(1)Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2003, Vol
8
0
0
전체 글
(2) *. (2002. 8. 29 ). A Study on the Effect of Science Achievement Faculties Improvements in High School Inquiry Chemistry Experiments Choonpyo Hong* and Yongyeon Kim Department of Chemistry Education, Kongju National University, Kongju 314-701, Korea Received August 29, 2002). . .
(3) ! " #$% &', . (), * , % (), ! () +, -&./0. " 1 2 34 56 27 57- 1508 9: .; #$% &', () <=>?@ ! () A>?, * , % () BC >?" .; DE" F./0.
(4) G ., !() * , % ()H IJ%9: KL MH N9: -&OP9Q ! () RS T QU< +, V WT A/0. XT <Y%9: Z[ \ ]D ? ^ _ `P0.. : , ,
(5) , ,
(6) ABSTRACT. In this study, the effects of science achievement faculties improvements upon students' logical thinking, science inquiry skills, experiment attitudes, manipulated skills and inquiry process skills were investigated in high school inquiry chemistry experiments. For this purpose, the participants were 150 students taking the course of high school chemistry class in Anyang-city. Logical thinking and science inquiry skills’ data were collected from written tests, inquiry process skills’ data were collected from reports and experiment attitudes and manipulated skills’ data were collected from classroom observations. As the results of this study, students’ inquiry process skills, experiment attitudes and manipulative skills were very low. But other parts except inquiry process skills were significantly increased. And the science achievement of students were improved when continuously inquiry chemistry experiment were applied to students. Keywords: Science Achievement Faculty, Manipulated Skills, Experiment Attitude, Inquiry Process Skills, Inquiry Chmistry Expreiments. . ; ()< => ' :;*+9 , ?@ ;A 6' BC, D /" . E.
(7) . . F+ GHI J' 0K*+9 , L M. ! "# $ % &' ()*+. N . OP QR' /ST . ,, , - . 3/0 12 %+ 34. +9 . 3/0 OP*+ UV ! J4.2. ! 54.1 65 78+9 Abruscato' :. W5 X< Y% Z [ \C ]^ 487.
(8) . 488. 9' _6` ab 7 :c ‘0d. J u kK< _± !, !9 5 / Ã. de) fg hW i< jk Jl fgm. < ‘_K ² /"",
(9) "Ä ²
(10) Å` !. n J' o pq< rd%s54’' pq< =. ±, ÆÇ, ÆÈÉ ² Æ ¯, /"³Ê ² ¸D. > ! J*$, t Z ab u. Ë,
(11) /’ . 6Ä+ ]vH _m ½4.7. pq< 0K ()*+ ]v! w< . 9' !.a ÌÍ< *+ 10?. x2 y z*+ " h { m
(12) . )|_ 5
(13) a9 x2
(14) ,. { c |` z}t ~! o 0. D x2 Î< Ï, q ! µ Î 5 o. dde) OP< *+ . c t ÐC !{, . . , ‘0K*+9 ’ . ! J4.3-4. uW] W5 ab 9 ab z} ! _0 % t U a 9 o { < Z5
(15) o< _. ‘:;*+9 ’,
(16) ‘/ST +9 ’ . Ñ 9 a U¯ ½4. . Robinson, Tamir ., Comber .,. + m 0 ! J!, 5 5 p0 ~ . Ben-Zvi ., Baxter ., Al Busaidi ., Greig . .
(17) *+ uS!, m '
(18) U .
(19) / 5 e{ 0y / 5 e{.
(20) . 4! ! ! J*$, i / _. ' TTÄ/ 4' / Ò reRÓ4.10-16. *+ 0R' [ \C ]^ 9 _6` ab. Baxter . ¸ , TÔ !9 ~. 3 26 !.a w . OP 5
(21) /L 0y/ TTÄ' 0.46. I. II a9 pq 3()
(22) pq . *+ %RH Ñ 9
(23) /L 0y. o { c +9 .. // 9+ 4Õ Ñ< / ! J4! ¡¢ J4.14. c < H&
(24). 65, APUt w 9 « *+ ' pq<. Z pq*+ RH J4' 4.5 65 W. /¢ Ö 0y³ L
(25) / 5. 5
(26) 5 /' 78*+ abz} <. ¸/ 4Õ *+ ] ×4.17b. ~! GHI T! Q5 /^! ¡¢ . Meng Doran 0y/' , qHL « i. J*£+, o 0 t / Z 9'. pq 5 0K / ' Å ], 0K Øq{.
(27) o /t w 9 o 0K 5 . / ' Å 4!. ¤¥ ¦§^ { . ¨!G. Ô 5 // 0K Øq < /. /RH 54.6-7 uW] ©ª % . 'Ù Å 4!. ½4.18 uC!
(28) /] T. ½4. Ú^9 Greig .
(29) . _ a 9' L «
(30) o // _. / 9' o/ ÛÛ+
(31) < ÄÜde ! ¸. + GH00 ! J4! !R! J*$ 65 . t 0¥ 0y/' 4Õ Ý e5
(32).
(33) o /
(34) ¬ |*+ me ! J*. ÄÜ], ¸, ¸D< / £+ 0y/L
(35) . $,
(36) 5 /' ®. /+ Ñ5 o { ' ÞN5 `t. 0 '4! !. R! J4.5 ab/ e5 !.a ab U¯. h o /' 0y /L
(37) // ~ GHI 54! ½4.16. °M:± ² ³´_ 9' !.a o. ©¶ . \ß ., Y2B . Úà. 0() 5 "%t w
(38) 0,
(39) /. 0¹ ÞN5 TTÄ/ J*. . 9 2µ5 _< 0 ! J4.8 ©¶ .. $, 0¹ á< { ' á. !.a
(40) 9
(41) o
(42) / 5. ¦°4! ¡¢ J4.19-21 âãL Tobin . . % 9
(43) // _ + GH00 ! J. ¸ Úà 0¹ Oc< ¹. *$,
(44) /t
(45) 5 // ¦·. 4.23 Tobin . 0¹ T.
(46) ¸¥< / ' kK ¹< ºH]0 ». Ä/ r=0.6ä< å!, kK %æ g 0 ». ! J¼< 0 ½4.9 ¾ _< ¿À Z. 5 o/ w < o ' . ÁÂ'
(47) !9 9 < Y%¢. Q5 H&ç J*$, kK ! ÐC' Journal of the Korean Chemical Society.
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52) . 489. ½4.23 F. control group pretest, midtermtest and posttest design). B . GALTL TIPSét q h ÐC !{. + u(R1) )|5 10? _ a9 . TTÄt % ½'Ù, x. 5 üw
(53) < e 9 x³L ¬³t. o Oc< è J4!. Ì< *+ 5 FB . 9' TÄ. m ½*$, u(R2) 5? _ a9 . / 0.65(p<0.01)+ ] ] a á TTÄ J. 5 üw
(54) < e ! x³t 5 4¼ 5?. ¼< åê4.24 Jacobson Doran Në 5ì 9.
(55) < e ! ¬³t. ì ÌÍ x Ò ÌÍ
(56) 5 í
(57) < /. u(R3) )|5 10? _
(58) <. 0! J '. ½*], Àî5 U¯, . ¯, "# . ï. 0 »54! åê4. uC!
(59) <. e 9 x³L ¬³t. ½4. 65,. ½*$ (R4). L 4
(60) u(R5) )| _ 5`m Dx2 . ' ¤¥ ¦§^,
(61) < ¯, U¯, "# ' !`. Î ¬ x³t m5 4¼ µµ 5? _ . B o ð Ò m ñ{< ò .
(62) a9 5 üw
(63) < e ! . 54!. ¬³t m ½4.. ½4.25. ÁÂ'
(64) !9 9 /¢ J' . Ú^9 9' µ u
(65) S ü ). < 6Ä+ _m !, T5 |ó /. 8Ç 9 µ
(66) qx ¬ u . T ôt _± ½4.7 ÁÂ/ _m5 . `/ ] < z}+
(67) ¸t a. 6Ä' ‘_K ² /"" õ
(68) "Ä õ. dU¯ ½4.. ÆÇ õ ÆÈÉ ² Æ ¯ õ ¸DË õ . . 9 ÌÍ ÐC. /’4. ÁÂ |ó / T ô. !{, {, , , . t *+ YÂ27 . ?f5 0c |ó. . c t a U¯ Z .
(69) ö+u÷ x 9 5?
(70) _ 5 .
(71) q5
(72) Æ+' YÂ27 . ?f5. !9 / ´ /Ã< ?f ½4. øùO. |ó
(73) 9 pq x ‘
(74) 1. 7. SISS 9 q5
(75) ³ ú< d.
(76) %æ ’ . 10?
(77) _. û5 3/0 _
(78) < q h É
(79) kK*. t r h !.a l ½*$, a. 26. + e h t !9 /5 ¸, 0¹ f. q5
(80) Æ+' ‘B 1. q ’ .. g> Ú^ ü´ L. Z .
(81) )|5 10? _ 5 Dx2 . ÄÜ, e, ýD / ~ wÄ*+ ÞN. Î< °e ' u _6` ab !.a . 5 c <. w a9 7, I a9 11, IIa9. ' *+ ] ×4.28. 8 9 ‘
(82) 1. x’ . )| _ a9.
(83) .
(84) < r h µ u+
(85) ² Î< e5 ¬ ¸t u*+ ]vH adU¯ ½4. . . ' Áþ !.a 2?a 2ì x.
(86) pq a m
(87) < w5 ‘TÔ ² . h, µ a. Ä’,
(88) yE5 D 0K< o l. 9 ó 25#, ÿ() ó 50# 75# 150#. üg ' ‘?@ ÏÄ’, o ÛÛ+
(89) < w . ó ÿ() ó ÌÍ< *+. Ó*$, Í< !.a Ï , IQ, w(1. _t ¸ ' ‘?@ Øq ² /Ä’ 3Ä+. ì) , { ³(TSIS), ÐC !{ ³. RÓ! , , oz}. (GALT) . ü ³t w µ u 30#, 5? u. !9 /L TÔ/t µ /úz l. *+ U !, 4m u p 9 3#< 1%+. h. ¶e ½4. 65, µ
(90) \r 2mq*. 10?%t 5 u*+ ! 5 )±
(91) ó . + q (
(92) 9' 4mq, 2`m U) ½. Ì a ó Ì*+ U5 4¼ 2# 0a/. *$, pq í\ ' u pq< m l. )m ä h µ u+
(93) < q ½4.. èh q ½4.
(94) !9 5 /' m
(95). . 9 q5
(96) "Ä' )8w_. ¬ _¥ _mR' %3 k t *$, . Ç 5qü,qx, q¬³"Ä(equivalent. o' _m3 _ 9 m
(97) < ! h Û. 2003, Vol. 47, No. 5.
(98) . 490. Û+
(99) pq< Hp 54.
(100) !9. h
(101) a9 5 üw
(102) , D. 9' ‘_K ² /"",
(103) "Ä ²
(104) Å`. x2 Î µ u { c t adU. !±, ÆÇ, ÆÈÉ ² Æ ¯, /"³Ê ². ¯ ½4.. ¸DË,
(105) /’ 6Ä < ® S . ½4. Ú^9
(106) h W5 . Ä óÀRl 34.
(107) o {< c mn J. a9 x2 üw
(108)
(109) 5
(110) /' â 3Ä ô, 4? úz*+ ? f5 ?
(111) /t Z5 ´ ( ¹® t 5? úz()D m h,
(112) e m h, . ±p3 k + °e !,
(113) pq Þ. ú 0* , C+, N0 _ 5 8), 3. 9 MN Þf ï J / 5 5 Ì(. Ä ô+ U h !, a9 x2 üw. È F[t q !, x.a a pq< !&.
(114)
(115) w*+ =>3
(116) . 9 RH J4.. úz %+ TÔ /5 ¬ , h u+. a9 x2 üw
(117) Î
(118) z, ¹. j< adU¯ ½*$ / |S' 0.86. ,
(119) ² !Ô . pq a/ NC ¹ 5
(120) !9 [RH J! o'
(121) !9. Ó4.31 / 9' o/ . 9
(122) ¸t æ h. 5 o z}t _ + g'0t TÔ< w . _Ë ' kK*+
(123) yE5 D ²
(124) ,. ³ ' < ¹*+ C,- ô(Likert Scale) 3. !9 æ :; .
(125) yE5 ® ú. Ä + ( ¹®t ?f ! a9 x2 ü. N _mRH JH ) 4' ) Ï. w
(126)
(127) w*+ =>3 . 9
(128) Î. úz 5 c t adU¯ ½*$. pq< u + Ú^. ' k + Pm m .
(129) « µ
(130) Q 2m h O ½4.. / |S' 0.82½4.. 65, D x2 Î a .
(131) 5 < / Z.
(132) )|5 _ pq h !.a a9. 5 / +' ÁÂ/7 ?f5 ‘!9 / |. pq< x2*+ [ h ÌÍ l µ B. ó / T ² ô’t *+ 10?
(133). 2`m "#K Î< °e ½4.. x ‘
(134) 1. 7
(135) %æ ’t _.5. . ÐC !{ Ñ ³+' 1982. 9?
(136) ´ /Ã< ?f ½. ì Në Georgia Roadrangka, Yeany, Padilla. 4. 9?
(137) x 9 ‘
(138) 2. ´] !´. / ?f5 Long version GALT(Group Assessment of. /' H0l Ñ ]?’t 15 6?
(139) 5. Logical Thinking)L t ©O¹ . P5 ÐC. ´ /Ã `í32 ?f 2 < . !{³0(Short version)t q ½4.29 ³. pq l dû h q ½! ‘
(140) 8.. !(Cronbach α)' 0.85!, Q' 0.80. | Ì( 9 , 3 4 8 pHÑ ². 4. 9'
(141) üw
(142) , DÎ. ,-4 ;’< 15 ]50 3?
(143) 5. µ u ü ³+ 12ú short version<,. /Ã z ?f h q ½*. x ³L ¬ ³+ 21ú long version< . $ / |S' 0.89½4.. . q5 ¬ ÐC !{ c t µ u 0. . ¹+ adU¯ ½4. 65, { c t / Z5 Ñ +' / ?f5 ³0(TSIS). . ! "#. ÌÍ. t q ½4.30 ³0(Test of Science. 0¹ 6 j7 48.5%+ ] ] . Inquiry Skills)' 12? EF 3ú " 36ú*+ . J' *+ 8 J*] µ 0¹+ 9:. RHJ!. !(KR-20) 0.86, Ñ }¹#` 2.45,. ü´ Ì x 47.3% Ì ´ %æ J'. j È 0.46, j $ 0.594. 9. *+ %RÓ4. ' ÌÍ Ïm . ' )| ³0t ü, x, ¬ %& " 3' q. ¹ 0P x. Z; a ÌÍ< *+ 5 Journal of the Korean Chemical Society.
(144)
(145)
(146)
(147)
(148) . ¸+ <34. µ u 0fgÄ Q '. Table 3. Results(%) of TSIS. B =< a a9 5 üw. Test Pre Midterm Post.
(149) ] Dx2 Î Z R1] R5u 9 ' ‘´ %æ : : kK %æ ’ B= ü³ 9 ~ 53.3, 16.7, 30.0%½*] x³. R1 55.0 55.3 55.6. R2 55.8 55.6 57.2. R3 54.7 56.9 59.7. 491. R4 55.0 55.0 56.9. R5 55.6 55.3 55.8. Mean 55.2 55.6 57.1. 9' 50.0, 20.0, 30.0%L 50.0, 16.7, 33.3%+ ¬³ 9' 46.7, 20.0, 33.3%L 50.0 16.7, 33.3%+. $ %
(150) & "#. ÌÍ . >l c R0 'Ù
(151) òÏ3 R3. { 0y³(TSIS) 9 a9 5 üw . ] R2, R4 u 9' ‘´ %æ : : kK.
(152) Dx2 Î R1 R5 u 9' ü³ . %æ ’ B= ü³ 9 50.0, 16.7, 33.3%. 5 x³L ¬³ TSIS c / R1. L 50.0, 20.0, 30.0%, 53.3, 16.7, 30.0%+ %RÓ!, x. 0.3%L 0.6%, R5' -0.3%L 0.2%+ \ Cl ] ]. ³ 9' 36.7, 23.3, 40.0%L 46.7, 23.3, 30.0%,. { c \ Ù ó ,
(153) <. 50.0, 16.7, 33.3%+, ¬³ 9' 33.3, 23.3, 43.4%. e5 R3 u 9' x³ 9 2.2%, ¬³ . L 40.0, 26.7, 33.3%, 46.7, 16.6, 36.7%+ %RH Table 1. 9 5.0% á c t ] p' *+ %R. (r=.88, p<.05, S.D.=2.42) Table 2(r=.85, p<.05, S.D.. Ó4. 65 ¬ó 5? _ 9¥
(154). =2.49) µ u B (%) È ýt ]. < e5 R2L R4 u 9 x³L ¬³. ? L « ´ %æ 9 +, . TSIS c ' R2 9 -0.2%L 1.4%+, R4 9. 9 kK %æ + ÐC !{ c / ~. 0%L 1.9% c *+
(155) < e5 ¬ó. @WA< B J4. 65, ¸t + a . 9¥ c 3 *+ %RH
(156) < w5 .
(157) ¥< e5 R3 u 5 x. o 0 { c ' Table 3(r=.86, p<.05,. ³L ¬³ ü´ Ì j' 52.5%+ %. S.D.=4.20) ] ? L « ÞN(p<.05) 4' . RÓ!, a9 5 üw
(158) ¥< e5 R1. < B J4(Table 3).. u üw
(159) D x2 Î< e5 R5 u. $ ! '(. ! "#. . 5 x³L ¬³ ü´ Ì j . / 9 o' _m3 _ 9 m
(160) < . ' 47.9%, ' 47.6%+ %RH µµ 4.6%L 4.9%. ! h ÛÛ+
(161) pq< Hp 54.
(162) !9 æ Ä' ‘_K ² /"", . j `t ] pÓ4. Ú^9
(163) < w5 o 0 { c.
(164) "Ä ²
(165) Å` !±, ÆÇ, ÆÈÉ ² . t a 7 ¸
(166) ÞN>(p<.05)<. Æ ¯, /"³Ê ² ¸DË,
(167) /’ 6Ä. B J4(Table 1, Table 2).. *+ µ ÄD4 10 ¥*+ 5 ?
(168) _ h ? 60 ¥*+ 5. Table 1. Improvement(%) of Cognitive level between Pretest and Midterm-test. ¬ %, u+ " j< Ä,5 4¼ 100UZ + É, h Table 4 _m ½4. 9'. Cognition level. R1. R2. R3. R4. R5. 9? _ h üó L ¬ó ~ . Concrete Transitional Formal. -3.3 3.3 0. -3.3 3.3 0. -13.3 6.6 6.7. -3.3 0 3.3. -3.3 3.3 0.
(169) ¥< e ' u(R3) ¥
(170) q ! o. Table 2. Improvement(%) of Cognitive level between Pretest and Post-test Cognition level Concrete Transitional Formal 2003, Vol. 47, No. 5. R1 -6.6 3.3 3.3. R2 -10.0 6.7 3.3. R3 -16.7 6.7 10.0. R4 -6.6 0 6.6. R5 -3.3 0 3.3. 0¹ c t adU¯ ½4. /' üó*+ 10~30% \ C ¹Ó*$, ‘´ %æ : : kK %æ ’
(171) 5 j = 24.7:26.0:28.1%+ ] ] kK %æ Ì ´ %æ ] Ì4 e { 4F \5 *+ %RÓ*] ÞN 0' *+ ] ×4. ' 9.
(172) . 492. Table 4. Results(%) of science process skills to cognitive levels. Concrete Transitional Formal Mean. Generating Problems 23.3 25.2 28.7 25.7. Design of Experiments 28.5 30.2 32.5 30.4. Data Collection 31.8 32.9 34.2 33.0. \ xE5 EF+ 0 *+ Y%RH E0¥ F. aL x.a 9
(173) x24' 0K Z ÏK ab o/ Ï 9
(174) < e 4' a ÄÜ w_ Ú^ 5
(175) . Data Transition 30.3 30.9 32.6 31.3. Drawing Conclusion 21.9 23.9 26.1 24.0. Evaluation. Mean. 12.2 12.6 14.6 13.1. 24.7 26.0 28.1 26.3. Table 6. Results(%) of Manipulative Skills Experiments Traditional Inquiry. R1 38.1 -. R2 35.2 44.4. R3 48.6. R4 48.4. R5 33.4 -. < ) Ï 9 e5 ¸+ ̵34. 65, x _K ² /""(25.7%), /"³Ê ². *+ ¦
(176) üw
(177) 4 . ¸DË(24.0%),
(178) /(13.1%) . úz. 9 ÞN>< B JÓ4. ¸t . / i CG*$,
(179) "Ä ²
(180). 8 Ö,
(181) < e ' u ÌÍ. Å` !±(30.4%), ÆÇ(33.0%), ÆÈÉ ² . !9 pq ' üw
(182) < e '. Æ ¯(31.3%) úz ' *+ 4F á. ÌÍ4 4 )*+
(183) h ½4' . *+ %RH ÌÍ. < B JÓ4.. Z ZÄ4 Z ZÄ. i H5 *+ ] ×4. 65,. -. '( +, & "#. /. t w h MN+ EI Ì. ¸ / ¸ U¯ « üó*+. Í
(184) V Ú^ / 4F 4à4. 30~40% C ¹*+ ] ×4. 65 Table 6. ' Ó4. ÌÍ ?@ H&ç _ JK. (r=.82, p<.05, S.D.=11.33) 9 ' L « . Ú^ {< 4àl fL ' íc JÓ'.
(185) < e5 u(R3) / ¸. Ù _ r %s 9 JH9 5 !. ' 48.6%+ %RÓ!, a9 5 üw
(186). &/ JH ¢ *+ <34.. < e5 u(R1) / ¸' 38.1%. ) * +, & "#.
(187) ä ' . + ] ] ~ u `' j 10.5%+ Þ. ÌÍ / ¸' üó*+ 30~40%. N5(p<.05) `t ] pÓ*$, üó ' üw . \ C ¹*+ ] ×4..
(188) < e ! ¬ó '
(189) < e5 u. 65 Table 5(r=.80, p<.05, S.D.=8.72) 9 ' L. (R2) üó L ¬ó ' µµ 35.2%L 44.4%. «
(190) < e5 u(R3) . + %RH 9.8% M `t ' *+ ¦ . / ¸' 43.9%+ %RÓ!, a9 5 üw.
(191) üw
(192) 4 9 Þ.
(193) < e5 u(R1) / ¸'. N>< B JÓ4. 65, üw
(194) . 33.2%+ ] ] ~ u `' j 10.7%+.
(195) < e5 u `' 10% +. ÞN5(p<.05) `t ] pÓ*$, üó ' üw.
(196) < e5 u ð á¦
(197).
(198) < e ! ¬ó '
(199) < e. ÌÍ < c m*' 5 E*+ <. 5 u(R2) üó L ¬ó ' µµ 31.3%. 34! ¢ J4.. L 41.7%+ %RH 10.4% \ M `t '. Table 5. Results(%) of Scientific Attitudes Experiments Traditional Inquiry. R1 33.2 -. R2 31.3 41.7. R3 43.9. R4 39.0. R5 32.5 -. ÌÍ !.a 2ì ÌÍ+ 0fg Ä kK ¹ J< *+ R0 ¥ %¸ + ´ %æ ¹ J' Journal of the Korean Chemical Society.
(200)
(201)
(202)
(203)
(204) . *+ ] ×*$
(205) < w5 0 { c ' 0¹ á Ì| ÞN5 c < ' *+ %RÓ4. { 0y ³ ¸t ü´*+ üó 4' ¬ó / á l ] ×*$ ó ^
(206) < e5
(207) ó 9 c / ÞN l ] $ *+ ¦
(208) üw
(209) ] DÎ4 o {< c ' 5 E^! 8 JÓ4. 65, *+ ó 4' 5 < q¢ Ö c / M *+ ¦ 4' © F5 5 %& 0 *+ e Ö N/ O< B JÓ4. /] . / 9' üó*+ \ C ¹*+ ] ×*$ üw
(210) 4' m
(211) ] %
(212) < q5
(213) 9 4F c 3 *+ %RÓ4. 6 5, 5 / ¸ ' üó *+ \ C ¹*+ ] ×*$ 0¹ ÚÕ ÌÍ e { ÞN5 `t 0 ' *+ %RÓ4. ¸t /úz+ U x 4F. ZZÄ ' ‘.
(214) "Ä ²
(215) Å` !±’, ‘ÆÇ’, ‘ÆÈÉ ² Æ ¯’ úz4' Pð Z ZÄ ' ‘_ K ² /""’, ‘/"³Ê ² ¸DË’, ‘
(216) 5 /’ úz i H5 *+ ] ×4. ' w! Q _ ¸{< E ! J*$, i 0 Ñ wÔ{ Y%R! J4. uW] 0K< \r*+ Y% ' ab Ã+' L « m ER Ø 5Ä/ J*$, o c < Z S+ ¹ Îk L / Ã< q ' N J' |^! ¢ J4. 65, |r a 9' q3 / ú z< u + q 0 ¡! a ] o . i< !& h Z l Øq h q¢ < _±54. 65, a9 _m3 üw
(217) ], DÎ 9 m
(218) ] O Æ _m . 45 k T ² sTt w h o !{ {< ' ok 4 ² µ o k ' / 5 / °eRH ¢ *+ ̵34. 2003, Vol. 47, No. 5. 493. 1. ASE, Science Teschers’ Handbook. Hutchinson, London, U. K. 1986. 2. Abruscato, J. Teaching children science. Englewood Cliffs, N. J. Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1982. 3. ; ; ; ;
(219) ; ; ; ; ; (
(220) ), , 1995, 34-37. 4. !" #$%, &'() *)#$ +,, 1992. 5. Jeong, K. S.; Heo, M. J. Kor. Assoc. Res. Sci. Educ. 1993, 13(2), 146-151. 6. Choi, B. S.; Kim, D. C.; Nam, J. H. Chem. Educ. 1993, 20(1), 17-20. 7. Nam, J. H. The Construction of Assessment of Students' Skills in Chemystry Experiment, Ph. D. Dissertation, Korea National University of Education, 1996. 8. -, . */ 0 12 34 5 67 8+ 9:, 1986. 9. Choi, B. S.; Nam, J. H. Chem. Educ. 1995, 23(13), 136-143. 10. Robinson, J. American Biology Teacher, 1969, 31(3), 236-240. 11. Timir, P.; Glassman, F, A. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1971, 8(4), 307-315. 12. Comber, L.; Keeves, J. P. Science education in nineteen countries, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1973. 13. Ben-Zvi, R.; Hofstein, A.; Samuel, D.; Kempa, R. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1977, 14(5), 433-439. 14. Baxter, G. P.; Glodman, S. R.; Pine, J. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1992, 29, 1-18. 15. Al Busaidi, R. S.; Allsop, R. T.; Lock, R. J. International Journal of Science Education, 1992, 14(3), 319330. 16. Greig, J.; Wise, N.; Lomark, M. Annual meeting of the American educational research association, New Orleans, 1994, 368-793. 17. Lazarowitz, R.; Tamir, P. Handbook of research on science teaching and learning, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, 1993. 18. Meng, E.; Doran, R. The Science Teacher, 1990, 28(1), 42-45. 19. Choi, B. S.; Heo, M. J. Kor. Assoc. Res. Sci. Educ. 1987, 7(1), 19-32. 20. Woo, J. O.; Kim, J. I. J. Kor. Assoc. Res. Sci. Educ. 1993, 13(2), 296-307. 21. Kang, S. W.; Woo, J. O. J. Kor. Assoc. Res. Sci. Educ. 1995, 15(4), 404-416. 22. Kim, S. W. A Study of Causal Relationship on Science Process Skills and Students’ Characteristics by Cova-.
(221) 494. . riance Structural Analysis, Ph. D. Dissertation, Korea National University of Education, 1996. 23. Tobin, K. G.; Capie, W. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1982, 19(2), 113-121. 24. So, W. J.; Woo, J. O. J. Kor. Assoc. Res. Sci. Educ. 1994, 14(3), 312-320. 25. Jacobson, W. J.; Doran, R. Teachers Collage, Columbia University, New york, 1991. 26. Lee, J. Y. A Study on Development of Special Assessment Criteria and Scale For the Inquiry-Oriented General Chemistry Laboratory Report. M. Ed. Thesis, Ewha Womans University, 1997. 27. ;<=; >?@; A< B C DEF G H: I JKL *) MN, -, 1996. 28. Min, H. Y. Analysis of the Relationship between Cog-. nitive Levels and Achievement of Science Process Skills by Practical Assessment, M. Ed. Thesis, Korea National University of Education, 1997. 29. Choi, Y. J.; Choi, B. S.; Lee, W. S. J. Kor. Assoc. Res. Sci. Educ. 1985, 7(1), 19-32. 30. Lee, J. K. The Development of a Test of Science Inquiry Skills for High School Students, M. Ed. Thesis, Korea National University of Education, 1988. 31. Kim, Y. Y. The Development of Rubrics for the InquiryBased Experiments of General Chemistry, M. Ed. Thesis, Ewha Womans University, 1999. 32. Cha, E. K. Improvement of Science Process Skills According to the Cognitive Levels of Students in General Chemistry Experiments, M. Ed. Thesis, Korea National University of Education, 1999.. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society.
(222)
관련 문서
Effect of the scientific writing through logical thinking development on science inquiry process skills and scientific attitude of elementary
Efficient Condensation of Cycloketones and Acetone Using SOCl 2 /EtOH.. Zhiguo Hu*, Zhibing Dong, Jun Liu, Wenjie Liu, and
erocyclic amines have been the subject of many investigations,9-11 some of these charge-transfer complexes show very interesting applications in the analysis of some drug in pure
Toluene was removed at reduced pressure, and the remaining oil was purified by column chromatography with silica gel to yield 77 mg 90% of 23 as an inseparable mixture of
While NC4N, which is linear, may be described by canonical structures in terms of alternating single and triple bonds, chemical bonding in other geometrical isomers is not that
The solvent was evaporated in vacuo to give crude 9, it purified by column chromatography hexane: ethyl acetate: 10:1 to give a solid 9 9.8 g, 17 mmol.. After confirmate of
Molecularly Imprinted Polymer for Adsorption of Bisphenol A Jae Chun Ryu, Jong-Hun Kim†, and Sang Hee Lee* Department of Chemistry, School of Natural Science, Kunsan
Some wares such as the group CHE2 was high quality wares fired at high temperature around 1200 oC for palace use, but as the ceramics ware became more widely used and the white
