116
SUMMARY
International Comparative Study for Managing and Developing National Land
-Focused on Japan, Germany, and USA.-
Jisoo Sim, Saeha Moon
Key words: National Land, Federal Land, Land Management, Best Practice Analysis
The purpose of this study is to propose how to manage national land by comparing USA. Japan, and Germany’s cases. In terms of the public land, every country shares the same definition that the public land means the land what is owned by the country. I n general national land can be divided into two ways, administrative land and general land. Administrative land includes the land that will be or is used for administration. General land means all land that is owned by the country except administrative land.
In this sense, this study selected three countries to compare each country’s national land and its management. Japan has been selected as a case, since Japan shares the same law system with Korea. USA. has been included for learning the best practice of national land management. Germany has been selected for historical implication that it has the same historical background with Korea in terms of divided country.
The authors compared the differences between three countries focused on
SUMMARY ･ 117 two ways. First one is management system of nationa land and this can be divided into four: 1) laws related to national land, 2) policy, 3) management governance, and 4) management system. Then, the authors compared practical cases which provide impirical implications for how to use national land.
As a result, Japan shows the highest efficient management of public land among three countries. Germany shows the lowest efficient management of national land, since the country aims to sell the most national land for saving the country’s wealth. USA shows the various ways to serve public goods by using national land such as CDCs. Based on these, the authors provided several implications for managing national land in Korea. First, promoting development of national land by allowing long-term lease and private participation is needed in Korea. Second, constructing the database and allowing access of public is needed. Third, further studies in using national land is needed for providing developed implications.
