• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

1. 강명구. 2006. 한국 웹 아카이브 구축 방안. 디지털 아카이브 워크샵.

2. 김홍렬. 2003. 과학기술문헌의 인용분석 연구.

한국정보관리학회지 20(4): 1-21.

3. 김희정. 2003. 디지털 아카이빙 최근 연구동향 및 OAIS 참조모형에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지 3(1): 23-42.

4. 김희정. 2003. 전자저널 아카이빙을 위한 OAIS 참조모형의 적용방안에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지 3(2): 113-139.

5. 대한민국 한국정보문화진흥원.2006. 지식정보자원관리사업 투자효과분석과 장기발전방안. 서울: 한국정보문화진흥원 6. 서은경. 2004. 디지털 아카이브의 영구적 보존을 위한 개념적

모형 설계에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지 38(1):

13-7. 이란주,황신혜. 2003. 전자저널의 관리 및 서비스에 관한 연구.

도서관 58(2): 3-40.

8. 이소연. 2002. 디지털 아카이빙의 표준화와 OAIS 참조모형.

정보관리연구 33(3): 45-68

9. 윤중현. 2002. 정보자원 활용도 영향요인들에 관한 연구.

정보관리학회지 19(2) : 31-48.

10. 신은자. 2001. 전자저널의 아카이빙에 관한 연구.

정보관리학회지 18(3) :139-157.

11. 최원태, 최인숙. 2003. 효율적인 학술정보 유통을 위한 유관기관간 역할분담에 관한 연구. 서울: 교육인적자원부.

12. 한복희. 2003. 지식기반사회에서 이용자연구의 최신동향.

한국문헌정보학회지 37(4) :295-310.

13. 한혜영. 2004. 해외학술 전자정보 구독현황 분석 및 주요 시사점. 국회도서관보 41(4) : 40-49

14. 황옥경. 2004. 전자저널 라이선스 계약모델에 관한 연구.

한국문헌정보학회지 38(1): 199-228.

15. B.F.Lavoie. 2003. The Incentives to Preserve Digital Materials. Office of Research, OCLC Inc.,

16. Andrew. W,. 2000. Proposal for a Study of electrnic Journal Archiving. Mellon Foundation

17. A. Okerson. 2002. YEA: The Yale Electronic Archive, One Year of Progress: Report on the Digital Preservation Planning Project.

18. Bide, M.. 2000. Standards for Electronic Publishing: An Overview. NEDLIB.

19. CEDARS Guide to Preservation Metadata. 2002. CEDARS Project.

http://www.leeds.ac.uk/cedars/guideto/metadata/guidetom etadata.pdf (accessed July 9, 2008)

20. Donald, w., and Garrett, John. 1996. Preserving Digital Information- Report of the Task Force on Archiving of Digital Information. Washington: The Commission on Preservation and Access & The Research Libraries Group.

http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/E RICServlet?accno=ED395602 (accessed March 15, 2008)

21. EBSCO.2006. Five Year Journal Price Increase History (2001 - 2005).

http://www-us.ebsco.com/home/printsubs/priceoverview.pd f (accessed July 9, 2008)

22. Harvard Uni. 2002. Report on the planning Year Grant for the design of an E-Journal Archive. Library Mellon Project Steering Committee.

23. Infrastructure and Preservation Program. Washington: U.S.

Library of Congress.

24. Inera Inc. 2001. E-journal Archive DTD Feasibility Study.

Harvard University Library.

http://www.diglib.org/preserve/hadtdfs.pdf (accessed July 9, 2008)

25. J. Rothenberg. 2002. Digital Preservation : The State of the Art 26. Laura Campbell. 2003. Preserving Our Digital Heritage:

Plan for the National Digital Information

27. Noerr, Peter. 2003. The digital library toolkit. Ca: Sun Microsystems.

28. National Library of Australia. Logical Data Model. 1999.

Canberra: NLA. http://www.nla.gov.au/dsp/rft/model.doc (accessed July 9, 2008)

29. Lupovici, C., and J. Masanes. 2000. Metadata for the Long Term Preservation of electronic Publications-NEDLIB report 30. Lupovici, C. and Masane` s, J. (2000), Metadata for the

Long-term Preservation of Electronic Publications, NEDLIB Report. Koninklijke Bibliotheek, The Hague.

www.kb.nl/coop/nedlib/results/NEDLIBmetadata.pdf (accessed July 9, 2008)

31. National Library of Australia. 2002. NLA electronic

Information Resource Strategies & Action Plan 2002-2003.

Canberra: NLA.

http://www.nla.gov.au/policy/electronic/resourceplan2002.ht ml (accessed March 15, 2008)

32. OCLC/RLG Working roup. 2002. Preservation Metadata &

the OAIS Information Model.

http://www.rlg.org/en/pdfs/pm_framework.pdf (accessed March 15, 2008)

33. OCLC/RLG Working Group. 2001. Preservation Metadata for Digital Object - A Review of the state of the Art.

www.oclc.org/research/pmwg/presmeta_wp.pdf (accessed March 15, 2008)

34. Owen, J. M., and M.Coutts. 2001. CEDARS Summative Evaluation: Final Report. CEDARS Project.

http://www.leeds.ac.uk/cedars/admin/sumeval.doc (accessed July 9, 2008)

35. Peccia, Nestor. Reference Model for an Open Arhival Information System.2002. CCSDS.

36. Pandora Business Process Model,

http://pandora.nla.gov.au/#obje (accessed March 15, 2008) 37. Research Libraries Group.2002. Trusted Digital Repositories

- Attributes and Responsibility. California: Mountain

Viewhttp://www.library.yale.edu/~okerson/yea/ (accessed July 9, 2008)

38. Sun Microsystems. 2003. Digital Asset Management Infrastructure Reference Architecture. CA: Sun Microsystems.

39. SUN microsystems. Enterprise Digital Asset Management Reference Architecture. 2003. CA: SUN microsystems.

40. The CEDARS Project Team. 2001. The CEDARS Project Report (April 1998 - March 2001).

http://www.leeds.ac.uk/cedars/admin/CedarsProjectReportT oMar01.pdf (accessed March 15, 2008)

41. Weinberger, E., and K. Russel. 2000. Cost Elements of Digital Preservation.

http://www.leeds.ac.uk/cedars/colman/CIW01r.html (accessed July 9, 2008)

제 Ⅶ 장

관련 문서