• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

1.3 Subspaces in R

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "1.3 Subspaces in R"

Copied!
11
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

1.3 Subspaces in R

n

R0

{0} R1

0

R2 R3

· · ·

Example. Let V ={a(2, 1) ∈ R2|a ∈ R }

V satisfies the 10 properties of the vector space Rn Let u, v, w ∈ V, a, b, c ∈ R

Write u = a(2, 1), v = b(2, 1), w = c(2, 1),

(1) u + v = a(2, 1) + b(2, 1) = (a + b)(2, 1), (a + b ∈ R)

∈ V (3) Take 0(2, 1) ∈ V

(2)

then 0(2, 1) = 0 = (0, 0) ∈ V for u ∈ V , u + 0 = u (항등원) (4) for u = a(2, 1) ∈ V

Since −a ∈ R, −u = −a(2, 1) ∈ V So, u + (−u) = 0

(2),(5)-(10) : satisfy!

Definition 1.3.1.

Let W ∈ Rn

W : subspace of Rn, (W < Rn) if

W satisfies the 10-properties of Rn with the same operation +, ·

(W, Rn에서 사용하는 +, · 은 같은 것이다)

(3)

Theorem 1.3.2.

Let W ⊂ Rn

Then W : subspace of Rn

⇔ (i) W 6= φ,

(ii) au + bv ∈ W for u, v ∈ W, a, b ∈ R.

(10-properties를 검사하는 것을 대신한다)

idea of proof. (⇒) By proposition 3, there is 0 ∈ W

∴ W 6= φ

Let u, v ∈ W, a, b ∈ R,

then au ∈ W, bv ∈ W by proposition 6 (∵ the same operation 이기에) and au + bv ∈ W by proposition 1

(4)

Hence W < Rn

(⇐) (1) Take a = 1, b = 1 then

au + bv ∈ W by assumption

⇒ u + v ∈ W (2) u + (v + w) (in W )

= u + (v + w) (in Rn) 마찬가지로 Rn에도 속하고

= (u + v) + w by proposition 2

= (u + v) + w (in W ) 같은 operation을 사용하기에 Proposition 2에 의해서 바꾼 벡터합 역시 W 에 속한다 (3) 0이 W 에 속함을 보여야 한다.

Since W 6= φ, pick u ∈ W

then take a = 1, b = −1, v = u (임의의 a, b를 적절하게 잡아서 증명) u + (−1)u ∈ W by assumption

(5)

⇒ 0 ∈ W (au + bv ∈ W !) (4) Let u ∈ W

then take a = −1, b = 0, then −u ∈ W (5) ∼ (10) : hold!

Example

(1) W0 = {0} ∈ Rn 0 = (0, · · · , 0)

(1) 0 ∈ W0 ⇒ W0 6= φ

(2) for u, v ∈ W0, a, b ∈ R then u = 0, v = 0

⇒ au + bv = a · 0 + b · 0 = 0 ∈ W0 by (1), (2), W0 < Rn

(6)

(2) W ={(a, −a, b) ∈ R3|a, b ∈ R}

(1) Take a = b = 0

(0, 0, 0) ∈ W by definition of W

∴ W 6= φ

(2) Let u = (a, −a, b) ∈ W, v = (c, −c, d) ∈ W, (a, b, c, d ∈ R) for α, β ∈ R,

αu + βv = α(a, −a, b) + β(c, −c, d)

= (αa + βc, −(αa + βc), αb + βd)

∈ W ∵ (αa + βc, αb + βd ∈ R)

∴ W < R3

(3) Let A = {u1, · · · , uk} ⊂ Rn

V ={v ∈ Rn | v : linear combination of A}

(7)

={v ∈ Rn | v = a1u1 + · · · + akuk, ai ∈ R}

then V < Rn sub vector space → subspace

idea of proof. (1) Take a1 = 1, a2 = 2, a3 = 3, · · · , ak = k ∈ R(아무거나) u1 + 2u2 + · · · + kuk ∈ V by definition of V

∴ V 6= φ (2) α, β ∈ R,

v = a1u1 + · · · + akuk, w = b1u1 + · · · + bkuk, u, w ∈ V αv + βw = (αa1 + βb1)u1 + · · · + (αak + βbk)uk

∈ V by definition of V

∴ V < Rn

(4)X ={(a, b) ∈ R2|0 ≤ a, b ≤ 1}, V < Rn

(8)

X: not subspace

(1, 1) + (1, 1) = (2, 2) /∈ X

Theorem 1.3.3.

W1, W2 < Rn ⇒ W1 T W2 < Rn

idea of proof. (i) W1, W2 < Rn

(9)

⇒ W1 6= φ, W2 6= φ

⇒ 0 ∈ W1, 0 ∈ W2

⇒ 0 ∈ W1 T W2

⇒ W1 T W2 6= φ (ii) Let u, v ∈ W1 T W2

Let a, b ∈ R

Show au + bv ∈ W1 T W2 u, v ∈ W1 T W2

⇒ u, v ∈ W1 and u, v ∈ W2

⇒ au + bv ∈ W1 and au + bv ∈ W2

⇒ au + bv ∈ W1 T W2 by (i), (ii) using theorem,

W1 T W2 < Rn

(10)

• W1 S W2 : not subspace

Let W1, W2 : 1-dim subspaces in R2

W2 W1

직선이 평면상에서 원점을 지나야한다.

W1 + W2하면 평면을 만들어낼 수 있다

Let W1 ={(a, a)|a ∈ R}, W2 ={(b, 0)|b ∈ R}, (1, 1) ∈ W1, (1, 0) ∈ W2 (1, 1) + (1, 0) = (2, 1) /∈ W1 S W2

(11)

Theorem 1.3.4.

W1, W2 < Rn ⇒ W1 + W2 < Rn

W1 + W2 :={u1 + u2|u1 ∈ W1, u2 ∈ W2}

idea of proof. (i) Since 0 ∈ W1, 0 ∈ W2, so 0 ∈ W1 + W2

∴ W1 + W2 6= φ

(ii) Let u, v ∈ W1 + W2 a, b ∈ R for u ∈ W1 + W2

write u = u1 + u2, u1 ∈ W1, u2 ∈ W2 by 합의 정의 v = v1 + v2, v1 ∈ W1, v2 ∈ W2

Then au + bv = (au1 + bv1) + (au2 + bv2) ∈ W1 + W2 Hence W1 + W2 < Rn

참조

관련 문서

이때 R&amp;D 포트폴리오 관리는 반드시 해당 기업의 사업/기술 전략상의 방향과 R&amp;D 포트폴리오를 도입하려는 목적 포트폴리오 가치 극대화, 프로젝트간의 균형 달성, 포트

Algebraic spectral subspaces are useful in automatic continuity theory of intertwining linear operators on Banach spaces.. In this paper, we characterize algebraic spectral

공식을 이용한

공식을 이용한 추정... 베타회귀계수외

[r]

backward shift invariant subspace, invariant subspace, Hardy space, cross commutator.. The first author is partially supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research

Since R 2 is the only 2-dimensional simply connected solvable Lie group, we need to check only 3-dimensional Lie groups.. Suppose G is a 3-dimensional simply connected solvable

함수에 대한 상세 설명.. R