A Study on the Status of Recognition and Practical Application of Oral Hygiene Devices : with outpatient as the central figure

전체 글

(1)Journal of Dental Hygiene Science Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 95~ 103 (2002).

(2) . . †. . A Study on the Status of Recognition and Practical Application of Oral Hygiene Devices : with outpatient as the central figure †. Soo-Kyung Kim. Department of Dental Hygiene, Dongnam Health Science College, Suwon-shi, Gyeonggi-do 440-714, Korea. This study was carried out to investigate recognition level and practical application status of oral hygiene devices through making a survey of Seoul inhabitants. And survey was implemented in order to propose oral hygiene device for household health care activities. The following results were obtained by analyzing personal interviews of 347 commuting patients at two university hospitals and seven dental clinics. 1) The average length of toothbrush head was estimated as 22.3 mm and average changing cycle was 2.3 months. The user ratio of flat-headed brush was estimated as 51.9% and 46.7% were using fluoridated toothpaste. 2) Generally the ratio of toothpick users was higher than other device users. But the user ratio of dental floss was higher than toothpick in case of patients under orthodontic treatment. 3) The patients under orthodontic treatment were not familiar with handling orthodontic toothbrush. Though 45.8% among orthodontic patients recognized this type of toothbrush, only 25.4% of them knew how exactly to use it. 4) It was shown very low user ratio of oral hygiene devices that the patients who had periodontal problem, hypersensitive trouble, halitosis, implant or denture 5) The patients who had halitosis showed the highest user ratio of toothpick. The patients who had separation of teeth showed the highest user ratio of dental floss. The patients who're under orthodontic treatment showed the highest user ratio of interproximal brush and motorized brush. 6) In response to the most interesting dental disease, it's surveyed as follows; 60.3% of dental caries, 24.0% of periodontal disease, 14.8% of false occlusion and 0.9% of oral cancer. 7) Regarding the motivation of using those oral hygiene devices, 45% responded that it was because of recommendation by dental clinics. Among the negative answers, 38.6% responded that it was because of no selection guidance. 31.3% answered that they didn't use hygiene device because it's inconvenient. 12.0% answered that it's difficult to buy and expensive. 7.8% responded that they didn't feel significant improvement. 4.8% answered that dental hospitals and clinics didn't even introduce those hygiene devices. Therefore efficient campaign for those hygiene devices over all Korea nation should be developed and education program must be prepared for each case of patients in every dental hospitals and clinics.

(3) . Oral hygiene devices, Oral health education, Dental health care activity. . % ,LM N. OP& "QR ST UV* -. ,'. WXYZ [\T # ]^ _E `Va'. >?bE F/c d e f&_E g - c # `V*+ Qh! ijk lm a' . Bg@ i5nM9 o. Qhij [p& lm * # QhBqr2 Qd )_E O P sX Qtuvw g9 xy'. s5g z&# i5lm * Qtuvw {|&_E } j~ z& ,'. < Qtuvw " ~ 97 {|&@, ]_E c g! %

(4) ., )D e m &c "s51 & 31_E Qtuvw g Q@.

(5) ! " # $%&'. (Dental health)( )*+ , -. /012 3456 789 * - ": ; 7 . /! <= % ,' . > ?@ AB &# CDE F5GH I J K. 2). 1). †. Corresponding author Tel: Fax: E-mail:. .

(6) . A Study on the Status of Recognition and Practical Application of Oral Hygiene Devices : with outpatient as the central figure. Q# 3 {2! oF % ,' . c c U! _E ' &m "39 ,'. # cm U! "3 ., vFm ¡F ¢% 9 r9*. ,_@ QhBq A£/M ¤Y r9*. ,L &¥, ¦&m OP[§2 &c s51 31 $y'. ¤¨©'. 7 # ¢%9 ª%«, q ' q¬ hG QhBq%9 &+ .® ., # QhBqr U¯P° ±B²_E ³*. ,'. .©'. ´ # r` YZ sX )Ag1 [c /}µ ; ¶· $y^ d7©'. # ¸Y 99.3%9 9/ VsE . ,_@, ¹Y! }ºc " s51 31 ¡B »# _E "3*+ F¼ Q 3R )Ag ¶·2 s51 1k ½ 3 1 % ,+¾ c'. d7©'. s51 [c m M 31¿ »# _E *+ )D À^ &c s51 ²/ Á¯ % , Â ÃYÄ % , m [c ¶· Å+Æ¾ c'. d7©'. ÇÈ < É 200Ê Ë Ì2 40ÊË uQ}, 10ÊË "s51 5ÍÎ%½ ; Ï¡*. ,'. {|&m s5g! sX m Ð2 ! .ÑÊ s51 &c ²Ò2 31 $y'. 3Óa'. ( QhBqÔ, Qd )i5Ô, ¶/QÓÊ\, Q, Õ 7ÖÊ\, Q7ÖÊ\, 2^Qh, ×i5Ê\ .Ñ X Ø % ,'. Ù D ¸Y [ _E Q2 Îl <lc Q2)D! xÚ_E eÛ s51 31U! "3ÎTÜ UYÊ s51 31 Ý7. Þ PH }Y. 9/ g& m g c ¶·z& ¨/ ~ ßDÓ! }µ.D c'. 3). 4). 5). 6). 7). 8). 9). 3.. 2.

(7).

(8) (1) "3[ D F¼& À^ ¨ óôc "3[ D F¼& À^# p 12 õ'. ^å ^# öD9 35.4% ., ÊD 64.6%'. Ð T 20u ê] 11.8%, 20~29u9 38.9%, 30~39u9 25.1% 40~49u9 11.8%, 50u 12.4%E @÷ø'. 1.. . . . . !". #$%&. '(()*+). ,-. ./$. 0. . 1.. 8). 9). 20 20~29 30~39 40~49 50 . .

(9) (%). 123. 35.4. 224. 64.6. 41. 11.8. 135. 38.9. 87. 25.1. 41. 11.8. 43. 12.4. 347. 100.0.

(10) . . 2002à 9á 2F\â 9á 16Fã ¸Y< jd Ð äå ^å m 9æ~ E ²/c ¸Y< Q2[ l 2 Q2l <lc )D 347ç [ _E ©'. 2. ¸Y< 2 Q2[ l2 7 Q2l èÔ Q2s53 é"! K+, êg 0â ¨ ! 1Ê t ë ¨ "3©_¥, ìåE s51 m MÎ 31P° í Î31 U! "3ÎTÜ©'. "3 Y 31 c ¨ î# ¸ÀåY 9/ c "3 31c ¨2 cm s51 31U c "3 31c ¨ ßE %/ÎÊ 0 ^©'. ¨<1# , ±[ g[ , 31Ì2 uQ} À^, 16 "s51 [c m MÎ31 P° í ÎÇÈ 31Ê\Î31Î31G '.. . %ïa DÓ TÜ# SPSS WIN/VER 8.0 ðE>ñ 1Ê "3[ D s51 [c m MÎ31P° í MÎÇÈ 31Ê\ nMTÜ(Frequency) ©_¥, å eÛ ÇÈ 31 xm s512 ò& ^ sÊ x - r %V©'.. .

(11) (%). 116. 22.2. 59. 11.3. 52. 9.9. 18. 3.4. 28. 5.4. 120. 22.9. 75. 14.3. 55. 10.5. 523*. 100. (

(12) ). *. (2) "3[ D å À^ "3[ D å ^# p 2 õ'. 9 / m F¼ ^m# 116çm 22.2%., QE Lq ù3 úû! üý )D9 22.9%, 2^Qh)D9 14.3%, ¶/QÓ)D9 11.3%, ×)D9 10.5%, Qd )D 9 9.9%, Q(þÎý) )D9 5.4%, mµQh¡q)D9 3.4% '.. 2..

(13) . "3[ D Ì2 uQ} 31U p 32 õ'. Ôó.

(14) . Journal of Dental Hygiene Science Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 95~103 (2002). . 1234 78 C. 53 6. 9:;(mm) 245 22.3<6.3 =3>,(-?) 303 2.3<2.4 @9:AB =3(%) 180 51.9 D+EF(%) 162 46.7. ôD%! }ºc 245ç óôD9 31 Ì vÿ\ 22.3 mm ., óôD% 303ç v31 # 2.3á_¥, %ÿ\Ã 31D|# 51.9% '. >g. Ný uQ} 31D|# 46.7%E @÷ø'..

(15) ! " # $% (1) F¼ ^m s51 31U F¼ ^m s51 31U p 4 õ'. 116 ç "3[ D x s51 m D|# ¹Y9 88.8%E 97 o_¥, c ¹Y 31° í D|M 54.3%E 97 ok @÷ø'. >?@ ÇÈ 31 xm s 51# QU 31D| 19.8%E ¹Y 31D|' o_¥, ÃQ1 31D|# 37.1%E ÇÈ 31 xm s51 9æ~ 97 o'. >g. F¼ ^m ÇÈ31 xm s512 M TÜ 2, ¹Y QÌ c 9 ,'(P<0.01). 3..

(16) (n=116). G1: , %) 1234 H =3IJH KL=3 x MN103(88.8) 63(54.3) 21(18.1) 7.124** O 86(74.1) 44(37.9) 23(19.8) 1.023 PQ78 89(76.7) 38(32.8) 14(12.1) 0.017 ,78 38(32.8) 15(12.9) 6(5.2) 10.965** RS=T 19(16.4) 4(3.4) 0(0.0) 2.548 UCV> 33(28.4) 10(8.6) 3(2.6) 0.054 B3W 91(78.4) 60(51.7) 43(37.1) 2.873 (.

(17) (n=59). 1234 H =3IJH KL=3 MN49(83.1) 23(39.0) 10(16.9) O 42(71.2) 24(40.7) 14(23.7) 378 38(64.4) 15(25.4) 27(45.8) PQ78 40(67.8) 18(30.5) 10(16.9) ,78 25(42.4) 16(27.1) 13(22.0) RS=T 14(23.7) 5(8.5) 1(1.7) XG78 19(32.2) 6(10.2) 4(6.8) B3W 44(74.6) 24(40.7) 20(33.9). G1: , %). (. x2 3.701 0.018 129.865*** 1.360 4.011* 0.032 3.859* 0.255. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001. !

(18) (n=52). G1: , %) 1234 H =3IJH KL=3 x MN43(82.7) 26(50.0) 21(40.4) 5.474* O 29(55.8) 14(26.9) 10(19.2) 0.504 !" 378 9(17.3) 2(3.8) 0(0.0) 1.815 PQ78 27(51.9) 7(13.5) 6(11.5) 0.041 ,78 18(34.6) 10(19.2) 10(19.2) 1.495 RS=T 7(13.5) 1(1.9) 3(5.8) 8.069** UCV> 5(9.6) 3(5.8) 1(1.9) 0.201 B3W 29(55.8) 13(25.0) 12(23.1) 1.848 Y 3(5.8) 1(1.9) 1(1.9) 0.800 (. 2. *P<0.05, **P<0.01. 2. **P<0.01. ¶/QÓ)D s51 31U ¶/QÓxm )D s51 31U p 5 õ '. 59ç "3[ D x ¶/1 Ì . , m D| 64.4% ., 31° í . , óôD|# 25.4% _¥, ÇÈ 31D|# 45.8%E 31° í D|' o k @÷ø'. ÇÈ 31xm s51 x ¶/1 Ì 45.8%E 97 o_¥, ÃQ1 33.9%, QU 23.7%, QÌ 22.0%, ¹Y GÌ 16.9%, Ì 6.8%, Q#3Æ9 1.7% '. c ¶/QÓ)D x ÇÈ 31 xm s512 M TÜ2, ¶/Q Ó )D ¶/1Ì(P<0.001), QÌ(P<0.05), Ì (P<0.05) c 9 ,' (3) Qd )D s51 31U (2). Qd )D s51 31U p 62 õ'. 52ç "3[ D x s51 m D|# ¹Y9 82.7%E 97 o_¥, ÇÈ 31xm s51M ¹Y 9 40.4%E 97 o# ¼t 2-3 ÉM Qd )1 Ì ÇÈ 31D|# 0.0%E @÷ø'. >g. Qd )D x ÇÈ 31xm s512 M TÜ2, ¹Y Q#3Æ ò&_E c 9 ,' (P<0.05, P<0.01). (4) mµQh ¡q)D s51 31U mµQh ¡q)D s51 31U p 72 õ '. 18ç "3[ D x Q Ì m D|# 50.0% ., 31° í D|# 22.2%, ÇÈ 31D|# 12.5%E c 9 ,'(P<0.05). Ì . , óôD 38.9% ., 31° í . , óôD 5.6%, ÇÈ 31xm óôD 5.6% '. c ÇÈ 31D| x Q#3Æ, ¨}j, Q # 0.0%E ¡B »k @÷ø'. (5) Q(þÎý)7Ö )D s51 31U Q(þÎý) 7Ö )D s51 31U p 82 õ'. 28ç "3 [ D x Q1 Ì m D|# 25.0% ., Q1 Ì 31°í D|# 7.1% _ ¥, Q1 Ì ÇÈ 31D|# 10.7%E c 9 ,'(P<0.001). c Qu/} m D|# 28.6% ., Qu/} 31° í D|# 10.7% _¥, Qu/}.

(19) . A Study on the Status of Recognition and Practical Application of Oral Hygiene Devices : with outpatient as the central figure. "# $%

(20) (n=18). G1: , %) 1234 H =3IJH KL=3 x MN16(88.9) 59(27.8) 7(38.9) 1.338 O 12(66.7) 5(27.8) 4(22.2) 0.007 XG78 7(38.9) 1(5.6) 1(5.6) 0.485 PQ78 11(61.1) 3(16.7) 3(16.7) 0.320 ,78 9(50.0) 4(22.2) 6(12.5) 6.057* RS=T 3(16.7) 1(5.6) 0(0.0) 0.278 UCV> 3(16.7) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0.563 B3W 11(0.0) 4(22.2) 4(22.2) 0.702 Y 2(11.1) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0.166 (. 2. *P<0.05. (&'())*+

(21) (n=28). 1234 MNO '378 PQ78 ,78 RS=T UCV> B3W 'C. G1: , %) H =3IJH KL=3 x (. 2. 24(85.7). 15(53.6). 16(57.1) 13.928***. 18(64.3). 7(25.0). 5(17.9). 7(25.0). 2(7.1). 3(10.7) 24.438***. 0.464. 12(42.9). 3(10.7). 4(14.3). 0.010. 9(32.1). 4(14.3). 3(10.7). 0.249. 4(14.3). 1(3.6). 1(3.6). 0.973. 5(17.9). 2(7.1). 0(0.0). 0.904 2.501. 15(53.6). 7(25.0). 5(17.9). 8(28.6). 3(10.7). 3(10.7) 14.471***. ***P<0.001. ÇÈ 31D|# 10.7%E M TÜ2 9 ,' (P<0.001). (6) QE Lqù3 úû! üý )D s51 31U QE Lq ù3 úû! üý )D s5 1 31U p 9 õ'. 120ç "3[ D x ¹ Y m D|# 85.5% ., ¹Y 31°í D|# 85.8% _¥, ¹Y ÇÈ 31D|# 36.7%E c ,-./ 0%1 2 345 6)78

(22) . (n=120) (G1: , %) 1234 H =3IJH KL=3 x MN- 103(85.8) 103(85.8) 44(36.7) 8.519** O 80(66.7) 36(30.0) 31(25.8) 0.798 PQ78 76(63.3) 21(17.5) 14(11.7) 0.089 ,78 50(41.7) 21(17.5) 23(19.2) 4.378* RS=T 13(10.8) 2(1.7) 2(1.7) 0.066 UCV> 21(17.5) 4(3.3) 1(0.8) 2.750 B3W 81(67.5) 38(31.7) 36(30.0) 0.108 Z=[> 7(5.8) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1.600 2. *P<0.05, **P<0.01. 9 ,'(P<0.01). c QU m D|# 66.7% ., QU 31°í D|# 30.0% _¥, QU ÇÈ 31D| # 25.8% '. QÌ m D|# 41.7% ., Q Ì 31°í D|# 17.5% _¥, QÌ ÇÈ 31 D|# 19.2%E c 9 ,'(P<0.05). >?@ 3 ÇÈ 31D|# 0.0%E @÷ø., ò&_E c

(23) '. (7) 2^Qh )D s51 31U Y

(24) ! üý 2^Qh )D s51 31 U p 102 õ'. 75ç "3[ D x ¹Y ÇÈ 31D|# 37.3% _¥, c 9 ,'(P<0.05). c ÉMÌ m D|# 25.3% ., ÉM Ì 31 °í D|# 8.0% _¥, ÉMÌ 31D|# 2.7%E ¡B »k @÷ø'. ÃQ1 m D|# 65.3% ., Ã Q1 31°í D|# 37.3% _¥, 2 } uQ} 31D|# 8.0% _¥, ÃQ1 31D|# 18.7%E @÷ø'. 2^Qh )D ÇÈ31 xm s5 12 M TÜ2, ÃQ1 31(P<0.01)2 Q#3 Æ 31(P<0.05) c 9 ,'.

(25) 9 #

(26) (n=75) 1234 MNO \]78 H^./_`)C ,78 RS=T UCV> B3W. G1: , %) H =3IJH KL=3 x (. 2. 68(90.7). 35(46.7). 28(37.3) 5.084*. 54(72.0). 25(33.3). 17(22.7) 0.008. 19(25.3). 6(8.0). 2(2.7). 0.016. 49(65.3). 21(28.0). 6(8.0). 1.700. 28(37.3). 16(21.3). 12(16.0). 5(6.7). 12(16.0). 4(5.3). 49(65.3). 28(37.3). 11(14.7) 0.056 3(4.0). 4.412*. 0(0.0). 2.839. 14(18.7) 6.926**. *P<0.05, **P<0.01. ×)D s51 31U )D Ùm ×9 Ú'. óôc AB s51 31U p 112 õ'. m . , s51 x ¹Y m D| 81.8%E 97 o., ÇÈ 31xm s51M ¹Y9 41.8%E 97 o_¥, å ÇÈ 31xm s512 M TÜ 2, ×)D

(27) :

(28) (n=55) (8). 1234 MNO PQ78 ,78 RS=T UCV> B3W *P<0.05. G1: , %) H =3IJH KL=3 x (. 2. 45(81.8). 25(45.5). 23(41.8). 7.179*. 32(58.2). 16(29.1). 13(23.6). 0.012. 33(60.0). 8(14.5). 6(10.9). 0.132. 17(30.9). 9(16.4). 8(14.5). 0.028. 5(9.1). 1(1.8). 1(1.8). 0.066. 9(16.4). 2(3.6). 3(5.5). 1.546. 32(58.2). 15(27.3). 13(23.6). 1.709.

(29) . Journal of Dental Hygiene Science Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 95~103 (2002). ì ¹Y 31 c 9 ,'(P<0.05). ¨ }j ÇÈ 31D|# 5.5%, ÃQ1 ÇÈ 31D|# 23.6%E »k @÷ø'. 4.. & ' () * +,. 5.. & ' ( -. /0. "3[ D "s51 31k a G p 12 õ'. 200ç óôD% x ‘Q2 Ý7X’. óôc 3 45.0%E 97 o_¥, ‘D Ï_E õh’. óôc 3 30.5%, ‘.@ ! ò X’ . óôc 3 14.5%, ‘d3 ’ . óô c 3 6.0%, ‘Ï¡ Ý7X’ . óôc 3 4.0% '. "3[ D "s51 31 - p 132 õ'. 166ç óôD% 9æ~ ‘&c s51 ’ . óôc 3 38.6%E 97 o_¥, ‘31 N. h’ . óôc 3 31.3% ., ‘ ½ ;

(30) <= 53 .ab cdeb. > fGgh ij k l$b mn(op)q reb !s=t' cFh f%uab cdeb .

(31) (%) 90. 45.0. 8. 30.5. 29. 14.5. 61. 6.0. 12. 4.0. 200. 100.0. ;

(32) > 7? @8 -A. 53 vw 1234j xyb =3 Dz{n |}$b ~{> n b . k l$b .ab cd{H $b > .

(33) (%) 64. 38.6. 52. 31.3. 20. 12.0. 13. 7.8. 9. 5.4. 8. 4.8. 166. 100.0.

(34) B CD E FG

(35) H. . !". #$%&. '((?*+)d. ,-. ./ $. 0. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. $& 79(76.7). !". +. ’ . óôc 3 12.0% ., ‘{2 9

(36) õh’ . óôc 3 7.8% _¥, ‘Q 2 Ý7 -h’. óôc 3 4.8%E @÷ø'. 6.. 1 23 4 . "3[ D ±[ g[ # p 14 õ'. Qh Bqr 60.3%, Qd ) 24.0%, \/¶ 14.8%, 0.9% _E "3*_¥, å ±[ g[ m M p 15 õ'. F¼ ^mì(P<0.001) ±[ g[ _E QhBqr 76.2%E 97 o_ ¥, Q )Dì 56.1%, 2^Qh )Dì(P<0.05) 60.0%, ×)Dì(P<0.01) 59.1%E 97 o'. ¶ /QÓ)Dì(P<0.001) \/¶ 61.4%E 97 o _¥, Qd )Dì(P<0.001) Qd ) 61.5%E 97 o_¥, mµQh ¡q)Dì(P<0.01)M Qd ) 68.8%E 97 o_¥, Q7Ö )Dì(P<0.05) Qh Bqr2 Qd ) 48.0%E õh, 97 o'. å ±[ g[ m M M TÜ2, Q )D(P>0.05)! }ºc ì c 9 ,'.. . )A & g sÊ s51 31c '. dy s51_E Ì, u} ; "s51 ,' . k 'Ãc s51 R ! "k 31 sX ¶· m2 #Ê ² Ò. /$c 31P° í xy. ½ 1 Ê¾ ¥, Ô%'M m &&&m Ý7 ,+¾ '. "3[ DR e TûÊ s51 31U! "3©~ '(t, "3[ D E FG

(37) H 3). $& !" : . . : 2(1.9).

(38) (%). 196. 60.3. 78. 24.0. 48. 14.8. 3. 0.9. 325. 100.0. G1: , %). (. . x2. 103(100.0). 26.347***. 16(15.5). 6(5.8). 19(33.3). 3(5.3). 35(61.4). 0(0.0). 57(100.0). 120.872***. 16(30.8). 32(61.5). 4(8.3). 0(0.0). 52(100.0). 47.974***. 5(31.3). 11(68.8). 0(0.0). 0(0.0). 16(100.0). 19.039**. 12(48.0). 12(48.0). 1(4.0). 0(0.0). 25(100.0). 9.557*. 64(56.1). 31(27.2). 18(15.8). 1(0.9). 114(100.0). 2.111. 42(60.0). 24(34.3). 4(8.3). 0(0.0). 70(100.0). 9.711*. 28(51.9). 24(44.4). 2(3.7). 0(0.0). 54(100.0). 18.013**.

(39) A Study on the Status of Recognition and Practical Application of Oral Hygiene Devices : with outpatient as the central figure. R 31 Ì ÿ\ v [c óô# 22.3 mm E @÷@ Ý7c ‘ýà ; ^m1 Ì )*’ m 20.0~30.0 mm +d X % ,'. c Ì v 31# 2.3áE "3*+ F¼&m Ì v%ç 2-3ám _E Ø Ì¶)Y! & ²Ò. ,L % ,'. "3[ DR Ný uQ}! 31. ,' óô# 46.7% _¥ F¼ ^m NýuQ} 31Dm 71.4% ' »# _E "3*'. Ný uQ} QhBqr O P{2 15~30%. . *+ , !, k Ný uQ}! 31M« *+¾ ¥ uQ} Ný! PHM *+¾ _E 3Óa'. F¼ ^m s51 31U! t, ÇÈ 31x m s51# ÃQ1 37.1%E 97 ok @÷ø'. c ¹Y! m . , 3 88.8%E QU m . , 3' o_@, ¹Y 31D|# 18.1%E QU 31D| 19.8% ' »k "3*'. " 3 QU 31D| 2.5% "3 ¡F ¹ Y 31 3 ¡F QU 31 3' 10, ª'. "3*- 2' QU 31 3 | oh` _E *'. Q2 Îl Ý7 A B9 ªh.., ½ / m _E 3Óa'. ¶/QÓ xm )D AB, bracket ¶/7Q 7 &m \Ö_E Qtuvw f \Ö*., ßQhBq ý i5 0 % ,+ Õúc s5g9 $y' . QU 31D| ¹Y 31D|' ok @÷ø_¥, QÌ 31D|# 22.0% . ¶/QÓ)D QÌ 312 M TÜ2, c 9 ,'(P<0.05). ¶/1 Ì 31 óôD|# 45.8%E 31° í . , óôD| 25.4% ' ok "3*_¥, ¶/QÓ)D ¶/Ì 312 M TÜ2 c 9 ,' (P<0.01). ¶/1 Ì 31P° +' 1 2H , s51 31P° í 3. 31. ,L Êd+ ' /$c 31° [c ¶· $y _E 3Óa'. Qd )DR s51 31U! t, ÇÈ 31 xm s51# ¹Y9 40.4%E 97 o_¥, Ã Q1 23.1%, QU2 QÌ 19.2%E @÷ø'. Qd. )DRk Ý7* 2~3 ÉM Ì 31D 0.0% E @÷@ R [c &&&m ¶· Å+Æ¾ _E m'. mµQh ¡q)D AB mµQ 7Öa ¡q\T 2 A\ À Qtuvw@ QÜ 5 / ïx&_E gÊ¾ ~ , ! sX QÌ, Ì ; Q 31 Ý7. ,'. QÌ 31 D|# 12.5%E ò&_E c 9 ,_¥(P<0.05), Ì 31D|# 5.6%, Q 31D|# 0.0%E ¡ B »'. mµQh! ¡qc )DR# ª# QÓY2 M N. s5g9 }[E Å+ -. ,+ [c m &m ¶· YÞ Å+Æ¾ _E 3Óa'. Q(þÎý)7Ö )D s51 31U! t, 10). 9). 11). 9). 3). 3). Q1 Ì 31D| 10.7%, Qu/} 31D|# 10.7% E "3 Ê4 Q1 Ì 31D| 28.3%, Qu/} 31D|# 26.4% ' »k "3*'. Q)D s51 31 M TÜ2, Q1Ì2 Qu/} 31D|# c 9 ,'(P<0.001). QE Lqù3 úû! üý )DR s 51 31U! t, ¹Y 31D| 36.7%E 9 7 o., QU 31D|# 25.8%E ¹Y 31D| ' »_@, "3[ D åE @5+ Ø QU 31 Q )Dì 97 ok "3*'. Q Ì 31# QU 31' »# 19.2%E @÷ø_¥ c 9 ,'(P<0.05). Q \T s5g! sX ¹Y' QU@ QÌ "s51 31 *M« ¶· Å+Æ¾ _E 3Ó a'. 9 Yg'. üý 2^Qh )D s51 31U! t, ÉM Ì 31D|# 2.7% _¥, }uQ} 31D|M 8.0%E »k @÷ø'. ´ # Q23 2^ Qh! üý )Dk dE u Q}! Á¯. ,., uQ}! Á¯ uQ} ^T2 ¤R [c /! 97 ª K! ! _E "3 *- !, uQ} [c 6 & &1@ 31{2 [c /, ^TU£ [c f&m 9 $y., ! [E mR 2^Qh )DRk &c Ì2 uQ}! Ý7 % , PH *+¾ '. ×( ½ @7 ü 89 x ds3k N :2 d 89! ;c'. ?c × Ú c 34567 8ym *M ~ , Yaegaki 2 Tonzetich >g. Ã # Ê? )Ag° ×2ý{2! </ c 2, =] h> ? E ×9 Çúk 2ýa '. d7©'. >?@ )D Ùm ×9 Ú'. Ï AB, ¨}j! m óôD|# 16.4%, 31D| # 5.5% N2Ê × )DR [c ¨}j m M 31 oÊ¾ _E *'. Bg@ i5nM9 o. QhÂ U [p& lm * # QhBqr2 Qd )'. R ÿ 9 Ã[ . ¥ c T¾ Ã [ /@Ñ . ,'. # c 3 Qh! ij lm 9æ~ 75.2%9 Qh Bqr., 21.2%9 Qd ). .©_¥, ± # F `Ó%ÐD AQijlm 9æ~ 46.5%9 QhBqr., 41.1%9 Qd )'. .©'. Ù M "3[ DR ±[ g[ _E QhBq r 60.3%, Qd ) 24.0%, \/¶ 14.8%, 0.9% _E "3*'. åE TÜc 2, F¼^mì(P<0.001)2 Q)Dì, 2^Qh)Dì (P<0.05), ×)Dì(P<0.01) ÿ QhBqr 97 o k @÷ø_¥, ¶/QÓ)Dì(P<0.001) \/¶, Qd. )Dì(P<0.001)2 mµQh¡q)Dì(P<0.01) Qd. ), Q7Ö)Dì(P<0.05) QhBqr2 Qd ) o k "3*'. å ±[ g[ m M M TÜ2, Q )D(P>0.05)! }ºc ì 9). 7). 3). 12). 13). 14). 15). 16).

(40) Journal of Dental Hygiene Science Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 95~103 (2002). . c 9 ,'. "3[ D [\T Ã[ [Ê ±[ Ú B. g. ,_¥, D }1 m . ¼Ac _E 3Óa'. "s51 31k a G! "3c 2, ‘Q2 Ý7X’ . ôc 3 45.0%E 97 o'. ´ "3 ‘Q23 Ý’ "3 ‘Q2 Ó 99 Ý7X’. "3a 2 3k @÷@ 1 31# Ô%' m &&& m ¶·2 9 xyc _E *'. c "s 51 31 - ‘&c s51 ’ . óôc 3 38.6%, ‘31 N. h’ . óôc 3 31.3% ., ‘½ +. ’ . óôc 3 12.0% ., ‘{29

(41) õh’ . óôc 3 7.8% _¥, ‘Q2 Ý7 -h ’ . óôc 3 4.8%E @÷ø'.. "s51 31k a G ‘Q2 Ý7X ’. óôc 3 45.0%E 97 o_¥, " s51 31 - ‘&c s51 ’ . ôc 3 38.6%, ‘ 31 N. h’ . ôc 3 31.3% ., ‘½ + . ’ . óôc 3 12.0% ., ‘ {2 9

(42) õh’. óôc 3 7.8% _¥, ‘Q2 Ý7 -h’ . óôc 3 4.8%E @÷ø'. Ù 2, ¸Y s51 [c m M ; 31| ¡B »_¥, e [ _E " s51 {2 ; $y^ [c 9 Å+ ., Q 2Ó mR )DÀ^ eÛ &c s51 ²Ò2 31P° [c ¶· Å+Æ¾ _E *'.. ¸Y s51 [c m MÎ31P°í MÎ3 1U! . s5131 Ý7. Þ PH }Y_E 9/ g MC d.D z&_E "3*'. úD 6E ²/c ¸Y< 2 Q2[ l2 7 Q2l <lc )D 347ç [ _E të ¨ "3©_¥, åE TÊ s51 m MÎ31P°í MÎ31U! "3ÎTÜ ©- !, 'L2 õ# 2! K'. 1. "3[ D 31 Ì vÿ\ 22.3 mm ., v31# 2.3á _¥, %ÿ\Ã 31D|# 51.9% ., NýuQ} 31D|# 46.7%E "3*'. 2. "3[ D ¹Y 31D| 'Û s51 31D|' o_@ F¼^mì2 ¶/QÓ)Dì QU ; QÌ 31D| ¹Y 31D| ' ok @÷ø'. 3. ¶/QÓ)D AB ¶/1Ì 31°í D| 25.4%E 31D| 45.8% ' »k "3*+ /$c 3 1P° X

(43) 31. , _E *'. 4. Qd )D, 2^)D, mµQh¡q)D, Q7Ö)D, ×)D 31 À%1M s51 [c m M ; 31| ¡B »# _E "3*'. 5. "3[ D F¼&m s51 31|#, ¹Y 31# ×)Dì, QU 31# Q)D ì, QÌ2 GÌ 31# ¶/QÓ)Dì , ÃQ1 31# F¼^mì 97 o# _E "3*'. 6. "3[ DR ±[ g[ # QhBqr 60.3%, Qd ) 24.0%, \/¶ 14.8%, 0.9% _E "3*_¥, å ±[ g[ 2 M TÜ2, Q )D(P>0.05)! }ºc ì c 9 ,'..

(44) , , , , , , , , , : !"#. $%&, '(, p.9, 2002. 2. )*, +,-, %., -/, 01, 2, 3: 45 #. $%&, '(, pp.13-68, 2000. 3. )*, 67 , %., +,-, 89:, ;<=, >1?, 01, @A-, -/: BCDE#. $%&, '(, pp.85-159, 2000. 4. 67 : FG

(45) EHIJCDK 7F LJ MN O PQRM K PF S&. 7F #T, 17(1): 1-12, 1993. 5. >U3: PQK VW XY#Z EHIJ[ \A. FG! ]7#! 7#] A&#^_%, 1997. 6. `, a, -/: 7NU 40bcK dbef gbh LJ i0. 7F #TL, 20(4): 509-529, 1996. 7. )*, 67 , %., -j, k: lmPQno c K PF S&. 7F #TL, 16(2): 493-504, 1992. 8. p, %., 67 , )*: '(qrU g RMK PF S&. 7F #TL, 24(3): 239-257, 2000. 9. ' b: FG

(46) ^Zno &nRMK PF S&. sG7 #! E7# A&#^_%, 2001. 10. 89:, t: FG

(47) uvF wxyzK PF . 7F #TL, 22(3): 257-266, 1998.. 7). 9). . 7.. . 1.. 11. Horowitz HS, Law FE, Thompson MB, Chamberlin SR: Evaluation of a stannous fluoride dentifrice for use in dental public health programs. Basic findings J Am Dent Assoc, 72: 408-422, 1966. 12. Yaegaki K, Suetaka T: Periodontal disease and precursors of oral malodorous component. J dental health, 39: 733, 1989. 13. Tonzetich J: Reduction of malodor by oral cleaning procedure. Oral Surgery, 42: 172, 1976. 14. , , : . , 17(2): 268-278, 1993. 15. , , , : . , 22: 183-193, 1998. 16. , , , : . , 22: 296-317, 1998. (Received November 13, 2002; Accepted December 13, 2002). { %. )* |x} O ~x} K PF 7F #TL

(48) 1 %. 67 )* FG& EH d5K PF 7F #TL +]: )* %. 67 N; - EH d]

(49) 5K PF S& E7_%.

(50) A Study on the Status of Recognition and Practical Application of Oral Hygiene Devices : with outpatient as the central figure.

(51) .

(52). . . . . . . 8. . . ()*+,-(. . (.. . 5. . 67. /0. . . ! "#$%&'. 123(42. . 9:; <= > ?@$%A . <= B1CD'. J <=KL KM. . EF. 8 $;6'. N OPQRS. . . GH I. TQ> KM. . J /=? U V WX YZ[ (\ 9:]%&' . a. ^. . )%_. . KÀ. bcde:f > ?@$%A. qr st 9:u v m n o;p 9:uw st xy 9: o;p xy9: 1 s ];_ g4[. fh. ij. klm. .

(53)

(54)

(55)

(56)

(57)

(58)

(59) !"# $% &' $()*+,&' -.'/%0&1% 2 3453 6789:; %<. n. o;p. . .

(60) . z bcde:fD{;G |} > G D~ 9: ;pt 9: [ 6 "#$%&' ( j (|} j t b b v k ) 67 .

(61) Journal of Dental Hygiene Science Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 95~103 (2002) . bcde:f 9: ;Apt DZ "#$%&' . ( ). . $6 . . D . . 9:D W ). . ). . > de:f . . 67. . ¡ ~¢ £v¤¥j¦ § KB s ~DA 2(¨ ©DA (.?£D A D ;A ª$«¬ A q®()¯°±²³ +Á L(µ%³ ¶Á ()9D ·+D ¸D ¹A. D

(62) . .

(63)