• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Comparison of Disk Tension Infiltrometer and van Genuchten-Mualem Model on Estimation of Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Comparison of Disk Tension Infiltrometer and van Genuchten-Mualem Model on Estimation of Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity"

Copied!
9
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

((D Diisskk TTeennssiioonn IInnffiillttrroom meetteerr)) vvaann G Geennuucchhtteenn--M Muuaalleem m

Comparison of Disk Tension Infiltrometer and van Genuchten-Mualem Model on Estimation of Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity

*· · · · 1

Seung-Oh Hur*, Kang-Ho Jung, Chan-Won Park, Sang-Keun Ha and Geong-Gyu Kim1

, 1

Soil Management Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science & Technology, RDA, Suwon 441-707, Korea

1Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea

Hydraulic conductivity is the rate of water flux on hydraulic gradient. The van Genuchten Mualem (VGM) model is frequently used for describing unsaturated state of soils, that is composed with the function of soil water potential and soil water content and requests various parameters. This study is to get the value of VGM parameters used Rosetta computer program based on neural network analysis method and to calculate VGM parameters. VGM parameters included Ko(effective saturated hydraulic conductivity), θr(residual soil water content), θs(saturated soil water content), L, n and m. The unsaturated hydraulic conductivity at 10 kPa was calculated by using Rosetta program. Unsaturated hydraulic conductivities of 17 soil series at 1, 3, 5, 7 kPa were also obtained by applying saturated hydraulic conductivity by disk tension infiltrometer based on Gardner and Wooding's equation. Water flow at the water potential of 3 kPa was very low except Namgye, Hagog, Baegsan, Sangju, Seogcheon, Yesan soil series. Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity at 1 kPa showed the highest value for Samgag soil series and was in order of Yesan, Hwabong, Hagog and Baegsan soil series. Those of Gacheon, Seocheon and Ugog soil series were very low. When the value by VGM was compared with the value by disc tension infiltrometer, there was a tendency with exponential function to soils without gravel but there was no tendency to soils including gravel. Conclusively, it would be limited that VGM model for unsaturated hydraulic conductivity analysis applies to Korean agricultural land including gravel and having steep slope, shallow soil depth.

Key words : Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity, Disk Tension Infiltrometer, van Genuchten Mualem Model, Rosetta Program, Gardner-Wooding Equation

50%

. ,

.

(saturated hydraulic conductivity) ,

(unsaturated hydraulic conductivity) .

. ,

,

(water balance)

.

. ,

, : 2006. 7. 18 : 2006. 9. 16 ,

* : Phone: +82312900273, E-mail: [email protected]

(2)

(Warrick, 2002).

Jung et al.(1980)

, , 3

, Park and Yoo(1982)

inverse auger hole . Ro and Yoo(1984) pressure plate extractor

.

,

, Jung et al.(1981) Ro and Yoo(1984)

. ,

. Double ring (Jung et al., 1981),

(Ankeny et al.,1988; Hussen and Warrick, 1993; Logsdon and Jaynes, 1993; Schwartz and Evett, 2002).

, .

, van Genuchten Mualem

(VGM) . VGM

. ,

, VGM

VGM .

( , 2000)

. ,

, double ring

.

,

, 17

. Fig. 1

20 cm water

reservoir 5.1 cm, 81 cm ,

bubble tower 2.54 cm,

bubble membrane 30

cm .

membrane ring

ring (fine

white silica sand) .

. membrane

ring

. membrane

. (3, 6, 12 cm)

bubble tower , water reservoir

.

Wooding(1968) ,

(steady state flow) Fig. 1. Disc tension infiltrometer.

(3)

.

, Q [L3T-1] ,

r disc (L) , Kwet

potential [LT-1] λc

(L) .

(Lien, 1989; Ankeny et al., 1991; Hussen, 1991;

Reynolds and Elrick, 1991), (2) Gardner(1958) .

K = Ksexp(αh) (2)

, K [LT-1] , Ks

[LT-1] , h [L]

α λc-1 [L-1] .

, (1) Kwet (2) K

(1) (3) .

n

Ks α

. 2 (3)

α ,

3

,

3 cm, 6 cm, 12 cm .

VGM

, (4)

van Genuchten(1980)

(5) Mualem(1976)

,

( (6)).

, Φ , θ

, θr 1500kPa , θs

, α, n, m

α

cm-1 n

m 1-1/n .

, K(θ) , L

, h(θ)

(6) VGM

.

. (USDA-ARS)

. , VGM

Rosetta(Schaap and Bouten, 1996; Schaap et al.,

1998) . Rosetta

(neural network) , , 33kPa, 1500kPa

VGM Ko(effective

saturated hydraulic conductivity), θr(residual soil water content), θs(saturated soil water content), L, n, m

(USDA-ARS) . Rosetta

Rumelhart et al.(1986) "Parallel Distributed Processing"

(feed-forward back propagation)

,

. (input layer) (output layer) (hidden layer)

, , ,

Rosetta 2085

. c

Q = πr2Kwet [1+ ] (1) πr

θ- θr

K(θ) = Ks [ ]L (5)

θs - θr

Q = πr2Ksexp(αh) [1+ ] (3)4 παr

θ- θr 1

Φ = = [ ]m (4) θs - θr 1+(αΨm)n

θ- θr θ- θr

K(θ) = Ks [ ]L [ 1- [ 1- ( ) ]m]2 (6) θs - θr θs - θr

0θh(θ) 2 0

θs

h(θ)

m1

(4)

VGM

(Table 1).

Pedo-Trnasfer

pedo-transfer function(PTF)

.

PTF

(Cornelis et al., 2001). (7) (8) PTF

(1995)

. ,

10kPa 1500kPa

. (7) (8) PTF

. PTF 0.85(P<0.01) 1:1 line

(1995) .

Gardner

Wooding (3)

.

17 , 6

10

. 1,000 cm

potential 100 kPa 10,

30, 50, 70 cm 1, 3, 5, 7 kPa

, potential

Table 2 . potential 3 kPa

6 1.0×10-7 cm·sec-1

11

. 5 kPa 4

13 , 7 kPa

1.0×10-77 cm·day-1 . ,

,

7 kPa Soil Series

Gacheon Gocheon Namgye Chilgog Haggog Hoigog Baegsan Sangju Seogcheon Suam Anryong Yesan Ugog Jigog Pungcheon Hwabong Samgag

1.7 1.7 2.6 1.6 1.0 2.3 2.0 0.8 2.5 1.6 1.5 0.5 1.8 1.4 2.6 0.8 3.0

53.1 51.0 69.9 58.5 70.1 39.7 53.6 77.8 17.4 74.8 70.0 49.6 41.4 77.0 46.4 83.6 71.2

34.2 35.0 21.7 29.2 23.9 34.1 32.1 13.0 64.9 19.7 24.5 35.1 42.3 16.0 40.7 10.0 18.0

12.7 14.0 8.4 12.3 6.0 26.2 14.3 9.2 17.7 5.5 5.5 15.3 16.3 7.0 12.9

6.4 10.8

L L SL SL SL L SL SL SiL SL SL L L SL

L LS SL Soil Texture Clay

Silt Sand

OM

--- % --- Table 1. Soil characteristics for application to Rosetta program.

θ10kPα= 26.8 - 3.99ln(S)+2.36 Si+2.88(OM) (7) θ1500kPα= 15.75 - 2.86ln(S)+0.55 Si+0.7(OM) (8)

(5)

. , 1

kPa 40.8×10-5 cm·sec-

1 , ,

, .

1 kPa .

VGM VGM

, (6)

. Rosetta

. , Rosetta

1500kPa θr

3.4% 7.2%

, θs

Soil Series

Gacheon Gocheon Namgye Chilgog Haggog Hoigog Baegsan Sangju Seogcheon Suam Anryong Yesan Ugog Jigog Pungcheon Hwabong Samgag

Paddy Land

Upland

Forest

2.8×10-4 6.3×10-4 1.8×10-4 2.7×10-4 5.1×10-4 8.8×10-4 5.3×10-4 5.8×10-4 0.3×10-4 68.1×10-4 15.7×10-4 14.0×10-4 2.7×10-4 5.2×10-4 12.3×10-4 65.3×10-4 132.2×10-4

0.37 0.34 0.13 0.27 0.13 0.26 0.15 0.17 0.13 0.64 0.37 0.22 0.35 0.34 0.30 0.38 0.35

0.7×10-5 2.0×10-5 4.7×10-5 1.8×10-5 13.9×10-5 6.8×10-5 11.9×10-5 10.7×10-5 1.0×10-5 1.1×10-5 3.9×10-5 15.7×10-5 0.8×10-5 1.3×10-5 5.8×10-5 14.5×10-5 40.8×10-5

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7 3.2×10-6 0.1×10-6 10.5×10-6 0.4×10-6 6.0×10-6 3.7×10-6 0.7×10-6

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7 2.0×10-6

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7 0.1×10-6 0.1×10-6 0.4×10-6

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7 2.2×10-7

<1.0×10-7 7.9×10-7

<1.0×10-7 3.0×10-7 1.3×10-7

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-8

<1.0×10-8 1.5×10-8

<1.0×10-8 5.9×10-8

<1.0×10-8 1.5×10-8

<1.0×10-8

<1.0×10-8

<1.0×10-8

<1.0×10-8

<1.0×10-8

<1.0×10-8

<1.0×10-8

<1.0×10-8

<1.0×10-8

<1.0×10-8 7 kPa 5 kPa

3 kPa 1 kPa

Ks α

cm·sec-1 cm-1 --- cm·sec-1--- Land Use

Table 2. Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity estimated by disc tension infiltrometer.

Soil Series

Gacheon Gocheon Namgye Chilgog Haggog Hoigog Baegsan Sangju Seogcheon Suam Anryong Yesan Ugog Jigog Pungcheon Hwabong Samgag

0.0472 0.0500 0.0395 0.0459 0.0352 0.0723 0.0503 0.0454 0.0673 0.0362 0.0340 0.0528 0.0558 0.0405 0.0484 0.0457 0.0445

0.3898 0.3914 0.3863 0.3875 0.3895 0.4163 0.3901 0.3813 0.4370 0.3886 0.3906 0.3929 0.3999 0.3850 0.3940 0.3811 0.3833

0.0171 0.0155 0.0359 0.0230 0.0379 0.0130 0.0182 0.0367 0.0047 0.0416 0.0385 0.0146 0.0089 0.0398 0.0109 0.0371 0.0350

1.4328 1.4418 1.4342 1.4041 1.4451 1.4279 1.4213 1.5631 1.6626 1.5230 1.4474 1.4461 1.5198 1.5635 1.4925 1.8634 1.4338

0.9×10-4 0.8×10-4 2.6×10-4 1.3×10-4 3.0×10-4 0.5×10-4 0.9×10-4 2.7×10-4 0.2×10-4 3.6×10-4 3.1×10-4 0.7×10-4 0.4×10-4 3.3×10-4 0.5×10-4 3.2×10-4 2.3×10-4

-0.6324 -0.5696 -1.1018 -0.9120 -1.0589 -0.6051 -0.7366 -1.0084 0.3642 -1.0061 -1.0486 -0.5466 -0.1032 -0.9903 -0.2082 -0.8685 -1.1481

0.3020891 0.3064145 0.3027316 0.2878032 0.3080097 0.2996744 0.2964418 0.3602652 0.3985493 0.3434013 0.3091242 0.3084876 0.3420392 0.3604125 0.3299611 0.463339 0.302571 m=1-1/n L

Ko

α n Θ_s

(cm3·cm3-1)

(cm3·cm3-1) cm-1 cm·sec-1

Θ_r

Table 3. VGM(van Genuchten Mualem) parameters by Rosetta.

(6)

38.1%

43.7% .

Ko 0.2×

10-4 cm·day-1 3.6×10-4 cm·day-1 .

.

L ,

n

1.8634 1.4041 .

α 0.0047

0.0416 (Table 3).

Rosetta (Givi et al., 2004)

VGM

. Fig. 2

(1995) 1500 kPa

PTF( (7))

Rosetta r)

, Warrick(2002)

θr 1500 kPa

. , 0.8851

, 0.6657

. , Rosetta

. Rosetta

, (4)

van Genuchten (VG)

. (4)

, .

PTF

(4) .

Fig. 3 10kPa (1995)

PTF( (8)) (4)

. (1995)

PTF VG 1:1

VG

, (1995) PTF

10 kPa( (7)) 1500 kPa( (8)) .

Fig. 2. Comparison of Rosetta parameters and PTF.

Fig. 3. Comparison of soil water content by estimated VG model and PTF.

(7)

Rosetta VG

, (6) VGM

.

10kPa PTF

(6) (4) VG

(6) (Table 4), VG

VGM

, PTF VGM

VG ,

( , , , )

.

VGM .

Gardner (2)

.

. VGM

VGM Gardner

. Gardner

Table 1 ,

VGM

. Table 5

Gardner VGM 1, 3,

10 kPa .

(2) Gardner 3 kPa

Soil Series

--- cm·sec-1---

Pedo-Transfer Function

Van Genuchten Gacheon Gocheon Namgye Chilgog Haggog Hoigog Baegsan Sangju Seogcheon Suam Anryong Yesan Ugog Jigog Pungcheon Hwabong Samgag

0.13×10-5 0.14×10-5 0.10×10-5 0.10×10-5 0.10×10-5 0.12×10-5 0.12×10-5 0.12×10-5 0.35×10-5 0.10×10-5 0.10×10-5 0.14×10-5 0.21×10-5 0.10×10-5 0.19×10-5 0.13×10-5 0.10×10-5 0.86×10-5

0.89×10-5 1.93×10-5 0.66×10-5 0.66×10-5 0.58×10-5 1.03×10-5 0.37×10-5

- 1.41×10-5 1.55×10-5 0.23×10-5 1.31×10-5

- - 0.99×10-5

-

PTF VG

Table 4. Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity estimated with

10kPaby VG & PTF applied to VGM.

Soil Series

Gacheon Gocheon Namgye Chilgog Haggog Hoigog Baegsan Sangju Seogcheon Suam Anryong Yesan Ugog Jigog Pungcheon Hwabong Samgag

Paddy Land

Upland

Forest

0.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 3.9 6.4 5.0 0.7 22.5 8.2 7.5 0.7 0.7 22.5 22.8 11.4

0.7×10-5 2.0×10-5 4.7×10-5 1.8×10-5 13.9×10-5 6.8×10-5 11.9×10-5 10.7×10-5 1.0×10-5 1.1×10-5 3.9×10-5 15.7×10-5 0.8×10-5 1.3×10-5 5.8×10-5 14.5×10-5 40.8×10-5

2.7×10-5 2.5×10-5 4.3×10-5 2.9×10-5 5.0×10-5 1.6×10-5 2.5×10-5 6.4×10-5 1.4×10-5 6.8×10-5 5.1×10-5 2.3×10-5 1.9×10-5 2.2×10-5 2.3×10-5 2.1×10-5 4.0×10-5

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7 3.2×10-6 0.1×10-6 10.5×10-6 0.4×10-6 6.0×10-6 3.7×10-6 0.7×10-6

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7 2.0×10-6

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7 0.1×10-6 0.1×10-6 0.4×10-6

1.0×10-5 0.9×10-5 1.0×10-5 0.8×10-5 1.1×10-5 0.7×10-5 0.9×10-5 1.4×10-5 0.9×10-5 1.4×10-5 1.1×10-5 0.9×10-5 1.0×10-5 1.5×10-5 1.1×10-5 2.6×10-5 1.0×10-5

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7

<1.0×10-7

1.3×10-6 1.4×10-6 0.9×10-6 1.0×10-6 1.0×10-6 1.2×10-6 1.2×10-6 1.2×10-6 3.5×10-6 1.0×10-6 1.0×10-6 1.4×10-6 2.1×10-6 0.9×10-6 1.9×10-6 1.3×10-6 0.9×10-6 VGM Gardner

VGM Gardner

VGM Gardner

1 kPa (cm·sec-1)

3 kPa (cm·sec-1)

10 kPa (cm·sec-1) Gravel

Land Use (%)

Table 5. Comparison of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity by Gardner & VGM model.

(8)

VGM 10kPa

Gardner .

, ,

Fig. 4 .

Fig. 4 (a) Table 5

1k Pa Gardner VGM

, (b)

. (a) VGM

Gardner (exponential )

. VGM

, VGM

. ,

VGM .

, .

.

VGM(van Genuchten Mualem)

. VGM VGM

Rosetta . Rosetta

(neural network) , , 33 kPa, 1500 kPa

VGM Ko(effective saturated hydraulic conductivity), θr(residual soil water content), θs(saturated soil water content), L, n, m(=1-1/n)

(USDA-ARS) . Rosetta

10kPa

. Gardner Wooding

Gardner 1, 3, 5, 7 kPa

17 .

potential 3 kPa

,

, , , , 7

3 kPa . , 1 kPa

40.8×10-5 cm·sec-1

, ,

, .

1 kPa

. PTF VG 10 kPa

VGM ,

VG PTF

Fig. 4. Comparison of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity by Gardner & VGM at 1 kPa.

(9)

.

1 kPa VGM

Gardner

(exponential ) ,

. VGM

.

21 .

Ankeny, M.D., T.C. Kaspar, and R. Horton. 1988. Design for automated tension infiltrometer. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52:893-896.

Ankeny, M.D., T.C. Kaspar, and R. Horton. 1991. Simple method for determining unsaturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc.

Am. J. 55:467-470.

Cornelis, W.M., J. Ronsyn, M.V. Meirvenne, and R. Hartmann.

2001. Evaluation of pedotransfer functions for oredicting the soil moisture retention curve. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65:638-648.

Eom, K.C., G.C. Song, G.S. Ryu, Y.K. Sonn, and S.E. Lee. 1995.

Model equations to estimate the soil water characteristics curve using scaling factor. J. Korean Soc. Soil Sci. Fert. 28:227-232.

Gardner, W.R. 1958. Some steady-state solutions of the unsaturated moisture flow equation with application to evaporation from a water table. Soil Sci. 85:228-232.

Givi, J., S.O. Prasher, and R.M. Patel. 2004. Evaluation of pedotransfer functions in predicting the soil water contents at field capacity and wilting point. Agricultural Water Management.

70:83-96.

Hussen, A.A., and A.W. Warrick. 1991. Measurement of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity in the field. Ph.D. Dissertation, p.150, Univ. of Arizona., Tucson.

Hussen, A.A., and A.W. Warrick. 1993. Altenative analyses of hydraulic data from disc tension infiltrometer. Water Resources Research. 29:4103-4108.

Jung, Y.S., G.S. Ryu, and J.N. Im. 1980. Infiltration rate of some

upland soil in Korea. J. Korean Soc. Soil Sci. Fert. 13:1-6.

Jung, Y.S., L.Y. Kim, and J.N. Im. 1981. One dimensional heat flow equation incorporated with the vertical water flow on paddy soils -

Ⅰ. An analytical solution and it's application to tow different paddy soils with different percolation rates. J. Korean Soc. Soil Sci. Fert. 14:179-184.

Lien, B. 1989. Field measurement of soil soptivity and hydraulic conductivity, M.S. Thesis, p.93, Univ. of Arizona., Tucson.

Logsdon, S.D., and D.B. Jaynes. 1993. Methodology for determining hydraulic conductivity with tension infiltrometer. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57:1426-1431.

Mualem, Y. 1976. A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resources Research. 12:593-622.

Park, M.E., and S.H. Yoo. 1982. A comparison pf soil hydraulic conductivities determined by three different methods in a sandy loam soil. J. Korean Soc. Soil Sci. Fert. 16:14-19

Reynolds, W.D., and D.E. Elrick. 1991. Determination of hydraulic conductivity using a tension infiltrometer. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.

55:633-639.

Ro, H.M., and S.H. Yoo. 1984. Calculation of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity from soil moisture changes in Pressure-Plate extractor. J. Korean Soc. Soil Sci. Fert. 17:7-11.

Rumelhart, D.E., McClelland J.L., and the PDP Research Group.

1986. Parallel Distributed Processing: Exploration in the Microstructure of Cognition. Vol.1. MIT Press, Cambridge, USA Schaap, M.G., and W. Bouten. 1996. Modeling water retention

curves of sandy soils using neural networks. Water Resour. Res.

32:3033-3040.

Schaap, M.G., Leij F.J., and van Genuchten M.Th. 1998. Neural network analysis for hierarchical prediction of soil water retention and saturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62:847- 855.

Schwartz, R.C., and S.R. Evett. 2002. Estimating hydraulic properties of a fine-textured soil using a disc infiltrometer. Soil Sci.

Soc. Am. J. 66:409-1423.

van Genuchten, M. Th. 1980. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am.

J. 44:892-898.

Warick A.W. 2002. Soil physics companion. p.37, 75-76. CRC Press LLC. Boca Raton. USA

Wooding, R.A. 1968. Steady infiltration from shallow circular pond, Water Resources Research, 4:1259-1273.

Yoo, S.H. 2002. Soil encyclopedia. Seoul National University Press.

Seoul, Korea

참조

관련 문서

Torque &amp; power delivered by hydraulic motors Torque &amp; power delivered by hydraulic motors Performance of hydraulic motors.. Comparison of variable performance

4.14 Comparison of calculated hardness brinell by the model of Venugopalan et al.[8] and measured values from the present study and a literature[5].. 4.15 Comparison

가속도의 법칙: The acceleration of an object as produced by a net force is directly proportional to the magnitude of the net force in the same direction as the net force

Primary Functions of a Hydraulic Fluid Properties of Hydraulic Fluids p y..

Relaxation effects of active tension by propofol on spontaneous activity(S.A) and oxytocin(OT) induced contractions of rat uterine myometrium..

(Saturated zone is the zone in which the voids in the soil and rocks are filled with water at a pressure greater than atmospheric pressure).. (Unsaturated zone is the zone

addition of each monomer molecules to the chain end addition of each monomer molecules to the chain end involves an attack by the radical site on the unsaturated

To estimate the change of riverbed geography by the operation of movable weir, two-dimensional RMA-2 and SED-2D were used in this study. Hydraulic elements