• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Analysis on US NRC Regulatory Position for Blending Radioactive Waste

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Analysis on US NRC Regulatory Position for Blending Radioactive Waste"

Copied!
2
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

2019 ⦽ǎႊᔍᖒ⠱ʑྜྷ⦺⫭ ⇹ĥ⦺ᚁݡ⫭ םྙ᫵᧞Ḳ

213

Analysis on US NRC Regulatory Position for Blending Radioactive Waste

Jungjin Kim*, Jeheon Bang, Chan Woo Jeong, and Jinyong Park

Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, 62, Gwahak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea *

jjkim@kins.re.kr

1. Introduction

South Korea GLGQ¶W KDYH DQ\ UHJXODWRU\ requirements related with permission or prohibition about blending radioactive waste for reducing radioactive waste level. Recently, radioactive waste generators asked regulatory positions about blending. Therefore, this paper discussed and identified the main considerations for making technical guidelines through analyzing the Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation Branch Technical Position of US NRC.

2. US NRC Position for Blending Low-level

Radioactive Waste

2.1 Background

The US NRC(United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission) reviewed blending about mixing wastes of different concentrations to create a product with more uniform radionuclide concentrations. The different concentrations wastes mean high concentration LLW(Low Level radioactive Waste) and low concentration LLW. The blending was conducting for several reasons;

1) The integration of radioactive waste which is generated from a variety of sources in a NPP(Nuclear Power Plant) for operational efficiency

2) Reducing radiation exposure dose of radiation workers

3) To make lower waste class by averaging radioactive concentration.

Similarly, the blending in South Korea may be needed because lots of LLW and ILW(Intermediate Level radioactive Waste) were generating from same waste stream.

2.2 Blending policy

SECY-10-0043 report provided a variety options about blending policy. In those options, US NRC selected Risk-informed and Performance-based. In the two options, the regulatory agency position was based on the public health, safety, security and environmental protection. The main performance indicator was safe disposal of blended waste and additional details were considered;

1) Safely managing radioactive waste from human intrusion based on the 10 CFR 61.42 2) In accordance with 10 CFR 61.42, ensuring

public protection with site-specific performance analysis

3) Clarifying the regulatory position to all operators including radioactive waste generator

Therefore, regulatory staffs in South Korea need to consider similar principles as above.

3. Technical Basis for Blending Low-level

Radioactive Waste of US NRC

(2)

214

2019 ⦽ǎႊᔍᖒ⠱ʑྜྷ⦺⫭⇹ĥ⦺ᚁݡ⫭םྙ᫵᧞Ḳ

The US NRC allowed blending after conducting a review for the mixed waste in 2010. In the CA BTP (Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation Branch Technical Position, Rev1, the technical basis for blending was explained. The NRC staff evaluated results of intrusion into blendable waste using ³([SRVHG&XWWLQJV6FHQDULR´,QWKHH[SRVHGFXWWLQJV scenario, intrusion occurred at 100, 300 and 500 years after site closure for Class A, B and C, respectively. In addition, a variety detail exposure pathways (direct exposure from cuttings, vegetable/grain/fruit consumption from gardening and etc.) were considered. The most effective radionuclides for Class A and B waste were Cs-137. In case of Class C, the main radionuclides were C-14, Pu-241 and Am-241. Through these results, the revised CA BTP Table 1 values were calculated as below.

Table 1. Thresholds for demonstrating adequate blending [1] Characteristics of Most Concentrated Influent Waste Stream Volume of Mixture in m3 (ft3) Class A Mixture Class B Mixture Class C Mixture Sum of fractions less than 10

No limit No limit No limit Sum of fractions less than 10 and 20 No limit No limit 50(1800) Sum of fractions less than 20 and 30 60(2100) No limit 20(700) Sum of fractions less than 30 and 50 20(700) No limit 6(210) Sum of fractions less than 50 and 100 6(210) 40(1400) 2(70)

4. Conclusion

Currently, there is no certain regulatory requirements about blending radioactive waste in

South Korea. Therefore, blending can only be permitted if pre-disposal management is properly conducted and proved justification of blending. %DVHG RQ WKH 86 15&¶V &$ %73 WKH VSHFLILF blending technical guidelines of South Korea will be developed.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This work was supported by the Nuclear Safety Research Program through the Korea Foundation of Nuclear Safety(KoFONS), granted financial resource from the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission(NSSC), Republic of Korea (No.1703005). Regulatory points discussed here are WKHDXWKRUV¶RSLQLRQLQWKHSURFHVVRIUHVHDUch.

REFERENCES

>@ 86 15& ³&RQFHQWUDWLRQ $YHUDJLQJ DQG Encapsulation Branch Technical Position, 5HYLVLRQ´  

>@ 86 15& ³%OHQGLQJ RI /RZ-Level Radioactive :DVWH´6(&<-10-0043 (2010).

수치

Table 1. Thresholds for demonstrating adequate blending [1]  Characteristics  of Most  Concentrated  Influent Waste  Stream  Volume of Mixture in m 3  (ft 3 ) Class A Mixture Class B Mixture  Class C  Mixture  Sum of  fractions less  than 10

참조

관련 문서

 8-6 4개의 변수(Company, Date, Time, Price)에 대한 자료값들이 다 음과 같을 때, 이를 SAS 데이터셋으로 생성하고, Transpose 프로시 저를 이용하여

The index is calculated with the latest 5-year auction data of 400 selected Classic, Modern, and Contemporary Chinese painting artists from major auction houses..

Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.6.0 - 64bit Production With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options SQL&gt;

This study selected Korea University for South Korean university and the University of Pennsylvania and the University of Chicago, US for foreign

ANDRA, France’s radioactive waste management agency, has estimated the repository tunnels for the radioactive waste generated by its reprocessing and plutonium recycle

However, it is expected that in the case of biotech start-ups facing the Valley- of-Death, the shareholders’ equity value has a function of a growth option in real

It plays a central role in degradation of short-lived and regulatory proteins important in a variety of basic cellular processes, including regulation of the cell

♦ A foreign country may subsidize the export of a good that the US also exports, which will reduce its price in world markets and decrease the terms of trade for the US.