• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Total laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy; which one is better?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Total laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy; which one is better?"

Copied!
1
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

AHBPS

Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

www.ahbps.org S366

Total laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy;

which one is better?

Munseok CHOI

1

, Ho Kyoung HWANG

2,3

, Woo Jung LEE

2,3

, Chang Moo KANG*

,2,3

1

Department of Surgery, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea

2

Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

3

Pancreaticobiliary Cancer Clinic, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea

EP-167

Introduction: Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy is a difficult and complex operation. Since the development of the ro- botic platform, the number of reports on robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery has been on the rise. This study aimed to compare the technical feasibility and safety between the LPD and the robotic-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RALPD).

Methods: From September 2012 to August 2020, this study enrolled 257 patients who underwent minimally invasive pancreaticodu- odenectomy for periampullary tumor. Of these patients, 207 underwent the LPD, and 50 underwent RALPD. We performed a 1:1 pro- pensity score-matched (PSM) analysis.

Results: There was no difference in demographics, including the size of the pancreatic duct, pancreatic texture, and vascular resec- tion. Operation time and estimated blood loss were similar, as was the incidence of complications, such as POPF, delayed gastric emp- tying, and postoperative hemorrhage. When comparing LPD and RALPD in only patients with a pancreatic duct size of 2 mm or less, there was no difference between the two groups in short-term surgical outcomes, including clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF). In multivariable analysis, robotic reconstruction was not a predictive factor for CR-POPF, and the only soft pancreatic texture was a pre- dictive factor for CR-POPF (HR 3.887, 95% confidence interval 1.121 to 13.480, p = 0.032).

Conclusions: RALPD and LPD are one of the approaches for safe and effective PD, and they are technically equivalent regardless of the size of the pancreatic duct. Considering the high cost of robotic surgery, surgeons need to prepare not only robotic but also the pure laparoscopic technique for PD to fulfill the goal of MIS.

pISSN: 2508-5778ㆍeISSN: 2508-5859

Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2021;25 Suppl 1:S366 https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.EP-167

Corresponding Author: Chang Moo KANG ([email protected]) Presenter: Munseok CHOI ([email protected])

Copyright Ⓒ The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

참조

관련 문서

3 Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.. 4 Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine,

4 The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, and 5 Department of Surgery, Kwandong University College of Medicine, Goyang,

1 Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; 2 Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases Etiology Research Center, Yonsei

*Clinical Trial Center, Yonsei University Health System, † Department Family Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.. Purpose: Recognition

2 Song-dang Institute for Cancer Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 3 Orthopaedic Oncology Clinic, National Cancer Center, Goyang, 4 Center for

Departments of Surgery, 1 Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul; 2 Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University

1 Department of Surgery, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, 2 Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery,

1 Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 2 Division of Nursing, 3 Department of Quality Improvement (QI), Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea1. Journal