A Study of Oral Health Status in Handicapped Students Comparing with Normal Students

전체 글

(1)Journal of Dental Hygiene Science Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 115~ 119 (2002). .

(2) †. . .

(3) . 1. A Study of Oral Health Status in Handicapped Students Comparing with Normal Students †. Ji-Youn Lee and Chang-Hee Kim1 Department of Dental Hygiene, Wonkwang Health Science College, 1 Department of Dental Hygiene, Shin-sung College. This study was carried out to evaluate the status of oral health in physically or mentally handicapped students. The status of oral health in 597 handicapped students of six special education institutes and 731 normal students in Chonbuk province were inspected by a dental hygienist from August to November of 1999. 1) The DT index(Decayed Teeth index) was significantly higher in handicapped students comparing with those of normal students. The proportions of children having gingivitis and malocclusion were also significantly higher in handicapped group (p<0.01). 2) The incidences of dental caries, gingivitis and malocclusion were significantly higher in mentally retarded students comparing with those of physical or sensory impairment groups(p<0.01). 3) Handicapped students participating in the regular school teeth-control program showed significantly low incidences of gingivitis and malocclusion comparing with nonparticipants. However, dental caries had no relationships with teeth control program. There were no differences between commuting and domitory-resident students in the incidences of dental caries, gingivitis and malocclusion.

(4) . . m K7 sCÎ e; 8( / { a + ' , Yd. KL 7 = > z8; ! ~K < [ z{ 6 #/ 2 S F # . VNP 7 i VN[Q vw 7 [ VNQvw. 7 [ 6 ' / VN [ Q vw 6 2 q. ; M Ds/ v w a VN^:, VN^: Ds) ¡ ¢/ y£¤L¡ ¥ ¡ ' /¦ ,

(5) > s?; ; § ¨¤a, )} Vvw [R V© ª^« ¬O ®7 8; #/ 2 ^# . VIVW ¯~m @

(6) °;7 §I Y dI K±. ! VN^: w| zO7 § I( "², V°;.r/ [ Vvw # O³# . Cotti ¥ VN V?( ~m 6 ´ O( a²/¦ ; :;µ. ¶ Vv wI ·Vc w¸; :;¹m "² 3º ¯~m a ²#. ¢7 »j.rR _¸z N¼

(7) >?. 87 @

(8) , ~K N¼ VN^:. 87 @

(9) , NK w¸ VN^. 87 @

(10) , ½0N

(11) >s?. 87 @

(12) , 9 N¼

(13) >?. 67 @

(14) , 9¸.

(15) 1000 3.09 145 , 1.35 , 0.31 , 0.47 , 0.42 , ! 0.44 " # . $%& ' ( )* + , 2020-./ 0 200 1 2 3 , 45./ . 67 6 89 :; ! < => ?. 67 @

(16) ; AB C DE FG #. . 67 H; IJ. KL M NF 2 OP NQR ST7 P U). VI FWR 3XY '/ Z#. [

(17) >=>. 8\] ^ _àU

(18) >8 ?; bca Yd"#

(19) >F W. 67 ef gh; 9aU i. ji a).R e k7 l MN

(20) >=>m :Fn) !o#. VN^: S pO6 q.rR Dstu vwx yY i r/ 46 z{|m }j/ ~vw#. / ^sC. 2). 1). 3). 4). 5). †. Corresponding author Tel: 063-840-1260 Fax: 063-840-1269 E-mail: [email protected]. . 6).

(21) . A Study of Oral Health Status in Handicapped Students Comparing with Normal Students.

(22) >?. 87 Ó ¥ D³# . < < zV ¾

(23) V VN^: K± Vvw, ±¿ ?, VN )À ¥m Ydm 6Á @

(24) a² ¢7

(25) >=>? 8( UÂ <I @8Ã/¦ Â7 </ ÄÅv ;ÆU_, ÄÅv , ÄÅv Ç', ^Ç', ^ Èq, ÉÊ ±Ë'*, QÌz· [Í ? ¥. 67 @

(26) < Î!Ï#.

(27) >=>? VN^: Vvw. 67 Ð @8~. 87 ´ @

(28) / UÂ ¸<. L "] NQR Ñ Y] @8~m Ò Óa/ P#. 2 Í7 ] ' ÔO ÕÖ vw *] )* _¸z 7 M O Í , 2 " #. . × @

(29) /

(30) >=>?. 67 ØÙa * ] ´ O. L

(31) >=>?( ÚE Fy °;aU

(32) >"=Ûm 7 )Ü¸W( Íga¸ 7#. 2,7-13). . O) 1999- 8Ý_Þ 11Ý& 0 4Ý ¼f ßR % 6 ± s 597 m 6 a², s 347 , s 24 , s 25 , s 134 , ! s 67 ³, @à 6-20 &#. 6Á ßRj 4 Üáá±s 731 m 6 a²#. 2.

(33) >ÔO/ Q®

(34) >ÔO( a²#. "=)

(35) (WHO); âa/ . L v{ 9ãÂä ,/ Z/ 2 a², ¸@Øp. 7 Nå

(36) >ÔO¤ V[, æç, èé,

(37) ) ¥m O¤aU Ëf ^¾

(38) V, P¾

(39) V, Vvw, ±¿?( 8êa²#. 3.

(40) sI Yds

(41) >=>? ~I @à. ¶ë h/ ìR £| ía², sI Yds zÀ. ¶ë

(42) >s? K± x -Ô, t- Ô, ANOVA ©m Pa²#. 1.. 2.

(43). s 597 I Yds 731 m O7 §I #ªI î O~m ï³#( 1). 1. sI Yds

(44) >=>? ^¾

(45) V/ s 2.05ð2.24 Yds 2.00 ð2.39 Kñ7 '*³, P¾

(46) V/ s 0.41 ð1.16 Yds 0.11ð0.54 $ò7 Ö; ³ #(p<0.01). Vvw / s 29.1%, Yds 10.9% ´ $ò7 Ö; ³#(p<0.01). ±¿?.r/ _±¿ / s 25.6% Yds 7.4% $ò7 Ö( "²#(p<0.01)( 2)..

(47) .

(48) . . - 10 11 - 13 14 - 16 17 -. . . : (%)). . 373(62.5) 224(37.5). 420(57.5) 311(42.5). 92(15.4) 132(22.1) 148(24.8) 225(37.7). 100(13.7) 151(20.7) 189(25.9) 291(39.8). 597(100). 731(100). (. . ** ** !** "# #. 0.411.16. 2.05 2.24. : (%)). p 2.002.39 0.739 0.110.54 <0.000. ((Mean SD). 174(29.1). 80(10.9). 423(70.9). 651(89.1). 153(25.6). 54( 7.4). 444(74.4). 677(92.6). <0.000. <0.000. ** : p < 0.01. 2. sI Yds ~I @à

(49) >=>?( Oa², s.r ) VN8z· óyô^z · zÀ s, s, õ)Æ s(áá ! s)

(50) >=>? (1) ^¾

(51) V ~.r/ Ö; Z³ @à.r/ s 10 a; 2.30ð2.14, 11-13; 1.95ð1.92, 14-16; 1.84 ð2.05, 17 2.13ð2.55 Yds 10 a; 1.85ð2.51, 11-13/ 1.26ð1.60, 14-16/ 2.68 ð2.80, 17 2.00ð2.30 Ö; ³#(p<0.05). s .r/ ) VN8( a / ± ö ÷ ± s ^¾

(52) V.r Ö; Z³, óy ôÛ_.rR î §I( "²#. Â zÀ/ s 2.24ð2.14, s 2.80ð4.01 , õ)Æs 1.75ð2.10 Ö; ³#(p<0.05) ( 3). (2) P¾

(53) V s ~.r/ Ö; Z³ @à.r/ s 10 a; 0.34ð1.02, 11-13; 0.33ð0.93, 1416; 0.24ð1.01, 17 0.60ð1.39 Ö; ³#(p<0.05). Â ) VN8( a / U _ óyôÛ_ zÀ/ Ö; Z³#( 4). (3) Vvw sI Yds ~.r/ Ö; Z³, .

(54) . Journal of Dental Hygiene Science Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 115~119 (2002). .

(55) *. . . . 2.28 2.48 1.63 2.22. 2.14 1.92 2.05 2.55. 1.85 1.26 2.68 2.00. a). 1.98 2.05 2.15 2.53. b). - 10 11 - 13 14 - 16 17 -. #$%&!' () * * #+,,./$0. 2.30 1.95 1.84 2.13. c). 2.51 1.60 2.80 2.30. p 0.062. 0.004. 2.02 2.23 2.08 2.25. . -. 0.751. 2.09 2.27 2.03 2.23. . -. 0.967. . -. 0.037. d). e). . . (Mean SD). 2.24 2.14 2.08 4.01 1.75 2.10. , b) .

(56) !

(57) " #$%& '()* +, -./ 01 d)

(58) 2!

(59) 34 '5 $6 37 +, -8 9:;

(60) * <=, -./ 01 e) 9>?@>?AB

(61) 3 * : p < 0.05 a) c). . .

(62) ** a). . . . 0.13 0.56 0.09 0.51. . 1.02 0.93 1.01 1.39. 0.12 0.12 0.08 0.13. 0.37 1.08 0.49 1.28. b). - 10 11 - 13 14 - 16 17 -. #$%&!' () * #+,,./$0. c). d). e). 0.34 0.33 0.24 0.60. . 0.47 1.32 0.36 0.99. 0.48 0.50 0.35 0.67 -. . (Mean SD) p 0.395. 0.008. 12 32.

(63) **. : (%)). (. 12 32. p. 115(66.1) 258(61.0) 49(61.3) 371(57.0) 0.242a) 59(33.9) 165(39.0) 31(38.7) 280(43.0) 0.467b). - 10. 5( 2.9) 87(20.6). 0. 100(15.4) <0.000. 11 - 13. 15( 8.6) 117(27.7). 0. 151(23.2). 14 - 16. 41(23.6) 107(25.3) 12(15.0) 177(27.2). 17 -. 113(64.9) 112(26.4) 68(85.0) 223(34.2). #$%&!' ** 57(32.8) 235(55.6) 117(67.2) 188(44.4) () 56(32.2) 108(25.5) 118(67.8) 315(74.5) * ** #+,- 111(63.8) 236(55.8) ,21(12.1) 3( 0.7) ./$0 42(24.1) 184(43.5) d). 0.269. . -. 0.694. . -. 0.465. , b) .

(64) !

(65) " #$%& '()* +, -./ 01 d)

(66) 2!

(67) 34 '5 $6 37 +, -8 9:;

(68) * <=, -./ 01 e) 9>?@>?AB

(69) 3 ** : p < 0.01 a) c). . c). 0.39 1.17 0.42 1.16 0.46 1.15 0.29 1.04 0.35 1.19. s @à.r/ 10 a; 2.9%, 11-13/ 8.6%, 14-16 .r/ 23.6%, 17 64.9% Ö; ³#(p<0.01). Â Yds 10 a 11-13 s O./ Vvw ø Z³, ) VN8( a / ± s 32.8% ³, ö ÷ ± s V vw 67.2% w|. !r $ò7 Ö; ³# (p<0.01). zÀ.r/ s 63.8% ; ù, õ)Æs 24.1%, s 12.1% ; ú }û(p<0.01), óyôÛ_. ¶ë Vvw Ö; Z³#( 5). (4) ±¿? ~.r Ö/ Z³, @à.r/ s 10 a/ 7.8%, 11-13/ 9.8%, 14-16.r/ 30.7%, 17 51.7% Ö; ³(p<0.01), Yds.r/ Ö ; Z³#. Â ) VN8( a / ± s _±¿ 32.7%, ö ÷ ± s 67.3% Ö; ³, zÀ/ s 59.5% ; ù õ)Æs 31.3%, s 9.2% Ö; ³(p<0.01), óyôÛ_.r/ Ö ; Z³#( 6).. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. <0.000. e). f). 0.061. <0.000.

(70) 3 C

(71) 3 .

(72) 3 .

(73) !

(74) " #$%& '()* +, -./ 01 e)

(75) 2!

(76) 34 '5 $6 37 +, -8 9:;

(77) * <=, -./ 01 f) 9>?@>?AB

(78) 3 ** : p < 0.01 a) b) c) d).

(79) . A Study of Oral Health Status in Handicapped Students Comparing with Normal Students. . : (%)). (. "# # "# #

(80) 92(60.1) 281(63.3) 34(63.0) 386(57.0) 61(39.9) 163(36.7) 20(37.0) 291(43.0) ** - 9. 12( 7.8). 80(18.0). 7(13.0). p. 0.274a) 0.241b). 93(13.7) <0.000c). 10 - 13. 15( 9.8) 117(26.4). 9(16.7) 142(21.0). 14 - 16. 47(30.7) 101(22.7) 13(24.1) 176(26.0) 0.763d). 17 -. 79(51.7) 146(32.9) 25(46.2) 266(39.3). #$%&!' ** 50(32.7) 242(54.5) 103(67.3) 202(45.5) () 50(32.7) 114(25.7) 103(67.3) 330(74.3) * ** #+,- 91(59.5) 256(57.7) ,14( 9.2) 10( 2.3) ./$0 48(31.3) 178(40.0) e). -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. <0.000. f). g). 0.059. <0.000.

(81) 3 C

(82) 3 .

(83) 3 C

(84) 3 .

(85) !

(86) " #$%& '()* +, -./ 01 f)

(87) 2!

(88) 34 '5 $6 37 +, -8 9:;

(89) * <=, -./ 01 g) 9>?@>?AB

(90) 3 ** : p < 0.01 a) b) c) d) e). . 7» .r Yd VN^:. 67 ´ @

(91) / K± #a @

(92) ] üóy(Oý_Þ þ '¤! / <)

(93) >=>?. 67 @

(94) / ÿ k <

(95) >"=8( Lr

(96) >?( O7#/ 2 S( /# ' #. 7»

(97) >vw " . } ^|I K±Á.r } §I/ J zOµm " /¦ / × @

(98) ¸ O YV7 §I( } j #. ¢7 . 67 @

(99) ". ! ^'/ YdI Ö; Z# "a/ d E VN^: Vvw|m "a² ±¿?/ # ÷# a² i bc7

(100) >=>?( " a²/¦ / _É I"Ð 7 ¸ ;\ _` , a # . '¤ ÷ ~K N¼ '¤! / ["# ^|m }. ªm "aU ^?( >t, Curtress / _¸z N¼.r @à:;. ¶ë

(101) >=>?; A bca# t / × O¸ @

(102) §I YVa #. ~.r/ ^VN;

(103) Kñ7 §I; }û × O¸/ 14). 2,7-13). 15). / YdN¼I _¸z N¼

(104)

(105) >=>' . !r U¸. KL ¸; 2 "a #. VIvw. 87 IJ UÂ ¸< M @

(106) "; ³, §I.r M Ölm " #. 6 < H¿( Yd

(107) >= >?; bcaU VN^| Vvw ìR; # "7 d IJ UÂ ¸ @

(108) "( Ð K±, © aU #ë < VN^| YdI # ÷ # R; 9a

(109) >=>?; E !F# . s. 67 Ú7 @

(110) . !r "a²# ;.r ] N¼"# ÷ %;'Ì X] N¼. 67 ÔF 7; ) s<R 1-. 2 Pa/ À^

(111) >ÔF Ú7 'V( ' Z #-. Ê ] ¸W; _PaU s

(112) >=> ?( yk . O ' Z/ 7. a² @

(113) ; ! N¼ 7 . 67 #-

(114) >=> ? ¸W; ! 2 OW]#. § s Yds"#

(115) >=>?; bca, s #ë ( ;F s"# VN^:, Vvw _ ±¿ ìR; 2 "N . AB A 89m ;

(116) >=>8( L 2, ) VN8( Ga/ ±R :;!

(117) >=>8( "òE aU 3º Ü)V W 8 G VIvw VW#V"# 3º#V ¯~ >! 2 OW]#. @

(118) / ßR . / s Yds( 6 a²). . sI Yds. Ú6 ¤n)./ 7; ! _m "$7 @

(119) ; ! 2#. 8). 2,8,9,12,14,16). . × @

(120) / , ; / s

(121) > =>?( Oa² 6Á/ Yd±. #/ Yd sm 6 a²#. 6 ± s<I 4 Yd ± s<m Oa²#. O) 1999- 8Ý_Þ 1999 - 11Ý&, s 597 I Yds 731

(122) >= >?( O °;L "ù#. 1. sI Yds

(123) >=>?/ ^¾

(124) V/ Kñ 7 '*³, P¾

(125) V/ Yds(0.11ð0.54)"# s(0.41ð1.16).r }û(p<0.01), V vwR Yds(10.9%)"# s(29.1%), _ ±¿.rR Yds(7.4%)"# s(25.6%).r A }û#(p<0.01). 2. zÀ. ¶ë

(126) >=>?/ ^¾

(127) V.r 2.24ð 2.14 s ; }û, õ )Æ s 1.75ð2.10 ; ú }û# (p<0.05). P¾

(128) V/ zÀ. ¶ë Ö/ Z³, Vvw.r/ s 63.8% ; }û#. ¢7 _±¿.rR s 59.5% s(9.2%) õ)Æs(31.3%)"# }û#(p<0.01). 3. ) VN8( a / ± s. KL ö Ó7 ± s VvwI _±¿ Mù.

(129) Journal of Dental Hygiene Science Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 115~119 (2002). , ^¾

(130) V P¾

(131) V/ Kñ7 '*³#. óy ô^m a/ ± sI ö ÷ ± s. 6 7 ^¾

(132) V, P¾

(133) V, Vvw, _±¿.r/ É % Kñ7 '*³#.. . 1. 2.. DEF;: GD HI J KLM,. 2000. INO, 4PQ: RS ' 'TUV ( WX

(134) % F. Y'

(135) E/, 4(1): 45-52, 1977.. 3. Miller WD: New Theories concerning Decay of Teeth. D Cosmos, 47: 1293, 1905. 4. : . , 6(1): 109-111, 1982. 5. Costello PJ: Dental health status of mentally and physically handicapped children and adults in the Galway Community Care Area of the Western Health Board. J Ir Dent Assoc, 36(3): 99101, 1990. 6. Cotti S, Rizzo A, Cotti M: Handicapped and oral pathology. Clinico-statistical survey Dent Cadmos, 58(20): 58-66, 1990.. Z[\ /]1J^J F_`L ( ,a GbY

(136) c de. . Z`f: /]1J^ ' F_`L ( ,a. Y'

(137) E/, 2(1), 1975. 8. ghi: /]1J^ ' F_j3`L ( WX

(138) % F: Y'

(139) E/, 5(1): 47-63, 1978. 9. 4PQ: 'S \J 'TU ( k

(140) % F. Y'

(141) E/, 5(1): 39-43, 1978. 10. ZPl, Z\: #ImnJ F_j3`L M,. Y oE/, 8: 477-480, 1970. 11. /& , p: #Imn' F_ `L ( ,a. Y'

(142) E/, 8(1): 77-88, 1981. 12. q#r: HI ' F_`L ( WX

(143) % F. F_3s

(144) F, 5: 139-149, 1982. 13. Ztu, vwx: HI J F_`L ( k

(145) M. Y '

(146) E/, 25(2): 441-449, 1998. 14. D& F_y\,: DF_oE, 1976. 7.. 15. Cutress T: Dental caries in Trisomy 21. Arch Oral Biol, 16: 1329-1344, 1971. 16. : . , 10(1): 13-23, 1983. (Received November 14, 2002; Accepted December 16, 2002). 4zx HI J y\ KL, Y'

(147) E/.

(148)