. . 1.
2.
. ADR
. ADR
1. ADR 2. ADR 3. ADR
. ADR
1. ADR
2. ADR 3. ADR 4. ADR
5. ADR ADR
.
* , (JSD), (USA)
: 2014. 4. 30. / : 2014. 5. 26. / : 2014. 5. 30.
I.
ADR
.1)
.
,2) , ,
. ADR
,
.3) ADR , ,
1) ADR
. ‘ ’
ADR ,
(adversarial)
ADR .
ADR . Tina Nabatchi ADR
ADR .
“Alternative dispute resolution ... is an umbrella term ... used in lieu of traditional judicial and administrative dispute resolution processes, such as litigation and administrative adjudication.” Tina Nabatchi, “The Institutionalization of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Federal Government”, Public Administration Review, 67(4), 2007, p. 646.
2) , (ADR) ,
, 2012, 290-297 .
3) , “ - ‘ ’
”, 54 1 , 2010; “ : ”,
, 2010; , “ :
”, , 2009; , “ (ADR)
”, 30 3 , 2008; , “
”, 32 , 2007; , “ (
) (ADR) : ”, ,
2006; , “ ADR ,” 28 1
,4) ADR
.5) ADR
. ADR
.
.
ADR
.
ADR , ,
, , ,6)
, , ,
, ,
.
. ADR
, 2006; , “ , , ”, , 2006.
4) , “ ADR ”, 47 3 ,
2013 ; , “ ADR : ”,
, 2012. 12; , “ ADR ”,
10 2 , 2012. 8; , “ ”.
, 2010; , “ ADR ”, 29
1 , , 2009 ; , “ ”,
43 , 2004; , “ ”. , 1996.
5) , , 136 .
6) , , 43 .
, , ,
ADR
( , , )
. ADR
ADR .
( )
7)
. ADR
, , ,
, .
ADR .
ADR .
ADR
. ADR .
ADR ADR
,
7)
, ‘ ’ .
ADR
ADR . ( 13
) .
. ADR
,
. ADR
,
. ADR
.
ADR
. ADR
. ADR
,
ADR
‘ ’, ‘ ’
ADR .
. (
, )
.
,
.
8) ,
, , ,
.9) ,
ADR
.
ADR ADR
.
. ADR
ADR , ,
. ADR ,
, .
ADR
ADR
. ADR .
ADR .
.
. ADR
ADR .
.
10) .11)
8) 15 1
‘ ’
ADR .
9) 15 ( )
( " " ) .
12) .13)
, ,
. ADR
ADR ADR
. ADR
( , )
,
ADR .
, ADR
.
2014 4 ADR
.
. ADR
, ADR
( ) , , ( ),
. ADR
, , ,
10) , “ ”. , 2010, 50 ;
, “ ”, 43 , 2004, 246 .
11) , “ ADR ”, 10
2 , 2012. 8, 43 ; , “ ADR ”,
29 1 , , 2009 , 29 .
12) , , 50 .
13) , , 43 ; , , 29 .
1 2 3 4 5
( ) X X X O O
15
( ) 9 11
( ) 30 15~50
( )
2
( )
( )
2 ( )
( X)
2
( )
( )
3
( X)
3 ( )
,
( )
,
( )
,
( )
,
( )
,
( )
X O( ) O( ) O O
X X O( ) X X
X X X O O
, ,
50 90 60
( )
14
45
15 15 X 15 15
X
X X X X X
OO( ) O O( ) O O
, ,
, ADR
, .
6 7 8 9 10 11 (
)
( )
( ) X O( ) X O X X
: 5 ~10
: 7 ~10
( )
11 5 ~10 20 5 ~9
( ) 11
( )
: X : 3 (
)
( )
2 (
)
2 ( )
( X)
2 (1 )
2
( )
( )
3
( )
X X ,
( )
,
( )
7 ,
3 2
X O( ) O( ) O X X
X X O O
( ) X X
X X O X X X
,
X X 1 60 60
( ) X
X X X 15
X X
X X X X X
X X X X X X
X O( ) X O O( ) OO
12 13 14 15 16 17
( ) O O X X X X
40 ~90 10 ~30 20 ~25 9 X 9
( )
( )
3 (
) 3 (1 ) 3
( )
2 ( )
( X) X X
X
, 3 2
( )
,
( )
X X
O O O( ) O( ) X X
O X O X X X
X O X X X X
, , ,
, ,
14 60 3
( )
20
( ) X X
7
( ) 5 X X X X
, : :
X X X
X X X X X X
OO O O( ) X X X
18 19 20 21 22 23
( ) X X X X X X
9 20
( ) 10 ~15 15 15 ~40 10
( )
( )
2
( ) X 3
( )
3
( )
3
( X) X
,
( )
3 2
,
( )
,
( ) ( )
,
( )
O X O( ) O O X
X X X O X X
X X X O O X
,
60 X 6 3 3 X
X X X 15 X X
X X
O X O X O X
X X OO
( ) O O X
24 25 26 27 28
( ) X X O X O
11~15 11 ~15 60 50~100 15
( )
2
( )
2
( X)
3 ( )
( X)
3
( )
2
( )
X X ,
X X X O O
X X X O O
X X X O X
, ,
, , , ,
45
: 60
: 30
60
( ) 90
: 3 , : 9
( )
15 15 X 15 : 60
X
: :
, :
X X X O O
O O X OO OO
29 30 31 32
( ) ( ) ( )
, , ,
( ) O X X X
, :10 ~50 : 10~70
3 3 3
( ) 3 ( ) 3 ( )
( )
3 ( )
( )
3 ( )
( )
, ,
( )
O( )
X( 19 : )
O( )
, ,
,
,
,
X 60 : 10
: 15 X
X X X X
: , :
:
:
X
X X X X
OO OO OO X
33 34 35 36 37
( )
( ) ( )
, , ,
( ) X X X O O
3 3 7 15 15
( ) 3 ( ) ( ) 3
( )
3
( )
,
( )
,
( )
,
O( ) O( ) O
X( 19 : ) O O( )
O( ) X X
, ,
,
, ,
X 30 30 60
: 90
: 180
15 15 15 15 : 15
: 60 :
:
: :
X X X O O
OO X X OO O
38 39 40 41 42 43
( )
( ) X X X X O( ) X
10
( ) 15 10 10 18 : 50
( )
3
( )
( X)
2
( ) X
2
( )
( )
2
( )
2
( )
X
( )
X
,
( )
X X
X O( ) X X X X
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
( )
( )
X 30 60 X X 90
X 15 15 X 30 15
X X X X X X
X O( ) X X O O
44 45 46 47 48 49
( )
( ) O( ) X X X O X
50 5~10
( )
19 3 15 9
( )
2
( ) X
3
( )
( X)
X 3 (1
)
3 (
) :
, X ,
( )
X , ,
O( ) X O( ) O O O
O X X O
X(
)
( )
O
( )
O X X O O X
,
, ,
60 X X X X 60
15 X X
14 (
)
X X
X X X
O X X X X X
O( ) O( ) O X X O
50 51 52 53 54
( ) X X X O( ) X
7 9 9 50 9
( )
3
( )
3
( )
3
( )
3
( )
2
( X)
, , , ,
O O O O O
O( ) O( ) O( ) X X
X X X X X
, , , ( ),
( )
60 60 60 30 60
X X X 15 X
X X X X X
O O O O O
55 56 57 58 59 60 (
)
( ) X X X X X X
30 5
( ) 5 5 ~7
( ) 5 11
( )
( )
2
( )
1
( )
( )
3 (
)
2
(1 )
( )
X X
3 2
( )
X X ,
( ) ( )
O( ) X X X X O( )
O( ) X X X O( ) X
X X O X X X
,
60 X X X X X
20
( ) X X X X X
X X X X
X X X X X X
O X O X X X
. ADR
ADR , 60
95% 57 5% 3 ( ) .
ADR
.14)
ADR
.
ADR 15)
ADR .
ADR
, 60 16% 10
12% 7
, , ,
14) ADR
,
ADR .
. 15)
. ,
.
, 40 8
.
5 . ADR ,
, , ,
.16)
ADR 25% 15 ( )
. ( ) 11
4 . ( )
. ,
, ,
, , ,
,
( ,
, ) ,
ADR .
. (
), ( ),
( ) .
, ,
.
‘ ’ ‘ ’
( ) .
16)
, 2006
2007 2010
. , “
”, 48 2 , , 2013. 6, 243-265
.
ADR ( )
( ) .
, ADR
ADR 78.3% 47 20% 12
1
. ‘ ’, ‘
’ ‘ ’
. 60
, 10 46.7% 28 , 11-20
30% 18 , 21-30 6.7% 4 , 31 15% 9 ,
1 .
, 63.3% 38 , 21.7% 13
15% 9
. 2 3
.
. 3
50% 30 (
5 ). 2
33.3% 20 ( 3 ), 1
1 .
2 5 3 5
,
.
ADR
. ADR
. 43.3% 26
21.7% 13 35% 21
.
, .
ADR
41.7% 25 33.3% 20 ,
25% 15 .
ADR
.
40% 24
17)
18.3% 11 .
8.3% 5
. 3 2
17)
.
, 3 2
, 3 2
1 .
.
30% 18 70% 42
.
.
, ‘ ,
’18) ,
,
,
.19) .
ADR ,
, ,
.
ADR .
30% 18 , 70% 42
.
18) 19 ( ) .
19) 20 (
) .
ADR
.
. 1
63 20) 15.9% 10 31 -60
31.7% 20 , 61 -90 12.7% 8
6 9 4.8% 3
.
.
. 15
.
61 21) 31.1% 19 15 ,
11.5% 7 5 , 7 , 14 , 20 , 30 , 60 (2 )
. 61
57.4% 35 .
.
.
20) ,
,
63 .
21) 61 .
,
.22)
. ADR
. ,
‘ ’ ‘ ’ .
. ADR
18.3% 11 ADR
46.7% 28 .23) 35% 21
. ADR
,24)
.
(Early Neutral Evaluation) (Summary
Jury Trial), (Minitrial), (Arbitration), - (med-arb), -
(arb-med) ADR 25)
22) Robert A. Baruch Bush & Joseph P. Folger, The Promise of Mediation: Responding to Conflict through Empowerment and Recognition, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1994, p. 16.
23) ‘00’,
‘0’ .
24) , , 58 .
25) J. M. Senger, Federal Dispute Resolution, Jossey-Bass, 2004, pp. 32-46.
ADR
. ADR ADR
, , .
ADR
, ,26)
,27) ,28) 29)
30) .
, , ADR
60 98.3% 59 31) ,32)
26) 88 .
27) 46 2 .
28) 89 .
29) 5 .
30) 402 .
31) 60 1 .
32) ADR ‘ ’
. 24 2(
) 2 ,
.
, .
, .
ADR .
.
24 2( )
...
.
1.
2.
3.
28.3% 17 . 13.3% 8 .
6.7% 4 , , ,
.
,
.
ADR .
60 59 59
32.2% 19
, 27.1% 16
.
.
59 33.9%
20 .
,
.
, .
.
.33) ADR
4.
33) , ADR -
(ADR) -, , 2010,
150-158 .
.
(2008.3.21 8955 )
(2012.6.1. 11461 ),
(2012.12.18. 11590 ), (2013.8.6. 12012
) . ,
ADR ,
.
ADR
. 60
13.3% 8
86.7% 52 .
. ADR
ADR
ADR
. 34)
34) (Office of Legal Policy) (Office of
Dispute Resolution) .
. ADR
.35)
ADR 25%
( ) . ADR
,
( )
. ADR
( )
.
ADR
. ADR
, .
.
http://www.justice.gov/olp/adr/index.html .
35) (The Interagency Alternative Dispute Resolution
Working Group) ADR
. http://www.adr.gov/index.html .
ADR .
. ‘ ’ ‘
’ .
.
,
.
,
ADR .36)
.
ADR 95% .37) ADR
.38)
. ADR
.
.39) ADR
36) Leonard L. Riskin, “Mediator Orientations, Strategies and Techniques”, Alternative to the High Cost of Litigation, 1994, pp. 111-114 .
37) J. M. Senger, op. cit. p. 33.
38) Id. p. 35.
39) , " ADR ", ,
2012. 2. 27, 10 .
,40) 1 -3
‘ ’
‘ ’ , ‘ ’
‘ ’
.41) - (med-arb) -
(arb-med) .
ADR ADR .
,
.42)
,
.43) ADR
, ADR
40) Stephen B. Goldberg, Frank E. A. Sander & Nancy H. Rogers, Dispute Resolution:
Negotiation, Mediation and Other Processes, Aspen Law & Business, 1999, p. 123.
41) ' ' ' ' ADR
. Carrie J. Menkel-Meadow, et al., Dispute Resolution: Beyod the Adversarial Model, ASPEN Publishers, 2005, pp. 266-271.
42) , “ADR ”, 331 , 2010 , 53-54
.
43) , “ ADR - ( )”, ,
, 2007, 393-407 .
‘ ’ ‘ ’
( , )
. ADR
ADR ( , )
, ADR ADR
ADR .44)
.
ADR
ADR ,
.
ADR ADR
. ADR
. ADR
ADR
. ADR
ADR ,
.
,
45) 46)
44) , ADR - ( )
, (KDI), 2012.12 .
45) , “ ”, 뺷CEO Information뺸G
710 , (2009. 6. 24) .
46) Frank E.A. Sander, “Alternative Methods of Dispute Resolution: An Overview”, University of Florida Law Review 37, 1985, p. 8.
. ADR ADR
. ADR
.47)
[^P Tina Nabatchi, “The Institutionalization of
Alternative Dispute Resolution In the Federal Government”, Public Administration Review, 67(4): 2007, pp. 646-661; Zhiyong Lan, “A Conflict Resolution Approach to Public Administration,” Public Administration Review, 57(1): 1997, pp. 27-35; Nancy J.
Manring, “ADR and Administrative Responsiveness: Challenges for Public Administrators”, Public Administration Review 54(2): 1994, pp. 197-203 .
, “ (ADR) ”, 30 3 , 2008.
, “ ADR ,”
28 1 , 2006.
, “ ADR ”,
, 2012. 2. 27.
, “ ”. , 2010.
· , “ - ‘ ’
”, 54 1 , 2010.
, “ ADR - ( )”,
, , 2007.
, “ ”,
32 , 2007.
, “ ”. , 1996.
, “ ”, CEO
Information 710 , , 2009. 6. 24.
, ADR -
( ) , (KDI), 2012.12.
, “ADR ”, 331 , 2010 .
, “ ADR : ”,
, 2012. 12.
, ADR -
(ADR)
-, , 2010.
, “ ”, 43 , 2004.
, “ ”,
48 2 , , 2013. 6.
, “ , , ”, , 2006.
, (ADR) ,
, 2012.
, “ ADR ”,
47 3 , 2013 .
, “ ( ) (ADR) :
”, , 2006.
, “ ADR ”, 29
1 , , 2009 .
, “ :
”, , 2009.
, “ ADR ”,
10 2 , 2012. 8.
“ : ”, , 2010.
Bush, Robert A. Baruch & Joseph P. Folger, The Promise of Mediation:
Responding to Conflict through Empowerment and Recognition, 1994.
Goldberg, Stephen B., Frank E. A. Sander & Nancy H. Rogers, Dispute Resolution:
Negotiation, Mediation and Other Processes, Aspen Law & Business, 1999.
Lan, Zhiyong, “A Conflict Resolution Approach to Public Administration”, Public Administration Review, 57(1), 1997.
Manring, Nancy J., “ADR and Administrative Responsiveness: Challenges for Public Administrators”, Public Administration Review 54(2), 1994.
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie J. et al., Dispute Resolution: Beyod the Adversarial Model, ASPEN Publishers, 2005.
Nabatchi, Tina, “The Institutionalization of Alternative Dispute Resolution In the Federal Government”, Public Administration Review, 67(4), 2007.
Riskin, Leonard L., "Mediator Orientations, Strategies and Techniques", Alternative to the High Cost of Litigation, 1994.
Sander, Frank E.A. “Alternative Methods of Dispute Resolution: An Overview”, University of Florida Law Review, 1985.
Senger, J. M., Federal Dispute Resolution, Jossey-Bass, 2004.
http://www.law.go.kr
http://likms.assembly.go.kr http://www.kisa.or.kr
The Interagency Alternative Dispute Resolution Working Group http://www.adr.gov/
http://www.justice.gov
< >
ADR ADR
. ADR
. ADR
. ADR
. ADR , ADR , ADR
, ADR
. ADR
ADR , ADR
, ADR ,
ADR , ADR ADR
.
Journal of Legislation Research / 46th Issue
:
A Study on Legislative Present Condition and its Improvement Proposal of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Administrative
Process
Park, Chul-Gyoo*48)
This study pays attention to the lack of researches that have comprehensively analyzed the overall status of ADR in the administrative process. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to diagnose its problems and present improvement proposal by analyzing and evaluating the overall current state of legislation concerning ADR institutions in the administrative process. The analysis tables contain elements that are essential and must be considered in dispute resolution procedures in the administrative process. To that end, this study explored the installation basis of the ADR institutions, the structure of the ADR institutions, the ADR procedures in the administrative process, and the forms and forces of ADR in the administrative process. The improvement proposals of the ADR system in the administrative process of Korea are the establishment of exclusive organization dealing with public relations and education regarding ADR for government agencies, the establishment of installation criteria for the Secretariats of ADR institutions in the administrative process, the need of the unification for common elements of ADR procedures, the diversification of ADR methods, and the legislation of the ADR basic act or the administrative ADR act.
* Professor of the National Assembly, JSD, Attorney(USA).