관상 동맥 질환 입원 환자의 관리
연세대학교 세브란스 병원 심장 내과
김 중 선
Definition of Angina
: A pain or discomfort in the chest or
adjacent areas caused by insufficient
blood flow to the heart muscle.
Myocardial O2 demand
Myocardial O2 supply
Pathogenesis of Angina
The ischemic Cascade
Accurate History Taking is the most important Clue to Diagnosis
1. History taking
2. Physical examination 3. ECG
4. Chest X-ray
5. Serum markers
6. Echocardiography, CT, MRI
7. Exercise ECG, Myocardial spect
8. Coronary Angiography
Classification of Chest Pain
Typical angina (definite)
- Substernal chest discomfort with a characteristic quality and duration
- Provoked by exertion or emotional stress and - Relieved by rest or nitroglycerin
Atypical angina (probable)
Meets 2 of the above characteristics Noncardiac chest pain
Meets ≤1 of the typical angina characteristics
61세 남자 환자가 1년전 부터의 운동시
발생하는 흉통을 주소로 내원하였다 . 상기
환자는 60 PY의 heavy smoker 였다.
ECG
BP 140/80 HR : 60/min
TMT : resting
Electrical Conduction System
TMT : stage IV ( 11:45 )
BP 170/90 HR : 133/min THR : 136/min
Chest discomfort
TMT : recovery ( 16:03 )
BP 150/80 HR : 80/min
Total exercise time : 12 min
Chest discomfort during exercise HR achieved 133/min
Target HR 136/min
Tc-99m Myocardial SPECT (MIBI)
A moderate sized, moderate degree,
reversible defect in the inferior wall.
Stress
Rest
Coronary Angiography
CAD(2VD): Near total occlusion of dRCA
Tubular eccentric up to 90% L/N of Big diagnoal br.
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
PTCA c stent at d-RCA (Nobori 3.5 * 24)
Ischemic Discomfort
Current Concept of Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndrome
ST Elevation No ST Elevation
Myocardial Infarction
Non Q MI Q MI
Unstable Angina
NSTEMI
25%
75% 25% 75%
Spectrum of ACS
Definition of Unstable Angina
i) Rest angina (usually prolonged >20 min) ii) New onset angina (within 2 months)
iii) Rapidly increasing or crescendo angina
iv) 정상 범위 심근 효소 수치
Printzmetal’s Variant Angina
젊고 운동과 관련이 없는 환자에서 주로 새벽에 발생하는 흉통일 경우 의심해야 한다.
전날 음주 후 잘 발생하는 경향이 있다.
치료는 Calcium channel blocker와 nitrate를 사용 (alpha-blocker도 사용 가능)
Beta-blocker 및 aspirin은 사용하지 않는 것이 좋다
2002 ACC/AHA UA/NSTEMI Guidelines
IC ergonovine 50 µg 2
nddose Baseline
I II III aVR aVL aVF V1 V2
V3 V4 V5 V6
IC NTG 200 µg
안정형 협심증 환자의 진단 방법
Clinical evaluation History and physical ECG and lab. findings
Assessment of ischemia Exercise ECG
or
Pharmacologic stress or Exercise stress imaging
If Unstable syndrome;
ACS management algorithm
Reassess likelihood of ischemia as cause of symptoms
Suspected HF, prior MI, abnormal ECG or clinical exam, HTN or
DM
Echocardiography (or MRI)
to asscess structural or functional heart disease
Evaluate prognosis on basis of clinical evaluation and non-invasive tests
If Ventricular function assess not already performed at this stage
2006 ESC guideline on the management of stable angina
Summary of test characteristics in patients with angina
Diagnosis of CAD
Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
Exercise ECG (운동 부하 검사) 68 77
Exercise echo 80~85 84~86
Exercise myocardial
perfusion 85~90 70~75
Dobutamine stress echo
(도부타민 부하 심초음파) 40~100 62~100
Vasodilator stress echo 56~92 87~100
Vasodilator stress
myocardial perfusion (아데노신
부하 심근 관류 스캔 ) 83~94 64~90
Patient with ischemic type discomfort
Assess initial 12-lead ECG
ST elevation ECG strongly suspicious for ischemia
(ST depression, T inversion) Nondiagnostic ECG Rapid triage to “urgent care” room
Aspirin 160-325 mg chewed Baseline cardiac enzymes
Initiate
reperfusion strategy Thrombolysis
Primary PTCA
Admit
Initiate antiischemic therapy Continue evaluation in ER Follow-up cardiac enzymes Echocardiography
Evidence of ischemia/infarction (?)
Yes No
Discharge Admit
Initiate reperfusion strategy if ST elevation develops
Routine Labs
가슴 통증을 주소로 응급실 내원한 환자
Goal = 10 minutes
ATP
Necrotic
myocardium
Ischemic myocardium potentially salvageable by intervention
1 2 3 4 5 6 12 18 24 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6
20 40 60 80 100
% o f p re -is ch em ic st at e
Hours Days
// // // // //
Reversible injury Wks
Irreversible injury
Ischemic myocardium potentially salvageable by reperfusion
Potentially benefits of late reperfusion
“Time is Myocardium !”
Management of STEMI
Pharmacologic reperfusion
Mechanical reperfusion
Thrombolysis
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
C.C. Chest pain for 3 hours
Risk factor DM(+), HTN(-), Smoking(-)
Lab CK/CK-MB/TnT 116 / 3.43/ < 0.01
=> f/u CK-MB 314.30 ( 6 hour) ECG ST elevation V2~V5
Diagnosis STEMI
M/58 Lee JW
ECG Changes in Anterior Infarction
Reciprocal change
ST elevation
Primary PCI
Guiding : JLG 7-4, GW : Pilot
Balloon predilation : 2.5 x 20mm
ECG Changes in Inferior Infarction
Primary PCI
Diffuse or multiple intermediate lesions
We need anti-anginal medication
Even in this era of advanced revascularization
Case 1
M/63
CC: DOE
PI
상기 63세 남환 HTN, DM 과거력 있으며 1년전 부터 계단
오를 때 운동시 호흡 곤란 및 흉통을 주소로 타병원에서
촬영한 CT 상 m-LAD 80% stenosis된 소견 보여 전원됨 .
Case 1
Case 1
Case 1
Stable angina Minimal CAD HTN
DM
Case 1
약물 치료
Aspirin protect 100 mg #1
Plavix 75mg #1 -> 꼭 필요하지 않음.
Concor 2.5 mg #1 – Beta blocker Crestor 10 mg #1 - Statin
Micardis 40 mg #1 - ARB Januvia 100 mg #1
Amaryl 2 mg/T
Case 2
M/58
CC
Chest pain
PI
상기 58세 남환은 고혈압으로 투약 하던 중 2시간 가량의
흉통이 있어 타병원 내원하여 시행한 EKG 상 II, III, aVF ST
분절 상승 소견으로 본원 응급실로 전원됨.
Case 2
Case 2
Case 2
STEMI CAD-1vd
s/p PTCA c stent at dRCA (*Orsiro 3.0*22)
HTN
Case 2
약물 치료
Aspirin protect 100 mg #1
Plavix 75mg #1 -> Ticagrelor 180 mg #2 or Prasugrel 10 mg #1
Concor 2.5 mg #1 - Beta blocker
Sigmart 10 mg #2 – 혹은 Nitrate
Rousuvastatin 20 mg #1 - Statin
Acertil 2 mg #1 – ACE inhibitor
Case 3
M/63
CC
Chest discomfort
PI
상기 환자는 고혈압, 심방세동으로 투약 중이며 3개월 전
부터 계단 오를 시 흉통 증상이 있었고 최근 악화되는 소
견으로 Coronary CT 시행 후 관상 동맥 협착 소견으로 본원
전원됨.
Case 3
Case 3
Case 3
Unstable angina CAD(3VD)
s/p PTCA c stent p~d LCx (Xience Prime 3.0*38) mRCA (Xience Prime 3.5*23) HTN A.Fib
Old Tb
s/p Cholecystectomy
Case 3
약물 치료
Warfarin 2.5 mg #1 -> NOAC으로 사용 가능
Aspirin protect 100 mg #1 -> Ischemic risk 와 bleeding risk
Plavix 75mg #1
Amosartan 5/100 1T #1 – CCB and ARB
Dilatrend SR 16 mg #1 – Beta-blocker
Lipitor 80 mg #1 - Statin
Anti-Platelet Agents
Antiplatelet & antithrombotic therapy
Antiplatelet & antithrombotic therapy
Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration. BMJ.
Aspirin Meta-analysis of 287 RCT involving 135,000 patients
Dose of Aspirin in ACS – CURRENT-OASIS 7
Mehta SR, et al. N Eng J Med 2010;363:930-42
High dose: 300-325 mg/d vs Low dose: 75-100 mg/d
Increase minor bleeding (5 vs 4.4 %; HR 1.13, 95 %
CI 1.00-1.27, p=0.04)
Antiplatelet & antithrombotic therapy
CLARITY
2005
PCI-CLARITY
2007
COMMIT
2005
CURE
2001
CREDO
2002
CAPRIE
1996
CHARISMA
2006
Occluded artery 36% D/MI/UR/
RI 20%
Mortality 46 %
Mortality 7%
D/MI/Stroke 20%
D/MI/Stroke 27%
D/MI/Stroke Vasc
9%
D/MI/Stroke Vasc
Benefit in symptomatic
patients
Clopidogrel
Acute STEMI NSTEMI / ACS PCI Post MI High Risk of Event
D, cardiovascular death; MI, myocardial infarction; UR, urgent revascularization; RI, recurrent ischemia.
BMS History of Stent thrombosis
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
PS
11991
STRESS
21993
Colombo
31995
STARS
51997
St en t t hr om bo si s (% )
16%
3.5%
1.6% 0.8% 0.6%
ISAR
41996
Coumadin High-pressure balloons and Ticlopidine and Clopidogrel
1. Schatz et al. Circulation.1991;83:148; 2. Fischman et al. N Engl J Med. 1994;331496; 3. Colombo et al. Circulation.1995;91:1676;
4. Schömig et al.Circulation.1994,90:2716; 5. Leon et al. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1665;
0
5 10 15
0 30 60 90 180 270 360 450
HR 0.81 (0.73-0.90) P=0.0004
Prasugrel Clopidogrel
Days
En dp oi nt (% )
12.1 9.9
HR 1.32 (1.03-1.68) P=0.03
Prasugrel
Clopidogrel 1.8
2.4
138 events
35 events
Balance of Efficacy and Safety
CV Death / MI / Stroke
TIMI Major
NonCABG Bleeds
NNT = 46
NNH = 167
ARR=0.6%
RRR=12%
P=0.045
HR: 0.88 (95% CI, 0.77−1.00)
ARR=1.9%
RRR=16%
NNT=54*
P<0.001
HR: 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77–0.92)
Wallentin L, et al. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1045–1057.
Both groups included aspirin.
*NNT at one year.
PLATO: Primary Efficacy Endpoint
(Composite of CV Death, MI, or Stroke)
Months After Randomization
C u m u la ti ve In c id en ce ( % )
8,521 8,628
8,362 8,460
8,124 6,6506,743
5,096 5,161
4,047 4,147 8,219
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 13
11.7 Clopidogrel
9.8 BRILINTA
0–12 Months 0–30 Days
4.8 5.4
Clopidogrel
BRILINTA
No. at risk ClopidogrelBRILINTA
9,291 9,333
P2Y12 Inhibitors
Clopidogrel Prasugrel Ticagrelor
Class Thienopyridine Thienopyridine Thienopyrimidine Reversibility Irreversible Irreversible Reversible
Activation Prodrug
Limited by metabolism
Prodrug Not limited by
metabolism Active drug
Onset of effect 2-4 h 30 min 30 min
Duration of effect 3-10 days 5-10 days 3-4 days
Withdrawal before
major surgery 5 days 7 days 5 days
Euro Heart J 2011;32:2999-3054
• Diagnosis
Unstable angina CAD (2VD)
S/P PTCA c stent at mLAD (Cypher 3*23), pLCX (Express 4.5*24) (2004.7)
HTN
Brief history
Coronary Angiography
Initial CAG After thrombosuction
항혈소판 제제 사용시 고려 사항
임상 양상 : 안정형 협심증 vs. 급성 관동맥 증후군
스텐트의 종류
동반 질환
Stable angina (모든 환자)
Aspirin 사용은 권고 한다 .
Clopidogrel 은 Aspirin 사용이 어려운 경우 대체로 사용 할 수 있다 .
2013 ESC Guideline
Stable angina (스텐트 시술 환자)
2013 ESC Guideline
Aspirin과 Clopidogrel 복합사용은 권고 한다.
혈소판 기능 검사는 특별한 경우에 한해서 시행 할 수 있다.
Acute coronary syndrome
• Unstable angina
와Non ST Elevation myocardial infarction
2014 ESC Guideline
Aspirin 과 Ticagrelor 나 Prasugrel 12 개월 복합사용은 권고
Ticagrelor 나 Prasugrel 사용이 어려울 경우 Clopidogrel 사용 권고
Acute Coronary Syndrome
ST elevation myocardial infarction
2014 ESC Guideline
Aspirin 과 Ticagrelor 나 Prasugrel 12 개월 복합사용은 권고
Ticagrelor 나 Prasugrel 사용이 어려울 경우 Clopidogrel 사용 권고
처음 발견 즉시 P2Y 12 억제제 사용 권고
Special conditions (Non-valuar atrial fibrillation)
2014 and 2015 ESC Guideline
Stable angina
의 경우는HAS-
BLED score
와 관계없이적어도
1
개월Triple anti- coagulation
권고AF에서는 3제 사용시 Ticagrelor 나 Prasugrel 사용은 권고하지 않음
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy
2014 ESC/EACTS Guideline (유럽 지침)
Anti-Anginal Medications
LH Opie, 2001 Reduced Preload
Systemic Circulation
Reduced venous return
Venous capacitance vessels
Arteriolar resistance vessels Ca
2+Blockers
-Blockers Nitrates ACEi or ARB Reduced Afterload
SA
Nitrate
-Blockers
Verapamil,diltiazem
Inotropic
Nitrates Ca
2+Blockers
Dilate
Action of Anti-Angina Drugs
Anti-anginal Effect of Beta-blockers
↓↓↓ Heart rate ↓↓ Contractility ↓ BP
↓↓ BP during exercise
↓ Oxygen wastage
↑↑ Diastolic period ↓↓ Paradoxical constriction of coronary
stenotic lesions
↓ Afterload
↓ Wall stress
↓↓↓ Myocardial oxygen demand
↑ Diastolic coronary blood flow
↑ Coronary blood
flow to ischemic area
↑ Coronary Blood flow
Mostly dependent on the slowing heart rate during exercise as well as at rest.
Modified from Bonow: Braunwald’s Heart Disease, 9
thed., 2011
Lipid Lowering Medicaitons
Atherosclerosis Revolution
4S Study
Lancet 1994;344:1383
15
10
5
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Years since randomisation
Pr op or tio n of p at ie nt s de ad
placebo
Simvastatin
risk reduction 30%
p = 0.0003
Miracle Drug !
The end of cholesterol controversy
ASCOT AFCAPS
ASCOT
AFCAPS
WOSCOPS
WOSCOPS 4S
4S
CARE
HPS
LIPID
HPS
CARE LIPID
PROVE-IT
(Atv) PROVE-IT (Pra)
IDEAL (Atv)
IDEAL (Sim)
(Atv 80 mg)TNT
TNT (Atv 10 mg)
The lower, the better
Atv = atorvastatin; Pra = pravastatin; Sim = simvastatin; PROVE-IT = Pravastatin or AtorVastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy;
IDEAL = Incremental Decrease in Endpoints through Aggressive Lipid Lowering; ASCOT = Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial;
AFCAPS = Air Force Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study; WOSCOPS = West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study
Adapted from Rosenson RS. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2004;9:269–279; LaRosa JC, et al. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1425–1435; Pedersen TR, et al. JAMA. 2005;294:2437–2445.
Mean Treatment LDL-C at Follow-up, mg/dL (mmol/L)
Ev en t, %
Statin Placebo
0 30
0 80
(2.1) 140
(3.6) 200
(5.2) 25
20 15 10 5
100 (2.6) 40
(1.0) 120
(3.1) 180
(4.7) 60
(1.6) 160
(4.1)
Secondary Prevention
Primary
Prevention
Relationship Between LDL-C and CV Incidence
Progression Regression
-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Change in Percent Atheroma
Volume*
Achieved LDL-C (mg/dL)
REVERSAL Pravastatin 40mg
REVERSAL Atorvastatin 80mg
ILLUSTRATE Atorvastatin + Placebo ASTEROID
Rosuvastatin 40mg SATURN Atorvastatin 80mg
SATURN Rosuvastatin 40mg
CAMELOT Placebo
STRADIVARIUS Placebo
A-PLUS Placebo
LDL-C & Change in PAV
Definition of high-risk / highest-risk or very high patient:
• ATP I: definite CHD or 2 other CHD risk factors1
• ATP II: existing CHD or other atherosclerotic disease2
• ATP III and the 2004 update: CHD or CHD risk equivalents3,4
• 2° AHA/ACC 2006: established coronary and other atherosclerotic disease5
• ADA 2010: overt CVD6
• ESC/EAS 2011: CVD (MI, ACS, revascularization), ischemic stroke, type 2 DM, moderate to severe CKD, or SCORE ≥10%7
As part of therapeutic lifestyle changes, including diet,
LDL-C treatment goals for high-risk patients have been lowered over time
Optional goal:
<70 mg/dL
41988 ATP I 1993
ATP II 2001
ATP III 2004
ATP III Update
Very-high-risk pts
Goal:
<130 mg/dL
1Goal:
100 mg/dL
2Goal:
<100 mg/dL
32006 AHA/ACC
Reasonable goal:
<70 mg/dL
52010 ADA
<70 mg/dL
6Goal:
<100 mg/dL
4Goal:
<100 mg/dL
5Goal:
<100 mg/dL
6Overt CVD High-risk pts
1. NCEP ATP I. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148:36–69; 2. NCEP ATP II. JAMA. 1993;269:3015–3023; 3. NCEP ATP III. JAMA. 2001;285:2486–2497; 4. Grundy SM et al. Circulation. 2004;110:227–239; 5.
Smith SC Jr et al. Circulation. 2006;113:2363–2372; 6. ADA. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(suppl 1):S11–S61. 7. Reiner Z. et al. European Heart Journal 2011;32:1769-1818
ESC/EAS 2011
<100 mg/dL
7Goal:
<70 mg/dL
7Very high risk pts
Familial dyslipidemia, severe HTN
CHD: coronary heart disease, CVD: cardiovascular disease, MI: myocardial infarction, ACS: acute coronary syndrome, CKD: chronic kidney disease, HTN: hypertension
LDL-C Goals for High-risk patients have become
More intensive over time
2013 ACC/AHA guideline – 4 statin benefit group
Age <75 y High-intensity statin (Moderate-intensity statin if not)
Age >75 y Moderate-intensity statin
High-intensity statin (Moderate-intensity statin if not)
Moderate-intensity statin
Estimated 10-y ASCVD risk ≥7.5%*
High-intensity statin
Estimate 10-y ASCVD Risk with Pooled Cohort Equations*
Moderate-intensity statin Yes
Yes
Yes
No No
No
Yes Yes
Yes
LDL–C ≥190 mg/dL
DM Type 1 or 2 Age 40-75 y
Adults age >21 y and a candidate for statin therapy
≥7.5%
Estimated 10-y ASCVD risk and age 40-75 y secondary prevention
pr im ar y pr ev en tio n
Yes
No
DM with
Clinical ASCVD
Intensity of Statin Therapy
Stone NJ, et al. published online November 12, 2013 Circulation. 2. 2014 NICE LIPID modification Clinical guideline
20 13 A CC /A H A g ui de lin e
120 14 N IC E gu id el in e
2Low Intensity Medium Intensity
High Intensity
5 10 20 40 mg 10 20 40 80 mg 10 20 40 mg 10 20 40 80 mg 20 40 80 mg
Intensity High-Intensity Moderate-Intensity Low-Intensity
Reduction %
in LDL-C > 50% reduction of LDL
with daily statin 30-50% reduction of LDL
with daily statin <30% reduction of LDL with daily statin
Statin and dose
Atorvastatin (40)-80 mg
Rosuvastatin 20 (40) mg Atorvastatin 10 (20) mg Rosuvastatin (5) 10 mg Simvastatin 20-40 mg Pravastatin 40 (80) mg Lovastatin 40 mg Fluvastatin XL 80 mg Fluvastatin 40 mg bid Pitavastatin 2-4 mg
Simvastatin 10 mg Pravastatin 10-20 mg Lovastatin 20 mg Fluvastatin 20-40 mg Pitavastatin 1 mg
분류 위험요인 혈중 지질수치 기준 해당 약제
고 저밀도지단백순수 콜레스테롤 (LDL-C)혈증
0~1 개 LDL-C 160 mg/dL 이상
HMG-CoA 환원효소억제제, 담즙산제거제,
Fibrate 계열 중 1종
2 개 이상 LDL-C 130 mg/dL 이상
관상동맥질환 또는 이에 준하는 위험인자가 있는 경우
(당뇨, 말초동맥질환, 복부대동맥류, 증상이 동반된 경동맥질환)
LDL-C 100 mg/dL 이상
급성관상동맥증후군 LDL-C 70 mg/dL 이상
고 트리글리순수 세라이드(TG)혈증
위험요인이 없는 경우 TG 500mg/dL 이상 Fibrate 계열,
Niacin 계열 중 위험요인이 있거나 1종
당뇨병이 있는 경우 TG 200mg/dL 이상
고 LDL-C 및
고 TG혈증 복합형 “순수 고 LDL-C혈증”과 “순수 고 TG혈증”에 해당되는 경우
LDL-C 및 TG에 작용하는 약제별로 각각 1종씩 인정
위험 요인
① 흡연
② 고혈압 (BP≥140/90 mmHg 또는 항고혈압제 복용)
③ 낮은 고밀도지단백콜레스테롤 (HDL-C) (<40 mg/dL)
④ 관상동맥질환 조기 발병의 가족력 (부모, 형제자매 중 남자<55세, 여자<65세에서 관상동맥질환이 발병한 경우)
⑤ 연령 (남자 ≥ 45세, 여자 ≥ 55세)
※ HDL-C≥60 mg/dL은 보호인자로 간주하여 총 위험요인 수에서 하나를 감한다.
2014년 이상지질혈증 새 보험급여기준
시행일자: 2014.1.1 / 보건복지부 고시 제2013-210