• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

ADR ADR

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "ADR ADR"

Copied!
38
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

. . 1.

2.

. ADR

. ADR

1. ADR 2. ADR 3. ADR

. ADR

1. ADR

2. ADR 3. ADR 4. ADR

5. ADR ADR

.

* , (JSD), (USA)

: 2014. 4. 30. / : 2014. 5. 26. / : 2014. 5. 30.

(2)

I.

ADR

.1)

.

,2) , ,

. ADR

,

.3) ADR , ,

1) ADR

. ‘

ADR ,

(adversarial)

ADR .

ADR . Tina Nabatchi ADR

ADR .

“Alternative dispute resolution ... is an umbrella term ... used in lieu of traditional judicial and administrative dispute resolution processes, such as litigation and administrative adjudication.” Tina Nabatchi, “The Institutionalization of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Federal Government”, Public Administration Review, 67(4), 2007, p. 646.

2) , (ADR) ,

, 2012, 290-297 .

3) , “ -

”, 54 1 , 2010; : ”,

, 2010; , “ :

”, , 2009; , “ (ADR)

”, 30 3 , 2008; , “

”, 32 , 2007; , “ (

) (ADR) : ”, ,

2006; , “ ADR ,” 28 1

(3)

,4) ADR

.5) ADR

. ADR

.

.

ADR

.

ADR , ,

, , ,6)

, , ,

, ,

.

. ADR

, 2006; , “ , , ”, , 2006.

4) , “ ADR ”, 47 3 ,

2013 ; , “ ADR : ”,

, 2012. 12; , “ ADR ”,

10 2 , 2012. 8; , “ ”.

, 2010; , “ ADR ”, 29

1 , , 2009 ; , “ ”,

43 , 2004; , “ ”. , 1996.

5) , , 136 .

6) , , 43 .

(4)

, , ,

ADR

( , , )

. ADR

ADR .

( )

7)

. ADR

, , ,

, .

ADR .

ADR .

ADR

. ADR .

ADR ADR

,

7)

, .

ADR

ADR . ( 13

) .

(5)

. ADR

,

. ADR

,

. ADR

.

ADR

. ADR

. ADR

,

ADR

‘ ’, ‘ ’

ADR .

. (

, )

.

,

.

8) ,

(6)

, , ,

.9) ,

ADR

.

ADR ADR

.

. ADR

ADR , ,

. ADR ,

, .

ADR

ADR

. ADR .

ADR .

.

. ADR

ADR .

.

10) .11)

8) 15 1

ADR .

9) 15 ( )

( " " ) .

(7)

12) .13)

, ,

. ADR

ADR ADR

. ADR

( , )

,

ADR .

, ADR

.

2014 4 ADR

.

. ADR

, ADR

( ) , , ( ),

. ADR

, , ,

10) , “ ”. , 2010, 50 ;

, “ ”, 43 , 2004, 246 .

11) , “ ADR ”, 10

2 , 2012. 8, 43 ; , “ ADR ”,

29 1 , , 2009 , 29 .

12) , , 50 .

13) , , 43 ; , , 29 .

(8)

1 2 3 4 5

( ) X X X O O

15

( ) 9 11

( ) 30 15~50

( )

2

( )

( )

2 ( )

( X)

2

( )

( )

3

( X)

3 ( )

,

( )

,

( )

,

( )

,

( )

,

( )

X O( ) O( ) O O

X X O( ) X X

X X X O O

, ,

50 90 60

( )

14

45

15 15 X 15 15

X

X X X X X

OO( ) O O( ) O O

, ,

, ADR

, .

(9)

6 7 8 9 10 11 (

)

( )

( ) X O( ) X O X X

: 5 ~10

: 7 ~10

( )

11 5 ~10 20 5 ~9

( ) 11

( )

: X : 3 (

)

( )

2 (

)

2 ( )

( X)

2 (1 )

2

( )

( )

3

( )

X X ,

( )

,

( )

7 ,

3 2

X O( ) O( ) O X X

X X O O

( ) X X

X X O X X X

,

X X 1 60 60

( ) X

X X X 15

X X

X X X X X

X X X X X X

X O( ) X O O( ) OO

(10)

12 13 14 15 16 17

( ) O O X X X X

40 ~90 10 ~30 20 ~25 9 X 9

( )

( )

3 (

) 3 (1 ) 3

( )

2 ( )

( X) X X

X

, 3 2

( )

,

( )

X X

O O O( ) O( ) X X

O X O X X X

X O X X X X

, , ,

, ,

14 60 3

( )

20

( ) X X

7

( ) 5 X X X X

, : :

X X X

X X X X X X

OO O O( ) X X X

(11)

18 19 20 21 22 23

( ) X X X X X X

9 20

( ) 10 ~15 15 15 ~40 10

( )

( )

2

( ) X 3

( )

3

( )

3

( X) X

,

( )

3 2

,

( )

,

( ) ( )

,

( )

O X O( ) O O X

X X X O X X

X X X O O X

,

60 X 6 3 3 X

X X X 15 X X

X X

O X O X O X

X X OO

( ) O O X

(12)

24 25 26 27 28

( ) X X O X O

11~15 11 ~15 60 50~100 15

( )

2

( )

2

( X)

3 ( )

( X)

3

( )

2

( )

X X ,

X X X O O

X X X O O

X X X O X

, ,

, , , ,

45

: 60

: 30

60

( ) 90

: 3 , : 9

( )

15 15 X 15 : 60

X

: :

, :

X X X O O

O O X OO OO

(13)

29 30 31 32

( ) ( ) ( )

, , ,

( ) O X X X

, :10 ~50 : 10~70

3 3 3

( ) 3 ( ) 3 ( )

( )

3 ( )

( )

3 ( )

( )

, ,

( )

O( )

X( 19 : )

O( )

, ,

,

,

,

X 60 : 10

: 15 X

X X X X

: , :

:

:

X

X X X X

OO OO OO X

(14)

33 34 35 36 37

( )

( ) ( )

, , ,

( ) X X X O O

3 3 7 15 15

( ) 3 ( ) ( ) 3

( )

3

( )

,

( )

,

( )

,

O( ) O( ) O

X( 19 : ) O O( )

O( ) X X

, ,

,

, ,

X 30 30 60

: 90

: 180

15 15 15 15 : 15

: 60 :

:

: :

X X X O O

OO X X OO O

(15)

38 39 40 41 42 43

( )

( ) X X X X O( ) X

10

( ) 15 10 10 18 : 50

( )

3

( )

( X)

2

( ) X

2

( )

( )

2

( )

2

( )

X

( )

X

,

( )

X X

X O( ) X X X X

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

( )

( )

X 30 60 X X 90

X 15 15 X 30 15

X X X X X X

X O( ) X X O O

(16)

44 45 46 47 48 49

( )

( ) O( ) X X X O X

50 5~10

( )

19 3 15 9

( )

2

( ) X

3

( )

( X)

X 3 (1

)

3 (

) :

, X ,

( )

X , ,

O( ) X O( ) O O O

O X X O

X(

)

( )

O

( )

O X X O O X

,

, ,

60 X X X X 60

15 X X

14 (

)

X X

X X X

O X X X X X

O( ) O( ) O X X O

(17)

50 51 52 53 54

( ) X X X O( ) X

7 9 9 50 9

( )

3

( )

3

( )

3

( )

3

( )

2

( X)

, , , ,

O O O O O

O( ) O( ) O( ) X X

X X X X X

, , , ( ),

( )

60 60 60 30 60

X X X 15 X

X X X X X

O O O O O

(18)

55 56 57 58 59 60 (

)

( ) X X X X X X

30 5

( ) 5 5 ~7

( ) 5 11

( )

( )

2

( )

1

( )

( )

3 (

)

2

(1 )

( )

X X

3 2

( )

X X ,

( ) ( )

O( ) X X X X O( )

O( ) X X X O( ) X

X X O X X X

,

60 X X X X X

20

( ) X X X X X

X X X X

X X X X X X

O X O X X X

(19)

. ADR

ADR , 60

95% 57 5% 3 ( ) .

ADR

.14)

ADR

.

ADR 15)

ADR .

ADR

, 60 16% 10

12% 7

, , ,

14) ADR

,

ADR .

. 15)

. ,

.

, 40 8

.

(20)

5 . ADR ,

, , ,

.16)

ADR 25% 15 ( )

. ( ) 11

4 . ( )

. ,

, ,

, , ,

,

( ,

, ) ,

ADR .

. (

), ( ),

( ) .

, ,

.

‘ ’ ‘ ’

( ) .

16)

, 2006

2007 2010

. , “

”, 48 2 , , 2013. 6, 243-265

.

(21)

ADR ( )

( ) .

, ADR

ADR 78.3% 47 20% 12

1

. ‘ ’, ‘

’ ‘ ’

. 60

, 10 46.7% 28 , 11-20

30% 18 , 21-30 6.7% 4 , 31 15% 9 ,

1 .

, 63.3% 38 , 21.7% 13

15% 9

. 2 3

.

. 3

50% 30 (

5 ). 2

33.3% 20 ( 3 ), 1

1 .

2 5 3 5

,

.

(22)

ADR

. ADR

. 43.3% 26

21.7% 13 35% 21

.

, .

ADR

41.7% 25 33.3% 20 ,

25% 15 .

ADR

.

40% 24

17)

18.3% 11 .

8.3% 5

. 3 2

17)

.

(23)

, 3 2

, 3 2

1 .

.

30% 18 70% 42

.

.

, ‘ ,

18) ,

,

,

.19) .

ADR ,

, ,

.

ADR .

30% 18 , 70% 42

.

18) 19 ( ) .

19) 20 (

) .

(24)

ADR

.

. 1

63 20) 15.9% 10 31 -60

31.7% 20 , 61 -90 12.7% 8

6 9 4.8% 3

.

.

. 15

.

61 21) 31.1% 19 15 ,

11.5% 7 5 , 7 , 14 , 20 , 30 , 60 (2 )

. 61

57.4% 35 .

.

.

20) ,

,

63 .

21) 61 .

(25)

,

.22)

. ADR

. ,

‘ ’ ‘ ’ .

. ADR

18.3% 11 ADR

46.7% 28 .23) 35% 21

. ADR

,24)

.

(Early Neutral Evaluation) (Summary

Jury Trial), (Minitrial), (Arbitration), - (med-arb), -

(arb-med) ADR 25)

22) Robert A. Baruch Bush & Joseph P. Folger, The Promise of Mediation: Responding to Conflict through Empowerment and Recognition, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1994, p. 16.

23) ‘00’,

‘0’ .

24) , , 58 .

25) J. M. Senger, Federal Dispute Resolution, Jossey-Bass, 2004, pp. 32-46.

(26)

ADR

. ADR ADR

, , .

ADR

, ,26)

,27) ,28) 29)

30) .

, , ADR

60 98.3% 59 31) ,32)

26) 88 .

27) 46 2 .

28) 89 .

29) 5 .

30) 402 .

31) 60 1 .

32) ADR

. 24 2(

) 2 ,

.

, .

, .

ADR .

.

24 2( )

...

.

1.

2.

3.

(27)

28.3% 17 . 13.3% 8 .

6.7% 4 , , ,

.

,

.

ADR .

60 59 59

32.2% 19

, 27.1% 16

.

.

59 33.9%

20 .

,

.

, .

.

.33) ADR

4.

33) , ADR -

(ADR) -, , 2010,

150-158 .

(28)

.

(2008.3.21 8955 )

(2012.6.1. 11461 ),

(2012.12.18. 11590 ), (2013.8.6. 12012

) . ,

ADR ,

.

ADR

. 60

13.3% 8

86.7% 52 .

. ADR

ADR

ADR

. 34)

34) (Office of Legal Policy) (Office of

Dispute Resolution) .

(29)

. ADR

.35)

ADR 25%

( ) . ADR

,

( )

. ADR

( )

.

ADR

. ADR

, .

.

http://www.justice.gov/olp/adr/index.html .

35) (The Interagency Alternative Dispute Resolution

Working Group) ADR

. http://www.adr.gov/index.html .

(30)

ADR .

. ‘ ’ ‘

’ .

.

,

.

,

ADR .36)

.

ADR 95% .37) ADR

.38)

. ADR

.

.39) ADR

36) Leonard L. Riskin, “Mediator Orientations, Strategies and Techniques”, Alternative to the High Cost of Litigation, 1994, pp. 111-114 .

37) J. M. Senger, op. cit. p. 33.

38) Id. p. 35.

39) , " ADR ", ,

2012. 2. 27, 10 .

(31)

,40) 1 -3

‘ ’

‘ ’ , ‘ ’

‘ ’

.41) - (med-arb) -

(arb-med) .

ADR ADR .

,

.42)

,

.43) ADR

, ADR

40) Stephen B. Goldberg, Frank E. A. Sander & Nancy H. Rogers, Dispute Resolution:

Negotiation, Mediation and Other Processes, Aspen Law & Business, 1999, p. 123.

41) ' ' ' ' ADR

. Carrie J. Menkel-Meadow, et al., Dispute Resolution: Beyod the Adversarial Model, ASPEN Publishers, 2005, pp. 266-271.

42) , “ADR ”, 331 , 2010 , 53-54

.

43) , “ ADR - ( )”, ,

, 2007, 393-407 .

(32)

‘ ’ ‘ ’

( , )

. ADR

ADR ( , )

, ADR ADR

ADR .44)

.

ADR

ADR ,

.

ADR ADR

. ADR

. ADR

ADR

. ADR

ADR ,

.

,

45) 46)

44) , ADR - ( )

, (KDI), 2012.12 .

45) , “ ”, 뺷CEO Information뺸G

710 , (2009. 6. 24) .

46) Frank E.A. Sander, “Alternative Methods of Dispute Resolution: An Overview”, University of Florida Law Review 37, 1985, p. 8.

(33)

. ADR ADR

. ADR

.47)

[^P Tina Nabatchi, “The Institutionalization of

Alternative Dispute Resolution In the Federal Government”, Public Administration Review, 67(4): 2007, pp. 646-661; Zhiyong Lan, “A Conflict Resolution Approach to Public Administration,” Public Administration Review, 57(1): 1997, pp. 27-35; Nancy J.

Manring, “ADR and Administrative Responsiveness: Challenges for Public Administrators”, Public Administration Review 54(2): 1994, pp. 197-203 .

(34)

, “ (ADR) ”, 30 3 , 2008.

, “ ADR ,”

28 1 , 2006.

, “ ADR ”,

, 2012. 2. 27.

, “ ”. , 2010.

· , “ - ‘ ’

”, 54 1 , 2010.

, “ ADR - ( )”,

, , 2007.

, “ ”,

32 , 2007.

, “ ”. , 1996.

, “ ”, CEO

Information 710 , , 2009. 6. 24.

, ADR -

( ) , (KDI), 2012.12.

, “ADR ”, 331 , 2010 .

, “ ADR : ”,

, 2012. 12.

, ADR -

(ADR)

-, , 2010.

, “ ”, 43 , 2004.

, “ ”,

48 2 , , 2013. 6.

, “ , , ”, , 2006.

, (ADR) ,

(35)

, 2012.

, “ ADR ”,

47 3 , 2013 .

, “ ( ) (ADR) :

”, , 2006.

, “ ADR ”, 29

1 , , 2009 .

, “ :

”, , 2009.

, “ ADR ”,

10 2 , 2012. 8.

“ : ”, , 2010.

Bush, Robert A. Baruch & Joseph P. Folger, The Promise of Mediation:

Responding to Conflict through Empowerment and Recognition, 1994.

Goldberg, Stephen B., Frank E. A. Sander & Nancy H. Rogers, Dispute Resolution:

Negotiation, Mediation and Other Processes, Aspen Law & Business, 1999.

Lan, Zhiyong, “A Conflict Resolution Approach to Public Administration”, Public Administration Review, 57(1), 1997.

Manring, Nancy J., “ADR and Administrative Responsiveness: Challenges for Public Administrators”, Public Administration Review 54(2), 1994.

Menkel-Meadow, Carrie J. et al., Dispute Resolution: Beyod the Adversarial Model, ASPEN Publishers, 2005.

Nabatchi, Tina, “The Institutionalization of Alternative Dispute Resolution In the Federal Government”, Public Administration Review, 67(4), 2007.

Riskin, Leonard L., "Mediator Orientations, Strategies and Techniques", Alternative to the High Cost of Litigation, 1994.

Sander, Frank E.A. “Alternative Methods of Dispute Resolution: An Overview”, University of Florida Law Review, 1985.

Senger, J. M., Federal Dispute Resolution, Jossey-Bass, 2004.

(36)

http://www.law.go.kr

http://likms.assembly.go.kr http://www.kisa.or.kr

The Interagency Alternative Dispute Resolution Working Group http://www.adr.gov/

http://www.justice.gov

(37)

< >

ADR ADR

. ADR

. ADR

. ADR

. ADR , ADR , ADR

, ADR

. ADR

ADR , ADR

, ADR ,

ADR , ADR ADR

.

(38)

Journal of Legislation Research / 46th Issue

:

A Study on Legislative Present Condition and its Improvement Proposal of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Administrative

Process

Park, Chul-Gyoo*48)

This study pays attention to the lack of researches that have comprehensively analyzed the overall status of ADR in the administrative process. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to diagnose its problems and present improvement proposal by analyzing and evaluating the overall current state of legislation concerning ADR institutions in the administrative process. The analysis tables contain elements that are essential and must be considered in dispute resolution procedures in the administrative process. To that end, this study explored the installation basis of the ADR institutions, the structure of the ADR institutions, the ADR procedures in the administrative process, and the forms and forces of ADR in the administrative process. The improvement proposals of the ADR system in the administrative process of Korea are the establishment of exclusive organization dealing with public relations and education regarding ADR for government agencies, the establishment of installation criteria for the Secretariats of ADR institutions in the administrative process, the need of the unification for common elements of ADR procedures, the diversification of ADR methods, and the legislation of the ADR basic act or the administrative ADR act.

* Professor of the National Assembly, JSD, Attorney(USA).

참조

관련 문서

Course Objective.. Provide an environment that will provide the greatest opportunity to accomplish the objective.?. 2. Many companies place a high

purpose of introducing the representative lawsuits in such a trend, it is necessary to review the status of representative cases and judicial issues in

We found that FoxO1 is constantly increased in MCF-7/ADR, adriamycin-resistant breast cancer cells, and FoxO1 has a critical role in the MDR1 gene expression (16).. There is

To investigate the levels of mismatch repair proteins, such as MSH2, MSH6, MSH3, MHL1, and PMS2, in young, intermediate and senescent CCD-18Co and IMR90 cells,

The staff of outstanding hospitals (doctors, nurses, administrative personnel) provide proper medical services that meet the

One more important lesson is that the overall reorganization of administrative struc - tures and laws and regulations has followed the occurrence of HIV

In this article, the issues of administrative information circulations are devided two areas, one is openness and the other is offering of adminis-

The aim of this study was to examine the effects and mechanisms of the new metformin derivative HL156A in human multidrug-resistant cancer cell lines (FADU/PTX,