ADR ADR

(1)

.

. ADR

1.

2. ADR

. ADR

1.

2.

3.

4. + 5. IDR

. 1.

2.

3. ADR

.

* (“

”, , 2013.4.12)

. (

) ( ) .

**

: 2013. 4. 23 / : 2013. 5. 30 / : 2013. 6. 4

(2)

I.

ADR

“

” , “ ADR ”

.

(1997 12 )¹⁾ 1999 10

.²⁾ ADR

ADR . ,

(2010 10 ) ADR

, ADR

ADR ADR (

ADR ) .³⁾

ADR 2008

.

“ ( ADR) ”

. ADR

ADR

1) ( “ ” )

(2008.2.29 ) .

2) 1999 ( ) 12,864 ( ,

(2000 ), 11 ), 2012 38,915 (

HP ). 3 ( ) .

3) ADR , “ ADR ”.

20 3 (2010), 121 ; , “ ADR

”, 10 1 (2011), 91 ; , “

ADR ”, BFL 58 (2013.3), 70 .

ADR ,

ADR

DP Vol.17(2005. 8)( , “ , ”

) ( .

http://www.fsa.go.jp/frtc/seika/discussion/2005 /20050811-2.pdf).

(3)

, ADR

. 2012 7

( “

” )

‘ ’ ,

( , )

ADR

.

,

ADR ( ),

( ) .

ADR

ADR ( ).

. ADR

ADR ,

.⁴⁾ ADR

, ADR 4

.

4) , ,

.

(4)

ADR (

), ( ) .

(financial ombudsman) ,

.

( ) ADR (7~8 )

. ADR

ADR .

( )

.

ADR

ADR ,

.

, ADR

.

( ),

( ) 3 (

), ( ) .

, ‘ ’

‘ ’

, FSA

(Finacial Services Authority)⁵⁾ FOS(Financial Ombudsman

(5)

Service) .

, ADR

.⁶⁾ , ADR

ADR

, FOS

FSA⁷⁾ .

ADR ,

.

“ ”

.⁸⁾

ADR ,

“ADR ” .⁹⁾

.¹⁰⁾ .¹¹⁾

ADR

‘ ’ ‘ ’

.

5) 2013.4.1 FSA (Prudential

Regulation Authority, PRA) (Financial Conduct Authority, FCA) 2 .

6) ADR

.

7) FOS FSA FCA

.

8) , , , 2

. , , , 76

.

9) , , 72~73 (6 ADR

, ADR , ADR , ADR

, ADR , ).

10) , , 72 .

11) , , 4 .

(6)

ADR

.

ADR ( )

ADR

. ,

‘ ’( )

‘ ’( ) ,¹²⁾

( )

‘ ’ .

( )

( ) (‘ ’),

(‘ ’).

(= ) .

( , ) (

, ) ADR

4 .

12) .

‘ ’ ( 8 ),

( 35 ).

ADR

. ADR ( )

. ‘

’ .

(7)

( ) ( , , , ) ( ),

( )

[ 1]

( + ) (mediation)

ADR

.¹³⁾ ADR ( )

, (FSMA)

( ),¹⁴⁾

( ).

.

,

(DISP 3.3.4R).¹⁵⁾

ADR ADR (

) ,

ADR ADR

ADR

‘ ’ .¹⁶⁾

13) ADR ( , mediation) , ,

“ADR ”, 53 6 (2004), 31 .

14) ADR , , 7 .

15) , “ (ADR)

”, 25 3 (2011), 64~65 67

.

(8)

ADR ( ) ( ¹⁷⁾) ,

1

( .

). ADR

( )

‘ ’ .¹⁸⁾

ADR

( ).

, (

220 ) ( ).

ADR ,

( ).

.

16) ADR , ,

14~15 .

17)

‘ ’ , (

) ‘ ’ .

18) , , 68 ‘ ’

. ADR

, , , 79 .

(9)

, .

ADR

.

ADR ADR

.

ADR .

(

; Internal Dispute Resolution=IDR )

(IDR ).

. IDR

ADR ,

ADR .

ADR

( ) . “IDR ADR

( )” ADR

. IDR

.¹⁹⁾

,

IDR .

.

19) IDR , , 5 11~13 .

(10)

ADR .

8 ADR

FOS ADR

( ). ADR FOS (

) , FOS (FSA)

( , ). IDR

(IDR ), IDR

FOS ,

FOS( ) .

( ), (

) .²⁰⁾

ADR

( ), 2001 (FSRA)

ADR . ,

IDR (IDR ) ADR

, ADR

( , ). ADR

ADR ( )

.

20) , , , 2 .

(11)

ADR ( ).

ADR (

) 7 ADR ( )

( , ).²¹⁾

2000

ADR

2009 (16 ) , 2010 10

ADR . ADR

, ADR

. ( ) ADR

( ) ( , , ),

ADR

, (ADR ,

)

. ADR ( )

‘ ’

.

, ,

( ).

. 8

ADR .²²⁾

21) , , , 10 .

(12)

.

[ 2] ADR

(FSMA, 2000) (FSRA, 2001)

16

(2009)

(FOS) 7 ( ) 8 ( )

ADR ADR

(IDR) -

( ) ^*

**

***

( ) ( )

( )

+ ( )

+ +IDR

+ ( )

+ +IDR

+ (

)+

( ) , “ ADR ”, BFL 58 (2013.3), 76

( ) *

.

** 10 ( )

( ),

.

*** ADR ADR ( )

.

1

.

22) , , , 76 .

(13)

. ADR

ADR “

” , “ ”

ADR .

ADR , ,

, ( ) (

) .²³⁾

ADR , “

( ) ”(377 , 405 ) “

”(286 , 288 ) . (

) ·

(377 10 ), (

)

(286 1 2 ).

ADR

. , ,

ADR .

ADR “ + + ( )+IDR

( )” . .

23) , , 20 .

(14)

“ ( )

” . ,

, .

.

(

53 ).²⁴⁾ ( 51

). ,

,²⁵⁾ ADR

( 53 1 ),

.

24) “ ” .

25)

( ,

, ),

( , “

- -”,

11 2 (2010), 161 ).

( )

.

ADR .

(15)

ADR . ,

( ). ADR

.

, ·

.

,

( )

. ADR

,

.²⁶⁾ ADR

. ADR

, ADR ADR

.²⁷⁾

( ) ADR ( ADR

)

26) 2 , -

, (2009.3), 53-54 .

27) , “ ADR ”, 22 (2006), 312 , ADR

.

(16)

( ).

ADR .

,

. ADR

.

?

( , )

,²⁸⁾

( , )

ADR

( ,

).

ADR

28) “

[ ] ”

( 35 2 ). "

" , ,

, ,

1

( 28 ).

(17)

.

( ) .

ADR

( ) .

FOS ADR

. FOS

. ADR

, ADR

. FOS

.²⁹⁾ ADR

. , ADR

, (overseeing

body) .

(3 ) .³⁰⁾

, ADR

,³¹⁾ ADR .³²⁾

ADR

ADR 3

.

29) , , , 2~3 .

30) , , 14 .

31) 1

.

32) , , 77 .

(18)

' (twin peaks)

' ADR

33) ,

ADR

.³⁴⁾

.

( 57 3)

( )

,

ADR .

,

.

( )

33) , “ ”, 22 4 (2009.12), 58 .

34) , , (2011.4), 233 ,

,

. , , “ ”,

19 (2011), 91

.

(19)

( ) ,

( )

.³⁵⁾ , (1986 )

( )

, 1997

ADR ( )

.

, ADR

. , ( )

( )

( ).

( pool ),

( ).

( ), (

). ADR

, ‘ (

)’

36) .

35) , , 20 .

36) ( ),

( 53 ).

(20)

.³⁷⁾

ADR

.

( 35 2 ).³⁸⁾

ADR ( )

.

( 55 ).

.

( )

,

([ 1] ).

.

([ 1] ), ( )

( )

37) ,

( )

.

38) ( )

, ADR ( )

. , , “

- -”, 27

4 (2011), 120 .

(21)

ADR . ADR

‘ ’

( 29 ).

( 56 ).³⁹⁾ ADR .

ADR

?

,

ADR .

.

(1989 )

. 1992

.⁴⁰⁾ .

.

( )

39) , (ADR ), 60 ‘

’

( ) . ,

. 40)

( 2 ).

(22)

.

([ 1] )

. ( )

([ 1] ) .

, ADR

ADR .⁴¹⁾

,

.

( )

.

ADR

.

ADR

.

41)

. , , “

”, 23 1 (2007), 65 .

(23)

.

([ 1] )

.

ADR

“ ( ) ” 2

.

( )

, 30

, 60

( 53 . 32 ),

ADR .

‘ ’ ADR

.

, ,

( 16 ),

( 20 1 ).

( 2 ).

(24)

.

( 21 ).

.

ADR .⁴²⁾

ADR ( )

.⁴³⁾

,

.

IDR( ) .

. ADR

,⁴⁴⁾ .

42) ‘ ’ ( 55

), ( 57 ).

43) , , 28 .

44) .

(25)

(

=IDR ) . ADR

IDR (IDR ),

“IDR ADR ( )”

ADR IDR ADR

.

, IDR

.

(

) ADR

IDR .

, IDR

. ADR

IDR

.⁴⁵⁾

.

ADR “

(

) ”

45) ADR

IDR IDR

. , “ ”,

121 (2010.12), 826 .

(26)

. .

.

( )

, ( ) ( )

.

ADR .

ADR ,

.

( , )

.

.⁴⁶⁾

46)

(

(selective arbitration agreement) ),

. , , ,

100 .

(27)

.

. ,

.⁴⁷⁾

( 21 4 ).

.

,

.⁴⁸⁾

.

. (

, ) ADR

.

( ) .

.

47) “ ”

(2009.6.12) .

48) “ ”

(2009.6.12) 2 .

(28)

.

ADR ( )

.

ADR ( )

.

49)

. IDR ADR

ADR

.

( ‘ ’) ( )

7 11

49) 2013 4 11 ADR

( 1 , 2 , 3 ), ( ,

, , ), ( ,

, , , 3 , ) 2 1 .

13 , 28 , 52

93 ( , ADR

). FOS 940 (2005 3 )

( , , 4 ).

(29)

.

,

. ADR

1 ( , ) 3 ( )

,⁵⁰⁾ “7 ”

“1 ” “3 ”

, ( )

( )

.

( ) 1

.⁵¹⁾ ADR

.

50) , (1 ) ( , , 6

), , (1 ) ( ) 3

( , , 14 ). ,

1 , 3 , 5

. , 1

. 51)

(2011 5 . 63 , 63 2). ,

5 9 ( ‘ ’ ) 2~4

(‘ ’) , 200

.

(30)

.⁵²⁾

.

. ,

( ),⁵³⁾ , ADR

( = ), ,

( = ) .

,

.

( ), ( )

.⁵⁴⁾

1

.

( 1 )

52) , , “ ”, 20 10

(2011.3), 11 .

53) , , 43 ; , “

”, (2010.5), 73 .

54) , , , 43 .

(31)

.

( ,

[= ]

). ADR

( 27 ) .

( )

,

‘ ’

.

(

). ,

ADR , ADR

55)

. .

ADR

55)

.

(32)

500

( ) ( 37 ).

. 500

( )

.

( ) .

500

( , )

“ ”

.

(

) ( )

. ( )

.

. ,

( )

( 36 1 ),

.

( 36 2 ).

(33)

( 56 ).

( 36 3 ).

.

( 36 1 ) ADR

.

. ,

1

.⁵⁶⁾

ADR

56) ADR ,

( 35 4 ), (

42 1 ), (

47 1 ), (

32 1 ) .

. , ADR

‘ ’ ‘ ’ (

, , 79 ).

(34)

. IDR

IDR , ADR

.

, ADR

.

IDR( )

.

. .

.

,

. ADR

ADR

.

IDR

.

(35)

IDR . IDR

( 30 ).

. “IDR

” ADR

.

IDR ADR IDR

. IDR

IDR . IDR

, IDR

. IDR

.⁵⁷⁾

IDR

( , )

(

57) 57 10 (IDR )

. IDR

.

(36)

). ,

ADR

. (IDR

)

ADR .

ADR

. ADR

ADR

.

1. ADR

ADR ,

. ADR ADR

.

, ADR

.

ADR ( IDR )

. .

. ,

. , ADR (

) ,

(37)

.

(7 ~11 ) 1 3

, . ,

.

( )

, ADR

.

, ( )

,

“ ”

.

(

) ( )

. ,

‘ ’

, ‘ ’

ADR

.

ADR

(38)

.

IDR ADR

.

2. ADR

, ADR

. ADR

, ADR

. . ADR

.

(39)

KDI, , (2010.7)

, , (2010)

, 2011 , 2011

__________, (2000 ), 2001

, , (2011.4)

2 , -

, (2009.3)

, , (2011)

, “ ”,

(2010.5)

, “ ”, 121 (2010.12)

, “ ”,

(2009)

, “ ADR ”, (2012.5)

, “ ADR ”, 24 3

(2011.9)

______, “ ADR ”. 20 3 (2010)

, “ ”, 23

1 (2007)

, “ ”, 19

(2011)

, “ -

-”, 27 4

(40)

(2011)

, “ ADR ”, BFL 58 (2013.3)

, “ ”, 11

3 (2011.9)

, “ -

-”, 11 2 (2004)

, “ ”, 22 4

(2008)

______, “ :

”, 24 2 (2011)

, “ ”, 20

10 (2011.3)

, “ (ADR)

”, 25 3 (2011)

______, “ ADR ”,

10 1 (2011)

, “ ADR ”, 22 (2006)

______, “ADR ”, 53 6 (2004)

, “ ”, 22 4

(2009.12)

ADR

D P Vol.17(2005. 8)

(41)

< >

ADR

“

” , “ ADR ”

. (1997) 1999

10

. ADR

2008 .

“ ( ADR)”

. ADR

ADR

, ADR

. ADR ,

.

ADR “ + (

) IDR (ADR )”

.

, ADR

.

ADR ( IDR )

.

(42)

,

.

(43)

Korean Style System Model of Financial ADR

Seo, Hee-Sok^*⁵⁸⁾

"Financial ADR" system in South Korea can be represented by so-called

"Financial Dispute Resolution System", in which Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) and Financial Dispute Resolution Committee are the principal actors in operation of the system, and this is discussed as an "Administrative Financial ADR System". The system has over 10-year history since it was introduced in around 1999. Nonetheless, it was not until when financial consumer protection began to be highlighted after the 2008 financial crisis that Financial ADR system actually started to draw attention in Korea. This was because interest has been rising in

"Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)" as an institutional measure to protect financial consumers damaged via financial transactions. However, the current discussion on the domestic Financial ADR system shows an aspect that it is confined to who is to be a principal actor for the operation of Financial ADR institution with main regards to reorganization of supervisory system. This article aims to embody these facts in an institutional model by recognizing them as a problem and analyzing the features of the Financial ADR system, thereby clarifying problems of the system and presenting the direction of improvement.

The Korean Financial ADR system can be judged as "administrative model integrated model consensual model quasi-judicial model non-prepositive Internal Dispute Resolution (IDR) model". However, at the same time, it is confronted with a task to overcome the two problems; the system is not equipped with institutional basis for securing its validity in spite of the adopted quasi-judicial effect model; and a burden of operating an integrated ADR system is considerable.

From this perspective, the article suggests improvement plans for security of validity in the current system and for expansion of industry-control ADR system, in particular, a system of prepositive IDR model. Amongst them, it suggests further plans for securing the validity of the system as follows; promotion to expand the

* Associate Professor, School of Law, Pusan National University

(44)

Journal of Legislation Research / 44th Issue

:

number of internal persons and to differentiate mediation procedures and effect;

a plan to keep a financial institution from filing a lawsuit before an agreement recommendation or a mediation proposal is advised; and a plan to grant suspension of extinctive prescription as well as that of procedures of the lawsuit.