• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

by Community Type, Sector,

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "by Community Type, Sector,"

Copied!
2
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION NCES 2018-063 APRIL 2018

Services to Support Parent Involvement by Community Type, Sector, and School Classification

The Principal Questionnaire was administered as part of the 2011–12 Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS), which is a nationally representative sample survey of public and private K–12 schools, principals, and teachers in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. The selected samples include about 11,000 traditional and charter public schools and public school principals, and 3,000 private schools and their principals. This Data Point examines the relationship between services to support parent involvement, and community type, school sector, and school classification.1

What is the relationship between community type and availability of services to support parent involvement?

Public and private school principals were asked to report whether their school had a staff member assigned to work on parent involvement; workshops or courses for parents or guardians; services to support parent participation such as providing child care or transportation; or a parent drop-in center or lounge.

Overall, higher percentages of principals reported having a staff member assigned

to work on parent involvement (51 per- cent) and workshops available for parents (53 percent) than on drop-in centers for parents (17 percent) (figure 1).

Higher percentages of principals in city schools reported having a staff member assigned to work on parent involvement (63 percent), workshops for parents (67 percent), services to support parent involvement (51 percent), and drop-in centers for parents (26 percent) than other community types.

Compared to suburban schools, rural schools had lower percentages of

principals who reported assigning a staff member to parent involvement (51 and 44 percent, respectively), having services for parents (42 and 31 percent), and offering a drop-in center for parents (17 and 11 percent).

There were differences across all community types in reports of workshops. The largest percentage of principals to report offering workshops for parents were those from city schools (67 percent), followed by principals from suburban schools (59 percent), town schools (46 percent), and rural schools (40 percent).

FIGURE 1. Services to support parent involvement, by community type: 2011–2012

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS), “Public School Principal and Private School Principal Data Files,” 201112.

Data in this report are from the 201112 Schools and Staffing Survey. To learn more, visit www.nces.ed.gov/surveys/sass. For questions about content or to download additional copies, go to http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.

51

63

51

45 44

53

67

59

46

40 40

51

42

36

31

17

26

17

11 11

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Total City Suburb Town Rural

Percent

Community Type

School has staff member assigned to work on parent involvement

School holds workshops for parents

School offers services for parents to support parent involvement

School has drop-in center for parents

(2)

Services to Support Parent Involvement by Community Type, Sector, and School Classification

FIGURE 2. Services to Support Parent Involvement, by School Sector and Classification:

! Interpret data with caution. Estimate is unstable due to high coefficient of variation.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS), “Public School Principal and Private School Principal Data Files,” 201112.

What is the relationship be- tween school classification by sector and services to support parent involvement?

Overall, higher percentages of all public school principals reported having a staff member assigned to work on parent involvement (55 percent), workshops for parents (57 percent), and a drop-in center for parents (18 percent) than all private school principals (38, 40, and 12 percent, respectively) (figure 2).

A higher percentage of charter school principals reported having a staff member assigned to work on parent involvement (68 percent) than principals

at traditional public schools (54 percent).

Comparing across types of private schools, higher percentages of principals in nonsectarian schools reported having a staff member for parent involvement (49 percent), workshops (56 percent), and drop-in centers (19 percent) than principals in Catholic or other religious schools (33 and 35 percent, 44 and 29 percent, and 5 and 11 percent, respectively).

A lower percentage of principals in Catholic schools (5 percent) reported having drop-in centers than principals at other religious schools (11 percent), while a higher percentage reported

having workshops available to parents (44 and 29 percent, respectively).

Endnotes

1 Community type is defined by the urban- centric school locale code based on the 2010 Decennial Census data, collapsed into four categories: city, suburban, town, and rural.

School sector refers to whether a school is a public school or a private school. School classification refers to characteristics within a sector, in particular, whether a public school is a traditional public school or a charter school, or whether a private school is a Catholic school, affiliated with another religion, or nonsectarian.

51 55

68

54

38

33 35

53 57 61 49

57

40 44

29

56

40 40 43

40 40 43

35

46

17 18 21

18

12

5

11

19

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Total Total Charter school Traditional public

Total Catholic Other religious Nonsectarian

School Classification by Sector

School has staff member assigned to work on parent involvement School holds workshops for parents

School offers services for parents to support parent involvement School has drop-in center for parents

Percent

!

This National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) Data Point presents information on education topics of current interest. It was authored by Abigail Quirk of the American Institutes for Research. Estimates based on samples are subject to sampling variability, and apparent differences may not be statistically

significant. All stated differences are statistically significant at the .05 level. In the design, conduct, and data processing of NCES surveys, efforts are made to minimize effects of nonsampling errors, such as item response, measurement error, data processing error, or other systematic error.

참조

관련 문서

A circle graph shows how the budget of a certain company was spent: 63 percent for salaries, 12 percent for research and development, 6 percent for utilities, 5 percent

The gross saving ratio (gross saving/gross national disposable income) increased from 30.8 percent in the first quarter to 31.7 percent in the second. The gross domestic

Real gross domestic product (chained volume measure of GDP) increased by 1.4 percent in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the previous quarter.. On the expenditure

The construction sector turned to positive growth of 0.4 percent over the quarter, owing to the increase in civil engineering that offset sluggishness in

On the production side, the manufacturing sector decreased 3.2 percent, which was mainly due to the declines in transport equipment and general machinery

Consistent growth of domestic sales and solid outbound shipments led to a 10.3 percent year-on-year increase in production to 374,014 vehicles.. Sales of imported

Forty percent of the subsidies are focused on housing and buildings for social support (basic health, education, and related human capital improvements), while the 29

미래 이자율이 하락할 것으로 예상된다면 투자자는 듀레이션을 증 가시키는 방향으로 포트폴리오를 재구성하고 미래이자율이 상승할 것으로 예상되면