서 론
1960
, . 40
1,2)
. ,
,
(Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial, RCT) Randomized Clinical Controlled Trials with Herbal Acupuncture
(Pharmacopuncture) in Korea - A Systematic Review
Bong-Ky Park, Jung-Hyo Cho, Chang-Gue Son
Department of Liver-Immunity in Oriental Medicine College, Daejeon University
Objective: By assessing the quality of methodology and synthesis of results of RCTs (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials) with herbal acupuncture (pharmacopuncture), we hope to help with administrating herbal acupuncture therapy in clinic and conducting RCT with herbal acupuncture.
Methods: Reports of RCT conducted in Korea published in medical journals until February 2009 were collected. We surveyed elementary information of RCTs, evaluated randomization, double-blinding, allocation concealment and put together the results of RCTs by seven clinical topics.
Results: 38 RCTs with herbal acupuncture were selected, then adequate methods for randomization and allocation concealment were found in 39% and 5% of studies. Complete double-blinding and a clear accounting of all participants were conducted in 42% and 50% of reports. The synthesis of RCTs revealed that herbal acupuncture was useful and effective on degenerative gonarthritis, omarthralgia on cerebrovascular accident, acute ankle sprain, back sprain, neck sprain, headache, rheumatoid arthritis and tennis elbow, generally.
Conclusions: Although further improvement in quality of methodology of RCTs with herbal acupuncture is required, clinical usefulness of herbal acupuncture was shown especially on disorders of musculoskeletal system via RCTs.
Key Words : herbal acupuncture, pharmacopuncture, RCT, randomized clinical controlled trial, systematic review 박봉기, 조정효, 손창규
대전대학교 한의과대학 간장면역학교실 Original Article
Received:29 June 2009 Revised:30 July 2009 Accepted:30 July 2009
Correspondence to:손창규(Chang-Gue Son)
(301-724) 대전시 중구 대흥동 22-5번지 대전대학교 부속한방병원 간장면역학교실
Tel:+82-42-229-6807, Fax:+82-42-254-3403, E-mail:[email protected]
3)
.
.
,
.
Jadad score , ,
1 ,
1
5
4).
30%
5),
, ,
6-9)
. 2009 2
, , , ,
, , Jadad score, ,
, RCT
.
연구방법 1. 연구방법
‘ ’, ‘ ’,
‘ ’, ‘
’ ’, ‘ ’, ‘ ’, ‘pharm- acopuncture’, ‘herbal acupuncture’ ,
30
15 .
2. 연구 내용
1) RCT
RCT ,
, , , ,
. .
2) RCT
, ,
, .
A, B
10)
. ,
, ,
. central office
,
11)
.
3)
38 RCT
,
, , , ,
6
. RCT
, table Jadad
score .
결 과
1. 약침 관련 RCT 기본 정보
136 RCT
39 ,
1 38
12-49)
. (Fig. 1) 2000 5 ,
2008 18 , RCT 2003 2
2008 13 . (Fig. 2)
19 , 14
, ,
, ,
1 . 20~29 13
, 70 3 . (Fig. 3)
25
7 , ,
, 4 ,
3 , , ,
1 . 13
5 , 4 , ,
, , 1
. (Fig. 3)
20
15
10
5
~2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Number
of RCT Clinical trial RCT
Year
Fig. 2.
Screening titles/abstracts
Included titles/abstracts
N=136
Screening full-text articles N = 39
Studied available for data
N = 38
Excluded article N = 1 No randomized Excluded articles
N = 97 No randomized
Fig. 1.
17 SBV (Sweet Bee Venum) 8 ,
, , 3 ,
, , 2 ,
, , 1 .
16
, 7 ,
4 , , , 1
. (Fig. 4)
2. 연구 방법의 질에 대한 분석
Jadad score 5 3 , 4 7 , 3
12 , 2 5 , 1 11 .
16 , 22
. 16
15 .
48) 19)
1
, 3
.
Bee Venom
17 etc.
11
HP
‡3
HHD 3
WG
*3
Sweet Bee Venom
8
Not using
4 etc.
3
Normal Saline Bee 16
Venom 7
Acu
§7
Fig. 4.
etc.
7 (18%)
Gonarthrit is 7 (18%)
Omarhragia on CVA 4 (10%) Ankle sprain
4 (11%) Back
pain 4 (11%) Neck pain 3 (8%) Heart rate
variability 5 (13%) Safety &
side effect 4 (11%)
60~69 3 (8%)
> 70 3 (8%)
50~59 4 (11%)
20~29 13 (34%)
30~39 8 (21%) 40~49
7 (18%)
Fig. 3.
19 . (Table 1)
3. 주제별 연구 결과
1) 7
, SBV, . 3
,
1
. SBV 2 , ,
.
. (Table 2)
2)
3 2
, 1
. 1
. (Table 2)
3)
4 2
, 1 ,
1
. (Table 2)
4)
SBV 2
SBV
. 1
, 1
. (Table 2) 5)
2 SBV 1 SBV
, SBV
. 1
. (Table 2) 6)
, , , , ,
, RCT
1 .
.
.
4
Main Factors Yes (Adequate)
Nunber (%)
No (Inadequate) Number (%) Described as
randomized 38 (100%) 0 (0%)
Randomization scheme described and appropriate 16 (42%) 22 (58%)
Allocation concealment method 2 (5%) 36(95%)
Double-blind 16 (42%) 22 (58%)
Double blinding appropriate 15 (39%) 1 (3%)
A description of dropouts and withdrawals 19 (50%) 19 (50%)
Table 1.
,
.
,
, ,
, ESR (Erthrocyte Sedime- ntation Rate) CRP (C-Reactive Protein)
, ,
,
. (Table 2)
Questions Author (Reference)
Jadad score
Pharmacopuncture (Control)
Subjects Duration
(Times)
Conclusion
Degenerative gonarthritis
Yang KR (13) 3 Bee Venom (Acupuncture)
33
4 wks (8) More effective in Bee Venom than warm acupuncture
Kim SC (14) 3 SBV
*(Bee Venom)
30 2 wks (6)
More effective in SBV than Bee Venom on pain and side effect
Na WM (15) 1 SBV
(Bee Venom)
36 2 wks (6)
More effective in Bee Venom than SBV SBV let down side effect
An BJ (17) 3 Bee Venom
(Acupuncture)
30
1 wk (2~3) More effective in Bee Venom than acupuncture Lee SN (18) 1 Bee Venom
(SBV)
50
1 wk (2~3) More effective in Bee Venom than SBV
Omarthralgia on CVA
Ko CN (19) 5 Bee Venom
(Normal saline)
43
2 wks (6) More effective in Bee Venom than normal saline Eom JY (20) 1 Bee Venom
(Acupuncture)
30
4 wks (12) More effective in Bee Venom than acupuncture on pain
Ankle sprain
Song HS (25) 5 Bee Venom (Acupuncture)
24
1 wk (7) More effective in Bee Venom than acupuncture
Lee H (26) 1 Bee Venom
(Acupuncture)
32 no data (4)
More effective in Bee Venom than acupuncture (partly significant)
Back pain
Kim JH (27) 2 SBV
(Bee Venom)
39
2 wks (4) More effective in Bee Venom than SBV
Lee TH (29) 3 SBV
(Bee Venom)
24
no data (4) No significant effect Kim KT (30) 2 Bee Venom
(Acupuncture)
24
10 days (5) More effective in Bee Venom than acupuncture
Neck Pain
Song BY (32) 2 SBV
(Normal saline)
25 no data (5)
More effective in SBV than normal saline after 5th treatment
Kim KT (33) 4 Bee Venom (Normal saline)
21
no data More effective in Bee Venom than normal saline
Headache Kim HK (36) 1 HHD
‡(Normal saline)
26
1 wk (4) More effective in Hwangryunhaedok than normal saline Tennis elbow An GH (38) 1 Bee Venom
(Acupuncture)
24
no data More effective in Bee Venom than acupuncture Rheumatoid Lee SH (39) 3 Bee Venom
(Acupuncture)
69 8 wks (16)
More effective in Bee Venom than acupuncture after 2 month
SBV
*: Sweet Bee Venom, CVA : Cerebro-Vascular Accident, HHD
‡: Hwangryunhaedok-tang
Table 2.
고 찰
50)
. 168
50)
. 1950 ,
, 1967
50)
.
.
, .
RCT 2003
RCT
.
38 6
9 RCT
.
19 , 14
,
25 4 6
,
. ,
, , ,
,
. 25 SBV
.
8 1~3 ,
, , , ,
RCT
. 20~39
50 10 .
51)
.
RCT
16 , 42%
. 16
random table ,
, A, B
. , 2
.
. 50%
100%
11)
,
58%, 42%
50%
9)
.
52)