• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Azumaya algebras of a complex analytic space

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Azumaya algebras of a complex analytic space"

Copied!
6
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

J.

Korean Math. Soc.

Vol.18,No.1 1981

AZUMAYA ALGEBRAS OF A COMPLEX ANALYTIC SPACE By

HEISOOK LEE

We first recall the definition of an Azumaya algebra over a ringed space (X, Ox). We write 0 for the structure sheaf Ox, when there is no confu- sion. Undefined terms and the basic properties of Azumaya (central simple) algebras over a commutative ring can be found in [2J among many other sources. Let (X, 0) be a ringed space and L be a sheaf of O-algebras. Then L is an Azumaya algebra over (X, 0) if L is finitely presented as an O-mo- dule and Lx is an Azumaya Ox-algebra for every xEX. (For the basic pro- perties of sheaves of O-modules and O-algebras, see Chapter Il. [5J)

To define the Brauer group of a ringed space, we state the following three facts:

1. ([1], Theorem Ill. 4) If 111 is a faithful locally profective sheaf of modules of finite type over a ringed space (X, 0), then deomo (M, 111) is an Azumaya algebra over (X, 0).

2. (DJ, Theorem Ill. 5). If A and Bare Azumaya algebras over a ringed space (X, 0), then so is A®B.

3. (DJ, Theorem Ill. 6). If A is an Azumaya algebra over a ringed space (X, 0) and F is a sheaf of commutative O-algebras, then A ® F is an Azu- maya algebra over the ringed space (X, F).

DEFINITION.

([6J, 1. 1. 6). Let A and B be two Azumaya algebras over a locally ringed space (X, 0). We say A and B are equivalent and write

A~

B if there exist two faithful locally projective O-modules P and Q of finite type such that

A®8Com(P, P) ;;::; B®deom(Q, Q).

Then

~

is an equivalence relation.

Let Br

(X)

denote the set of equivalence classes of Azumaya algebras over (X, 0). Write [AJ for the equivalence class of A in Br(X) and define a product in Br (X) by [AJ[BJ

=

[A®BJ: this is well defined by Theorem n. 5 ([lJ) and (2). It can be easily verified that Br

(X)

is an abelian group with

Received April 28, 1981.

(2)

50 Heisook Lee

[OJ=l and [AJ-I=[AoJ because of (1).

Let (X, Ox) and (Y,Oy) be ringed spaces. The ringed space (Z,Oz) ca- lled disjoint union and denoted X lL Y, is defined as follows:

As a topological space Z is the disjoint union of X and Y, V is open set in Z if and only if

i - I

(V) and r

I

(V) are open in X and Y respectively, where i : X

-+

Z and

j:

Y

-+

Z ane canonical inclusions. The structure sheaf Oz is defined as follows; for any open set

V~Z,

Oz(V):= {(ShS2) IsIEOxCi-I(V», S2EOy(j-I(V»}.

We often write X for a ringed space (X, 0).

PROPOSITION

1. Let

X

and Y be ringed spaces. Then Br

(XlLY)~Br(X)E8Br(Y).

Proof. The mp-ps

A I - (i* (A) , j*(A»

B Jt. C

~I

(B, C), where B lL C is the sheaf obtained by glueing sheaves B and C,

give the equivalence between the category of sheaves of Oz-algebras and the category of sheaves of Ox E8 Oy-algebras. From the definition of disjoint un- ion of ringed spaces, and of Azumaya algebra, A is an Azumaya Oz-algebra if and only if i* (A) and j* (B) are Azumaya algebras over X and Y respec- tively. Hence the conclusion follows.

Now we consider the following special kind of ringed space, namely com- plex analytic space ([4J). Let C be the field of complex numbers.

DEFINITION.

([IOJ, p. 344). A ringed space (X, H) consisting of a topological space X and a sheaf H of algebras over C is called a complex analytic space if it satisfies the following condition; every xEX has a neighborhood U su- ch that (U, 0

)(,IU)

is isomorphic, as a ringed space, to (W, 0 a"), where W is an open set in en (for the usual topology) and 0

an

is the sheaf of analytic functions on W.

For every xEX, H

x

is the local ring of germs of homomorphic functions at x, and (X, H) is a locally ringed space.

Let (X,O) be a scheme of finite type over C and let (X

h ,

H) be the asso- ciated complex analytic space (see [5J, appendix B or [9J), i. e., X

h

is the set of closed points of X whose topology is defined by taking the sets V(U:

f1> "', fn:e) as a basis of open sets, where V(U:fI' ···,fn:e) is defined as follows: fOF every open set U in X and finitely many regular functions f1>

""In on U, and a number e>O,

V(U:f1> "',fn:e) = {XEX

h

U Ullfi(X) I <e, i=l, 2, "', n}.

Then there is a continuous map

(3)

qy:Xh~X

of underlying topological spaces which maps X

h

bijectively onto the set of closed points of X, and a natural morphism of structure sheaves

O~qy*(H)

on X. In other words,

~:

(X

h ,H)~(X,

0) is a morphism of locally ringed spaces.

Fix the morphism f{! and consider the group homomorphism Br (X)

~Br

(Xh)

induced by the contravariant functor Br (-) from the category of locally n- nged spaces to the category of abelian groups.

We show that the map Br (X)

->

Br (X

h )

is an isomorphism if X is a smooth projective variety. From now on we assume that X is a smooth proJec- tive variety.

THEOREM

2. Let A and B be Azumaya algebras over a smooth projective variety (X, 0) such that qy* (A) and f{!* (B) are isomorphic. Then A and B are isomorphic as O-algebras.

Proof. Let f: qy* (A)

~f{!*

(B) be a given isomorphism of H-algebras.

Then there is a unique O-module isomorphism g: A---> B such that

9*

(g) = f, by Theorem 2 ( § 12 [9J). To show that g is in fact morphism of O-algebras, we consider the following commutative diagram of sheaves on X

h

9-

1

(g)

~-l

(A)

_~rp-l

(B)

i

1 f li

qy* (A)

- ~

so* (B)

where i and

j

are canonical qy-l (O)-algebra homomorphism. Since Ox

->

H x is injective for every xEX

h ,

f{!-1(0)

->

H is injective. Since rp-leA) and f{!-l (B) are finitely generated locally free qy-l (0) -module, i and

j

are mJec- tive. For every xEX

h,

the above diagram induces the following commuta- tive diagram

gx

Ax----~bx

ixl fx Ijx

Ax®o"H:r~A/g;oxHx .

Since i x and jx are injective and fx is isomorphism as Ox-algebras, gx is also

Ox-algebra homomorphism. Hence the isomorphism

g

of sheaves of O-mo-

(4)

52

dules has to be O-algebra morphism, since g is morphism of sheaves and

gx

is Ox-algebra morphism for every closed point in X.

From the above theorem, the following corollary follows.

CoROLLARY

3. Br (X) -Br (X

h)

is one-ta-one.

To prove the equivalence from the set of Azumaya O-algebras to the set of Azuinaya H-algebras, we consider the following functor F (functor F

2

in

§ 2[11J).

Let P be a finitely generated locally free O-module. Then define F: (locally ringed spaces over a scheme X)

~

(Sets) by

(*) F((Y, Oy»: = set of all multiplication laws m defined on f*(P) such that (f* (p), m) is an Azumaya algebra over (Y, Oy), where f: (Y, Oy) - (X, Ox) is the structure morphism. Then F is a functor and a sheaf.

PROPOSITION

4. Let functor

G: (locally ringed spaces over a scheme X) - - (Sets)

be a sheaf. Suppose there exists an open cover {Vi} iEI of X such that the in- duced functor G; is representable for all iEI. Then G is representable.

Proof. Let G; be represented by Y;o Then since G is a sheaf, Y

i

can be glued together and hence G is represented by (Y,Oy) obtained from Y;'s

([5J 3.5, Chapter 2).

From § 2 in [l1J and from the above proposition, the functor F defined by (*) is representable by a locally ringed space (Y, U) over X. Let f:

(Y, U)-(X,O) be the structure map and O-f*(U) be the morphism of structure sheaves on X. Then f*(U)x is a smooth Ox-algebra, since U is locally smooth over 0 by construction ([l1J, § 2) and since smoothness is preserved under localization ([7J, 28.5).

THEOREM

5. Let A be an Azumaya H-algebra. Then there exists an Azu- maya a-algebra B such that q;* (B)

~

A.

Proof. By theorem 3 ([9J, § 12) , there is a locally free O-module P of finite type such that q;* (P)

~A

as H-modules. Then from the above conSI- deration and from the functor F defined by (*),

F(O) : =aOIDo-alg (U, 0) F(H) : =!JeomO-alg(U, q;* (H»

for some locally smooth sheaf U of O-algebras. Now' the theorem follows

from the following proposition.

(5)

PROPOSITION

6. Let U be a locally smooth O-algebra. Then the map deomo-al

g

(U, 0)

- ?

deomo-al

g

(U,

<p*

(H»

is surjective.

Proof. By the adjoint property, the map

!JeomH-alg(<p*

(U), H)

- ?

!JeomO-al

g

(U,

<p*

(H»

is bijective. Again theorem 2 ([9J, § 12) says the map deomo- mod (U, 0) ----deOmH-mod

(<p*

(V), H)

is bijective. Let g:

<p*

(U)

->

H be an H-algebra homomorphism. Then consider the following commutative diagram as in the proof of theorem 2.

9-

1

(V) k

({!-1

(0)

I i

i 1

g

V

9*(V) - - - - H

k is the a-module homomorphism determined by g. Since U is locally sm- ooth, U

x

is flat Ox-module for every

xEXh

and hence i

x

and

Jx

are

injective in the following induced commutative diagram.

k

x

V

x - - - -

ix

1

gx

V

x

0Hz: - - - -

As in the proof of theorem 2, k is a-algebra homomorphism and now the proposition follows.

From corollary 3 and theorem 5, we obtain the following.

COROLLARY

7. If

X

is a projective variety and X

h

is the associated analytic space, then the Brauer groups Br (X) and Br (X

h )

are isomorphic.

References

1.

Auslander, B., The Brauer group of a ringed space, J. Algebra, 4 (1966), 220- 273

2. Auslander, M. and Goldman, 0., The Brauer group of a commutative ring,' Tr- ans. Amer. Math. Soc. 97 (1960), 367-409

3. Grothendieck, A., Le groupe de Brauer I, n, Ill, in dix exposes sur la cohomo-

logie des schemas,

~orth-Hol1and,

1968

(6)

54

4. Gunning, RC. and Rossi, H., Analytic Functions of Several Complex Variables, Prentice-Hall (1965)

5. Hartshorne, R, Algebraic Geometry GTM (52), Springer-Verlag, 1977

6. Lee, H., Brauer Group of an Integral Scheme, Ph. D. thesis Queen's University, 1978

7. Matsumura, H., Commutative Algebra, W. A. Benjamin Inc. New York, 1970 8. Orzech, M. and Small, C., Brauer group of commutative rings, Marcel Dekker,

New York, 1975

9. Serre, ]. P., Geometrie algebrique et Geometrie analytique, Ann. Inst. Fourier 6 (1956), 1-42

10. Shafarevich, 1. R., Basic Algebraic Geometry, Grundlehren 213, Springer-VerIag, Heidelberg, 1974

11. Strano, R Azumaya Algebras over Hensel Rin, gs Pacific ]. of Math. VoI. 61, No. 1 (1975), 295-303

Ewha Womans University

참조

관련 문서

Two matrices A=[a jk ] and B=[b jk ] are equal, written A=B, if and only if they have the same size and the corresponding entries are equal, that is, a 11 =b 11 , a 12 =b 12 ,

• Not a determinate, logical process but an irrational search over a ground prepared by a knowledge of principles, of prototypes and the characteristics of site and

It considers the energy use of the different components that are involved in the distribution and viewing of video content: data centres and content delivery networks

Basic aspects of AUTOSAR architecture and methodology Safety mechanisms supported by AUTOSAR.. Technical safety concepts supported by AUTOSAR Relationship to ISO

GDP impact of COVID-19 spread, public health response, and economic policies. Virus spread and public

After first field tests, we expect electric passenger drones or eVTOL aircraft (short for electric vertical take-off and landing) to start providing commercial mobility

1 John Owen, Justification by Faith Alone, in The Works of John Owen, ed. John Bolt, trans. Scott Clark, &#34;Do This and Live: Christ's Active Obedience as the

 Modified version of PVW : “a particle is in static equilibrium if and only if the virtual work done by the externally applied forces vanishes for all