Printed in the Republic of Korea
Fe
2+Fe
3+*
(2002. 6. 11 )
Development of an Analytical Method for the Spectrometric Simultaneous Determination of Fe
2+and Fe
3+Ions Using a Technique of Flow
Injection Analysis
Hoon Hwang* and Jinho Kim
Department of Chemistry, Kangwon National University, Chunchon 200-701, Korea (Received June 11, 2002)
. H2O2 Fe2+ (Fe2+Fe3+) Fe3+ SCN−
Fe(SCN)3−xx ! " # $% &'(%)*+, -. Fe2+ Fe3+ /0" 12 .3 4 5 6 7189 : )*, ;<=>. )*, ;? 6 89@A B C
12 DEF(Fe2+ GH I Fe3+ GHJ)@AK LMN " +0 )*,6" OF P Q R @A6 71 ST U>" VW QX>. )*, Y8A" [Fe3+]=6.00Z10−7 M[>.
: &\(%)*, ](II), ](III)
ABSTRACT. An analytical method for the spectrometric simultaneous determination of the individual ions in the mix- tures of Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions utilizing a technique of flow injection analysis has been developed. The method was based on the oxidation reaction between Fe2+ ion and H2O2 in an acidic medium and the subsequent formation of a red Fe(SCN)x3-x
ion by the complexation reaction between Fe3+ ion and SCN− ion. Unlike the conventional methods which require separate processes for the pre-treatment of the sample solution, the current method uses the same FIA system for the pre-treatment and the analysis of the sample. The detection limit for the determination of Fe3+ ion was found to be 6.00×10−7M.
Keywords: Flow Injection Analysis, Fe(II), Fe(III)
(^X .3 0_" Fe2+ ` .3 a
>b Fcd(ligand)6 e>f H2Og h
ij k" Fe(H2O)6
2+ !lm 0_"n, ( o/+ pqrf Fe(H2O)6
3+sm tu v>.
wxsm .3 w^y" Fe2+ "
Fe2+ Fcd z{, .3 | `F}
pH ~ ` 8$Q >u y>. Fe2+
" .3 Fe2+ Fe3+
rf, > @Am Fe3+ Q) (Fe3++ 3H2O=Fe(OH)3+3H+) w^>. 4 y + . 3" Fe3+ Q) Xr^
Fe(OH)3(s) .3 xsm oR
, .3" Q) r^ Fe2+
1 U>. , |Q (u
(donor atom) Fcd6 Fe2+ Hx 8
# ! + Fe2+ K T U>. Gm, 1, 10-phenanthroline" Fe2+
Fe(phen)3
2+(ferroin: -J R1
) ! , # (
h b Fe(phen)33+sm U>.
Fe2+ " .3 w^y" Fe2+
g ` ~b Fe2+ $o " 1 2 4 v Fe2+ 89 ¡ xR ¢
V£K i¤T U>. ~ Fe2+ " . 3 w^y" Fe2+ K + : . 3 pH=2~38$ sm 6^(}, |K
¥1¦(bubbling) .3 4 § U" K L ¨ ©, 4oC $ ª;Q U" F«
y ¬F® .+ ¯°>. `y p±
$ ²³} ` a$" ´FR Fe2+ " Dµ XS U>. ~ (^X $ Fe2+
.3 0_" Fe2+ Fe3+ $K ¶·
+ : )*, ¸¹ º, »_ .3 4 Fe2+
Fe3+ 89+ : > )*,61-9 (¼u)*, x8)*, Q1½ )¾)*, ¿ "
Àq )¾)*, X-½ )*, D+)*, &'(%)
* Á) ;<r^ -.r} U>. `y 6 +0
)*,6 ÂÃ Fe2+ Fe3+ C12 4 ;
?6 )F89 S+ : " 12 .3 a Fe2+ ÄP Fe3+sm ÅÆ" GH @Ay 12.3 4 Fe3+ ÄP Fe2+sm oJ" GHJ@AQ ½Sr^N >" ÇLmÈ ·É} U>.
³" Fe2+ Fe3+ /0" 12 4 5 )F89 : Fe2+ H2O2 -
-J Fe3+ SCN− - #
$% &'(%)*+, -. 12 G HEF@Ag Ê)*@AK 71 ST U"
)*, ;<=>.
FIA system. ÊË -. FIA system A¥
$Q Fig. 1 ÊÌU>. system" peristaltic pump(B, Ismatec MV Pump System)g 3; channel 6 -., 5 channel ¥ .3 Í :
" Tygon pump tubng(i.d.: 0.44 mm, Cole-Parmer Instrument Company)6 -.=>. , pump©
system· ÄÎ line6 : " ·Â 0.38 mm
ÏÐѰ(PTFE tubing) -.=>. Sample injection valve(C, Rheodyne 6-port valve, loop volume:
110µL) (%v 12.3(Fe2+ Fe3+
/0" .3) pump Ò ÇÓ channel ¥
&' ~ FIA system ·Ôm Ív>.
12.3 &' Ò ÇÓ mixing T(D) pump
P ÇÓ channel ¥ .3 &' Õ © Ö w(reaction coil)(E) ¥u v>. Pump P ÇÓ channel Âà pumpD ר 3-way valve(A)
¸¹ ~ &' H2O2.3 &' ½ ÙT U$j =>. 3-way valve &'
½Ùr" ÂÃ" P ÇÓ channel ¥ &'
12.3 Õ" Ò ÇÓ mixing T" ¼Ú w^yR ¢s, 12.3 4" Fe2+
Fe3+ `m /0u v>. `y 3-way valve H2O2.3 &' ½Ùr" ÂÃ" Ò Ç Ó mixing T H2O2 Fe2+ Q w^
y 12.3" Fe3+ 0_u v>. Ö w 10 cm8$ PTFE tubing ÛÜ !lm Ý
ºsm mixing tee MÞ yß" P Q R .36 àw Õá â $
>. Ò ÇÓ mixing Tg Öw R .3 &'
P ÇÓ mixing T(F) pump ã ÇÓ channel
y"n, P .36 P ÇÓ Öw ¥
f 12.3 4 Fe3+ ã ÇÓ channel &
" SCN− y Fe(SCN)3−xx r" # XSv>. P ÇÓ Öw R
.3 &' +ÉL(de-gassing line)(H) ¥ Fig. 1. Schematic Diagram of the FIA System. A: 3-way valve, B: peristaltic pump, C: sample injection valve, D: first mixing T, E: reaction coil, F: second mixing T, G: reaction coil, H: de-gassing line, I: detector, J: recorder.
©, äq+(I, UV/VIS detector, 10µL flow through cell V#, å¿æV: 480 nm, Spectra Physics)K ¥
f .3 4 Fe(SCN)x3−x ¿¾$Q Y 8v>. +ÉL ÊË v FIA system
< +É(H2O2.3 ) Á <)6
äq+ %r^ i¤T U" äqçè ²
8, é, êçè < ÀR} ר=>. +É
L 30 cm8$ ëã >/ ¬Fìm¸® í
°(·Â: 400µm, pore size: 0.2µm, îà /$<porosity>:
~40%, ï¡ð: Celagard X-20, Hoechst-Celanese) ñ ò ·Ôm 25 gauge (-Åó6 ô%
=>. +ÉL FIA system -. PTFE°
: (-Åó ñ ò Ô) xõ
ö+ PVC° ·Ôm ô% © PVC° >b ñ ò Ô) ·Ô" PTFE° ô%=>. , +É
L +ÉL÷ø ù1ú+ : ¸¹
back pressureK + : FIA system ò Ô)
v äq+ drainÔ) û ·Â ü PTFE
° ©, ° ò Ô) ý)µ þ ÿ : Ø1>.
FIA system . ÊË -.
FIA system" 7w 12.3 P Ç (%
`mÔ P ; çè(peak)6 uv>. Pump
D רv 3-way valveK õ P ÇÓ channel ¥ &' ½Ù ©, sample injection valve K ¥ Fe2+ Fe3+ /0" 12.
3 Ò ÇÓ (% ^X>. Ò ÇÓ mixing T
ÕX 12.3 P ÇÓ mixing T KSCN .3 y}, RW 12.3 4 Fe3+
SCN−- XSr^ Fe(SCN)x3−x
Î>. v Fe(SCN)x3−x ¿¾$Q ä q+ Y8r}, äq+ v +j+ 12 .3 Ò ÇÓ (% ^X Ò ÇÓ peakQ + jv>. Ò ÇÓ peakQ +jv © 3-way valveK õ
P ÇÓ channel ¥ H2O2.3 &' $
>. P ÇÓ channel ¥ H2O2.3 FIA system âDµ ¥" 1W f 7w 12.3
P ÇÓ (% ^X>. 12.3 Ò ÇÓ mixing T P ÇÓ channel H2O2.3 &' yf 1 2.3 a Fe2+ H2O2 Fe3+sm v>. © Fe3+ 12.3 P ÇÓ mixing T KSCN.3 y Fe3+ SCN−
- # w^y} ` +j+" P Ç Ó peakQ +jv>. w 12.3 Fe2+ 0 _" ÂÃ" +j+" Ò ÇÓ peak" yyR
¢} P ÇÓ peak +jr"n, P ÇÓ çè ö +(peak height)" 12.3 4 Fe2+ $g H
°AK yyu v>. w 12.3 Fe2+ Fe2+
/0" ÂÃ P ; peak6 ÄP +jv
>. é, Ò ÇÓ peak" 12.3 4 Fe3+
º}, P ÇÓ peak" 12.3 4 Fe2+ Fe3+
ÄP ^X º>.
. FeSO4· 7H2O(extra pure, Junsei Chemical)g Fe(NO3)3· 9H2O(extra pure, Junsei Chemical) ~0.14 M HNO3.3 § stock solution6 ©, 5 stock solution6 xõµ (~0.14 M HNO3.3 .Ûm -.) ¸¹ $ .36 =>. HNO3 .3 -. " Fe3+ Q) K ÀR+
: >.1 HNO3.3 -.sm Fe2+ .3
Fe2+ Q r " Fe3+ Q ) K .3 Fe(OH)3.3sm o" º ÀR+ >. `y Fe2+ ¨.36  Ã" ÄÎ .36 -.D =>. , KSCN(extra pure, Junsei Chemical) X H2O2.3 ($: ~30%) -. ¸¹ $ KSCN H2O2
.36 -.=>. ÊË" ¸¹
ÂÃ i(pure water, Milli Q, Academic, Millipore) K -.=>.
KSCN . ÊË" Fe3+
SCN−- # .>[Fe3++xSCN−= Fe(SCN)x3−x(+ x=1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)]. SCN− $ ~ > !l
6 Us, 6 #6 Fe(SCN)x3−x
sm »T U>. ~ $:Q 10−6M~10−3 M " Fe3+ Berer , ~
" Fe(SCN)x3−x6 6^ U" SCN−
åx$K ¶ ¸¹Q U>. K : P QR
$(4.00Z10−5M 1.00Z10−3M) Fe3+ >
$(0.010, 0.050, 0.10, 0.20, 0.40, 0.60, 0.80, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 M) SCN− m 1 ©, v Fe(SCN)x3-x ¿¾$(å¿æV: 480 nm
-½S³ )6 °=>(Table 1: ï [SCN-]
=0.010, 0.10, 0.20, 0.40, 0.80, 1.0 M ÂÃ
" data Ê[). Table 1 f Fe3+ $
Q ÂÃ(4.0Z10−5 M) SCN− $Q 0.10 M
f Fe(SCN)x3-x ¿¾$Q »µ ù Q ¶ U>. " Fe3+ " .3
$Q ÛÃ ÂÃ Fe3+ SCN−-
m w^y+ : " ý) SCN−
([SCN−]0.10 M) / (^N ë>.
`y SCN− $Q 0.10 M¯> X R" ÂÃ
" ¿¾$ ùQ `F öR ¢$ U>.
Fe3+ $Q X([Fe3+]=1.00Z10−3 M) ÂÃ$
H K UR, Fe3+ $Q
ÂÃg" OF SCN− $Q 0.10 Mï
SCN− $Q ùQ$ ¿¾$" L o
R ¢ U>. " Fe3+ $Q X
ÂÃ" SCN− $Q 0.10 M8$ f L
Ô) Fe3+ Fe(SCN)x
3-xsm o+
sm 5T Us, ~ 0.10 M¯> X
$ SCN− -. ²¸¹ ¯(" º
>. `y $ Fe3+ ¯> þ
¿¾$K U>" º )*, Y8A(limit of detection, LOD)" | U>" -Ê ë>. ~ ÊË" X $(1.00Z 10−3M) Fe3+ -. ¯>"
$(4.00Z10−5 M) Fe3+ ^X
¯> H4 Pu r[>. ~ SCN−
$Q ùQ ~ ^R" peak height o Ä!
¶¯"s, ` " > #>. Table 1
f [Fe3+]=4.00Z10−5M ÂÃ SCN− $Q 0.20 M rf 0.10 M ÂÃ H peak heightQ 1.1$ ùQ}, 040 M rf 0.20 M H peak height Q 1.17$ ùQ, 0.80 M rf 0.40 M H peak heightQ 1.13$ ùQ=>. é, SCN− $
Q 2$ ùQrf Y8v peak height o Hø
0.20 M 0.40 Mm ùQ" ÂÃQ QV öu y
%>. & Hj ( X $(G, 2.0 M) SCN−
-." ÂÃ $ Fe3+ ¿¾
$m > ' " U(R )* Â
)>f SCN− åx$m 0.40 M 8
$ ' ½Ù" º Å*> T U(>.
Fe3+ SCN− - +
,10" P 6 - smÔ r"
Fe(SCN)x3-x ¿¾$g Fe3+ $-
°A" QR ¹6 Beer , ` F - ~R .T $ UR, ý)µ X $
SCN− -." ÂÃ / $ Fe3+
Beer , 0 U>" -Ê ¶ U>. , $Q 0.5 M SCN− -."
Âà r" Fe(SCN)x3-x å¿æV 480 nm á 1µ} U>. ~ Bg # ÊË6
, ·. 2L © ÊË" KSCN.
3 åx$m 0.50 M -.=>.
H2O2 . )*," H2O2K - . 12.3 v Fe2+ Fe3+s m (2Fe3++H2O22Fe3++2OH−)1 ©, > @A m Fe3+ SCN−- # $u v>. ~ $:Q 10−6M~10−3 M " Fe2+
K $u »_ FIA system -.
T H2O2.3 åx$K ¶¯">. K : >
$(4.00Z10−6 M, 4.00Z10−5 M, 4.00Z10−4 M)
Fe2+ K : 0.010 M, 0.10 M, 1.0 M
H2O2K -. ©, v Fe3+smÔ 6^X Fe(SCN)x3-x ¿¾$K Y8 H2O2 $Q
¿¾$ ëØ" 3 -=>(Table 2). Table 2
f [H2O2]=0.010 M ÂÃ QV $
(4.00Z10−6 M) Fe3+smÔ QV peak height K Us4m 0.010 M H2O2.3 -.sm )*, Y8AQ QV | U>" 58 Q 6>. `y Fe2+ $Q ¯> X Rf peak height6 W 7 ¯>. é, Fe2+
$Q 100$ ùQ ~b peak height ùQHø
85$ 8$ `Ø} Us, " Fe2+ )*
)$(sensitivity)Q | U>" -Ê ë>.
1.0 M H2O2.3 -.= ÂÃ" Fe2+
$o ~b peak height o Hø 10$ ï (4.00Z10−6M4.00Z10−5 M ÂÃ 11.3$ ùQ, 4.00 Table 1. The comparison of the peak heights obtained from the
reaction of Fe3+(4.00×10−5 M and 1.00×10−4 M) with SCN− of various concentrations
KSCN, M 0.01 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.0 [Fe3+]=4.00×10−5 M 14 625 694 816 922 965 [Fe3+]=1.00×10−4 M 11 103 107 110 - -
Z10−5 M4.00Z10−4 M ÂÃ" 10.8$ ùQ)sm y%s, ~ >b $(0.01 M 0.10 M) H2O2
.36 -." ÂÃ H )*, )$" 8
| U ë>. `y Fe2+ $Q Q V (4.00Z10−6M) ÂÃ QV peak heightK y·"n, " H2O2.3 $Q 0.010 M 0.10 M
ÂÃ H Y8A" þ| U ë
>. & ÊË" Fe2+ )* ¯
> / $: 9M Q6} 71 Q6
Y8AK 5³} Us4m 1.0 M H2O2.3
-. `F Å*R .> T U>. g" O F H2O2.3 $Q 0.10 M ÂÃ" QV
$ Fe2+ ¿¾$ ÂÃ 0.010 M H `F R ¢s, 71 Fe2+ $Q X
ÂÃ ^X ¿¾$Q QV '64m Fe2+
)*, Y8Ag )$ P QR °W6 ÄP U^ QV Å* ºsm 5T U>.
>, ÂÃ Fe2+ $ùQ ~b peak height
ùQHø 1.0 M H2O2.3 -. H >
7 U>. é, H2O2.3 $Q 1.0 M Â Ã" Fe2+ $Q 4.00Z10−6 M4.00Z10−5M m ùQ ~ peak height" 11.3$ ùQ} >1 Fe2+ $Q 4.00Z10−5 M4.00Z10−4 Mm ù Q ÂÃ" 10.8$ ùQ Fe2+ $ùQ
peak height ùQHø 4.4% ) f, H2O2.3 $Q 0.10 M ÂÃ 55 10.6$g 9.6
$m 9.4% )K ¯=>. ~ g # peak
height o Hø)»ï ¯â+ : © Ê
Ë" 0.20 M H2O2.3 -.=>.
FIA system . Fe3+ SCN−-
Fe(SCN)x3−x ÂÃ ` ß : 1c7 RrR .>. ` " SCN−
Fe3+ J U+ , ;< p qr" ÂÃ ` 8$Q = X>.5~ Fe3+
SCN− v Fe(SCN)x3−x ¿¾
$" Q6 >b 1c · Y8r^N >. `y
>b sm" H2O2 Fe2+ g Fe3+
SCN−- # :" å
1c (^ÞN 4m ÊË -. FIA system x. N T åxa ?¯">. K : 0.20 M H2O2 0.50 M KSCN, `F} 1.00Z10−4 M Fe2+ .3 -. FIA system a ¿
¾$- °AK H=>. ` ÊË
-. FIA system ÂÃ pump a$o ~b
¿¾$ o " ( u y%s, ~ )*,
ça  }Ì »_ FIA system
0.742 mL/min a y·$j pump 7a$
K }8=>.
Fe(SCN)x3−x H2O2 !-"
#. ë + Åg # ÊË -."
FIA system ÂÃ 7w 12.3 P Ç (%u v>. 12.3 Ò ÇÓ (% pump P ÇÓ channel ¥ &" 7 ^R, P ÇÓ (% P ÇÓ channel ¥ H2O2.3 &" 7
^X>. ~ w 12.3 Fe3+
0_" ÂÃ" þQ m # P ; peak6 U^N >. `y pump P ÇÓ channel ¥ H2O2 &' Fe(SCN)x3−x 8$
(stability) 3 ë@>f, 7w 12.3(Fe3+
) (%sm ur" P ; peak6
þQ m O| Q U>. ²Su$ ÊËÊ
S beaker scale experiment f, Fe(SCN)x3−x
.3 X $(~3%) H2O2.3 Q" ÂÃ Fe(SCN)x3−x -R" » ï °Y=>. ~ FIA system -." ÊË
$ (^X $ Fe3+ ¨.3smÔ ^
Ru P ÇÓ peak þQ Ò ÇÓ peak þ
H > º" -Ê GYT U>. Aµ, Table 2. The comparison of the peak heights obtained from the reaction of Fe3+(4.00×10−6 M, 4.00×10−5 M, and 4.00×10−4 M) with 0.50 M SCN− in the presence of various concentrations of H2O2
[Fe3+], M Rlative peak height
0.010 M H2O2 Relative increase 0.10 M H2O2 Relative increase 1.0 M H2O2 Relative increase
4.00×10−6 1126.28 1(1) 023.00 1(1) 1119.241 1(1)0
4.00×10−5 1237.63 9.03(9.03) 243.49 10.59(10.59) 217.14 11.29(11.29)1
4.00×10−4 2240.85 19.43(85.15) 2347.290 0.9.64(102.09) 12341.3100 10.78(121.71)
/ $:(10−6 M~10−3 M) Fe2+ )*
Fe2+ âD K : 0.20 M H2O2.3 -." »_ FIA system" H2O2 `
3 ¼1T eu v>. é, 12.3B> Fe2+
m öu >>f Fe2+ 1ú } C" H2O2 »µ O| º}, & 12 .3 ~ H2O2 3 >u yD ºsm GYT U>. ~ H2O2 $o Q Fe(SCN)x3−x
8 ëØ" 3 89xsm Eð N T
¸¹Q Us, ÊË" $:Q 1.00Z10−6 M~8.00Z10−4 M Fe3+ ¨.36 ëØ"
H2O2(0.20 M) 3 ¶¯">. Fig. 2" Fe3+
¨.36 (% Ò ÇÓg P ÇÓ peak height6 [Fe3+] $1 º>. + -.
v peak height6 ÄP .Ûm -. 0.1 M HNO3
v ë9 Fe2+ Fe3+ peak height (blank value)K F^¨ '6>. `G ~f, B
ë GY Åg # Fe3+ $ ~
H2O2 ) r^ -R" Fe(SCN)x3−x
>, Fe3+ $Q X Rf H2O2
3 ) U>(`y Fe3+ $Q X |j ) r" Fe(SCN)x3−x õx
HX>). & 7w $ Fe3+ ¨.3 -. " P ; peak6 H2O2 3
m >b þK ¯}, peak height
Q ÄÎ $ 7w Høm$ yyR ¢s 4m C12 4 Fe2+ Fe3+ 89
`F c@ ¡ I º>. `y >S º
Fig. 2 UJ (^X $: · 55
peak height6 Fe3+ $o ½ xsm o " Ä! ¯>" -Ê>. ~ (
^X )* Fig. 2g # ä8½ Ly x õ Fe3+ ¨.36 -. 12 4 Fe2+
Fe3+ 89 Q6 | U" º>.
12.3 4 Fe2+ Fe3+ 89. »_ FIA system -. Fe2+ Fe3+ 898 ×ðf > #>. Fe2+ Fe3+ /0
" 12.3 -. P ; peak height6 ³
©, P ÇÓ peak heightK Fig. 2g # ä8½
Hf 12.3 v Fe3+ DK$(CD K=¤ 12 4 0_L Fe3+ Fe2+
H2O2 r^ M Fe3+=[Fe3+]+[Fe2+]) K ³T U>. 12.3 Ò ÇÓ peak height (h1st)g P ÇÓ peak height(h2nd)K -. N(OCDK Z(h1st/h2nd)=[Fe3+]P) ¤Ô 12.3 0 _L Fe3+ $([Fe3+])K ³>. BRísm OC-[Fe3+]=[Fe2+]P 12.3 4 Fe2+
$([Fe2+])K A>. Table 3 1.00Z10−5 M 1.00 Z10−4 M Fe2+ ¨.36 ©, 11cB>
5 12.3(Fe2+ ¨.3) a CU" Fe2+
v Fe3+ $K Y8 K ¯¨
>. ÊË" ë 12.3 $(C=[Fe3+] +[Fe2+]=Fe2+ ¨.3 $)6 ¶ÌÞ Us4 m Fe2+ Fe3+ 89 P ÇÓ peak height 6 -.T ¸¹Q e[s, B ³ ä8½ -.R ¢} ¸¹T B> xõ $ Fe3+
¨.36 -.=>. é, (^X $ 12.3 (% Ò ÇÓ peak height(y: 12.3 4 r^ U" Fe3+ peak height)K ">. P QR $(12.3sm -. Fe2+ ¨.3
$¯> Q $g Q X $) Fe3+ Fig. 2. The Calibration Curves - the magnitudes of the two
signals obtained from the Fe3+ standard solutions in the range of 1.00×10−6 M~8.00×10−4 M.
¨.36($: M1 M2, M2>M1) -. 5 .36 Ò ÇÓ peak height6 ">(x1 for M1, x2 for M2). (M1, x1) (M2, x2)K -. linear regression > # N BR>.
x={(x2-x1)S(M2-M1)}M+(x1M2-x2M1)S(M2-M1)
+ x" 12.3 4 0_L Fe2+ ÄP Fe3+sm v ÂÃ y·" Ò ÇÓ peak height
}, M 12.3sm -. Fe2+ ¨.3
$(", C)>. 12.3 4 My U
" Fe3+ %0_HøOySxZ100P, Fe3+
$"OFe2+ ¨.3 $(C)ZySxP, ` F} CU" Fe2+ $" OFe2+ ¨.3
$(C)-[Fe3+]P ³>. > Ê Ê Ë Sv QR 898 Gm Î º>. 1.07 Z10−4 M Fe2+ ¨.3 ©, 11c Â
1W Ò ÇÓ peak height" 0.530}, 7.84Z10−5 M 1.96Z10−4 M Fe3+ ¨.36
^X Ò ÇÓ peak height6 55 44.43
112.47[>. ~ (x1=44.43, M1=7.84Z10−5 M)
(x2=112.47, M2=1.96Z10−4 M) M=1.07Z10−4 M : N x.f 12.3 4 ÄÎ Fe2+ Fe3+
sm r" ÂÃ ur" 12.3 Ò Ç Ó peak þ(x)" 60.98m Av>. `Ún Ê 1 2.3 ^X Ò ÇÓ peak height" 0.530
4m 12.3 4 Fe3+ Hø 0.869%},
mÔ [Fe3+]=9.30Z10−7 M, [Fe2+]=9.907Z10−5 M g # '6 ^X>. Table 3 ÊT $6([Fe2+]
[Fe3+]) 86 ¥ ³ '6>. Fig.
3 B ÊË(Table 2)g 4.00Z10−5 M Fe2+
¨.3 -. ÊËK 2Lm 1c Â
~ > $ Fe2+ ¨.3 <"
Fe2+ 8$K ¯(} U>. @, 4.00×10−5 M Fe2+
¨.3 -. ÊË Âà >b P .36 -. ÊË6 + D 1c  ~
Fe2+ r" Â3 ¶¯+ : ;Uxsm S ÊË, ~ ã dataK y
e[>. Fig. 3 ~f Fe2+ " .3 (~0.14 M HNO3 .Ûm -.)6 ÂÃ $Q ^
|j 1c Ârf Fe2+ Q ïxs Table 3. The variations of [Fe2+] and [Fe3+] in the Fe2+ standard solutions as a function of time
[Fe2+]initial, M 1 hr 2 hrs 3 hrs 4 hrs 5 hrs 6 hrs 7 hrs
1.00×10−5 [Fe2+] 9.23E-6 9.19E-6 9.02E-6 8.87E-6 8.56E-6 8.12E-6 8.39E-6 [Fe3+] 8.06E-7 9.81E-7 1.13E-6 1.55E-6 1.88E-6 2.58E-6 3.88E-6
1.07×10−4 [Fe2+] 1.0607E-4 1.0468E-4 1.044E-4 1.0432E-4 1.037E-4 − 9.69E-5
[Fe3+] 9.30E-7 2.32E-6 2.60E-6 2.68E-6 3.30E-6 − 1.01E-5
[Fe2+]initial, M 8 hrs 9 hrs 10 hrs 11 hrs 12 hrs 13 hrs 14 hrs
1.00×10−5 [Fe2+] 6.12E-6 4.32E-6 2.27E-6 8.60E-7 1.70E-7 0 −
[Fe3+] 5.68E-6 7.73E-6 9.14E-6 9.83E-6 9.83E-6 1.00E-5 −
1.07×10−4 [Fe2+] 9.15E-5 7.93E-5 6.24E-5 3.53E-5 6.00E-6 1.00E-6 −
[Fe3+] 1.55E-5 2.77E-5 4.46E-5 7.17E-5 1.01E-4 1.06E-4 −
Fig. 3. The Oxidation of Fe2+ as a Function of Time.
m VF XSv>" -Ê U>. , Fe2+
ÀRK : ?$ ØK WR ¢">f, Fe2+ ¨.36 © 12~141c Â
f Ô) Fe2+ Fe3+sm X
¶ U>.
H2O2 Fe2+ (Fe2+ Fe3+) Fe3+ SCN−
Fe(SCN)x3+ ! " # $% &'(
%)*+, -. Fe2+ Fe3+ /0
" 12.3 4 5 89À, ;<=>. )*, ;? 6 89@A B C1 2 DEF(Fe2+ GH I Fe3+ G HJ)@AK LMN " +0 )*,6" OF P QR @A6 71 ST U>" VW Q X>. )*, Y8A" [Fe3+]=6.00Z10−7 M [>. Fe2+ " .3(~0.14 M HNO3
.Ûm -.)6 8 - Fe2+
ÀRK : ?$ ØK WR ¢">f, $
Q ^|j 1c Ârf Fe2+ Q ïxsm VF XSv>" -Ê U>. ,
.3 © 12~141c Âf Ô) Fe2+
Fe3+sm X ¶ U[>.
1. Banks, C. V.; Dale, J. M.; Melnick, I. M.; Musgrave, J.
R.; Onishi, H.; Shell, H. R. Treaties of Analytical Chem- istry, Academic Press, Part II, Vol. 2, John Wiley &
Sons, New York, 1962, 247-310.
2. Townsends, A. Encyclopedia of Analytical Science, Academic Press, New York, 1995, pp. 2369-2388.
3. Winoto-Morbach, S.; Tchikov, V.; Muller-Ruchholtz, W. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 1995, 9(1).
4. Hayashi, H.; Hira, Y.; Tanaka, T.; Hiraide, M. Bunseki Kagaku, 2001, 50(9), 631-634.
5. Moretto, U. P; Rudello, L. M.; Birriel, D.; Chevalet, E.
J. Electroanalysis, 2001, 13(8-9), 661-668.
6. Zenki, M.; Tanaka, S.; Iwadou, Y. Bunseki Kagaku, 2001, 50(5), 329-333.
7. Obata, H. Analytical Chemistry, 2001, 73(11), 2522-2528.
8. Rose, A. L.; Waite, T. D. Analytical Chemistry, 2001, 73(24), 5909-5920.
9. Liu, Z. D.; Hider, R. C. Medicinal Research Reviews, 2002, 22(1), 26-64.
10. Kolthoff, I. M.; Sandell, E. B.; Meehan, E. J.; Bruck- enstein, S. Quantitative Chemical Analysis, 4th. Ed., The MacMillan Company, New York, 1969.