• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Comparison of the Quality of Frozen Skipjack Tuna Katsuwonus pelamis Thawed by Vacuum and Water Immersion

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Comparison of the Quality of Frozen Skipjack Tuna Katsuwonus pelamis Thawed by Vacuum and Water Immersion"

Copied!
5
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

Original Article

635

Kor J Fish Aquat Sci 45(6),635-639,2012 한수지 45(6), 635-639, 2012

Thawing is very important in tuna canning because it affects the yield and quality of the canned tuna, and produc- tivity. The effects of vacuum thawing on the quality, yield, and thawing times of frozen skipjack were compared with conventional water immersion thawing. The time required to thaw frozen skipjack tuna (weight 2.5-3.0 kg) from -10℃ to -2℃ was 75, 60, and 37 min at a pressure of 17, 23, and 31 mmHg, respectively, corresponding to temperatures of 20, 25, and 30℃. The thawing time decreased with increasing pressure. Vacuum thawing shorten the thawing time by 58-80% compared with water immersion thawing at 20℃, and there was less difference be- tween the core and skin temperatures than with water immersion thawing. No significant change in pH or histamine was observed according to thawing method, while the volatile basic nitrogen (VBN), trimethylamine (TMA), and K value were lower with vacuum thawing than water immersion thawing. Based on these results, we believe that vacuum thawing minimizes the biochemical and microbial changes that occur while thawing frozen skipjack tuna.

Key words: Vacuum thawing, Water immersion thawing, Frozen skipjack tuna

Article history;

Received 20 November 2012; Revised 6 December 2012; Accepted 10 December 2012

*Corresponding author: Tel: +82. 63. 469. 1828 Fax: +82. 63. 469. 1828 E-mail address: [email protected]

Kor J Fish Aquat Sci 45(6) 635-639, December 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.5657/KFAS.2012.0635 pISSN:0374-8111, eISSN:2287-8815

The Korean Society of Fishereis and Aquatic Science. All rights reserved

Tae-Hun Lee and Jae-Geun Koo

1*

Comparison of the Quality of Frozen Skipjack Tuna Katsuwonus pelamis Thawed by Vacuum and Water Immersion

SEIN NW, Youngin 452-2, Korea

1Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kunsan National University, Kunsan 573-440, Korea

진공 해동과 침수 해동에 의한 냉동 가다랑어(Katsuwonus pelamis)의 품질 차이에 관한 연구

세인 NW, 1군산대학교 식품생명공학과

이태헌·구재근1*

서 론

참치통조림의원료인가다랑어는참치중에서가장작으 체온은상대적으로높아사후생화학적변화가매우활발하 일어난다. 따라서어획직후온도관리를소홀히하면자가 소화효소의작용에의하여육의분해가촉진되어심각한품질 문제가발생한다(Altringham and Block, 1997; Brown et al., 1967; Crawford et al., 1970). 참치통조림제조시주요온도관 공정은해동, 자숙냉각이다(Zhang et al., 2001). 일반적

으로사용하고있는해동방법은냉동참치를 15-20℃물속

침지시켜 3-8시간해동을실시하는데, 어체크기의불균일 인해과해동과미해동이자주발생된다. 과해동이되면 가소화효소의작용에의하여해동과정육단백질의분해가 일어나며, 미해동이되면자숙이불충분하여잔존효소의활성

의해자숙과냉각공정육단백질분해가일어난다. 따라

해동시냉동참치의중심품온을 -2-4℃까지가능한빠르게

해동하는것이매우중요하다.

진공해동은진공상태에서발생하는포화수증기의응축열을 이용하여해동하는기술이다. , 냉동원료를밀폐된탱크에 두고압력을낮추면포화수증기가발생하게되며, 수증기 냉동물의표피에응축이되면서내어놓는응축열에의하여 신속하게해동이이루어진다. 따라서진공해동은공기가없고 저온온도에서해동이진행되기때문에해동속도가빠르고 온이일정하며, 지방산화와세균발육등의변화가적게일어 난다.

연구에서는참치통조림제조의주요공정인해동공정에 있어서종래의침수해동이지니고있는공정시간과다소요, 균일한품온등의문제점을극복하기위하여진공해동방식의

(2)

이태헌·구재근 636

적용을검토하였다.

재료 및 방법

재료

중량 2.5-3.0 kg가다랑어(Katsuwonas pelamis)동원

F&B 창원공장에서구하여 -20℃냉동고에보관하여두고

원료로사용하였다.

진공해동, 스팀자숙 및 진공냉각 장치 제작

실험에사용한진공해동, 스팀자숙진공냉각장치는자체 제작하였고, 내부체적은 300 L이고, 탱크와진공펌프사이에 드라이아이스응축기를설치하였다. 탱크하부에는가열을 증기방출관을설치하였고, 상부에는분무를위한급수 라인을설치하였다(Fig. 1).

해동

진공해동은냉동가다랑어를선반위에놓고표피, 중심그리

표피와등뼈사이에온도센서를각각설치한 20℃ (17

mmHg), 25℃ (23 mmHg), 30℃ (31 mmHg) 조건으로압력 온도를유지하여중심품온이 -2℃도달하면해동을종료 하였다. 침수해동은어체중량의 5배의 20℃ 수조에침지하여

중심품온이 -2℃도달하면어체를수조에서들어냄으로서 해동을종료하였다.

성분 분석

일반성분은 AOAC 방법(1995)따라수분은상압가열

조법, 조단백질은 semi-micro Kjeldahl, 조회분은건식회화

, 조지방은 Soxhlet법으로측정하였다. 아미노태질소와

발성염기질소(VBN)각각 Formol법과 Conway unit 용한 미량확산법으로각각측정하였다(KFDA, 2012). 히스 타민 함량은 Kose and Hall (2000)방법, K 값은 Kim et al. (1998)방법, 트리메틸아민(TMA, trimethylamine) Hashimoto and Okaichi (1957)방법에따라분석하였다. 균수는 plate count agar (Difco Co., Detroit, MI, USA) 35

±0.5℃에서 48±2시간배양한 CFU시료 1 g 당으로 산하였다.

결과 및 고찰

가다랑어 육의 이화학적 성분

실험에사용한가다랑어의수분과조단백질은각각 71.0%,

25.1%일반어류에비해수분은낮고단백질은다소높은

향을나타내었고, 휘발성염기질소가 22.1 mg/100 g, 히스타민

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Temperature (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) Water 25

20 10 15

5 -20 -5 -10 -15

Sklm Core

20˚C25˚C 30˚C

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Temperature (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) -2.0

-4.0 -6.0 -8.0 -10.0 -12.0

Thawing time (m ln.)

Thawing temerature (˚C) 100

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10

0 20˚C (17mm Hg) 25˚C (23mm Hg)

y- -19x + 95.333 r2 - 0.9854

30˚C (21mm Hg)

Temperature difference (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) 100.0

10.0

1.00 20 40 60 80 100 120

y= -1.6397 X 10-3 x + 1.4646 R2 = 0.9863

30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0

5.0

0.00 5 10 15 20 0 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75

Temperature difference (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) 17 mmHg (20˚C) 25 mmHg (25˚C) 30 mmHg (30˚C)

Maximumtemperature difference (˚C)

Thawing temperatuer (˚C) 20˚C (30 mmHg)

35 30 25 20 15 10 5

0 25˚C (23 mmHg) 30˚C (31 mmHg)

y= 4.55x + 13.667 r2 = 0.9932

A B C

A B C

Temperature-monitor Dryice

Water Vacuum

pump

Water

Trap 610

1000 Steam valve

Steam Door

Water

Water sump Water

Pressure control valve Vacuum gauge Cold 1rap Air

Fig. 1. Lay-out of vacuum thawing, steaming cooking and vacuum cooling system.

(3)

진공 해동과 침수 해동에 의한 냉동 가다랑어의 품질 차이 637

함량이 0.81 mg/100 g, 일반세균이 2 .0×102 CFU/g신선도 양호하였다(Table 1).

해동 방법에 따른 해동 시간 변화

냉동가다랑어의중심품온이 -10℃에서 -2℃상승하는

걸리는시간은 20℃ 침수해동의경우는 180, 진공해동의

우는 20℃ (17 mmHg)에서 75, 25℃ (23 mmHg)에서 60 , 30℃ (31 mmHg)에서 37분이었다 (Fig. 2 and 3). , 진공 해동은침수해동에비하여해동시간이 58 ~ 80% 단축되었고 또한해동압력이높을수록해동시간은직선적으로단축되는 경향을나타내었다 (Fig. 4). 참치통조림제조에있어서해동

시작공정으로냉동된원료의품온을 -2-4℃까지가능한

르고균일하게해동하는것이매우중요하다. 최대빙결정생성

(-1--5℃)짧은시간에통과시키면육단백질의변성, 미생

증식, 효소활성화지방산화등의품질저하가적게일어 품질유지에많은도움이된다. 해동속도가너무빨라도 온도의급상승으로인해표피육의변질이촉진될있으

므로표피온도를과도하게상승시키지않으면서신속하게 동시키는것이바람직하다. Everington (1971)냉동쇠고기 진공해동을실시하였을해동시간은해동압력이높을수

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Temperature (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) Water 25

20

10 15

5 -20 -5 -10 -15

Sklm Core

20˚C25˚C 30˚C

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Temperature (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) -2.0

-4.0 -6.0 -8.0 -10.0 -12.0

Thawing time (m ln.)

Thawing temerature (˚C) 100

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10

0 20˚C (17mm Hg) 25˚C (23mm Hg)

y- -19x + 95.333 r2 - 0.9854

30˚C (21mm Hg)

Temperature difference (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) 100.0

10.0

1.00 20 40 60 80 100 120

y= -1.6397 X 10-3 x + 1.4646 R2 = 0.9863

30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0

5.0

0.00 5 10 15 20 0 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75

Temperature difference (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) 17 mmHg (20˚C) 25 mmHg (25˚C) 30 mmHg (30˚C)

Maximumtemperature difference (˚C)

Thawing temperatuer (˚C) 20˚C (30 mmHg)

35 30 25 20 15 10 5

0 25˚C (23 mmHg) 30˚C (31 mmHg)

y= 4.55x + 13.667 r2 = 0.9932

A B C

A B C

Temperature-monitor Dryice

Water Vacuum

pump

Water

Trap 610

1000 Steam valve

Steam Door

Water

Water sump Water

Pressure control valve Vacuum gauge Cold 1rap Air

Fig. 2. Changes in temperatures of frozen skipjack tuna Katsu- wonus pelamis during water immersion thawing at 20℃.

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Temperature (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) Water 25

20

10 15

5 -20 -5 -10 -15

Sklm Core

20˚C25˚C 30˚C

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Temperature (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) -2.0

-4.0 -6.0 -8.0 -10.0 -12.0

Thawing time (m ln.)

Thawing temerature (˚C) 100

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10

0 20˚C (17mm Hg) 25˚C (23mm Hg)

y- -19x + 95.333 r2 - 0.9854

30˚C (21mm Hg)

Temperature difference (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) 100.0

10.0

1.00 20 40 60 80 100 120

y= -1.6397 X 10-3 x + 1.4646 R2 = 0.9863

30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0

5.0

0.00 5 10 15 20 0 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75

Temperature difference (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) 17 mmHg (20˚C) 25 mmHg (25˚C) 30 mmHg (30˚C)

Maximumtemperature difference (˚C)

Thawing temperatuer (˚C) 20˚C (30 mmHg)

35 30 25 20 15 10 5

0 25˚C (23 mmHg) 30˚C (31 mmHg)

y= 4.55x + 13.667 r2 = 0.9932

A B C

A B C

Temperature-monitor Dryice

Water Vacuum

pump

Water

Trap 610

1000 Steam valve

Steam Door

Water

Water sump Water

Pressure control valve Vacuum gauge Cold 1rap Air

Fig. 3. Changes in core temperatures of frozen skipjack tuna Kat- suwonus pelamis during vacuum thawing at 20℃ (17 mmHg), 25℃ (23 mmHg), and 30℃ (31 mmHg).

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Temperature (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) Water 25

20 10 15

5 -20 -5 -10 -15

Sklm Core

20˚C25˚C 30˚C

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Temperature (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) -2.0

-4.0 -6.0 -8.0 -10.0 -12.0

Thawing time (m ln.)

Thawing temerature (˚C) 100

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10

0 20˚C (17mm Hg) 25˚C (23mm Hg)

y- -19x + 95.333 r2 - 0.9854

30˚C (21mm Hg)

Temperature difference (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) 100.0

10.0

1.00 20 40 60 80 100 120

y= -1.6397 X 10-3 x + 1.4646 R2 = 0.9863

30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0

5.0

0.00 5 10 15 20 0 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75

Temperature difference (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) 17 mmHg (20˚C) 25 mmHg (25˚C) 30 mmHg (30˚C)

Maximumtemperature difference (˚C)

Thawing temperatuer (˚C) 20˚C (30 mmHg)

35 30 25 20 15 10 5

0 25˚C (23 mmHg) 30˚C (31 mmHg)

y= 4.55x + 13.667 r2 = 0.9932

A B C

A B C

Temperature-monitor Dryice

Water Vacuum

pump

Water

Trap 610

1000 Steam valve

Steam Door

Water

Water sump Water

Pressure control valve Vacuum gauge Cold 1rap Air

Fig. 4. Thawing time against thawing temperature of frozen skip- jack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis .

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Temperature (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) Water 25

20

10 15

5 -20 -5 -10 -15

Sklm Core

20˚C25˚C 30˚C

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Temperature (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) -2.0

-4.0 -6.0 -8.0 -10.0 -12.0

Thawing time (m ln.)

Thawing temerature (˚C) 100

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10

0 20˚C (17mm Hg) 25˚C (23mm Hg)

y- -19x + 95.333 r2 - 0.9854

30˚C (21mm Hg)

Temperature difference (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) 100.0

10.0

1.00 20 40 60 80 100 120

y= -1.6397 X 10-3 x + 1.4646 R2 = 0.9863

30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0

5.0

0.00 5 10 15 20 0 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75

Temperature difference (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) 17 mmHg (20˚C) 25 mmHg (25˚C) 30 mmHg (30˚C)

Maximumtemperature difference (˚C)

Thawing temperatuer (˚C) 20˚C (30 mmHg)

35 30 25 20 15 10 5

0 25˚C (23 mmHg) 30˚C (31 mmHg)

y= 4.55x + 13.667 r2 = 0.9932

A B C

A B C

Temperature-monitor Dryice

Water Vacuum

pump

Water

Trap 610

1000 Steam valve

Steam Door

Water

Water sump Water

Pressure control valve Vacuum gauge Cold 1rap Air

Fig. 5. Change in temperature difference between core and sur- face of frozen skipjack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis during water immersion thawing at 20.

Table 1. Chemical composition and viable cell counts of frozen skipjack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis

Components Results1

Moisture (%) 71.0 ± 0.2 Crude protein (%) 25.1 ± 0.3 Crude lipid (%) 1.7 ± 0.2 Crude ash (%) 1.6 ± 0.1 pH 5.6 ± 0.0 VBN (mg/100 g) 22.1 ± 0.5 Histamine (mg/100 g) 0.8 ± 0.0 Viable cell (CFU/g) 2.0 x 102

1 Mean ± standard deviation (n=5).

(4)

이태헌·구재근 638

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Temperature (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) Water 25

20

10 15

5 -20 -5 -10 -15

Sklm Core

20˚C25˚C 30˚C

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Temperature (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) -2.0

-4.0 -6.0 -8.0 -10.0 -12.0

Thawing time (m ln.)

Thawing temerature (˚C) 100

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10

0 20˚C (17mm Hg) 25˚C (23mm Hg)

y- -19x + 95.333 r2 - 0.9854

30˚C (21mm Hg)

Temperature difference (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) 100.0

10.0

1.00 20 40 60 80 100 120

y= -1.6397 X 10-3 x + 1.4646 R2 = 0.9863

30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0

5.0

0.00 5 10 15 20 0 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75

Temperature difference (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) 17 mmHg (20˚C) 25 mmHg (25˚C) 30 mmHg (30˚C)

Maximumtemperature difference (˚C)

Thawing temperatuer (˚C) 20˚C (30 mmHg)

35 30 25 20 15 10 5

0 25˚C (23 mmHg) 30˚C (31 mmHg)

y= 4.55x + 13.667 r2 = 0.9932

A B C

A B C

Temperature-monitor Dryice

Water Vacuum

pump

Water

Trap 610

1000 Steam valve

Steam Door

Water

Water sump Water

Pressure control valve Vacuum gauge Cold 1rap Air

Fig. 6. Changes in temperature difference between core and skin of frozen skipjack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis during vacuum thawing at 17 mmHg, 23 mmHg and 31 mmHg.

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Temperature (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) Water 25

20 10 15

5 -20 -5 -10 -15

Sklm Core

20˚C25˚C 30˚C

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Temperature (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) -2.0

-4.0 -6.0 -8.0 -10.0 -12.0

Thawing time (m ln.)

Thawing temerature (˚C) 100

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10

0 20˚C (17mm Hg) 25˚C (23mm Hg)

y- -19x + 95.333 r2 - 0.9854

30˚C (21mm Hg)

Temperature difference (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) 100.0

10.0

1.00 20 40 60 80 100 120

y= -1.6397 X 10-3 x + 1.4646 R2 = 0.9863

30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0

5.0

0.00 5 10 15 20 0 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75

Temperature difference (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) 17 mmHg (20˚C) 25 mmHg (25˚C) 30 mmHg (30˚C)

Maximumtemperature difference (˚C)

Thawing temperatuer (˚C) 20˚C (30 mmHg)

35 30 25 20 15 10 5

0 25˚C (23 mmHg) 30˚C (31 mmHg)

y= 4.55x + 13.667 r2 = 0.9932

A B C

A B C

Temperature-monitor Dryice

Water Vacuum

pump

Water

Trap 610

1000 Steam valve

Steam Door

Water

Water sump Water

Pressure control valve Vacuum gauge Cold 1rap Air

Fig. 7. Plot of maximum temperature difference between core and skin of frozen skipjack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis during vacuum thawing.

직선적으로감소하였다고보고하였다. 냉동새우블록과 자미블록, 냉동조기갈치블록도진공해동을하면유수해 , 송풍해동, 자연해동보다해동시간이현격히줄어들었다 (Jason, 2001; Kim et al., 2003).

해동 중 품온 변화

해동과정에서일어나는부위별온도편차는해동육의 질에나쁜영향을미치므로가능한온도편차가적게발생하도 관리를하여야한다. 특히과해동이발생하면해동중에 피가다른부위에비하여이화학적변화미생물증식이 르게진행되어수율감소와품질저하를초래한다.

해동중심과표피의온도차이는침수해동의경우해동

기에 29℃이었으나지속적으로감소하여 80경과시 18℃도달한일정하게유지하였다(Fig. 5). 침수해동의 초기에온도차이가크게나는것은해동과동시에표피의 도가해동수온도까지급상승하기때문이다. 반면에진공해동 온도차이는초기의경우 5℃ 정도로작았으나시간이경과 함에따라점차적으로커져최대온도차이는 17 mmHg에서 17℃, 23 mmHg에서 23℃, 31 mmHg에서 27℃해동압력 높을수록비례적으로커졌다 (Fig. 6, 7). 특히 31 mmHg

리구의경우해동시작 25분에표피온도가 20℃, 최대온도

이가 25℃표피가부분적으로과해동되어육질이다소물러 졌다. 반면에 17 mmHg 23 mmHg에서는연화현상이나타 나지않았고균일하게해동이이루어졌다. , 침수해동에서

표피온도는해동초기부터온도부근까지상승하나, 20℃

25℃ 진공해동의경우에는해동종료시점에서의온도가

내부온도보다 2 - 3℃ 정도낮게관리되어, 25℃ 이하에서

진공해동을실시하면해동과정을거쳐부분적인과열에 품질저하는일어나지않는것으로판단되었다.

해동 중 생화학적 변화

가다랑어의해동전후이화학적, 미생물학적변화는 Table 2 같다. pH히스타민값은해동전후와해동방법에따라

차이가없었다. 반면에 VBN, TMA, K값은해동각각

22.1 mg/100 g, 1.0 mg/100 g, 20.4%에서진공해동 23.6 mg/100 g, 1.1 mg/100 g, 22.5%변화가없었으나, 침수 해동후에는 26.3 mg/100 g, 1.5 mg/100 g, 32.9%상승하였 . 따라서진공해동이침수해동에비하여품질저하가적음 있다. 또한해동방법차이에따른가다랑어세포 직의구조적인변화를파악하기위하여자연해동, 침수해동

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Temperature (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) Water 25

20 10 15

5 -20 -5 -10 -15

Sklm Core

20˚C25˚C 30˚C

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Temperature (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) -2.0

-4.0 -6.0 -8.0 -10.0 -12.0

Thawing time (m ln.)

Thawing temerature (˚C) 100

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10

0 20˚C (17mm Hg) 25˚C (23mm Hg)

y- -19x + 95.333 r2 - 0.9854

30˚C (21mm Hg)

Temperature difference (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) 100.0

10.0

1.00 20 40 60 80 100 120

y= -1.6397 X 10-3 x + 1.4646 R2 = 0.9863

30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0

5.0

0.00 5 10 15 20 0 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75

Temperature difference (˚C)

Thawing time (min.) 17 mmHg (20˚C) 25 mmHg (25˚C) 30 mmHg (30˚C)

Maximumtemperature difference (˚C)

Thawing temperatuer (˚C) 20˚C (30 mmHg)

35 30 25 20 15 10 5

0 25˚C (23 mmHg) 30˚C (31 mmHg)

y= 4.55x + 13.667 r2 = 0.9932

A B C

A B C

Temperature-monitor Dryice

Water Vacuum

pump

Water

Trap 610

1000 Steam valve

Steam Door

Water

Water sump Water

Pressure control valve Vacuum gauge Cold 1rap Air

Fig. 8. Corss and longitudinal sections in dorsal muscle of skip- jack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis after thawing.

A: air thawing at room temperature B: water immersion thawing at 20℃

C: vacuum thawing at 23 mmHg (25℃) Bars indicate 50 ㎛.

(5)

진공 해동과 침수 해동에 의한 냉동 가다랑어의 품질 차이 639

진공해동( 23 mmHg/25℃)근육조직을현미경으로촬영

하여비교하였다(Fig. 8). 머리에서꼬리방향의종축절단면과 횡축절단면모두실온자연해동에서근육세포의파괴가가장 많이일어났으며, 다음으로침수해동, 진공해동의순이었다.

Crepey and Han-Ching (1979)해동중에도미생물의증식 일어나므로해동은가능한단시간에실시하는것이바람직 하고, 이러한목적에가장적합한방법은진공해동이라고하였 . 실험에서도진공해동이침수해동에비하여해동시간이 단축되고, 중심온도와표피온도간에차이가적으며해동공 정에서발생하는생화학적, 미생물적인변화가적은것으로 루어참치통조림제조를위한냉동가다랑어의해동공 정으로진공해동이침수해동보다적절함을있었다.

사 사

논문은 2012군산대학교수산과학연구소학술연구비

지원에의하여연구되었음

참고문헌

Altringham T and Block B. 1997. Why do tuna maintain el- evated slow muscle temperature? Power output of muscle temperature? Power output of muscle temperature isolated from endothermic and ectothermic fish. J Exp Bio 200, 2617-2627.

AOAC. 1995. Offi cial Methods of Analysis. 16th ed. Associa- tion of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC., USA, 69-74.

Brown WD, Finch R, Kwon TW, Olcott HS and Schaefer MB.

1967. Relation of quality of canned yellowfi n tuna to length of fi sh, time of holding on deck, frozen storage aboard ves- sel, and biochemical variables. Fishery Ind Res 4, 1-21.

Crawford L, Irwin EJ, Spinelli J and Brown WD. 1970. Pre- mortem stress and postmortem biochemical changes in

skipjack tuna and their relation to quality of the canned product. J Food Sci 35, 849-851.

Crepey JR and Han-Ching L. 1979. Progress in thawing of seafoods. Quality of thawed products. Peche Maritime 58, 747-751.

Everington DW. 1971. Thawing of frozen foodstuffs. Chemis- try and Industry, 973-978.

Hashimoto Y and Okaichi T. 1957. On the determination of TMA and TMAO. A modifi cation of dyer method. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 23, 269-272.

Jason AC. 2001. Thawing frozen fi sh. Torry advisory note No.

25, Torry Research Station, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisher- ies and Food.

KFDA (Korea Food and Drug Administration). 2012. In: Food code. KFDA, Seoul, Korea. 10-1-13 and 5-11-1.

Kim DK, Park IS and Im NS. 1998. Determination of chemical freshness indices for chilled and frozen fi sh. Korean J Food Sci Technol 30, 993-999.

Kim SG, Park YS, Choi HG, Lee JH and Kim KK. 2003. A study on the combined equipment for the pre-cooling and the thawing using the low temperature vacuum system. J Kor Soc Mar Eng 27, 280-288.

Kose S and Hall G. 2000. Modifi cation of a colorimetric meth- od for histamine analysis in fish meal. Food Res Int 33, 839-845.

Zhang J, Farkas BE and Hale SA. 2001. Thermal properties of skipjack tuna. Int J Food Prop 41, 81-90.

Table 2. Changes in biochemical chracterization and viable cell counts of skipjack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis before and after thawing

Components Before thawing

After thawing Vacuum1 Water

immersion pH 5.6 ± 0.02 5.6 ± 0.0 5.7 ± 0.0 VBN (mg/100 g) 22.1 ± 0.5 23.6 ± 0.4 26.3 ± 0.6 Histamine (mg/100 g) 0.8 ± 0.0 0.8 ± 0.0 0.9 ± 0.0 TMA (mg%) 1.0 ± 0.1 1.1 ± 0.0 1.5 ± 0.1 K value (%) 20.4 ± 0.2 22.5 ± 0.3 32.9 ± 0.5 Viable cell (CFU/g) 2.0 x 102 3.2 x 102 2.5 x 103

1Vacuum thawing condition: 23 ㎜Hg/25℃.

2Mean±standard deviation (n=5)

수치

Fig. 1. Lay-out of vacuum thawing, steaming cooking and vacuum cooling system.
Table 1. Chemical composition and viable cell counts of frozen  skipjack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis
Fig. 7. Plot of maximum temperature difference between core and  skin of frozen skipjack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis  during vacuum  thawing.
Table 2. Changes in biochemical chracterization and viable cell  counts of skipjack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis  before and after  thawing Components    Before     thawing After thawing Vacuum 1 Water  immersion pH    5.6 ± 0.0 2   5.6 ± 0.0     5.7 ± 0.0 VBN

참조

관련 문서

The purpose of this research was to suggest the water quality improvement in streams by evaluating the distribution characteristics of organics and ammonia nitrogen

2001.. to determine influence of planting space and the number of plants per hill on agronomic characters, forage yield and quality of Jeju Italian millet..

36 SEM Microphotographs of the Electrical Electrodes of the Burn Resistor PCB ((a): Before Vibration and Thermal Vacuum Test, (b): After Vibration and Thermal

Second, the perception of exercise immersion based on the general characteristics of the study subjects (gender, grade, guidance period, participation time,

Summary of ANOVA on water quality and clearance rates (CR) and pseudo-feces and feces production of mussels (PFP) during the operation Continuous removal

(a) The initial slopes of the water-uptake curve of PSMA ion- omers neutralized with various cations and (b) ratios of the weight of the ionomer with maximum absorption of water

The inlet temperatures of each stages and return water, evaporation rates of each stages and total fresh water generating rates were predicted. By varying

Vacuum pre-cooling system's principle is that water saturated temperature is lowered according to the vacuum pressure established in the storage chamber,