A Study on the Determining Factors of Work Stress Coping Strategies of Dental Hygienists
전체 글
(2) . †. A Study on the Determining Factors of Work Stress Coping Strategies of Dental Hygienists †. Young Suk Yoon. Department of Dental Hygiene, Dongju College, Pusan 604-715, Korea. By extracting the variables related to the work stress generated from dental hygiene, identifying their relationships, this study aims to contribute to academic progress on work stress. The test results of this study are as follows for each hypothesis: 1. Among the work stress sensing factors, role ambiguity showed correlation to the active coping strategy and the passive coping strategy, whereas it did not have any correlation to the evasive reation. However, the physical resource environmental factor showed correlation to the active coping strategy, whereas it did not have any correlation to the other reation. 2. The passive coping strategy, among the work stress coping strategies, influences the role ambiguity, B type, work ambiguity, physical resource environmental factor by about 18.7%. 3. The active coping strategy, among the work stress coping strategies, influences the social support, role ambiguity, work place of health center factor by about 18.9%. 4. The evasive reaction, among the work stress coping strategies, was influenced by only the 36 years old over factor by approximately 4.2%. 5. It was found in all work stress sensing factors that the group with lower social support had a more degree of experiencing stress than the group with higher social support. In case of the behavior pattern, the type A experienced more stress than the type B only in role ambiguity. 6. It was found that the group with the higher social support tended to choose more active coping strategy than the lower social support. In case of behavior pattern, the type B coped more actively than type A in the passive coping strategy.
(3) . Determining factors of work stress, Active, Passive, Evasive coping strategies. . <R : vw,r |, {m m% }~, <#: B> z< [\ 0^ ;3 u: v{L, fr Y < z K<"7 >m,O W \ L . % [\ K<"7B> + ^fm, w + < &'` + m : 2 K 4O {m w + ! 2 q. + K<"7^fm ;> & {m : w !2 3 K<"7^fm 3% ;, 5 O : w z2 l #¡: ¢£2 : . de K<"7 ^fm K<¤ f ;> C + 4, R¥4 ¦§ `: 2 ¨ © ª «¬, 3Q :§ «3D (% &®2 2 ¯°, f8, B>I± ¯U2 l²³ K<{m& ´ªe µM ¶I z ·<4 K<{m & ±¤ 3 u =. ¸ M +E "7^fm, ;>% &' = ¹º a3 M (O 7,.
(4) . Brenner(1978) ! " # $ 50-70% % &' () *+ , -. /012 34 . 5 * /)" 6 7 $ 75% 8 9 :. ;)< &'= ;> ?@ AB C + 6 D "7B>E FG H I J. K<"7 L M NO P3 B>3Q< R, <#: B>S< E T)< ( U2 8VWX B> Y* Z[\ 2 ]^ Y _`X 3a bc: B>E . de fOgh !i< jkl, mno pW= 3Mq rs, fpR <R tW 3 u Gl, vwr Lx< yz, {mKw. 2). 1). 3). †. Corresponding author Tel: 051-200-3483 Fax: 051-201-5420 E-mail: [email protected]. .
(5) . A Study on the Determining Factors of Work Stress Coping Strategies of Dental Hygienists. »8, 5 : ¼½¾2 ¿em À ( Á. 5ÂM K<¤ f,2 O : ¹º% ;> Ã²Ä I ÅÆ< ;> Ç ¼£ À3 : ¼ÈÉ &: ^Ê4 ¹º «; \ Ë: . + ·n4 "7Ì; ¯°12 K<¤ f, ;> Ã²Ä I ¦ §4 ^Ê4 ¼ÈÉ ÍÎ2 Ï` K<"7Ì; · n4 &% K<¤ f, Ð 8Ñmw m Ò ¹º ²E Ó. Ò ¹º + ÔR: ¹ºÔ\ Õ< [. . K<¤ f, ;> 30¡< ;> ¼ÈÉ ¡r ϧ4O : &&§ 2 À. K<¤ f, ;> 30¡, ÅÆI 5 ºÏ§Ö4 ÆI\ ;> ¼ÈÉ¡ ϧ 4O : 2 × À. ;> 30¡< ºÏ§Ö4 ÆI\ ;> ¼ÈÉ ¡ # 4 ¼ ϧ4O : 2 × À. ;> 30¡< ºÏ§Ö4 ÆI\ ;> ¼ÈÉ ¡ # 44 ¼ ϧ4O : 2 × À. ;> 30¡< ºÏ§Ö4 ÆI\ ;> ¼ÈÉ ¡# ØÙYÚ Ï§4O : 2 × À. K<¤ f, ;> 30¡< ;> ¼ÈÉ ¡\ ÅÆI + ϧ4O : ÛÜ Ý À. fØ37 RE ;> 30¡ Ý À. 1Þß ;> 30¡ Ý À. fØ37 RE ;> ¼ÈÉ¡ Ý À. 1Þß ;> ¼ÈÉ¡ Ý À. . . . Ò ¹º + ?àb áâ¤1 ãä â¤ÔR åæç < ²r $ gèéLê ë K<"é7, , 8ì "7 > K<¤. f 227í2 O ¶² Ó. 2. . Ò ¹º mwIà\ 2002î 6ï 2gh 7ï 7r ðñ ¶²òD mwIà ¶4 $2 ó W m8 Ú ôQ Ôä3¾2 Ó. Ôä3 õö% IàÝ Ì f K<"é7 z2 ¹ºm ;} ½ä W K<"7 &§m E÷2 « õö ÓD, õg= 300g !äm # 263g ØI9, 5 # >Úô 8O 8ø= 36 1.. g G: ù 227g ¹ºmwO f9..
(6) ;> 30¡ Ò ¹º + úûÆO ÔR: ;> 30¡\ ;>{L< Å A : T)2 30çOü 6. ÀO, ý±¹º + þe f= ÿREº Wolfgang (1988) A W : ÿREº HPSI(Health Professional Stress Inventory) 8ÑO Ì ¡ÍÎ2 ¶² : Õ = 43 ¡ ¢£?1(1,2,4,5,9,15,28,29,31), 4 m7{L(8,12,14,22,25,27,30,32), ;>mn1(7,11,16,21, 23,26), &§(17,19,20,24,33) &'= ù 28ä2 Ò ¹º f Ó. 5 0 ä\ 1( 5) + 5( 53 )3 5b§O ºÍ Likert Q 5 EO I gW Ó. Ò ¹º + &12
(7) 8 ¤: Cronbach's §I .8639O Mì. (2) ÅÆI , ±vß\ “ C + ²r W 30 RE Ý Mì 1Þd1 : Gß4 ± v”O A/B ±vß2 Í 8 ¤` f: Eº Framingham(1978) E IQ :¶R W f: <±vßÍ Ôä3> f Ó. Ò ¹º Cronbach's §I .6110O Mì. , fØ37 Æ\ “Å vwM g , f% Q 4, Q4 }~2 Ï W ¤OM U, , R fpR ç RE”O R House ÿRä2 Ì W f: ÿREº(3,6,10,13,18) f Ó. Ò ¹º Cronbach's §I .6546O Mì. (3) ;> ¼ÈÉ¡ Å ;> 3092 ã Â: ;> ` F½ 8 ¤`+ f 3 ½2 ¼ÈÉ :. Â: ¼ÈÉ\ 44 ¼ÈÉ (6,9,12,13,15,16), 4 ¼ÈÉ(1,2,3,4,7,10) 5 ØÙY Ú(5,8,11,14)O º!£ I D, ¼ÈÉ " ß2 Å f ;> 30< ¼ÈÉ\ Mì I . 44 ¼ÈÉ\ m«8¯ # A W ?@ ä m8 O `p ó G 4 {L2 ¯v4O ¼çOü 1$% úû2 º ó L2 Mì, 4 ¼ÈÉ\ G4{L2 Ʋ%8 m¥2 Ʋ%ó U D G4Ì< C cÚ & ì µM ê E÷2 « m8 2 `p ó D 1$v8% m1 6'8 ó( L Õ2 Mì D, ØÙYÚ ¼ÈÉ\ ä`p2 ¤: 44 ²EM U2 8 ¹ )8ó C2 *+ W ä O 3 u£ © «¬ m¥ È< m,/2 3 8 ¤ W ¯ Eº4 ±v µg & ØÙ% [\ ½4 8 f L Õ2 Mì-. Ò ¹º + Davidson & Cooper % Latack Ôää< Lazarus% Folkman Ôä3 Ì ëº1 W ù 16äO º1: ÌfEº f Ó. 5 ¹ºÍÎ2 ¤ W 0 ä\ ;> 30 ` " ;> ¼ÈÉ2 fò3 1( 5 3.. (1). 4). 5). 6). 7). 9). 8).
(8) . Journal of Dental Hygiene Science Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 75~83 (2002). 3 ) + 5( 5)3 5b§O ºÍ Likert Q EO I gW ÓD, Ò ¹º Cronbach's §I .6327O Mì.. 5. 4.. . ÔäÌf p<O 3 Úômw &12
(9) 8 ¤ W Cronbach's §I : ¥.E /Ð2 Ó.
(10) ¹º?ß ÔR= ÆI,r &§ 0í 8 ¤ W &ÍÎ2 ¶² Ó.. ^
(11) ÆI% 2 K W úûÆI,r< &§ 0í 8 ¤` Ø1ÍÎ2 ¶² Ó. 824 ϧÍν¾O 3Ò d12 ÍÎ 4EÍÎ< ÛÜ Ý /Ð 8 ¤: t-/Ð2 W mw 04 d12 0í Ó. 1.. .
(12). ϧ4 p< ¹º ºÏ§Ö4 d1< ÿRÆI 8Ò4 ϧK ² m :. , Ò ¹º ¹º K<¤ f, ºÏ§Ö4
(13) 1\ <3 1>< [.
(14)
(15) .
(16)
(17) 0~5 6~10 11~15 16~20 20~25 ! 26~30 31~35 36 "#. . . 63 164. 27.8 72.2. 27.8 100.0. 158 38 26 5. 69.6 16.7 11.5 2.2. 69.6 86.3 97.8 100.0. 84 113 22 8. 37.0 49.8 9.7 3.5. 37 86.8 96.5 100.0. 117 63 21 26. 51.5 27.8 9.3 11.4. 51.5 79.3 88.5 100.0. 56, p7 é> ÿ* + Ìf m, # 7 K< ¤ f,\ 164í(72.2%), 87 K<¤ f,\ 63í(27.8%) O Íö9. LUÿ* + 5î >: K<¤ f , Ìf m, # 158í(69.0%) Íö Ó 16î >: K<¤ f,\ 5í(2.2%) <: ÀO Mì . >8&ÿ* + Ȧ Ìf m, # K<"7 > K<¤ f, 113í(49.8%)O ) Íö ÓD 5 ÕO K<7 84í(37%), 22í(9.7%), Ö"7 8í(3.5%) c+O Íö ÀO Mì. ¹8ÿ* + Ȧ Ìf m, # 209 +gh 309 f Íö: f, 180í(79.3%)O ) Úô Ó D 309 K<¤ f Úô: Íö 47í(20.7%). . $ % & '()* + 0.17 0.55 2.26 -./0 0.14 0.63 12 34 3.00 -0.37 0.46 2.38 53 0.02 0.58 2.41 67 -0.11 0.45 2.59 89 : 0.03 0.57 3.78 ;<= -0.19 0.55 3.23. >? 0.12 0.38 3.34 >? 0.54 0.67 2.45 <@AB. , 0.22 0.02 0.19 -0.18 0.44 -0.51 0.15 -0.14 0.16. < Ó. , ÿRÆI, W Ȧmw : FÛ O+ ÆI! ÛÜ< 3:Ý 5 *E(skewness)% ;E (kurtosis) º W <3 2>% [ R Ó. 3 2 <* K<¤ f,\ ;> 30¡ # + 4 m7{L(3.00) ) \ -. ÀO MìD Õ &§(2.41), ;>mn1(2.38) 9 ) 4\ ÀO =b= ¡\ ¢£ ?1(2.26)9. 5 K<¤ f, ±vß Ìf + 5 ª ÛÜ 2.59O MìM A ß2 f , $r À2 I 9. &: K<¤ f, 3 fØ4 37 RE >4 ?\ ÀO Mì (3.78). 5 30 : ÅÅ ¼ÈÉ # + 4 ¼(3.34), 44 ¼(3.23) 5 ØÙYÚ (2.45) c+O Mì. « K<¤ f,\ B> : yz2 Ñ@ L 44O ä `p ó 8 4 m9 $ ÀO A I .. (1) ¹ºÔ 1 ;> 30¡< ;> ¼ÈÉ¡r ϧ4O : &&§ 2 À. ;> 30¡< ;> ¼ÈÉ¡r &&§ «8 ¤ W mw ÍÎ: p< <3 3>< [. ;> 30¡O &§, ¢£?1, ;>mn 1, 4 m7{L zD ;> ¼ÈÉ ¡O 4 ¼, 44 ¼, ØÙYÚ z. 3 3 + % [ ¢£?1 ¡\ ¼½¾ + 4 ¼% 44 ¼ + &§I r B\ 00 -.372% -.326O g4 &2 W( M ØÙYÚ L : & &§ 6|3 C. 5 4 m7{L< ¼½¾# 44 ¼ + r= -.214O g4 &2 W (9M D ¼½¾,\ : &&§ 6|3 C. ;>mn1 LE 4 ¼ r=-.275O, 44 ¼ + r=-.255O ¢² g4 &2 W ( M ØÙ YÚ L : &&§ 6|3 C. &§ LE 4 ¼ r=-.215O, 44 ¼ + r=-.275O ¢² g4 &2 W( D ØÙYÚ L : &&§ J ÀO Mì.. 2..
(18) . A Study on the Determining Factors of Work Stress Coping Strategies of Dental Hygienists.
(19) !"#
(20) $$. -./0 12 34 53 67 > ?. > ? <@AB. -. /0 12 34 5 3 6 7 > ? > ? <@ AB ? CD 1.00 .193***. 1.00. .440***. .280***. 1.00. .582***. .478***. .511***. 1.00. -.372***. .021. -.275***. -.215**. 1.00. -.326***. -.214*. -.255***. -.275***. .320***. 1.00. -.075. -.079. -.100. .031. .259*. .361*. 1.00. * : p<.05 ** : p<.01 *** : p<.001. p<O a « &§ ; 3 u µM ¢£ ?: L, 4 m7{L gE: L 5 ;> mn43 uçOü : ¼ ØÙYÚ< & J ÀO Mì. 5 6 ¡< : ¼ Qr : &2 8 3ª 5 RE «( F\ &&§ ÕO úûÆI ^
(21) ÆI K RE «8 ¤` Ò ¹º + Ø1ÍÎ2 Ó. (2) ¹ºÔ 2 ;> 30 ¡< ºÏ§Ö4 ÆI ;> ¼ ÈÉ ¡ ϧ4O : 2 × À. ¤ +% [\ ¹ºÔ 2 /Ð 8 ¤`+ Ò ¹º + f: ½¾\ ;> 30¡< ºÏ§Ö4 ÆI, ;> ¼ Ç 2 K3 º¦ 4O ÍÎ 8 ¤: #Ø1ÍÎ b§!(stepwise) ½Q2 f Ó. % [\ ÍÎ2 ¤ W ^
(22) ÆI ;> ¼ÈÉ ¡ 2 K úûÆIO+ ;> 30¡, &§, ¢£?1, ;>mn1, 4 m7{L< º ϧÖ4 ¡ 1!, ¹8, p7>, LU z ÆI f Ó. úûÆI ^
(23) ÆI K 2 «8 ¤ ` ÆI(dummy variables)O È{ W çG Ø1ÍÎ2 ¶² Ó. ;> 30¡< ºÏ§Ö4 ÆI 4 ¼ ÈÉ K 2 «8 ¤ W Ø1ÍÎ2 ¶²: p < Õ 3 4% [. %& !"#' ( )*+, -. E7F. GH -./0 A : 53 12 34 F K ( F L$(R ). > ?CD '(J <I7 <I7 ( T K (b) (sig) (Beta). -.174 -.145 -.141 8.217. 2. * : p< .05 ** : p<.01 *** : p<.001. -3.571 -2.181 -2.451 -2.181. -.250 -.135 -.169 -.138. 12.727 .000*** .187. .000*** .030* .015* .030*. 3 4 p< * 4 ¼ÈÉ 2 ( ¡ >HD - RE 2 K Û 8 ¤: #Ø 1ÍÎ + ÔíU(R )\ 18.7%O Mì. Ø1½RQ + F ϧS F B 12.727, E .000O ?ß 4ÊE ϧ4O 1 ?\ ÀO Mì. + 4 ¼ÈÉ Ï§4O 2 K ÆIO ¢£?1(b=-.174, p=.000), Aß(b=-.145, p=.030), ; >mn1(b=-.141, p=.015) 5 4m7{L(b=8.217, p=.030) ÀO MìD &: I= ÆI, I: E p<.05 AJO I: Ke L\ ÀO Û 9. Ø1ÍÎp< ¢£?1, Aß ±vß, ;>mn1 Ø1§I b g Õ(-)JO : 4 ¼ÈÉ ¢(-) ½O A:. ;> ¢£?1, ;>mn1, A ß ±vß K<¤ f, : ?* ?2Iø 4 ¼ÈÉ RE F\ À O `Î=. &: 4 m7{L Ø1§I b g (+)JO : 4 ¼ÈÉ R(+) ½ O A:. L\ 4 m7{L + > K< ¤ f,Iø 4O ¼ ÀO Mì . ;> 30¡< ºÏ§Ö4 ÆI 44 ¼ ÈÉ K 2 «8 ¤` Ø1ÍÎ: p< <3 5>% [. 3 5 p< * 44 ¼ÈÉ 2 ( ¡ >HD - RE 2 K Û 8 ¤: #Ø 1ÍÎ + ÔíU(R )\ 18.9%O Mì. Ø1½RQ + 2. 2. & !"#' ( )*+, -. > ?CD E7F '(J <I7 <I7 ( TK GH (b) (sig) (Beta) ;< = .233 .244 3.736 .000*** -./0 -.240 .242 -3.724 .000*** M() -1.238 -.150 -2.461 .015* FK 17.357 ( F .000*** .189 L$(R ) 2. * : p<.05 ** : p<.01 *** : p<.001.
(24) . Journal of Dental Hygiene Science Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 75~83 (2002). ϧS F B 17.357, E .000O ?ß 4ÊE ϧ4O 1 ?\ ÀO Mì. + 4 4 ¼ÈÉ Ï§4O 2 K ÆIO ;> 30¡ # fØ4 37(b=.233, p=.000) < ¢£?1(b=-.240, p=.000) 5 >) (b=-1.238, p=.015) ÀO MìD &: I= ÆI, I:E p<.05 AJO I: Ke L\ ÀO Û9. fØ4 37 Ø1§I b g (+)JO : 44 ¼ÈÉ R(+) ½O A:. fØ4 37 L\ {L + K<¤ f,Iø ` 44O ¼ ÀO Mì. ¢£? 1, >) Ø1§I b g Õ(-)JO : 44 ¼ÈÉ ¢(-) ½O A:. ;> ¢£?1, > K<¤ f,\ : 44 ¼ÈÉ RE F\ ÀO Ôí =. ;> 30¡< ºÏ§Ö4 ÆI ;> ¼ÈÉ K »8 «8 ¤ W ØÙYÚ : Ø1ÍÎ2 ¶²: p< Õ <3 6>< [. Ø1ÍÎ p< ;> 30¡ # 369 K<¤ f, ¡2 G: D ¡< ºÏ§Ö4 ÆI Y¡\ ØÙYÚ K ·< ϧ4 1 < 3 u W ÍÎ + G Ó. 3 6 p< * ØÙYÚ4 ¼ÈÉ 2 ( ¡ >HD - RE 2 K Û 8 ¤: #Ø1ÍÎ + ÔíU(R )\ $ 4.2%O MìM Ke F \ ÀO ¿MN. Ø1½RQ + F ϧS F B 9.748, E .002O ?ß 4ÊE ϧ4O 1 )./0 !"#' ( )*+, - F. 2. <@AB ?CD E7F '(J <I7 ( <I7 TK GH (b) (sig) (Beta) 36 "# -.793 -.204 -3.122 .002** FK 9.748 ( F .002** .042 L$(R ) 2. * : p<.05 ** : p<.01 *** : p<.001. ?\ ÀO Mì. Ø1ÍÎp< 369 ¹8 Ø1 §I b g Õ(-)JO 369 K<¤ f,\ : ØÙYÚ ¼ÈÉ ¢(-) ½O A: . Ìf¹º + 369 ¹8 ?\ K<¤ f ,Iø ØÙYÚO ¼ RE F\ À O `Σ I . (3) ¹ºÔ 3 ;> 30¡< ;> ¼ÈÉ ¡\ ÅÆI + ϧ4O : ÛÜ Ý Mì À. ÅÆI fØ37< ±vß ;> 30¡< ;> ¼ÈÉ K Ý O: 0 í 8 ¤ W ÛÜB : t - test W Ý/Ð2 ¶² Ó. de ÅÆI fØ37< ±vß2 4ͤI B, , 1fͤI B< 4fͤI B2 º W 5 â¤
(25) 3Òª2 àbO º1 W àb B Ý/Ð2 ¶² Ó. , fØ37 RE D ;> 30¡ z Û Ü Ý /Ð: p< PQ* <3 7>< [. , ¢£?1(p=.005), 4 m7{L(p=.001), ;>mn 1(p=.000) 5 &§(p=.000) ?R ϧ4O : Ý ÀO Mì. fØ37 F\ àb(2.55) ?\ àb(2.08) ¢£? 1 + S /: ÀO Mì. 4 m 7{L +E fØ4 37 F\ àb(3.33) ?\ àb (2.71) S /: \ ÀO Mì. ;>m n1 +E fØ4 37 F\ àb(2.74) ?\ àb(2.13) S /: \ ÀO Mì. 5 &§ +E fØ4 37 F\ àb(2.92) ?\ àb(2.08) S /: ÀO Mì. + Ȧ4O fØ4 372 4 àb\ & §, ¢£?1, ;>mn1, 4 m7{L z È ¡ + 30RE fØ4 372 \ àb ? Mì. , ±vß D ;> 30¡, ÛÜ : Ý/Ð2 ¶²: p< PQ* <3 8>< [. ¤ 3 + MìT % [ ¢£?1(P=.002) +ª ϧ4O : Ý © 4 m7{L, ;>m n1, 5 &§ + ϧ4O : Ý M ìM3 C.. )1 2' 34
(26) 56' ( 789. 6$ NO PQ ;<= RO PQ 6$ NO PQ S<= RO PQ. -. /0. N. M. S.D.. 90. 2.08. 0.48. 12. 2.55. 0.79. 5 3. N. M. S.D.. 90. 2.13. .47. 12. 2.74. .47. * : p<.05 ** : p<.01 *** : p<.001. K. T. 2.87. K. T. 4.22. P .005**. P .000**. 12 34 N. M. S.D.. 90. 2.71. .62. 12. 3.33. .53. 67. N. M. S.D.. 90. 2.08. .56. 12. 2.92. .49. K. P. 3.34. .001*. K. P. 4.89. .000**. T. T.
(27) . A Study on the Determining Factors of Work Stress Coping Strategies of Dental Hygienists. :;<=' 34
(28) ' ( 56 789. -. /0. 6$. N. M. S.D.. A. 34. 2.52. .57. 179. 2.19. .54. 5 3. N. M. S.D.. : 89 : B : 6$ : 89 : AB :. 34. 2.47. .52. 179. 2.34. .44. K. T. -3.204. K. T. -1.546. P .002*. P .124. 12 34 N. M. S.D.. 34. 3.14. .50. 179. 2.97. .66. 67. N. M. S.D.. 34. 2.49. .54. 179. 2.38. .59. N. M. S.D.. 90. 3.42. .51. 12. 2.85. .71. N. M. S.D.. 34. 3.22. .41. 179. 3.23. .58. K. P. -1.417. .158. K. P. -1.044. .297. T. T. * : p<.05 ** : p<.01 *** : p<.001. )1' 34 !"# 56 789. 6$ PQ ;<= NO RO PQ 6$ NO PQ S<= RO PQ. > ?. N. M. S.D.. 90. 3.40. .38. 12. 3.31. .38. <@AB. N. M. S.D.. 90. 2.45. .75. 12. 2.44. .75. K. T. -.842. K. T. -.066. > ? P .402. T. K. -3.458. P .001**. P -.947. * : p<.05 ** : p<.01 *** : p<.001.
(29) :;<=' 34 !"# 56 789. 6$. 89 :. : :. M. S.D.. A. 34. 3.17. .27. B. 179. 3.38. .39. <@AB. N. M. S.D.. 6$ 89 :. > ?. N. : :. A. 34. 2.29. .66. B. 179. 2.47. .69. K. T. 3.058. K. T. 1.443. > ? P .003**. T. K. .128. P .899. P .150. * : p<.05 ** : p<.01 *** : p<.001. ¢£?1 + A ß(2.52) B ß(2.19) 30 S /0: p< ÀO Mì. , A ß ±vß K<¤ f, B ß ±vß K <¤ f, R¥4O SU T)2 ÀO Mì. ÕO fØ37< ±vß D ;> ÈÉ¡ ÛÜ Ý /Ð: p<. , fØ37 D ;> ¼ ÈÉ ÛÜ Ý /Ð p< <3 9>% [. ¤ 3 + % [ àbr Ý 44 ¼ (p=.001) +ª ϧ4O : Ý MìV © 4 ¼% ØÙYÚ + : Ý Mì3 C. 5ÂJO fØ4 37 ?\ àb(3.42) F\ àb(2.85) ` ;> S 44O ¼ ÀO Mì. + K<¤ f, L 44O `çO+ K<¤ f B> ·n2 в%8. ¤`+ K<¤ f, : S \ fØ4 37 W¡ Ò. , ±vß D ;> ¼ÈÉ¡ : ÛÜ Ý /Ð: p< <3 10>< [. ¤ 3 + MìT * 4 ¼(p=.003) + ª ϧ4O : Ý MìV © 44 ¼% Ø ÙYÚ + : Ý 3 ÀO Mì. B ß(3.38) ±vß2 K<¤ f, A ß (3.11) ±vß2 K<¤ f, ;> ` 4O ¼ Õ2 I .. . ;> X\ ABI±< &'= ;> : í
(30) : ÅY\ «; Rû 8 Z. Beehr% Newman \ ;> Å ;>% &'= ¡,O W R. 10).
(31) . Journal of Dental Hygiene Science Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 75~83 (2002). 4 ;> I± 8 Z µM /4饦4 Ì 2 Ʋ% ;>I±m% ;>&'¡r AO R Ó. French, Rogers 5 Cobb Å ¯U< {L¡ºr g4Ê z2 ;>O R Ó Margolis % Kroes ;> ;>I±m d1< ;>{L A + ;>I±m /4饦4 12 [²% Y;>Ì R Ó. &: Ì;G + 6 ;> ;7, AB´E% ±v 2 q . 5 p< MìT YÚ\ {L Å 1Þd1< \} &' . f, Ì; + L ;> C : Å 30, Å <µ L, % I±p<% &§, &§m, &§, YÚ : ÅÝ z ` pR= 2 ²f . < [ ;> :]^O R 8 $r ó÷ M Ò ¹º + ;> ¡O+ C µ:, 5 Ì; ;> Ì; º1 7, ;>I±<R ;> &' W ¢8¯4 _, ¥¦4 & /4 O 0R Ó. ;> ;>{L ,ë D 5 ;> I± ;> I±m =. + ;> ;> I±m ºÏ§Ö4 d1< ;>% &'= ;>{L ;>Ì A + `«X :. Ò ¹º + ;> 6²% ÀO ºÏ§Ö4 d1< ;>{L< ;> Ì + ab` C. ¢£?1\ m¥ ;> : ic ¢< ;>3 ` í
(32) Q 3 u£ ã 1 À2 : . Lyons ¢£ ?1\ ¢£ Èdm R : µM & ¢£ 8 í
(33) R 3 2 ã 6 = Ó. 5 Kahn z \ 3
(34) 4 ¢£ ?12 L: f\ 53 \ f ;>ª ? ;>&' T) ?D m¥l F Ó. Ò ¹º + ¢£ ?: L : ¼ 4 ¼ÈÉ2 f ÀO Mìe. Ì;º17\ Ì;¦ G W f,< A<R2 Ï` ä `p <R2 &§ :. de Ì; + &§ : Å fm% 3 &§% vw f&m% 3 &§O » ! Sg< 5 1!2 d . ;> &§ + 6 ;> (O vw, g fm% &§ Mh8 ãä , de º17, m¥ ¢£ &` ?12 -. *+ v² &§ Mh* iM 6 £ ¯1 ?\ ÀO Mì . Ò ¹º +E &§ ; 3 u£ L : ¼ 4 44 ¼ÈÉ2 f ÀO Mì. Kasl \ " + ?@ ¡\ {L ` ß1 À :. ?@ ¡ {LOgh. 1= À\ íj 3ª 5, gÍ\ /4 & fØ 4 {LOgh â(£ I fØé/4 ¡ O Å, àb, Ì;Ý7O Í: ¡, O À ,. : 4 {L¡\ [\ /4 ¡ O Í 8 ó( 1Þ2 3¬ . W8+ 4 11). 12). 13). 14). 15). 16). 17). {L\ Ì;º17, 1 Üß2 3 8 ¤ W 4 Ú`X 4 Ì2 À. Ò ¹º p< K<¤ f,\ ;> 30¡ # + 4 m7{L(3.00) ) \ -. ÀO MìD Õ &§(2.41), ;>mn1 (2.38)9 ) 4\ ÀO =b= ¡ \ ¢£?1(2.26)9. "7, 4 {L K<¤ f, > Í: ªEE k ( 3 u À2 D B> KgÍ G4 rsJ mn4O a3 D K<¤ f ¢£E - RE Ííç2 I 9. % [\ p< rf,2 O : íÎ z ¹º + l2 öç: g4: (¡ 30¡O ¿M À< v: p< 2 I 9. &: ;> pR + Å4 ±vß< fØ4 37 Ý 3<R + be #¡: ¢£2 I± ÅÆI £ I . ÷< ½8 ¢£2 fØ4 37\ ¡2 p<O ¹§²% <R + Û $²³ ¡< p< ÌR D, 37I: 4R * 4 <R ;}4O 2 ñ YÚ2 l²m. [ fØ4 37\ È : ±v2 ~²%µM O : p< $²m . Ò ¹º + fØ4 37(3.78) RE >4 ?\ À O MìM rf O : Ì ¹º + fØ 4 37 RE >4 F\ ÀO MìM v: p< 3 uò. \ nO S \ ¹º + ¿M kX £ ä =b=. ±v\ ÈM fØ4, ä4, {L4 ¡ `+ ß 1= o= 8!, 1 z2 p:. Y4O Å ± vß\ A ß< B ßO ºÍ. A ß\ 1$ q< Lx/ W ;>I± ?@ ²r< ¯U2 r Y* / gE Þ4D W J ;>{ L sl: YÚ2 Mì ±v4 dt2 3 . B ß\ A ß< YO ?@ W% /2 3 D <B2 1$ 8 ¤` u:e 2 AB
(35) E R D ²r ºv3 ì 3 ±vQ2 =. Lm ( A ß 60%, Bß 12% O MìM . Ò ¹º +E K<¤ f, ±vß Ìf + 5 ª ÛÜ 2.59O MìM A ß2 f, $r À2 I 9. p< Brief z\ èBÌ; > êw Om, + 26-359 f A ß ±vm ) W3 () : ¹ºp<% K Ó. &: Ò ¹º p< A ß ±vß K<¤ f, B ß ±vß K<¤ f, R¥4O SU T)2 ÀO Mì. Rosenman * A ß\ B > 34D B ß f,\ r 34 Ó. A ß f,\ r&§ ß1 8 m¥ B > ¼ \ ²r< U2 L( ó : . + &§ + A ß K<¤ f, S \ L À\ K¹: p< £ I . 5 ¢ 18). 19). 4). 20). 4).
(36) . A Study on the Determining Factors of Work Stress Coping Strategies of Dental Hygienists. £?1 + A ß K<¤ f B ß K<¤ f, W S \ L À\ A ß f ,\ x4 Ê4O B> ¼ ó L2 8 ãä B> ? µM Ê4 =b L \ L 8 ãä. ¼ÈÉ\ " ¡ : ¢8¯4 < gR4 p< `+ O 8 ¤: ½¾2 pR Å Û ÍÎ <R2 öç: A I . y ¼ÈÉ\ Å d1< &' . Caver & Schieier ä Ñ 2 z ¼ÈÉ< fØ4 37 º 44 ¼ÈÉ {&1< R4 & , Y* g < ØÙ m 4 ¼ÈÉ\ &1< R4 & Õ2 W( . 44 ¼ÈÉ< 4 ¼ÈÉO+ 4Ú4 ÿ* + Ý Â % . Ò ¹º + ¤ ²= ¼ÈÉ2 8ÑO ¼ÈÉ ß2 44 ¼ÈÉ< 4 ¼ÈÉ, 5 ØÙ 4 ¼ÈÉO ß W ¹ºÆIO ÔR Ó. ?@ ä 44O ¼çOü m8 O `p ó 4 4 ¼ÈÉ< Gg4 {LÆ cÚ µM ì *+ ä `p ó 4 ¼ÈÉ, 5 ä`p2 ¹ )8µM µg X\ ØÙ% [\ ½4 8 f ØÙ4 ¼ÈÉO ²Ä I . Ò ¹º p< 30 : ÅÅ ¼ÈÉ # + 4 ¼(3.34), 44 ¼(3.23) 5 ØÙYÚ (2.45) c+O Mì. « K<¤ f,\ B> : yz2 Ñ@ L 44O ä `p ó 8 4 m9 $ L | S \ À O Mì. nO 2198 ¯U K<¤ f 8 ¤`+ ?@ ä 44O ¼çOü m8 O `p ó 44 ¼ÈÉ2 f£ I X = Ò. 17). . Ò ¹º K<¤ f B> + 1H I &'= YÆI, &§ 0í ;> : Ö ä4 6È2 ºç< v² c ) 4²}O+ K<¤ f, L2 l²% + K<"7B > ·n12 ²% E÷2 (m À2 4 O Ó. Ò ¹º + MìT /Ðp< Ô!O R * Õ< [. 1. ;> 30¡# ¢£?1, ;>mn1, &§ ¼½¾ + 4 ¼% 44 ¼ g 4 &2 W (9 ØÙYÚ L : & &§ 6|3 C. 5 4 m7{L¡E ¼½¾ + 44 ¼ g4 &2 W(9M D ¼½¾,\ : &&§ 6|3 C. 2. ;> ¼ÈÉ¡ # 4 ¼ ¢£? 1, Aß ±vß, ;>mn1, 4 m7{L ÆI 2 K ÀO ¿MND, ». 8 18.7% RE À ¿MN. ;> ¼ÈÉ¡# 44 ¼ fØ4 37< ¢£?1 5 >) ÆI 2 K D 5 »8 18.9% RE À ¿MN. 4. ;> ¼ÈÉ¡# ØÙYÚ + 369 ¹8ÆIª 2 K D 5 »8 4.2% < ÀO ¿MN. 5. ;> 30¡ ?@ ¡, + fØ4 37 F\ àb ?\ àb ¢£?1, 4 m7 {L, ;>mn1, &§ + S /: ÀO MìD ±vß L ¢£?1 + A ß B ß 30 S /0: p< ÀO Mì. 6. ;> ¼ÈÉ + fØ37 ?\ àb F \ àb ` ;> S 44O ¼ ÀO MìD ±vß L B ß ±v ß2 K<¤ f, A ß ±vß2 K<¤ f, ;> ` 4O ¼ ÀO ¿MN. ¹ºp< D Õ< [\ i2 :. 1. 3Ò Ià2 Ôä3 , Ó8 ãä ÆI
(37) 1 ~ : R
(38) E ! ¯12 ö D Ôä _1 ãä Úôm ôÆ : ¥ .E ÃÈe ) 8 Z. 2. ¹º I= ÆI W 3Ó8 ãä ?@ ÆI <&§ Ãe ¿M :§ . Ò ¹º Â: :§ 2 ö 8 3ª K<¤. f, % &'= O m 8 ¤`+ nO \ ¹º W¡ Ò. 3.. . xä\ 2002î v(Ö > Ö2 37 : Àc.. . 1. Brenner M.H.: Stressful Price of Prosperity. Science News, 18: 166, 1978. : . , 31(3): 22-25, 1992. 2. 3. William J, Laurie B: A Critical Incident Stress Debriefing Program for Hospital-Based Health Care Personnel. Health and Social Work, 182: 149-156, 1993. 4. : , , 2001. 5. : type A. B (Achievement Striving) , , 13(1): 203-210, 1992. 6. House J: Occupational stress and coronary heart disease: A Review and theoretical integration. Journal of Health Society Behavior, 15: 12-27, 1974. 7. Davidson MJ, Cooper CL: The extra pressures on woman executives. Personal Management, 49: 11-28, 1980. 8. Latack J: Career Transition within organizations: An Exploratory study of work, nonwork and coping strategies. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34: 296-322, 1984..
(39) .
(40) !" #$ %
(41) &' '(
(42) & )&*+, -. / 01 # $ %
(43) &' +,2.
(44) Journal of Dental Hygiene Science Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 75~83 (2002) 9. Lazarus R, Folkman R: Stress, Appraisal and Coping. Behavioral Science Books, New York, 1984. 10. Beehr TA, Newman JE: Job stress, Employee Health, Organizational Effectiveness: A Facet Analysis, Model and Literature Review. Personal Psychology, 32(4): 665-669, 1978. 11. French JJ, Rogers JW, Cobb S: A Model of Person-Environment Fit. in Coelho GV, Hamburg DA, Adams JF(eds.), Coping and Adaptation. Basic Books, New York, 24, 1974. 12. Margolis BK, Kroes WH: Occupational Stress Strain in McClean A(eds.), Occupational Stress. Thomas, 15-16, 1974. 13. Schermerhorn JR, Hunt JG, Osbon RN: Managing Organizational Behavior(2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1985. 14. Lyons T: Role Clarity, Need For Clarity, Satisfaction, Tension and Withdrawal. Organizational Behavior Human Performance, 6: 99-110, 1971. 15. Kahn K: Organazational Stress: Studies In Role Conflict and Ambiguity. John wiley and Sons, New York, 1964. 16. Terberg J: Working Women and Cognition, in Beehr T, Bhagat R(ed.), Human Stress and Cognition in Organization: An Integrated Perspective. John wiley & Sons, New York, 245-286, 1985. 17. Kasl SV: When to welcome a new measure. American Journal of Public Health, 74: 106-108, 1984. 18. , : . , 32: 4, 1993. 19. Cohen S, Wills T: Stress, Social Support and The Buffering Hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98: 99-125, 1985. 20. Brief AP, Schuler RS, Van Sell M: Managing Job Stress. Little Brown, 1981.. 345 6 7 89 %:;< = > ?@A&. . BC5: DE FGH IJ< # $. KL
(45) &'
(46) & )&*+,, 1994. 22. B-: DEM NA OPQR FGH IJ< S M
(47) 2T UVM WXYZG 9[. 9\
(48) &'
(49) & )&*+,, 1991. 23. ]^: Z_ ` $a b cdM DE I J< FG. ? &e #$, 14, 285-306, 1990. 24. fg: hi A #$. jk
(50) &'
(51) & )&*+,, 1989. 25. hl: M M `
(52) m, , jk, 1985. 26. hl: noj ` p q- r s, QRM&#$ 7, s
(53) QRM&#$r, 231-247, 1985. 27. tu: a DEM G IJ< FG. #$. %v
(54) &'
(55) & )&*+,, 1996. 28. 3wx: e" UM /y = z_ I J< FG. {
(56) &'
(57) & )&*+,, 1991. 29. 3|}:
(58) UVM ~ #$.
(59) & '
(60) & )&*+,, 1991. 30. : A hi7 #$. %
(61) & ' '(
(62) & 5&*+,, 1996. 31. : !" #$. ?
(63) &'
(64) & ) &*+,, 1996. 21.. (Received October 26, 2002; Accepted December 9, 2002).
(65)
관련 문서
Consequently, the Stress Coping Training Program is effective for improving children's school adjustment and sub-factors of school adjustment such as
Among the sub-factors of autonomy support coaching behavior, strategy recognition had the most direct influence on the grit of athletes, followed by
The purpose of this study is to find out the factors to be considered to allow people with disabilities to work stably and propose the direction of
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of coping made by CAD/CAM using different scanning methods.. Zirconia coping was made
The “Asset Allocation” portfolio assumes the following weights: 25% in the S&P 500, 10% in the Russell 2000, 15% in the MSCI EAFE, 5% in the MSCI EME, 25% in the
1 John Owen, Justification by Faith Alone, in The Works of John Owen, ed. John Bolt, trans. Scott Clark, "Do This and Live: Christ's Active Obedience as the
The study shows that 29.5 percentage of dental hygienists have experienced the medical disputes and complaints and they are lack of recognition of
Objectives: This study was performed to find the association of job stress with geriatric nursing, coping methods and work environment with turnover intention among nursing