• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS AND HOUSING RIGHTS

문서에서 REGENERATION POLICY IN THE UK (페이지 103-116)

• Focus on Urban Redevelopment in South Korea

• Concept definitions and three case studies

• Report prepared by Mun Su Park

Questions for the Research

• Who felt unfairly treated and why?

• How did the government react?

• How did the lack of a legal definition of

housing rights hinder arbitration?

Assumptions of the Research

• There is a need to actively promote local community in large cities

• Urban redevelopment in South Korea should take place in the democratic arena of negotiation

• To facilitate arbitration there should be a legal framework for housing rights and fairness in urban redevelopment

projects

Local community:

a sociological definition

• Local community is the sense of identity that at least some of the residents of a given area maintain among themselves through cooperation and intentional action.

• Local community is not a geographical unit

• Local community is both myth and

reality

Features of local community listed in the Habitat Agenda

• Generates a sense of citizenship and identity

• Cooperation and dialogue for the common good

• Spirit of voluntarism and civic engagement

• All people are encouraged and have an equal opportunity to participate in

decision-making and development

Citizen participation model in the

“arena of consensus” –John Abbott

• Local government, NGOs, professionals support local community organizations

• Intervention for empowerment:

information gathering, training &

education, mediation, facilitation, conflict resolution

• Importance of projects and project

management

Neighborhood self-management model– Hillel Schmid

• An ideology of administrative and political decentralization

• Important role of nonprofit org. in

providing social and communal services

• Promotion of neighborhood organizations

• The community council as a merger of neighborhood self-management and community centers

Housing rights as expressed by the Habitat Agenda

• An obligation of Governments to enable people to obtain shelter and to protect and improve dwellings and neighborhoods

• Adequate shelter for everyone

• “Adequate” means healthy, safe, secure, accessible and affordable

• including basic services, facilities, freedom

from discrimination, legal security of tenure

Fairness in a public project in the

“arena of consensus”

• The opportunity for all whose interests are affected by the project

• to participate equally

• in the negotiated outcomes of the project

Conflict issues in Songnim-dong

• Selling and moving out versus remaining and investing

• Lack of transparency in the

homeowners ’ association

Local community in Songnim-dong

• Neither strong nor weak prior to redevelopment

• An ideal proposed by a religious leader

• The idea that local residents themselves should take financial responsibility for development and enjoy its benefits

• An extended struggle led residents to opt to sell and move out

Role of the community organizer in Songnim-dong

• He participated as a homeowner in the homeowners ’ association

• Formed a network with other organizers

for publicity, planning, education, and

advocacy

Arbitration in Songnim-dong

• Government role mainly passive, granting permission

• Developer’s role proactive, seeking profit

• Lawsuits filed, moving arbitration to the courts

• Delay in court decisions led both sides in the conflict to ‘cut their losses’

Conflict over compensation in Yongdu-dong

• Official evaluation much less than market value

• Compensation insufficient to allow alternative housing for many residents

• The problem of unregistered property

Yongdu-dong: role of nonprofit org. and professionals

• Nonprofit org. responded to the unfairness of forced evictions

• They advised residents on strategy and they increased public concern

• Professionals helped negotiate a compromise

Yongdu-dong: role of Korean Housing Authority

• KHA’s options were limited by the requirement to get returns on housing investment

• They ignored housing rights and used violent eviction methods, instigating a long struggle by the residents

• Maintained an unfair advantage in

negotiations by refusing to reveal actual

construction costs

Arbitration in Yongdu-dong

• KHA took a rigid stance in negotiations

• Non-profit organizations softened residents ’ demands by stressing ‘the

right to livelihood ’

• Experts intervened suggesting the compromise solution of providing

compensation through the illegal selling of purchasing rights

Muak-dong: demand for on-site temporary housing

• To avoid hardship imposed by

temporary move to a different district

• Opportunity to strengthen local community

• Pressure the government to keep its

promise to provide public rental housing

Arbitration in Muak-dong

• Seoul city would not allow on-site temporary housing to renters, only to homeowners

• A violent attack on renters hospitalized 21 of them, instigating a sit-in at the local government ( ‘Jongno-gu’) office

• Jongno-gu brought an end to the sit-in by agreeing to overlook the illegality of on-site temporary housing

Causes of ‘community fatigue’ in Muak-dong

• Two years of living under constant stress and threats of violence

• Inadequate response to the spread of false rumors and faction formation

• Belief that community organizers had exaggerated the need for struggle

• Tensions from high-density living

Community rebuilding in public rental housing

• Community Chest of Korea project

sponsored welfare networks and funded community organizers

• Salient issues, such as the need for a senior citizens’ meeting place

• Legal status of the renters’

representative association made community building less stressful

Obstacles to promoting local community in urban

redevelopment

• Expectation of windfall profits

• Lack of recognition of the housing rights of renters

• Extended time-frame that puts hardship especially on low-income households

• Too little financing from local residents

and from the public sector

Aids to negotiation and arbitration in urban

redevelopment

• A legal framework that

• allows a win-win outcome among affected persons

• defines the common good clearly

• Assures fair participation in negotiation for all affected persons

• Specifies arbiters for speedy and

professional arbitration

PRIVATE SECTOR HOUSING RENEWAL IN

문서에서 REGENERATION POLICY IN THE UK (페이지 103-116)