정보환경 개선방안도 구체적으로 나올 수 있다. 연구의 깊이에 한계가 있는 것이다.
참고문헌
한국정보화진흥원, (3).
최희윤. 2006. 지식생태학 관점에서 본 도서관의 지식관리 모형 연구.
한국문헌정보학회지, 40(1), 397-416.
한국정보화진흥원. 2011. 5. 30. IT & Future Strategy: 미래정부를 위한 지식플랫폼 구축방향, 제3호
학습백과 ZUM, “생태계의 구성”, http://study.zum.com/book/13423, (2019.09.27) 학습백과 ZUM, “생태계와 도시 기후”, http://study.zum.com/book/13107,
(2019.09.27)
한세억. 2006. 행정학 연구내용의 적실성 소고: 행정학의 정체성 재인식과 지향.
한국행정학회 학술발표논문집, 57-71.
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. 2001. Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS quarterly, 107-136.
Annanperä, E., Liukkunen, K., & Markkula, J. 2016. Managing Emerging Business Ecosystems - A Knowledge Management Viewpoint. 7p.
Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R. 2003. Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes.
Management science, 49(4), 571-582.
Big Dog & Little Dog`s Performance Juxtaposition, “Knowledge Typology Map”, http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/knowledge/knowledge_typology .html, (2019.09.27.)
Chen, D. N., Liang, T. P., & Lin, B. 2010. An ecological model for organizational knowledge management. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50(3), 11-22.
Faber, A., Riemhofer, M., Rehm, S. V., & Bondel, G. 2019. A Systematic Mapping Study on Business Ecosystem Types. Twenty-fifth Americas Conference on Information Systems. 7p.
Varun Grover, T. H. D. 2001. General perspectives on knowledge management:
Fostering a research agenda. Journal of management information systems, 18(1), 5-21.
InSlideshare, “Knowledge ecosystem approach”, https://www.slideshare.
net/Co-Capacity/knowledge-ecosystem-approach, (2019.09.27)
Jarrahi, M. H., Philips, G., Sutherland, W., Sawyer, S., & Erickson, I. 2019.
Personalization of Knowledge, Personal Knowledge Ecology, and Digital Nomadism. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(4), 313-324.
McCarthy, G. M., & MacDonald, J. K. 1996. Gender differences in
characteristics, infection control practices, knowledge and attitudes related to HIV among Ontario dentists. Community dentistry and oral epidemiology, 24(6), 412-415.
Onorati, T., Isenberg, P., Bezerianos, A., Pietriga, E., & Diaz, P. 2015.
WallTweet: A Knowledge Ecosystem for Supporting Situation Awareness.
Schultze, U., & Leidner, D. E. 2002. Studying knowledge management in information systems research: discourses and theoretical assumptions. MIS quarterly, 213-242.
Wenger, E. 2001. Communities of practice: Best practices. Community Intelligence Labs.
SUMMARY
Information Environment Improvement Plan for Land Knowledge Ecosystem Activation
Daejong Kim, Dongkun Kim, Seung Man An, Ryunghyeok Im, Jung Hyun Song, Jeong Ki Park, Sang Kyu Kim, Soowook Lee
Key words: knowledge ecosystem, collaboration network analysis, open platform.
The goal of this study is to identify how we can improve computing environment for facilitating territorial knowledge ecosystem. Knowledge ecosystem is a conceptual framework that describe how knowledge can be created from data to solve territorial problems. Knowledge ecosystem has been studied as a subject since information technologies began to change knowledge creation process.
Knowledge ecosystem is composed of producers who produce data using various technologies, 1st consumers or knowledge producers (researchers) using those data and 2nd consumers (government, company and people) who are applying produced knowledge into territorial domain.
Two approaches have been made for deep and narrow-down investigation on knowledge ecosystem focused on KRIHS, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, which has been leading knowledge creation in territorial domain.
One is computing environment that is supposed to help knowledge creation process. This has been investigated by interviewing staffs and users. The other is interaction among researchers who are producing knowledge using data and
tools in collaboration with others. Collaboration networks were analyzed for the year of 2016, 2017 and 2018 based on all research projects. Relationship between knowledge producers and consumer was visualized using network graph based on all the projects that are practiced by request from demanders.
The investigation and data analysis results suggest some directions for facilitating the territorial knowledge ecosystem. First, we need to diversify production elements including researchers’ domain, data and tools, and knowledge product format. Second, we need to establish a data lake that produced data in various agencies and companies flow in in real time if possible so that knowledge creators can get necessary data as soon as possible. Third, analytical model and programming code should be shared along with data. Fourth, collaboration and competition should be balanced to create positive feedback and motivation.
Finally, relationship between knowledge producer and consumer should be rearranged to make the knowledge ecosystem facilitated by making knowledge asset shared.
Four suggestions to improve computing environment are identified to facilitate knowledge ecosystem. First, an open platform should be established to provide necessary data and tools for collaborative data processing, visualization and analytics. Second, real-time networking process should be given to researchers to understand where he/she is, and whom they can collaborate with. Third, all data should be processed and produced for integration based on standardized time-stamp, geotag and identifier of researcher and research project. Lastly, incentives need to be given to best practices based on its value as a knowledge asset and outcome/impact on national territory and people.
수시 19-02
국토지식생태계 활성화를 위한 정보환경 개선방안
연 구 진 김대종, 김동근, 안승만, 임륭혁, 송정현, 박정기, 김상규, 이수욱, 김근채 발 행 인 강현수
발 행 처 국토연구원
출판등록 제2017-9호
인 쇄 2019년 8월 28일 발 행 2019년 8월 31일
주 소 세종특별자치시 국책연구원로 5 전 화 044-960-0114
팩 스 044-211-4760 가 격 비매품
I S B N 979-11-5898-452-6 홈페이지 http://www.krihs.re.kr
Ⓒ 2019, 국토연구원
이 연구보고서를 인용하실 때는 다음과 같은 사항을 기재해주십시오.
김대종, 김동근, 안승만, 임륭혁, 송정현, 박정기, 김상규, 이수욱, 김근채. 2019. 국토지식생태계 활성화를 위한 정보환경 개선방안. 세종: 국토연구원.
이 연구보고서의 내용은 국토연구원의 자체 연구물로서 정부의 정책이나 견해와는 상관없습니다.
이 연구보고서는 한국출판인협회에서 제공한 KoPub 서체와 대한인쇄문화협회가 제공한 바른바탕체 등이 적용되어 있습니다.
국토지식생태계 활성화를 위한 정보환경 개선방안
Information Environment Improvement Plan for Land Knowledge Ecosystem Activation
제1장 연구의 개요
제2장 국토지식생태계의 개념과 이론 제3장 국토지식생태계와 정보환경 사례분석
제4장 국토지식생태계 활성화를 위한 정보환경 개선방안 제5장 결론
비매품/무료