• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Youth justice orders and supervision periods: 2013–14

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Youth justice orders and supervision periods: 2013–14"

Copied!
3
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

Youth justice orders and supervision periods: 2013–14 Youth justice fact sheet no. 45

Youth justice orders and supervision periods: 2013–14

This fact sheet summarises information on the number of supervised orders administered by state and territory youth justice agencies, and the periods of supervision experienced by young people in 2013–14.

To some extent, differences between states and territories in the numbers and types of legal orders can reflect differences in legislation and legal and administrative practices. Detailed information on the number and types of legal orders available in each state and territory can be found at <http://www.aihw.gov.au/youth-justice/services-and-outcomes>.

Supervised orders

In 2013–14, a total of 9,907 young people under youth justice supervision were supervised under 50,912 orders (Western Australia and the Northern Territory are not included in this fact sheet as data were not available; see Box 1).

This equates to about 5 orders per person, on average (tables S1 and S25).

On an average day, more than 4 in 5 young people under youth justice supervision (86%) were supervised in the community (tables S1 and S36). Despite this, the majority (59%) of the orders active during the year were detention orders (Figure 1). Detention orders active during the year were mostly unsentenced orders (77%), while the majority of community-based orders were sentenced (83%).

Notes

1. Western Australia and the Northern Territory did not supply standard data for inclusion in the Juvenile Justice National Minimum Data Set (JJ NMDS) for 2013–14 and are therefore not included in this figure.

2. Totals for community-based, detention and orders active include orders with ‘other’ legal status.

Source: Table S25.

Figure 1: Supervised orders, by order type and legal status, Australia (excluding WA and NT), 2013–14 Community-based orders

21,065 (41%) Detention orders

29,847 (59%) Orders active during the year

50,912

Sentenced community orders

17,412 (83%) Sentenced detention orders

6,716 (23%) Unsentenced community orders

3,619 (17%)

Unsentenced detention orders 23,131 (77%)

(2)

Youth justice orders and supervision periods: 2013–14 2 In New South Wales and South Australia, most active orders were detention orders (70% and 56% respectively)

(Table S25). In Tasmania, Victoria, the Australian Capital Territory and Queensland, the majority of active orders were community-based (74%, 61%, 58% and 53% respectively).

Nearly two-thirds (63%) of young people under youth justice supervision during 2013–14 had multiple supervision orders (Table S26). The proportion of Indigenous young people with multiple orders was higher than for

non-Indigenous young people (71% compared with 61%).

Young people who were supervised in the community had fewer orders, on average, during the year than those in detention (2.4 orders per person compared with 7.4) (tables S25, S36 and S75). They were more likely than those in detention to have had only 1 order during the year (48% compared with 19%) (Table S26). Over 2 in 5 young people with a detention order (44%) had 5 or more orders, compared with just 7% of those under community-based supervision.

Periods of supervision

Young people may be on any number and type of orders at any one time, but they may not serve the full duration of these orders for several reasons. Firstly, community-based orders may be interrupted by time spent in detention.

Secondly, the full duration of a sentenced detention order may not be served where the young person is released on parole or supervised release. The actual time spent under continuous supervision is referred to as a supervision period.

In 2013–14, the 9,907 young people under supervision experienced 12,713 periods of supervision, which equates to about 1.3 periods per person, on average (tables S1 and S27).

Among young people who completed a period of supervision in 2013–14, most (85%) completed only one period (Table S28). Among all those under supervision in 2013–14, about 61% completed at least one period of community-based supervision, and 38% completed a period of detention (tables S1, S63 and S102).

Young people in unsentenced detention during the year completed more periods, on average, than those in

sentenced detention (1.9 compared with 1.2) (tables S117 and S124). Young people in unsentenced detention who had completed at least one period were more likely to have completed multiple periods than those in sentenced detention (44% compared with 18%) (tables S116 and S123).

Indigenous young people were more likely than non-Indigenous young people to have completed multiple periods of supervision (20% compared with 13%) (Table S28). This was the case in both community-based supervision (30%

compared with 19%) and detention (47% compared with 40%) (tables S63 and S102).

Box 1: Youth justice supervision fact sheets

This is one of a series of fact sheets on youth justice supervision in 2013–14 published by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). These fact sheets can be downloaded free of charge from the AIHW website at

<http://www.aihw.gov.au/youth-justice/fact-sheets>.

The fact sheets form part of the Youth justice in Australia 2013–14 release, which also includes a bulletin, supplementary tables and web pages released in multiple stages throughout the year.

(See <http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/youth-justice>.)

Western Australia and the Northern Territory did not supply standard data for 2013–14 but non-standard data from these two jurisdictions have been included where possible.

The supplementary data tables (those with a prefix of S) referred to in this fact sheet accompany the bulletin Youth justice in Australia 2013–14, and can be downloaded from <http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/

?id=60129550638&tab=3>.

For more information about young people under youth justice supervision, see <http://www.aihw.gov.au/youth-justice>.

(3)

Youth justice orders and supervision periods: 2013–14 3 Box 2: Technical notes

1. Information about young people under youth justice supervision in this fact sheet is based on data from the Juvenile Justice National Minimum Data Set (JJ NMDS). This data collection contains information about all young people who were supervised by state and territory youth justice agencies in Australia, both in the community and in detention.

2. This fact sheet uses an ‘average day’ measure to illustrate the number of young people under supervision. The average day measure reflects the number of young people under supervision on a typical day during the year, and gives an indication of the average number of young people supported by the supervision system at any one time.

It is a summary measure that reflects both the number of young people supervised and the amount of time they spent under supervision.

Further technical and data quality information, including definitions of key terms in this fact sheet, is available from

<http://www.aihw.gov.au/youth-justice/data-quality>.

© Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2015

This product, excluding the AIHW logo, Commonwealth Coat of Arms and any material owned by a third party or protected by a trademark, has been released under a Creative Commons BY 3.0 (CC BY 3.0) licence (<http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/>). You may distribute, remix and build upon this work. However, you must attribute the AIHW as the copyright holder of the work in compliance with our attribution policy available at <www.aihw.gov.au/copyright/>. The full terms and conditions of this licence are available at <http://creativecommons.org/

licenses/by/3.0/au/>.

Suggested citation

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2015. Youth justice fact sheet no. 45. Youth justice orders and supervision periods: 2013–14. Cat. no. JUV 64.

Canberra: AIHW.

ISBN 978-1-74249-770-9 (PDF) ISSN 2202-1841

Any enquiries about copyright and/or this fact sheet should be directed to the Head of the Digital and Media Communications Unit, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, GPO Box 570, Canberra ACT 2601, Tel: (02) 6244 1000, Email: <[email protected]>.

참조

관련 문서

우리나라는 건강보험 보장비율이 낮고 본인부담금이 정률제로 운용되고 있다. 고액진료비 부담으로 빈곤이 악화되고 생계위협을 받 는 상황이 발생함에

Responsible for the management and supervision of yearly maintenance shutdown of wastewater treatment plant and facilities project execution to ensure that safety precautions

EU-Brazil workshop: coordinated call on advanced biofuels Presidency of the Council of the EU, Events/Conf/Fairs, Culture, education and youth, Justice and citizens

가해자 처벌 목표 피해 회복 강제적 책임수행 방식 자발적 책임. 처벌기관

• 더 이상 관념적인 논의만으로는 학교폭력을 해결할 수 없으며, 현재 공교육과 국가차원의 대처방안으로써는 피해자와 가해자 그리고 공동체가 함께 공감할 수 있는 해결책을 제시하지

The 14 th and 15 th as well as (largely) the 17 th centuries were periods of economic regression, characterised by a retreat, recession or decline

The language of the journey is used as indicative of the reality that transformation and achievement of equality and justice are actually a process not necessarily a once

14 The off- diagonal elements of G were neglected in a previous study.3 The normal coordinates are most suitable for the simulation of linear and