,o s6 x l 0AK"fHÕª ?/½¨$í

`

¦&ñ HÂÒd” $†½Ó$í\ @/ôÇ ƒ½¨ €9ú&hs 9, {9 ì

øÍ&hܼ–Ð q5pwÇ ›ô¸$í\"f q&|ñ9 FK5Åq½+ËFK“Ér&ñ½+ËFK

˜

Ð 8 Z}“Ér ÂÒd$”†½Ó`¦ ˜Ð“ [9–13]. Akiyama [14]

1 p

x“Ér d.c. magnetron sputtering ZO\ _K ]jŒ•)aq&ñ

|9

 Ni-Ti ½+ËFK_ „lo†<Æ& ÂhÒd” :£¤$í`¦ 1 M HCl 6 xӐo 5

Å

q\"f ƒ½¨ %iܼ 9, Rondelli 1px [15]“Ér Ni-Ti +þA©œ l

%

3 ½+ËFK_ ²DGÂÒ&h“ ÂÒd”$†½Ó$í\ @/ôÇ Cu_ %ò†¾Ó`¦ƒ

½

¨ %i. Hsua 1px [16]“Érl>&h ½ËF+K~½ÓZOܼ–Ð ]jŒ•)a Ti ìløÍ FK5ÅqËF½+K (Ti50Cu28Ni15Sn7)_ ÂÒd” :£¤$í`¦ƒ

½

¨Ùþ¡. ÕªQ ‰&³F q&ñ|9 ½ËF+K_ >hµ1Ï, 6£x6 x x9 ÂÒd” :

£¤$í\ ›'aÇ ƒô ½¨H p²DG, {‘9:r 1px`¦ q2©ŸôÇ {9ÂÒ ‚”

² D

G\"f Åҕ¸ “¦ e”ܼ 9 ²DG?/\"fHsü< °ú “ÉrÂÒd” :£¤

\›'aôÇ ƒ½¨Ö¸1xls pf¨ôÇ z´&ñs.

‘

:r ƒ½¨\"fH Ӑo^‰/LÍå‰tZO\ _K ]jŒ•)a Ti50Cu30Ni20, Ti70Cu10Ni20, Õªo“¦ Ti75Cu15Ni10

½

+ËFKr«Ñ[þt`¦ X-‚  r]X z´+«> (X-Ray Diffractometry, XRD)`¦ :ŸxK o‘:r r«Ñ_ q&ñ|9 ©œI\¦ ›¸ %i“¦,

„

lo†<Æ&h ìrFGz´+«>`¦ :xŸK ½+ËFK_ ›¸$í\ Ér r«Ñ _

 ?/d”$í`¦“q§ ŽžÐ %i.

II. ÷ m Ç] M ö U ê s0 n É

‘

:r z´+«>\ 6 x)aq&ñ|9 FK5Åq“Ér íH•¸ 99.9% s©œ“ Ti, Cu, Õªo“¦ Ni`¦ "é¶qÖ¦ (at.%)–Ð Ti50Cu30Ni20, Ti70Cu10Ni20, Õªo“¦ Ti75Cu15Ni10 s ÷&•¸2Ÿ¤ ™D¥½+ËôÇ

E-mail: [email protected]

Ê

ê, “¦ÅÒ  Ä»•¸\P\ _K ArÛ¼ ìr0Al \"f 6 xK

#Œ —¸½+ËFK`¦ ëߖ[þt%3. s —¸½+ËFK_ ³ð€\ p > +þ

A$í)a íߖo}Œ•`¦ °ú˜"f ]jôÇ +' &h{©œôÇ ß¼l–Ð L:

“

¦, s\¦$3%ò ”¸a¦\ V,#Q ”/BNéߖ{9 –ÐÖ¦Q Ӑo^‰ /åL͉t



©œu\¦ 6x  #Œ o‘:r+þAܼ–Ð ]jŒ• %i. ]jŒ•)a r«Ñ _

 &ño ©œI\¦¸› l 0A #Œ X-‚ r]Xl (X-ray diffratometry, XRD, Rigaku Co. D/Max 3A, CuKα)\¦



6 x %i.

„

lo†<Æ ìrFGz´+«>“Ér É(ŽÓ'ü< ƒ)a Gamry_ CMS (Corrosion Measurement System)100`¦ s6 x #Œ Ã

º'Ÿ %iHX< r¼#`¦ •\ŒO„FGܼ–Ð, Ÿíoºú˜–Ðësq (Satu- rated Calomel Electrode, SCE) „FG`¦ lïr„FGܼ–Ð, Õ

ªo“¦ “¦x9•¸ òøÍ™è„FG`¦ ˘¸„FGܼ–Ð ôÇ 3„FG „ l

o†<Æ !sq`¦ s6 x %i. r¼#_ ³ð€&h“Ér 0.1 cm2

•

¸ ÷&•¸2Ÿ¤ Û¼(ç _…sáԖРx4Ÿ¤ %i“¦, r¼#_ „ l

 ]X8ú¤`¦ 0A #Œ silver paste\¦ s6 x #Œ ½¨o‚õ ]X

½

+Ë %i. „K|9 6 xӐoܼ–ЍH H3BO3, H3C6H5O7H2O, Na3PO412H2O\¦ ™D¥½+Ë #Œ ]j›¸ôÇ 25 C_ pH 2 ¢-aØæ 6

 xӐo [17]`¦6 x #Œ íߖ$í 6 xӐo\"f_ ?/d$”í`¦¨î 

%

i. 6 xӐo?/_ íߖ™è\¦ ]j l 0AK “¦íH•¸ N2 Û¼

\

¦ z´+«> r• 20ìŒ r„ÂÒ' Ä»{ 9%iܼ 9, z´+> «H 1lxîߖ

\

 „K|9 6 xӐo ³ð€ 0A\ N2 Û¼\¦ >5Åq&hܼ–Ð Ä»{9 r

(. -1 VSCE\"f 5ìrçߖ 6£§FG¨8Š"é¶`¦ z´r “¦ 30ìr 1

l

xîߖ >h~½Ór–Є0A (open circuit potential) îߖ&ñ÷&•¸ 2

Ÿ

¤@/lôÇ Êê >h~½Ór–Є0A–ÐÂÒ' 0.3 V ±ú“Ér„0A–ÐÂÒ '

 0.001 V/s_ 5Åq•¸–Ð „0A\¦ œ5©pxrv€"f „ÀÓx9•¸

\

¦ 8£¤&ñ %i. pH 2\"f 8£¤&ñ)a½+ËFK_ ìrFG/BG‚ܼ–Ð Â

Ò' Ecorrü< icorr\¦½¨ #Œ Ti, Cu, Ni íHFK5Åq&ñ|9 r

«

Ñ_ ìrFG/BG‚õ q“§ %iܼ 9, ½+ËFK ›¸$ís Ti-Cu-Ni q

&ñ|9 ½+ËFK_ ÂÒd”\ puH%ò†¾Ó`¦ ìr$3 %i.

III. + s ÇÊ Ý õ m Í w в  o

Fig. 1“Ér melt-spinningZO`¦ 6 x #Œ ]jŒ•)a Ti50Cu30Ni20, Ti70Cu10Ni20, Õªo“¦ Ti75Cu15Ni10

½

+ËFK[þt_ XRD Û¼&7˜àÔ!3s. —¸ŽH Û¼&7˜àÔ!3\"f :£¤

&

ñôÇ xß¼H a'›¹1Ï÷&t ·ú§€Œ¤Ü¼ 9 —¸ŽH r«Ñ[þts q&ñ|9



©œIe”`¦ ^¦ ú e”%3. ëߖ Ti70Cu10Ni20 ½+ËFK_ ¢-a ë

ߖôÇ q&ñ|9 xß¼H • 2θ = 40.8€ ÂÒH\"f +þA$í÷&#Q

(3)

Fig. 1. (Color online) X-ray patterns of amorphous (a) Ti50Cu30Ni20, (b) Ti70Cu10Ni20, and Ti75Cu15Ni10 al- loys.

Ti50Cu30Ni20 r«Ñ Ti75Cu15Ni10 ½+ËFKr«Ñ_ q&ñ|9 x

ß¼˜Ð ›¸FK H• AyŒá¤\ +þA$í÷&%36£§`¦˜ ÷úº e”%3.

Fig. 2H q&ñ|9 Ti50Cu30Ni20, Ti70Cu10Ni20, Ti75Cu15Ni10 ½+ËFK[þt\ @/K 0.001 V/s_ 5Åq•¸–Ð „0A

\

¦ ©œ5pxrv€"f 8£¤&ñôÇ ìrFG/BG‚`¦  ·p ÕªaË>s.

[

j ½+ËFK_ EcorrH -0.25 ∼ 0 VSCE ½¨çߖܼ–Ð ˜Ð%i. [j

½

+ËFK—¸¿º „0A ©œ5pxÊ\<†  „ÀÓ 7£x %i. Õª



Q [j ½+ËFK ׿©œ ÂÒd”„0A ±ú“Ér Ti70Cu15Ni10½+Ë F

K_ âĺ\H ÂÒd”„0A–ÐÂÒ' -0.05 VSCE &ñ•¸tH

„

0A 7£x\ Ér À„Óx9•¸ 7£x Bĺ Ö¼o“¦ -0.05 VSCE s©œ_ „0A ½¨çߖ\"fH„ÀÓx9•¸ /åLy 7£x

H1lx`¦˜Ð%i. "f ÂÒd”„0A (-0.25 VSCE)–ÐÂÒ '

 €• -0.05 VSCEt ÂÒ1lxI ½¨çߖ (]j 1 ÂÒ1lxI ½¨çߖ)

“

 כ ܼ–Ð óøÍéߖ)a. Ti50Cu20Ni30, Ti75Cu10Ni20 ½+ËFK _

 âĺ\H ÂÒd”„0A -0.05 VSCE\ 0>"f s ÂÒ

Fig. 2. (Color online) Polarization curves of the amor- phous Ti50Cu30Ni20 and Ti70Cu10Ni20 alloys in pH 2 buffer solution.

1 l

xI ½¨çߖs ¸ú˜  t ·ú§H כ ܼ–Ð ˜Ð“. [j ½+ËFK _

 „ÀÓx9•¸H 0 VSCE ?/ü@_ „0A\"f /åLy 7£xôÇ s

Êê, €• 0.5 VSCE H~½Ó\"f r „0A ©œ5px\ Ér „ À

Óx9•¸_ 7£x 5Åq•¸ & h yŒ™™è #Œ 1.5 VSCE s©œ t

 €• 10−4 A/cm2 ?/ü@_ °úכ`¦Ä»t %i“¦, s ½¨çߖ`¦ ]

j2_ ÂÒ1lxI ½¨çߖs“¦ ^¦Ãº e”’x.

Kimõ Jang [18]_ 7HëH\"f ƒ/LÙåþ¡1pws ½+ËFK_ ÂÒ1lx I

o\¦ 0px > H ½+ËFK"鶙èH ©œ@/&hܼ–Ð ±ú“Ér „ 0

A\"fÂÒ' ÂÒ1lxIo÷&H Ti{ 9 כ ܼ–Ð ÒqtyŒ•)a. ÕªQ



 Ti_ ÂÒ1lxIo ↾Ó\•¸ Ô¦½¨ “¦ Ni_ ÂÒ1lxIo „ 0

A˜Ð ±ú“Ér „0A %ò%i (€• 0 VSCE s )\"fH Cuü<

Ni_ Ö¸$ío 6 xK d” > {9#QÙ¼–Ð Fig. 2ü< °ú s

−0.05 VSCE H~½Ó\"f „ÀÓx•9¸ ØÔ> 7£x H כ Ü

¼–Ð [O"î½+É Ãº e”. ÕªQ Niõ Cu_ †<Ê|¾Ós ±ú“Ér½+Ë F

K_ âĺ\H s[þt "鶙è_ Ö¸$ío 6 xK ©œ@/&hܼ–Ð

€



• Ù¼–Ð Niõ Cu_ †<Ê|¾Ó ½+Ës ©œ ±ú“¦ Ti_ †<Ê|¾Ós Z

}“Ér Ti75Cu15Ni10½+ËFK\"fë– aß%v“Ér]j 1 ÂÒ1lxI %ò%is

›'

a¹1Ï÷&H Üכ¼–Ð ÒqtyŒ•a). Ni_ ÂÒ1lxIo rŒ•÷&H

„

0A“ 0 VSCE s©œ (Fig. 3)\"fH[j t ½+ËFKs —¸¿º Tiõ Ni_ %ò†¾Óܼ–Ð #QÖ¼ &•ñ¸ ÂÒ1lxIo 0px  ÂÒ 1

l

xI x}Œ•_ îߖ&ñ$í“Ér Z}t ·ú§ q“§&h Z}“rÉÂÒ1lxI „ À

Óx9•¸ (1 × 10−4 A/cm2?/ü@)\¦ú°Hכ ܼ–Ð ˜Ð“.

Fig. 4H Fig. 2_ ìrFG/BG‚\"f 8£¤&ñôÇ Ecorrü< icorr\¦

•

¸rôÇ כ s. Fig. 4(a)\  ·p ü< °ú s q&ñ|9 Ti50Cu30Ni20õ Ti70Cu10Ni20 ËF+½K_ EcorrH yŒ•yŒ• €•

−0.078 VSCE, -0.082 VSCE–Ð _ q5pw > 8£¤&ñ÷&%3“¦, Ti75Cu15Ni10 ½+ËFK_ Ecorrr -0.248 V“É SCE–Ð Ér ¿º ½+Ë F

K˜Ð €•çߖ ±ú€Œ¤. [j ½+ËFK_ icorrH Ti50Cu30Ni20½+ËFK s

 2.19 × 10−5A/cm2, Ti75Cu15Ni10½+ËFKs 1.21 × 10−7

(4)

Fig. 3. Polarization curves of pure Ti, Cu, and Ni in pH 2 buffer solution.

A/cm2, Ti70Cu10Ni20 ËF+½Ks 1.00 × 10−7 A/cm2ܼ–Ð Ti75Cu15Ni10, Ti70Cu10Ni20ËF½+K_ icorr Ti50Cu30Ni20

½

+ËFK_ icorr˜Ð s`› ±ú€Œ¤ (Fig. 4(b)). Ti75Cu15Ni10

x9

Ti70Cu10Ni20 ½+ËFK_ icorr Ti50Cu30Ni20 ½+ËFK˜Ð



8 ±ú“Érכ “Ér Ecorrs©œ\"f¸$Öío xß¼ \Os Bĺ Z}“Ér

„

0At ±ú“Ér À„Óx9•¸\¦ Ä»t  9 îߖ&ñ)a ÂÒ1lxI  1

l

x`¦˜Ð“ Ti_ %ò†¾Ó\ l“ôÇ כ ܼ–Ð ÆÒ&ñ)a (Fig. 3).



"f Ni_ †<Ê|¾Ós 20%–Ð {9&ôñÇ ½+ËFK_ âĺ\H Ti

†

<Ê|¾Ós Z}“ÉrËF½+K_ ?/d”$ís Z41pxy ĺúôÇ כ ܼ–Ð Òqt y

Œ

•)a. Ti_ †<Ê|¾Ós 70 ∼ 75%“ ¿ º ½+ËFK_ icorr“Ér q 5

p

wôÇ Ãºïrs, ÂÒ1lxI :£¤$ 8í £¤€\"fHÂÒd”„0ASX‰ z

´ > ÂÒ1lxI ½¨çߖ ?/\ 0Au H Ti75Cu15Ni10 ½+ËFK s

 ›¸FK 8 îߖ&&ñh“ ?/d” 1lx`¦ è­q ú e”`¦כ ܼ

–

Ð ÆÒ&ñ)a.

q

&ñ|9 Ti70Cu10Ni20 ËF+½Kõ Ti75Cu15Ni10 ½+ËFK _

 EcorrH yŒ•y• €Œ • -0.082 VSCEü< -0.248 VSCE–Ð Ti70Cu10Ni20 ½+ËFKs 8 Z}> 8£¤&ñ÷&%3ܼ 9 (a), icorrH

€



• 1.00 × 10−7 A/cm2 õ 1.21×10−7 A/cm2 ܼ–Ð Ti70Cu10Ni20½+ËFK_ icorr Ti75Cu15Ni10½+ËFK_ icorr˜Ð



 8 ±ú> 8£¤&ñ÷&#Q ÂÒd” $†½Ó$ís 8 ĺú½+É כ ܼ–Ð Òq

tyŒ•÷&%3 (b). Ti70Cu10Ni20 ËF+½K_ ÂÒd” $†½Ó$ís Ti75Cu15Ni10 ½+ËFK˜Ð 8 a~“%Ér כ “Ér Fig. 3\"f ^¦ ú e”

1pws q“§& ±h ú“Ér„0A %ò%i\"fH Ni sÉr 5Åq•¸–Ð Â

Òd”÷& HÖ¸$ío xß¼\¦ ·p +' ÂÒ1lxIo÷&#Q €• 1 VSCEt ÂÒ1lxI ©œI\¦ Ä»t Ù¼–Ð, ÂÒd”„0A s©œ

\

"f /åLy íߖo ”'Ÿ÷&H Cu ˜ÐHÂÒ1lxI x}Œ•_ +þ

A$í\ s`› a~“%Ér%ò†¾Ó`¦zul M:ëH“  Üכ¼–Ð ÒqtyŒ•)a



.

Fig. 4. (a) Corrosion potentials and (b) corrosion rates for Ti50Cu30Ni20, Ti70Cu10Ni20, and Ti75Cu15Ni10 al- loys in pH 2 buffer solution.

IV. + s Ç Â ] Ø

pH 2“ íߖ$í 6 xӐo\"f q&ñ|9 Ti50Cu30Ni20, Ti70Cu10Ni20,Õªo“¦ Ti75Cu15Ni10 ½+ËFK[þt_ „lo†<Æ

&

h ÂÒd” :£¤$í`¦©œ@/&Üh¼–Ð q“§ %i. Ti50Cu30Ni20õ Ti70Cu10Ni20 q&ñ|9 ½+ËFK_ EcorrH yŒ•yŒ• €• -0.078 VSCE, -0.082 VSCE–Ð _ q5pw% iܼ 9, icorrH€• 2.19

× 10−5 A/cm2õ 1.00×10−7 A/cm2ܼ–Ð Ti70Cu10Ni20

½

+ËFK_ icorr Ti50Cu30Ni20 ËF+½K_ icorr˜Ð 8 ±ú Ni20ܼ–Ð {9&ñ½+É âĺ Ti†<Ê|Ós¾ Z}`¦Ãº2¤Ÿ ?/d”$ís 8 Ä

ºÃº½+É כ ܼ–Ð ÒqtyŒ•÷&%3. ¢¸ôÇ q&ñ|9 Ti70Cu10Ni20

½

+ËFKõ Ti75Cu15Ni10 ½+ËFK_ EcorrH yŒ•yŒ• €• -0.082 VSCEü< -0.248 VSCE–Ð Ti70Cu10Ni20 ½+ËFKs 8 Z}

>

 8¤&£ñ÷&%3ܼ 9, icorrH €• 1.00 × 10−7 A/cm2 õ 1.21 × 10−6 A/cm2 ܼ–Ð Ti70Cu10Ni20 ½+ËFK_ icorr Ti75Cu15Ni10½+ËFK_ icorr˜Ð 8 ±ú ÂÒd” $†½Ó$ís 8 Ä

ºÃº½+É כ ܼ–Ð ÒqtyŒ•÷&%3.

(5)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by research fund from Chosun University, 2015.

REFERENCES

[1] F. E. Luborsky, Amorphous Metallic Alloys (But- terworths, London, 1983).

[2] G. Lutjering and J. C. Williams, Titanium, 2nd ed.

(Springer, 2007).

[3] M. Long and H. J. Rack, Biomaterials 19, 1621 (1998).

[4] F. Zhang, S. Chen, L. Dong, Y. Lei and T. Liu et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 257, 2587 (2011).

[5] T. Okabe and H. Hero, Cell Mater. 5, 211 (1995).

[6] Y. Takada, O. Okuno, H. Nakajima and T. Okabe, J. Dent. Res. 76, 402 (1997).

[7] T. Okabe, C. Ohkubo, I. Watanabe, O. Okuno and Y. Takada, JOM 50, 24 (1998).

[8] M. Kikuchi, Y. Takada, S. Kiyosue, M. Yoda and M. Woldu et al., Dent. Mater. 19, 174 (2003).

[9] H. X. Li and S. Yi, Mater. Chem. Phys. 112, 305 (2008).

[10] W. Xueqing and X. Changqing, J. Rare Earths 26, 745 (2008).

[11] H.-J. Lee, E. Akiyama, H. Habazaki, A. Kawashima and K. Asami et al., Corros. Sci. 38, 1269 (1996).

[12] C. A. C. Souza, S. E. Kuri, F. S. Politti, J. E. May and C. S. Kiminami, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 247, 69 (1999).

[13] A. M. Lucente and J. R. Scully, Corros. Sci. 49, 2351 (2007).

[14] E. Akiyama, H. Habazaki, A. Kawashima, K. Asami and K. Hashimoto, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 181-182, 1128 (1994).

[15] G. Rondelli and B. Vicentini, Biomaterials 23, 639 (2002).

[16] C. F. Hsua, W. Kaia, H. M. Linb, C. K. Linc and P.

Y. Leea, J. Alloys Compd. 504S, S176 (2010).

[17] J. Ballinger and G. Shugar, Chemical Technician’s Ready Reference Handbook (McGraw Hill Profes- sional, New York, 2011).

[18] H. G. Kim and H. J. Jang, New Phys.: Sae Mulli 64, 600 (2014).

수치

Fig. 2. (Color online) Polarization curves of the amor- amor-phous Ti 50 Cu 30 Ni 20 and Ti 70 Cu 10 Ni 20 alloys in pH 2 buffer solution
Fig. 3. Polarization curves of pure Ti, Cu, and Ni in pH 2 buffer solution. A/cm 2 , Ti 70 Cu 10 Ni 20 ½+ ËFK s  1.00 × 10 −7 A/cm 2 Ü ¼–Ð Ti 75 Cu 15 Ni 10 , Ti 70 Cu 10 Ni 20 ½+ ËFK _  i corr  Ti 50 Cu 30 Ni 20 ½+ ËFK _  i corr ˜ Ð   s `›  ± ú 

참조

관련 문서

The neutron beam distribution at the zero an- gle and reflection position of the vertical type neutron reflectometer,  : calculated beam distribution at the zero angle position ; •

This paper presents the results obtained from glow discharge optical emission spectrometry (GD- OES) depth profiling of Cu(In, Ga)Se 2 (CIGS) thin films prepared at various

The interactions between an electric field and various conductor and dielectric materials were investigated in terms of the shifts in the resonant frequency, the changes in the

Division of Energy Systems Research, NT·IT Fusion Technology Institute, Ajou University, Suwon 443-749 (Received 8 April 2008).. The optical properties of

The structural and the electrical properties were investigated using high-resolution X-ray diffractometer (HRXRD) and temperature-dependent Hall effect measurements.. The high-

Real and imaginary parts of dielectric constant measured with the heating rate of 2 ◦ C/min during the crystallization of amorphous KNbGeO 5 .... Fujiwara

PZT thin-film capacitors showed well-saturated P-E hysteresis curves, while the remanent polarization, as well as the polarization loss after switching repetitions, depended on

The effect of an In x Ga 1 −x As (x = 0.1, 0.2) asymmetric strain release layer (ASRL) on top of InAs/GaAs qunatum dots (QDs) prepared by using the atomic layer epitaxy(ALE) method