A study on the Change of Hand of Chitosan Crosslinked Cotton Fabrics - Effect of Concentration of Epichlorohydrin and Chitosan -
전체 글
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15) !
(16)
(17) " #$ %
(18)
(19)
(20) " #&$ %
(21) '
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30) '
(31)
(32) "
(33) "
(34)
(35)
(36) ()
(37) "
(38) *
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47) +
(48) ,+,!
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)
(53)
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)
(59) "
(60)
(61)
(62) "
(63)
(64)
(65)
(66) "
(67)
(68) "
(69) "
(70) "
(71)
(72)
(73)
(74) "
(75) "
(76)
(77)
(78) "
(79) "
(80)
(81)
(82)
(83)
(84)
(85) ) "
(86)
(87)
(88)
(89) "
(90)
(91) "
(92)
(93)
(94)
(95) "
(96) "
(97)
(98)
(99) "
(100)
(101)
(102)
(103)
(104)
(105)
(106)
(107)
(108) ! .H\ ZRUGV
(109) "
(110)
(111) "
(112)
(113) " "
(114)
(115) . 1.. * V. Þ, &¦ª~ çbf çb~ /6BF, ;n;z j * >æz >w 5 &vz >wj ~ ® (Mark et al., 1971). $, çbö 7j ¦B &j BF~ "ï Wj ËçÊ "ïb~ ïçj F«~² ~V *~ >Ö z¾Þ" ?f r¢Ò ÏöB ^Bz¢ ~ ® (Rouette,. R :J Ê bî F«  ڪ¶ ÊÆÖf 7'~, Ï~, ¢¦ G~ ^
(116) ãö
(117) >Ú ®º ©b Âb~ ~¾¢ > ®æò Û Êj î j^z~ ò . ÊÆÖj Ï~º RF¾ çb~ &f ² 2ª¢ ª ~F > ®º Ñ ®º , O, ² ª¢ v ® º çb~ BFª¢ . çb~ ¢ BFʺ &ö Bº ÊÆÖ~ ê« &æ B> ®æò 7 ê« &Ë ©bº ÊÆÖj Ï*B RFö ¦Oʺ O », ÊÆÖ jªj RFö *Òʺ O», ÊÆÖ" B3~ ª¶¢ b~ Òò ç B ê RFö 'ÏÊ º O», ÊÆÖ RF¢ O';¾ Bç; 7ö Î&~º O» ® (J?Á"ãB, 1997).. 2003).. º çb~ &v, ^Bz, Ò ECHö ~ ÊÆ Ö &v çb~ ßWö & . >æz >w, & vz >w, ^Bz >w" ?f çb~ j>&; 7ö Ê ÆÖj >' &v, OÊæ V~ çb~ ßWö Ê ÆÖ~ VËW ¦& V&B . öB ÒÏ &vB Epichlorohydrin(ECH)f ¢> "V/ &vB . ECHº non formalinê~ &vBB çb~ >æ&ö ë'b ô ÒÏNf b Luby ö ~ B amylose~ &v 5 *çj ÊÆÖ jª 5 RFö 'Ï, bWj ËçÎ .ê > ® (Mark et al.,. 5). 1971; Mayer · Kaplan, 1991; Wei et al., 1992).. Corresponding author; Shin-Hee Lee Tel. +82-53-950-6221, Fax. +82-53-950-6219 E-mail: [email protected]. V¢B öBº çbj ECH 5 ÊÆÖ bÏö. 660.
(118) ÊÆÖ L¾Ò* ç>~ æzö R \ Table 1. Fabric specification Fabric. Wave. Cotton. Plain. Yarn Number Warp 30'S. Weft 36'S. Fabric count (threads/5cm) Warp Weft 141 135. Weight 2 (g/m ). Û. 25 1. æ ê ê³>º ^Bz ;öB ;n;z, ^Bzº b &vzö ~ ÊÆÖj > ';Ò r FB>º B> bÒ' Wîj V~& . 2.. þÒò 5 O». ò # £ Wî" ZV"j 1N B ² óî(ÿçÒ("), ) f ª¶ï 50ò ç~ 2.¢ Ï~&b, ÊÆÖ 5 &v¾Ò ÒÏ>º ECH, .Ö, >Öz¾Þ, zêR f 1/ £j ;B ì & ÒÏ~& . Þ çbf 6 ~º ïçb~ R& W
(119) ¢ ÒÏ~& &NÏf Table 1" ? . 2.1.. ÊÆÖ *` ² óîöB Wî 5 ZV"j B Ê ºÂ Ê 2 .¢ >Öz¾Þ 50% >Ï, >wNê 110Û2 CöB 2 * ÿn î²&Ê¢ 80~100 ml/min~ ³ê "«~B Ê & >Öz¾Þ >Ïj 1:10b Fæ~ ¢~² v > >wÎ ê, 7W F Hræ >^, ~ ÊÆÖj B ~& . 2.2.. o. ç>~ ÊÆÖ L¾Ò ç>j B B ÊÆÖ 0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0%(w/w)f ECH 0, 1, 5, 10%(×10 M)¢ 2%.Ö>Ïö b Ï ö 1* ÿn Ϫ® æ r, manglej Ï~ {O 2bB ¾Òj RFÚ¦ö ¢~² RÚf > pick-upj 100% ¢;® ~ ç>~ bÏ Fïj ¢~² ~& . mangle roller¢ Û" ç>f 50 Cö 2ª * ZË ê, 20%(w/w)~ >Öz¾Þ >Ïö 2ª* æ~ ^Bz, ;n;z, Ò ÊÆÖ~ &vz¢ ÿ ö ¾Ò~& . 2.3.. -2. o. ÊÆÖ/; ~ ß#9ª+ : ÊÆÖ~ î j^zê 5 º 'F ª77êê(Jasco, Model FTS-65)¢ Ï base-line»ö ~ G;»b G;~& . 'F ª77êêö ~ G;f FTIR spectra ¦V 1,655 cm öB Amide I b, 2,867 cm öB CH»êÿö ~ bæz& î j^zê& ¸z¢ ê æz& 'f 6j J~ base linej ò ê 7ê~ j(Optical Density Ratio : ODR) ¯ 1655 cm öB 7êö & 2867 cm öB 7ê~ j& î j^zêf çF&ê 2.4.. -1. -1. -1. -1. 661. ö ® º ©j Ï~ G;~& (Mayer · Kaplan, 1991). Þ 6ê 5 ª¶ï G;f Ostwald; 6êê¢ Ï, ; ÊÆÖ Ï~ Fÿ*j G;~ F6ê[η]¢ êÖ~&b , 6ê ï ª¶ï(Mv)f Mark-Houwink Sakurada [η] = k · Mv ö ~ ï&~& . öBº k = 8.93×10 5 α = 0.71¢ ÒÏ~ 6ê 襁ïj êÖ~& (/o, 1995). B ÊÆÖ~ ßWf îj^zêº 85%, 6ê ï ª¶ïf £ 153,000& . ö ~R ç KES-FB(Kawabata Hand Evaluation System) > >9 ª+ : KES-FB1 tensile tester¢ Ï~ &Ë ~7j 500 gf/cm ræ æz* ã · *Ò OËb ËF; ê(LT), Ëö.æ(WT), Ëæ;(EM) 5 ˲ê(RT) ¢ G;~ ï~& . ç>~ £¾ßWf & 2.5 cm KES-FB2öB ã Ò · *ÒOËb~ £¾;W(B)" £¾ K(2HB)j G;, ï ~ ¾æÚî . ò~ *ßWj C~V *~ & ' 8 "Úæº KES-FB1öB ãÒ · *ÒOËb~ * ;W(G), *' 0.5 5 5 öB~ * K(2HG)j G;, ï~ ¾æÚî . ç>~ RßWf KES-FB4öB ãÒ · *ÒOËb~ î Vê>(MIU), Ò R V~ ïÞN(SMD)¢ G;, ï~ ¾æÚî . H îVßWf 7/¶¢ ÒÏ~ ò~ ËKj 20 gf/cm Fæ j 2 cm~ *Ïj 0.1 cm/sec ~ ¢;³ê æçB G;~& . ç>~ {»ßWf {»³ê 20 micron/sec {K 50 gf/ cm ö ²"; ?f ³ê G;>º KES-FB3öB {»F;ê(LC), {»²ê(RC)¢ G;~& . ç>~ vþß Wf &{K 0.5 gf/cm 5 50 gf/cm öB T , T ¢ G;~ & . α. -4. 2. -1. o. o. o. 2. 2. 3.. 2. 0. m. Ö # 8. ö ~R ÊÆÖ L ç>~ Ëß9 ËßWf ç>~ Ëÿ 5 ²ßW" &>º ç> ~ V' ßWb ç>~ ËWîj ¾æÚº ' ß W~öº LT(linearity), WT(tensile energy), EM(tensile strain), Ò RT(resilience)& ®b ÊÆÖ ¾Ò 5 &vB~ ³ê æzö 8 ç>~ LT, WT, EM, RT¢ '' Fig. 1ö ¾ æÚî . ÊÆÖb ¾Ò ãÖ, ¾Ò ÊÆÖ~ ¢;³êræº ¾Òö j ç>~ LT& Ã&~& ç~ ³êöB ê ÊÆÖ ª¶Ï~ îÎ"ö ~ LT~ ê³' Ã& & V&>îb¾ J®J 6²~ ÊÆÖ~ ¾Ò³ê& 0.5% ¢ ãÖö LT& &Ë ¸² ¾æÒ (Fig. 1(a)). Þ, &vB ³êö ~ ç>~ LT æzº Â] ¢&Wj æ pº ©b ¾æÒ . Fig. 1(b)º ÊÆÖb ¾Ò ãÖ, ¢; R&~7ö ¢ 3.1. KES.
(120) 662. R~~Öë²æ *6² *5^, 2004j. Fig. 1. Effect of epichlorohydrin concentration on tensile properties of cotton fabric : (a) LT(linearity), (b) WT(tensile energy), (c) EM(maximum value of tensile strain), (d) RT(resilience).. Hræ æ;Î ç>~ * ' Ëö.æ WT8j ¾ æÞ ©b ç>ö ¾Ò~º ÊÆÖ~ ¾Ò³ê& Ã&ö 8¢ 6²~º ãËj ¾æÚî . ©f ¢; R&~7ræ ËÒ H EM ' LT& 6² ©j ~~º, ÊÆ Ö ¾Òö ~ ÊÆÖ Ï RFö R>V º ç> ö ïj ;Wb ç> çÚ ~ ¶Fê& 6²>Ú Ëʺ ôf ¾ jº~V H^ ©b 6B . Þ, &vB¢ þ ¾Ò ãÖ, &vB öb®Ö~ ³ ê& Ã&ö 8¢ WT8 *>'b 6²~º ãËj & . &vB çb~ WT~ &~öf çbj W~ ® º RF~ jÖ;'ö ª¶* &vÖ W>ÚB K &rj H ¾ î Z &vÖöB wK÷7*çj ¢bÊV H^¢ '>, Þbº fJÊRF~ ;ê¢ Fæ~ ®º >²ÖK &vÖ ê«ö ~ & ~>, &~B ;ê& î Z &vÖK ãÖ öê ;K&~& ¢ÚÆ > ®j ©b 'B (Hall, 1966). Fig. 1(c)öBº Fig. 1(b)öB~ WT8" îR&æ ÊÆÖ~ ¾Ò³ê& Ã&> çbö ¢; R&~7j "Ú æ; Ò H~ æ; EM8 6²~º ãËj ¾æÚî . EM8f çb~ FW, æ;ÏW~ ¿êæ ÊÆÖ~ ¾ Ò³ê& Ã&ö 8¢ çb~ FW 6² ©b 6 B . Þ &vö ~ EM8f ~ æz& ìº ©b 6. B . çbö ¢; R&~7j "Ú æ;Î ê ~7j B ®j ãÖ~ ²ê¢ ¾æÚº RT8f ÊÆÖ ¾Ò³êf &vB~ ³ê& Ã&> Ã&~º ãËj " > ® (Fig. 1(d)).. RT~ Ã&º ²W Ã&~ ;n;W" ~>n;W ±jöj ~~ ©f &vBö ~ RF Ú &v& ;W >îV H^ ©b 6B . Ö" ÊÆÖ 5 &vB~ ¾Òö ~ ÊÆÖ ¶Ú &vö ~ ÚW Ãêf b Ê ÆÖ" fJʪ¶~ &v, fJÊ ª¶*~ &vö ~ f²W Ãêö V ©b 'B . Fig. 1(a), (b), (c), (d)~ Ö"¦V ÊÆÖ ¾Ò ³ê~ Ã&ö 8¢ ¢; R&~7ræ æ;8j H~ WT8¾ EM8 6²~º ©b¦V çb~ æ; ÚJÖ, RT& Ã&~º ©b¦ V ;n;W BFF ©b 6B (f«&Á*ÿö, 1997).. ö ~R ÊÆÖ L ç>~ £¾ß9 £¾(benbing)ßWf *ßW" z®Ú Ú"~ [ ;ê¢ ¾æÚº ßW~B ~OÏ ö &N>º n;W, .*W, fW ~ OÏWË"ê &ê& p . £ ¾ßWf RFf ~ £¾ßW, RFf RFÒ~ îVßW ö ~B 'Ëj Ab £¾;W(B)" £¾K(2HB)8j 3.2. KES.
(121) ÊÆÖ L¾Ò* ç>~ æzö R \. Û ç>~ FW, êKWj 6 > ® . Bf 2HB8 Ôb F~ êKW Ö>~ Ú~ F ;>º j ;W~æò >& 8 ¾ £&ææ p &Ú /6 Ã&~ Ú¦V *j Fæ*"Ú : ç¶;~ j ;W . º ß® N · Û ~.8 ~²Ò '~ ~.8ö OÏ ~º îç>öB " > ®º ßW . Fig. 2(a)f ÊÆÖ~ ¾Ò³êf &vB~ ³êæzö V ç>~ B~ æz¢ ¾æÞ ©b ÊÆÖ~ ¾Ò³ê& Ã& ö V¢ B& *&® Ã&~ ß® ÊÆÖ~ ³ê& 0.5%¢ ãÖö &Ë 8j ¾æÚî . B& º ©f ÿ¢ Kö & æ;ï ' º ©j ~~ $, ÿ¢ Kö & "ª~ · '² B j a . V¢B B& Ã&® º ©f ¾Ò
(122) ~ FW" ê KW 6²®rj ~~º, º ÊÆÖ~ R O R Ff RF* £¾ ßWö 'Ëj b " RF~ ¶Fê & 'Ú^ ³W æB ç>~ £¾ æ;ö & &K r8 r^b " > ® . f ? ÊÆÖ~ ¾Ò³êö V¢ B~ 8 N¢ æ ÊÆÖ~ ³ê& Bö 'Ëj ~ ®º ©b 6>, ö V¢ ÊÆÖ~ ³ê¢ .b B~ ª~ ' . &Ëî ©b .GB . Þ, &vB~ ³êö. V B~ 8f ÊÆÖ Î&>æ pf ãÖ, ¯ çb~ B ;n;z&~ ãÖ, &vB ³ê& Ã&ö V¢ ² 6²~º ãËj ¾æÚîb¾ ÊÆÖj
(123) ãÖöº Ã& ~º ãËj ¾æÚ ® . ©f ÊÆÖ Î&B ãÖ ^Bz ;öB çbò~ &vö ~ B ;n;z &f b ÊÆÖ Î&ö ~ ÊÆÖ" çb 5 ÊÆÖ ª¶¢Ò~ &vö ~ R O ö 8 ©b 6>, V¢B &vBö ~ B~ Ã&º b ÊÆÖ ¾Ò~ ÚW Ëç 8&B . Fig. 2(b)öB~ 2HB ßWf Bf ~ FÒ ãËj ® . ÊÆÖ Î&B ãÖ ZÎ&ö j~ 2HB& Ã& ~&b ©f ÊÆÖ~ Î& &K 66 ^ £ ¾²W 6²~& º ©j ~~ º £¾ æ;" ² "; 7ö B~º ö.æ ¶ ï ÊÆÖ ZÎ&~ ãÖ ÊÆÖ Î&ö j ç&'b 'f ©j ¾æÞ . Þ ÊÆÖ ¾Ò~ ãÖ &vB ³ê& Ã&ö V¢ 2HB8 Ã&~º ãËj ¾æÚ ® . ÊÆÖ &v ¾ÒB çbf ßW 8&F öò jî¢ Bf BH~ Ã&¦V 8>º çb~ f Úf ~*ö Ú¶ ;ê *j FæB"Ú N Û ªÆöê ~ÒòB~ Ïê & 8&B . ö ~R ÊÆÖ L ç>~ *ß9 º ÊÆÖ~ ¾Ò³êf &vB~ ³ê& Ã&ö V ç>~ *;W(G)~ æz¢ ¾æÞ © . Gº ç> ÒFb Kj A~j r ã, *Ò vN'~ æ;~ Ï ~ ¿ê& >º ©b ÊÆÖ~ ¾Ò³ê& Ã&> G & çß~º ãËj " > ® . ©f ÊÆÖ ç>j W~º RFf RFÒ, ". Òö ¦O>Ú îV&¾ ã, *Ò 7/{K ö 'Ëj "Ú ~ *æ;j Ú[² ~V r^b 6> G& ãÖ :ÚÊ OË~ æ; 'Ú ~B· ¾f j ¦ > ®j ©b 6B . Fig. 3(b)öB æº *K(2HG) ßW Gf FÒ ãËj ¾æÚî . 2HGº *æ;~ æ; 5 ²ö &ê>º ßWb 2HG& > ² ö.æ ¶ © j a~ ²>æ pf æ;ï ©j ~ . V¢B ²ßW öB 2HG8 ·j> FÒ~ . 2HG 8f ÊÆÖ~ ¾Ò³ê& 0.5%~ ãÖ ÊÆÖ Z¾Òf FÒ *ßWj ¾æÚîb 2%öB /Ï Ã&¢ ¾æÚî. . ö V¢ 2% ç~ ÊÆÖ ³êöBº *æ;ö & çb~ ²W *&® &~B º ©j r > ® . Þ &vB ³ê ¯ &vÎ"ö V 2HGæzº ~ ì º ©b ¾æÒ . f ?f *ßWf çb" Ú "~ z, .*W" &7 &ê& ®b £¾ßW" þ ~ ;WËö 7º 'Ëj & . 3.3. KES Fig. 3(a). Fig. 2. Effect of epichlorohydrin concentration on bending properties of cotton fabric : (a) B(bending rigidity), (b) 2HB(bending hysteresis).. 663.
(124) 664. R~~Öë²æ *6² *5^, 2004j. Fig. 3. Effect of epichlorohydrin concentration on shear properties of cotton fabric : (a) G(shear stiffness), (b) 2HG(hysteresis at shear angle 0.5 degree).. Fig. 4. Effect of epichlorohydrin concentration on surface properties of cotton fabric : (a) MIU(friction coefficient), (b) SMD(mean deviation of surface roughness).. ö ~R ÊÆÖ L ç>~ Rß9 ö ~ çb~ RßWj ¾æÚº ' ßW~º çb~ V bÒßWf b ï6" &N>º (handle)8 ö 7º 'Ëj ~º º² B, R~ îVßW ï îVê>(MIU)f V~' ºÆ ßW RV~ ïÞ N(SMD) b ¾æâ > ® . ÊÆÖ~ ¾Ò³ê 5 &v B~ ³êö V MIU G;~~ æz¢ Fig. 4(a)ö ¾æÚî. . ÊÆÖ~ ³ê& Ã&ö V¢ RßWç ïîVê> MIU8 Ã&~º ãËj " > ®º ©f çbRö ¦ Â>Ú ®~ RF& ÊÆÖö ~ Ú¶ ;ê z+>Ú ¢> çb~ îÎ"ö ~ îVê>& Ã&~² B ©b º GB . öb®Öö ~ &v& ê«B çb ~ MIU 8f &vB ³ê& Ôf 1%ræº Ã&~º ãËj & ç~ ³êöBº z>º *çj ¾æÚ ® . MIU8f >~& ·j> nj ~~º ªÆ çbB çb~ îVê>¢ çßʶ rö º öBf ? ÊÆÖ 5 &vB¢ Ï~º © : ²ç ©b ÒòB . Fig. 4(b)öº ~ V~' ºÆ, ¯ ~ V¢ ¾ æÚº SMD8j ¾æÚî . SMD8 ·j> ¢>'b. jÚ 6/j ¾æÚº çb¢ > ®b >& 8 > f çbªj a . ÊÆÖ~ ¾Òö ~ Ê ÆÖ ³ê 0.5%öBº ÊÆÖ Î&>æ pf çb" FÒ 8" ÿj ¾æÚîæò ³ê& 1%, 2% Ã&ö V ¢ SMD8 Ã&j " > ®º º ÊÆÖ z+ö ~. ² ®¢ b :6 ©j ~ . &vB~ ³êö V¢Bê ²~² SMD8 Ã&~&º º &vB~ Î& ÊÆÖ~ Oï Ã& ©ö V ©b 6B .. 3.4. KES KES. ö ~R ÊÆÖ L ç>~ {»ß9 {»ßWf çb~ ³ò6, çb~ vþ, "6" &7 & ê& ®Ú çb~ , ~OÏW, Ò /BW ö 'Ëj ~ $ ~OÏ ê ";öB B~º jç, f Ò .* ö 'Ëj . ßW j J~ ~~¾ ¢>' RFB®j Jê~ OÏW Ö> RFB® V&B . KESö ~ {»ßWj ¾æÚº ' ßW~öº {»F ;W(LC), {».îÒÞÊ(RC) Ò {»vþ& ®b ÊÆ Ö 5 &vB ¾Òö ~ ~ ßWj '' Fig. 5ö ¾æ Úî . ÊÆÖ~ ¾Ò³ê& Ã&ö V¢ LC& Ã&~, 3.5. KES.
(125) ÊÆÖ v¾Ò* ç>~ æzö &R . 665. Fig. 5. Effect of epichlorohydrin concentration on compression properties : (a) LC(linearity), (b) RC(regilience).. Fig. 6. Effect of epichlorohydrin concentration on thickness of cotton fabric : (a) thickness at pressure 0.5 gf/cm2, (b) thickness at pressure 50 gf/cm2.. &vB ³ê& Ã&ö 8¢ LC& Ã&~ &vB ³ê 5% öB R~ 8j ¾æÚî (Fig. 5(a)). LC8 Ã&~ { »Kö & æ; ÚJò z ôf "6 ¦F ©b 6B . Fig. 5(b)º ÊÆÖ~ ¾Ò³ê 5 &vB ³êö 8 {» ²ßW(RC)j ¾æÚî . ÊÆÖ ¾Ò³ê& ¸j> RC º Ã&~º ãËj ¾æÚîb ©f ÊÆÖ ³ê Ã&ö ~ ç>~ îÎ"ö V ©b 6B . ÊÆÖ~ ³ê& 2% ¸f ãÖöº &vB ³êö 8 Â] ßW f V > ìîb¾ ÊÆÖ ³ê& Ôf 'öBº &vB ³ê& Ã&ö 8¢ £* Ã&~º ãËj ¾æÚî . ÊÆÖ ³ê& ¸f ãÖº ç>ö &~ "ê ¾Òö ~ ®¢ö V ©b Òò>, ÊÆÖ ³ê& Ôf ' öBº ^B ; 7, &vB ê«ö ~ ç>~ ;n ;W Ã&º > ÊÆÖ >î"~ &vö ~ êW Ã& ©ö V ©b ÒòB . Fig. 6~ (a)f (b)º '' ~7 0.5 5 50 gf/cm öB ÊÆ Ö ³ê 5 &vB ³êö 8 vþ~ æz¢ ¾æÞ © . {»~7 0.5 gf/cm öBº ÊÆÖ ³ê& Ã&ö 8¢ vþ & Ã&~º ãËj ¾æÚîb &vB ³êö ~ Â] ãËf V > ìî . {»~7j 50 gf/cm Ã&Î ãÖ ÊÆÖ ³ê& Ã&. ö 8¢ {»~7 0.5 gf/cm º vþ~ Ã&ãË ~æò Ã&~º ãËj ¾æÚî . $ &vB ³ê~ Ã&f þ vþê Ã&~º ãËj ¾ æÚî . ÊÆÖ ³ê& Ã&ö 8¢ vþ& Ã&~º *ç f ÊÆÖ~ ç>~ f > z+ö ~ îÎ "f bï;Wö V ©b 6B . $ &vB ³ê& Ã&ö 8¢ vþ& Ã&~º ©f &vB& Î&B ÊÆÖ f > ç>" &vö ~ ÊÆÖ~ 5 z+~ Ú Wj Ãê* ï 5 bï~ vþ& Ã& ©ö V ©b 6B .. 2. 2. 2. 2. 4.. Ö V. ç>j ECH 5 ÊÆÖ bÏö æ~ &vz Ú " ÿö, ê³>º ^Bz ;öB ;n;z, ^Bz Î ç>~ KESö ~ >Ò' ßW 5 B ßWj ECH ³ê 5 ÊÆÖ ³êö 8¢ jv ¦Æ Ö" r" ?f Öj áî . 1. ÊÆÖ &v ç>~ ËßWöBº ÊÆÖ~ ³ê& à &ö 8¢ Ëö.æ(WT)f Ëæ;(EM) 6²~&b ˲ê(RT)º Ã&~& . $, ËF;ê(LT)º ÊÆ Ö ³ê 0.5%öB &Ë ¸~ ..
(126) 666. R~~Öë²æ *6² *5^, 2004j. 2. ÊÆÖ~ Î&º £¾;W(B)" £¾K(2HB)j Ã& 8b, ÊÆÖ Î&~ ãÖ &vB ³êÃ&f þ Bf 2HB ê Ã&~& . 3. *;W(G)" *K(2HG5)f ÊÆÖ ¾Ò³ê& à &> Ã&~&b &vö ~ ßW~ æzº ~ ìî. . 4. ÊÆÖ ¾Òö ~ *>'b ¾Òö j î Vê>(MIU)f V~ ïÞN(SMD)8 Ã&~& . &vB öb®Ö~ Î&ö ~ MIUº &vB ³ê & &³êöBº Ã&~º ãËj &b ç~ ³êö Bº zçö ê~& . Þ &vB Î&ö 8 SMD º £* Ã&~º ãËj & . 5. {»F;ê(LC)º ÊÆÖ~ ¾Ò³ê Ã&f þ Ã&~ &b, &vB ³ê& Ã&f þ Ã&~ &vB ³ê 5% öB ~ 8j ¾æÚî . {»²ê(RC)º ÊÆÖ ³ê 5 &vB ³ê Ã&f þ Ã&~º ãËj ¾æÚî . { »ö ~ vþæzº ÊÆÖ ³êÃ&f þ Ã&~&b, {»~7 50 gf/cm öBº &vB öb®Ö ³ê à &f þ Ã&~& . 2. ^^ò B«Á*ÿö (1997) A Study on the Change of Hand of Chitosan-. treated Fabrics-Polyester/Cotton Blend Fabric and Polyesgter Fabric-. J. Korean Fiber Soc., 32, 614-621. (1997) Chitin/Chitosan : Antimicrobial Properties and Applications. Polymer Science And Technology, 8, 591-595. Hall, A.J. (1966) “Textile Finishing”. 3rd Ed., American Elsevier, p.157. Mark, H, Wooding, N.S. and Atlas, S.M. (1971) “Chemical Aftertreatment of Textiles”. Wiley Interscience, New York, p.444. Mayer, J. and Kaplan, D. (1991) U.S. Pat. 5,015,293. Muzzarelli, R.A.A. (1957) “Chitin” Pergamon Press, p.30. Roberts, G. A. F.(1992) “Chitin Chemistry”. Macmillan Press Ltd., p. 6. Rouette, H.K. (2003) “Encyclopedia of Textile Finishing”. Springer, New York, pp.1343-1354. Wei, Y.C., Hudson, S.M., Mayer, J.M. and Kaplan, D.L. (1992) The Crosslinking of Chitosan Fibers, Part A: Polymer Chemistry. J. of Polym. Sci., 30, 2187-2193. ”. (1995) “ ( ), , pp.275-277. (2004 7 1 ). J?Áã*. GoÛì v¼¿ v~¼ ¼x ·æ¦, v 𠼿 v~¼©È j ú ¢ %>.
(127)
관련 문서
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of the transformationa l leadership of a dance leader on the empowerment of professional dancers and
Noorul Haq : Effect of friction welding parameters on mechanical and metallurgical properties of ferritic stainless steel, The international journal of
Bactericidal effect of photocatalytic reactor depending on the UV-A illumination time and flow rate of V.. Bactericidal effect of photocatalytic reactor
In this study, using concept mapping of a variety of learning techniques in the area of science, especially biology, has a positive effect on learning
The data are corrected for temperature error due to solar radiation and the effect of low temperature on the anerod capsule and curvature of the surface of
Contact angles on the surface of PLLA, PLLA/Chitosan, NH₂ treated PLLA, and NH₂treted PLLA/Chitosan
근래에 연구되는 격자형 모델은 각 경계범위에서 각기 다른 변수의 영향을 정확 하게 산출하지 못하고 있으나 , 수용모델링을 병행하는 경우 높은 정확도를 추정할
1 John Owen, Justification by Faith Alone, in The Works of John Owen, ed. John Bolt, trans. Scott Clark, "Do This and Live: Christ's Active Obedience as the