• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Unified Estimations for Parameter Changes in a Generalized Uniform Distribution

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Unified Estimations for Parameter Changes in a Generalized Uniform Distribution"

Copied!
11
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

2 002 , V ol. 13, N o.2 p p . 295~305

U n ifie d E s tim ation s for P aram e t e r Ch an g e s in a Ge n e raliz e d U n if orm D i s t ribu tion

Ju n g d ae K im 1 ) ・Jan g cho on Le e 2 )

A b s tra c t

W e sh all propose sev er al estim at or s for t h e sh ape an d s cale p ar am et er s in a g en eralized u niform dist rib ut ion w h en b ot h p ar am et er s ar e p oly n om ial of a kn ow n ex posur e lev el, an d ob t ain ex p ect ation s an d v arian ces for th eir pr op os ed est im at or s . A n d w e sh all com pare nu m erically efficien cies for t h e sev eral proposed estim at or s for t h e sh ape an d scale p ar am et er s in a g en er alized un iform dist ribu t ion in t h e sm all sam ple size s .

K e y w o rd s : Efficien cy , Gen er alized un iform , P ar am et er Ch an g e.

1 . In tro du c ti on

A r an dom v ariable X is s aid t o h av e a g en er alized u niform dist ribu tion (s ee, T iw ari et al (1996 )) if it s den sit y fun ction is of t h e form

f ( x : , ) = + 1

+ 1 x , 0 <x < , - 1< , (1.1)

w h er e an d ar e r eferred a s t h e sh ap e an d th e scale par am et er s , r esp ect iv ely . It is den ot ed by X G UN IF ( , ) .

P r oct or (1987 ) in tr odu ced t h e fou r param et er g en er alized u niform distribut ion w h ich is a coun t erpart t o Burr ty p e XII distribut ion . A n d T iw ari, Y an g &

Zalkik ar (1996 ) st u died Bay e s e st im at ion for p ar am et er s in th e P ar et o dist ribu tion 1. A s s ociat e Pr ofes s or , Departm ent of Comput er Infor m ation , Andong Junior College,

Andong , 760- 300, Kor ea.

E - m ail : j dkim @andong - c.ac.kr

2. A s sist ant Pr ofes s or , Departm ent of Comput er Infor m ation , T eagu Science College, T eagu , 702- 723, Kor ea

E - m ail : jclee@m ail.t aegu - c.ac.kr

(2)

u sin g t h e g en eralized u niform dist rib ut ion . Lee (2000) stu died t h e e st im at ion s for p ar am et er s in th e g en er alized u niform dist ribu tion .

T h e pu rpos e of t his w ork is t o e st im at e t h e effect s on t h e sh ape an d scale p ar am et er s in a g en er alized u niform dist ribu tion w h en b ot h p ar am et er s ar e p oly n om ials of a kn ow n ex p osu r e lev el t .

W oo & Y oon (1990) con sidered un ified est im at ion s for par am et er ch an g es in a t w o par am et er s P ar et o dist rib ut ion . W oo & A li (1994 ) con sider ed t h e j ack knife p ar am et ric estim ation s in t h e ex p on ent ial distribut ion w h en it s scale an d locat ion p ar am et er s ch an g e fun ct ion s of en v ir onm en t dosag e. A n d W oo & Lee (2000) con sider ed application s of th e W eib ull dist ribu t ion t o th e str en gt h of m at erials w h en it s sh ap e an d scale param et er s are fu n ct ion s of a kn ow n ex posu re lev el.

In t his pap er , w e sh all pr opose sev er al estim at or s for t h e sh ape an d t h e scale p ar am et er s in a g en er alized u niform dist ribu tion w h en b ot h p ar am et er s ar e p oly n om ials of a kn ow n ex posur e lev el t , an d obt ain m ean an d v arian ces for t h eir pr oposed e st im at or s . A n d w e sh all com par e nu m erically efficien cies for th e s ev er al pr oposed est im at or s for th e sh ape an d scale par am et er s in a g en er alized u n iform dist ribu t ion .

2 . E s tim at e s f or P aram e t e r Ch an g e s

A s sum e X 1j , , X n

j

j b e a sim ple r an dom sam ples t ak en fr om X j G UN IF ( ( t j ) , ( t j ) ) , j = 1 , , r + 1 , t i t k for i k an d X 1 , , X r + 1

b e in depen dent . A n d Let X ( 1)j , , X ( n

j

) j b e corr espon din g t h e or der st at ist ics for X 1j , , X n

j

j .

W e sh all con sider u nified estim ation s for th e par am et er ch an g e of ex p osur e lev els or t im es in t h e g en er alized u niform dist ribu tion ev en w h en ( t) an d ( t) are p oly n om ials of t ;

( t) = a 0 + a 1 t + + a r t r > - 1 , for all t an d

( t) = b 0 + b 1 t + + b r t r , t >0 an d b i >0 , for all i = 0 , 1 , , r . D efin e t h e follow in g n ot at ion :

d et [ t 0 i , , t r i ] =

1 t 1 t 2 1 t r 1 1 t 2 t 2 2 t 2 r

1 t r + 1 t 2 r + 1 t r r + 1

.

(3)

By th e m ax im um lik elih ood m et h od , w e can obt ain M LE ' s for a j an d b j , j = 0 , 1 , , r , a s follow s ;

a j ( 1) =

det [ t 0 i , , t j - 1 i , { n 1 i k = 1 n

i

ln ( X ( n

i

) i / X k i ) } - 1 - 1 , t j + 1 i , , t r i ]

det [ t 0 i , , t r i ] ,

b j ( 1) = det [ t 0 i , , t j - 1 i , X ( n

i

) i , t j + 1 i , , t i r ] det [ t 0 i , , t r i ] .

N ot e t h at - ln ( X k i / ( t i ) ) h a s an ex p on ent ial dist rib ut ion w ith m ean ( ( t i ) + 1) - 1 . T h erefor e, it is w ell k n ow n t h at ( ( t i ) + 1)

n

i

k = 1 ln ( X ( n

i

) i / X k i ) h a s a Gam m a dist rib ut ion w ith a sh ap e par am et er n i - 1 an d a s cale p ar am et er

1 (see J ohn son et al.(1995 )). A n d n ot e t h at a 11 a 12 a 1n

a 2 1 a 22 a 2 n

a n 1 a n 2 a n n

= a k 1 A k 1 + a k2 A k2 + + a k n A k n , (2.1)

w h er e A kj = ( - 1) k + j D kj an d D kj is m in or det erm in ant for a kj elim in at ed k - r ow an d j - colum n in t h e det erm in ant , det [ t 0 i , , t i r ] ..

T h er efor e, w e can obt ain th e ex p ect ation s an d v arian ces for a j ( 1) an d b j ( 1) , j = 0 , 1 , , r , a s follow s ;

E ( a j ( 1) ) =

det [ t 0 i , , t j - 1 i , n i n i ( t - 2 i ) + 2 , t j + 1 i , , t r i ]

d et [ t 0 i , , t r i ] ,

E ( b j ( 1) ) =

r k = 0 b k

d et [ t 0 i , , t j - 1 i , n i n ( ( t i ( ( t i ) + 1) + 1 i ) + 1) t k i , t j + 1 i , , t r i ]

d et [ t 0 i , , t r i ] ,

(4)

VA R ( a j ( 1) ) =

r + 1 k = 1

d et 2 [ t 0 i , , t j - 1 i , t j + 1 i , , t i r ] i k

d et 2 [ t 0 i , , t r i ]

n 2 k ( ( t k ) + 1) 2 ( n k - 2 ) 2 ( n k - 3) , an d

VA R ( b j ( 1) ) =

r + 1 k = 1

d et 2 [ t 0 i , , t j - 1 i , t j + 1 i , , t i r ] i k det 2 [ t 0 i , , t r i ]

n k ( ( t k ) + 1)

( n k ( ( t k ) + 1) + 1) 2 ( n k ( ( t k ) + 1) + 2)

2 ( t k ) ,

(2.2)

w h er e d et [ t 0 i , , t j - 1 i , t j + 1 i , , t r i ] i k is a m in or det erm in ant elim in at ed k - r ow an d (j + 1) - colu m n in th e det erm in an t , det [ t 0 i , , t i r ] .

S in ce th e UM V UE ' s of th e sh ape param et er ( t) an d t h e scale p ar am et er ( t) in t h e g en eralized u niform distribut ion (see , Lee (2000)) are g iv en by

( t) U = n - 2

n

i = 1 ln ( X ( n ) / X i ) - 1 ,

( t) U = [ 1 +

n

i = 1 ln ( X ( n ) / X i )

n ( n - 1) ] X ( n ) ,

w e can pr opose t h e follow in g est im at or s for a j an d b j , j = 0 , 1 , , r , ;

a j ( 2 ) =

d et [ t 0 i , , t j - 1 i , { n i 1 - 2 k = 1 n

i

ln ( X ( n

i

) i / X k i ) }

- 1

- 1, t j + 1 i , , t r i ]

det [ t 0 i , , t r i ] ,

b j ( 2) =

det [ t 0 i , , t j - 1 i , { n i ( n 1 i - 1) k = 1 n

i

ln ( X ( n

i)

i / X k i ) + 1 } X ( n

i

) i , t j + 1 i , , t r i ]

det [ t 0 i , , t r i ] .

S in ce ( ( t i ) + 1)

n

i

k = 1 ln ( X ( n

i

) i / X k i ) an d X ( n

i

) i ar e in dep en den t (s ee J ohn s on et al.(1995 )), w e can obt ain ex pect at ion s an d v arian ce s for a j ( 2 ) an d b j ( 2) ,

j = 0 , 1 , , r , a s follow s ;

(5)

E ( a j ( 2 ) ) = a j , E ( b j ( 2 ) ) = b j ,

VA R ( a j ( 2 ) ) =

r + 1 k = 1

d et 2 [ t 0 i , , t j - 1 i , t j + 1 i , , t i r ] i k det 2 [ t 0 i , , t r i ]

( ( t k ) + 1) 2

( n k - 3) , (2.3 ) an d

VA R ( b j ( 2 )

) =

r + 1 k = 1

det 2 [ t 0 i , , t j - 1 i , t j + 1 i , , t r i ] i k d et 2 [ t 0 i , , t r i ]

1

( n k - 1)( ( t k ) + 1) ( n k ( ( t k ) + 1) + 2)

2 ( t k ) .

N ex t , t h e m in im u m risk e st im at or for t h e sh ape par am et er ( t) am on g c (

n

k = 1 ln ( X ( n ) / X k ) ) - 1 - 1 , an d th e m odified M LE for th e s cale par am et er

( t) in t h e g en eralized u niform distribut ion are g iv en by ;

( t) R = n - 3

n

k = 1 ln ( X ( n ) / X k )

- 1 , ( t) MM = [ 1 +

n

k = 1 ln ( X ( n ) / X k )

n 2 ]X ( n ) .

w e can pr opose t h e follow in g est im at or s for a j an d b j , j = 0 , 1 , , r , ;

a j ( 3 ) =

d et [ t 0 i , , t j - 1 i , { n i 1 - 3 k = 1 n

i

ln ( X ( n

i

) i / X k i ) } - 1 - 1, t j + 1 i , , t r i ]

det [ t 0 i , , t r i ] ,

b j ( 3 ) =

det [ t 0 i , , t j - 1 i , { 1 - n 1 2 i k = 1 n

i

ln ( X ( n

i

) i / X k i ) } X ( n

i

) i , t j + 1 i , , t i r ]

det [ t 0 i , , t r i ] .

S in ce ( + 1)

n

i = 1 ln ( X ( n ) / X i ) h a s a Gam m a dist ribu t ion w it h a sh ape par am et er

n - 1 an d a s cale par am et er 1 , an d ( + 1)

n

i = 1 ln ( X ( n ) / X i ) an d X ( n ) ar e

in dep en den t , w e can obt ain t h e ex pect at ion s an d v arian ces for a j ( 3 ) an d b j ( 3)

a s follow s ;

(6)

E ( a j ( 3 ) ) =

det [ t 0 i , , t j - 1 i , { ( n i - 3) n i - 2 ( ( t i ) + 1) - 1 } , t j + 1 i , , t i r ]

det [ t 0 i , , t r i ] ,

E ( b j ( 3) ) =

r k = 0 b k

det [ t 0 i , , t j - 1 i , n i [ n i ( ( t i ) + 1) + 1] - 1

n i [ n i ( ( t i ) + 1) + 1] t k i , t j + 1 i , , t r i ]

det [ t 0 i , , t i r ] ,

VA R ( a j ( 3) ) =

r + 1 k = 1

d et 2 [ t 0 i , , t j - 1 i , t j + 1 i , , t r i ] i k d et 2 [ t 0 i , , t i r ]

( n k - 3) ( ( t k ) + 1) 2 ( n k - 2) 2 ,

(2.4 )

an d

VA R ( b j ( 3 ) ) =

r + 1 k = 1

det 2 [ t 0 i , , t j - 1 i , t j + 1 i , , t r i ] i k det 2 [ t 0 i , , t i r ]

[ n k [ n k ( ( t 1 k ) + 1) + 1] { 2 - n k [ n k ( ( t 1 k ) + 1) + 1] }

- 2 n k ( ( t k ) + 1) - n k + 1

n 2 k ( ( t k ) + 1) [ n k ( ( t k ) + 1) + 2 ] ] 2 ( t k ) .

F r om th e r esu lt s (2.2) th r ou gh (2.4 ), w e can obt ain t h e follow in g s .

F act . (a ) a j ( 2 ) an d b j ( 2 ) ar e u nb ia s ed an d M S E con sist en t est im at or s for a j an d b j , re spectiv ely .

(b ) a j ( i) an d b j ( i) , i = 1 , 3 , ar e a sy m pt ot ically un bia sed an d M S E con sist ent est im at or s for a j an d b j , r esp ect iv ely .

T ables sh ow t h e n um erical v alu es of M S E ' s for a j ( i) an d b j ( i) , j = 0 , 1 an d

i = 1, 2 , 3 , for in an a s su m ed g en er alized un iform dist ribu t ion for s am ple sizes

n 1 =10 (10)30, n 2 =10 (10)30, a 0 = 0 , a 1 = 1, b 0 = 0 , b 1 = 1, an d t 1 = 1 , t 2 = 2

w h en r = 1 . F r om T able 1, a j ( 3 ) proposed by m in im um risk est im at or is m or e

efficien t t h an oth er pr oposed estim at or s for a j , j = 1 , 2 . F r om T able 2, th e M LE

(7)

b 0 ( 1) is m or e efficien t t h an oth er pr oposed estim at or s for b 0 w h en n 1 > n 2 but b 0

( 3) is m or e efficien t th an ot h er pr oposed est im at or s for b 0 w h en n 1 < n 2 . A n d b 1

( 1) is m ore efficien t t h an ot h er pr oposed est im at or s for b 1 w h en n 1 = n 2 .

T able 1. M ean s qu ar ed error s of pr opos ed e st im at or s for a j in t h e g en er alized u niform dist ribu tion .

size

par am et er

M S E

n 1 n 2 a j ( 1) a j ( 2 ) a j ( 3 )

10

10 a 0 5.64283 3.57143 2.75000

a 1 2.96429 1.85714 1.43750

15 a 0 4.85989 3.03571 2.46154

a 1 1.89286 1.32143 1.07692

20 a 0 4.66947 2.81513 2.33333

a 1 1.57423 1.10084 0.91667

25 a 0 4.60107 2.69481 2.26087

a 1 1.43337 0.98052 0.82609

30 a 0 4.57143 2.61905 2.21429

a 1 1.35714 0.90476 0.76786

15

10 a 0 3.80220 2.61905 2.12500

a 1 2.64835 1.61905 1.31731

15 a 0 2.79734 2.08333 1.78107

a 1 1.46598 1.08333 0.92899

20 a 0 2.50830 1.86275 1.62821

a 1 1.09804 0.86275 0.75641

25 a 0 2.38416 1.74242 1.54181

a 1 0.92931 0.74242 0.65886

30 a 0 2.31868 1.66667 1.48626

a 1 0.83516 0.66667 0.59615

(8)

size

p ar am et er

M S E

n 1 n 2 a j ( 1) a j ( 2 ) a j ( 3 )

20

10 a 0 3.26424 2.22689 1.84722

a 1 2.57796 1.52101 1.26389

15 a 0 2.16076 1.69118 1.47863

a 1 1.34628 0.98529 0.86325

20 a 0 1.82789 1.47059 1.31481

a 1 0.95643 0.76471 0.68519

25 a 0 1.67898 1.35027 1.22222

a 1 0.77531 0.64439 0.58454

30 a 0 1.59757 1.27451 1.16270

a 1 0.67320 0.56863 0.51984

25

10 a 0 3.02993 2.01299 1.69022

a 1 2.55562 1.46753 1.23370

15 a 0 1.87071 1.47727 1.30769

a 1 1.29606 0.93182 0.82609

20 a 0 1.51306 1.25668 1.13768

a 1 0.89382 0.71123 0.64493

25 a 0 1.35015 1.13636 1.04159

a 1 0.70571 0.59091 0.54253

30 a 0 1.25974 1.06061 0.97981

a 1 0.59910 0.51515 0.47671

30

10 a 0 2.90476 1.87831 1.58929

a 1 2.54762 1.43386 1.21429

15 a 0 1.70971 1.34259 1.19780

a 1 1.27015 0.89815 0.80220

20 a 0 1.33613 1.12200 1.02381

a 1 0.85994 0.67756 0.61905

25 a 0 1.16422 1.00168 0.92547

a 1 0.66733 0.55724 0.51553

30 a 0 1.06803 0.92593 0.86224

a 1 0.55782 0.48148 0.44898

(9)

T ab le 2. M ean squ ar ed err or s of proposed est im at or s for b j

in t h e g en er alized un iform dist rib ut ion .

size

par am et er

M S E

n 1 n 2 b j

( 1) b j

( 2 )

b j ( 3 )

10

10 b 0 0.01309 0.01473 0.01434

b 1 0.00624 0.00715 0.00697

15 b 0 0.01273 0.01212 0.01187

b 1 0.00388 0.00455 0.00446

20 b 0 0.01318 0.01123 0.00110

b 1 0.00332 0.00365 0.00359

25 b 0 0.01367 0.01082 0.01061

b 1 0.00318 0.00324 0.00318

30 b 0 0.01408 0.01060 0.01039

b 1 0.00319 0.00302 0.00297

15

10 b 0 0.00780 0.00909 0.00897

b 1 0.00591 0.00574 0.00563

15 b 0 0.00615 0.00649 0.00641

b 1 0.00291 0.00314 0.00310

20 b 0 0.00594 0.00559 0.00554

b 1 0.00201 0.00224 0.00222

25 b 0 0.00603 0.00518 0.00513

b 1 0.00168 0.00183 0.00182

30 b 0 0.00618 0.00496 0.00491

b 1 0.00155 0.00161 0.00160

(10)

size

p ar am et er

M S E

n 1 n 2 b j ( 1) b j ( 2) b j ( 3)

20

10 b 0 0.00641 0.00713 0.00709

b 1 0.00607 0.00525 0.00516

15 b 0 0.00410 0.00453 0.00449

b 1 0.00274 0.00265 0.00262

20 b 0 0.00356 0.00363 0.00361

b 1 0.00167 0.00175 0.00174

25 b 0 0.00344 0.00322 0.00320

b 1 0.00124 0.00135 0.00134

30 b 0 0.00345 0.00300 0.00298

b 1 0.00104 0.00113 0.00112

25

10 b 0 0.00602 0.00623 0.00613

b 1 0.00628 0.00503 0.00494

15 b 0 0.00330 0.00362 0.00360

b 1 0.00274 0.00242 0.00240

20 b 0 0.00256 0.00273 0.00272

b 1 0.00158 0.00153 0.00152

25 b 0 0.00232 0.00232 0.00231

b 1 0.00108 0.00112 0.00111

30 b 0 0.00224 0.00210 0.00209

b 1 0.00084 0.00090 0.00089

30

10 b 0 0.00594 0.00572 0.00565

b 1 0.00647 0.00490 0.00482

15 b 0 0.00296 0.00313 0.00311

b 1 0.00280 0.00230 0.00228

20 b 0 0.00208 0.00224 0.00223

b 1 0.00156 0.00141 0.00140

25 b 0 0.00175 0.00183 0.00182

b 1 0.00103 0.00100 0.00099

30 b 0 0.00163 0.00161 0.00160

b 1 0.00076 0.00077 0.00077

(11)

R ef ere n c e s

1. J oh n s on , N .L ., K ot z, S ., an d Balakrishn an , N .(1995 ), Con t in uous Un ivar ia te D is tr ibut ions , V ol. 2, 2n d ed., J oh n W iley & S on s , N ew Y ork .

2. Lee, C.S .(2000), E st im at ion s in a Gen eralized Un iform Distribut ion , J ournal of the K or ean D a ta & I nf orm a t ion S cien ce S ocie ty , V 0l 11(2), 319 - 325 3. P r oct or , J .W .(1987 ), E stim ation of T w o Gen er alized Curv e s cov erin g th e

p ear son sy st em , P r oce ed ing s of A SA Comp ut ing S ect ion , pp . 287- 292.

4. T iw ari, R .C., Y an g , Y . an d Zalkik ar , J .N .(1996 ), Bay es E stim ation for t h e P aret o F ailu r e - M odel U sin g Gibb s S am plin g , I E E E T ransactions on R eliab ility , V ol. 45,(3 ), pp 471- 476.

5. W oo, J .S . an d A li, M .M .(1994 ). U nified Ja ckkn ife E st im ation for P ar am et er Ch an g es in t h e Ex pon en tial Dist ribu tion , J ournal of S ta t is t ical S t ud ies , V ol.

14, 20- 23

6. W oo, J .S . an d Lee, C.S .(2000). J ack knife E st im at es for P ar am et er Ch an g es in t h e W eibu ll Dist ribu tion , T he K or ean Com m un ica tions in S ta tis tics , V ol 7 (1), 199 - 209.

7. W oo, J .S . an d Y oon . G.E .(1990). U nified E stim ation for P ar am et er Ch an g es in a T w o P ar et o Dist rib ut ion , J ournal of N a t ur e S cien ces , V ol 9, 41- 48.

[ 2002년 9월 접수, 2002년 10월 채택 ]

참조

관련 문서

Relationships between calculated flow using water level meter and SWMM runoff with curve

And we shall compare numerically efficiencies for proposed estimators of the scale parameter and right-tail probability in the small sample sizes.. Keywords :

Relationships between calculated flow using water level meter and SWMM runoff with curve

Also, we derive some approximate maximum likelihood estimators of the scale parameter for the half logistic distribution under unified hybrid censored samples.. The scale parameter

Many authors have studied estimations and characterizations in a bivariate beta distri- bution with three shape parameters α, δ and γ, whose distribution was widely used in

In this paper, we establish some limsup results and a generalized uniform law of the iterated logarithm (LIL) for the increments of the partial sums of a strictly stationary

AMALGAMATED PRODUCTS, CRITICAL EXPONENTS AND UNIFORM GROWTH OF GROUPS: A UNIFIED APPROACH.. G´

In order to prove that (XT-)rEr is uniformly integrable, consider process (- Xt) tE[O, &#34;'] which satisfies all the conditions of the theorem.. Using (-Xr)+=XT- and step 2 we